[01:49] <mup> PR snapcraft#1981 opened: tests: remove the internal os_release dependency <Created by elopio> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/1981>
[04:14] <mup> PR snapcraft#1967 closed: project_loader: improve the logic to install patchelf as a build tool <bug> <Created by sergiusens> <Merged by sergiusens> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/1967>
[04:14] <mup> PR snapcraft#1980 closed: elf: remove all un-primed libs from soname cache <bug> <Created by kyrofa> <Merged by sergiusens> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/1980>
[04:47] <mup> Issue snapcraft#1973 closed: Support quering package manager in tests <Created by sergiusens> <Closed by sergiusens> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/issue/1973>
[04:47] <mup> PR snapcraft#1971 closed: tests: remove dependency of internal repo from integration suite <Created by elopio> <Merged by sergiusens> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/1971>
[04:56] <mup> Issue snapcraft#1952 closed: add support for in test release information <Created by sergiusens> <Closed by sergiusens> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/issue/1952>
[04:56] <mup> Issue snapcraft#1982 opened: Update snaps_tests to use the testing tools from tests.integration <Created by sergiusens> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/issue/1982>
[04:56] <mup> PR snapcraft#1981 closed: tests: remove the internal os_release dependency <Created by elopio> <Merged by sergiusens> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/1981>
[04:59] <mup> Issue snapcraft#1714 closed: catkin plugin: recursively merge rosinstall files <Created by sergiusens> <Closed by sergiusens> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/issue/1714>
[04:59] <mup> PR snapcraft#1934 closed: catkin plugin: support recursive rosinstall files <Created by kyrofa> <Merged by sergiusens> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/1934>
[05:02] <mup> Issue snapcraft#1953 closed: Add in test architecture <Created by sergiusens> <Closed by sergiusens> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/issue/1953>
[09:01] <guiverc> a user on #ubuntu claims a snap is "deceptive" in its description on snap store.. does anyone know where this/they should go to report, elevate etc?
[09:37] <Chipaca> guiverc: deceptive how?
[09:37] <Chipaca> guiverc: forum might be a good place
[09:37] <Chipaca> guiverc: (a lot of the team is already en route to budapest)
[09:38] <guiverc> Chipaca, thanks - I've reported via https://forum.snapcraft.io/t/snap-package-in-store-seems-deceiving/4320 for user ...
[09:38] <guiverc> and thanks I didn't know about Budapest ...
[09:39] <Chipaca> guiverc: I don't understand the deception
[09:40] <guiverc> i don't so couldn't explain... i was using words of reporter
[09:41] <Chipaca> guiverc: you mind if I edit your post a little for readability?
[09:41] <guiverc> not at all.
[09:43] <guiverc> the user has left #ubuntu sorry.
[09:45] <Chipaca> guiverc: if you could edit to include what yolozulu is responding to (in particular where they say "right on")
[09:45] <Chipaca> that'd help understand also
[09:47] <guiverc> added (i didn't think important; why I left it out; yeah the right-on was confusing sorry)
[09:48] <Chipaca> guiverc: is the deception that it isn't there for GUI but is from the terminal?
[09:49] <guiverc> i have no idea.. i was just in #ubuntu and tried to respond to to user...
[09:49] <Chipaca> guiverc: ah well. If you see them again, ask them to explain a little more
[09:50] <guiverc> i will, I'll give them a link to the forum so they can do it themselves (instead of via 3rd party)
[09:50] <guiverc> thank you for your help Chipaca, appreciated.
[09:50] <Chipaca> guiverc: thanks
[09:50] <Chipaca> if it's just that it isn't there on gui, that might be a bug (or a series of bugs)
[09:51] <guiverc> (i was trying to find where to pass on to, they'd left before I found somewhere appropriate, ie. forum)
[09:56] <Chipaca> guiverc: it's fine, here's hoping the appear again
[10:50] <popey> interestingly, that snap they're talking about does indeed not show up in gnome software here