[03:21] <halvors> Why is cloud init enabled on the default ubuntu server image?
[03:21] <halvors> Whese are cloud images now? http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-server/daily-live/20180304/
[06:35] <Alabaster> hello if anyone is awake
[06:40] <frickler> halvors: I'm using these but they do look a bit out of date indeed http://cloud-images.ubuntu.com/bionic/current/
[06:44] <andol> Nitpicking, but https://cloud-images.ubuntu.com/bionic/current/ is a slightly better link to share. That is https:// rather than http://.
[06:52] <Alabaster> so does anyone have any idea why sometimes Desktop icons don't show up when you boot or restart linux until I go into tweak tools and turn them off to turn them on????
[06:57] <OpenTokix> halvors: Because it is widly used, and pretty fiddly to enable by yourself. Why would you not have it on a server image?
[07:07] <lordievader1> Good morning
[07:12] <Alabaster> hey i might be in the wrong channel but I have a question if I may?
[07:14] <lordievader1> Alabaster: This is the wrong place for desktop questions, yes. Those you want to ask in the room more specific towards your flavour of Ubuntu.
[07:37] <OpenTokix> Have anyone built a bootable iso with embedded preseed? - Whatever I do I get stuck on install initramfs
=== lordievader1 is now known as lordievader
=== dames is now known as thedac
[12:35] <Sircle> How do I redirect all www urls to non www? I have done this but it seems not working https://pastebin.mozilla.org/9079136
[13:16] <beisner> tinwood coreycb jamespage - fyi, promoted nova-lxd 17.0.0-0ubuntu1~cloud0 to queens UCA update, now in line with bionic main.
[13:17] <coreycb> beisner: +1
[13:19] <frickler> coreycb: do you know something about bionic cloud image builds being broken? most recent one seems to be 10 days old
[13:19] <coreycb> frickler: hmm, i don't but i can find someone who might
[13:22] <coreycb> rcj: is this your realm by any chance? ^
[13:23] <Odd_Bloke> coreycb: frickler: Yeah, we're seeing issues during the build that we're working to debug.
[13:23] <Odd_Bloke> xnox was briefly looking earlier; I don't know if he got anywhere.
[13:23] <coreycb> Odd_Bloke: ok great you're all over it. thanks.
[13:26] <tinwood> beisner, thanks!
[13:27] <xnox> Odd_Bloke, it's in proposed.
[13:27] <Odd_Bloke> xnox: What is "it" in this context?
[13:27] <frickler> Odd_Bloke: thanks, are the build logs public? do you have a dedicated channel where you would discuss this?
[13:28] <Odd_Bloke> frickler: The build logs aren't public, unfortunately (because we build the public images and some private images in the same build process).
[13:28] <Odd_Bloke> frickler: This is the appropriate channel. :)
[13:29] <frickler> Odd_Bloke: great, thanks. I'll just wait for things to get fixed, then. ;)
[13:31] <Odd_Bloke> frickler: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/PcSXDMKqtc/ is the relevant error message, FWIW.
[13:37] <frickler> Odd_Bloke: ah, so that has the fix in proposed, nice one, thx
[13:48] <coreycb> tinwood: ok james opened an MIR bug already so i'll just fill in the blanks
[13:48] <coreycb> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-requests-toolbelt/+bug/1751093
[13:48] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1751093 in python-requests-toolbelt (Ubuntu) "[MIR] python-requests-toolbelt" [Undecided,Incomplete]
[13:54] <tinwood> coreycb, ah, I see.
[14:23] <coreycb> tinwood: ok i filled in the blanks and subscribed the mir team so we can just wait on it a bit now and keep an eye on the bug
[14:23] <tinwood> coreycb, great!  Thanks very much :)
[14:23] <coreycb> tinwood: np!
[14:24] <coreycb> tinwood: thanks for nova-lxd and pylxd :)
[14:24] <tinwood> coreycb, well, getting there.
[17:08] <Epx998> Does /etc/fstab.d work in xenial?  I remember issues with it in precise
[17:21] <nacc> Epx998: never heard of such a thing
[17:21] <nacc> Epx998: and it's not mentioned in the manpage for /etc/fstab
[17:21] <Epx998> hmm
[17:23] <Epx998> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/util-linux/v2.21/v2.21-ReleaseNotes
[17:23] <nacc> lol that same blurb mentions it's removal
[17:24] <Epx998> oh? lol
[17:24] <Epx998> thats funny
[17:25] <jerichowasahoax> nacc: it seems to have been removed from libmount and added to mount?
[17:26] <jerichowasahoax> personally i'm not sure why anyone would need more than the one /etc/fstab anyway but i may just be confused
[17:26] <nacc> jerichowasahoax: oh you're right
[17:26] <nacc> but yes, +1 to your last commend
[17:26] <nacc> *comment
[17:27] <nacc> https://askubuntu.com/questions/168290/why-cant-mount-read-files-in-etc-fstab-d
[17:27] <nacc> it was subsequently reverted
[17:28] <nacc> and you can pass --fstab if you really want it
[17:28] <nacc> but i don't understand a use case
[17:33] <Epx998> jerichowasahoax: we like to keep some files clean and vanilla as possible
[17:42] <jerichowasahoax> Epx998: "we"?
[17:43] <Epx998> yes. we.
[17:44] <jerichowasahoax> Epx998: as in, who is "we"?
[17:44] <Epx998> jerichowasahoax: my team here at work.
=== mikal_ is now known as mikal
=== DalekSec_ is now known as DalekSec