=== soee_ is now known as soee [10:27] tseliot: i've assigned you on some nvidia file conflict bugs [10:55] tjaalton: ok, thanks [10:57] tjaalton: they are not using my driver in LP: #1753796 [10:57] Launchpad bug 1753796 in nvidia-graphics-drivers-390 (Ubuntu) "Conflict between libglx-mesa and nvidia-390 on Ubuntu 18.04 (pre-release)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1753796 [10:57] ha [10:58] that was easy then :) [10:58] yep [10:58] the fact that I can't use an i386 chroot for testing is very annoying though [11:00] no need to, because of multiarch [11:04] no need for i386 chroot I mean [11:07] yes, but still, the best way to test i386 is on i386 [11:53] ricotz: uploaded capnproto with M-A fix, since I just hit that issue myself :P [12:15] tjaalton, thanks [12:15] tjaalton, am I correct that mir support in mesa is going away? [12:15] yes [12:16] ok [12:16] but I'll wait for next mesa rc before uploading that [13:44] tseliot: the file conflict with nvidia-340 is only seen on multiarch I think, and reproduceable on a chroot [13:45] amd64 version provides also 32bit libs but doesn't divert them? [13:46] tjaalton: yes, I'm working on that, and on other fixes [13:47] ok, great [14:30] tseliot, hi, why don't you apply the same packaging layout of 390 to 340? [14:31] ricotz: because 340 doesn't support glvnd [14:31] and I haven't worked on a non-glvnd solution for the new packaging yet [14:32] (which I am going to need for 16.04 anyway) [14:33] tseliot, ok, but this shouldn't prevent you to split up the package the same way [14:33] it won't [14:34] I'm just very busy, trying to get hybrid graphics sorted out [14:34] also multiarch would work [14:34] I see [16:29] tjaalton: the new release should fix that