[10:27] <tjaalton> tseliot: i've assigned you on some nvidia file conflict bugs
[10:55] <tseliot> tjaalton: ok, thanks
[10:57] <tseliot> tjaalton: they are not using my driver in LP: #1753796
[10:57] <tjaalton> ha
[10:58] <tjaalton> that was easy then :)
[10:58] <tseliot> yep
[10:58] <tseliot> the fact that I can't use an i386 chroot for testing is very annoying though
[11:00] <tjaalton> no need to, because of multiarch
[11:04] <tjaalton> no need for i386 chroot I mean
[11:07] <tseliot> yes, but still, the best way to test i386 is on i386
[11:53] <tjaalton> ricotz: uploaded capnproto with M-A fix, since I just hit that issue myself :P
[12:15] <ricotz> tjaalton, thanks
[12:15] <ricotz> tjaalton, am I correct that mir support in mesa is going away?
[12:15] <tjaalton> yes
[12:16] <ricotz> ok
[12:16] <tjaalton> but I'll wait for next mesa rc before uploading that
[13:44] <tjaalton> tseliot: the file conflict with nvidia-340 is only seen on multiarch I think, and reproduceable on a chroot
[13:45] <tjaalton> amd64 version provides also 32bit libs but doesn't divert them?
[13:46] <tseliot> tjaalton: yes, I'm working on that, and on other fixes
[13:47] <tjaalton> ok, great
[14:30] <ricotz> tseliot, hi, why don't you apply the same packaging layout of 390 to 340?
[14:31] <tseliot> ricotz: because 340 doesn't support glvnd
[14:31] <tseliot> and I haven't worked on a non-glvnd solution for the new packaging yet
[14:32] <tseliot> (which I am going to need for 16.04 anyway)
[14:33] <ricotz> tseliot, ok, but this shouldn't prevent you to split up the package the same way
[14:33] <tseliot> it won't
[14:34] <tseliot> I'm just very busy, trying to get hybrid graphics sorted out
[14:34] <ricotz> also multiarch would work
[14:34] <ricotz> I see
[16:29] <tseliot> tjaalton: the new release should fix that