[06:33] <om26er> Hi! Who shall I bug to fix https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1753172 ?
[06:33] <ubot5`> Ubuntu bug 1753172 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "locale settings for Pakistan should be en_PK.UTF-8 not ur_PK" [Undecided,New]
[06:33] <om26er> I might be able to fix it, if provided some direction
[06:44] <duflu> om26er, don't know sorry. Only 'gQuigs' ever replied to a ubiquity bug of mine but not sure who really looks after it
[07:33] <willcooke> morning aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaall
[07:33] <willcooke> woo, lag
[07:33] <willcooke> didrocks, duflu - just waiting for a few peope
[07:33] <willcooke> people
[07:43] <Nafallo> o/
[07:56] <jamesh> kenvandine: here's niemeyer's notes about the user-mounts/portals discussion: https://forum.snapcraft.io/t/development-sprint-march-5th-2018/4345/21?u=jamesh
[07:59] <om26er> duflu: cjwatson, maybe ?
[07:59]  * duflu shrugs
[08:23] <seb128> duflu, what was the question?
[08:23] <duflu> seb128, I didn't have one. But I am adding things to the 18.10 column
[08:23] <duflu> in trello
[08:24] <seb128> duflu, no, I meant on IRC, om26er replied "cjwatson, maybe" but I joined after the question
[08:24] <popey> willcooke: -> telegram :)
[08:25] <duflu> seb128: <om26er> Hi! Who shall I bug to fix https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1753172 ?
[08:25] <ubot5`> Ubuntu bug 1753172 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "locale settings for Pakistan should be en_PK.UTF-8 not ur_PK" [Undecided,New]
[08:25] <seb128> oh
[08:25] <seb128> thx
[08:29] <seb128> om26er, Colin works on launchpad now, try rather cyphermox or xnox
[08:35] <Laney> #ubuntu-installer is the channel for the installer
[08:38] <Trevinho> duflu, didrocks: try to join again
[08:38] <Trevinho> want to see if this solution is doable :)
[09:23] <oSoMoN> https://forum.snapcraft.io/t/call-for-testing-chromium-65-0-3325-146/4390
[09:44] <duflu> Trevinho, before releasing an updated ubuntu-themes, I thought it might be nice to also attempt https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-themes/+bug/1738762 ... but I have not looked yet
[09:44] <ubot5`> Ubuntu bug 1738762 in ubuntu-themes (Ubuntu) "Window buttons lack padding when scale is set to 200%" [Medium,Confirmed]
[09:49] <seb128> duflu, Trevinho, we have a batch of fixes in a ppa, it's as easy to land that and redo a landing that nuke the current one and iterate
[09:49] <seb128> said differently, better to land what we have and just redo one with the new fixes when we get those
[09:49] <duflu> seb128, OK, yes.
[09:50] <duflu> seb128, I was going on the fact that there's no activity other than mine I could see proposed to lp:ubuntu-themes
[09:50] <seb128> also it might result in easier debugging if some of the changes create issues
[09:51] <seb128> duflu, https://code.launchpad.net/ubuntu-themes/+activereviews ... Trevinho proposed 3 fixes yesterday
[09:51] <seb128> + 1 packaging fix
[09:51] <seb128> duflu, you could maybe review Trevinho's proposed changes btw? ;)
[09:51] <duflu> seb128, yeah I was caching that information from yesterday
[09:52] <seb128> k
[09:52] <duflu> seb128, I need to start cooking in a sec so no promises
[09:52] <seb128> duflu, no hurry, tomorrow is fine as well
[09:53] <duflu> seb128, it's possible some of his fixes have bug IDs too :)
[09:54] <seb128> Trevinho, ^ are there corresponding launchpad bugs for your fixes?
[09:54] <Trevinho> seb128: mh, I wanted to check, but I didn't find much
[09:55] <seb128> k, that's fine
[09:55] <seb128> that's not strictly needed, just best to reference them if they exist
[09:55] <Trevinho> but maybe I didn't search deeply enough
[10:07] <om26er> cyphermox: ping
[10:07] <om26er> seb128: thanks, will ask.
[10:16] <cyphermox> hi.
[10:39] <willcooke> desktoppers - anyone build go code?
[10:41] <didrocks> willcooke: I do
[10:41] <didrocks> with the official go binaries though, not the one in distro
[10:49] <willcooke> didrocks, sorted, thanks.  andyrock helped me
[10:49] <didrocks> oki
[10:49] <willcooke> seems a bit odd that you have to set a go path up etc
[10:49] <didrocks> you don't have to set GOPATH anymore with 1.9
[10:50] <didrocks> and there is work to get out of the vendoring/GOPATH completely
[10:50] <didrocks> which I'm in contact with the Google go authors with, as it's going to impact our builders
[10:50] <didrocks> (this is really fresh news, from last week)
[10:50] <willcooke> oooh! good
[10:50] <didrocks> then, we'll have per-path project \o/
[10:51] <didrocks> and no need for this single gopath directory
[10:51] <didrocks> (also reproducible build, which is the whole goal of that 69 pages spec)
[10:55] <robert_ancell> popey, From #PackageKit  - <kalev> robert_ancell: hey, I was wondering if you'd be hugely opposed if we remove the soft dep in Fedora that automatically installs gnome-software-snap for anyone that has snapd and gnome-software installed?
[10:55] <robert_ancell> do you have an opinion on that?
[10:57] <robert_ancell> or flexiondotorg ^^
[10:58] <popey> robert_ancell: eh. I am not sure I understand the question.
[11:01] <popey> Does that mean if someone has "dnf install snapd" and has gnome software by default will not  be able to see  snaps in G-S?
[11:03] <robert_ancell> popey, yes
[11:03] <robert_ancell> they have to dnf install snapd and dnf install gnome-software-snap
[11:09] <willcooke> just to bring popey up to speed - we're going to try and fix the issues which led to this request first
[11:09] <popey> ok
[11:10] <popey> we can of course modify our docs to highlight that users can install both
[11:10] <popey> because they have to jump through the hoop of installing snapd via dnf anyway
[11:10] <popey> but it would certainly be way nicer to not have to do that
[12:45] <sarnold> willcooke: hello :) do you have a few minutes to talk?
[13:06] <willcooke> sarnold, sure thing, shall we come and see you?
[13:06] <sarnold> willcooke: perhaps chrisccoulson has already handled it? :)
[15:01] <jbicha> Laney: howdy
[15:02] <seb128> hey jbicha
[15:03] <Laney> HI!
[15:03] <willcooke> Laney, https://hangouts.google.com/hangouts/_/canonical.com/will?authuser=0
[15:03] <Laney> go thar
[15:03] <Laney> and didrocks too
[15:04] <didrocks> hum, different than the one attached to the meeting
[15:04]  * didrocks switches thus
[15:05] <jbicha> "requesting to join…"
[15:05] <Laney> i didn't attach one :////
[15:05] <didrocks> there was one attached to mine
[15:05] <Laney> TECHNOLOGY
[15:06] <didrocks> Google knows what you wanted :)
[15:12] <willcooke> Laney's machine is having issues.  Please stand by
[15:13] <didrocks> "your time is important to us… we will try to make the wait as short as possible…"
[15:13] <didrocks> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cpt6LQkQwQ8
[15:14]  * didrocks actually is listening to it meanwhile :)
[15:14] <didrocks> ohhhhhhh, there is a 10 minutes version, exciting
[15:14] <jbicha> French elevator music
[15:14] <didrocks> probably yeah ;)
[15:18] <jbicha> ok, I'm ready to get off the elevator now
[15:19] <didrocks> ahah
[15:20]  * jbicha tries to make awkward small talk with didrocks
[15:20]  * didrocks looks down
[15:20] <didrocks> nice carpet!
[15:20] <didrocks> :)
[15:23] <jbicha> yes, that's a known bug with X
[15:23] <jbicha> LP: #1753776
[15:23] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 1753776 in xorg-server (Ubuntu) "Graphics corruption in login animation to Xorg sessions" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1753776
[15:25] <seb128> xnox, jamesh, andyrock, bug #1753776, one comment states it's fixed with the recent .92 update
[15:25] <ubot5`> bug 1753776 in xorg-server (Ubuntu) "Graphics corruption in login animation to Xorg sessions" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1753776
[15:26] <xnox> seb128, let me upgrade
[15:26] <didrocks> ok, I think I have time to make some coffee ;)
[15:27] <jbicha> I still saw the bug today after rebooting (with all updates installed)
[15:27] <seb128> xnox, jbicha, andyrock also says he still get it
[15:32] <jbicha> ooh
[15:36] <seb128> jibel, could you review https://code.launchpad.net/~seb128/ubiquity/nonfree-mp3-label/+merge/341159 when you have some time? The wording has been pre-approved by mpt earlier
[15:38] <jibel> seb128, sure, next on my list
[15:38] <seb128> jibel, thx
[15:40] <didrocks> seb128: it's not correct, mind if I review/comment?
[15:43] <jbicha> I've never used 'gbp clone'
[15:44] <jbicha> oh, one of the problems might be because debian/gbp.conf points to debian/master which doesn't exist in your LP repo
[15:50] <seb128> I think I missed some steps but why does it do that?
[15:50] <seb128> $ gbp buildpackage
[15:50] <seb128> gbp:error: You are not on branch 'debian/master' but on 'ubuntu/master'
[15:50] <seb128> gbp:error: Use --git-ignore-branch to ignore or --git-debian-branch to set the branch name.
[15:51] <jbicha> because debian/gbp.conf needs to be updated to point to ubuntu/master instead of debian/master
[15:51] <seb128> which gbp branch would have done for me if it had worked?
[15:51] <jbicha> I haven't done that yet because we hadn't officially changed this to git yet ;)
[15:52] <seb128> why can't it just build from the current branch?
[15:52] <seb128> feels weird to refuse
[15:53] <jbicha> git remote add gnome https://git.gnome.org/browse/gvfs
[15:53] <jbicha> using 'upstream' as the name feels odd to me
[15:54] <seb128> that's complicated :/
[15:54] <seb128> there is no debian tools setting up those stuff for you?
[15:54] <jbicha> no, there is no tool for adding the git remote yet
[15:54] <seb128> :/
[16:42] <willcooke> night all
[16:53] <jbicha> Security approved the libblockdev MIR. I think I'm going to do a udisks2 upload to drop its recommends: libblockdev-crypto2 since that needs volume-key and we didn't do a MIR for that