/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2018/03/08/#ubuntu-release.txt

wxlbashfulrobot: are you looking for consensus on delaying until friday eve or is that a decision? i think i like the idea.00:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-12.13] (core, kernel)00:37
valoriebashfulrobot: I'm a +1 on that as well, unless everyone has successful tests ahead of that00:38
bashfulrobotwxl: since there hasn't been enough real feedback. I'm just going to make the call and say Friday evening.01:07
bashfulrobotIt appears as though enough of the flavors can benefit from this flight extension. But I think we have to be pretty hard on that deadline though.01:07
wxlbashfulrobot: sounds good. might want to throw that out on ubuntu-release01:07
bashfulrobotvalorie: thank you for the feedback!01:07
bashfulrobotOkay I'll figure out an email shortly.01:07
bashfulrobotGreat suggestions. wxl01:08
tsimonq2infinity: So I'm hearing reports of this awesome little guy: bug 1752772.01:11
ubot5`bug 1752772 in linux (Ubuntu) "r8169 ethernet card don't work after returning from suspension" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/175277201:11
slangasekthat extends the freeze affecting in-flight transitions; how about if I unblock lxhotkey in the meantime, to get libunistring done (low risk of breaking images after a respin)01:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dptfxtract [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [1.2-0ubuntu1]01:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [armhf] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-12.13] (core, kernel)02:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted percona-xtradb-cluster-5.7 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.7.20-29.24-0ubuntu1]03:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted percona-xtradb-cluster-5.7 [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [5.7.20-29.24-0ubuntu1]03:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted percona-xtradb-cluster-5.7 [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [5.7.20-29.24-0ubuntu1]03:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted percona-xtradb-cluster-5.7 [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [5.7.20-29.24-0ubuntu1]03:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted percona-xtradb-cluster-5.7 [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [5.7.20-29.24-0ubuntu1]03:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted percona-xtradb-cluster-5.7 [i386] (bionic-proposed) [5.7.20-29.24-0ubuntu1]03:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted granite [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.5+ds-1]03:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libauth-googleauth-perl [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.02-1]03:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libwww-shorten-5gp-perl [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.030-1]03:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected python-bayespy [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.5.12-1]03:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hg-git [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.8.11-1]03:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted materia-gtk-theme [sync] (bionic-proposed) [20180110-1]03:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libmanette [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.2.0-1]03:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: granite [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.5+ds-1] (no packageset)03:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libmanette [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.2.0-1] (no packageset)03:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libwww-shorten-5gp-perl [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.030-1] (no packageset)03:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libauth-googleauth-perl [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.02-1] (no packageset)03:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libmanette [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.2.0-1] (no packageset)03:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libmanette [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.2.0-1] (no packageset)03:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: granite [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.5+ds-1] (no packageset)03:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libmanette [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.2.0-1] (no packageset)03:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: granite [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.5+ds-1] (no packageset)03:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libmanette [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.2.0-1] (no packageset)03:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: granite [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.5+ds-1] (no packageset)03:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: materia-gtk-theme [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [20180110-1] (no packageset)03:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hg-git [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.8.11-1] (no packageset)03:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: granite [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.5+ds-1] (no packageset)03:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libmanette [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.2.0-1] (no packageset)03:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: granite [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.5+ds-1] (no packageset)03:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted granite [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [0.5+ds-1]03:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted granite [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [0.5+ds-1]03:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted granite [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [0.5+ds-1]03:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted granite [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [0.5+ds-1]03:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted granite [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [0.5+ds-1]03:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted granite [i386] (bionic-proposed) [0.5+ds-1]03:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hg-git [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [0.8.11-1]03:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libwww-shorten-5gp-perl [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [1.030-1]03:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libauth-googleauth-perl [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [1.02-1]03:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted materia-gtk-theme [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [20180110-1]03:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pulseaudio (xenial-proposed/main) [1:8.0-0ubuntu3.8 => 1:8.0-0ubuntu3.9] (core)03:49
tsimonq2Begone, nodejs delta!03:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libmanette [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [0.2.0-1]04:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libmanette [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [0.2.0-1]04:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libmanette [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [0.2.0-1]04:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libmanette [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [0.2.0-1]04:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libmanette [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [0.2.0-1]04:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libmanette [i386] (bionic-proposed) [0.2.0-1]04:06
Ukikies/\ delta//04:24
tsimonq2I wish.04:25
tsimonq2But, at least this should be the last time (for a while) that my name will be on that beast.04:25
mwhudsonheh just do what xnox does and put slangasek in the changelog :)04:45
tsimonq2hahahahahahaha04:46
tsimonq2infinity, slangasek, Laney: Hi, when someone has a chance, I would like some feedback wrt my latest comment on bug 1654761. I want to make sure my pre-implementation notes are correct and that how I want to go about doing this is valid before I proceed.05:02
ubot5`bug 1654761 in britney "Use another status for retried but queued items" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/165476105:02
tsimonq2Thanks.05:02
tsimonq2Oh, so about nodejs... hah "Not touching package due to block request by freeze (contact #ubuntu-release if update is needed)"05:07
tsimonq2Oh well.05:07
tsimonq2It's not *urgent*.05:07
* tsimonq2 goes to bed05:08
flocculantbashfulrobot: I guess I'll concur with extending - would be a whole lot better to know this beforehand though05:09
bashfulrobotflocculant: apologies. The general consensus seemed to be heading in that way.05:21
infinityflexiondotorg: To be fair, if you have no reason to extend, you can mark your images ready on Thursday, and they'll just release the next day with everyone else's. :P05:21
flocculantinfinity: I assume you meant me - and yea :)05:21
infinityflocculant: Yes, you and flexiondotorg break my tab completion every time.05:21
flocculantinfinity: also to be fair I also concur with your belief that these milestones shouldn't get published :)05:22
infinityflocculant: I think we're approaching concensus on that line of reasoning, and going to put forth a proposal next weekish.05:23
flocculantinfinity: I broke gunnarhj on the discourse thing - he confused us there - and flexiondotorg is wimpress on that ...05:23
flocculantyep - read re that discussion the other day in here05:24
flocculantinfinity: quick question - with the ubiquity change that moves keyboard layout to earlier all the testcases on the tracker are wrong - that's a lot of changes to put through. I sort of have a vague memory of reading something about subiquity replacing ubiquity - is that right? And if it is, likely to be 'soonish' in which case the tescase changes can be less importand I hope05:30
mwhudsonflocculant: subiquity is "ubiquity for servers"05:34
mwhudsonflocculant: it's not replacing ubiquity at all05:34
mwhudson(it's not even really that really but well)05:34
flocculantmwhudson: oh right - read that wrong then :|05:34
flocculantwould have made life easier lol05:34
UkikieWe're not supposed to be reading 'sub-par ubiquity', I gather..05:44
* tsimonq2 protests by spelling it "sub-iquity" sometimes05:47
tsimonq2flocculant: No, that was OMG Ubuntu misinterpreting Didier's commit message. sub-iquity won't replace ubiquity.05:48
mwhudsonit's /spelt/ "subiquity" but it's /pronounced/ "live-server"05:52
tsimonq2That's a bit ambiguous. :P05:53
Ukikiemwhudson: ...I don't think that's how English works. :>05:55
mwhudsonUkikie: cmon, it's at least plausible05:55
flocculantha05:56
tsimonq2^05:58
slangasekmwhudson: you have a golang-golang-x-sys autopkgtest failure on arm6406:56
slangasekLocutusOfBorg: you have a python-mechanicalsoup autopkgtest failure on all archs06:57
acheronukbashfulrobot: a delay is fine by me. I have not been able to touch iso testing yet, as was somewhat busy yesterday07:22
tjaaltonwhat's up with curl? it's breaking unity-scopes-api tests which block capnproto07:41
tjaaltonexample https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-bionic/bionic/amd64/u/unity-scopes-api/20180308_034127_ac201@/log.gz07:42
dokoLocutusOfBorg: are you aware of the llvm 6 sanitizer test failures on amd64?07:43
LocutusOfBorgslangasek, I did upload the pytest-mock fix in debian yesterday, but got lost due to dak crashing07:48
LocutusOfBorgI sync'd it now, should be fixed when it is accepted07:48
LocutusOfBorgdoko, seems a regression in the package in release too07:49
LocutusOfBorgI'll have a look07:49
LocutusOfBorgI have some issues with internet, and tomorrow I'll be afk until monday :/07:53
slangasekLocutusOfBorg: k, cheers.  Why was python-mechanicalsoup a post-FF upload?07:58
slangasektsimonq2: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1754174 was reported as a bug on the ISO tracker for Lubuntu, it looks very wrong with a syslog full of commands-not-found.  But others are reporting successful installs... do you have any idea what's going on there?08:05
ubot5`Ubuntu bug 1754174 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "Install in VirtualBox crashes when "Installing System"" [Undecided,Confirmed]08:05
seb128slangasek, hey, could you update your britney gvfs/s390x hint from ubuntu1 to ubuntu2 to match the recent update?08:22
slangasekseb128: done08:25
seb128slangasek, thx08:29
LocutusOfBorgslangasek, sorry, but I failed to see new features09:09
LocutusOfBorgthey added some new tests, but not new features09:09
cyphermoxsil2100: can I haz code review plz? https://code.launchpad.net/~cyphermox/britney/+git/britney2-ubuntu/+merge/340864  :)09:17
Laneystgraber: want to look at those armhf config changes with me at some point today/tomorrow?09:27
jibelslangasek, I reproduced this bug if I select only-ubiquity on lubuntu. Trying on Ubuntu now.09:36
mwhudsonblug need to get golang-1.7 and 1.8 removed from bionic09:40
* mwhudson goes to bed instead of doing anything useful09:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-12.13] (core, kernel)09:47
stgraberLaney: yep, let me know when you have some time10:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (artful-proposed/main) [4.13.0-37.42] (core, kernel)10:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.13.0-37.42~16.04.1] (kernel)10:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (artful-proposed) [4.13.0-37.42]10:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.13.0-37.42~16.04.1]10:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-12.13] (core, kernel)10:52
Odd_Blokexnox: http://paste.ubuntu.com/p/2gVzRDckcp/10:54
Odd_Blokexnox: https://github.com/rails/rails/commit/be9dc78fccc80bb5045c67b435b5c7e36ea8a29611:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-12.13]11:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-12.13]11:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-12.13]11:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-12.13]11:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-12.13]11:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux [i386] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-12.13]11:19
Odd_Blokexnox: http://paste.ubuntu.com/p/Nzy2GTgG9J/11:21
tsimonq2slangasek: No clue.12:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-12.13] (core, kernel)12:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-12.13]14:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: openwsman (bionic-proposed/primary) [2.6.5-0ubuntu1]14:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: wsmancli (bionic-proposed/primary) [2.6.0-0ubuntu1]15:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected python-cryptography [source] (artful-proposed) [1.9-1ubuntu1]15:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected python-cryptography [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.2.3-1ubuntu0.2]15:30
Odd_Blokeslangasek: I believe all of the the ruby-celluloid related regressions need rerunning with the -proposed ruby-defaults.15:31
Odd_Blokexnox: http://paste.ubuntu.com/p/sFrpG7gGFB/15:43
slangasekOdd_Bloke: I believe I retriggered those before or after you mentioned here16:14
slangasekOdd_Bloke: but I believe many things that are wrong and this is one16:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-pyperclip [source] (artful-proposed) [1.5.27-3ubuntu1]16:19
Odd_Blokeslangasek: "this"?16:21
Odd_Blokexnox: http://paste.ubuntu.com/p/SY5QjsjNRs/16:21
slangasekOdd_Bloke: my previous attempt to retrigger seems not to have done anything - and now I have retriggered again and it's confirmed working16:21
Odd_BlokeGlad I could help.16:21
Odd_Bloke^_^16:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [source] (artful-proposed) [2.02~beta3-4ubuntu7.3]16:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-signed [source] (artful-proposed) [1.85.3]16:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gedit-plugins [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.27.92-1] (no packageset)16:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gedit-plugins [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.27.92-1] (no packageset)16:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gedit-plugins [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.27.92-1] (no packageset)16:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gedit-plugins [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.27.92-1] (no packageset)16:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gedit-plugins [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.27.92-1] (no packageset)16:46
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected pulseaudio [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:8.0-0ubuntu3.9]16:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (artful-proposed/main) [2.02~beta3-4ubuntu7.2 => 2.02~beta3-4ubuntu7.3] (core)16:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gedit-plugins [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.27.92-1] (no packageset)16:48
naccslangasek: xnox: so what's up with ruby, i'm told i should help fix it :)16:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sahara-dashboard [source] (xenial-proposed) [4.0.0-1ubuntu1]16:54
xnoxnacc, see the list of autopkgtest regressions triggered by ruby-defaults.... figure out if these need fixing with uploads; or retries; or by hinting over them. And do these actions, until clean.16:55
naccxnox: ack, i'll pick it up now16:55
xnoxnacc, some of us have been uploading things. but i don't think anybody will be too sad if we step on each other. most of these are quick, it's just there are a lot of them..... =/16:56
naccxnox: yes, sounds familiar :)16:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntukylin-default-settings [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.3.14ubuntu0.1]17:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (artful-proposed/main) [2.02~beta3-4ubuntu7.2 => 2.02~beta3-4ubuntu7.3] (core)17:09
xnoxnacc, or you can upload Odd_Bloke pastebins above, which he was asking to be sponsored.17:09
naccxnox: i'll take a look17:09
Odd_Blokenacc: http://paste.ubuntu.com/p/SY5QjsjNRs/ and http://paste.ubuntu.com/p/sFrpG7gGFB/ are pending, I believe.17:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apt [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.2.26]17:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gedit-plugins [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [3.27.92-1]17:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gedit-plugins [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [3.27.92-1]17:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gedit-plugins [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [3.27.92-1]17:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gedit-plugins [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [3.27.92-1]17:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gedit-plugins [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [3.27.92-1]17:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gedit-plugins [i386] (bionic-proposed) [3.27.92-1]17:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted systemd [source] (xenial-proposed) [229-4ubuntu21.2]17:33
bashfulrobotacheronuk: that was the general feeling I was getting from the group.17:42
naccOdd_Bloke: looks like homesick is fixed in debian17:49
naccrake appears to pass with all-proposed17:53
naccah just needs rake itself rom proposed17:55
naccretriggered those17:55
naccOdd_Bloke: sponsoring your debdiffs18:06
Odd_Blokenacc: Thanks!18:21
Odd_Blokenacc: BTW, I believe xnox has an upload of rails pending, so I'd avoid doing anything there for now.18:40
Odd_Blokexnox: Right?18:41
Odd_Blokecpaelzer_: So vagrant has now migrated, but vagrant-libvirt itself is still stuck because it's trying to use the Debian box in its own autopkgtests.19:00
Odd_Blokecpaelzer_: We don't have a libvirt version of the Ubuntu box, so I'm not sure what to suggest.19:01
Odd_Blokecpaelzer_: (Other than skipping/dropping the test, obviously. :p)19:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted systemd [source] (trusty-proposed) [204-5ubuntu20.27]19:14
Odd_Blokenacc: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=bionic&arch=amd64&package=jekyll&trigger=ruby-safe-yaml%2F1.0.4-1ubuntu1&trigger=ruby-defaults%2F1%3A2.5~1000grauubuntu1 (etc., for the rest of the releases) should fix the ruby-safe-yaml regressions there.19:24
Odd_Blokes/releases/arches/19:27
naccOdd_Bloke: thanks, triggering19:47
naccOdd_Bloke: hrm, did Floats change in 2.5?20:02
naccthat seems to be the issue underlying ruby-autoparse20:03
naccundefined method `[]' for 3.14:Float20:03
Odd_Blokenacc: I'm not sure; my thinking on that was that it's testing invalid input _anyway_ so an exception isn't the worst thing in the world.20:07
Odd_BlokeBut I couldn't quite convince myself of that, so I ignored it. :p20:07
naccI think it should be a different exception20:07
naccOdd_Bloke: given that it passed before20:07
Odd_Blokenacc: That said: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/MTfWz2jxqR/20:08
naccOdd_Bloke: yeah, so i think it's supposed to be not getting to this point20:09
naccbut i'm not sure20:09
Odd_BlokeOr, because it's Ruby, something anywhere in the dependency chain could define [] for Float.20:09
Odd_BlokeAnd it's stopped doing it since 2.320:09
naccOdd_Bloke: right20:11
naccOdd_Bloke: ok, i think what this is trying to test is that you have to have nil-ended binary trees20:17
naccOdd_Bloke: so it does seem like (even if typeerror is wrong), the exception should lead to invalid being true20:18
nacci'm not 100%20:18
Odd_BlokeI'm trying to run tests locally to no avail.20:19
Odd_Blokenacc: Nothing depends on it, and it's dead upstream; should we drop it?20:23
mwhudsoncould someone mark golang-github-prometheus-tsdb/0.0~git20180118.467948f-1 as badtest20:44
mwhudsonit's one of these super flaky tests that has had the bad luck to pass once or twice: http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/g/golang-github-prometheus-tsdb/bionic/amd6420:44
naccOdd_Bloke: i'm thinking that might be easiest (for the trasnsition) there's also https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=88814620:45
ubot5`Debian bug 888146 in src:ruby-autoparse "ruby-autoparse: FTBFS on ruby2.5: undefined method `[]' for 3.14:Float" [Serious,Open]20:45
naccOdd_Bloke: which means if debian fixes it, we can sync it back in in the future, in theory20:46
Odd_Blokenacc: +120:46
naccOdd_Bloke: have you started a bug of stuff that should be removed?20:46
Odd_Blokenacc: And that's also following slangasek's guidance to drop broken stuff to get this done.20:46
Odd_Blokenacc: I have not.20:46
naccOdd_Bloke: ack, will start it20:46
Odd_BlokeThanks.20:47
naccOdd_Bloke: LP: #1754464 we'll just open tasks there as necesary20:49
ubot5`Launchpad bug 1754464 in ruby-autoparse (Ubuntu) "remove broken ruby srcpkgs due to ruby-defaults stuck in bionic-proposed" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/175446420:49
Odd_Blokenacc: Thanks!20:52
naccOdd_Bloke: np20:53
naccOdd_Bloke: retriggering homesick as the debian version migrated20:53
Odd_Blokenacc: I think retriggering ruby-aws-sdk with ruby-defaults should also fix that.20:55
naccweird, ruby-aws-sdk has already migrated, but rmadison doesn't show the new version in bionic-proposed or bionic release20:55
naccOdd_Bloke: I usually wait until i see it in rmadison to retrigger to be sure it's hit the arhcive20:55
Odd_BlokeAh, yeah, makes sense.20:55
naccbut the above is odd20:56
nacchttps://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby-aws-sdk/1.67.0-1ubuntu1/+publishinghistory20:56
nacci'll retrigger it anyways, since it was published a bit ago20:56
Odd_Blokenacc: I can look at ruby-bert.20:57
naccOdd_Bloke: cool, i'll look at the one after that20:57
naccOdd_Bloke: i retriggered ruby-bio to pick up the new version20:59
Odd_BlokeThanks.21:05
naccOdd_Bloke: i'll look at ruby-celluloid-io21:06
Odd_Blokenacc: The ruby-celluloid upload I did earlier should have fixed that.21:08
naccOdd_Bloke: i don't see one?21:09
naccat least not in rmadison21:09
Odd_Blokenacc: I think it migrated?21:11
naccOdd_Bloke: not in bionic at all21:11
naccOdd_Bloke: the version in bionic is what is in artful21:11
nacchttps://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby-celluloid-io21:11
Odd_Blokenacc: s/-io//21:12
Odd_BlokeIs what should fix -io.21:12
naccOdd_Bloke: oh that's the underlyiung cuase (ruby-celluloid)21:12
naccsorry21:12
Odd_BlokeNo worries.21:12
Odd_BlokeLow edit distance. :p21:13
naccok will retrigger those21:13
nacci *just* ran the test locally first and21:14
naccGet:13 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic/universe amd64 ruby-celluloid all 0.16.0-4 [40.0 kB]21:14
naccwth21:14
naccwill check if it passes after another update in the lxd21:15
naccOdd_Bloke: ok confirmed, i must have raced the update :)21:17
naccretriggered celluloid-io21:17
naccare all the *rail* being taken care of by xnox then?21:17
Odd_Blokenacc: Well, I don't know if he'll take care of all of them, but he's going to fix the debug-inspector issue that shows up in a lot of them.21:19
Odd_BlokeSo I'd wait until that's available, to avoid a bunch of unnecessary triage.21:20
naccyep21:20
nacci'm checking ot see if ruby-cucumber-rails is fixed by the new sdoc21:21
Odd_Blokenacc: http://paste.ubuntu.com/p/bVfH6V8NKd/21:31
Odd_BlokeHold on, actually, I'm testing that locally.21:34
Odd_BlokeI forgot that I was going to wait for the tests to finish before I pinged you. :p21:34
Odd_Blokenacc: OK, now it's passed locally.21:35
naccOdd_Bloke: ack, sponsoring (needs an update-mainatiner, i assume)21:37
naccoh nm21:38
Odd_BlokeYeah, I had a confusing moment when I ran it and it errored.21:39
Odd_BlokeLooking at ruby-delayed-job-active-record.21:44
naccrbasak: afaict, the SourceSpec does not let me specify the treeish / influence it, right?22:09
nacci could fake it by having one with patches and one without22:09
rbasaknacc: correct, but perhaps we should add that as a feature somehow.22:14
rbasakI'm assuming you want to mutate the tree object just so it has a different hash for the purpose of this test.22:15
naccyep22:15
nacci think i can do the hack for now, and we can talk about the 'right' way later22:15
rbasakBut that seems like a legit thing to test, and it should be relatively trivial to implement in SourceSpec.22:15
nacci think i'm in a good groove for writing the cases up22:15
rbasakInteresting choice of channel though :)22:15
naccrbasak: bah :)22:16
naccrbasak: mis-typed :)22:16
Odd_Blokenacc: http://paste.ubuntu.com/p/2BjCDNsYrn/ <-- this should fix ruby-delayed-job-active-record, but note it is for ruby-delayed-job22:20
Odd_Bloke(-active-record evidently exercises some code that ruby-delayed-job itself doesn't.)22:20
naccOdd_Bloke: sponsoring22:20
Odd_BlokeThanks!22:22
naccOdd_Bloke: np (sponsored)22:22
Odd_Blokeruby-devise is sneakily failing due to rails.22:23
naccheh22:23
Odd_BlokeIHNI about the ruby-fakefs failure, I'm seeing if I can reproduce it locally.22:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop amd64 [Bionic Beta 1] has been marked as ready22:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop i386 [Bionic Beta 1] has been marked as ready22:44
Odd_BlokeI can.22:45
Odd_BlokeI'm going to skip over it though, it's a bit beyond me at this point in the evening.22:48
naccOdd_Bloke: np, i'm sure we won't get done today :)22:49
Odd_BlokeAlright, I'm heading to bed.22:53
Odd_Blokenacc: Good luck!22:53
Odd_Bloke(And thanks for the sponsoring!)22:53
naccOdd_Bloke: yw, nice progress so far22:54
bashfulrobotHow is everyones testing going? Still looking good for the beta 1 release?22:59
acheronukas usual, trouble getting coverage on i38623:00
jbichaacheronuk: there's a fix for that…23:01
acheronukjbicha: yup23:01
jbichaacheronuk: 18.10?23:02
bashfulrobotacheronuk: drop 386?  ;-p23:02
jbichayes23:02
bashfulrobotWe have been discussing it as well.23:02
acheronukat the moment, looks likely23:02
tsimonq2Not Lubuntu/23:02
* tsimonq2 whistles23:02
jbichamy opinion is that it would be good to announce dropping i386 isos at the same as the LTS release so users don't upgrade to an unsupported path (assuming they read release notes)23:03
tsimonq2IMHO that's fine for individual flavors if they decide to do that.23:04
jbichaI also thought it would be good if ubuntu-release-upgrader would actively prevent users from upgrading i386 installs if the appropriate flavor metapackage were installed23:06
jbichaI guess some people think that's too aggressive though23:06
acheronuka warning that requires positive input to get past then?23:07
tsimonq2It should be up to the flavors, really.23:07
tsimonq2If a flavor wants to kill i386, let them do that.23:07
jbichawith my proposal, it's still possible to install i386 flavors; it just needs to be done manually23:09
* Odd_Bloke started work on ruby-tinder earlier, too.23:33
Odd_BlokeFYI.23:34

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!