[01:26] * wxl sighs [01:26] looks like we're not going to have a beta unless people start testing [05:54] @wxl, honestly i'm searching for the mail, but regarding the testing you mean the testcase in the ISO tracker right? [05:54] @fbnbmns, http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/387/builds [05:55] @tsimonq2, great, thx a bunch! will start today afternoon. 🙂 i guess tonight i should have the first results. [06:01] seems like the 'default window manager' bug is affecting Lubuntu Next 64-bit. [06:01] *as well. [06:04] @fbnbmns, It's known. [06:04] If you can find a workaround, that would be awesome, but for now, let's focus on main Lubuntu :) [07:16] @tsimonq2, Alright! :) [08:34] I can start working on sth after tmrw [08:35] SAT is such a pain [10:29] GWEN BIANTONG was added by: GWEN BIANTONG [11:04] @GWEN BIANTONG, Welcome :) [16:29] Beta 1 is waiting on lubuntu [16:45] @acheronuk we've been struggling to get testing done. Maybe we'll just have to skip it. I'll confer with @tsimonq2 [16:46] wxl[m]: yeh. I looked to see if it was just one or 2 cases I could fill in, but you have quite a lot missing [16:49] acheronuk: yep and I've tried several times to summon help, too. [16:51] Needless to say this does tend to give some credence to the notion of getting rid of milestones. [16:53] it does. I'm conflicted about that, but can't deny it [16:55] The more I think about it, the more I like it [16:56] flavours having a monthly iso test day sounds quite good [17:02] wxl, acheronuk: That's a proposal I'll make Soon [18:14] can anyone confirm this? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1754174 [18:14] Launchpad bug 1754174 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "[Lubuntu] 'Install Lubuntu' fails with several commands not found and permission denied" [Critical, Confirmed] [18:14] acheronuk: ^^ if that's a real thing, i think we can safely say, forget the beta altogether [18:14] i think it's likely to not be true, presonally [18:15] It sounds a little implausible [18:19] or maybe not! [18:29] -queuebot:#lubuntu-devel- Builds: Lubuntu Alternate amd64 [Bionic Beta 1] has been disabled [18:29] -queuebot:#lubuntu-devel- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop amd64 [Bionic Beta 1] has been disabled [18:29] -queuebot:#lubuntu-devel- Builds: Lubuntu Next Desktop amd64 [Bionic Beta 1] has been disabled [18:29] -queuebot:#lubuntu-devel- Builds: Lubuntu Alternate i386 [Bionic Beta 1] has been disabled [18:29] -queuebot:#lubuntu-devel- Builds: Lubuntu Next Desktop i386 [Bionic Beta 1] has been disabled [18:29] -queuebot:#lubuntu-devel- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop i386 [Bionic Beta 1] has been disabled [18:40] acheronuk: maybe not? [18:41] wxl: as it sounds well confirmed before I could get the iso downloaded, going from people in release hitting the bug on 1st try [18:41] but only on lubuntu? wth [18:45] going to give it a try. it does seem weird [18:51] and it crashes [18:51] weird [18:51] i think it's time to call it, tsimonq2 [18:51] wxl: I already did like 15 mins ago. [18:52] ok good. wasn't clear. [18:53] is it grub/isolinux or something else that does that boot choice menu? [18:53] as I think lubuntu is the only one that does an install launch direct from that? [18:53] i thought we boot to desktop first, just as kubuntu does [18:54] it just autoloads ubiquity [18:55] kubuntu launchs X, then does the ubiquity try/install [18:55] that's what i thought lubuntu did too [18:56] https://i.imgur.com/dOWt2BD.png [18:57] Kubuntu does not have an install option there [18:57] hm [18:58] in fact, we don't even see that menu unless you press a key [19:00] well it looks like investigating that is next on our list [19:00] * wxl sighs [19:02] * acheronuk waits for tsimonq2 to mention calamares [22:25] (2225*(1-.67)) [22:25] oops [22:26] O.o? [22:26] 734.25 😐