[01:26]  * wxl sighs
[01:26] <wxl> looks like we're not going to have a beta unless people start testing
 @wxl, honestly i'm searching for the mail, but regarding the testing you mean the testcase in the ISO tracker right?
 @fbnbmns, http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/387/builds
 @tsimonq2, great, thx a bunch! will start today afternoon. 🙂 i guess tonight i should have the first results.
 seems like the 'default window manager' bug is affecting Lubuntu Next 64-bit.
 *as well.
 @fbnbmns, It's known.
 If you can find a workaround, that would be awesome, but for now, let's focus on main Lubuntu :)
 @tsimonq2, Alright! :)
 @GWEN BIANTONG, Welcome :)
 Beta 1 is waiting on lubuntu
[16:45] <wxl[m]> @acheronuk we've been struggling to get testing done. Maybe we'll just have to skip it. I'll confer with @tsimonq2
[16:46] <acheronuk> wxl[m]: yeh. I looked to see if it was just one or 2 cases I could fill in, but you have quite a lot missing
[16:49] <wxl[m]> acheronuk: yep and I've tried several times to summon help, too.
[16:51] <wxl[m]> Needless to say this does tend to give some credence to the notion of getting rid of milestones.
[16:53] <acheronuk> it does. I'm conflicted about that, but can't deny it
[16:55] <wxl[m]> The more I think about it, the more I like it
[16:56] <acheronuk> flavours having a monthly iso test day sounds quite good
 wxl, acheronuk: That's a proposal I'll make Soon
[18:14] <wxl> can anyone confirm this? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1754174
[18:14] <wxl> acheronuk: ^^ if that's a real thing, i think we can safely say, forget the beta altogether
[18:14] <wxl> i think it's likely to not be true, presonally
[18:15] <acheronuk> It sounds a little implausible
[18:19] <acheronuk> or maybe not!
[18:29] -queuebot:#lubuntu-devel- Builds: Lubuntu Alternate amd64 [Bionic Beta 1] has been disabled
[18:29] -queuebot:#lubuntu-devel- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop amd64 [Bionic Beta 1] has been disabled
[18:29] -queuebot:#lubuntu-devel- Builds: Lubuntu Next Desktop amd64 [Bionic Beta 1] has been disabled
[18:29] -queuebot:#lubuntu-devel- Builds: Lubuntu Alternate i386 [Bionic Beta 1] has been disabled
[18:29] -queuebot:#lubuntu-devel- Builds: Lubuntu Next Desktop i386 [Bionic Beta 1] has been disabled
[18:29] -queuebot:#lubuntu-devel- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop i386 [Bionic Beta 1] has been disabled
[18:40] <wxl> acheronuk: maybe not?
[18:41] <acheronuk> wxl: as it sounds well confirmed before I could get the iso downloaded, going from people in release hitting the bug on 1st try
[18:41] <wxl> but only on lubuntu? wth
[18:45] <acheronuk> going to give it a try. it does seem weird
[18:51] <acheronuk> and it crashes
[18:51] <wxl> weird
[18:51] <wxl> i think it's time to call it, tsimonq2 
[18:51] <tsimonq2> wxl: I already did like 15 mins ago.
[18:52] <wxl> ok good. wasn't clear.
[18:53] <acheronuk> is it grub/isolinux or something else that does that boot choice menu?
[18:53] <acheronuk> as I think lubuntu is the only one that does an install launch direct from that?
[18:53] <wxl> i thought we boot to desktop first, just as kubuntu does
[18:54] <wxl> it just autoloads ubiquity
[18:55] <acheronuk> kubuntu launchs X, then does the ubiquity try/install
[18:55] <wxl> that's what i thought lubuntu did too
[18:56] <acheronuk> https://i.imgur.com/dOWt2BD.png
[18:57] <acheronuk> Kubuntu does not have an install option there
[18:57] <wxl> hm
[18:58] <acheronuk> in fact, we don't even see that menu unless you press a key
[19:00] <wxl> well it looks like investigating that is next on our list
[19:00]  * wxl sighs
[19:02]  * acheronuk waits for tsimonq2 to mention calamares
[22:25] <wxl> (2225*(1-.67))
[22:25] <wxl> oops
 O.o?
 734.25 😐