=== strive is now known as paragon | ||
=== paragon is now known as strive | ||
=== strive is now known as parag0n | ||
=== parag0n is now known as strive | ||
=== exxxit is now known as doublehelix | ||
=== strive is now known as par4g0n | ||
=== robot is now known as uptime | ||
=== exxxit is now known as doublehelix | ||
OpenTokix | soahccc: dd /dev/zero is more then enough. | 06:57 |
---|---|---|
OpenTokix | soahccc: There is even papers on it | 06:57 |
OpenTokix | soahccc: or /dev/urandom if you want to wait longer | 06:57 |
yutaka-m | I have an issue, that Japanese and Chinese are not displayed in the installer of ubuntu-server (bionic) daily build March 6th iso image. And, should I where to report? thank you for your read. | 07:01 |
lordievader | Good morning | 07:01 |
=== tobasco|away is now known as tobasco | ||
xnox | rharper, for the dhcpclient pivot to root, would it be sufficient to continue running dhcpclint from the initramfs, post pivot? or for example continue running dhcplient post-pivot, in addition to / in competition to netwokrd? | 09:14 |
xnox | rharper, is there a MAAS bug you mentioned, w.r.t. recovery on bionic? | 09:15 |
rharper | smoser: ^ | 09:15 |
xnox | things will not be killed post pivot if their argv[0] is @ | 09:15 |
* xnox <3 hacks & cookies | 09:15 | |
smoser | dhcp in the initramfs is klibc | 09:16 |
smoser | which does nothing but one shot | 09:16 |
smoser | if you wanted to run dhclient, that might be sane | 09:16 |
smoser | but you'd have to deal with moving its open file handles and such over | 09:16 |
xnox | ugh | 09:16 |
smoser | you can probalby run it in the initramfs in a way that it writes its leases to /run/ | 09:16 |
smoser | but that doesnt happen now. | 09:17 |
xnox | ack | 09:17 |
xnox | or just generate /run/systemd/network/*.network file which basically says to dhcp | 09:17 |
xnox | but name it zzzz-something.network | 09:17 |
xnox | such that if and when nplan/real networking config is generate it takes priority | 09:17 |
xnox | as _only_ the first matching .network file is in effect | 09:18 |
xnox | (alphanumerical ordering as per systemd(tm) algorithm - patent pending) | 09:18 |
smoser | that seemed like it could work. | 09:19 |
xnox | smoser, rharper - cause when maas recovery / emergency was mentioned.... was that far enough in the boot, that e.g. networkd was actually available? | 09:28 |
saban | is there a bug that i cant add secondary dns to interfaces? im using dns-nameservers 8.8.8.8 8.8.4.4 and when i restart network or ivn reboot in resolv.conf only shows first dns? | 15:29 |
saban | ubuntu 16.04 server | 15:29 |
TJ- | saban: where are you adding that option? | 15:32 |
saban | ./etc/network/interfaces | 15:32 |
TJ- | you've definitely got an 's' on the end of dns-nameservers? no dns-nameserver ? | 15:37 |
saban | yes dns-nameservers 127.0.0.1 10.0.0.230 | 15:40 |
saban | i tride ivn this add nameserver 127.0.0.1 nameserver 8.8.8.8 in file /etc/resolvconf/resolv.conf.d/base | 15:42 |
saban | and secondary gets ignored | 15:43 |
TJ- | saban: as I recall, ifupdown has scripts hooked by resolvconf via /etc/resolvconf/update.d/ or related directories which handle it | 15:43 |
adylas | Hello, Is ubuntu can be used as L1 (First level of VM) in a nested virtualization setup ? I'm having hard time to enable it to spin up another KVM instance ("Hardware not found") | 17:02 |
compdoc | run a vm inside a vm guest? | 17:05 |
sdeziel | adylas: should work. What do you get when running "egrep -c '(vmx|svm)' /proc/cpuinfo" inside the VM? | 17:07 |
adylas | sdeziel, Hi, nothing. The L1 (Ubuntu 16.04) is not unaware. | 17:31 |
adylas | *is _not_ aware | 17:32 |
sdeziel | adylas: if your host has an intel CPU, make sure it has the nested param enable (it does by default) | 17:33 |
sdeziel | adylas: also check that your VM's CPU allow passing the required flags (vmx or svm) | 17:33 |
sdeziel | adylas: "<cpu mode='host-passthrough'>" should do it | 17:34 |
adylas | Yeah, its ovirt, its supported in there and my hypervisor has kvm-intel.nested=1 | 17:34 |
adylas | sdeziel, Is this in the config of the L1 guest ? Or the L2 guest ? | 17:34 |
sdeziel | adylas: the nested param needs to be enabled in the host. The first layer of virtualization (L1) needs the right CPU flag. | 17:36 |
adylas | sdeziel, interesting | 17:36 |
sdeziel | adylas: the L2 shouldn't need anything special AFAIK | 17:36 |
adylas | sdeziel, The hook did the trick. This one : https://github.com/oVirt/vdsm/blob/master/vdsm_hooks/nestedvt/before_vm_start.py | 18:05 |
adylas | Thanks for your help !! | 18:05 |
sdeziel | adylas: great | 18:06 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!