[00:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python3-antlr3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.5.2-4] (no packageset)
[01:50] <handsome_feng> Hi, I'll appreciate it if someone could help to have a look at the ukwm in bionic new queue. Thank you in advance! LP: #1740252
[01:50] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 1740252 in Ubuntu Kylin "[FFe] ukwm" [Critical,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1740252
[02:01] <foka> ginggs, thank you very much for retriggering the autopkgtests for golang-blackfriday/hugo/golang-github-chaseadamsio-goorgeous!
[02:05] <foka> ginggs, as to where I went (haha), I rebooted my laptop to a pre-release daily build of Lubuntu that my friend installed on a new SSD he purchased.  He got the SSD on-sale for a local weekend Chinese school, but the first one died soon after installing Zorin OS on it (became unwritable), so he returned it and got another one, and this time I recommended Lubuntu (for an older computer).  He asked me to run some more tests to make sure the
[02:05] <foka> SSD is OK this time.  Then there was a long retreat at our church today, so I was gone pretty much the whole day.
[02:05] <foka> (I know, I should have gotten my IRC proxy back up and running, or get IRC working on my Android phone, but I was either too busy or too lazy, haha!
[02:06] <foka> I did get your messages through https://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2018/03/11/%23ubuntu-release.html though, so, thank you again!  ;-)
[02:06] <foka> I can go close https://github.com/gohugoio/hugo/issues/4350 now.  Thanks for helping getting the most recent and most stable version of Hugo into bionic!
[02:15] <foka> handsome_feng, for FFe Sync requests, it might be easier if you had used the "requestsync" command...
[02:15] <foka> handsome_feng, Oh wait, ukwm isn't in Debian yet!?  Why not?
[02:22] <handsome_feng> foka: We are currently focusing on the Ubuntu platform, and the man who responsible for the uploads of new UKUI packages to Debian lost his gpg key, which led to the lag of plan...
[02:23] <foka> handsome_feng, Nevertheless, for an "FFe", it seems you have forgotten to subscribe the ubuntu-release team to the bug.
[02:24] <handsome_feng> Oh, Thanks! :)
[02:24] <foka> handsome_feng: What!?  How did your team member lose his GPG key?
[02:24] <foka> handsome_feng: Anyhow, if you need a sponsor for uploading to Debian, you can bug me.  ;-)
[02:27] <foka> handsome_feng, about LP: 1740252, I think it would raise more attention if you mention that Ukwm is to become the *official* window manager for Ubuntu Kylin in bionic.
[02:27] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 1740252 in Ubuntu Kylin "[FFe] ukwm" [Critical,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1740252
[02:29] <handsome_feng> foka: I don't know the details, :(. Thank you for your help! and sorry for that I am a bit slow to reply.
[02:30] <foka> handsome_feng, 没关系！你们那边现在星期一了吧？一定是很忙。 No worries!  It must be Monday already in China, right?  You must be busy.
[02:32] <handsome_feng> foka:woooh, your chinese is excellent. Not because it's busy, It is I am looking up the dictionary. :P
[02:33] <foka> handsome_feng, 我是中国人……或者是中国香港人。
[02:33] <handsome_feng> foka: 哇, 开心得流眼泪!
[06:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python3-antlr3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [3.5.2-4]
[06:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wsmancli [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [2.6.0-0ubuntu1]
[06:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wsmancli [i386] (bionic-proposed) [2.6.0-0ubuntu1]
[06:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wsmancli [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [2.6.0-0ubuntu1]
[06:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wsmancli [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [2.6.0-0ubuntu1]
[06:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wsmancli [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [2.6.0-0ubuntu1]
[06:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wsmancli [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [2.6.0-0ubuntu1]
[08:37] <LocutusOfBorg> hello release team this is something I think might be beneficial for everybody... what about grouping this page for year? http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/auto-sync/
[08:37] <LocutusOfBorg> having all the days since 2014 in the same page is... strange
[09:02] <apw> LocutusOfBorg, i tend to use http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/auto-sync/?C=N;O=D to have the useful ones right there and not worry
[09:12] <LocutusOfBorg> apw, yes I know, but doing a "mkdir 2014; mv 2014* 2014" and so on, at least until 2017 might make the package more readable and faster loadable
[09:12] <LocutusOfBorg> we can keep all the 2018 entries, but I don't think people needs older years, at least in the "homepage"
[09:12]  * LocutusOfBorg finished his fast-internet mobile plan monthly queue, so will load that page at 128kb for some more days :p
[09:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: llvm-defaults [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.41~exp4] (no packageset)
[09:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: llvm-defaults [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.41~exp4] (no packageset)
[09:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: llvm-defaults [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.41~exp4] (no packageset)
[09:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: llvm-defaults [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.41~exp4] (no packageset)
[09:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: llvm-defaults [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.41~exp4] (no packageset)
[09:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: llvm-defaults [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.41~exp4] (no packageset)
[09:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted llvm-defaults [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [0.41~exp4]
[09:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted llvm-defaults [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [0.41~exp4]
[09:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted llvm-defaults [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [0.41~exp4]
[09:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted llvm-defaults [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [0.41~exp4]
[09:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted llvm-defaults [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [0.41~exp4]
[09:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted llvm-defaults [i386] (bionic-proposed) [0.41~exp4]
[11:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [amd64] (artful-proposed) [2.02~beta3-4ubuntu7.3]
[11:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [arm64] (artful-proposed) [2.02~beta3-4ubuntu7.3]
[11:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox [source] (artful-proposed) [5.1.34-dfsg-0ubuntu1.17.10.1]
[11:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox-guest-additions-iso [source] (artful-proposed) [5.1.34-0ubuntu1.17.10.1]
[11:27] <sil2100> LocutusOfBorg: hey! You around? Looking at the artful virtualbox-ext-pack now and I see something I'd like to double confirm
[11:28] <sil2100> LocutusOfBorg: in debian/postinst there's version=5.1.32 while the version of the package is 5.1.34 - is that ok?
[11:28] <sil2100> LocutusOfBorg: same for debian/rules
[11:39] <doko> apw: is the linux autopkg test failure rectified? blocks binutils
[11:40] <apw> why does it block binutils ?
[11:40] <apw> we should have stopped using libbfd
[11:44] <doko> the use of libbfd doesn't affect the autopkg test
[11:52] <apw> doko, oh the s390x thing, i think that is ok, but i will poke seth to confirm
[12:56] <acheronuk> mwhudson: I may have a fix for casper re:kubuntu live session. if it tests of, where and how would be best to submit? bug with a debdiff?
[12:57] <acheronuk> *tests ok
[13:12] <cyphermox> acheronuk: yes
[13:12] <acheronuk> ok. thx
[13:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: neutron (artful-proposed/main) [2:11.0.2-0ubuntu1.1 => 2:11.0.2-0ubuntu1.3] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[14:01] <sforshee> doko, apw: the linux s390x failure is indeed ok, just a change to the content of /proc/kallsyms that will get changed back in the next upload
[14:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: neutron (xenial-proposed/main) [2:8.4.0-0ubuntu6 => 2:8.4.0-0ubuntu7.1] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[14:39] <apw> Laney, are you about, i am hearing the ppc64el jobs in bionic might be looping, for the kernel
[14:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox [source] (xenial-proposed) [5.1.34-dfsg-0ubuntu1.16.04.1]
[14:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox-hwe [source] (xenial-proposed) [5.1.34-dfsg-0ubuntu1.16.04.1]
[15:00] <xnox> slangasek, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-scopes-api/+bug/1755184 looks like it is ready to be removed, with an ack from seb.
[15:00] <ubot5`> Ubuntu bug 1755184 in unity-scopes-api (Ubuntu) "RM: obsolete product" [High,Triaged]
[15:20] <LocutusOfBorg> sil2100, thanks for vbox, please look at my reply wrt ext-pack, and also accept kbuild/xenial to make it build!
[15:22] <sil2100> Yeah, in progress! Got preempted with DMB meeting...
[15:27] <LocutusOfBorg> oooh sorry! I though it was a problem in my process
[15:42] <LocutusOfBorg> people, AA, please KICK OUT node-rollup-plugin-commonjs from bionic-proposed
[15:42] <LocutusOfBorg> it is not built, so I hope doable with not much effort
[15:42] <LocutusOfBorg> I'm trying to rollup-bootstrap-rollup-and-itself-changing-bits, and discovered #892742
[15:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libzstd [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.3.3+dfsg-2ubuntu1] (ubuntustudio)
[15:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libzstd [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.3.3+dfsg-2ubuntu1] (ubuntustudio)
[15:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libzstd [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.3.3+dfsg-2ubuntu1] (ubuntustudio)
[15:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libzstd [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.3.3+dfsg-2ubuntu1] (ubuntustudio)
[15:56] <xnox> apw, slangasek, sil2100 - ^^^^ should unbreak btrfs-progs, as these need a libzstd1-udeb. Also package is fixed up to be in a good shape for MIR.
[15:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libzstd [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.3.3+dfsg-2ubuntu1] (ubuntustudio)
[15:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kbuild [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:0.1.9998svn2814+dfsg-2~ubuntu16.04.1]
[16:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libzstd [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.3.3+dfsg-2ubuntu1] (ubuntustudio)
[16:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox-guest-additions-iso [source] (xenial-proposed) [5.1.34-0ubuntu1.16.04.1]
[16:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox-ext-pack [source] (artful-proposed) [5.1.34-0ubuntu1.17.10.1]
[16:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox-ext-pack [source] (xenial-proposed) [5.1.34-0ubuntu1.16.04.1]
[16:21] <doko> apw, sforshee: please could you update the hint then?
[16:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libzstd [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [1.3.3+dfsg-2ubuntu1]
[16:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libzstd [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [1.3.3+dfsg-2ubuntu1]
[16:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libzstd [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [1.3.3+dfsg-2ubuntu1]
[16:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libzstd [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [1.3.3+dfsg-2ubuntu1]
[16:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libzstd [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [1.3.3+dfsg-2ubuntu1]
[16:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libzstd [i386] (bionic-proposed) [1.3.3+dfsg-2ubuntu1]
[16:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected python-pylxd [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.0.7-0ubuntu1]
[16:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected proftpd-dfsg [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.3.5a-1.1]
[16:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected neutron [source] (xenial-proposed) [2:8.4.0-0ubuntu7]
[16:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected neutron [source] (artful-proposed) [2:11.0.2-0ubuntu1.2]
[16:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected zfs-linux [source] (artful-proposed) [0.6.5.11-1ubuntu3.2]
[17:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted zfs-linux [source] (artful-proposed) [0.6.5.11-1ubuntu3.2]
[18:40] <jbicha> slangasek: please add /i386 to the end of this changed line (so we don't ignore all LO/bionic autopkgtest results) https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-release/britney/hints-ubuntu/revision/2900
[19:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted proftpd-dfsg [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.3.5a-1ubuntu0.1]
[19:46] <acheronuk> slangasek or infinity: could we maybe get an ack on this? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plasma-framework/+bug/1754825
[19:46] <ubot5`> Ubuntu bug 1754825 in plasma-framework (Ubuntu Bionic) "[FFe] KDE Frameworks 5.44.0 into the Bionic Archive" [Undecided,Confirmed]
[19:46] <tsimonq2> +1
[19:48] <infinity> acheronuk: ACKed in the bug.
[19:48] <acheronuk> infinity: superb. thanks you :)
[19:49] <acheronuk> *thank
[19:49] <estan> hi all. would it be possible for you folks to merge into artful c-blosc 1.14.0 from debian, once it hits unstable? i recently reported this to the debian maintainer and he was kind enough to quickly make a new package: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/c-blosc/merge_requests/1
[19:51] <estan> the problem with the 1.11.1 version that is currently in unstable is that it's one of the "bad apple" versions that accidently broke forward compatibility with all older versions of the library.
[19:52] <estan> (the upstream author has fixed it in 1.14.0, and also blogged about the incident here: http://blosc.org/posts/new-forward-compat-policy/)
[20:04] <estan> err, s/artful/bionic/
[20:16] <nacc> estan: have you filed  abug in ubuntu?
[20:22] <slangasek> xnox: thanks, LP: #1755184 done
[20:22] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 1755184 in unity-scopes-api (Ubuntu) "RM: obsolete product" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1755184
[20:22] <slangasek> jbicha: hint adjusted; btw I'm puzzled by the libreoffice results against dconf, showing "ignored failure"s that didn't match any of the versioned hints
[20:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dh-runit [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.7.1] (no packageset)
[20:36] <estan> nacc: ah no. i guess i should do that. i just wasn't sure if it'll automatically trickle out to ubuntu, now that i set it in motion in debian. but i guess i should file an ubuntu bug to hurry it along.
[20:40] <nacc> estan: we're after debian import freeze
[21:17] <tsimonq2> OK, so what is going on here? Lubuntu's images aren't picking up our ship-live-share seed when it
[21:17] <tsimonq2> *it's explicitly included in lp:ubuntu-cdimage.
[21:20] <tsimonq2> Er, OK, so it's pulling the seed in, but it isn't installing most of the packages that are in here...
[21:21] <tsimonq2> e.g. grepping the manifest doesn't return lvm2.
[21:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: prison-kf5 [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.44.0-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[21:22] <tsimonq2> Er, I'm dumb.
[21:22] <tsimonq2> Now to see if this bug is *actually* legitimate... >_<
[21:22] <tsimonq2> Thanks for the rubber ducky I guess
[21:25] <wxl> tsimonq2: which bug are you on about it again?
[21:26] <tsimonq2> wxl: LVM installs not working.
[21:26] <tsimonq2> If that works fine, my next thing is figuring out why in the heck encrypted LVM installs still try to assign unencrypted swap and then just error out...
[21:26] <foka> Hi tsimonq2!  This might be off-topic, but after installing LibreOffice on Lubuntu bionic i386 daily live image, lowriter does not start properly.  No such problem on Lbuntu amd64 bionic.  (I probably should file a bug, but I'll need to reproduce it first and get some more data, haha)  By the way, Lubuntu works great!  It is *lighting* fast!  Thank you for your great work!
[21:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: prison-kf5 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.44.0-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[21:27] <tsimonq2> foka: Let's move this to #lubuntu :)
[21:27] <tsimonq2> But thanks :D
[21:27] <foka> tsimonq2, Good idea!
[21:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: prison-kf5 [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.44.0-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[21:36] <wxl> tsimonq2: interesting that the ubiquity issue seems to be something about lvm, even though adam calls it a red herring
[21:37] <tsimonq2> wxl: I'm working on something unrelated.
[21:37] <tsimonq2> Yeah, waaaaaaaat, LVM install fails...
[21:38] <infinity> wxl: It has nothing to do with lvm.
[21:38] <infinity> tsimonq2: lvm2 installs will indeed fail, but not related to the other issue.
[21:38] <infinity> (And easily solved)
[21:39] <tsimonq2> infinity: So, can ya give me a hint? ;)
[21:39] <tsimonq2> lvm2 is indeed installed
[21:40] <infinity> wxl: No it's not.
[21:40] <infinity> Err.
[21:40] <infinity> tsimonq2: No it's not. :P
[21:40] <tsimonq2> Err.
[21:40] <tsimonq2> What?
[21:40] <tsimonq2> infinity: So... why?
[21:40] <infinity> What makes you think it is?
[21:40] <infinity> ship-live != live.
[21:40] <tsimonq2> It's in the ISO pool.
[21:40] <tsimonq2> Oh.
[21:40] <infinity> Having a deb in a pool isn't the same as having it installed.
[21:40] <tsimonq2> Maybe that... yeah.
[21:40] <tsimonq2> Duh. :)
[21:41] <tsimonq2> I'll... do the thing.
[21:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: prison-kf5 [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.44.0-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[21:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: prison-kf5 [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.44.0-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[21:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: prison-kf5 [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.44.0-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[21:41] <infinity> That said, it should probably be in live-common if it's needed.
[21:41] <infinity> So, hold up on hacking around in your seeds.
[21:41] <tsimonq2> OK.
[21:41] <tsimonq2> (And why in the heck is the option even available if lvm2 isn't installed? lolwat)
[21:41] <infinity> It's possible that ubiquity should also depend on it instead of recommending, but happy to just seed it in common for now.
[21:42] <infinity> ubiquity probably should do a better job of hiding that option if lvm2 isn't there, *or* not making it optional.
[21:43] <infinity> Although, we already seed-instead-of-depend for xfsutils, jfsutils, etc, so I guess there's precedent here.
[21:44] <infinity> tsimonq2: Committed.  And you probably don't need it in ship-live.
[21:44] <tsimonq2> infinity: ACK.
[21:46] <tsimonq2> infinity: Oh yeah, and Ubiquity lolwats at encrypted LVM because "Unsafe swap detected" so it still wants to do a thing with swap when that option's selected. I don't know yet if it's Just A Lubuntu Thing or a global thing, but ideas on fixing it would be cool.
[22:08] <tsimonq2> Oh great, so it's just a Lubuntu thing.
[22:08] <tsimonq2> Fun.
[22:42] <tsimonq2> infinity: Oh, duh, the problem is that Lubuntu uses zram and Ubiquity thinks that it's a security risk (but it really ain't).
[22:42] <tsimonq2> Let me see if I can throw you a patch.
[22:55] <tsimonq2> Actually, it's partman-auto-crypto that seems to be doing the weird stuff.