| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cross-toolchain-base-ports [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [18ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) | 00:04 | |
| tjaalton | slangasek: yes, it needs nss-pem which needs some static nss libs packaged to build | 04:40 |
|---|---|---|
| tjaalton | glandium refuses to package them, so i was thinking of taking it to the tech-ctte | 04:46 |
| tjaalton | but if the tests are blocking stuff, just ignore them for now.. | 05:02 |
| slangasek | tjaalton: so nss-pem is only needed for the tests? | 05:22 |
| tjaalton | slangasek: no, it's needed for server install to pass | 05:28 |
| tjaalton | and useful on the client too, since certmonger needs it | 05:29 |
| tjaalton | when renewing certificates | 05:29 |
| slangasek | well, then I'm not sure there's a point in ignoring the test failures to get the package into release... since these are the test failures | 05:30 |
| tjaalton | not freeipa itself, I thought it's blocking other things | 05:31 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cross-toolchain-base-ports [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [18ubuntu1] | 05:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xorg-lts-transitional [source] (bionic-proposed) [3:14] | 05:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xorg-lts-transitional [amd64] (bionic-proposed/none) [3:14] (no packageset) | 05:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xorg-lts-transitional [arm64] (bionic-proposed/none) [3:14] (no packageset) | 05:46 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xorg-lts-transitional [i386] (bionic-proposed/none) [3:14] (no packageset) | 05:46 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xorg-lts-transitional [armhf] (bionic-proposed/none) [3:14] (no packageset) | 05:46 | |
| slangasek | tjaalton: not anymore, no | 05:47 |
| tjaalton | okay | 05:48 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xorg-lts-transitional [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/none) [3:14] (no packageset) | 06:07 | |
| tjaalton | cyphermox: any update on the review of pysmi/pycryptodome? bug 1748572 | 06:12 |
| ubot5` | bug 1748572 in pysmi (Ubuntu) "[MIR] pysmi, pycryptodome" [High,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1748572 | 06:12 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xorg-lts-transitional [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [3:14] | 06:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xorg-lts-transitional [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [3:14] | 06:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xorg-lts-transitional [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [3:14] | 06:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xorg-lts-transitional [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [3:14] | 06:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xorg-lts-transitional [i386] (bionic-proposed) [3:14] | 06:21 | |
| estan | infinity: ah, bugger. | 06:44 |
| estan | infinity: i'll have a go at those crashes when i'm at work, and i've alerted upstream (https://github.com/Blosc/c-blosc/issues/223) | 07:01 |
| estan | it's strange that the armhf debian build succeeded fine though. | 07:05 |
| infinity | estan: If Debian's works and ours doesn't, there's a fair chance the issues are alignment-related. | 07:12 |
| infinity | estan: Debian runs on ARMv7 hardware with alignment fixups at runtime. We run on ARMv8 hardware that falls over on unaligned access with ARMv7 code. | 07:13 |
| infinity | estan: 9 times out of 10, that'll be a SIGBUS, not a SIGSEGV, but when you do it just wrong, segfaults occur, so my bet's on that. | 07:14 |
| tjaalton | is LP selective with it's debian mirror? some packages seem to not have "been picked up by LP yet", while newer ones have | 07:16 |
| infinity | estan: Upshot of caring about unaligned access is that it'll be a (very minor) performance increase on even x86 for upstream to fix it. :P | 07:16 |
| infinity | tjaalton: You want wgrant or cjwatson. | 07:17 |
| infinity | tjaalton: (and probably #launchpad, not here, but meh) | 07:18 |
| tjaalton | ok | 07:20 |
| estan | infinity: ah ok. thanks for the input. i'm sure it's that then. the upstream author has also been sloppy with endianness in the past, so i wouldn't put alignment issues past him :) i see the failures are in the tests related to the shuffling that blosc does, where i think he twiddles around with bytes/bits. | 08:31 |
| cjwatson | infinity: are you still working on that dpkg SRU for .asc files in format 1.0? IIRC that's what tjaalton's problem is about | 08:34 |
| tjaalton | filed FFE bug 1755717 for xcb-proto/libxcb | 08:49 |
| ubot5` | bug 1755717 in xcb-proto (Ubuntu) "FFE: xcb-proto/libxcb 1.13" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1755717 | 08:49 |
| LocutusOfBorg | sil2100, good morning, seems that in less than 12h we got already a lot of happy people wrt vbox stack, and zero new bug founds | 09:41 |
| LocutusOfBorg | (except for one reporting the issue fixed in -proposed, marked as duplicate) | 09:41 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I'll redo all the tests today | 09:41 |
| sil2100 | LocutusOfBorg: \o/ thanks! | 10:04 |
| rbalint | juliank: re: zstd for initramfs: sure, let's measure boot speed with it and lz4 and add support for the best | 11:09 |
| rbalint | juliank: imo decompression time is way more important than size in initramfs case | 11:10 |
| juliank | rbalint: there's no kernel support yet, we were a bit optimistic yesterday :( | 11:22 |
| rbasak | It's great that you're working on this. | 11:23 |
| rbasak | But I think it's premature for Bionic. | 11:23 |
| rbalint | juliank: :-) | 11:23 |
| rbasak | If we hit a zstd edge case in initramfs unpack that causes failure, we'll have broken users with no automatic way for them to recover. | 11:23 |
| juliank | _I_ never said anything about doing that this cycle :D | 11:24 |
| juliank | the kernel patches from october or november have not been reviewed yet AFAICT | 11:25 |
| juliank | probably the submitter should resend them | 11:25 |
| juliank | If we want to do something _now_, it would be adding support for lz4 I guess. | 11:25 |
| apw | juliank, as in mainline has not yet taken them ? | 11:26 |
| juliank | no maintainer has responded to them | 11:26 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.4.0-117.141] (core, kernel) | 11:26 | |
| juliank | https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10003007/ | 11:27 |
| juliank | https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10003011/ | 11:27 |
| juliank | 2017-10-12 these are the latest oners | 11:27 |
| juliank | *ones I could find | 11:27 |
| juliank | I guess I'll ping him and ask for a status update | 11:32 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.4.0-117.141] | 11:36 | |
| infinity | cjwatson: Oh. Yes. Yes I am. By which I mean I wasn't, but I will today. | 11:45 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-themes (xenial-proposed/main) [14.04+16.04.20171116-0ubuntu1 => 14.04+16.04.20180307-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) (sync) | 15:05 | |
| xnox | AAs old binaries left on amd64: kernel-signed-image-4.15.0-11-generic-di, linux-signed-image-4.15.0-11-generic, linux-signed-image-4.15.0-11-lowlatency (from 4.15.0-11.12) | 15:33 |
| xnox | please clean up bionic-proposed, from un-migrated kernel udebs | 15:33 |
| apw | xnox, looking | 15:41 |
| apw | xnox, wacked | 15:49 |
| apw | jamespage, percona-extradb-cluster-5.7 ... what is happening with that, is it replacing -5.6 ? | 16:10 |
| jamespage | apw: yep - raised a bug for the RM somewhere | 16:11 |
| jamespage | ubuntu-archive subbed | 16:11 |
| jamespage | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/percona-xtradb-cluster-5.6/+bug/1752373 | 16:11 |
| ubot5` | Ubuntu bug 1752373 in percona-xtradb-cluster-5.6 (Ubuntu) "[RM] replaced by percona-xtradb-cluster-5.7 package" [Undecided,New] | 16:11 |
| apw | jamespage, ahh ok, thanks | 16:13 |
| xnox | jamespage, what about https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/percona-server-5.7 ? is that coming? | 16:14 |
| xnox | and ditto percona-server-5.6 | 16:15 |
| apw | jamespage, and there is no issue with version skew with that and percona-server | 16:15 |
| jamespage | xnox: nope and I actually think we should drop ps-5.6 | 16:16 |
| jamespage | apw: there should not be - have a missed something? | 16:17 |
| apw | jamespage, no information here, just asking | 16:17 |
| jamespage | ack no should be fine | 16:17 |
| xnox | apw, i think cluster & server are standalone things; and do not depend on each other. | 16:17 |
| xnox | jamespage, please file RM for ps-5.6 then. Old / unmaintained / not-desired. | 16:18 |
| xnox | request of maintainer; or some such | 16:18 |
| apw | jamespage, ok, cleared out | 16:27 |
| jamespage | xnox: ack will do | 16:42 |
| jamespage | apw: ta | 16:42 |
| * jamespage feels fresher already | 16:42 | |
| slangasek | jbicha: gnome-calculator is showing up on component-mismatches, I see that's because you seeded it with "upgrades" as a rationale; but we don't normally retain packages in main with "upgrade" as a rationale. And the metapackage won't depend on them anymore. Was this discussed somewhere? | 17:42 |
| slangasek | jbicha: btw your bzr committer setting is missing a closing > | 17:42 |
| xnox | slangasek, i believe the package needs to be there, to perform deb -> snap migration no? | 17:43 |
| * xnox hopes there is no deb->snap complexities for gnome-calculator.... | 17:43 | |
| jbicha | bzr config fixed. I wonder how long that's been broken | 17:43 |
| slangasek | the commit doesn't mention migration, but lack thereof | 17:43 |
| jbicha | it was discussed briefly in #ubuntu-desktop today | 17:43 |
| jbicha | seb128: do you want to weigh in on gnome-calculator and friends? ^ | 17:44 |
| xnox | promoting it back in, is contrary to the existing practice. so yeah, it is interesting to know what's different about gnome-calculator. | 17:44 |
| jbicha | well there are 4 total apps, gnome-calculator was just the first one and the only one that had been fully demoted yet | 17:45 |
| jbicha | Laney: or you? ^ | 17:51 |
| Laney | yes we wanted to keep "officially" supporting those for upgraders | 17:59 |
| Laney | I think they won't be marked for autoremoval, and I'm not sure of a way to keep them installed via a metapackage but if there is one we could do that | 18:00 |
| Laney | supporting as deb -> snap isn't something we are doing for 18.04 | 18:00 |
| * Laney is going, hopefully Seb can give you more information if you want it | 18:05 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dpkg (xenial-proposed/main) [1.18.4ubuntu1.3 => 1.18.4ubuntu1.4] (core) | 19:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dpkg [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.18.4ubuntu1.4] | 19:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pciutils (xenial-proposed/main) [1:3.3.1-1.1ubuntu1.1 => 1:3.3.1-1.1ubuntu1.2] (core) | 21:00 | |
| doko | tempted to remove make-dfsg from proposed ... | 21:57 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: beets (bionic-proposed/primary) [1.4.6-2] | 23:55 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!