[01:08] nacc, retriggered all current regressions with all-proposed=1 which have ruby in the name, this should do it to clear up obvious things that are fixed. [02:54] xnox: thanks! [02:54] xnox: i'll pick it up in the morning [06:04] nacc, xnox: sorry. there were some unfullfillable b-d's needing >= 2.5.0 [07:13] tjaalton: xorg-lts-transitional has an invalid dependency. see excuses [07:15] doko: ok [07:16] ah === _cpaelzer is now known as cpaelzer [08:13] bdrung: hi, any news to bug 1753938 and the related upstreaming? [08:13] bug 1753938 in qemu (Ubuntu) "slirp: domainname and classic stateless for DHCP" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1753938 [08:14] hmm I should have read the bug updates before asking :-) [08:14] * cpaelzer ponders why this missed the important flag in his inbox [08:15] ok, so for now V3 is on its way [08:15] keep me in the loop bdrung [08:16] I made sure also the upstream thread shows up at the top of my inbox [08:16] lets see what the V3 review brings [08:39] I'm lokking for hint on side effects of adding a debian/.install file [08:39] my d/rules alwas had an override_dh_install that did dh_install and then some additional "install -m" calls [08:40] it did not have a debian/.install [08:40] I added the latter [08:40] and since then the "install -m" seem to fail on target dirs not being available [08:40] I wondere if adding a debian/.install did somehow stop it from creating those directories [08:41] (no .dirs file btw) [08:43] it is reproducible, I can take the debian/.install out and it works again [08:44] I can add a .dirs file to fix it, but I'd prefer to understand how the addition of the .install file affetcs the directory creation [08:48] for those interested to help, reproducible with: "pull-lp-source chrony; cd chrony-3.2/; echo "debian/README.Debian /usr" > debian/chrony.install; dpkg-buildpackage -S -nc -d; cd ..; DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=3 sbuild -Adbionic-LP-amd64 chrony_3.2-4ubuntu1.dsc" [08:48] or whatever your usual build setup is for the last step [08:52] the path I'm missing in the bad case is not mentioned at all in the good case, so it is hard to spot what creates it in the good case [08:53] ah found it [08:54] it is a single binary package package, so it has a install file and the .install obviously overrules that === bashfulrobot_ is now known as bashfulrobot === slashd- is now known as slashd === broder_ is now known as broder [11:51] So, I see that we have support for additional module signing keys in the kernel, but do we have support for signing dkms stuff automatically? === tyhicks` is now known as tyhicks === tyhicks is now known as Guest65850 === alan_g_ is now known as alan_g === thegodfather is now known as fabbione [12:41] I assume that the reason for the package Ganeti not being part of the bionic/18.04 release is, that not all archs on http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/ganeti pass the test? [12:42] coreycb, rbasak: is it correct that tomcat8 is getting demoted? [12:43] dpb1: ^ === NishanthMenon__ is now known as NishanthMenon [13:16] xnox: could you take a look at bug 1751797 ? [13:16] bug 1751797 in systemd (Ubuntu) "dns resolution only works for domains in 'search'." [Critical,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1751797 [13:16] It sure seems to me that this bug affects close to 100% of desktop users. I'm really surprised there isnt more screaming. [13:17] smoser, i am surprised too. [13:18] smoser, what's your $ systemd-resolve --status ? [13:18] do you have ~ in the search domain field? [13:18] smoser, is your router "normal" ISP provided thing, or some crazy custom firmware WRT? [13:19] smoser, and i guess i should move my desktop to use NM and check if i can reproduce this. [13:21] doko, your export DH_RUBY_IGNORE_TESTS=ruby2.3 ruby2.5 in debian/rules do not appear to affect the autopkgtest which are autodetected and autorun by gem2deb autodep8 === infinity1 is now known as infinity [13:22] doko, do you know how to make the packages ignore autopkgtest results too, not just build-time failures? [13:23] hm, looks like [13:23] test -f debian/ruby-tests.rake -o -f debian/ruby-tests.rb -o -f debian/ruby-test-files.yaml [13:23] is what generates it [13:26] xnox: posted to bug. [13:27] smoser, THANKS! [13:40] smoser, mine is similar http://paste.ubuntu.com/p/xS2vP87TGb/ and I do not have same problem =/ i use different domain and 192. addresses instead of 10. ; and I do not have extra route to 169. [13:40] xnox: sorry, no. ask #debian-ruby? === Guest65850 is now known as tyhicks === tyhicks is now known as Guest1006 [13:53] smoser, can i please get $ nmcli c show 72c7fac3-c017-4b76-9954-b4fb08262376 [13:54] 181 /* If this link is never the default (e.g. only used for resources on this [13:54] 182 * network) add a routing domain. */ [13:54] 183 route_only = addr_family == AF_INET [13:54] 184 ? !nm_ip4_config_best_default_route_get (config) [13:54] 185 : !nm_ip6_config_best_default_route_get (config); [13:54] hmmmm..... [13:54] i smell that your routes might be causing something of above to fail. [13:56] smoser, it smells like NetworkManager knows better and claims it is not the best route.... [13:57] tumbleweed: do you have an idea about https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-bionic/bionic/amd64/s/sphinxcontrib-doxylink/20180314_234233_02148@/log.gz ? [13:59] xnox: added. [14:01] smoser, can you explain your routes to me? e.g. what is this: [14:01] IP4.ROUTE[3]: dst = 169.254.0.0/16, nh = 0.0.0.0, mt = 1000 [14:01] hmm, /dev/urandom on my T480s does 160 MB/s, my X230 had 260. hmm. [14:02] xnox: "crazy" openwrt [14:03] xnox: i'm not sure where that 169 route came from [14:03] 169.254 is ipv4 link local [14:05] smoser, reading network-manager code, instead of asserting that one ticked "only use this interface for resources on this network" it goes into guessing mode "how insane does this route look like" [14:06] xnox: if you're suggesting i clicked some b utton for "only use this interface for resources on this network", then I' have to say that that *could* have happened. i'm quite incompetent with user interfaces. [14:06] although the fact that i have a route to the interwebs *on* that network device would seem contradictory [14:06] ie, i'm using it to type this message to you. [14:07] so if network manager tried to only give me routes to local resources on that device then it failed. [14:08] and looking at network config, i do *not* have a check in 'Use this connection only for resources on its network' [14:12] smoser, yeah, and network-manager->dns->resolved-plugin doesn't seem to check for that checkbox, and instead tries to make an "educated" guess if this is a best route dns server, or not. === tych0- is now known as tych0 [15:09] doko: np [15:34] mdeslaur: fyi, i think php5 might also be affected by (some of) those CVEs ? [15:37] nacc: yes, I'm doing updates for php5 too [15:37] mdeslaur: thanks [16:34] stgraber: Hey, mind looking at my queuebot MP I proposed a few weeks back? [16:35] stgraber: Specifically: https://code.launchpad.net/~tsimonq2/queuebot/add-ubuntu-qt/+merge/33675 [16:35] Er... [16:35] https://code.launchpad.net/~tsimonq2/queuebot/add-ubuntu-qt/+merge/336753 [16:36] lets see if I still know how to use bzr [16:37] stgraber: Or you could just use https://github.com/mnauw/git-remote-bz [16:37] ... [16:37] https://github.com/mnauw/git-remote-bzr [16:37] I never use Bazaar directly these days. ;) [16:51] doko: yes, that was the intent [17:06] dpb1: the source as well? [17:16] doko: I feel like there is another question or concern behind that question? :) [17:18] bigon: Could you add SRU information to bug 1683761? [17:18] bug 1683761 in libnative-platform-java (Ubuntu Artful) "undefined symbol: tgetent" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1683761 [17:19] coreycb: does bug 1755027 need to be private? If so I'll reject the SRU upload. [17:19] Error: Launchpad bug 1755027 could not be found [17:20] bdmurray: it probably should be until all the updates are queued up [17:20] bdmurray: i'll add you to it [17:20] coreycb: Its not about me but SRU bugs need to be public. [17:21] bdmurray: i think we can make it public when the updates are queued up. it's a security vulnerability. [17:21] bdmurray: does that work? [17:22] coreycb: Sure are all these -dashboard packages in artful related to it? [17:23] bdmurray: yes but the vulnerability is in ocata and before. we might as well make it public now. [17:24] i should have updates by eod [17:24] coreycb: okay, feel free to ping me when you want them reviewed. [17:24] bdmurray: ok thanks [17:38] bdmurray: I don't think I still have the package here [17:39] bigon: This is about update the bug report with a test case, regression potential etc. === kees_ is now known as kees [17:44] dpb1: looking at http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.txt, a few binary packages are kept in main. I assume you should talk to the desktop team (libreoffice), if you want to demote tomcat8 altogether [17:54] doko: ah, I see, because of the servlet library [17:54] doko: ok, just the binary packages then [17:54] doko: I did notice some ply related test failures before, because they weren't using dh_python-ply to have tight enough dependencies. Been meaning to look at those [17:54] tomcat8 and tomcat8-admin [17:54] but this one is not that [18:02] dpb1: so still demote these binary package, even if we have to keep the source in main? [20:47] bdmurray: everything's uploaded into the corresponding unapproved queues for 1755027 [20:48] bdmurray: there's a version of horizon in xenial-proposed atm that failed testing and needs to be rejected - 1725421 [20:48] coreycb: if its already in -proposed there isn't really a way to "reject" it. just upload a better one. [20:49] bdmurray: ok then the new version should be able to replace it [20:51] bdmurray: for some reason i can't target some releases in launchpad, for example trove-dashboard doesn't have xenial or artful series available [20:53] coreycb: wow, that's weird. [21:08] coreycb: The API let me add one... [21:09] bdmurray: that's promising [21:09] coreycb: should this have been included in the sahara upload? d/p/fix-neutron-related-openstack_dashboard-imports.patch: [21:11] bdmurray: yes. unfortunately 7.0.0 is the correct version for artful but it was released too late so we have 6.0.0 in artful. [21:12] coreycb: I ask as that patch has no bug reference or anything. [21:13] bdmurray: i understand. i could add one if you want. it hit a build failure running tests and that fixed it. [21:14] coreycb: I think it'd be best. [21:15] bdmurray: ok. i need to step away for a little but will do that and let you know when it's done. [21:59] bdmurray: uploaded a new sahara-dashboard to artful with bug # [22:03] coreycb: Hate to be a pain but it didn't need a new version number since it hasn't been released anywhere yet. [22:03] coreycb: You could just reuse ubuntu1.1 [22:09] bdmurray: ok need a new upload? its just easier that way in our source repo rather than force pushing tags. === blahdeblah_ is now known as blahdeblah [22:12] coreycb: If its extra work for you its fine then [22:17] bdmurray: ok lets go with 1.2. thanks.