[00:26] <infinity> slangasek: IIRC, most of those are ORed deps, but I'll give that a look later tonight after some me time.
[00:27] <slangasek> infinity: well, update_output.txt shows the ones that aren't ORed
[00:28] <infinity> slangasek: Yep.  tunneldigger is, AFAIK, a removal we missed.
[00:29] <infinity>  -- Kai Henningsen <kai@khms.westfalen.de>  Sun,  4 Apr 2004 10:10:24 +0200
[00:29] <infinity> It's been removed from Debian so long that the PTS doesn't even know about it.
[00:29] <infinity> Nor does madison.
[00:29]  * infinity thwacks.
[00:33] <infinity> And, not shockingly, the other two (grml-btnet and grml-shlib) are Ubuntu-specific.
[00:34] <slangasek> infinity: hah, nice
[00:37] <infinity> slangasek: a2mp3 and grml-* are 13yo packages with a dead upstream in debian/copyright.  Kinda tempted to just punt them too.
[00:40] <infinity> But I guess I could just fix the deps and punt that down the road too.  Don't care deeply either way.
[00:40] <infinity> Votes?
[00:40] <slangasek> abstain
[00:41] <jbicha> infinity: please kill ancient unmaintained stuff that no one cares about that isn't in Debian
[00:41] <slangasek> generally: yes.  but in terms of whether that's the right solution for unblocking iproute2: abstain :)
[00:41] <infinity> Well, it *will* unblock it. :)
[00:41] <infinity> So, two birds, one deletion.
[00:42] <jbicha> slangasek: I try not to look too deeply in such cases :)
[00:44]  * infinity looks for other bits from the same era/source.
[00:45] <infinity> Looks like zsh-lovers too.
[00:45] <infinity> So, Ima just thwack that lot.
[00:46] <infinity> And thwacked.
[00:50] <jbicha> infinity: I have lists of packages if you are looking for more stuff to remove :)
[00:52] <infinity> jbicha: I think cleaning this sort of stuff pre-LTS is a good plan.  But I'm also AFK for the next 3 or 4 hours starting now. :P
[00:53] <jbicha> just look through the ubuntu-archive subscribed bugs when you have time
[00:53] <infinity> jbicha: Will do.
[00:54] <tsimonq2> Oh cool, in that case, I might do some analysis (analyses? idk :) ) of KDE 4 junk before Adam comes back.
[00:54] <tsimonq2> Right after I fix Falkon...
[01:11] <tsimonq2> slangasek: falkon> Oh boy, that was a stupid mistake. :P  Fixed.
[01:45] <tsimonq2> infinity: Yo dawg, I heard you're doing removals; bug 1745741 is a kool one.
[01:45] <ubot5`> bug 1745741 in update-manager (Ubuntu Bionic) "RM: removed in Debian, working towards Qt 4 removal goal" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1745741
[01:50] <tsimonq2> Aww what? I thought kdesudo was removed already.
[01:50] <tsimonq2> Ugh.
[01:51] <tsimonq2> Oh, fun, actual porting needed. Cool.
[02:09] <tsimonq2> It seems to me that when someone ported ubuntu-release-upgrader (the GTK frontend) to pkexec, they decided to forget all about the redundant call to kdesudo. Removing the conditional calling kdesudo should Just Fix It, but I'll try my code out in a VM first.
[02:10] <tsimonq2> If this works, bug 1745741 needs to be processed first, then ubuntu-release-upgrader can be uploaded, and after that, we can kill kdesudo with fire.
[02:10] <ubot5`> bug 1745741 in update-manager (Ubuntu Bionic) "RM: removed in Debian, working towards Qt 4 removal goal" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1745741
[03:01] <tsimonq2> Oh, I should probably just get this merged into the Bazaar branch.
[03:01] <tsimonq2> I guess I'll poke again when that's merged...
[03:16] <tsimonq2> Oh, yay. Falkon was accepted.
[03:37] <tsimonq2> slangasek: It seems you never re-reviewed latte-dock after the discussions we had about tangerine.ttf. Could you please do that?
[03:38] <tsimonq2> It would also be good to get a review on ukwm, because there's a couple other UKWM packages which are depwait on that before they can be uploaded.
[03:41] <tsimonq2> Ah, there we go, LP's letting me file the bug... :)  bug 1756492
[03:41] <ubot5`> bug 1756492 in qupzilla (Ubuntu Bionic) "RM: obsoleted by src:falkon" [High,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1756492
[05:40] <slangasek> doko: I don't understand the freebayes build failure; why does ld complain about an "undefined reference to symbol 'gzerror'" in a .so which is already linked against libz?
[06:06] <infinity> slangasek: 'pkg-config --libs libseqlib' seems to be full of lies compared to ldd.
[06:07] <slangasek> infinity: perhaps; but I still don't see why that matters
[06:08] <infinity> slangasek: libseqlib being underlinked is perhaps unrelated (but also broken), but -lz coming on the commandline before -lseqlib will certainly make --as-needed poop.  Which it wouldn't if pkg-config included -lz
[06:09] <slangasek> infinity: except it's not underlinked; objdump -p /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/7/../../../x86_64-linux-gnu/libseqlib.so | grep libz -->   NEEDED               libz.so.1
[06:09] <infinity> slangasek: No, it's underlinked for other deps.  Like I said, unrelated.
[06:09] <slangasek> ah
[06:10] <infinity> Bizarrely, underlinked for almost the exact inverse of what pkg-config --libs says. :P
[06:10] <slangasek> I, er
[06:10] <slangasek> libbwa is only available as a static lib?
[06:10] <infinity> pkg-config knows nothing of -lz and -lm, while pkg-config's list aren't linked (and dpkg-shlibdeps screams loudly)
[06:12] <infinity> bwa and fml both seem to be static only.  But it's also not linked to them.  Or dpkg-shlibdeps is having an aneurysm.
[06:12] <slangasek> yes, it's not linked to them.  all very blech
[06:13] <infinity> Any linker line that starts like 'g++  -fPIC -DPIC -shared -nostdlib' and isn't glibc makes me scared.
[06:20] <slangasek> -fomit-sanity
[08:18] <infinity> slangasek: Hrm, I guess one could assume that the -lfml -lbwa implies that everything that links -lseqlib is meant to bring in the static libs in its own build, in which case, it's not "underlinked" for that purpose.
[08:18] <infinity> slangasek: Then the only bug here (other than piss-poor design, IMO) is '-lz -lm' missing from the pkg-config file.
[08:21] <infinity> slangasek: Make that just -lz, the libm dep is transitive.
[08:23] <infinity> slangasek: Oh, and for the lolz, the pkg-config file is a Debian patch.
[08:33] <infinity> slangasek: And yeah, that fixes freebayes.  Uploaded that seqlib fix, will forward.
[08:38] <slangasek> infinity: heh, ok
[08:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted latte-dock [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.7.3-0ubuntu1]
[08:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: latte-dock [s390x] (bionic-proposed/none) [0.7.3-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[08:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: latte-dock [amd64] (bionic-proposed/none) [0.7.3-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[08:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: latte-dock [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/none) [0.7.3-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[08:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: latte-dock [i386] (bionic-proposed/none) [0.7.3-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[08:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: latte-dock [arm64] (bionic-proposed/none) [0.7.3-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[08:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: latte-dock [armhf] (bionic-proposed/none) [0.7.3-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[09:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted latte-dock [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [0.7.3-0ubuntu1]
[09:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted latte-dock [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [0.7.3-0ubuntu1]
[09:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted latte-dock [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [0.7.3-0ubuntu1]
[09:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted latte-dock [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [0.7.3-0ubuntu1]
[09:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted latte-dock [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [0.7.3-0ubuntu1]
[09:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted latte-dock [i386] (bionic-proposed) [0.7.3-0ubuntu1]
[10:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: sbuild [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [0.74.0-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[10:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted firefox [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [59.0.1+build1-0ubuntu1]
[10:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted firefox [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [59.0.1+build1-0ubuntu1]
[10:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted firefox [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [59.0.1+build1-0ubuntu1]
[10:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted sbuild [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [0.74.0-1ubuntu1]
[10:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted firefox [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [59.0.1+build1-0ubuntu1]
[10:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mailman3 [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.1.1-6]
[10:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted firefox [i386] (bionic-proposed) [59.0.1+build1-0ubuntu1]
[10:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mailman3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/none) [3.1.1-6] (no packageset)
[14:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [s390x] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-13.14] (core, kernel)
[14:28] <ginggs> would someone please 'force-badtest octave-symbolic/2.6.0-3/s390x' ?  it seems to have passed by fluke on this architecture. previous version in vorlon's hints
[15:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-13.14] (core, kernel)
[15:22] <tumbleweed> ginggs: done
[15:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mailman3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [3.1.1-6]
[15:54] <ginggs> tumbleweed: thanks
[16:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-getting-started-docs [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.0-0ubuntu1] (personal-gunnarhj, ubuntu-desktop)
[16:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-13.14] (core, kernel)
[17:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-lts-xenial [amd64] (trusty-proposed) [4.4.0-117.141~14.04.1]
[17:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mailman-suite [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0+20170523-12] (no packageset)
[18:09] <LocutusOfBorg> archive admins, release team
[18:09] <LocutusOfBorg> sbuild is blocked by +         apt-cacher-ng | apt-cacher,
[18:09] <LocutusOfBorg>  not being in main
[18:09] <LocutusOfBorg> but they are part of a new sbuild-debian-developer-setup binary package, why is it in main? I think it can be in universe
[18:09] <LocutusOfBorg> (me is not remembering correctly if this can be done or not, wrt lp systems)
[18:10] <cjwatson> Yes, it's listed on https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.html.  Moving to universe.
[18:18] <tsimonq2> I was gonna say, that's a weird failure...
[18:18] <tsimonq2> Thanks cjwatson
[18:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-13.14] (core, kernel)
[19:25] <tsimonq2> It'd be good to get botan processed fairly quickly.
[19:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: botan (bionic-proposed/primary) [2.4.0-3]
[19:25] <tsimonq2> It was removed in Debian (well, 1.0 was) in 2009ish
[19:25] <tsimonq2> They released a 2.0 and now qtcreator is depwait on it.
[19:26] <tsimonq2> It's just a sync so it's already gone through Debian NEW, etc.
[19:58] <tsimonq2> Cool, so pyqt4 is now a candidate for removal: 1745741
[19:58] <tsimonq2> Er... bug 1745741
[19:58] <ubot5`> bug 1745741 in pykde4 (Ubuntu Bionic) "RM: removed in Debian, working towards Qt 4 removal goal" [Medium,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1745741
[20:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [armhf] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-13.14] (core, kernel)
[22:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted botan [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-3]
[22:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mailman-suite [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [0+20170523-12]
[22:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-getting-started-docs [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.0-0ubuntu1]
[22:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: botan [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-3] (no packageset)
[22:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: botan [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-3] (no packageset)
[22:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: botan [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-3] (no packageset)
[22:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: botan [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-3] (no packageset)
[22:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: botan [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-3] (no packageset)
[22:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: botan [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-3] (no packageset)
[22:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted botan [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-3]
[22:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted botan [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-3]
[22:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted botan [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-3]
[22:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted botan [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-3]
[22:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted botan [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-3]
[22:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted botan [i386] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-3]
[22:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-13.14] (core, kernel)
[22:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-13.14]
[22:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-13.14]
[22:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-13.14]
[22:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-13.14]
[22:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-13.14]
[22:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux [i386] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-13.14]