 @tsimonq2, Do we have any Ubuntu-specific Qt packages?
 @mitya57, Well, we have things which I could sort of consider shared, so like the equivalent of "Qt Extras"
 Sorry, I don't get it. If they are shared, then why introduce a delta and change the maintainer address?
 @mitya57, My point is, if we have a delta (which is possible), it might be useful to point it there.
 But I guess I could refocus my main point to be collection of bugs that doesn't involve joining an LP team. :)
 I don't see much point in doing this. Our delta is small, and we run update-maintainer anyway.
[06:20] <lubot2> Also, the original maintainer field is “Debian/Kubuntu Qt/KDE maintainers” and I think it's great that we have a common team and join our efforts.
 @tsimonq2, We get our bugs on Launchpad anyway, what would change?
 @mitya57, OK, fine by me. :)
 @mitya57, True.
 @mitya57, If I wanted to nitpick though, that should probably be "Debian/Ubuntu Qt/KDE Team" :)
 @tsimonq2, I agree, this can be changed
 @mitya57, Ok
 Can this be backported to bionic? https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-54464
 @alleehol, It sure can.
 I'll do that today.
 Great. thx
 On another Qt-related note, I'll see if I can find an AA to process bug 1745741... We can finally remove pykde4 from Bionic.
 @alleehol, Np :)
[22:30] <tsimonq2> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtcreator/4.5.2-3ubuntu1
 @tsimonq2, Great! Maybe also sync qbs?
 Oh, right. :)
 1.10.1 looks bugfix-only compared to 1.10.0
 https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qbs/1.10.1+dfsg-1
 Thanks :)
 np :)
 https://salsa.debian.org/qt-kde-team/qt/qtdatavisualization
 Since Feature Freeze doesn't apply to NEW packages, my plan is to fix bug 1727617 before Final Beta.
 Same with https://salsa.debian.org/qt-kde-team/qt/qtnetworkauth although I know @acheronuk has packaging and there's some Neon packaging already there so it shouldn't be that hard.