[02:09] <veebers> thumper: I misspoke earlier, it wasn't chamrstore that was failing w/ go 1.10 but a dep of charmstore. The newer revs of the deps build, but the diff for updating charmstore to take into account the updated apis etc. is getting bigger and more guess-work-like :-). My intention is to ask assistance from Roger
[02:11] <thumper> ack
[03:08] <thumper> babbageclunk: got a few minutes?
[03:08] <babbageclunk> thumper: sure - in 1:1?
[03:08] <thumper> ack
[03:16] <thumper> veebers: seems the centos unit tests are broken with the go 1.9 -> 1.10 change
[03:47]  * veebers looks
[04:05] <veebers> thumper: fixed, was old config on the jenkins slave
[04:43] <thumper> coolio
[06:59] <jam> test suite review: https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/8503
[08:50] <wallyworld> jam: here's a PR for that unit provisioner worker bug https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/8504
[09:45] <manadart> jam: Unearthed a bug in my space prior patch for space validation.
[09:45] <manadart> In QA testing I satisfied that one could not set a space in which controller machines had no address(es).
[09:46] <manadart> But it checks machine addresses, which are not decorated with spaces. Only the provider addresses are; at least for current MAAS behaviour.
[09:47] <manadart> So the question is whether we should check all/provider/machine addresses...
[09:48] <manadart> Or should the machine addresses be space-aware?
[09:54] <manadart> jam: NVM. Addresses() merges both.
[10:01] <jam> manadart: was making coffee, will chat with you in 1:1
[19:19] <manadart> Small one for review if anyone is inclined: https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/8506
[20:26] <thumper> balloons: got 5 minutes?
[20:26] <balloons> thumper, sure
[20:26] <balloons> thumper, in our 1:1
[20:26] <thumper> balloons: jump in the 1:1
[20:26] <thumper> ack
[20:27] <balloons> obligatory "great minds think alike; no great minds think for themselves!"
[20:31] <babbageclunk> thumper: looks like you're doing 1:1 with balloons - I guess we basically had ours yesterday anyway?
[20:32] <thumper> babbageclunk: no, I'll be with you shortly
[20:32] <babbageclunk> okeyas
[20:32] <babbageclunk> I don't know what that is