[08:05] <sima> Running Firefox developer edition 6.0.0b5 64bit x86-64,on top of updated 17.10, and when I open an image in a new tab, Cursor does not change to magnifier, when I am over picture. Zooming picture to 1:1 works on click, only, cursor that would suggest zooming does not change when hovering over picture. Might be interesting for next Ubuntu.
[08:23] <lotuspsychje> sima: we reccomend testing daily with packages meant for the ubuntu version
[08:24] <sima> lotuspsychje, ok, thanks.
[14:30] <lavinho> good morning
[14:31] <lavinho> how to put srcolling on on ubuntu 18.04
[14:31] <lavinho> magic mouse 2
[14:51] <donofrio_> what process/package creates and configured the .gpgpg?
[15:11] <ai__> can I install ubuntu on HP Envy x2(snapdragon 835)?
[15:14] <donofrio_> how do I fix this https://pastebin.com/PqZ7mEBR
[15:24] <nacc> donofrio_: your root user shouldn't have a gpg config
[15:24] <nacc> donofrio_: i'm not 100% on that, but it doesn't really make sesne
[15:28] <donofrio_> nacc, when I try on my normal account - https://pastebin.com/FBhR4F6J
[15:47] <nacc> donofrio_: well, that's pretty clear, your user's dirmngr is not what add-apt-repository is trying to connect to
[15:47] <nacc> donofrio_: i've never had a problem with this, so i'm assuming it's your WSL :)
[15:48] <donofrio_> it is, and what should dirmngr point to?
[15:48] <nacc> donofrio_: `which dirmngr` ?
[15:48] <donofrio_> one sec
[15:49] <donofrio_> "/usr/bin/dirmngr"
[16:00] <nacc> donofrio_: you might pass -m to do add-apt-repository
[16:00] <nacc> dunno, i've never had any issue with it
[16:00] <donofrio_> I'll give that a shot...
[16:05] <donofrio_> ;( https://pastebin.com/7sd3wEkU (I appricate your help even if you don't have issues with it alot, I just want to get these repo's working so I can get xfwm4.13 - needed for my notebooks they switched from xrender to opengl
[16:06] <nacc> donofrio_: it seems like xubuntu-dev is alrady in your sources.list; do you just need to add the key? follow th instructions from the pppa page
[16:08] <donofrio_> oh humm....I might have manually added that....I forget....I do bunches of reloads tryin to get this winubuntu working the was I use it ..... yah I think I just need the key but unsure....
[16:08] <nacc> donofrio_: try following the ppa page instructions to just add the key
[16:09] <donofrio_> oh the last six was my attempts at getting this working that is why they are listed
[17:18] <donofrio_> nacc, what did I miss....tried the ignore flag ;( https://pastebin.com/AWSLbxRr
[17:20] <nacc> donofrio_: did you add the key?
[17:25] <swein> threadripper 16core is $869 right now. hard to beat the pricing
[17:36] <donofrio_> nacc, no not yet, last time I didn't have a key (for remmina-next) I thought I used a "switch to force it to continue" but this time it's not working or I'm using the wrong switch?
[17:54] <alnr> where is the settting for system colors?
[18:01] <alnr> my screen is going black in 15 seconds of inactivity. this, after i changed 'blank screen' to never , or 15 minutes, or 5 minutes
[18:02] <nacc> donofrio_: it seems like you should just add the key
[18:02] <nacc> donofrio_: you really don't want to use insecure repositories
[18:04] <donofrio_> I tried this but ;( "donofrio@WSAL0196:~$ sudo apt-key adv -keyserver ppa.launchpad.net --revc-keys EB563F93142986CE Executing: /tmp/apt-key-gpghome.WInJwZDkul/gpg.1.sh -keyserver ppa.launchpad.net --revc-keys EB563F93142986CE gpg: conflicting commands"
[18:04] <donofrio_> why conflicting command?
[18:05] <lotuspsychje> i scrambled /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/50unattended-upgrades somehow.. can anyone pastebin a clean one to me?
[18:06] <nacc> donofrio_: it's --keyserver
[18:07] <lotuspsychje> lotuspsychje@R00TBOOK:~$ LANG=C sudo apt update
[18:07] <lotuspsychje> E: Syntax error /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/50unattended-upgrades:64: Extra junk after value
[18:07] <nacc> lotuspsychje: that line is commented out her, but i believe i have some local modifications
[18:07] <nacc> *here
[18:07] <nacc> one sec
[18:07] <lotuspsychje> nacc: i tried with comment or without, apt spits out the same
[18:08] <nacc> lotuspsychje: this is my .ucf-dist, which i believe is the package version
[18:08] <nacc> (waiting for pastebin)
[18:08] <lotuspsychje> kk
[18:08] <nacc> http://paste.ubuntu.com/p/bcBDhVSHPW/
[18:09] <lotuspsychje> nacc: tnx lemme try
[18:10] <lotuspsychje> same error
[18:11] <lotuspsychje> its like apt doesnt care if file has changed or not hmm
[18:12] <nacc> lotuspsychje: this is my actual file ... http://paste.ubuntu.com/p/rsYyHdb3DN/ which successful apt updated just now
[18:12] <flocculant> mine looks exactly like nacc's - and I have no issues 
[18:12] <lotuspsychje> nacc: is there a way to reload apt somehow?
[18:13] <lotuspsychje> tried comment, uncomment and your clean one
[18:13] <nacc> lotuspsychje: i don't think that should be necessary in general
[18:13] <nacc> lotuspsychje: i'd reboot? :/
[18:13] <nacc> lotuspsychje: i really don't know
[18:13] <lotuspsychje> reboot doesnt fix neither, tested
[18:13] <nacc> lotuspsychje: you could also look at lsof and see if there's something holding the file open
[18:17] <flocculant> what's the :64: about on that anyway?
[18:17] <donofrio_> nacc, back to ipc issue ;( https://pastebin.com/txSz4ZtU
[18:19] <lotuspsychje> flocculant: not sure, tryed to edit flase to true for auto cleanup
[18:19] <lotuspsychje> *false
[18:19] <lotuspsychje> then it went wrong
[18:19] <flocculant> :)
[18:20] <flocculant> lotuspsychje: I assume you've moved the original 50.blah out and copied a new one in and still get the issue?
[18:20] <lotuspsychje> not yet lets try that
[18:20] <flocculant> or of course use the backup one :D
[18:21] <flocculant> donofrio_: is this the same issue you had a while ago? 
[18:21] <donofrio_> yes
[18:22] <donofrio_> just figured I'd work on it for awhile then come back if still having issue, we'll I am....
[18:22] <flocculant> and did you try doing what unit193 said in #xub-dev then?
[18:23] <lotuspsychje> flocculant, nacc deleting the file did the trick
[18:24] <flocculant> lotuspsychje: ok - you got a good one from nacc and that works?
[18:24] <lotuspsychje> have to test after updating
[18:24] <flocculant> good call :p
[18:26] <donofrio_> flocculant, best I could the file is encrypted or something: https://pastebin.com/zz1tw0xt
[18:27] <flocculant> right - no idea what's up - is this that install in windows or whatever you were talking about? or was that someone else lol
[18:28] <donofrio_> flocculant, it was me http://www.tinyurl.com/donofrio1804 is how I get to where I'm at now...
[18:29] <flocculant> so perhaps then it's something to do with that causing your problem
[18:31] <donofrio_> flocculant, if you looked at the process I simply take the most recent ubuntu 18.04 amd64 cloud image convert the squishfs file to a tar file then load it into wsl it boots I patch it up because the file is now a month old, then I add 1466 pakcages though apt-get install xfce4* and ubuntu-desktop packages then pritty much bing I'm here....so how might that process cause this result?
[18:33] <flocculant> no idea - just asking - because you're not usually up front when trying to get help about that ;)
[18:43] <donofrio_> flocculant, yah I'll get more open....mybad for not being in first place....
[18:47] <lotuspsychje> nacc: placed your file now, update works, but autoremove doesnt yet
[19:12] <nacc> lotuspsychje: ok
[22:20] <enyc> Hrrm.......
[22:20] <enyc> This seems needless usability-anonyance in 18.04...
[22:21] <enyc> when presented with exfat USB-stick it just goes "unknown filessystem exfat"
[22:21] <TJ-> Well, I think it's more polite than inserting an ext4 FS on Windows!
[22:22] <enyc> it does not suggest/offer to install "exfat-fuse" "exfat-utils"
[22:22] <enyc> TJ-: aah windows 'disk is not formatted' ??? ;-)
[22:22] <TJ-> what 'it' is reporting/detecting the FS though? is it being massaged through a GUI? is it GVFS?
[22:22] <enyc> TJ-: default ubuntu 18.04 bionic test-image desktop
[22:22] <TJ-> so Gnome?
[22:23] <enyc> must be
[22:23] <TJ-> ahh... not touched it in many years
[22:23] <enyc> I did, however install it on   btrfs  root
[22:23] <enyc> i notice all the other 12.04/14.04/16.04/18.04-on-ext4  in this testing-VM,  DON'T  put the btrfs-18.04  into their grub menu
[22:24] <enyc> but the grub installed by that btrfs-18.04,  does boot all 4 sfstems  [correction: I don't have a 12.04]
[22:24] <TJ-> does GRUB have a btrfs module?
[22:24] <enyc> TJ-: it must have SOME kindo of support as it boots 18.04 off btrfs ok hrrrrrrrrrrrrrm
[22:25] <TJ-> I was being sarcastic, sorry :) We've had brfs in GRUB since 2010 :)
[22:26] <TJ-> But, for those other releases, it's possible the grub-probe code isn't correctly loading its btrfs module
[22:26] <enyc> what "other reasons" ???
[22:28] <TJ-> I've not looked at the grub-probe code for a while but I think it relies on some other tools to ID the file-system. It's possible that hasn't been working correctly for BTRFS, or it may be because of the way you've got the subvolumes configured - I seem to recall there was some mention of it only supporting the / 
[22:28] <enyc> e2fsprogs  provides this  blkid  library for detecting stuff, though grub may be doing its awn thing of course
[22:30] <TJ-> Try "grub-probe -t fs /dev/XXXX" on the BTRFS block device
[22:30] <enyc> bleuuuuuuuuuuuuuurgh my 18.04-gnoe-brtrfs  vb  struuuuuuuuuuuuugling
[22:30] <enyc> not even runnying many apps or atnything
[22:33] <enyc> ok booted the 16.04
[22:35] <enyc> grub-probe: error: failed to get canonical path of `udev'.
[22:35] <enyc> doesn't seem to matter what i probe
[22:37] <TJ-> sorry, my fault sohuld be "grub-probe -t fs -d /dev/XXXX"
[22:38] <TJ-> I always forget the -d for device!
[22:38] <TJ-> otherwise it's a sysfs path
[22:38] <TJ-> counter-intuitive
[22:48] <enyc> detects "btrfs" no problem
[22:48] <enyc> ext4s' detected as "ext2" (which may make sense acutally, same r/o grub driver thing)
[22:53] <enyc> os-prober at fault?
[23:00] <enyc> hrrm even os-prober on the 18.04-on-ext4  is not seeing the 18.04-on-btrfs
[23:08] <TJ-> Could be
[23:10] <TJ-> /usr/lib/os-probes/init/10filesystems  mentions btrfs
[23:18] <enyc> TJ-: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/os-prober/+bug/887836
[23:27] <enyc> grrrrrrrr annoying bug grrrrrrr
[23:29] <TJ-> looks like the patches haven't landed either. bit-rot again! https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688336