=== lotuspsychje_ is now known as lotuspsychje | ||
sima | Running Firefox developer edition 6.0.0b5 64bit x86-64,on top of updated 17.10, and when I open an image in a new tab, Cursor does not change to magnifier, when I am over picture. Zooming picture to 1:1 works on click, only, cursor that would suggest zooming does not change when hovering over picture. Might be interesting for next Ubuntu. | 08:05 |
---|---|---|
lotuspsychje | sima: we reccomend testing daily with packages meant for the ubuntu version | 08:23 |
sima | lotuspsychje, ok, thanks. | 08:24 |
lavinho | good morning | 14:30 |
lavinho | how to put srcolling on on ubuntu 18.04 | 14:31 |
lavinho | magic mouse 2 | 14:31 |
donofrio_ | what process/package creates and configured the .gpgpg? | 14:51 |
ai__ | can I install ubuntu on HP Envy x2(snapdragon 835)? | 15:11 |
donofrio_ | how do I fix this https://pastebin.com/PqZ7mEBR | 15:14 |
nacc | donofrio_: your root user shouldn't have a gpg config | 15:24 |
nacc | donofrio_: i'm not 100% on that, but it doesn't really make sesne | 15:24 |
donofrio_ | nacc, when I try on my normal account - https://pastebin.com/FBhR4F6J | 15:28 |
nacc | donofrio_: well, that's pretty clear, your user's dirmngr is not what add-apt-repository is trying to connect to | 15:47 |
nacc | donofrio_: i've never had a problem with this, so i'm assuming it's your WSL :) | 15:47 |
donofrio_ | it is, and what should dirmngr point to? | 15:48 |
nacc | donofrio_: `which dirmngr` ? | 15:48 |
donofrio_ | one sec | 15:48 |
donofrio_ | "/usr/bin/dirmngr" | 15:49 |
nacc | donofrio_: you might pass -m to do add-apt-repository | 16:00 |
nacc | dunno, i've never had any issue with it | 16:00 |
donofrio_ | I'll give that a shot... | 16:00 |
donofrio_ | ;( https://pastebin.com/7sd3wEkU (I appricate your help even if you don't have issues with it alot, I just want to get these repo's working so I can get xfwm4.13 - needed for my notebooks they switched from xrender to opengl | 16:05 |
nacc | donofrio_: it seems like xubuntu-dev is alrady in your sources.list; do you just need to add the key? follow th instructions from the pppa page | 16:06 |
donofrio_ | oh humm....I might have manually added that....I forget....I do bunches of reloads tryin to get this winubuntu working the was I use it ..... yah I think I just need the key but unsure.... | 16:08 |
nacc | donofrio_: try following the ppa page instructions to just add the key | 16:08 |
donofrio_ | oh the last six was my attempts at getting this working that is why they are listed | 16:09 |
donofrio_ | nacc, what did I miss....tried the ignore flag ;( https://pastebin.com/AWSLbxRr | 17:18 |
nacc | donofrio_: did you add the key? | 17:20 |
swein | threadripper 16core is $869 right now. hard to beat the pricing | 17:25 |
donofrio_ | nacc, no not yet, last time I didn't have a key (for remmina-next) I thought I used a "switch to force it to continue" but this time it's not working or I'm using the wrong switch? | 17:36 |
alnr | where is the settting for system colors? | 17:54 |
alnr | my screen is going black in 15 seconds of inactivity. this, after i changed 'blank screen' to never , or 15 minutes, or 5 minutes | 18:01 |
nacc | donofrio_: it seems like you should just add the key | 18:02 |
nacc | donofrio_: you really don't want to use insecure repositories | 18:02 |
donofrio_ | I tried this but ;( "donofrio@WSAL0196:~$ sudo apt-key adv -keyserver ppa.launchpad.net --revc-keys EB563F93142986CE Executing: /tmp/apt-key-gpghome.WInJwZDkul/gpg.1.sh -keyserver ppa.launchpad.net --revc-keys EB563F93142986CE gpg: conflicting commands" | 18:04 |
donofrio_ | why conflicting command? | 18:04 |
lotuspsychje | i scrambled /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/50unattended-upgrades somehow.. can anyone pastebin a clean one to me? | 18:05 |
nacc | donofrio_: it's --keyserver | 18:06 |
lotuspsychje | lotuspsychje@R00TBOOK:~$ LANG=C sudo apt update | 18:07 |
lotuspsychje | E: Syntax error /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/50unattended-upgrades:64: Extra junk after value | 18:07 |
nacc | lotuspsychje: that line is commented out her, but i believe i have some local modifications | 18:07 |
nacc | *here | 18:07 |
nacc | one sec | 18:07 |
lotuspsychje | nacc: i tried with comment or without, apt spits out the same | 18:07 |
nacc | lotuspsychje: this is my .ucf-dist, which i believe is the package version | 18:08 |
nacc | (waiting for pastebin) | 18:08 |
lotuspsychje | kk | 18:08 |
nacc | http://paste.ubuntu.com/p/bcBDhVSHPW/ | 18:08 |
lotuspsychje | nacc: tnx lemme try | 18:09 |
lotuspsychje | same error | 18:10 |
lotuspsychje | its like apt doesnt care if file has changed or not hmm | 18:11 |
nacc | lotuspsychje: this is my actual file ... http://paste.ubuntu.com/p/rsYyHdb3DN/ which successful apt updated just now | 18:12 |
flocculant | mine looks exactly like nacc's - and I have no issues | 18:12 |
lotuspsychje | nacc: is there a way to reload apt somehow? | 18:12 |
lotuspsychje | tried comment, uncomment and your clean one | 18:13 |
nacc | lotuspsychje: i don't think that should be necessary in general | 18:13 |
nacc | lotuspsychje: i'd reboot? :/ | 18:13 |
nacc | lotuspsychje: i really don't know | 18:13 |
lotuspsychje | reboot doesnt fix neither, tested | 18:13 |
nacc | lotuspsychje: you could also look at lsof and see if there's something holding the file open | 18:13 |
flocculant | what's the :64: about on that anyway? | 18:17 |
donofrio_ | nacc, back to ipc issue ;( https://pastebin.com/txSz4ZtU | 18:17 |
lotuspsychje | flocculant: not sure, tryed to edit flase to true for auto cleanup | 18:19 |
lotuspsychje | *false | 18:19 |
lotuspsychje | then it went wrong | 18:19 |
flocculant | :) | 18:19 |
flocculant | lotuspsychje: I assume you've moved the original 50.blah out and copied a new one in and still get the issue? | 18:20 |
lotuspsychje | not yet lets try that | 18:20 |
flocculant | or of course use the backup one :D | 18:20 |
flocculant | donofrio_: is this the same issue you had a while ago? | 18:21 |
donofrio_ | yes | 18:21 |
donofrio_ | just figured I'd work on it for awhile then come back if still having issue, we'll I am.... | 18:22 |
flocculant | and did you try doing what unit193 said in #xub-dev then? | 18:22 |
lotuspsychje | flocculant, nacc deleting the file did the trick | 18:23 |
flocculant | lotuspsychje: ok - you got a good one from nacc and that works? | 18:24 |
lotuspsychje | have to test after updating | 18:24 |
flocculant | good call :p | 18:24 |
donofrio_ | flocculant, best I could the file is encrypted or something: https://pastebin.com/zz1tw0xt | 18:26 |
flocculant | right - no idea what's up - is this that install in windows or whatever you were talking about? or was that someone else lol | 18:27 |
donofrio_ | flocculant, it was me http://www.tinyurl.com/donofrio1804 is how I get to where I'm at now... | 18:28 |
flocculant | so perhaps then it's something to do with that causing your problem | 18:29 |
donofrio_ | flocculant, if you looked at the process I simply take the most recent ubuntu 18.04 amd64 cloud image convert the squishfs file to a tar file then load it into wsl it boots I patch it up because the file is now a month old, then I add 1466 pakcages though apt-get install xfce4* and ubuntu-desktop packages then pritty much bing I'm here....so how might that process cause this result? | 18:31 |
flocculant | no idea - just asking - because you're not usually up front when trying to get help about that ;) | 18:33 |
donofrio_ | flocculant, yah I'll get more open....mybad for not being in first place.... | 18:43 |
lotuspsychje | nacc: placed your file now, update works, but autoremove doesnt yet | 18:47 |
nacc | lotuspsychje: ok | 19:12 |
=== Elimin8r is now known as Elimin8er | ||
enyc | Hrrm....... | 22:20 |
enyc | This seems needless usability-anonyance in 18.04... | 22:20 |
enyc | when presented with exfat USB-stick it just goes "unknown filessystem exfat" | 22:21 |
TJ- | Well, I think it's more polite than inserting an ext4 FS on Windows! | 22:21 |
enyc | it does not suggest/offer to install "exfat-fuse" "exfat-utils" | 22:22 |
enyc | TJ-: aah windows 'disk is not formatted' ??? ;-) | 22:22 |
TJ- | what 'it' is reporting/detecting the FS though? is it being massaged through a GUI? is it GVFS? | 22:22 |
enyc | TJ-: default ubuntu 18.04 bionic test-image desktop | 22:22 |
TJ- | so Gnome? | 22:22 |
enyc | must be | 22:23 |
TJ- | ahh... not touched it in many years | 22:23 |
enyc | I did, however install it on btrfs root | 22:23 |
enyc | i notice all the other 12.04/14.04/16.04/18.04-on-ext4 in this testing-VM, DON'T put the btrfs-18.04 into their grub menu | 22:23 |
enyc | but the grub installed by that btrfs-18.04, does boot all 4 sfstems [correction: I don't have a 12.04] | 22:24 |
TJ- | does GRUB have a btrfs module? | 22:24 |
enyc | TJ-: it must have SOME kindo of support as it boots 18.04 off btrfs ok hrrrrrrrrrrrrrm | 22:24 |
TJ- | I was being sarcastic, sorry :) We've had brfs in GRUB since 2010 :) | 22:25 |
TJ- | But, for those other releases, it's possible the grub-probe code isn't correctly loading its btrfs module | 22:26 |
enyc | what "other reasons" ??? | 22:26 |
TJ- | I've not looked at the grub-probe code for a while but I think it relies on some other tools to ID the file-system. It's possible that hasn't been working correctly for BTRFS, or it may be because of the way you've got the subvolumes configured - I seem to recall there was some mention of it only supporting the / | 22:28 |
enyc | e2fsprogs provides this blkid library for detecting stuff, though grub may be doing its awn thing of course | 22:28 |
TJ- | Try "grub-probe -t fs /dev/XXXX" on the BTRFS block device | 22:30 |
enyc | bleuuuuuuuuuuuuuurgh my 18.04-gnoe-brtrfs vb struuuuuuuuuuuuugling | 22:30 |
enyc | not even runnying many apps or atnything | 22:30 |
enyc | ok booted the 16.04 | 22:33 |
enyc | grub-probe: error: failed to get canonical path of `udev'. | 22:35 |
enyc | doesn't seem to matter what i probe | 22:35 |
TJ- | sorry, my fault sohuld be "grub-probe -t fs -d /dev/XXXX" | 22:37 |
TJ- | I always forget the -d for device! | 22:38 |
TJ- | otherwise it's a sysfs path | 22:38 |
TJ- | counter-intuitive | 22:38 |
enyc | detects "btrfs" no problem | 22:48 |
enyc | ext4s' detected as "ext2" (which may make sense acutally, same r/o grub driver thing) | 22:48 |
=== siel_ is now known as siel | ||
enyc | os-prober at fault? | 22:53 |
enyc | hrrm even os-prober on the 18.04-on-ext4 is not seeing the 18.04-on-btrfs | 23:00 |
TJ- | Could be | 23:08 |
TJ- | /usr/lib/os-probes/init/10filesystems mentions btrfs | 23:10 |
enyc | TJ-: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/os-prober/+bug/887836 | 23:18 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 887836 in os-prober (Ubuntu) "update-grub does not create btrfs menuentry in grub.cfg" [High,Triaged] | 23:18 |
enyc | grrrrrrrr annoying bug grrrrrrr | 23:27 |
TJ- | looks like the patches haven't landed either. bit-rot again! https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688336 | 23:29 |
ubottu | Debian bug 688336 in os-prober "update-grub finds only one system on btrfs volume" [Normal,Open] | 23:29 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!