* RAOF grumbles at yet another autopkgtest that now fails on s390x because machine-isolation has been enabled. | 00:48 | |
xnox | muahahahahhaha | 00:48 |
---|---|---|
xnox | RAOF, stop denying the truth! you envy big iron =) | 00:48 |
RAOF | xnox: Look, Canonical is absolutely welcome to buy me a Talos II workstation and I will care all the things about power8. | 00:49 |
RAOF | xnox: But you're not going to get me excited about big iron :P | 00:50 |
RAOF | (Or perhaps I'd be caring about Power9, which maybe shows you how much I currently follow that :gri | 00:51 |
RAOF | đ¸ | 00:51 |
infinity | RAOF: IBM keeps promising me x86-competitive build-your-own POWER options. When that actually happens, my next home server will be P9, I imagine. | 01:12 |
infinity | Well, that also depends on it not requiring the rotor from an Apache helicopter to keep it cool. | 01:12 |
RAOF | Heh. | 01:13 |
RAOF | Well, the Talos II has been in âPre-orders accepted!â state for⌠maybe a year now? | 01:13 |
infinity | I have faith. | 01:13 |
infinity | Ish. | 01:13 |
RAOF | âWhen that actually happensâ is an excellent qualifier :) | 01:13 |
infinity | The original plan was to sell bad yield CPUs with disabled cores at cut rate prices. | 01:14 |
infinity | But two things happened: their yields improved, and demand for P8 was significantly higher than they expected. | 01:14 |
infinity | So, good news for IBM, bad news for enthusiasts. | 01:14 |
RAOF | Eh. I'll just end up with 16+ cores of Ryzen in my next system. | 01:17 |
RAOF | That'll do. | 01:17 |
infinity | RAOF: Oh yes, I'm quite happy with all things Ryzen. | 01:17 |
infinity | RAOF: But I still want POWER just cause. | 01:18 |
infinity | RAOF: I may be old, but there's still a giddy hobbyist nerd hiding in here somewhere. | 01:18 |
RAOF | Heh. | 01:18 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: ukui-window-switch (bionic-proposed/primary) [1.1.1-0ubuntu1] | 05:09 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cross-toolchain-base-ports [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [19ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop) | 05:38 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: plymouth (artful-proposed/main) [0.9.2-3ubuntu17 => 0.9.2-3ubuntu18] (core) | 06:35 | |
tsimonq2 | FTR: bug 1757320. | 06:41 |
ubot5` | bug 1757320 in youker-assistant (Ubuntu) "Remove Qt 4 from the archive" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1757320 | 06:41 |
tsimonq2 | I'll allow time for the dust to settle (people who are subscribed to the packages to react to it, confirm/deny it) but I plan on sending an email to ubuntu-release this week. | 06:42 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: golang-github-coreos-bbolt (bionic-proposed/primary) [1.3.1-coreos.5-1] | 06:53 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cross-toolchain-base-ports [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [19ubuntu2] | 07:35 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted deepin-terminal [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.9.2-1] | 07:35 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mongodb [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [1:3.4.7-1ubuntu3] | 07:35 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mongodb [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [1:3.4.7-1ubuntu3] | 07:35 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted deepin-screenshot [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.0.11-1] | 07:35 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mongodb [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [1:3.4.7-1ubuntu3] | 07:35 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-coreos-bbolt [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.3.1-coreos.5-1] | 07:35 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntukylin-wallpapers [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [18.04.0] | 07:35 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: deepin-screenshot [s390x] (bionic-proposed/none) [4.0.11-1] (no packageset) | 07:37 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-coreos-bbolt [amd64] (bionic-proposed/none) [1.3.1-coreos.5-1] (no packageset) | 07:37 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: deepin-screenshot [amd64] (bionic-proposed/none) [4.0.11-1] (no packageset) | 07:39 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: deepin-screenshot [i386] (bionic-proposed/none) [4.0.11-1] (no packageset) | 07:39 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: deepin-screenshot [arm64] (bionic-proposed/none) [4.0.11-1] (no packageset) | 07:40 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: deepin-screenshot [armhf] (bionic-proposed/none) [4.0.11-1] (no packageset) | 07:41 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: deepin-terminal [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/none) [2.9.2-1] (no packageset) | 07:42 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: deepin-terminal [amd64] (bionic-proposed/none) [2.9.2-1] (no packageset) | 07:43 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: deepin-terminal [s390x] (bionic-proposed/none) [2.9.2-1] (no packageset) | 07:43 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: deepin-terminal [i386] (bionic-proposed/none) [2.9.2-1] (no packageset) | 07:46 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: deepin-terminal [arm64] (bionic-proposed/none) [2.9.2-1] (no packageset) | 07:54 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: deepin-terminal [armhf] (bionic-proposed/none) [2.9.2-1] (no packageset) | 07:55 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted deepin-screenshot [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.0.11-1] | 08:26 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted deepin-screenshot [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [4.0.11-1] | 08:26 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted deepin-screenshot [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [4.0.11-1] | 08:26 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted deepin-terminal [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [2.9.2-1] | 08:26 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted deepin-terminal [i386] (bionic-proposed) [2.9.2-1] | 08:26 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted deepin-terminal [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [2.9.2-1] | 08:26 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted deepin-screenshot [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [4.0.11-1] | 08:26 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted deepin-terminal [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [2.9.2-1] | 08:26 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted deepin-terminal [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [2.9.2-1] | 08:26 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted deepin-screenshot [i386] (bionic-proposed) [4.0.11-1] | 08:26 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-coreos-bbolt [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [1.3.1-coreos.5-1] | 08:26 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted deepin-terminal [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [2.9.2-1] | 08:26 | |
LocutusOfBorg | hello guys, appport regressed in release (probably this is an ifra regression, not a release one?)... can autopkgtests be ignored? | 08:38 |
LocutusOfBorg | apport-valgrind creates a user specified sandbox and cache ... WARNING: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 is needed, but cannot be mapped to a package | 08:40 |
LocutusOfBorg | ERROR: Cannot find package which ships ExecutablePath /bin/true | 08:40 |
LocutusOfBorg | this is a strange error TBH | 08:40 |
mwhudson | LocutusOfBorg: i remember unhelpfully slangasek saying something about that but no other details | 08:47 |
mwhudson | oh wait no there's not been a new glibc recently :) | 08:48 |
LocutusOfBorg | does anybody know where I can push changes I did to src:casper package? I fail to see how https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/casper/trunk can point to the right code | 09:06 |
acheronuk | LocutusOfBorg: I asked in here the other day where the current VCS was, as was told the VCS 'was the archive' | 09:14 |
LocutusOfBorg | nice! | 09:16 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dovecot (artful-proposed/main) [1:2.2.27-3ubuntu1.3 => 1:2.2.27-3ubuntu1.4] (ubuntu-server) | 11:10 | |
sil2100 | rbasak: hey! Would you mind if I take a look at the systemd SRU in xenial and artful - releasing it if it's all good? | 11:25 |
sil2100 | rbasak: didn't want to get in the way | 11:25 |
rbasak | sil2100: sure, thanks | 11:45 |
jbicha | please remove sambamba from bionic-proposed. 0.6.7-1 fails to build on i386 and we can just rebuild 0.6.6-1 instead to finish the ldc transition | 12:39 |
jbicha | LocutusOfBorg: unless you were working on fixing 0.6.7? | 12:40 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted avahi [source] (trusty-proposed) [0.6.31-4ubuntu1.2] | 13:21 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted avahi [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.6.32~rc+dfsg-1ubuntu2.1] | 13:22 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted avahi [source] (artful-proposed) [0.6.32-1ubuntu1.1] | 13:25 | |
LocutusOfBorg | jbicha, https://github.com/biod/sambamba/issues/344 | 13:27 |
LocutusOfBorg | BTW, I would prefer to remove it on i386, or demote to proposed for some hours | 13:27 |
jbicha | demote what to proposed? | 13:27 |
LocutusOfBorg | I already disabled the assert in my ppa and the build went successfully, but since upstream is working on it, better wait | 13:27 |
LocutusOfBorg | sambamba | 13:27 |
LocutusOfBorg | btw tilix is sad because of apport regression in release | 13:28 |
jbicha | we could just wait a few days on sambamba/ldc transition then since upstream might have a fix soon | 13:29 |
LocutusOfBorg | but since the version is regressed in release (only in i386), I could even disable the assert and upload | 13:34 |
LocutusOfBorg | and then sync when the new version 0.6.8 is out | 13:34 |
LocutusOfBorg | uploaded, i386 makes little sense nowadays | 13:36 |
LocutusOfBorg | and the fix will come in a matter of hours (BTW this is segfaulting since years on i386 and nobody complained lol) | 13:36 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected pulseaudio [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:8.0-0ubuntu3.9] | 13:50 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected libnative-platform-java [source] (artful-proposed) [0.11-5ubuntu1] | 13:54 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted akregator [source] (artful-proposed) [4:17.04.3-0ubuntu1.1] | 14:02 | |
LocutusOfBorg | apw, please ignore apport autopkgtests? so we can see ldc migrate? | 14:11 |
juliank | Laney, slangasek python-apt based autopkgtests currently fail on armhf because it sets APT::Default-Release somewhere in apt.conf[.d]. While we should eventually fix the tests, I don't know how many are affected (only update-manager and ubuntu-release-upgrader I know about). Can we get this changed so it does not set APT::Default-Release, but pins bionic to 990 using a preferences file? | 14:21 |
juliank | Then we can get ubuntu-release-upgrader migrate to release pocket again :) | 14:23 |
slangasek | LocutusOfBorg: I don't see any way that apport's tests regressing would be an infrastructure change; please check with bdmurray | 14:54 |
slangasek | juliank: I don't see any references to Default-Release in our cloud setup. Does this come from lxd defaults? | 14:56 |
juliank | slangasek: I have no idea, but it seems to be set only on armfh | 14:56 |
slangasek | juliank: armhf is the only arch where our runners are in containers | 14:58 |
juliank | It's certainly not in my autopkgtest-build-lxd container | 15:00 |
juliank | but that's all I know, the rest is a mystery to me :) | 15:00 |
LocutusOfBorg | slangasek, but ignoring, is it a possibility? we will see some stuff migrate, and this is a "regreesed in release" situation | 15:01 |
juliank | Last time tests worked fine on armhf was 2018-03-18 12:57:05 UTC | 15:02 |
juliank | that is about two days ago | 15:02 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted plymouth [source] (artful-proposed) [0.9.2-3ubuntu18] | 15:02 | |
juliank | um, 3 days ago | 15:02 |
juliank | (well, with the old ubuntu-release-upgrader) | 15:03 |
slangasek | LocutusOfBorg: true, that is my rule, if it's regressed in release it should not be allowed to block. Can I ask you to file a bug against the apport package about it, and I'll add the hint? | 15:13 |
LocutusOfBorg | sure! | 15:16 |
Laney | When we find out why this broke, we should see if we can make proposed-migration not miss the regression next time | 15:17 |
slangasek | quite | 15:17 |
Laney | slangasek: can you see if you can make the autopkgtest@lxd unit go away on autopkgtest-cloud-worker/3 please? :( | 15:21 |
Laney | I'm too incompetent to know how to do that | 15:22 |
slangasek | looking | 15:22 |
Laney | it's causing an error message to be mailed to me by the maintenance job | 15:22 |
slangasek | haha | 15:22 |
slangasek | if only other people could receive these mails | 15:22 |
Laney | that | 15:22 |
LocutusOfBorg | interesting, I'm finding the regression in some glibc stuff | 15:22 |
LocutusOfBorg | will update the bug | 15:22 |
slangasek | Laney: it only went away when I ran sudo rm /etc/systemd/system/autopkgtest-lxd-socat@.service && sudo systemctl daemon-reload (and maybe the first part of that command was not relevant) | 15:28 |
LocutusOfBorg | ok I'm pretty sure lxc regressed it | 15:28 |
slangasek | Laney: but also that leaves autopkgtest-lxd-socat@lxd-armhf-10.44.41.136.service behind as 'not-found' and I don't know why :P | 15:28 |
LocutusOfBorg | slangasek, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/+bug/1757470 | 15:31 |
ubot5` | Ubuntu bug 1757470 in lxc (Ubuntu) "apport autopkgtests broken (valgrind error) LXC regression?" [Undecided,New] | 15:31 |
Laney | slangasek: autopkgtest-cloud/tools/cleanup-lxd produces empty output now, so I'm happy, thanks | 15:32 |
slangasek | ok | 15:32 |
slangasek | Laney: I'm unhappy that I still have a dangling unit, but if the scripts are clean, I won't fret overmuch ;) | 15:33 |
LocutusOfBorg | lxc migrated the exact day the test started failing, other differences are gcc-8 minor update and something similar, but lxc seems my best bet | 15:34 |
LocutusOfBorg | lets see the stuff migrate <3 | 15:35 |
slangasek | LocutusOfBorg: lxc in bionic? that isn't used on the infrastructure | 15:40 |
LocutusOfBorg | slangasek, I did a diff on artifacts.tar.gz | 16:09 |
LocutusOfBorg | why is it shown there then? | 16:12 |
slangasek | LocutusOfBorg: it's part of the base image. But the lxc version *in* the runner image is not part of the "infrastructure" of the runners, and I don't see anything in the apport package that implies it uses lxc | 16:14 |
LocutusOfBorg | oh got it | 16:17 |
LocutusOfBorg | sooooo, other differences are really not helping | 16:18 |
slangasek | sure, but please reassign the bug to the apport package | 16:18 |
slangasek | because that's where "ownership" of the issue needs to lie | 16:18 |
LocutusOfBorg | sure | 16:20 |
LocutusOfBorg | I see some seeds changed, can them be a problem? e.g. ubuntu-minimal and some ubuntu-* packages | 16:20 |
LocutusOfBorg | maybe they were indirectly needed | 16:20 |
LocutusOfBorg | is looking at both testbed-packages the right thing to do? | 16:23 |
LocutusOfBorg | or upstream-system-packages is the best place? | 16:24 |
slangasek | could be any of the above | 16:24 |
LocutusOfBorg | I'll let somebody else understand the problem, I'm really not much involved in such package | 16:31 |
slangasek | I'm working through the ruby re-promotions | 16:44 |
slangasek | (so hopefully nobody collides with me and causes package deletions :P) | 16:45 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected grub2 [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.18] | 16:48 | |
nacc | slangasek: thank you (re: ruby) | 16:56 |
slangasek | nacc: promotions done | 17:11 |
nacc | slangasek: great; dpb1 --^ | 17:14 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.18] | 17:38 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (xenial-proposed/main) [2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.18 => 2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.18] (core) | 18:03 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libgepub [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.6.0-1] (ubuntugnome) | 18:10 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: retro-gtk [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.14.0-1] (no packageset) | 18:10 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: retro-gtk [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.14.0-1] (no packageset) | 18:10 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libgepub [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.6.0-1] (ubuntugnome) | 18:10 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: retro-gtk [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.14.0-1] (no packageset) | 18:11 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-terminal [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.0-1ubuntu1] (desktop-core) | 18:11 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-terminal [s390x] (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.0-1ubuntu1] (desktop-core) | 18:11 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libgepub [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.6.0-1] (ubuntugnome) | 18:12 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: retro-gtk [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.14.0-1] (no packageset) | 18:12 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-terminal [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.0-1ubuntu1] (desktop-core) | 18:14 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: retro-gtk [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.14.0-1] (no packageset) | 18:15 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libgepub [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.6.0-1] (ubuntugnome) | 18:16 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libgepub [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.6.0-1] (ubuntugnome) | 18:16 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-terminal [armhf] (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.0-1ubuntu1] (desktop-core) | 18:17 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-terminal [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.0-1ubuntu1] (desktop-core) | 18:18 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: retro-gtk [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.14.0-1] (no packageset) | 18:19 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-terminal [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.0-1ubuntu1] (desktop-core) | 18:21 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libgepub [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.6.0-1] (ubuntugnome) | 18:21 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: hdparm (artful-proposed/main) [9.51+ds-1 => 9.51+ds-1ubuntu0.1] (core) | 18:25 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: hdparm (xenial-proposed/main) [9.48+ds-1 => 9.48+ds-1ubuntu0.1] (core) | 18:26 | |
=== daniel is now known as Guest77671 | ||
=== Guest77671 is now known as Odd_Bloke | ||
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (xenial-proposed/main) [2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.18 => 2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.18] (core) | 18:33 | |
coreycb | hello, can an archive admin please remove heat-api-cloudwatch binary package as well as the source package python-django-openstack-auth and its corresponding binaries? note that horizon now provides the python-django-openstack-auth binary. | 18:36 |
slangasek | coreycb: heat-api-cloudwatch will get reaped after the new version of heat currently in -proposed migrates, and not before; you appear to have some autopkgtest regressions that you need to sort out http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#heat | 19:13 |
coreycb | slangasek: i have a new upload that sorts them out. forgot to drop heat-api-cloudwatch tests on the prior upload. | 19:14 |
slangasek | coreycb: python-django-openstack-auth , I would like a bug report filed against the package please (and please ping with the bug # when you have it) | 19:15 |
coreycb | slangasek: got it :) https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-django-openstack-auth/+bug/1757141 | 19:16 |
ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1757141 in python-django-openstack-auth (Ubuntu) "[RM] Package needs to be removed in Bionic" [Undecided,New] | 19:16 |
slangasek | ok :) | 19:16 |
coreycb | slangasek: thanks | 19:16 |
slangasek | that one is actually tricky because removing python-django-openstack-auth from bionic will immediately make horizon uninstallable | 19:16 |
slangasek | I think I'll force horizon first | 19:16 |
Trevinho | sil2100: hey, when you've a sec can you please check this SRU https://bileto.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/3190 ? | 19:18 |
coreycb | slangasek: we want to keep the horizon binary. i'm probably missing something with how you do it on your end. | 19:18 |
ahasenack | hi, sssd has a component mismatch (http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#sssd), the MIR was approved: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/http-parser/+bug/1638957 | 19:20 |
ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1638957 in http-parser (Ubuntu) "[MIR] http-parser, dependency of sssd" [High,Fix committed] | 19:20 |
slangasek | coreycb: so, if I act on the removal request for python-django-openstack-auth, python-django-horizon immediately becomes uninstallable in bionic release, and then *hopefully*, becomes installable again with the next proposed-migration run. Instead, I'm using a hint to force horizon to migrate, which will make only python-openstack-auth uninstallable, which we don't care about; and then I'll | 19:20 |
ahasenack | could someone please take a look at that? | 19:20 |
slangasek | remove python-django-openstack-auth when the dust settles | 19:20 |
slangasek | coreycb: more explanation than you care about, but hopefully satisfies you that I'm not accidentally nuking any horizon binaries | 19:20 |
slangasek | ahasenack: doing | 19:21 |
slangasek | ahasenack: done | 19:21 |
ahasenack | thanks a lot | 19:21 |
coreycb | slangasek: alright, thanks for the explanation! | 19:23 |
sil2100 | Trevinho: hey! I'll check it tomorrow for sure, since that's the usual day when I do SRU work | 19:40 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.18] | 20:14 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [arm64] (xenial-proposed) [2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.18] | 20:14 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-7-cross-ports [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [14ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) | 20:20 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-7-cross-ports [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [14ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) | 20:35 | |
sergiusens | slangasek: any idea about this "E:The value 'bionic' is invalid for APT::Default-Release as such a release is not available in the sources". Getting it on and autopkgtest for armhf on bionic raised by apt_pkg on https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-bionic/bionic/armhf/s/snapcraft/20180321_183314_f654f@/log.gz | 21:23 |
sergiusens | also, really glad to see that the timeouts seem to be resolved! | 21:23 |
sergiusens | the same thing, tested from an upstream PR (base of the debsource) worked fine https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-bionic-snappy-dev-snapcraft-daily/bionic/armhf/s/snapcraft/20180321_171551_4b0bb@/log.gz | 21:30 |
slangasek | sergiusens: this sounds like the same issue juliank raised earlier; but I don't know where that Default-Release setting comes from | 21:48 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lshw (artful-proposed/main) [02.18-0.1ubuntu4 => 02.18-0.1ubuntu4.1] (core) | 21:54 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lshw (xenial-proposed/main) [02.17-1.1ubuntu3.4 => 02.17-1.1ubuntu3.5] (core) | 21:55 | |
juliank | slangasek: can you do the magic to enter the autopkgtest after a test failure? | 22:01 |
slangasek | juliank: yeah, just have to swap in the context. Do you have a quick-to-fail one that you want me to try? | 22:02 |
juliank | slangasek: update-manager is about ~7min | 22:04 |
sergiusens | slangasek: this is not consistent as almost all our tests instrument this logic so more should have failed | 22:59 |
slangasek | # cat /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/autopkgtest-default-release | 23:14 |
slangasek | APT::Default-Release "bionic"; | 23:14 |
slangasek | seems to be present since July 2017 in upstream autopkgtest git, so must be a side effect of a config change | 23:16 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-terminal [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.0-1ubuntu1] | 23:36 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-terminal [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.0-1ubuntu1] | 23:36 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-terminal [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.0-1ubuntu1] | 23:36 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-terminal [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.0-1ubuntu1] | 23:36 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-terminal [i386] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.0-1ubuntu1] | 23:36 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-terminal [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.0-1ubuntu1] | 23:37 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libgepub [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [0.6.0-1] | 23:37 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libgepub [i386] (bionic-proposed) [0.6.0-1] | 23:37 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libgepub [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [0.6.0-1] | 23:37 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libgepub [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [0.6.0-1] | 23:37 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libgepub [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [0.6.0-1] | 23:37 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libgepub [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [0.6.0-1] | 23:37 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted retro-gtk [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [0.14.0-1] | 23:38 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted retro-gtk [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [0.14.0-1] | 23:38 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted retro-gtk [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [0.14.0-1] | 23:38 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted retro-gtk [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [0.14.0-1] | 23:38 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted retro-gtk [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [0.14.0-1] | 23:38 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted retro-gtk [i386] (bionic-proposed) [0.14.0-1] | 23:38 | |
slangasek | juliank: ok - this is an old commit but only recently merged upstream, and not merged into the tree on the kvm master. | 23:43 |
slangasek | juliank: so it came in as part of the redeploy of the lxd infra. I'll sort out a revert | 23:43 |
slangasek | Laney: ^^ we are currently pointing directly at the autoimported upstream autopkgtest repo, which has now broken us. I'm going to work through pointing instead at https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-release/autopkgtest/+git/development | 23:46 |
sergiusens | slangasek: so do I also wait for your signal to retrigger? | 23:50 |
slangasek | sergiusens: or you can tell me what to retrigger once fixed | 23:52 |
sergiusens | slangasek: 2.40+18.04 snapcraft/2.40+18.04 | 23:54 |
sergiusens | http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/s/snapcraft/bionic/armhf | 23:54 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!