[00:31] wgrant: When using lp.bugs.createBug, what should I set as a target for an Ubuntu source package? [00:32] (Examples of using lp.bugs.createBug would be good too.) [00:32] tsimonq2: lp.distributions['ubuntu'].getSourcePackage(name='foo') [00:32] createBug is fairly simple IIRC? Just the usual parameters [00:33] Right so e.g. lp.bugs.createBug(target=package, tags="qt4-removal") right? [00:37] * tsimonq2 tries on staging [00:42] tsimonq2: Plus title and description, yeah. [00:43] tsimonq2: Tags may want a list instead of a space-separated string, despite what the docs say (they're reused from the web UI)... I forget. [00:47] wgrant: OK [00:48] wgrant: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/VPdqdVWZ5k/ [00:48] Hm. [00:48] I'm doing this from a VPS. [00:48] I'd use Python 2 [00:49] OK [00:55] wgrant: ftr a string ended up being fine: https://bugs.staging.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vc/+bug/175637 [00:55] Error: ubuntu bug 175637 not found [00:55] er [00:55] https://bugs.staging.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vc/+bug/1756377 [00:55] Error: Could not gather data from Ubuntu for bug #1756377 (https://launchpad.net/bugs/1756377). The error has been logged [00:56] Nice. [00:57] wgrant: How do I do newlines when /n doesn't work? [00:58] (in the desc) [01:04] Ohh [01:04] Figured it out [01:04] Totally PEBKAC :P [01:52] Would this be the right place to ask why a PPA is failing to install a package when building? The package seems to be available in the repositories https://launchpadlibrarian.net/361565049/buildlog_ubuntu-artful-i386.mythtv_2%3A30.0~master.20180322.7f37ca7-0ubuntu0mythbuntu2_BUILDING.txt.gz [02:08] wgrant: All better I think: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs?field.tag=qt4-removal [04:35] tgm4883: i see libcec4-dev but not libcec-dev [06:41] Hello everyone [06:41] I have a little question [06:42] Does launchpad provide ppas for every program that's in it or is it up to the developers ? [06:47] ChamScales: What do you mean? [06:47] When you create a PPA, it's empty. [06:47] It's then up to you to put stuff in there. [06:48] I'm asking because I can't find the ppa for xpad : https://launchpad.net/xpad [06:48] Then there's no PPA. :) [06:49] ok, I was just wondering if the website itself was autimatically creating them [06:49] thsnks for the info [06:51] But xpad is in Ubuntu, so unless you absolutely need the latest version you don't really need a PPA. === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun [06:59] wgrant : I need the latest version [06:59] anywho, thanks for your help [06:59] gotta go now === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk [09:39] tsimonq2: The crash you ran into in https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/VPdqdVWZ5k/ is fixed in the latest version of launchpadlib, FWIW. [09:40] cjwatson: I'm running Bionic... [09:40] Hmm. [09:47] Not up-to-date. [09:47] That's definitely not python3-launchpadlib 1.10.6-1. [10:02] Ohh. [10:02] No, you're right, that was on an artful install... [10:23] would anybody be able to tell me why, despite being a member of the group owning https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-it-ask which is the owner of https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-it-ask-devel I'm not able to perform any admin functions on the latter? [10:25] I just so happen to also be a direct non-admin member of https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-it-ask-devel - but I expected to gain admin powers through the owner [10:26] Owners aren't admins. [10:26] Or in general, owners aren't (necessarily) members. [10:27] right, that's the case of those teams as well [10:27] So owning ~ubuntu-it-ask doesn't confer the ability to do things that members of that team can do. [10:27] This is intentional: it allows for instance ~techboard to own a bunch of extremely powerful teams without themselves being able to ordinarily exercise that power. [10:28] but shouldn't I, as an indirect owner of ~ubuntu-it-ask-devel, be able to at the very least to member management of that team? [10:28] But you're not: you'd have to be an actual member of ~ubuntu-it-ask to be an indirect owner of ~ubuntu-it-ask-devel. [10:28] No. Ownership just allows you to take control of the team; it doesn't mean you participate in it. [10:28] (Or rather, just an owner.) [10:29] oh, so I could add myself as a member of ~ubuntu-it-ask (through being a direct member of the team owning ~ubuntu-it-ask), and then I'd be a direct owner of ~ubuntu-it-ask-devel as well and therefore gaining admin privs? [10:30] To be clear, you would only gain admin privs that way because ~ubuntu-it-ask is explicitly an admin of ~ubuntu-it-ask-devel. [10:30] Not just the owner. [10:30] But yes. [10:31] and if the membership of ~ubuntu-it-ask in ~ubuntu-it-ask-devel were to be deactivated, so it would only be an owner, would that still work? [10:38] I thought the answer was no, but I'm afraid I forget the fine details. [10:42] guess I could play with this in the staging server… [10:42] It feels more roundabout that what I'd like it to be :) [10:44] mhhh, I can't log in to https://staging.launchpad.net - https://login-lp.staging.ubuntu.com ? [10:44] You need an account on the staging SSO system. [10:44] Use qastaging.launchpad.net [10:44] That uses the production SSO system. [10:45] FWIW, I like the separation of owners and admins. For me, it works as I'd expect. [10:45] oh right. keep forgetting that staging.lp.o doesn't share the accounts [10:45] pity that qastaging is currently down === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun [14:43] nacc: Isn't this it here https://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=libcec-dev&searchon=names&suite=all§ion=all [14:46] that error indicates that the package is present but uninstallable [14:46] best way to investigate that is usually to set up a chdist environment (from devscripts) with sources.list matching the set of sources you're trying to use in this build, and drill down until apt gives you a useful error message [14:48] cjwatson: ok, i'll keep digging into it. Thanks for looking [14:52] libcec-dev : Depends: libcec4 (= 4.0.1+dfsg1-1) but 4.0.2.1~artful is to be installed [14:52] tgm4883: ^- somewhat closer to the actual error [14:54] tgm4883: which is because you're using https://launchpad.net/~team-xbmc/+archive/ubuntu/xbmc-ppa-build-depends, and that includes a libcec source package which has a newer version of libcec4 but only has libcec4-dev not libcec-dev [14:54] libcec4-dev from that PPA is installable [14:55] ah [14:55] I had completely forgotten about PPA dependencies [14:56] cjwatson: rebuilding now, thanks for digging into that. You're a lot faster at it than I would have been [15:00] We get questions of this form every so often, so I'm in the habit :) === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk