lubot2 | <tsimonq2> wgrant advised me to file separate bugs instead of one big bug (which makes sense, in hindsight...) https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs?field.tag=qt4-removal | 02:24 |
---|---|---|
lubot2 | <tsimonq2> I'll send an email to ubuntu-release shortly. | 02:25 |
lubot2 | <Lazy B> Never heard anything about 5.11 being the last dot release. This link here tells something different http://blog.qt.io/blog/2018/02/22/qt-roadmap-2018/ | 06:08 |
lubot2 | <tsimonq2> Oh? | 06:08 |
lubot2 | <tsimonq2> Maybe I misunderstood what "planning for Qt 6 after 5.11" meant. | 06:08 |
lubot2 | <tsimonq2> (In fact, I probably did.) | 06:09 |
lubot2 | <tsimonq2> Sorry. | 06:09 |
lubot2 | <Lazy B> I think we have at least 3 years before Qt6 will appear in some shape | 06:10 |
lubot2 | <tsimonq2> I also said that in #kubuntu-devel, not here. :P | 06:10 |
lubot2 | <tsimonq2> But yeah, | 06:10 |
lubot2 | <tsimonq2> Makes sense. | 06:10 |
lubot2 | <mitya57> @tsimonq2, It would be nice to follow Debian and remove qtwebkit-source before the rest of Qt (because it is a very vulnerable piece of software). | 06:27 |
lubot2 | <tsimonq2> @mitya57, See above, there's a separate removal bug for that now. :) | 06:28 |
lubot2 | <mitya57> Ok :) | 06:28 |
lubot2 | <tsimonq2> Many thanks to slangasek who just removed a good chunk of obsolete Plasma widgets that were Qt 4 :) | 06:29 |
lubot2 | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs?field.searchtext=&orderby=-importance&field.status%3Alist=FIXRELEASED&assignee_option=any&field.assignee=&field.bug_reporter=&field.bug_commenter=&field.subscriber=&field.structural_subscriber=&field.component-empty-marker=1&field.tag=qt4-removal&field.tags_combinator=ANY&field.status_upstream-empty-marker=1&field.has_cve.used=&field.omit_dupes.used=&field.omit_dupes=on&field.affects_me.used=&field.has_no_package.u | 06:29 |
lubot2 | sed=&field.has_patch.used=&field.has_branches.used=&field.has_branches=on&field.has_no_branches.used=&field.has_no_branches=on&field.has_blueprints.used=&field.has_blueprints=on&field.has_no_blueprints.used=&field.has_no_blueprints=on&search=Search | 06:29 |
lubot2 | <tsimonq2> @mitya57 Here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtwebkit-source/+bug/1757846 | 06:30 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 1757846 in qtwebkit-source (Ubuntu) "Please port your package away from Qt 4" [Undecided,New] | 06:30 |
lubot2 | <mitya57> Too bad that we don't have bug dependencies | 06:31 |
lubot2 | <tsimonq2> You can merge bugs, I guess. | 06:31 |
lubot2 | <tsimonq2> (mark one bug as affecting a few other affected patches and mark the bugs filed against those patches as duplicates of the original) | 06:32 |
lubot2 | <tsimonq2> s/patches/packages/g | 06:32 |
lubot2 | <mitya57> Nah, I would better leave these as separate bugs and add links to Debian BTS for packages I'm interested in. | 06:33 |
lubot2 | <tsimonq2> Alright | 06:34 |
lubot2 | <tsimonq2> I might as well go through and add links to the BTS for all of these | 06:34 |
lubot2 | <mitya57> There is a list of Debian bugs at https://wiki.debian.org/Qt4Removal | 06:35 |
lubot2 | <tsimonq2> Right, I linked that wiki page in all the bug descriptions in Ubuntu :) | 06:36 |
lubot2 | <mitya57> Oh :) | 06:36 |
lubot2 | <acheronuk> why is qtvirtualkeyboaud not built with languages? (CONFIG += lang-all) | 17:47 |
lubot2 | <acheronuk> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1758099 | 17:47 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 1758099 in plasma-workspace (Ubuntu) "sddm virtual keyboard's langage can't be changed" [Undecided,New] | 17:47 |
lubot2 | <mitya57> Why is it not the default build configuration? | 17:51 |
lisandro | is it because the build expects all languages available at build time? | 17:54 |
lisandro | I've read something alongside that in a kde ml | 17:54 |
lisandro | if someone can confirm it *maybe* we can trick hunspell/myspell maintainers to provide a metapackage | 17:55 |
lisandro | https://doc.qt.io/qt-5.10/qtvirtualkeyboard-build.html might shed some light | 17:57 |
lisandro | we might need to pass lang-all | 17:59 |
* lisandro tries | 17:59 | |
acheronuk | would be nice if its that simple! | 18:01 |
lisandro | it owuld | 18:01 |
lisandro | but I think it needs all those packages | 18:01 |
acheronuk | opensuse and arch build requires are just hunspell, so the actual input lang support may be internal? | 18:02 |
lisandro | does opensuse and arch ship each lang in a separate package? | 18:02 |
lisandro | the current build dependnecies need hunspell-en-gb | 18:03 |
lisandro | mitya57: by the way I am currently needing to add testing to sources.list in order to fullfil qt's needs on gtk | 18:06 |
lisandro | I do realy hope it's a bug somewhere else | 18:06 |
mitya57 | Qt does not need gtk, only qt5-gtk-platformtheme depends on it but it is an optional package | 18:07 |
lisandro | if I get to re do a chroot for tetting I'll show you | 18:07 |
lisandro | *testing | 18:07 |
acheronuk | arch seem to split hunspell | 18:09 |
lisandro | do the use CONFIG+=all-langs ? | 18:10 |
lisandro | er, lang-all | 18:10 |
mitya57 | yes: https://git.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/tree/trunk/PKGBUILD?h=packages/qt5-virtualkeyboard#n27 | 18:11 |
mitya57 | also handwriting, that may be useful for us too | 18:11 |
acheronuk | lisandro: https://git.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/tree/trunk/PKGBUILD?h=packages/qt5-virtualkeyboard | 18:12 |
lisandro | except we can't use handwriting | 18:13 |
acheronuk | # Only enable languages that don't force-include bundled 3rdparty libs | 18:16 |
acheronuk | %qmake5 "CONFIG+=lang-ar_AR lang-da_DK lang-de_DE lang-en_GB lang-es_ES lang-fa_FA lang-fi_FI lang-fr_FR lang-hi_IN lang-it_IT lang-nb_NO lang-pl_PL lang-pt_PT lang-ro_RO lang-ru_RU lang-sv_SE" | 18:16 |
acheronuk | that is opensuse ^^ | 18:16 |
lisandro | let's try lang-all then | 18:17 |
lisandro | oh, not possible | 18:19 |
lisandro | I see what opensuse does | 18:19 |
lisandro | we are removing tcime and pinyin | 18:19 |
lisandro | from 3rdparty | 18:20 |
lisandro | but I think we better use a patch for that | 18:21 |
lubot2 | <mitya57> Just for more statistics, Fedora also uses lang-all: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/qt5-qtvirtualkeyboard/blob/master/f/qt5-qtvirtualkeyboard.spec#_52 | 18:22 |
lisandro | but also builds the 3rdparty tcime and pinyin which e do not ship due to dfsg | 18:25 |
lisandro | *we do not | 18:25 |
acheronuk | lisandro: 'we' as in debian AND ubuntu? | 18:26 |
lisandro | yes, we both adhere to them | 18:26 |
lisandro | well, at least I think you also have that part removed | 18:26 |
lisandro | but feel free to check :-) | 18:26 |
acheronuk | must do, as my test build just crashed and burned on those :P | 18:28 |
lisandro | :-) | 18:28 |
lisandro | yup, will have a patch soon | 18:31 |
acheronuk | thanks :) | 18:32 |
lisandro | my pleasure! always good if we can improve stuff! | 18:32 |
lisandro | I might enable handwriting support too | 18:40 |
lisandro | acheronuk: patch already in salsa.d.o | 18:41 |
lisandro | + rules changes | 18:41 |
acheronuk | great | 18:53 |
lisandro | I might add arrow-key-navigation | 18:53 |
acheronuk | :D | 18:54 |
lisandro | acheronuk: everything on salsa.d.o now | 19:03 |
acheronuk | applying to 5.9.4 | 19:21 |
acheronuk | and fails to build. test errors | 19:28 |
lisandro | yes, they are flacky | 19:29 |
lisandro | if you check debian/rules you will see that we are ignoring the errors | 19:29 |
lisandro | not the best thing to do, but.... | 19:29 |
lisandro | also you need all the locales for all langs for the tests to pass | 19:29 |
acheronuk | ignoring with what? | 19:31 |
acheronuk | I see you ignoring on arm64? | 19:32 |
acheronuk | ah. I see what you did. just being blind | 20:05 |
acheronuk | lisandro: https://i.imgur.com/MxRbHkv.png | 20:12 |
lisandro | Excellent!! | 21:24 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!