/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2018/03/23/#ubuntu-release.txt

-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: docker.io (xenial-proposed/universe) [17.03.2-0ubuntu1~16.04.1 => 17.03.2-0ubuntu3~16.04.1] (no packageset)03:05
tsimonq2slangasek: Finished my last round of initial triaging of the Qt 4 bugs; https://is.gd/pRDB9o should be good now for a while.04:00
slangasekdoko: ocrmypdf> your 5.5-2ubuntu1 didn't show much in the way of test failures because tesseract-ocr and ghostscript were missing from the build-dependencies... I added them and now I see what you mean (and regretted having done so).  Do you think it's better that I upload this package with this horrible testsuite that leaves dozens of tesseract processes spinning and eating CPU, or just leave04:04
slangasekit as-is?04:04
slangasektsimonq2: will someone update the kubuntu seeds to drop ksaneplugin from 'supported'?04:22
tsimonq2slangasek: I don't have access myself, but yes.04:34
tsimonq2slangasek: processing> Many thanks.04:40
* slangasek nods04:42
slangaseknow I move on to debugging node-mapnik autopkgtest failures, and am reminded that the quoting rules for debian/tests/control are both undocumented and terrible04:42
* tsimonq2 doesn't want to have my name on nodejs anymore, make it go awaaaaaaaaaaay04:50
tsimonq2:)04:50
tsimonq2I mean, I'll follow through with this one, but... :/04:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: choqok [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.6-1.isreally.1.6-2.1] (no packageset)05:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: choqok [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.6-1.isreally.1.6-2.1] (no packageset)05:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: choqok [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.6-1.isreally.1.6-2.1] (no packageset)05:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: choqok [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.6-1.isreally.1.6-2.1] (no packageset)05:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted choqok [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [1.6-1.isreally.1.6-2.1]05:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted choqok [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [1.6-1.isreally.1.6-2.1]05:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted choqok [i386] (bionic-proposed) [1.6-1.isreally.1.6-2.1]05:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted choqok [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [1.6-1.isreally.1.6-2.1]05:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: choqok [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.6-1.isreally.1.6-2.1] (no packageset)05:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: choqok [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.6-1.isreally.1.6-2.1] (no packageset)05:19
tsimonq2slangasek: Can you please RM src:gcompris? Scott K just removed from Debian, Debian bug 89346405:19
ubot5Debian bug 893464 in ftp.debian.org "RM: gcompris -- RoQA; dead upstream, replaced by src:gcompris-qt" [Normal,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/89346405:19
tsimonq2slangasek: (For future ref, does following Debian on package removals even when the package has a delta need a bug?)05:22
slangasektsimonq2: generally no bug needed, as long as I can figure out that the package isn't being maintained in Ubuntu05:39
tsimonq2slangasek: OK cool.05:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted choqok [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [1.6-1.isreally.1.6-2.1]05:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mir [s390x] (bionic-proposed/main) [0.31.0.1-0ubuntu1] (desktop-core)05:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted choqok [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [1.6-1.isreally.1.6-2.1]05:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted virtualbox-hwe [source] (bionic-proposed) [5.2.8-dfsg-5ubuntu18.04.1]05:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mir [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [0.31.0.1-0ubuntu1] (desktop-core)05:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mir [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [0.31.0.1-0ubuntu1] (desktop-core)06:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mir [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [0.31.0.1-0ubuntu1] (desktop-core)06:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: puma [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.6.0-1ubuntu3] (no packageset)06:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: puma [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.6.0-1ubuntu3] (no packageset)06:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: puma [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.6.0-1ubuntu3] (no packageset)06:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: puma [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.6.0-1ubuntu3] (no packageset)06:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted puma [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [3.6.0-1ubuntu3]06:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted puma [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [3.6.0-1ubuntu3]06:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: puma [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.6.0-1ubuntu3] (no packageset)06:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted puma [i386] (bionic-proposed) [3.6.0-1ubuntu3]06:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted puma [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [3.6.0-1ubuntu3]06:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: puma [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.6.0-1ubuntu3] (no packageset)06:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted puma [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [3.6.0-1ubuntu3]06:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted puma [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [3.6.0-1ubuntu3]06:25
slangasektsimonq2: on the nodejs front, is node-tape anything that's on your radar? Debian bug #89333706:27
ubot5Debian bug 893337 in node-tape "node-tape: autopkgtest broken in new version" [Normal,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/89333706:27
tsimonq2slangasek: Ah, I hadn't seen that; thanks.06:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: virtualbox-hwe [i386] (bionic-proposed/multiverse) [5.2.8-dfsg-5ubuntu18.04.1] (no packageset)06:29
tsimonq2slangasek: Is that already badtested?06:29
slangasektsimonq2: it is not.06:29
tsimonq2slangasek: Do you plan on badtesting it?06:29
slangasekthe version in -proposed has regressed the tess06:29
tsimonq2Ah.06:29
slangasekno06:29
tsimonq2Gotcha.06:29
slangasek(I plan on removing it from -proposed, if no one cares about it)06:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mir [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [0.31.0.1-0ubuntu1] (desktop-core)06:31
tsimonq2My vote is do it .06:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mir [armhf] (bionic-proposed/main) [0.31.0.1-0ubuntu1] (desktop-core)06:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: virtualbox-hwe [amd64] (bionic-proposed/multiverse) [5.2.8-dfsg-5ubuntu18.04.1] (no packageset)06:37
slangasektsimonq2: done.06:37
tsimonq2slangasek: cool06:38
tsimonq2slangasek: Can I please get "force-badtest node-class-utils/0.3.5-1" added to hints? It's regressed in release: http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/n/node-class-utils06:59
tsimonq2Thanks.07:04
tsimonq2General note: sbuild should migrate now with this new upload.07:27
acheronukslangasek: ksaneplugin removed from Kubuntu supported07:34
slangasekacheronuk: cheers07:34
=== ochosi_ is now known as ochosi
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pyxs [source] (artful-proposed) [0.4.1+dfsg1-0ubuntu1~17.10.0]09:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pyxs [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.4.1+dfsg1-0ubuntu1~16.04.0]09:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pyxs [amd64] (artful-proposed/none) [0.4.1+dfsg1-0ubuntu1~17.10.0] (no packageset)09:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pyxs [amd64] (xenial-proposed/none) [0.4.1+dfsg1-0ubuntu1~16.04.0] (no packageset)09:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pyxs [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.4.1+dfsg1-0ubuntu1~17.10.0]09:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pyxs [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [0.4.1+dfsg1-0ubuntu1~16.04.0]09:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rax-nova-agent [source] (artful-proposed) [2.1.12-0ubuntu2~17.10.0]10:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rax-nova-agent [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.1.12-0ubuntu2~16.04.0]10:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rax-nova-agent [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.1.12-0ubuntu2~17.10.0] (no packageset)10:46
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rax-nova-agent [amd64] (xenial-proposed/universe) [2.1.12-0ubuntu2~16.04.0] (no packageset)10:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rax-nova-agent [amd64] (artful-proposed) [2.1.12-0ubuntu2~17.10.0]11:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rax-nova-agent [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [2.1.12-0ubuntu2~16.04.0]11:00
cjwatsonslangasek: I guess I should technically ask for a feature freeze exception for versioned Provides support in germinate?  Though I've just deployed it on nusakan and I'm not sure changing it in the distro is risky by comparison :)11:23
sil2100cjwatson: I guess it would be good to have that documented with an FFe ;)11:25
cjwatsonsil2100: repurposing https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/germinate/+bug/1758004 for that then11:26
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1758004 in Ubuntu on IBM z Systems "[Ubuntu 18.04] Error installing the "Basic Ubuntu Server"" [High,Triaged]11:26
cjwatsonI've diffed full germinate output before and after that change and confirmed that every resulting difference is correct11:26
cjwatson(basically python{,3}-cffi-backend, some e2fsprogs transitional library packages dropping out, and some espeak packages dropping out because espeak-ng is now sufficient)11:27
cjwatson(the last doesn't affect images, only extra output)11:28
sil2100cjwatson: I approved the FFe o/ Thanks!11:36
sil2100(oh well formallities)11:37
cjwatsonthank you11:38
LocutusOfBorgjamespage, hello, can you please do a python-msgpack/msgpack-python switch and merge from debian?14:53
LocutusOfBorgI can do it, but I have no way of testing the work14:54
LocutusOfBorgsee https://packages.qa.debian.org/p/python-msgpack/news/20180323T133924Z.html14:54
LocutusOfBorgand https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=89384414:54
ubot5Debian bug 893844 in borgbackup "borgbackup: upgrade of python3-msgpack creates version conflict" [Serious,Open]14:54
LocutusOfBorgjamespage, something like that https://launchpad.net/~costamagnagianfranco/+archive/ubuntu/locutusofborg-ppa/+sourcepub/8875622/+listing-archive-extra15:00
LocutusOfBorgeven if renaming the package makes my brain segfault for upgrade path15:00
jamespageLocutusOfBorg: yes but won't be today...15:01
LocutusOfBorgI can do it, I'm already testing the upgrade path15:03
LocutusOfBorgthat packaging should provide msgpack and python-msgpack so we should be safe15:04
LocutusOfBorgbut in case, I would like to do a no-change rebuild of reverse-deps to be safe15:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-wallpapers [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [18.04.0-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)15:31
=== jbicha_ is now known as jbicha
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapcraft (xenial-proposed/universe) [2.39.3+really2.35 => 2.40] (no packageset)15:58
sergiusenstjaalton: mind accepting ^15:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: python-msgpack (bionic-proposed/primary) [0.5.4-0ubuntu2]16:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xdg-user-dirs (xenial-proposed/main) [0.15-2ubuntu6 => 0.15-2ubuntu6.16.04.1] (core)16:40
tjaaltonsergiusens: where's artful?16:46
sergiusenstjaalton: coming soon16:47
tjaaltonhow soon :)16:47
tjaaltonI'm practically EOW16:48
sergiusens10'16:53
sergiusenstjaalton: done17:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapcraft (artful-proposed/universe) [2.35+17.10 => 2.40+17.10] (no packageset)17:04
sergiusensslangasek: mind accepting snapcraft into -proposed please? I think I might have missed Timo and his EOW warning17:48
=== alan_g is now known as alan_g|EOW
slangaseksergiusens: sure, I will look at it18:11
sergiusensthank you very much18:16
slangaseksergiusens: you're wanting to land this in -proposed before the current one is released to -updates?18:17
sergiusensslangasek: if that is artful, yes, please pop 2.35+17.10  out of circulation; it will not even work on artful18:19
slangasekok18:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapcraft [source] (artful-proposed) [2.40+17.10]18:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: python-certbot-dns-cloudflare (bionic-proposed/primary) [0.22.0-1]19:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: neutron (artful-proposed/main) [2:11.0.3-0ubuntu1 => 2:11.0.3-0ubuntu1.1] (openstack, ubuntu-server)19:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: python-certbot-dns-dnsimple (bionic-proposed/primary) [0.22.0-1]19:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: python-certbot-dns-digitalocean (bionic-proposed/primary) [0.22.0-1]19:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: python-certbot-dns-google (bionic-proposed/primary) [0.22.0-1]19:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: python-certbot-dns-rfc2136 (bionic-proposed/primary) [0.22.0-1]19:02
tjaaltonslangasek: re nss-pem; the pkg I uploaded merges src:nss source in it, but maybe it would be best to do the other way round instead (nss-pem is <100k unpacked), though that might end up being a permanent diff to debian since I doubt mike would accept that either..19:05
tjaalton"talk to upstream.." (which finally rejected it some years ago)19:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapcraft [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.40]19:21
slangasektjaalton: hey, so, I was surprised when you said that was how you were handling nss-pem; I think duplicating the source of such a security-sensitive codebase as nss is not a great option19:23
slangasektjaalton: I understand that you can't use the existing nss package because the libraries/headers are not made public by the Debian maintainer19:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: neutron (xenial-proposed/main) [2:8.4.0-0ubuntu7.1 => 2:8.4.0-0ubuntu7.2] (openstack, ubuntu-server)19:24
slangasektjaalton: but I don't understand why we're considering that decision by the Debian maintainer binding for what Ubuntu does.  Why do we not take a decision to support these as public interfaces, regardless of what Debian has decided, and carry a delta?19:24
slangasekit's not like we're creating our own shared libraries here... upstream is already shipping shared libraries, they just aren't shipped in /usr/lib19:25
tjaaltonslangasek: well nss-pem needs static libs, of non-public interfaces that haven't changed in many years19:44
tjaaltonsure we can carry a delta, if that's ok. but would that be packaging the headers/static libs on a separate package as proposed?19:45
tjaaltonfeel free to drop current nss-pem and I'll create a proper one, and can upload nss too with the new pkg19:47
tjaaltonslangasek: put something in bug #1751140 so that it's not lost :)19:51
ubot5bug 1751140 in nss (Ubuntu) "nss-pem needs additional headers, static libs to build" [Undecided,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/175114019:51
slangasektjaalton: oh, these are interfaces that are currently not exposed at all in any of the shared objects, including those in /usr/lib/nss?19:53
tjaaltonnot all no20:00
tjaaltonnssb can't be shared or there would be a circular dep20:04
slangasekok20:08
slangaseklet me ponder a bit more then20:08
tjaaltoni might have more in emails from the redhat folks, need to check later..20:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lttng-modules [source] (artful-proposed) [2.9.0-1ubuntu3.2]20:25
tjaaltonslangasek: there's one thing though that might help with the decision; redhat is actively replacing nss with openssl, but certmonger hasn't been ported yet but it will be, at some point20:26
tjaaltonso, could be the path of least effort is to provide only freeipa-client in the archive, and I'll put the rest in a ppa20:27
slangasektjaalton: well, if you choose to withdraw this from the archive, that certainly spares me from having to make any decision, true ;)20:27
tjaaltonjust need to advise folks doing upgrades to enable the ppa20:28
slangasekI don't think there's any obligation that you do this20:29
slangasekI hate to encourage use of ppas20:29
tjaaltonwell, for freeipa-server users..20:29
slangasekand would rather figure out the right way to accept nss-pem20:29
tjaaltonsure20:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron [source] (artful-proposed) [2:11.0.3-0ubuntu1.1]20:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron [source] (xenial-proposed) [2:8.4.0-0ubuntu7.2]20:57
LocutusOfBorg[18:33:42] <LocutusOfBorg> please accept python-msgpack, it follows the same renaming that Debian did21:11
LocutusOfBorg[18:33:49] <LocutusOfBorg> msgpack-python -> python-msgpack21:11
LocutusOfBorg[18:33:54] <LocutusOfBorg> there aren't new binaries21:11
tsimonq2infinity: Did you have any luck figuring out the critical Lubuntu install bug?23:29
tsimonq2infinity: If not, might you have notes so I can take a look?23:29
slangasektsimonq2: pointer to this?23:33
tsimonq2sec23:34
tsimonq2slangasek: bug 175417423:36
ubot5bug 1754174 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "[Lubuntu] "Install Lubuntu" fails with several commands not found and permission denied" [Critical,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/175417423:36
slangasekah that one's still around?23:36
tsimonq2I guess so23:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-defaults-ports [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.175ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)23:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-defaults-ports [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.175ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)23:41

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!