-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: docker.io (xenial-proposed/universe) [17.03.2-0ubuntu1~16.04.1 => 17.03.2-0ubuntu3~16.04.1] (no packageset) | 03:05 | |
tsimonq2 | slangasek: Finished my last round of initial triaging of the Qt 4 bugs; https://is.gd/pRDB9o should be good now for a while. | 04:00 |
---|---|---|
slangasek | doko: ocrmypdf> your 5.5-2ubuntu1 didn't show much in the way of test failures because tesseract-ocr and ghostscript were missing from the build-dependencies... I added them and now I see what you mean (and regretted having done so). Do you think it's better that I upload this package with this horrible testsuite that leaves dozens of tesseract processes spinning and eating CPU, or just leave | 04:04 |
slangasek | it as-is? | 04:04 |
slangasek | tsimonq2: will someone update the kubuntu seeds to drop ksaneplugin from 'supported'? | 04:22 |
tsimonq2 | slangasek: I don't have access myself, but yes. | 04:34 |
tsimonq2 | slangasek: processing> Many thanks. | 04:40 |
* slangasek nods | 04:42 | |
slangasek | now I move on to debugging node-mapnik autopkgtest failures, and am reminded that the quoting rules for debian/tests/control are both undocumented and terrible | 04:42 |
* tsimonq2 doesn't want to have my name on nodejs anymore, make it go awaaaaaaaaaaay | 04:50 | |
tsimonq2 | :) | 04:50 |
tsimonq2 | I mean, I'll follow through with this one, but... :/ | 04:50 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: choqok [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.6-1.isreally.1.6-2.1] (no packageset) | 05:12 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: choqok [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.6-1.isreally.1.6-2.1] (no packageset) | 05:13 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: choqok [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.6-1.isreally.1.6-2.1] (no packageset) | 05:14 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: choqok [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.6-1.isreally.1.6-2.1] (no packageset) | 05:15 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted choqok [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [1.6-1.isreally.1.6-2.1] | 05:18 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted choqok [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [1.6-1.isreally.1.6-2.1] | 05:18 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted choqok [i386] (bionic-proposed) [1.6-1.isreally.1.6-2.1] | 05:18 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted choqok [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [1.6-1.isreally.1.6-2.1] | 05:18 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: choqok [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.6-1.isreally.1.6-2.1] (no packageset) | 05:19 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: choqok [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.6-1.isreally.1.6-2.1] (no packageset) | 05:19 | |
tsimonq2 | slangasek: Can you please RM src:gcompris? Scott K just removed from Debian, Debian bug 893464 | 05:19 |
ubot5 | Debian bug 893464 in ftp.debian.org "RM: gcompris -- RoQA; dead upstream, replaced by src:gcompris-qt" [Normal,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/893464 | 05:19 |
tsimonq2 | slangasek: (For future ref, does following Debian on package removals even when the package has a delta need a bug?) | 05:22 |
slangasek | tsimonq2: generally no bug needed, as long as I can figure out that the package isn't being maintained in Ubuntu | 05:39 |
tsimonq2 | slangasek: OK cool. | 05:39 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted choqok [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [1.6-1.isreally.1.6-2.1] | 05:47 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mir [s390x] (bionic-proposed/main) [0.31.0.1-0ubuntu1] (desktop-core) | 05:47 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted choqok [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [1.6-1.isreally.1.6-2.1] | 05:47 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted virtualbox-hwe [source] (bionic-proposed) [5.2.8-dfsg-5ubuntu18.04.1] | 05:51 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mir [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [0.31.0.1-0ubuntu1] (desktop-core) | 05:56 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mir [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [0.31.0.1-0ubuntu1] (desktop-core) | 06:01 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mir [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [0.31.0.1-0ubuntu1] (desktop-core) | 06:06 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: puma [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.6.0-1ubuntu3] (no packageset) | 06:11 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: puma [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.6.0-1ubuntu3] (no packageset) | 06:12 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: puma [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.6.0-1ubuntu3] (no packageset) | 06:12 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: puma [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.6.0-1ubuntu3] (no packageset) | 06:13 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted puma [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [3.6.0-1ubuntu3] | 06:14 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted puma [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [3.6.0-1ubuntu3] | 06:14 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: puma [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.6.0-1ubuntu3] (no packageset) | 06:14 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted puma [i386] (bionic-proposed) [3.6.0-1ubuntu3] | 06:14 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted puma [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [3.6.0-1ubuntu3] | 06:14 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: puma [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.6.0-1ubuntu3] (no packageset) | 06:15 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted puma [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [3.6.0-1ubuntu3] | 06:25 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted puma [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [3.6.0-1ubuntu3] | 06:25 | |
slangasek | tsimonq2: on the nodejs front, is node-tape anything that's on your radar? Debian bug #893337 | 06:27 |
ubot5 | Debian bug 893337 in node-tape "node-tape: autopkgtest broken in new version" [Normal,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/893337 | 06:27 |
tsimonq2 | slangasek: Ah, I hadn't seen that; thanks. | 06:28 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: virtualbox-hwe [i386] (bionic-proposed/multiverse) [5.2.8-dfsg-5ubuntu18.04.1] (no packageset) | 06:29 | |
tsimonq2 | slangasek: Is that already badtested? | 06:29 |
slangasek | tsimonq2: it is not. | 06:29 |
tsimonq2 | slangasek: Do you plan on badtesting it? | 06:29 |
slangasek | the version in -proposed has regressed the tess | 06:29 |
tsimonq2 | Ah. | 06:29 |
slangasek | no | 06:29 |
tsimonq2 | Gotcha. | 06:29 |
slangasek | (I plan on removing it from -proposed, if no one cares about it) | 06:30 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mir [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [0.31.0.1-0ubuntu1] (desktop-core) | 06:31 | |
tsimonq2 | My vote is do it . | 06:31 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mir [armhf] (bionic-proposed/main) [0.31.0.1-0ubuntu1] (desktop-core) | 06:35 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: virtualbox-hwe [amd64] (bionic-proposed/multiverse) [5.2.8-dfsg-5ubuntu18.04.1] (no packageset) | 06:37 | |
slangasek | tsimonq2: done. | 06:37 |
tsimonq2 | slangasek: cool | 06:38 |
tsimonq2 | slangasek: Can I please get "force-badtest node-class-utils/0.3.5-1" added to hints? It's regressed in release: http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/n/node-class-utils | 06:59 |
tsimonq2 | Thanks. | 07:04 |
tsimonq2 | General note: sbuild should migrate now with this new upload. | 07:27 |
acheronuk | slangasek: ksaneplugin removed from Kubuntu supported | 07:34 |
slangasek | acheronuk: cheers | 07:34 |
=== ochosi_ is now known as ochosi | ||
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pyxs [source] (artful-proposed) [0.4.1+dfsg1-0ubuntu1~17.10.0] | 09:31 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pyxs [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.4.1+dfsg1-0ubuntu1~16.04.0] | 09:32 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pyxs [amd64] (artful-proposed/none) [0.4.1+dfsg1-0ubuntu1~17.10.0] (no packageset) | 09:32 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pyxs [amd64] (xenial-proposed/none) [0.4.1+dfsg1-0ubuntu1~16.04.0] (no packageset) | 09:34 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pyxs [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.4.1+dfsg1-0ubuntu1~17.10.0] | 09:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pyxs [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [0.4.1+dfsg1-0ubuntu1~16.04.0] | 09:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rax-nova-agent [source] (artful-proposed) [2.1.12-0ubuntu2~17.10.0] | 10:16 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rax-nova-agent [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.1.12-0ubuntu2~16.04.0] | 10:21 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rax-nova-agent [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.1.12-0ubuntu2~17.10.0] (no packageset) | 10:46 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rax-nova-agent [amd64] (xenial-proposed/universe) [2.1.12-0ubuntu2~16.04.0] (no packageset) | 10:47 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rax-nova-agent [amd64] (artful-proposed) [2.1.12-0ubuntu2~17.10.0] | 11:00 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rax-nova-agent [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [2.1.12-0ubuntu2~16.04.0] | 11:00 | |
cjwatson | slangasek: I guess I should technically ask for a feature freeze exception for versioned Provides support in germinate? Though I've just deployed it on nusakan and I'm not sure changing it in the distro is risky by comparison :) | 11:23 |
sil2100 | cjwatson: I guess it would be good to have that documented with an FFe ;) | 11:25 |
cjwatson | sil2100: repurposing https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/germinate/+bug/1758004 for that then | 11:26 |
ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1758004 in Ubuntu on IBM z Systems "[Ubuntu 18.04] Error installing the "Basic Ubuntu Server"" [High,Triaged] | 11:26 |
cjwatson | I've diffed full germinate output before and after that change and confirmed that every resulting difference is correct | 11:26 |
cjwatson | (basically python{,3}-cffi-backend, some e2fsprogs transitional library packages dropping out, and some espeak packages dropping out because espeak-ng is now sufficient) | 11:27 |
cjwatson | (the last doesn't affect images, only extra output) | 11:28 |
sil2100 | cjwatson: I approved the FFe o/ Thanks! | 11:36 |
sil2100 | (oh well formallities) | 11:37 |
cjwatson | thank you | 11:38 |
LocutusOfBorg | jamespage, hello, can you please do a python-msgpack/msgpack-python switch and merge from debian? | 14:53 |
LocutusOfBorg | I can do it, but I have no way of testing the work | 14:54 |
LocutusOfBorg | see https://packages.qa.debian.org/p/python-msgpack/news/20180323T133924Z.html | 14:54 |
LocutusOfBorg | and https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=893844 | 14:54 |
ubot5 | Debian bug 893844 in borgbackup "borgbackup: upgrade of python3-msgpack creates version conflict" [Serious,Open] | 14:54 |
LocutusOfBorg | jamespage, something like that https://launchpad.net/~costamagnagianfranco/+archive/ubuntu/locutusofborg-ppa/+sourcepub/8875622/+listing-archive-extra | 15:00 |
LocutusOfBorg | even if renaming the package makes my brain segfault for upgrade path | 15:00 |
jamespage | LocutusOfBorg: yes but won't be today... | 15:01 |
LocutusOfBorg | I can do it, I'm already testing the upgrade path | 15:03 |
LocutusOfBorg | that packaging should provide msgpack and python-msgpack so we should be safe | 15:04 |
LocutusOfBorg | but in case, I would like to do a no-change rebuild of reverse-deps to be safe | 15:04 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-wallpapers [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [18.04.0-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) | 15:31 | |
=== jbicha_ is now known as jbicha | ||
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapcraft (xenial-proposed/universe) [2.39.3+really2.35 => 2.40] (no packageset) | 15:58 | |
sergiusens | tjaalton: mind accepting ^ | 15:59 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: python-msgpack (bionic-proposed/primary) [0.5.4-0ubuntu2] | 16:33 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xdg-user-dirs (xenial-proposed/main) [0.15-2ubuntu6 => 0.15-2ubuntu6.16.04.1] (core) | 16:40 | |
tjaalton | sergiusens: where's artful? | 16:46 |
sergiusens | tjaalton: coming soon | 16:47 |
tjaalton | how soon :) | 16:47 |
tjaalton | I'm practically EOW | 16:48 |
sergiusens | 10' | 16:53 |
sergiusens | tjaalton: done | 17:03 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapcraft (artful-proposed/universe) [2.35+17.10 => 2.40+17.10] (no packageset) | 17:04 | |
sergiusens | slangasek: mind accepting snapcraft into -proposed please? I think I might have missed Timo and his EOW warning | 17:48 |
=== alan_g is now known as alan_g|EOW | ||
slangasek | sergiusens: sure, I will look at it | 18:11 |
sergiusens | thank you very much | 18:16 |
slangasek | sergiusens: you're wanting to land this in -proposed before the current one is released to -updates? | 18:17 |
sergiusens | slangasek: if that is artful, yes, please pop 2.35+17.10 out of circulation; it will not even work on artful | 18:19 |
slangasek | ok | 18:19 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapcraft [source] (artful-proposed) [2.40+17.10] | 18:29 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: python-certbot-dns-cloudflare (bionic-proposed/primary) [0.22.0-1] | 19:00 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: neutron (artful-proposed/main) [2:11.0.3-0ubuntu1 => 2:11.0.3-0ubuntu1.1] (openstack, ubuntu-server) | 19:01 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: python-certbot-dns-dnsimple (bionic-proposed/primary) [0.22.0-1] | 19:01 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: python-certbot-dns-digitalocean (bionic-proposed/primary) [0.22.0-1] | 19:01 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: python-certbot-dns-google (bionic-proposed/primary) [0.22.0-1] | 19:01 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: python-certbot-dns-rfc2136 (bionic-proposed/primary) [0.22.0-1] | 19:02 | |
tjaalton | slangasek: re nss-pem; the pkg I uploaded merges src:nss source in it, but maybe it would be best to do the other way round instead (nss-pem is <100k unpacked), though that might end up being a permanent diff to debian since I doubt mike would accept that either.. | 19:05 |
tjaalton | "talk to upstream.." (which finally rejected it some years ago) | 19:06 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapcraft [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.40] | 19:21 | |
slangasek | tjaalton: hey, so, I was surprised when you said that was how you were handling nss-pem; I think duplicating the source of such a security-sensitive codebase as nss is not a great option | 19:23 |
slangasek | tjaalton: I understand that you can't use the existing nss package because the libraries/headers are not made public by the Debian maintainer | 19:23 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: neutron (xenial-proposed/main) [2:8.4.0-0ubuntu7.1 => 2:8.4.0-0ubuntu7.2] (openstack, ubuntu-server) | 19:24 | |
slangasek | tjaalton: but I don't understand why we're considering that decision by the Debian maintainer binding for what Ubuntu does. Why do we not take a decision to support these as public interfaces, regardless of what Debian has decided, and carry a delta? | 19:24 |
slangasek | it's not like we're creating our own shared libraries here... upstream is already shipping shared libraries, they just aren't shipped in /usr/lib | 19:25 |
tjaalton | slangasek: well nss-pem needs static libs, of non-public interfaces that haven't changed in many years | 19:44 |
tjaalton | sure we can carry a delta, if that's ok. but would that be packaging the headers/static libs on a separate package as proposed? | 19:45 |
tjaalton | feel free to drop current nss-pem and I'll create a proper one, and can upload nss too with the new pkg | 19:47 |
tjaalton | slangasek: put something in bug #1751140 so that it's not lost :) | 19:51 |
ubot5 | bug 1751140 in nss (Ubuntu) "nss-pem needs additional headers, static libs to build" [Undecided,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1751140 | 19:51 |
slangasek | tjaalton: oh, these are interfaces that are currently not exposed at all in any of the shared objects, including those in /usr/lib/nss? | 19:53 |
tjaalton | not all no | 20:00 |
tjaalton | nssb can't be shared or there would be a circular dep | 20:04 |
slangasek | ok | 20:08 |
slangasek | let me ponder a bit more then | 20:08 |
tjaalton | i might have more in emails from the redhat folks, need to check later.. | 20:10 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lttng-modules [source] (artful-proposed) [2.9.0-1ubuntu3.2] | 20:25 | |
tjaalton | slangasek: there's one thing though that might help with the decision; redhat is actively replacing nss with openssl, but certmonger hasn't been ported yet but it will be, at some point | 20:26 |
tjaalton | so, could be the path of least effort is to provide only freeipa-client in the archive, and I'll put the rest in a ppa | 20:27 |
slangasek | tjaalton: well, if you choose to withdraw this from the archive, that certainly spares me from having to make any decision, true ;) | 20:27 |
tjaalton | just need to advise folks doing upgrades to enable the ppa | 20:28 |
slangasek | I don't think there's any obligation that you do this | 20:29 |
slangasek | I hate to encourage use of ppas | 20:29 |
tjaalton | well, for freeipa-server users.. | 20:29 |
slangasek | and would rather figure out the right way to accept nss-pem | 20:29 |
tjaalton | sure | 20:29 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron [source] (artful-proposed) [2:11.0.3-0ubuntu1.1] | 20:56 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron [source] (xenial-proposed) [2:8.4.0-0ubuntu7.2] | 20:57 | |
LocutusOfBorg | [18:33:42] <LocutusOfBorg> please accept python-msgpack, it follows the same renaming that Debian did | 21:11 |
LocutusOfBorg | [18:33:49] <LocutusOfBorg> msgpack-python -> python-msgpack | 21:11 |
LocutusOfBorg | [18:33:54] <LocutusOfBorg> there aren't new binaries | 21:11 |
tsimonq2 | infinity: Did you have any luck figuring out the critical Lubuntu install bug? | 23:29 |
tsimonq2 | infinity: If not, might you have notes so I can take a look? | 23:29 |
slangasek | tsimonq2: pointer to this? | 23:33 |
tsimonq2 | sec | 23:34 |
tsimonq2 | slangasek: bug 1754174 | 23:36 |
ubot5 | bug 1754174 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "[Lubuntu] "Install Lubuntu" fails with several commands not found and permission denied" [Critical,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1754174 | 23:36 |
slangasek | ah that one's still around? | 23:36 |
tsimonq2 | I guess so | 23:37 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-defaults-ports [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.175ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) | 23:41 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-defaults-ports [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.175ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) | 23:41 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!