| flexiondotorg | slangasek: I uploaded mate-desktop yesterday to fix a bug with upgrading. | 01:04 |
|---|---|---|
| flexiondotorg | It hasn't migrated out of proposed, I don't see anything in excuses. | 01:05 |
| flexiondotorg | Lots of user keep bumping into the issue this update fixes. | 01:05 |
| flexiondotorg | Any idea why it is not migrating from proposed? | 01:06 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted deal.ii [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [8.5.1-1] | 01:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wxpython4.0 [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [4.0.1+dfsg-2] | 01:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wxpython4.0 [i386] (bionic-proposed) [4.0.1+dfsg-2] | 01:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wxpython4.0 [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [4.0.1+dfsg-2] | 01:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wxpython4.0 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.0.1+dfsg-2] | 01:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wxpython4.0 [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [4.0.1+dfsg-2] | 01:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wxpython4.0 [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [4.0.1+dfsg-2] | 01:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted deal.ii [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [8.5.1-1] | 01:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted deal.ii [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [8.5.1-1] | 01:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted deal.ii [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [8.5.1-1] | 01:06 | |
| tsimonq2 | flexiondotorg: The update output says that it makes gir1.2-mate-desktop uninstallable, on at minimum armhf. | 01:07 |
| slangasek | flexiondotorg: because it's not "correctly" replacing the package, when you are still building it from this same source package | 01:07 |
| slangasek | flexiondotorg: also, unversioned Breaks+Replaces is almost never correct; it's unversioned Conflicts+Replaces, or versioned Breaks+Replaces; see policy | 01:08 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kubuntu-wallpapers [source] (bionic-proposed) [18.04.0] | 03:38 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kubuntu-wallpapers [amd64] (bionic-proposed/none) [18.04.0] (no packageset) | 03:44 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-software (xenial-proposed/main) [3.20.5-0ubuntu0.16.04.8 => 3.20.5-0ubuntu0.16.04.10] (ubuntu-desktop) | 04:09 | |
| === maclin1 is now known as maclin | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ceph (artful-proposed/main) [12.2.2-0ubuntu0.17.10.1 => 12.2.4-0ubuntu0.17.10.1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) | 07:11 | |
| didrocks | sil2100: hey! I know that seb128 opened the FFe, but I think he didn't suscribe the release team. As now, I want to upload the first components, I added more info and suscribe the team on bug #1755456. Do you mind having a look? | 07:53 |
| ubot5 | bug 1755456 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "[ffe] Optional recording/sending of installer&system details to help improving Ubuntu" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1755456 | 07:53 |
| sil2100 | didrocks: hey! Sure | 07:55 |
| didrocks | thanks :) | 07:55 |
| sil2100 | didrocks: approved | 08:12 |
| sil2100 | (why soo laaatee?!) | 08:13 |
| didrocks | sil2100: because the request was after FF already | 08:13 |
| didrocks | (so not even started developping) | 08:13 |
| didrocks | thanks! | 08:13 |
| juliank | I guess I'll fix adequate to not fail autopkgtest | 08:38 |
| juliank | the fix was trivial: inserting a ? in a regesx | 08:50 |
| juliank | (ldd removed a comma in its output for undefined symbols, hence I added a ? after the comma in the regex :D) | 08:51 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: ubuntu-report (bionic-proposed/primary) [1.0.0] | 10:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntu-report [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.0] | 10:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-report [s390x] (bionic-proposed/none) [1.0.0] (no packageset) | 10:29 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-report [amd64] (bionic-proposed/none) [1.0.0] (no packageset) | 10:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-report [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/none) [1.0.0] (no packageset) | 10:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-report [i386] (bionic-proposed/none) [1.0.0] (no packageset) | 10:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-report [arm64] (bionic-proposed/none) [1.0.0] (no packageset) | 10:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-report [armhf] (bionic-proposed/none) [1.0.0] (no packageset) | 10:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntu-report [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.0] | 10:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntu-report [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.0] | 10:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntu-report [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.0] | 10:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntu-report [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.0] | 10:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntu-report [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.0] | 10:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntu-report [i386] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.0] | 10:37 | |
| acheronuk | apw or anyone else: could the kubuntu-wallpapers binary be accepted please? | 11:13 |
| sil2100 | acheronuk: let me take a look | 11:26 |
| sil2100 | acheronuk: do you know who reviewed the source? | 11:27 |
| acheronuk | sil2100: slangasek did AFAIK | 11:27 |
| sil2100 | Ok | 11:28 |
| sil2100 | Looking at it now | 11:28 |
| sil2100 | acheronuk: all good, done | 11:30 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kubuntu-wallpapers [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [18.04.0] | 11:31 | |
| acheronuk | sil2100: Great. Thank you. BTW, that is likely to be the last new source we need for 18.04, so could Kubuntu perhaps get a packageset update, once my bzr push to our seeds adding that registers? | 11:33 |
| acheronuk | well, if not last, we can motu others | 11:33 |
| sil2100 | acheronuk: I did one in the morning today | 11:40 |
| sil2100 | Ah | 11:40 |
| sil2100 | Packageset! | 11:40 |
| sil2100 | Sorry, mis-read | 11:40 |
| sil2100 | Yeah | 11:40 |
| acheronuk | sil2100: yup | 11:40 |
| acheronuk | if it's convenient. no huge rush | 11:41 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted plymouth [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.9.2-3ubuntu13.3] | 11:57 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xdg-user-dirs [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.15-2ubuntu6.16.04.1] | 12:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: neutron (xenial-proposed/main) [2:8.4.0-0ubuntu7.2 => 2:8.4.0-0ubuntu7.3] (openstack, ubuntu-server) | 13:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libreoffice (artful-proposed/main) [1:5.4.5-0ubuntu0.17.10.5 => 1:5.4.6-0ubuntu0.17.10.1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) | 13:29 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libreoffice-l10n (artful-proposed/main) [1:5.4.5-0ubuntu0.17.10.1 => 1:5.4.6-0ubuntu0.17.10.1] (ubuntu-desktop) | 13:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: neutron (artful-proposed/main) [2:11.0.3-0ubuntu1.1 => 2:11.0.3-0ubuntu2] (openstack, ubuntu-server) | 13:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (artful-proposed/main) [17.2-35-gf576b2a2-0ubuntu1~17.10.2 => 18.2-0ubuntu1~17.10.1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server) | 13:49 | |
| sil2100 | acheronuk: actually, since Final Beta is really close, could you regenerate the required bits from https://community.kde.org/Kubuntu/L10n ? If needed, of course | 15:19 |
| sil2100 | acheronuk: also, I started https://help.ubuntu.com/community/BionicUpgrades - could you start preparing the Kubuntu version of the upgrade document? | 15:30 |
| slangasek | Laney: so I seem to have successfully received a test mail from autopkgtest-web/0 | 15:45 |
| Laney | good | 15:46 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zfs-linux (xenial-proposed/main) [0.6.5.6-0ubuntu19 => 0.6.5.6-0ubuntu20] (no packageset) | 15:47 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zfs-linux (artful-proposed/main) [0.6.5.11-1ubuntu3.2 => 0.6.5.11-1ubuntu3.3] (core) | 15:48 | |
| Laney | maybe if we just remove ssmtp from autopkgtest-cloud-worker/3 the juju configured postfix will take over and work | 15:49 |
| Laney | hmm that one doesn't have relayhost | 15:50 |
| acheronuk | sil2100: our language packs don't need regenerating in that fashion. they are a static tarball release | 16:12 |
| acheronuk | sil2100: ack on the upgrade wiki | 16:13 |
| sil2100 | acheronuk: so the versions from 17th are all good for final beta? | 16:13 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-gcp [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1002.2] | 16:20 | |
| acheronuk | sil2100: yes. in fact,most kde now ships translations with each individual source, and those l10n cover the small amount of left over things that haven't changed in a long time | 16:21 |
| sil2100 | Excellent | 16:24 |
| cjwatson | Redeployed a bug-fixed version of the changes that broke the publisher yesterday, so keeping an eye on it. | 16:42 |
| doko | with ruby-debugger-ruby-core-source and subversion migrated, I'm removing ruby2.3 \o/ | 17:16 |
| nacc | doko: nice! | 17:17 |
| slangasek | woohoo | 17:17 |
| doko | now get that node-js thing migrating ... | 17:18 |
| cjwatson | Publisher looks fine. | 17:20 |
| cjwatson | Just as well since I'm off out. :) | 17:21 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: neutron (xenial-proposed/main) [2:8.4.0-0ubuntu7.2 => 2:8.4.0-0ubuntu7.3] (openstack, ubuntu-server) | 17:23 | |
| doko | slangasek: the recent gcc-7 upload has the backport for the armhf build failure you mentioned last week. sorry, can't remember the package name, but you can revert that -O1 workaround | 17:27 |
| slangasek | doko: ok, I can't remember the package either ;) I guess I'll look at -changes later to figure it out, thanks | 17:36 |
| ginggs | is it possible to remove node-is-glob 4.0.0-1 from proposed? it seems to break a couple of things | 17:37 |
| ginggs | and I think node-policyfile/0.0.5-3ubuntu1 can be removed from release, it has no rdeps, and uses deprecated process.EventEmitter | 17:40 |
| slangasek | ginggs: node-is-glob: why do we consider this a bug in node-is-glob, as opposed to a bug in the things that have not been updated to be compatible with it? | 17:49 |
| slangasek | if the upstream answer is that the revdeps need to be updated, why not leave node-is-glob in -proposed until they're fixed (possibly next cycle)? | 17:49 |
| slangasek | (one possible valid answer is that node-is-glob should also then have versioned Breaks against prior versions of its old revdeps) | 17:50 |
| slangasek | ginggs: node-policyfile> the current autopkgtest failure seems to be more than just a deprecation issue. is process.EventEmitter obsolete? has its interface changed? Should Debian bug #872894 have its severity raised? | 17:52 |
| ubot5 | Debian bug 872894 in src:node-policyfile "node-policyfile: autopkgtests fail with nodejs 6" [Important,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/872894 | 17:52 |
| ginggs | slangasek: re: node-policyfile first it was a warning, now it is a failure. so yes, I think the severity should be bumped | 17:53 |
| slangasek | ginggs: if you do so I will use that as the justification for removal from bionic | 17:55 |
| ginggs | slangasek: ok | 17:56 |
| ginggs | slangasek: re: is-glob I don't understand why node-glob-base, node-glob-parent and node-parse-glob autopkgtests are now pulling in node-is-glob from -proposed, which then fails | 17:58 |
| ginggs | slangasek: I bumped the severity of 872894 | 18:09 |
| tsimonq2 | doko: What was decided re: src:mercurial? | 18:10 |
| doko | tsimonq2: no idea, please see http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html | 18:13 |
| tsimonq2 | doko: You pinged me yesterday in #ubuntu-devel ... | 18:18 |
| doko | tsimonq2: no decision, however the autopkg tests still fail | 18:28 |
| tsimonq2 | doko: Please remove it from proposed then. | 18:30 |
| ginggs | slangasek: node-glob-base, node-glob-parent and node-parse-glob upstreams all have issues open for months, with no progress | 18:30 |
| tsimonq2 | slangasek: peruse> So, how might I do version numbers going forward until it's synced? | 18:33 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (xenial-proposed/main) [17.2-35-gf576b2a2-0ubuntu1~16.04.2 => 18.2-0ubuntu1~16.04.1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server) | 18:39 | |
| slangasek | tsimonq2: sorry, I'm not sure I have context - last we talked about peruse was the private library, what's the versioning question? | 18:50 |
| tsimonq2 | slangasek: Someone accepted it after I screwed up and uploaded a Debian version | 18:53 |
| tsimonq2 | slangasek: Look at the version in Bionic. | 18:53 |
| slangasek | tsimonq2: ok, so next upload add in ubuntu1 to the versioning | 18:56 |
| slangasek | it'll still be "wrong" because it should really be 1.2+dfsg-0ubuntu1 instead of 1.2+dfsg-1ubuntu1, but it'll be less wrong | 18:56 |
| tsimonq2 | slangasek: ack, thanks. | 18:58 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (artful-proposed/main) [17.2-35-gf576b2a2-0ubuntu1~17.10.2 => 18.2-0ubuntu1~17.10.1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server) | 19:28 | |
| blackboxsw | arges: or rbasak: if there is time today we have a couple of queued uploads for artful and xenial proposed for cloud-init for a new SRU | 19:31 |
| blackboxsw | our new SRU bug is https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-init/+bug/1759318 | 19:31 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1759318 in cloud-init "Release 18.2" [Medium,Fix released] | 19:31 |
| blackboxsw | oops paste fail | 19:32 |
| blackboxsw | our new SRU for cloud-init is https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1759406 | 19:32 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1759406 in cloud-init (Ubuntu) "sru cloud-init (17.2-35-gf576b2a2-0ubuntu1~16.04.1 update to 18.2-0ubuntu1~16.04.1)" [Medium,Confirmed] | 19:32 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: iotjs (bionic-proposed/primary) [1.0-1] | 20:32 | |
| === beisner is now known as beisner-afk | ||
| LocutusOfBorg | sigh, glib2.0 needs some care, I can't really reproduce locally | 21:17 |
| LocutusOfBorg | GLib-GIO:ERROR:../../../../../gio/tests/network-monitor.c:171:reach_cb: assertion failed (error == NULL): Host unreachable (g-io-error-quark, 37) | 21:17 |
| LocutusOfBorg | Bail out! GLib-GIO:ERROR:../../../../../gio/tests/network-monitor.c:171:reach_cb: assertion failed (error == NULL): Host unreachable (g-io-error-quark, 37) | 21:17 |
| LocutusOfBorg | FAIL: glib/network-monitor.test (Child process killed by signal 6) | 21:17 |
| LocutusOfBorg | this seems a regression in some infrastructure configuration? | 21:17 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: arch-install-scripts (bionic-proposed/primary) [18-1] | 22:33 | |
| xnox | slangasek, ruby2.3 can be removed now \o/ https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby2.3/+bug/1759707 | 22:34 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1759707 in ruby2.3 (Ubuntu) "RM ruby2.3 superseeded by ruby2.5" [Critical,Triaged] | 22:34 |
| slangasek | xnox: I think doko already removed it this morning | 22:35 |
| xnox | ah | 22:35 |
| xnox | then my local cache proxy charm is behind rsyncing the archive. | 22:35 |
| xnox | sorry for the noise. | 22:35 |
| slangasek | :) | 22:35 |
| tsimonq2 | slangasek: This isn't release-critical, but currently the switch to Calamares on Lubuntu Next is blocked by some bad kernel handling. https://bazaar.launchpad.net/%7Ekdeneon/livecd-rootfs-neon/bionic/revision/1363 has the details on what I think should probably be done; I can either write a script for Calamares to do lots of kernel hackery or just special case that change for Lubuntu Next. It'd | 22:35 |
| tsimonq2 | also be good to know if ubiquity is hardcoded anywhere in the tooling so I can special-case Lubuntu Next... | 22:36 |
| tsimonq2 | (because ofc Lubuntu Next isn't getting a release, yet) | 22:36 |
| tsimonq2 | slangasek: Of course this'll eventually become more urgent because Kubuntu's going to make the same move next cycle. | 22:37 |
| slangasek | tsimonq2: I don't think that should be done at all; I think if you're going to switch installers, you should integrate with the existing interfaces provided by the other components in the distro... | 22:39 |
| tsimonq2 | slangasek: d-i? | 22:40 |
| slangasek | that's nothing to do with d-i | 22:40 |
| slangasek | it's casper, and livecd-rootfs | 22:41 |
| tsimonq2 | So, you don't think *what* should be done? : | 22:41 |
| tsimonq2 | *:) | 22:41 |
| slangasek | tsimonq2: you said it has the details on what you think should probably be done, and it points to a commit that shows setting BINARY_REMOVE_LINUX=false, and I think that's a wrong solution | 22:41 |
| tsimonq2 | slangasek: Ah. | 22:42 |
| slangasek | because that means you get an extra unused copy of vmlinuz on your image inside the squashfs which duplicates the one used to boot the image | 22:42 |
| tsimonq2 | Makes sense. | 22:42 |
| tsimonq2 | So, I'll see what code Ubiquity has hidden in install.py to do this kernel mangling correctly. | 22:43 |
| === rbalint_ is now known as rbalint | ||
| === beisner-afk is now known as beisner | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!