=== ika is now known as Guest71867 === led_ir23 is now known as led_ir22 [06:53] networking, with other windows computers [06:54] to view other window computers on the network. === ole_ is now known as ole_denmark [10:11] Hello world !! [11:01] why write mate54420 Hello world ? [12:26] Hi All. Is it possible to install Packages from the Studio Version into the Mate Version. It has been awhile since I have been using Linux. I put together a couple computers from spare parts and this one is XP64- Ubuntu Mate Dual Boot. Any help is greatly appreciated. Thanks [13:15] Just install them if they are available in the repo? [13:34] Sorry- was using PIA VPN- disconnected VPN now [13:35] New to Ubuntu- where can I connect to Repo? [13:35] Lanner900Z: mention one example package that you want to install [13:36] Right now I want a package to burn ISO's [13:36] Don't have a package name yet. [13:36] Do you have a specific package name? I thought you were looking for specific packages from Ubuntu studio... [13:36] OK, then try brasero [13:36] It used to be preinstalled in previous Ubuntu versions [13:37] Lanner900Z: what version of ubuntu are you using? [13:37] Okay wil do- Thanks- I see that Studio offers a Guitar Effects Package- I would like to get that. [13:37] 17.10 Mate [13:38] Lanner900Z: https://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=guitarix [13:39] Lanner900Z: i think this should get you sorted by adding the ubuntu studio repo to regular ubuntu: "sudo su -c 'echo deb http://archive.ubuntustudio.org/ubuntustudio artful main >> /etc/apt/sources.list' wget -q http://archive.ubuntustudio.org/ubuntustudio.gpg -O- | sudo apt-key add - && sudo apt-get update" [13:39] then you have access to every software from studio [13:40] let me know if it works i might of made a mistake [13:40] Thanks I will see how things go [13:40] Thanks again [13:55] Got to Jet for the moment- work to do. Bye all [15:13] hellow from a glad mateowner www.olehasselbalch.dk/s.mov [15:14] don't laugh [15:55] hello from cold denmark [16:21] Is there a unified directory that mate shortcut configurations [16:21] can go to? [16:22] yetoo: what is "shortcut configurations"? [16:22] Like configurations for shortcuts [16:22] Yeah, that doesn't help [16:22] like a file that contains user defined shortcuts [16:22] Keyboard shortcuts? [16:22] Yes [16:22] But wait [16:23] I'm not talking about the global keybaord shotcuts that just opens applications [16:23] I'm talking shortcuts for individual applications [16:23] of the mate caliber [16:23] So you mean that you would create a file in a directory where you would define that ctrl+c is copy in firefox? [16:24] Application shortcuts are not defined by the desktop environment [16:25] Look, essentially I'm looking for something to edit in the gconf editor [16:25] gconf is deprecated in favor of gsettings [16:25] gsettings are written in the dconf database [16:25] If yo ucan change internal application shortcuts that way [16:25] that's what i meant dconf [16:25] Many applications don't care at all about dconf, they don't even use it [16:26] So it depends on the specific application that you want [16:26] Alright, because some mate applications don't allow one to change their shortcuts [16:26] unless you go into the source code [16:27] like the mate-system-monitor [16:27] I think it'd be best if you mentioned a specific example and what you want to do with it [16:28] I want to change the sigterm shortcuts for mate-system-monitor to single key preses rather than ctrl + a key press [16:28] *a key press -> [16:28] For example, you can see its settings with: gsettings list-recursively org.mate.system-monitor [16:28] There are no shortcut settings there, so that application doesn't allow defining shortcuts with gsettings [16:29] So yes, you'd need to change its source code and rebuid it yourself [16:29] You could also file a bug report in case the developers see it as something useful to implement [17:49] hi [19:03] i think this means i have duplicate sources https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/YFPPgb9cHn/ any help? [19:08] linuxliam: sudo mv /etc/apt/sources.list.d/signal-xenial.list /etc/apt/sources.list.d/signal-xenial.list.bad [19:22] what did ubuntu mate do to make snaps look better [19:23] as in theming [20:01] any of the dev's hang out in here? [20:03] Kwisher: ubuntu-mate devs or mate devs? [20:03] !ask [20:03] Please don't ask to ask a question, simply ask the question (all on ONE line and in the channel, so that others can read and follow it easily). If anyone knows the answer they will most likely reply. :-) See also !patience [20:04] alkisg: i'm not an irc noob :) [20:05] and the channel is called #ubuntu-mate not #mate [20:05] Kwisher: eh, I should have known by your name that you know the difference between ubuntu-mate and mate devs [20:05] so yes, ubuntu-mate dev's [20:05] Oh no, I can't know that by your name [20:06] So excuse me but I had to ask, as 99% of users that come here don't know it [20:06] So yeah the one and only ubuntu-mate developer is here [20:06] and i did ask a question so not seeing the reason for your hounding me [20:07] I was trying to help, and you started correcting me [20:07] Anyways, bbl [20:15] anyways, i seen this post on G+ the other day: https://plus.google.com/u/0/+JoeHecht/posts/CxCiwgLzeBW [20:16] i think someone from the dev team should respond to it to make any needed coreections [20:20] Google plus is not an appropriate channel for bug reports; there's github and launchpad for that; and, I had already filed a similar bug report and it's been addressed [20:21] I.e. now the metapackages in 18.04 mostly recommend and don't depend on packages [20:26] but, removing the metapackage(s) doesn't cause any breakage, correct? [20:26] It may, but usually not [20:27] The live cd seeding process marks the dependencies as manually installed [20:27] If it didn't, then after removing e.g. firefox, which would remove the metapackage, [20:27] if after that the user did an `apt purge --auto-remove` just to clean his system, he'd remove all of the dependencies [20:27] I.e. would get a system without mate [20:28] sure about that? [20:28] So that affects users that installed ubuntu-mate as a package, but not the ones that used a live cd, as in the live cd they're marked as manually installed by the seeding process [20:28] 99,9% [20:28] I checked it a couple of months ago [20:28] ok, i see the difference [21:09] alkisg: ever tried budgie? [21:58] buenas noches ubunteros!!!!