[10:26] <ricotz> tseliot, hi :\, the gpu ppa is not a playground
[10:26] <tseliot> ricotz: oh, no, sorry, I uploaded to the wrong PPA
[10:26] <tseliot> that was meant for my GLVND ppa
[10:26] <ricotz> you dropped a bunch of transitionals and the 4.16 compat patch
[10:27] <tseliot> I used my sources, that's why
[10:28] <ricotz> tseliot, https://launchpadlibrarian.net/363210244/nvidia-graphics-drivers-390_390.48-0ubuntu0~gpu18.04.1_390.48-0ubuntu1~ppa1.diff.gz
[10:28] <ricotz> please revert it
[10:29] <tseliot> ricotz: sure, give me a minute
[10:34] <ricotz> tseliot, I will do it
[10:35] <tseliot> I am doing it
[10:36] <tseliot> ricotz: ^^
[10:37] <ricotz> tseliot, ok, then do it fast
[10:38] <tseliot> ricotz: I'll version it 390.48-0ubuntu1+gpu18.04.1, ok?
[10:39] <ricotz> no
[10:39] <ricotz> 1~ppa18.04.1
[10:39] <tseliot> ricotz: ok
[10:39] <ricotz> or if you don't intend to add a 4.16 then +gpu18.04.1 is better
[10:39] <tseliot> I'm reverting everything
[10:40] <tseliot> that upload wasn't meant for that PPA
[10:41] <ricotz> tseliot, ok, I could have uploaded/reverted it 5 mins ago
[10:42] <tseliot> ricotz: ok, do it then
[10:42] <tseliot> having a git repository would make things much easier
[10:42] <ricotz> pushed
[10:42] <ricotz> tseliot, this is ppa specific
[10:43] <ricotz> the 4.16 patch is a hack, the transitionals could be made official, but they would still clutter the packaging
[10:43] <tseliot> I'm not sure why having a branch for the PPA (and different releases) would be a bad thing
[10:44] <ricotz> this would not have made a difference in this case
[10:45] <tseliot> sure it would have. Git revert, update the changelog, upload, done
[10:45] <ricotz> I will let you known if there is a archive-worthy change
[10:45] <ricotz> but you would still had it uploaded to the wrong ppa
[10:46] <tseliot> sure, but it's easier to amend mistakes
[10:47] <ricotz> tseliot, btw, I used a tweaked version of the old packaging to xenial/artful to update 390 there with it new tarball layout
[10:48] <tseliot> ricotz: I'm going to rewrite the old packaging anyway, but I'll have a look at that too
[10:48] <ricotz> tseliot, you still intend the backport the new packaging?
[10:49] <tseliot> ricotz: yes, partially, though, since we won't have glvnd
[10:49] <ricotz> oh, so not real backporting to the multiarch'ed package?
[10:49] <ricotz> right, the gl-alternatives and glvnd are the tricky parts
[10:50] <tseliot> yep. I haven't quite figured out the details yet though
[10:51] <ricotz> tseliot, this is basically it -- https://paste.debian.net/plain/1018472
[10:52] <ricotz> so just the essentials to use the new tarballs
[10:52] <tseliot> right
[10:54] <ricotz> tseliot, I assume you are aware of https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-kernel/ubuntu/+source/linux/+git/bionic/commit/?h=master-next&id=527d1e11406d4416fe4e0a79ca41a04414f25493
[10:55] <ricotz> dkms nvidia obviously fails currently due the missing of "scripts/ubuntu-retpoline-extract-one"
[10:56] <tseliot> ricotz: no, I didn't see that. Yesterday I came back from holidays
[10:57] <ricotz> ok
[10:58] <tseliot> ricotz: you said it fails now?
[10:59] <ricotz> yes, with 4.15.0-14.15, this commit will be included in the next build
[10:59] <tseliot> apw: ^^
[10:59] <ricotz> 4.15.0-14.15 is in -proposed
[11:00] <ricotz> he is aware and this mentioned commit is the fix
[11:00] <tseliot> oh, ok
[11:00] <apw> ricotz, yep, we know about that one, it is being applied to places as we speak
[11:00] <apw> all a bit of a mess
[11:00] <apw> luckily that kernel is only in -proposed and won't 
[11:01] <apw> be going anywhere else soon
[11:01] <tseliot> good
[13:56] <mamarley> ricotz: The nvidia-390 package you uploaded earlier fails to build with 4.15.0-14 with "/bin/bash: ./debian/scripts/retpoline-extract-one: No such file or directory".
[13:57] <mamarley> It builds fine against 4.16.0 from the mainline kernel builds.
[14:00] <ricotz> mamarley, this is kernel package bug
[14:00] <mamarley> Ah, OK, sorry to bother you.
[14:01] <ricotz> mamarley, the upload was just to revert an accident
[14:01] <mamarley> I know, I read that part earlier.
[14:02] <ricotz> mamarley, ok, this bug was mentioned as well ;)
[14:19] <mamarley> I guess I didn't read it closely enough them.