[00:53] Bug #1761342 opened: [2.4+, enhancement] rackd needs to have different worker(s) to handle http request [02:29] Bug #1761359 opened: [2.4, UI] Region always sends trigger notifications for all handlers to client [04:18] Bug #1747080 changed: commissioning fails during 00-maas-01-lshw === frankban|afk is now known as frankban [10:12] how do you do network configuration on pods in maas? === ahasenac` is now known as ahasenack === ahasenack is now known as Guest7888 === Guest7888 is now known as ahasenack [13:06] cnf: there's no network configuration in pods [13:06] yet [15:47] hey folks; is there a way to force-resync my boot images? I just did a maas upgrade and any machines deployed are getting stuck on a boot: prompt [15:57] roaksoax: ok, thanks [16:04] Bug #1761530 opened: [2.4] Internal Server error has no logs in /var/log/maas/*.log [16:07] Karunamon: yeah you can go to the ui and force the sync [16:07] or under boot-resources IIRC === frankban is now known as frankban|afk [17:04] Bug #1761541 opened: [HA] Following pgsql failover MAAS gui is severely degraded Following pgsql failover MAAS gui is unavailable [18:21] hello, I'm trying to set up a home lab and am having trouble getting nodes detected [19:52] Bug #1761541 changed: [HA] Following pgsql failover MAAS gui is severely degraded Following pgsql failover MAAS gui is unavailable [20:07] muppet84: how are you having trouble getting nodes detected? [20:10] Bug #1761541 opened: [HA] Following pgsql failover MAAS gui is severely degraded Following pgsql failover MAAS gui is unavailable [20:13] Bug #1761541 changed: [HA] Following pgsql failover MAAS gui is severely degraded Following pgsql failover MAAS gui is unavailable [20:13] Bug #1761584 opened: Create virsh storage pool if one doesn't exist. [20:48] @roaksoax over pxe. It will begin to do the comissioning then fail and goto a ubuntu-enlist-node login. I was able to add a machine via the webgui and MAC address and get a second machine detected. [20:49] I thought I would just be able to PXE boot and it would configure the metal [20:49] Bug #1761600 opened: [2.4] Executing actions in the UI (e.g. deploying, commissioning) is too slow [20:49] Bug #1761601 opened: [2.4] Multiple region/rack controllers causes the UI to be very slow [21:10] Bug #1761600 changed: [2.4] Executing actions in the UI (e.g. deploying, commissioning) is too slow [21:10] Bug #1761601 changed: [2.4] Multiple region/rack controllers causes the UI to be very slow [21:13] Bug #1761600 opened: [2.4] Executing actions in the UI (e.g. deploying, commissioning) is too slow [21:13] Bug #1761601 opened: [2.4] Multiple region/rack controllers causes the UI to be very slow [22:55] 88 [22:57] Anyone created a bon with one of the interfaces being the provisioning interface? have 2x10Gb interfaces on server, need them in a bond supporting tagged VLANs. Creating bond doesn't seem to be an option, thought is because one of the interfaces is the provisioning interface.