/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2018/04/09/#ubuntu-release.txt

-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnucash (bionic-proposed/universe) [1:2.6.18-1 => 1:2.6.19-1] (no packageset) (sync)00:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-tweaks (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.28.0-1 => 3.28.1-1] (no packageset) (sync)00:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-tweaks [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.1-1]00:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnucash [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1:2.6.19-1]00:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: bubblewrap (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.2.0-4 => 0.2.1-1] (ubuntugnome) (sync)00:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: network-manager-pptp (bionic-proposed/main) [1.2.4-5build1 => 1.2.6-1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) (sync)00:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-shell-extension-autohidetopbar (bionic-proposed/universe) [20171126-1 => 20171126-2] (no packageset) (sync)00:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ruby-gnome2 (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.2.3-1 => 3.2.3-2] (no packageset) (sync)00:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-shell-extension-autohidetopbar [sync] (bionic-proposed) [20171126-2]00:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: spectre-meltdown-checker (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.35-1 => 0.36-1] (no packageset) (sync)00:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ruby-gnome2 [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.2.3-2]00:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: devhelp (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.0-1 => 3.28.1-1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) (sync)00:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted spectre-meltdown-checker [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.36-1]00:20
tsimonq2infinity, slangasek: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2018-April/004387.html <-- my proposal regarding getting rid of milestones, resulting from the discussion we had a few weeks ago.01:49
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ukui-panel (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.2-0ubuntu1 => 1.1.3-0ubuntu1] (ubuntukylin)02:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libbpp-popgen (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-1 => 2.4.0-2] (no packageset) (sync)02:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libbpp-popgen [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2]02:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libbpp-phyl-omics (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-1 => 2.4.0-2] (no packageset) (sync)02:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libbpp-raa (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.3.2-1 => 2.4.0-2] (no packageset) (sync)02:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libbpp-phyl-omics [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2]02:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libbpp-raa [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2]02:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-popgen [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-2] (no packageset)02:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-popgen [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-2] (no packageset)02:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-raa [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-2] (no packageset)02:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-raa [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-2] (no packageset)02:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-popgen [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-2] (no packageset)02:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-raa [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-2] (no packageset)02:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-popgen [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-2] (no packageset)02:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-raa [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-2] (no packageset)02:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-raa [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-2] (no packageset)02:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-popgen [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-2] (no packageset)02:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-raa [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-2] (no packageset)02:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-popgen [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-2] (no packageset)02:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-seq-omics [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-2] (no packageset)02:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-seq-omics [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-2] (no packageset)02:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-seq-omics [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-2] (no packageset)02:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-seq-omics [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-2] (no packageset)02:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-seq-omics [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-2] (no packageset)02:46
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-seq-omics [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-2] (no packageset)02:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: oslo-sphinx (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.18.0-0ubuntu1 => 4.18.0-2] (no packageset) (sync)03:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted oslo-sphinx [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.18.0-2]03:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntukylin-theme (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.7.5 => 1.7.6] (ubuntukylin)03:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ukui-settings-daemon (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.5-0ubuntu1 => 1.1.6-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)03:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ukwm (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.7-0ubuntu1 => 1.1.8-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)04:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ukui-media (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.1-0ubuntu1 => 1.1.2-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)04:20
flocculant!team | thoughts on https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2018-April/004387.html04:22
tsimonq2\o/04:23
flocculantwrong channel04:25
flocculantI'm not awake04:25
tsimonq2hehe04:25
tsimonq2¯\_(ツ)_/¯04:25
Bashing-omflocculant: Whatever you big boys decide to do .. I will do what I can to help .04:31
valoriebig boys!04:31
* valorie is not a boy in any sense of the word04:32
Bashing-omhehe - It's the role - that I play such a small boy part of :)04:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libtickit (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.2-2 => 0.2-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)05:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libtickit [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.2-2ubuntu1]05:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pam-wrapper (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0.2-1 => 1.0.6-1] (no packageset) (sync)05:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pam-wrapper [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.6-1]05:41
cpaelzerHi, anybody of the release team around that could consider FFE-ack'ing bug 1762315 ?06:00
ubot5`bug 1762315 in qemu (Ubuntu) "slirp: Add domainname option to slirp's DHCP server" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/176231506:00
cpaelzerAnother bug that would be great to have FFE exception soon would be bug 176189906:14
ubot5`bug 1761899 in nginx (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Please merge with 1.13.10-1 from Debian unstable" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/176189906:14
cpaelzergood morning sil210006:15
cpaelzerseeing you join, might I hijack you for an FFE-view on 1761899 and 1762315 ?06:15
sil2100Morning!06:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pocl (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0-2ubuntu1 => 1.1-4] (no packageset) (sync)06:17
sil2100cpaelzer: let me take a look in 5 minutes06:18
cpaelzerthanks, in case of questions let me know06:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pocl [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.1-4]06:18
cpaelzersil2100: I'm dropping my daughter at kindergarden now, but really if there is anything while reviewing those bugs for FFE I'll be here with you again shortly06:38
sil2100cpaelzer: did you do a test build of the new version?06:45
sil2100cpaelzer: of nginx06:45
cpaelzersil2100: we did on the MP06:59
cpaelzersil2100: let me get you a linkg06:59
cpaelzersil2100: https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/3228/+packages06:59
cpaelzersil2100: from my MP review https://code.launchpad.net/~nacc/ubuntu/+source/nginx/+git/nginx/+merge/342762/comments/89590806:59
sil2100cpaelzer: thanks!07:14
sil2100Yeah, didn't look at the MP, maybe I should have ;)07:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libtickit (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.2-2ubuntu1 => 0.2-2ubuntu2] (no packageset)07:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libtickit [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.2-2ubuntu2]07:15
jamespagedoko: next cycle07:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libtickit [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.2-2ubuntu2] (no packageset)07:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libtickit [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.2-2ubuntu2] (no packageset)07:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libtickit [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.2-2ubuntu2] (no packageset)07:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libtickit [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.2-2ubuntu2] (no packageset)07:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libtickit [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.2-2ubuntu2] (no packageset)07:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: starjava-topcat (bionic-proposed/primary) [4.5.1-1]07:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libtickit [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.2-2ubuntu2] (no packageset)07:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libtickit [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [0.2-2ubuntu2]07:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libtickit [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [0.2-2ubuntu2]07:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libtickit [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [0.2-2ubuntu2]07:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected starjava-topcat [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.5.1-1]07:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libtickit [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [0.2-2ubuntu2]07:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libtickit [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [0.2-2ubuntu2]07:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libtickit [i386] (bionic-proposed) [0.2-2ubuntu2]07:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-seq-omics [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-1]07:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-seq-omics [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2]07:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-seq-omics [i386] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2]07:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-seq-omics [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2]07:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-seq-omics [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2]07:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-seq-omics [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2]07:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-popgen [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-1]07:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-popgen [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2]07:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-popgen [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2]07:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-popgen [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2]07:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-popgen [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2]07:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-popgen [i386] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2]07:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-popgen [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2]07:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-raa [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2]07:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-raa [i386] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2]07:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-raa [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2]07:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-seq-omics [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2]07:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-raa [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2]07:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-raa [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2]07:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-raa [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2]07:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-seq-omics [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-1]07:27
sil2100cpaelzer: ok, both approved07:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: httping (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.5-1build1 => 2.5-1.1] (no packageset) (sync)07:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted httping [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.5-1.1]07:30
cpaelzerthank you so much sil210007:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: buildbot (bionic-proposed/primary) [1.1.1-1]07:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-8 (bionic-proposed/main) [8-20180406-0ubuntu1 => 8-20180408-0ubuntu1] (core) (sync)07:40
slangasekandyrock: hi, thanks for the branch on software-properties.  Are you confident that moving the deps is not going to leave any runtime failures on systems that have software-properties-common / python3-software-properties installed but not software-properties-gtk?07:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted buildbot [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.1-1]07:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-8 [sync] (bionic-proposed) [8-20180408-0ubuntu1]07:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: buildbot [amd64] (bionic-proposed/none) [1.1.1-1] (no packageset)07:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted matplotlib [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.1.1-2ubuntu3]07:46
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted buildbot [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.1-1]07:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libgoogle-gson-java (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4-2 => 2.8.2-1] (no packageset) (sync)07:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libgoogle-gson-java [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.8.2-1]07:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: bppphyview (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.5.1-1 => 0.5.1-1build1] (no packageset)08:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libbpp-phyl (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.3.2-2 => 2.3.2-2build1] (no packageset)08:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: bppsuite (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.3.2-1 => 2.3.2-1build1] (no packageset)08:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libbpp-qt (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.3.2-1 => 2.3.2-1build1] (no packageset)08:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted bppphyview [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.5.1-1build1]08:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libbpp-phyl [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.3.2-2build1]08:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted bppsuite [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.3.2-1build1]08:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libbpp-qt [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.3.2-1build1]08:01
Laneyslangasek: don't know, sorry, I didn't chase it down08:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: maffilter (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.2.1+dfsg-1build1 => 1.2.1+dfsg-1build2] (no packageset)08:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: physamp (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0.3-1 => 1.0.3-1build1] (no packageset)08:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: maven-javadoc-plugin (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.0.0-3 => 3.0.0-3] (no packageset)08:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted maven-javadoc-plugin [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.0.0-3]08:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted physamp [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.3-1build1]08:03
Laneyoh, you found it, ok08:03
=== JerryKao is now known as Jerry-Bluefin
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted maffilter [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.1+dfsg-1build2]08:04
Laneyslangasek: ah, cdimage, no I guess mid-air collision08:05
Laneyslangasek: I checked http://releases.ubuntu.com/artful/ before updating and it said .1 already08:07
slangasekah, well then :)08:07
Laneyoh, you're here, hi08:08
* Laney expected replies in many hours :P08:08
slangasek:)08:09
Laney67 emails @ubuntu.com08:11
Laneyguess IS haven't deleted that stuck instance yet ...08:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: maven-javadoc-plugin (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.0.0-3 => 3.0.0-4] (no packageset)08:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted maven-javadoc-plugin [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.0.0-4]08:13
jbichaslangasek: you're probably better off uploading the remaining bpp packages from the Debian git repos to get the 2.4 versions08:16
slangasekjbicha: that sounds like work.  I was just attempting no-change rebuilds because I saw the transition was started (why?)08:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: vala (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.40.2-1 => 0.40.3-1] (ubuntu-desktop) (sync)08:17
jbichathe whole bpp thing is a mess, hopefully it's getting a bit better, Debian bug 89040008:18
ubot5`Debian bug 890400 in libbpp-core3 "libbpp-core3: ABI change without soname chenge" [Serious,Fixed] http://bugs.debian.org/89040008:18
slangasekhmm but you synced the new upstream version rather than merging just a fix to debian/control?08:19
jbichaI think the fix was the new upstream series08:20
jbichalibbpp-core 2.3.2-1 was already stuck in bionic-proposed before I synced the 2.4 series08:22
slangasekok08:22
slangasekotoh wasn't it stuck because the autopkgtests were broken, because the revdeps needed a rebuild?08:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: golang-go-dbus (bionic-proposed/universe) [1~bzr20150203-0ubuntu1 => 1~bzr20150203-0ubuntu2] (no packageset)08:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted golang-go-dbus [source] (bionic-proposed) [1~bzr20150203-0ubuntu2]08:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: moonshot-trust-router (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.4.1-1build1 => 1.4.1-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)08:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted moonshot-trust-router [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.4.1-1ubuntu1]08:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: globus-gridftp-server (bionic-proposed/universe) [12.4-1build1 => 12.5-1] (no packageset) (sync)08:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted globus-gridftp-server [sync] (bionic-proposed) [12.5-1]08:36
dokoslangasek: what is the regression in http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/r/ruby-fakeweb/bionic/armhf ?08:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nginx (bionic-proposed/main) [1.13.6-2ubuntu2 => 1.13.10-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server)08:40
slangasekdoko: 1.3.0+git20131202.48208f9+dfsg-3 is badtested; if it's the same failure we should probably update the hint version?08:41
dokoslangasek: asking because the only passing test doesn''t have a log08:42
slangasekdoko: ah. that's because wrong links are generated from logs of tests that were run during a previous release08:43
dokoold run: 88 runs, 207 assertions, 20 failures, 54 errors, 0 skips08:43
dokonew run: 192 tests, 296 assertions, 11 failures, 0 errors, 0 pendings, 0 omissions, 0 notifications08:44
slangasekyeah, the new package is much closer to passing. I'll hint it.08:44
acheronukslangasek: I'm just seeing what changes I can pull from kio-extras in debian, given that they are behind us in version. then I will test build what I get08:53
dokoslangasek: mvo claims a strange systemd setup to be the cause of the snapd autopkg test failure (on #snappy)08:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kio-extras (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:17.12.3-0ubuntu1 => 4:17.12.3-0ubuntu2] (kubuntu)09:18
sil2100doko: could you point me to the snapd failure if you have it handy?09:24
dokosil2100: http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/s/snapd/bionic/i38609:25
doko<mvo> doko: I doubt its a real issue, this works fine in our GCE environment, we see close to 100% success there (sometimes network related failures). I will check with Laney.09:26
doko<mvo> doko, Laney an interessting observation is that they all (the recent ones) die in "+ journalctl --sync\n\n<kill-timeout reached>". makes me wonder if something is wrong with the systemd setup on these instance09:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mosquitto (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.4.15-1 => 1.4.15-2] (no packageset) (sync)09:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mosquitto [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.4.15-2]09:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gdb (bionic-proposed/main) [8.1-0ubuntu2 => 8.1-0ubuntu3] (core)09:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gdb [source] (bionic-proposed) [8.1-0ubuntu3]10:00
Laneyanyone have any particular opinion on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libzip/+bug/1674057 ?10:14
ubot5`Ubuntu bug 1674057 in libzip (Ubuntu) "[FFe] upgrade libzip to version 1.5.0" [Wishlist,New]10:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: binutils (bionic-proposed/main) [2.30-14ubuntu2 => 2.30-15ubuntu1] (core)10:18
dokoLaney: given that we have a two year old version in the archive ... why not?10:23
Laneybecause the new version might have bugs, it's late in the cycle, and it's a transition10:25
darkxstLaney, it also switches to proven SSL code10:29
darkxstupstream have been very responsive in my dealings with them10:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted binutils [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.30-15ubuntu1]10:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted synfig [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.1-0ubuntu4]10:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nginx [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.13.10-1ubuntu1]10:30
Laneydarkxst: yes I know, I'm asking what people thing, not judging10:31
Laneythink10:31
Laneydoko asked "why not?" and I answered that question10:32
darkxstok10:34
acheronukLaney: would be nice for better zip support in ark, but I we have been building using libarchive for a few releases now and have had no real screams of anguish from users10:40
acheronuk*but we10:40
LocutusOfBorgtjaalton, jbicha did you break somewhere virtualbox on guest for bionic? https://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/1762310:50
LocutusOfBorgI see "Apr  7 09:00:35 bionic org.gnome.Shell.desktop[1214]: /usr/bin/gnome-shell: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libmutter-2.so.0: undefined symbol: glFramebufferTexture2D"10:50
darkxstLocutusOfBorg, I think there is an upstream bug for that somewhere10:51
Laneydarkxst: probably grabbing a silo and uploading everything into that would be good10:51
tjaaltonLocutusOfBorg: I admit nothing :)10:51
LocutusOfBorgI hope somebody will fix that soon, at least before release :/10:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sssd (bionic-proposed/main) [1.16.0-5ubuntu2 => 1.16.1-1ubuntu1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)10:54
darkxstLaney, sure, will do, what was the link to the CI-train again?10:57
darkxstnot used it in a while ;)10:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: vagrant-lxc (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.2.1-3ubuntu1 => 1.4.0-1] (ubuntu-cloud) (sync)11:00
apwLaney, as it is removing a non-standard crypto implentation that sounds like a fair plus to me11:03
apwdarkxst, did i suggest you asked rat-liff about this?  did that happen?  this was on the assumption they might be strongly +1 on that basis11:03
Laneydarkxst: bileto.u.c11:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted language-selector [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.187]11:06
darkxstapw, I think you might have mentioned it and i didnt follow up on that11:15
darkxstratliff, can you take a look at bug 167405711:17
ubot5`bug 1674057 in libzip (Ubuntu) "[FFe] upgrade libzip to version 1.5.0" [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/167405711:17
Laneyit's not actually in main tho11:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: base-files (bionic-proposed/main) [10ubuntu1 => 10.1ubuntu1] (core)11:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: yard (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.9.12-1ubuntu3 => 0.9.12-2] (no packageset) (sync)11:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted yard [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.9.12-2]11:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted vagrant-lxc [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.4.0-1]11:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-notifier (bionic-proposed/main) [3.189 => 3.190] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)11:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pam [source] (artful-proposed) [1.1.8-3.2ubuntu3.1]11:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pam [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.1.8-3.2ubuntu2.1]11:42
jbichaLocutusOfBorg: I use VirtualBox all the time, bionic guest on bionic host still works fine here11:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: usb-creator (bionic-proposed/main) [0.3.4 => 0.3.5] (ubuntu-desktop)11:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ibus [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.5.11-1ubuntu3~xenial1]11:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ibus (xenial-proposed/main) [1.5.11-1ubuntu2 => 1.5.11-1ubuntu2.1] (input-methods, kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)11:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-system-service (bionic-proposed/main) [0.3 => 0.3.1] (ubuntu-desktop)11:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-system-service [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.3.1]11:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted usb-creator [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.3.5]11:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted update-notifier [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.190]11:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ibus [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.5.11-1ubuntu2.1]11:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1004.4] (kernel)11:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1004.4]12:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: buildbot (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.1-1 => 1.1.1-2] (no packageset)12:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted buildbot [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.1-2]12:14
LocutusOfBorgthanks jbicha, maybe some not so common configuration12:19
jbichamaybe different version of virtualbox or guest drivers?12:20
LocutusOfBorghttps://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virtualbox/+question/66563612:20
LocutusOfBorgthis refers to something old12:21
LocutusOfBorgbut quoting vbox-dev irc channel "Hi, if I enable 3D in ubuntu 18.04 guest (on macos 10.13 host), I get the following error on bootup so that the login screen doesn't appear, just a black screen."12:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libtemplate-perl (bionic-proposed/main) [2.24-1.2build5 => 2.27-1] (ubuntu-desktop) (sync)12:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qemu (bionic-proposed/main) [1:2.11+dfsg-1ubuntu5 => 1:2.11+dfsg-1ubuntu6] (ubuntu-server, virt)12:39
cpaelzerHi Release Team - for quite a few days I was collecting and testing qemu fixes.12:39
cpaelzerIt is now in Bionic unapproved and I wanted to ask to accept this soon if that would not crash with the image building12:40
cpaelzerSee https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/bionic/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=qemu12:40
cpaelzerThe reason I poll more than the usual "waitin until you get to it" is that one of the fixes should really not be a day-0 SRU but in-release pocket12:41
cpaelzertherefore and since murphy is an idiot surely hitting something on dep8 test or so I'd ask to check and accept it soon12:41
cpaelzerI'll poll later again if no one found the time12:41
cpaelzerthanks in advance12:41
cpaelzerTL;DR - @release team - please accept new qemu into bionic-proposed12:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected qemu [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:2.5+dfsg-5ubuntu10.25]12:43
cpaelzerthank for x-proposed as well, but I assume that was the SRU Team12:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dtv-scan-tables [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0+git20171226.07b18ec-1]12:47
cpaelzerso should I ask for x-proposed to get b- ? :-)12:47
Laneythe queue's not that big; I should think qemu will get progressed quite soon12:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted partman-lvm [sync] (bionic-proposed) [123]12:48
cpaelzersil2100: I think your reject only send me the first line12:52
cpaelzersil2100: but that means the essential part is missing12:52
cpaelzereven in the mail I only got "What is the reason that the previous security update"12:52
cpaelzerI assume something followed that half sentence that I could address, but ?12:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted yorick [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.2.04+dfsg1-9]12:53
cpaelzerthe former security update is released =.24 and my upload did not revert or skip the former sec update (it is quite normal a.25 on top of .24)12:54
cpaelzersil2100: so please let me know what the reason was here, so that I can address your needs12:54
apwcpaelzer, did you look in the bug, as if it was rejected by the review tools i believe it puts that in the bug too12:57
cpaelzerapw: I found it - sil2100 realized it was cut and posted the full text in the bug12:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted bubblewrap [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.2.1-1]12:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libtemplate-perl [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.27-1]12:59
sil2100cpaelzer: yeah, sorry about it, finger-error13:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted network-manager-pptp [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.6-1]13:02
cpaelzersil2100: I foudn it in the bug, but I don't follow13:03
cpaelzersil2100: .24 to .25 is13:03
cpaelzer changelog                                              |   1213:03
cpaelzer patches/series                                         |    213:03
cpaelzer patches/ubuntu/lp-1723904-sprs-backport.patch          |  634 +++++++++++++++++13:03
cpaelzer patches/ubuntu/lp-1723914-ppc64-set-msr-register.patch |   38 +13:03
cpaelzer 4 files changed, 686 insertions(+)13:03
cpaelzerthat is the two bugs for the SRU 1 patch each and 1 line in d/p/series13:03
cpaelzer+ changelog13:03
cpaelzernothing else13:03
sil2100So the debdiff that was generated by LP was removing the two CVE patches and commenting them out in the debian/patches/series file13:03
sil2100Let me fetch the package and see if that's really how it looked in the package13:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted devhelp [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.1-1]13:04
cpaelzersil2100: yeah please, if anything is odd by me I want to learn what it was13:04
cpaelzersil2100: and if not lets sort it out and I can requeue for your ack instead then13:04
cpaelzersil2100: IMHO it should be https://git.launchpad.net/~paelzer/ubuntu/+source/qemu/log/?h=ubuntu/xenial-devel13:06
sil2100cpaelzer: just so you know what I was talking about, the debdiff from LP: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/363323677/qemu_1%3A2.5+dfsg-5ubuntu10.23_1%3A2.5+dfsg-5ubuntu10.25.diff.gz13:06
* cpaelzer is reading13:06
sil2100cpaelzer: if you check debian/patches/series, you'll see something strange happened13:06
* sil2100 downloads the source13:06
cpaelzersil2100: this is a debdiff against the -2 version13:06
cpaelzersil2100: .23 never existed in real life13:07
cpaelzersil2100: .22 was a security update13:07
cpaelzer.23 was a security update13:07
cpaelzerwe found a bug in .23 while in proposed13:07
sil2100Ok, I think I know what's up13:07
cpaelzer.24 fixes that up13:07
cpaelzer.24 is what is released now13:08
sil2100cpaelzer: could you re-upload?13:08
cpaelzersure, just a sec13:08
sil2100Actually I can just re-upload it now13:08
cpaelzeras you prefer13:08
cpaelzerI have the cmdline ready13:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rsyslog (bionic-proposed/main) [8.32.0-1ubuntu1 => 8.32.0-1ubuntu2] (core)13:09
cpaelzeryou just stopped me hitting enter13:09
sil2100Ok, so you had it handy too, please proceed!13:09
cpaelzeruploaded13:09
cpaelzersil2100: and now showing up int the queue again for me13:10
cpaelzerwarning - the diff LP creates is again against .23 (for whatever reason)13:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qemu (xenial-proposed/main) [1:2.5+dfsg-5ubuntu10.24 => 1:2.5+dfsg-5ubuntu10.25] (ubuntu-server, virt)13:10
apwnow that would explain a lot ...13:10
cpaelzerand with .23 never existing it is quite reasonable that this diff made the least sense13:11
* cpaelzer is double checking his changes file and rmadison13:11
cpaelzerno .24 is really the oen listed everywhere https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/xenial/+source/qemu13:12
sil2100That's all good, the mistake here was on my part - I read the changes wrongly13:12
cpaelzerok, thanks for sorting it out with me so quickly13:12
sil2100I read it in reverse13:13
cpaelzerto finish this as FYI .23 never made it further than -proposed13:13
sil2100Yeah, this I know, I checked the bug and the package itself, this part was clear13:13
sil2100What I though happened was that the security regression update got reverted, but in fact no, it was just appearing in the diff as expected13:14
cpaelzerok13:14
cpaelzerAnd since this was way too much text in here I feel obliged to ask again @Release team to ack qemu currently in bionic-unapproved :-)13:15
sil2100cpaelzer: I can take care of that too ;p13:15
cpaelzerI'm here in case this one looks odd as well :-)13:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: groovy (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.14-1 => 2.4.15-1] (no packageset) (sync)13:16
cpaelzerTL;DR changes in there that are not allowed as 0-day-SRU but have to be on -release pocket13:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted groovy [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.15-1]13:16
sil2100cpaelzer: not a blocker I think, but is it common for changelog entries to have links to private bugs?13:19
sil2100cpaelzer: since LP: #1704312 seems to be privateish13:19
ubot5`Error: Launchpad bug 1704312 could not be found13:19
sil2100I have access, but I guess other people might get sad ;)13:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qemu [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:2.5+dfsg-5ubuntu10.25]13:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: 183 entries have been added or removed13:25
cpaelzersil2100: it is not yet opened, but eventually will no more be provate13:25
cpaelzersil2100: private13:25
sil2100ACK ;)13:25
cpaelzersil2100: and yes, I even link to those (even if they stay private)13:26
* cpaelzer looks for a policy on this to adapt ...13:26
cpaelzerthis was opened when the feature was still secret - therefore the private on this particular case13:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qemu [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:2.11+dfsg-1ubuntu6]13:27
sil2100I just don't really know myself, I would expect all bugs mentioned in public uploads to be public, but as said I don't consider that a blocker as I don't really know if there's any policy for that13:46
sil2100At least not for devel, for SRUs they have to be public13:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rsyslog (bionic-proposed/main) [8.32.0-1ubuntu1 => 8.32.0-1ubuntu3] (core)13:49
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntukylin-theme [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.7.6]13:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ukui-panel [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.3-0ubuntu1]13:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ukwm [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.8-0ubuntu1]13:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ukui-media [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.2-0ubuntu1]13:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ukui-settings-daemon [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.6-0ubuntu1]13:50
acheronuksil2100: will that packagset update show soon, or not until tomorrow?13:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apt (trusty-proposed/main) [1.0.1ubuntu2.17 => 1.0.1ubuntu2.18] (core)14:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted vala [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.40.3-1]14:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: networkd-dispatcher (bionic-proposed/primary) [1.7-0ubuntu1]14:06
acheronuksil2100: ok. seems I can upload things I wanted now even through the online list has not update yet. thanks :)14:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mm-common (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.9.11-2 => 0.9.12-1] (no packageset) (sync)14:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mm-common [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.9.12-1]14:10
sil2100acheronuk: yeah, it doesn't refresh super often14:27
sil2100acheronuk: ok, good! yw14:27
Laneyacheronuk: you can use edit-acl from lp:ubuntu-archive-tools to query that in realtime14:28
acheronukLaney: cheers. handy to know :)14:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zfs-linux (bionic-proposed/main) [0.7.5-1ubuntu13 => 0.7.5-1ubuntu14] (core)14:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted zfs-linux [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.7.5-1ubuntu14]14:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-meta (bionic-proposed/main) [1.414 => 1.415] (core)14:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted networkd-dispatcher [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.7-0ubuntu1]15:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pluma (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.20.1-0ubuntu1 => 1.20.1-2ubuntu1] (ubuntu-mate, ubuntukylin)15:04
dokoLaney: do armhf autopkg testers need some attention?15:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: networkd-dispatcher [amd64] (bionic-proposed/none) [1.7-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)15:12
Laneypossibly15:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted networkd-dispatcher [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [1.7-0ubuntu1]15:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kdelibs4support (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.44.0-0ubuntu1 => 5.44.0-0ubuntu2] (kubuntu)15:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: cxlflash (bionic-proposed/primary) [5.0.2669-0ubuntu1]15:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-session (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.0-0ubuntu3 => 3.28.0-0ubuntu4] (ubuntu-desktop)15:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: poppler (bionic-proposed/main) [0.62.0-1ubuntu1 => 0.62.0-2ubuntu1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)16:13
=== nacc_ is now known as nacc
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pkgbinarymangler (bionic-proposed/main) [135 => 136] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)16:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox (bionic-proposed/multiverse) [5.2.8-dfsg-5 => 5.2.8-dfsg-6] (ubuntu-cloud) (sync)16:46
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libcommons-compress-java (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.13-1 => 1.13-2] (no packageset) (sync)16:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libcommons-compress-java [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.13-2]16:58
dokostgraber, slangasek: please update the hint for vagrant-lxc. same failure as before17:05
stgraberdoko: no idea who maintains this thing but it's not something the LXC/LXD team cares about or supports in any way. I'm on vacation this week so if I have any spare time to look at it it'd be next week17:09
slangasekjbicha: is one of these versions of yorick going to fix the autopkgtests and not require hinting?17:09
dokostgraber: you spend more time typing that than fixing it and just replying "ok". but maybe you're typing as fast as you are speaking ;p17:10
stgraberdoko: well, I have no idea what that package is or what it does, so I don't think it'd be something I can fix in 30s :)17:13
stgraberdoko: unless you consider me running remove-package as a fix :)17:13
slangasekdoko: hint updated17:14
slangasekstgraber: this was a release-team-oriented request, perhaps he misread tumbleweed's file as yours, no implication of package ownership17:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kubuntu-settings (bionic-proposed/universe) [1:18.04ubuntu10 => 1:18.04ubuntu11] (kubuntu)17:29
acheronukslangasek: if you have time, could you perhaps take a look at LP: #176247917:31
ubot5`Launchpad bug 1762479 in kdeconnect (Ubuntu Bionic) "[FFe] KdeConnect 1.3.0 for Bionic" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/176247917:31
acheronukthanks17:31
slangasekacheronuk: FFe approved.  Historically, flavors were allowed latitude in self-managing FFes for packages that were core parts of their image and that only they had seeded; perhaps we should discuss (but not just at this moment) getting back to that state, so that we don't need to be a bottleneck for you17:36
acheronukslangasek: oh, I did not realise that. I know when kubuntu had core devs, release team, and AAs on the team, things obviously went quicker, but what you say makes sense17:37
dokoxnox: I'm going to reject cxlflash17:39
slangasekacheronuk: it was instigated at a time when that was true, but not implicitly tied to the flavor leads having those roles17:39
acheronukcase in point, I may have another one for kstars later, if I can get the devs to give up a human readable changelog17:39
dokoxnox: src/build/install/resources/license/* looks like it's non-free. or do you want to have that in multiverse?17:39
acheronukright. I see. lets discuss that for next time around (18.10) then17:40
slangasekdoko: why are you directing that comment to xnox? wasn't sil2100 working on cxlflash?17:41
dokoahh, ok17:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected cxlflash [source] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.2669-0ubuntu1]17:43
dokoand email him about it17:46
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kdeconnect (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.2.1-0ubuntu2 => 1.3.0-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)17:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pylint-django (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.9.0-2 => 0.9.4-1] (no packageset) (sync)17:53
dokoginggs: could you have a look at pandas? ftbfs on arm64 and s390x17:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pylint-django [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.9.4-1]17:54
ginggsdoko: is removing 0.22.0-2 from proposed and uploading 0.20.3-11 (which seemed to build everywhere) an option?18:00
slangasekginggs: 0.20.3-11 was previously in -proposed and at the time it ftbfs everywhere in Ubuntu; would that no longer be the case? https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pandas/0.20.3-1118:02
ginggstesting it my PPA now... but just wanted to know if that was an option18:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: maxima (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.41.0-2 => 5.41.0-3] (no packageset) (sync)18:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted maxima [sync] (bionic-proposed) [5.41.0-3]18:09
dokoslangasek: your python-cdo change isn't forwarded to debian18:12
slangasekdoko: ok18:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pylint (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.8.1-1 => 1.8.3-1] (no packageset) (sync)18:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pylint [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.8.3-1]18:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pkgbinarymangler [source] (bionic-proposed) [136]18:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pyserial (bionic-proposed/main) [3.4-1 => 3.4-2] (edubuntu, kubuntu, ubuntu-server) (sync)18:46
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: elfutils (bionic-proposed/main) [0.170-0.3 => 0.170-0.4] (core) (sync)18:46
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted elfutils [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.170-0.4]18:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pyserial [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.4-2]18:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: etl (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.2.1-0ubuntu1 => 1.2.1-0.1] (no packageset) (sync)18:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted etl [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.1-0.1]18:57
ginggsit looks like pandas 0.20.3-11 is still going to FTBFS everywhere :( I will have a look at 0.22.0-2 tomorrow19:07
jbichaslangasek: no idea about yorick, maybe :|19:29
dokoslangasek: please badtest ruby-pkg-config/1.2.9-1. the autopkg test fails because it has some -I include flags twice. no idea how to fix that. but that's something which doesn't hurt19:39
jbichaok, I see that the new yorick version didn't pass its Ubuntu autopkgtests either :(19:44
slangasekjbicha: this was my point, yes :)19:50
slangasekdoko: looking19:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: software-properties (bionic-proposed/main) [0.96.24.26 => 0.96.24.27] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)19:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cups (bionic-proposed/main) [2.2.7-1ubuntu1 => 2.2.7-1ubuntu2] (core)19:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kio-extras [source] (bionic-proposed) [4:17.12.3-0ubuntu2]19:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rsyslog [source] (bionic-proposed) [8.32.0-1ubuntu2]19:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rsyslog [source] (bionic-proposed) [8.32.0-1ubuntu3]19:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-7-cross (bionic-proposed/main) [20ubuntu1 => 20ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop) (sync)20:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-oslo.versionedobjects (artful-proposed/main) [1.26.0-0ubuntu1 => 1.26.0-0ubuntu2] (kubuntu, openstack, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)20:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-oslo.versionedobjects (bionic-proposed/main) [1.31.2-0ubuntu1 => 1.31.2-0ubuntu2] (kubuntu, openstack, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)20:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: buildbot (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.1-2 => 1.1.1-3] (no packageset)20:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted buildbot [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.1-3]20:18
infinitytsimonq2: Looks like you got a bunch of concensus before posting.  Excellent.20:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-7-cross [sync] (bionic-proposed) [20ubuntu2]20:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-oslo.versionedobjects [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.31.2-0ubuntu2]20:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-oslo.versionedobjects (xenial-proposed/main) [1.8.0-1 => 1.8.0-1ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server)20:26
flocculantinfinity: did you notice my ping re the additional software tool leaving conf file behind when removing nvidia? bug 176159320:28
ubot5`bug 1761593 in software-properties (Ubuntu) "Uninstall left nouveau blacklisted" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/176159320:28
flocculantthought that it might be prudent to flag that20:28
tsimonq2infinity: I did, yeahp20:32
infinityflocculant: I'm not sure reassigning that from nvidia-graphics to software-properties makes sense.20:33
infinityflocculant: If a package's unpurged conffiles cause the system to misbehave, the package is at fault, not the user who removed instead of purging.20:33
flocculantok - made sense to me at the time20:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted base-files [source] (bionic-proposed) [10.1ubuntu1]20:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-meta [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.415]20:36
flocculantbut I had just installed/reinstalled a bunch of times in different methods - so possibly losing the plot a bit ;)20:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox [sync] (bionic-proposed) [5.2.8-dfsg-6]20:36
flocculantregardless of which package - I thought I'd best let someone in here know about it20:37
tsimonq2slangasek: You hit the nail on the head with what I was insinuating wrt the whole "let's improve our automated testing" part of the email.20:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ruby-gnome2 (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.2.3-2 => 3.2.4-1] (no packageset) (sync)20:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-boxes (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.27.92-1 => 3.28.1-1] (desktop-extra) (sync)20:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ruby-gnome2 [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.2.4-1]20:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: aseba (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.6.0-2 => 1.6.0-3] (no packageset) (sync)20:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted aseba [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.6.0-3]20:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sblim-sfcb (bionic-proposed/multiverse) [1.4.9-0ubuntu3 => 1.4.9-0ubuntu4] (no packageset)20:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: partman-md (bionic-proposed/main) [85 => 86] (core) (sync)20:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sblim-sfcb [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.4.9-0ubuntu4]20:43
flocculantinfinity: also I guess I didn't look deeply enough at what happened in 17.10 there - I just checked what softwre-properties did there - and it removed the conf file20:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: appstream-glib (xenial-proposed/main) [0.5.13-1ubuntu5 => 0.5.13-1ubuntu6] (desktop-core)21:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sblim-sfcb (bionic-proposed/multiverse) [1.4.9-0ubuntu3 => 1.4.9-0ubuntu5] (no packageset)21:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sblim-sfcb [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.4.9-0ubuntu5]21:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sssd [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.16.1-1ubuntu1]21:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: budgie-desktop-environment (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.9.7 => 0.9.8] (personal-fossfreedom, ubuntu-budgie)21:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: budgie-extras (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.4.3-0ubuntu1 => 0.4.4-0ubuntu1] (personal-fossfreedom, ubuntu-budgie)21:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ruby-gollum-lib (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.2.1+debian-1 => 4.2.7-1] (no packageset) (sync)21:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ruby-gollum-lib [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.2.7-1]21:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: hyphen-ru (bionic-proposed/main) [20030310-1ubuntu2 => 20030310-1ubuntu3] (personal-gunnarhj, ubuntu-desktop)21:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: myspell-hr (bionic-proposed/main) [20060617-2.4 => 20060617-2.4ubuntu1] (personal-gunnarhj, ubuntu-desktop)22:08
dokothis is fun, even gsl and maxima transitioned now \o/22:17
slangasekdoko: reran ruby-pkg-config autopkgtest against release pocket and confirmed it's broken there also; hint added22:22
dokonow that's ruby-concurrent left on armhf ...22:23
slangasekwhy oh why did someone make redis build on i38622:27
nacclol22:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pluma [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.20.1-2ubuntu1]22:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted software-properties [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.96.24.27]22:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ruby-delayed-job (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.0.6-2ubuntu1 => 4.1.4-1] (no packageset) (sync)22:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ruby-delayed-job [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.1.4-1]22:43
tsimonq2infinity: Was any progress made on that Ubiquity bug?22:47
infinitytsimonq2: Steve has an MP that I need to revisit because over the weekend, I had a thought that maybe the fix was correct, but the placement was not.  And need to verify that.22:48
infinityAlso, "correct", in that I still don't understand *why* this is happening, and *why* it's only on lubuntu.22:48
tsimonq2OK.22:48
infinityWhich annoys me.22:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: jellyfish (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.2.8-3 => 2.2.8-3] (no packageset) (sync)23:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted jellyfish [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.2.8-3]23:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pdbg (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0-1 => 1.0-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)23:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pdbg [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.0-1ubuntu1]23:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pdbg [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)23:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: unity (bionic-proposed/universe) [7.5.0+18.04.20180404-0ubuntu2 => 7.5.0+18.04.20180409-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) (sync)23:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted unity [sync] (bionic-proposed) [7.5.0+18.04.20180409-0ubuntu1]23:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-getting-started-docs (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.0+git20180331-0ubuntu1 => 3.28.1-0ubuntu1] (personal-gunnarhj, ubuntu-desktop)23:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nautic (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.5-3 => 1.5-4] (no packageset) (sync)23:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nautic [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.5-4]23:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libwx-scintilla-perl (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.39-3build2 => 0.39-4] (no packageset) (sync)23:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libwx-scintilla-perl [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.39-4]23:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-user-docs (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.0+git20180331-0ubuntu1 => 3.28.1-0ubuntu1] (personal-gunnarhj, ubuntu-desktop)23:53
slangasekdoko: I'm not sure, but I think the tpm2-tss armhf FTBFS may be a toolchain bug; trying to step through with gdb, and test/unit/tcti-device.c:164 is never executed23:55

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!