-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnucash (bionic-proposed/universe) [1:2.6.18-1 => 1:2.6.19-1] (no packageset) (sync) | 00:16 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-tweaks (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.28.0-1 => 3.28.1-1] (no packageset) (sync) | 00:17 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-tweaks [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.1-1] | 00:17 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnucash [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1:2.6.19-1] | 00:17 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: bubblewrap (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.2.0-4 => 0.2.1-1] (ubuntugnome) (sync) | 00:18 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: network-manager-pptp (bionic-proposed/main) [1.2.4-5build1 => 1.2.6-1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) (sync) | 00:18 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-shell-extension-autohidetopbar (bionic-proposed/universe) [20171126-1 => 20171126-2] (no packageset) (sync) | 00:19 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ruby-gnome2 (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.2.3-1 => 3.2.3-2] (no packageset) (sync) | 00:19 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-shell-extension-autohidetopbar [sync] (bionic-proposed) [20171126-2] | 00:19 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: spectre-meltdown-checker (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.35-1 => 0.36-1] (no packageset) (sync) | 00:19 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ruby-gnome2 [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.2.3-2] | 00:19 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: devhelp (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.0-1 => 3.28.1-1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) (sync) | 00:20 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted spectre-meltdown-checker [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.36-1] | 00:20 | |
tsimonq2 | infinity, slangasek: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2018-April/004387.html <-- my proposal regarding getting rid of milestones, resulting from the discussion we had a few weeks ago. | 01:49 |
---|---|---|
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ukui-panel (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.2-0ubuntu1 => 1.1.3-0ubuntu1] (ubuntukylin) | 02:33 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libbpp-popgen (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-1 => 2.4.0-2] (no packageset) (sync) | 02:35 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libbpp-popgen [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2] | 02:35 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libbpp-phyl-omics (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-1 => 2.4.0-2] (no packageset) (sync) | 02:35 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libbpp-raa (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.3.2-1 => 2.4.0-2] (no packageset) (sync) | 02:36 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libbpp-phyl-omics [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2] | 02:36 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libbpp-raa [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2] | 02:36 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-popgen [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-2] (no packageset) | 02:38 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-popgen [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-2] (no packageset) | 02:38 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-raa [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-2] (no packageset) | 02:39 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-raa [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-2] (no packageset) | 02:39 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-popgen [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-2] (no packageset) | 02:39 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-raa [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-2] (no packageset) | 02:39 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-popgen [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-2] (no packageset) | 02:39 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-raa [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-2] (no packageset) | 02:40 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-raa [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-2] (no packageset) | 02:40 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-popgen [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-2] (no packageset) | 02:41 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-raa [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-2] (no packageset) | 02:41 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-popgen [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-2] (no packageset) | 02:41 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-seq-omics [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-2] (no packageset) | 02:42 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-seq-omics [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-2] (no packageset) | 02:42 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-seq-omics [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-2] (no packageset) | 02:42 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-seq-omics [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-2] (no packageset) | 02:45 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-seq-omics [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-2] (no packageset) | 02:46 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-seq-omics [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-2] (no packageset) | 02:47 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: oslo-sphinx (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.18.0-0ubuntu1 => 4.18.0-2] (no packageset) (sync) | 03:02 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted oslo-sphinx [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.18.0-2] | 03:03 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntukylin-theme (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.7.5 => 1.7.6] (ubuntukylin) | 03:36 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ukui-settings-daemon (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.5-0ubuntu1 => 1.1.6-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 03:50 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ukwm (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.7-0ubuntu1 => 1.1.8-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 04:17 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ukui-media (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.1-0ubuntu1 => 1.1.2-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 04:20 | |
flocculant | !team | thoughts on https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2018-April/004387.html | 04:22 |
tsimonq2 | \o/ | 04:23 |
flocculant | wrong channel | 04:25 |
flocculant | I'm not awake | 04:25 |
tsimonq2 | hehe | 04:25 |
tsimonq2 | ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ | 04:25 |
Bashing-om | flocculant: Whatever you big boys decide to do .. I will do what I can to help . | 04:31 |
valorie | big boys! | 04:31 |
* valorie is not a boy in any sense of the word | 04:32 | |
Bashing-om | hehe - It's the role - that I play such a small boy part of :) | 04:33 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libtickit (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.2-2 => 0.2-2ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 05:20 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libtickit [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.2-2ubuntu1] | 05:21 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pam-wrapper (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0.2-1 => 1.0.6-1] (no packageset) (sync) | 05:41 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pam-wrapper [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.6-1] | 05:41 | |
cpaelzer | Hi, anybody of the release team around that could consider FFE-ack'ing bug 1762315 ? | 06:00 |
ubot5` | bug 1762315 in qemu (Ubuntu) "slirp: Add domainname option to slirp's DHCP server" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1762315 | 06:00 |
cpaelzer | Another bug that would be great to have FFE exception soon would be bug 1761899 | 06:14 |
ubot5` | bug 1761899 in nginx (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Please merge with 1.13.10-1 from Debian unstable" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1761899 | 06:14 |
cpaelzer | good morning sil2100 | 06:15 |
cpaelzer | seeing you join, might I hijack you for an FFE-view on 1761899 and 1762315 ? | 06:15 |
sil2100 | Morning! | 06:17 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pocl (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0-2ubuntu1 => 1.1-4] (no packageset) (sync) | 06:17 | |
sil2100 | cpaelzer: let me take a look in 5 minutes | 06:18 |
cpaelzer | thanks, in case of questions let me know | 06:18 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pocl [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.1-4] | 06:18 | |
cpaelzer | sil2100: I'm dropping my daughter at kindergarden now, but really if there is anything while reviewing those bugs for FFE I'll be here with you again shortly | 06:38 |
sil2100 | cpaelzer: did you do a test build of the new version? | 06:45 |
sil2100 | cpaelzer: of nginx | 06:45 |
cpaelzer | sil2100: we did on the MP | 06:59 |
cpaelzer | sil2100: let me get you a linkg | 06:59 |
cpaelzer | sil2100: https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/3228/+packages | 06:59 |
cpaelzer | sil2100: from my MP review https://code.launchpad.net/~nacc/ubuntu/+source/nginx/+git/nginx/+merge/342762/comments/895908 | 06:59 |
sil2100 | cpaelzer: thanks! | 07:14 |
sil2100 | Yeah, didn't look at the MP, maybe I should have ;) | 07:14 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libtickit (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.2-2ubuntu1 => 0.2-2ubuntu2] (no packageset) | 07:15 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libtickit [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.2-2ubuntu2] | 07:15 | |
jamespage | doko: next cycle | 07:16 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libtickit [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.2-2ubuntu2] (no packageset) | 07:20 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libtickit [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.2-2ubuntu2] (no packageset) | 07:20 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libtickit [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.2-2ubuntu2] (no packageset) | 07:20 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libtickit [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.2-2ubuntu2] (no packageset) | 07:20 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libtickit [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.2-2ubuntu2] (no packageset) | 07:21 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: starjava-topcat (bionic-proposed/primary) [4.5.1-1] | 07:22 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libtickit [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.2-2ubuntu2] (no packageset) | 07:24 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libtickit [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [0.2-2ubuntu2] | 07:25 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libtickit [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [0.2-2ubuntu2] | 07:25 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libtickit [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [0.2-2ubuntu2] | 07:25 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected starjava-topcat [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.5.1-1] | 07:25 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libtickit [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [0.2-2ubuntu2] | 07:25 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libtickit [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [0.2-2ubuntu2] | 07:25 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libtickit [i386] (bionic-proposed) [0.2-2ubuntu2] | 07:25 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-seq-omics [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-1] | 07:25 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-seq-omics [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2] | 07:26 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-seq-omics [i386] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2] | 07:26 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-seq-omics [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2] | 07:26 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-seq-omics [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2] | 07:26 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-seq-omics [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2] | 07:26 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-popgen [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-1] | 07:26 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-popgen [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2] | 07:26 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-popgen [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2] | 07:26 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-popgen [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2] | 07:26 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-popgen [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2] | 07:26 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-popgen [i386] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2] | 07:26 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-popgen [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2] | 07:26 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-raa [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2] | 07:26 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-raa [i386] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2] | 07:26 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-raa [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2] | 07:26 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-seq-omics [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2] | 07:27 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-raa [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2] | 07:27 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-raa [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2] | 07:27 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-raa [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2] | 07:27 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-seq-omics [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-1] | 07:27 | |
sil2100 | cpaelzer: ok, both approved | 07:28 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: httping (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.5-1build1 => 2.5-1.1] (no packageset) (sync) | 07:29 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted httping [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.5-1.1] | 07:30 | |
cpaelzer | thank you so much sil2100 | 07:31 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: buildbot (bionic-proposed/primary) [1.1.1-1] | 07:40 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-8 (bionic-proposed/main) [8-20180406-0ubuntu1 => 8-20180408-0ubuntu1] (core) (sync) | 07:40 | |
slangasek | andyrock: hi, thanks for the branch on software-properties. Are you confident that moving the deps is not going to leave any runtime failures on systems that have software-properties-common / python3-software-properties installed but not software-properties-gtk? | 07:42 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted buildbot [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.1-1] | 07:43 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-8 [sync] (bionic-proposed) [8-20180408-0ubuntu1] | 07:43 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: buildbot [amd64] (bionic-proposed/none) [1.1.1-1] (no packageset) | 07:45 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted matplotlib [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.1.1-2ubuntu3] | 07:46 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted buildbot [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.1-1] | 07:48 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libgoogle-gson-java (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4-2 => 2.8.2-1] (no packageset) (sync) | 07:57 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libgoogle-gson-java [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.8.2-1] | 07:58 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: bppphyview (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.5.1-1 => 0.5.1-1build1] (no packageset) | 08:00 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libbpp-phyl (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.3.2-2 => 2.3.2-2build1] (no packageset) | 08:00 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: bppsuite (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.3.2-1 => 2.3.2-1build1] (no packageset) | 08:00 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libbpp-qt (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.3.2-1 => 2.3.2-1build1] (no packageset) | 08:00 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted bppphyview [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.5.1-1build1] | 08:01 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libbpp-phyl [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.3.2-2build1] | 08:01 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted bppsuite [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.3.2-1build1] | 08:01 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libbpp-qt [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.3.2-1build1] | 08:01 | |
Laney | slangasek: don't know, sorry, I didn't chase it down | 08:03 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: maffilter (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.2.1+dfsg-1build1 => 1.2.1+dfsg-1build2] (no packageset) | 08:03 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: physamp (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0.3-1 => 1.0.3-1build1] (no packageset) | 08:03 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: maven-javadoc-plugin (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.0.0-3 => 3.0.0-3] (no packageset) | 08:03 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted maven-javadoc-plugin [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.0.0-3] | 08:03 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted physamp [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.3-1build1] | 08:03 | |
Laney | oh, you found it, ok | 08:03 |
=== JerryKao is now known as Jerry-Bluefin | ||
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted maffilter [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.1+dfsg-1build2] | 08:04 | |
Laney | slangasek: ah, cdimage, no I guess mid-air collision | 08:05 |
Laney | slangasek: I checked http://releases.ubuntu.com/artful/ before updating and it said .1 already | 08:07 |
slangasek | ah, well then :) | 08:07 |
Laney | oh, you're here, hi | 08:08 |
* Laney expected replies in many hours :P | 08:08 | |
slangasek | :) | 08:09 |
Laney | 67 emails @ubuntu.com | 08:11 |
Laney | guess IS haven't deleted that stuck instance yet ... | 08:11 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: maven-javadoc-plugin (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.0.0-3 => 3.0.0-4] (no packageset) | 08:12 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted maven-javadoc-plugin [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.0.0-4] | 08:13 | |
jbicha | slangasek: you're probably better off uploading the remaining bpp packages from the Debian git repos to get the 2.4 versions | 08:16 |
slangasek | jbicha: that sounds like work. I was just attempting no-change rebuilds because I saw the transition was started (why?) | 08:17 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: vala (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.40.2-1 => 0.40.3-1] (ubuntu-desktop) (sync) | 08:17 | |
jbicha | the whole bpp thing is a mess, hopefully it's getting a bit better, Debian bug 890400 | 08:18 |
ubot5` | Debian bug 890400 in libbpp-core3 "libbpp-core3: ABI change without soname chenge" [Serious,Fixed] http://bugs.debian.org/890400 | 08:18 |
slangasek | hmm but you synced the new upstream version rather than merging just a fix to debian/control? | 08:19 |
jbicha | I think the fix was the new upstream series | 08:20 |
jbicha | libbpp-core 2.3.2-1 was already stuck in bionic-proposed before I synced the 2.4 series | 08:22 |
slangasek | ok | 08:22 |
slangasek | otoh wasn't it stuck because the autopkgtests were broken, because the revdeps needed a rebuild? | 08:23 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: golang-go-dbus (bionic-proposed/universe) [1~bzr20150203-0ubuntu1 => 1~bzr20150203-0ubuntu2] (no packageset) | 08:24 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted golang-go-dbus [source] (bionic-proposed) [1~bzr20150203-0ubuntu2] | 08:25 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: moonshot-trust-router (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.4.1-1build1 => 1.4.1-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 08:32 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted moonshot-trust-router [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.4.1-1ubuntu1] | 08:33 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: globus-gridftp-server (bionic-proposed/universe) [12.4-1build1 => 12.5-1] (no packageset) (sync) | 08:34 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted globus-gridftp-server [sync] (bionic-proposed) [12.5-1] | 08:36 | |
doko | slangasek: what is the regression in http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/r/ruby-fakeweb/bionic/armhf ? | 08:40 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nginx (bionic-proposed/main) [1.13.6-2ubuntu2 => 1.13.10-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server) | 08:40 | |
slangasek | doko: 1.3.0+git20131202.48208f9+dfsg-3 is badtested; if it's the same failure we should probably update the hint version? | 08:41 |
doko | slangasek: asking because the only passing test doesn''t have a log | 08:42 |
slangasek | doko: ah. that's because wrong links are generated from logs of tests that were run during a previous release | 08:43 |
doko | old run: 88 runs, 207 assertions, 20 failures, 54 errors, 0 skips | 08:43 |
doko | new run: 192 tests, 296 assertions, 11 failures, 0 errors, 0 pendings, 0 omissions, 0 notifications | 08:44 |
slangasek | yeah, the new package is much closer to passing. I'll hint it. | 08:44 |
acheronuk | slangasek: I'm just seeing what changes I can pull from kio-extras in debian, given that they are behind us in version. then I will test build what I get | 08:53 |
doko | slangasek: mvo claims a strange systemd setup to be the cause of the snapd autopkg test failure (on #snappy) | 08:54 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kio-extras (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:17.12.3-0ubuntu1 => 4:17.12.3-0ubuntu2] (kubuntu) | 09:18 | |
sil2100 | doko: could you point me to the snapd failure if you have it handy? | 09:24 |
doko | sil2100: http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/s/snapd/bionic/i386 | 09:25 |
doko | <mvo> doko: I doubt its a real issue, this works fine in our GCE environment, we see close to 100% success there (sometimes network related failures). I will check with Laney. | 09:26 |
doko | <mvo> doko, Laney an interessting observation is that they all (the recent ones) die in "+ journalctl --sync\n\n<kill-timeout reached>". makes me wonder if something is wrong with the systemd setup on these instance | 09:26 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mosquitto (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.4.15-1 => 1.4.15-2] (no packageset) (sync) | 09:30 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mosquitto [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.4.15-2] | 09:30 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gdb (bionic-proposed/main) [8.1-0ubuntu2 => 8.1-0ubuntu3] (core) | 09:52 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gdb [source] (bionic-proposed) [8.1-0ubuntu3] | 10:00 | |
Laney | anyone have any particular opinion on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libzip/+bug/1674057 ? | 10:14 |
ubot5` | Ubuntu bug 1674057 in libzip (Ubuntu) "[FFe] upgrade libzip to version 1.5.0" [Wishlist,New] | 10:14 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: binutils (bionic-proposed/main) [2.30-14ubuntu2 => 2.30-15ubuntu1] (core) | 10:18 | |
doko | Laney: given that we have a two year old version in the archive ... why not? | 10:23 |
Laney | because the new version might have bugs, it's late in the cycle, and it's a transition | 10:25 |
darkxst | Laney, it also switches to proven SSL code | 10:29 |
darkxst | upstream have been very responsive in my dealings with them | 10:30 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted binutils [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.30-15ubuntu1] | 10:30 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted synfig [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.1-0ubuntu4] | 10:30 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nginx [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.13.10-1ubuntu1] | 10:30 | |
Laney | darkxst: yes I know, I'm asking what people thing, not judging | 10:31 |
Laney | think | 10:31 |
Laney | doko asked "why not?" and I answered that question | 10:32 |
darkxst | ok | 10:34 |
acheronuk | Laney: would be nice for better zip support in ark, but I we have been building using libarchive for a few releases now and have had no real screams of anguish from users | 10:40 |
acheronuk | *but we | 10:40 |
LocutusOfBorg | tjaalton, jbicha did you break somewhere virtualbox on guest for bionic? https://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/17623 | 10:50 |
LocutusOfBorg | I see "Apr 7 09:00:35 bionic org.gnome.Shell.desktop[1214]: /usr/bin/gnome-shell: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libmutter-2.so.0: undefined symbol: glFramebufferTexture2D" | 10:50 |
darkxst | LocutusOfBorg, I think there is an upstream bug for that somewhere | 10:51 |
Laney | darkxst: probably grabbing a silo and uploading everything into that would be good | 10:51 |
tjaalton | LocutusOfBorg: I admit nothing :) | 10:51 |
LocutusOfBorg | I hope somebody will fix that soon, at least before release :/ | 10:54 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sssd (bionic-proposed/main) [1.16.0-5ubuntu2 => 1.16.1-1ubuntu1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) | 10:54 | |
darkxst | Laney, sure, will do, what was the link to the CI-train again? | 10:57 |
darkxst | not used it in a while ;) | 10:58 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: vagrant-lxc (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.2.1-3ubuntu1 => 1.4.0-1] (ubuntu-cloud) (sync) | 11:00 | |
apw | Laney, as it is removing a non-standard crypto implentation that sounds like a fair plus to me | 11:03 |
apw | darkxst, did i suggest you asked rat-liff about this? did that happen? this was on the assumption they might be strongly +1 on that basis | 11:03 |
Laney | darkxst: bileto.u.c | 11:03 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted language-selector [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.187] | 11:06 | |
darkxst | apw, I think you might have mentioned it and i didnt follow up on that | 11:15 |
darkxst | ratliff, can you take a look at bug 1674057 | 11:17 |
ubot5` | bug 1674057 in libzip (Ubuntu) "[FFe] upgrade libzip to version 1.5.0" [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1674057 | 11:17 |
Laney | it's not actually in main tho | 11:18 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: base-files (bionic-proposed/main) [10ubuntu1 => 10.1ubuntu1] (core) | 11:21 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: yard (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.9.12-1ubuntu3 => 0.9.12-2] (no packageset) (sync) | 11:35 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted yard [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.9.12-2] | 11:35 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted vagrant-lxc [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.4.0-1] | 11:36 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-notifier (bionic-proposed/main) [3.189 => 3.190] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) | 11:38 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pam [source] (artful-proposed) [1.1.8-3.2ubuntu3.1] | 11:41 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pam [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.1.8-3.2ubuntu2.1] | 11:42 | |
jbicha | LocutusOfBorg: I use VirtualBox all the time, bionic guest on bionic host still works fine here | 11:47 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: usb-creator (bionic-proposed/main) [0.3.4 => 0.3.5] (ubuntu-desktop) | 11:50 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ibus [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.5.11-1ubuntu3~xenial1] | 11:52 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ibus (xenial-proposed/main) [1.5.11-1ubuntu2 => 1.5.11-1ubuntu2.1] (input-methods, kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) | 11:52 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-system-service (bionic-proposed/main) [0.3 => 0.3.1] (ubuntu-desktop) | 11:53 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-system-service [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.3.1] | 11:55 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted usb-creator [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.3.5] | 11:55 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted update-notifier [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.190] | 11:55 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ibus [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.5.11-1ubuntu2.1] | 11:56 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1004.4] (kernel) | 11:57 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1004.4] | 12:00 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: buildbot (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.1-1 => 1.1.1-2] (no packageset) | 12:13 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted buildbot [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.1-2] | 12:14 | |
LocutusOfBorg | thanks jbicha, maybe some not so common configuration | 12:19 |
jbicha | maybe different version of virtualbox or guest drivers? | 12:20 |
LocutusOfBorg | https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virtualbox/+question/665636 | 12:20 |
LocutusOfBorg | this refers to something old | 12:21 |
LocutusOfBorg | but quoting vbox-dev irc channel "Hi, if I enable 3D in ubuntu 18.04 guest (on macos 10.13 host), I get the following error on bootup so that the login screen doesn't appear, just a black screen." | 12:21 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libtemplate-perl (bionic-proposed/main) [2.24-1.2build5 => 2.27-1] (ubuntu-desktop) (sync) | 12:38 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qemu (bionic-proposed/main) [1:2.11+dfsg-1ubuntu5 => 1:2.11+dfsg-1ubuntu6] (ubuntu-server, virt) | 12:39 | |
cpaelzer | Hi Release Team - for quite a few days I was collecting and testing qemu fixes. | 12:39 |
cpaelzer | It is now in Bionic unapproved and I wanted to ask to accept this soon if that would not crash with the image building | 12:40 |
cpaelzer | See https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/bionic/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=qemu | 12:40 |
cpaelzer | The reason I poll more than the usual "waitin until you get to it" is that one of the fixes should really not be a day-0 SRU but in-release pocket | 12:41 |
cpaelzer | therefore and since murphy is an idiot surely hitting something on dep8 test or so I'd ask to check and accept it soon | 12:41 |
cpaelzer | I'll poll later again if no one found the time | 12:41 |
cpaelzer | thanks in advance | 12:41 |
cpaelzer | TL;DR - @release team - please accept new qemu into bionic-proposed | 12:42 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected qemu [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:2.5+dfsg-5ubuntu10.25] | 12:43 | |
cpaelzer | thank for x-proposed as well, but I assume that was the SRU Team | 12:47 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dtv-scan-tables [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0+git20171226.07b18ec-1] | 12:47 | |
cpaelzer | so should I ask for x-proposed to get b- ? :-) | 12:47 |
Laney | the queue's not that big; I should think qemu will get progressed quite soon | 12:48 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted partman-lvm [sync] (bionic-proposed) [123] | 12:48 | |
cpaelzer | sil2100: I think your reject only send me the first line | 12:52 |
cpaelzer | sil2100: but that means the essential part is missing | 12:52 |
cpaelzer | even in the mail I only got "What is the reason that the previous security update" | 12:52 |
cpaelzer | I assume something followed that half sentence that I could address, but ? | 12:53 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted yorick [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.2.04+dfsg1-9] | 12:53 | |
cpaelzer | the former security update is released =.24 and my upload did not revert or skip the former sec update (it is quite normal a.25 on top of .24) | 12:54 |
cpaelzer | sil2100: so please let me know what the reason was here, so that I can address your needs | 12:54 |
apw | cpaelzer, did you look in the bug, as if it was rejected by the review tools i believe it puts that in the bug too | 12:57 |
cpaelzer | apw: I found it - sil2100 realized it was cut and posted the full text in the bug | 12:58 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted bubblewrap [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.2.1-1] | 12:59 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libtemplate-perl [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.27-1] | 12:59 | |
sil2100 | cpaelzer: yeah, sorry about it, finger-error | 13:02 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted network-manager-pptp [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.6-1] | 13:02 | |
cpaelzer | sil2100: I foudn it in the bug, but I don't follow | 13:03 |
cpaelzer | sil2100: .24 to .25 is | 13:03 |
cpaelzer | changelog | 12 | 13:03 |
cpaelzer | patches/series | 2 | 13:03 |
cpaelzer | patches/ubuntu/lp-1723904-sprs-backport.patch | 634 +++++++++++++++++ | 13:03 |
cpaelzer | patches/ubuntu/lp-1723914-ppc64-set-msr-register.patch | 38 + | 13:03 |
cpaelzer | 4 files changed, 686 insertions(+) | 13:03 |
cpaelzer | that is the two bugs for the SRU 1 patch each and 1 line in d/p/series | 13:03 |
cpaelzer | + changelog | 13:03 |
cpaelzer | nothing else | 13:03 |
sil2100 | So the debdiff that was generated by LP was removing the two CVE patches and commenting them out in the debian/patches/series file | 13:03 |
sil2100 | Let me fetch the package and see if that's really how it looked in the package | 13:04 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted devhelp [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.1-1] | 13:04 | |
cpaelzer | sil2100: yeah please, if anything is odd by me I want to learn what it was | 13:04 |
cpaelzer | sil2100: and if not lets sort it out and I can requeue for your ack instead then | 13:04 |
cpaelzer | sil2100: IMHO it should be https://git.launchpad.net/~paelzer/ubuntu/+source/qemu/log/?h=ubuntu/xenial-devel | 13:06 |
sil2100 | cpaelzer: just so you know what I was talking about, the debdiff from LP: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/363323677/qemu_1%3A2.5+dfsg-5ubuntu10.23_1%3A2.5+dfsg-5ubuntu10.25.diff.gz | 13:06 |
* cpaelzer is reading | 13:06 | |
sil2100 | cpaelzer: if you check debian/patches/series, you'll see something strange happened | 13:06 |
* sil2100 downloads the source | 13:06 | |
cpaelzer | sil2100: this is a debdiff against the -2 version | 13:06 |
cpaelzer | sil2100: .23 never existed in real life | 13:07 |
cpaelzer | sil2100: .22 was a security update | 13:07 |
cpaelzer | .23 was a security update | 13:07 |
cpaelzer | we found a bug in .23 while in proposed | 13:07 |
sil2100 | Ok, I think I know what's up | 13:07 |
cpaelzer | .24 fixes that up | 13:07 |
cpaelzer | .24 is what is released now | 13:08 |
sil2100 | cpaelzer: could you re-upload? | 13:08 |
cpaelzer | sure, just a sec | 13:08 |
sil2100 | Actually I can just re-upload it now | 13:08 |
cpaelzer | as you prefer | 13:08 |
cpaelzer | I have the cmdline ready | 13:08 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rsyslog (bionic-proposed/main) [8.32.0-1ubuntu1 => 8.32.0-1ubuntu2] (core) | 13:09 | |
cpaelzer | you just stopped me hitting enter | 13:09 |
sil2100 | Ok, so you had it handy too, please proceed! | 13:09 |
cpaelzer | uploaded | 13:09 |
cpaelzer | sil2100: and now showing up int the queue again for me | 13:10 |
cpaelzer | warning - the diff LP creates is again against .23 (for whatever reason) | 13:10 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qemu (xenial-proposed/main) [1:2.5+dfsg-5ubuntu10.24 => 1:2.5+dfsg-5ubuntu10.25] (ubuntu-server, virt) | 13:10 | |
apw | now that would explain a lot ... | 13:10 |
cpaelzer | and with .23 never existing it is quite reasonable that this diff made the least sense | 13:11 |
* cpaelzer is double checking his changes file and rmadison | 13:11 | |
cpaelzer | no .24 is really the oen listed everywhere https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/xenial/+source/qemu | 13:12 |
sil2100 | That's all good, the mistake here was on my part - I read the changes wrongly | 13:12 |
cpaelzer | ok, thanks for sorting it out with me so quickly | 13:12 |
sil2100 | I read it in reverse | 13:13 |
cpaelzer | to finish this as FYI .23 never made it further than -proposed | 13:13 |
sil2100 | Yeah, this I know, I checked the bug and the package itself, this part was clear | 13:13 |
sil2100 | What I though happened was that the security regression update got reverted, but in fact no, it was just appearing in the diff as expected | 13:14 |
cpaelzer | ok | 13:14 |
cpaelzer | And since this was way too much text in here I feel obliged to ask again @Release team to ack qemu currently in bionic-unapproved :-) | 13:15 |
sil2100 | cpaelzer: I can take care of that too ;p | 13:15 |
cpaelzer | I'm here in case this one looks odd as well :-) | 13:15 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: groovy (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.14-1 => 2.4.15-1] (no packageset) (sync) | 13:16 | |
cpaelzer | TL;DR changes in there that are not allowed as 0-day-SRU but have to be on -release pocket | 13:16 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted groovy [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.15-1] | 13:16 | |
sil2100 | cpaelzer: not a blocker I think, but is it common for changelog entries to have links to private bugs? | 13:19 |
sil2100 | cpaelzer: since LP: #1704312 seems to be privateish | 13:19 |
ubot5` | Error: Launchpad bug 1704312 could not be found | 13:19 |
sil2100 | I have access, but I guess other people might get sad ;) | 13:19 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qemu [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:2.5+dfsg-5ubuntu10.25] | 13:22 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: 183 entries have been added or removed | 13:25 | |
cpaelzer | sil2100: it is not yet opened, but eventually will no more be provate | 13:25 |
cpaelzer | sil2100: private | 13:25 |
sil2100 | ACK ;) | 13:25 |
cpaelzer | sil2100: and yes, I even link to those (even if they stay private) | 13:26 |
* cpaelzer looks for a policy on this to adapt ... | 13:26 | |
cpaelzer | this was opened when the feature was still secret - therefore the private on this particular case | 13:26 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qemu [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:2.11+dfsg-1ubuntu6] | 13:27 | |
sil2100 | I just don't really know myself, I would expect all bugs mentioned in public uploads to be public, but as said I don't consider that a blocker as I don't really know if there's any policy for that | 13:46 |
sil2100 | At least not for devel, for SRUs they have to be public | 13:47 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rsyslog (bionic-proposed/main) [8.32.0-1ubuntu1 => 8.32.0-1ubuntu3] (core) | 13:49 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntukylin-theme [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.7.6] | 13:50 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ukui-panel [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.3-0ubuntu1] | 13:50 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ukwm [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.8-0ubuntu1] | 13:50 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ukui-media [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.2-0ubuntu1] | 13:50 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ukui-settings-daemon [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.6-0ubuntu1] | 13:50 | |
acheronuk | sil2100: will that packagset update show soon, or not until tomorrow? | 13:59 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apt (trusty-proposed/main) [1.0.1ubuntu2.17 => 1.0.1ubuntu2.18] (core) | 14:00 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted vala [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.40.3-1] | 14:02 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: networkd-dispatcher (bionic-proposed/primary) [1.7-0ubuntu1] | 14:06 | |
acheronuk | sil2100: ok. seems I can upload things I wanted now even through the online list has not update yet. thanks :) | 14:06 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mm-common (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.9.11-2 => 0.9.12-1] (no packageset) (sync) | 14:10 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mm-common [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.9.12-1] | 14:10 | |
sil2100 | acheronuk: yeah, it doesn't refresh super often | 14:27 |
sil2100 | acheronuk: ok, good! yw | 14:27 |
Laney | acheronuk: you can use edit-acl from lp:ubuntu-archive-tools to query that in realtime | 14:28 |
acheronuk | Laney: cheers. handy to know :) | 14:29 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zfs-linux (bionic-proposed/main) [0.7.5-1ubuntu13 => 0.7.5-1ubuntu14] (core) | 14:32 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted zfs-linux [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.7.5-1ubuntu14] | 14:47 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-meta (bionic-proposed/main) [1.414 => 1.415] (core) | 14:57 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted networkd-dispatcher [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.7-0ubuntu1] | 15:00 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pluma (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.20.1-0ubuntu1 => 1.20.1-2ubuntu1] (ubuntu-mate, ubuntukylin) | 15:04 | |
doko | Laney: do armhf autopkg testers need some attention? | 15:11 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: networkd-dispatcher [amd64] (bionic-proposed/none) [1.7-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 15:12 | |
Laney | possibly | 15:15 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted networkd-dispatcher [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [1.7-0ubuntu1] | 15:15 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kdelibs4support (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.44.0-0ubuntu1 => 5.44.0-0ubuntu2] (kubuntu) | 15:32 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: cxlflash (bionic-proposed/primary) [5.0.2669-0ubuntu1] | 15:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-session (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.0-0ubuntu3 => 3.28.0-0ubuntu4] (ubuntu-desktop) | 15:45 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: poppler (bionic-proposed/main) [0.62.0-1ubuntu1 => 0.62.0-2ubuntu1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) | 16:13 | |
=== nacc_ is now known as nacc | ||
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pkgbinarymangler (bionic-proposed/main) [135 => 136] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) | 16:27 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox (bionic-proposed/multiverse) [5.2.8-dfsg-5 => 5.2.8-dfsg-6] (ubuntu-cloud) (sync) | 16:46 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libcommons-compress-java (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.13-1 => 1.13-2] (no packageset) (sync) | 16:58 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libcommons-compress-java [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.13-2] | 16:58 | |
doko | stgraber, slangasek: please update the hint for vagrant-lxc. same failure as before | 17:05 |
stgraber | doko: no idea who maintains this thing but it's not something the LXC/LXD team cares about or supports in any way. I'm on vacation this week so if I have any spare time to look at it it'd be next week | 17:09 |
slangasek | jbicha: is one of these versions of yorick going to fix the autopkgtests and not require hinting? | 17:09 |
doko | stgraber: you spend more time typing that than fixing it and just replying "ok". but maybe you're typing as fast as you are speaking ;p | 17:10 |
stgraber | doko: well, I have no idea what that package is or what it does, so I don't think it'd be something I can fix in 30s :) | 17:13 |
stgraber | doko: unless you consider me running remove-package as a fix :) | 17:13 |
slangasek | doko: hint updated | 17:14 |
slangasek | stgraber: this was a release-team-oriented request, perhaps he misread tumbleweed's file as yours, no implication of package ownership | 17:15 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kubuntu-settings (bionic-proposed/universe) [1:18.04ubuntu10 => 1:18.04ubuntu11] (kubuntu) | 17:29 | |
acheronuk | slangasek: if you have time, could you perhaps take a look at LP: #1762479 | 17:31 |
ubot5` | Launchpad bug 1762479 in kdeconnect (Ubuntu Bionic) "[FFe] KdeConnect 1.3.0 for Bionic" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1762479 | 17:31 |
acheronuk | thanks | 17:31 |
slangasek | acheronuk: FFe approved. Historically, flavors were allowed latitude in self-managing FFes for packages that were core parts of their image and that only they had seeded; perhaps we should discuss (but not just at this moment) getting back to that state, so that we don't need to be a bottleneck for you | 17:36 |
acheronuk | slangasek: oh, I did not realise that. I know when kubuntu had core devs, release team, and AAs on the team, things obviously went quicker, but what you say makes sense | 17:37 |
doko | xnox: I'm going to reject cxlflash | 17:39 |
slangasek | acheronuk: it was instigated at a time when that was true, but not implicitly tied to the flavor leads having those roles | 17:39 |
acheronuk | case in point, I may have another one for kstars later, if I can get the devs to give up a human readable changelog | 17:39 |
doko | xnox: src/build/install/resources/license/* looks like it's non-free. or do you want to have that in multiverse? | 17:39 |
acheronuk | right. I see. lets discuss that for next time around (18.10) then | 17:40 |
slangasek | doko: why are you directing that comment to xnox? wasn't sil2100 working on cxlflash? | 17:41 |
doko | ahh, ok | 17:42 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected cxlflash [source] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.2669-0ubuntu1] | 17:43 | |
doko | and email him about it | 17:46 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kdeconnect (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.2.1-0ubuntu2 => 1.3.0-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu) | 17:51 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pylint-django (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.9.0-2 => 0.9.4-1] (no packageset) (sync) | 17:53 | |
doko | ginggs: could you have a look at pandas? ftbfs on arm64 and s390x | 17:53 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pylint-django [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.9.4-1] | 17:54 | |
ginggs | doko: is removing 0.22.0-2 from proposed and uploading 0.20.3-11 (which seemed to build everywhere) an option? | 18:00 |
slangasek | ginggs: 0.20.3-11 was previously in -proposed and at the time it ftbfs everywhere in Ubuntu; would that no longer be the case? https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pandas/0.20.3-11 | 18:02 |
ginggs | testing it my PPA now... but just wanted to know if that was an option | 18:08 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: maxima (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.41.0-2 => 5.41.0-3] (no packageset) (sync) | 18:09 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted maxima [sync] (bionic-proposed) [5.41.0-3] | 18:09 | |
doko | slangasek: your python-cdo change isn't forwarded to debian | 18:12 |
slangasek | doko: ok | 18:13 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pylint (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.8.1-1 => 1.8.3-1] (no packageset) (sync) | 18:14 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pylint [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.8.3-1] | 18:15 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pkgbinarymangler [source] (bionic-proposed) [136] | 18:32 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pyserial (bionic-proposed/main) [3.4-1 => 3.4-2] (edubuntu, kubuntu, ubuntu-server) (sync) | 18:46 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: elfutils (bionic-proposed/main) [0.170-0.3 => 0.170-0.4] (core) (sync) | 18:46 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted elfutils [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.170-0.4] | 18:48 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pyserial [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.4-2] | 18:48 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: etl (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.2.1-0ubuntu1 => 1.2.1-0.1] (no packageset) (sync) | 18:57 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted etl [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.1-0.1] | 18:57 | |
ginggs | it looks like pandas 0.20.3-11 is still going to FTBFS everywhere :( I will have a look at 0.22.0-2 tomorrow | 19:07 |
jbicha | slangasek: no idea about yorick, maybe :| | 19:29 |
doko | slangasek: please badtest ruby-pkg-config/1.2.9-1. the autopkg test fails because it has some -I include flags twice. no idea how to fix that. but that's something which doesn't hurt | 19:39 |
jbicha | ok, I see that the new yorick version didn't pass its Ubuntu autopkgtests either :( | 19:44 |
slangasek | jbicha: this was my point, yes :) | 19:50 |
slangasek | doko: looking | 19:50 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: software-properties (bionic-proposed/main) [0.96.24.26 => 0.96.24.27] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) | 19:51 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cups (bionic-proposed/main) [2.2.7-1ubuntu1 => 2.2.7-1ubuntu2] (core) | 19:53 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kio-extras [source] (bionic-proposed) [4:17.12.3-0ubuntu2] | 19:54 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rsyslog [source] (bionic-proposed) [8.32.0-1ubuntu2] | 19:55 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rsyslog [source] (bionic-proposed) [8.32.0-1ubuntu3] | 19:55 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-7-cross (bionic-proposed/main) [20ubuntu1 => 20ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop) (sync) | 20:10 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-oslo.versionedobjects (artful-proposed/main) [1.26.0-0ubuntu1 => 1.26.0-0ubuntu2] (kubuntu, openstack, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) | 20:13 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-oslo.versionedobjects (bionic-proposed/main) [1.31.2-0ubuntu1 => 1.31.2-0ubuntu2] (kubuntu, openstack, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) | 20:14 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: buildbot (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.1-2 => 1.1.1-3] (no packageset) | 20:17 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted buildbot [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.1-3] | 20:18 | |
infinity | tsimonq2: Looks like you got a bunch of concensus before posting. Excellent. | 20:22 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-7-cross [sync] (bionic-proposed) [20ubuntu2] | 20:22 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-oslo.versionedobjects [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.31.2-0ubuntu2] | 20:22 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-oslo.versionedobjects (xenial-proposed/main) [1.8.0-1 => 1.8.0-1ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server) | 20:26 | |
flocculant | infinity: did you notice my ping re the additional software tool leaving conf file behind when removing nvidia? bug 1761593 | 20:28 |
ubot5` | bug 1761593 in software-properties (Ubuntu) "Uninstall left nouveau blacklisted" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1761593 | 20:28 |
flocculant | thought that it might be prudent to flag that | 20:28 |
tsimonq2 | infinity: I did, yeahp | 20:32 |
infinity | flocculant: I'm not sure reassigning that from nvidia-graphics to software-properties makes sense. | 20:33 |
infinity | flocculant: If a package's unpurged conffiles cause the system to misbehave, the package is at fault, not the user who removed instead of purging. | 20:33 |
flocculant | ok - made sense to me at the time | 20:35 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted base-files [source] (bionic-proposed) [10.1ubuntu1] | 20:36 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-meta [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.415] | 20:36 | |
flocculant | but I had just installed/reinstalled a bunch of times in different methods - so possibly losing the plot a bit ;) | 20:36 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox [sync] (bionic-proposed) [5.2.8-dfsg-6] | 20:36 | |
flocculant | regardless of which package - I thought I'd best let someone in here know about it | 20:37 |
tsimonq2 | slangasek: You hit the nail on the head with what I was insinuating wrt the whole "let's improve our automated testing" part of the email. | 20:37 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ruby-gnome2 (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.2.3-2 => 3.2.4-1] (no packageset) (sync) | 20:39 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-boxes (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.27.92-1 => 3.28.1-1] (desktop-extra) (sync) | 20:39 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ruby-gnome2 [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.2.4-1] | 20:40 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: aseba (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.6.0-2 => 1.6.0-3] (no packageset) (sync) | 20:41 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted aseba [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.6.0-3] | 20:42 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sblim-sfcb (bionic-proposed/multiverse) [1.4.9-0ubuntu3 => 1.4.9-0ubuntu4] (no packageset) | 20:42 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: partman-md (bionic-proposed/main) [85 => 86] (core) (sync) | 20:42 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sblim-sfcb [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.4.9-0ubuntu4] | 20:43 | |
flocculant | infinity: also I guess I didn't look deeply enough at what happened in 17.10 there - I just checked what softwre-properties did there - and it removed the conf file | 20:48 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: appstream-glib (xenial-proposed/main) [0.5.13-1ubuntu5 => 0.5.13-1ubuntu6] (desktop-core) | 21:00 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sblim-sfcb (bionic-proposed/multiverse) [1.4.9-0ubuntu3 => 1.4.9-0ubuntu5] (no packageset) | 21:05 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sblim-sfcb [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.4.9-0ubuntu5] | 21:05 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sssd [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.16.1-1ubuntu1] | 21:16 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: budgie-desktop-environment (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.9.7 => 0.9.8] (personal-fossfreedom, ubuntu-budgie) | 21:27 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: budgie-extras (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.4.3-0ubuntu1 => 0.4.4-0ubuntu1] (personal-fossfreedom, ubuntu-budgie) | 21:38 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ruby-gollum-lib (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.2.1+debian-1 => 4.2.7-1] (no packageset) (sync) | 21:39 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ruby-gollum-lib [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.2.7-1] | 21:40 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: hyphen-ru (bionic-proposed/main) [20030310-1ubuntu2 => 20030310-1ubuntu3] (personal-gunnarhj, ubuntu-desktop) | 21:41 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: myspell-hr (bionic-proposed/main) [20060617-2.4 => 20060617-2.4ubuntu1] (personal-gunnarhj, ubuntu-desktop) | 22:08 | |
doko | this is fun, even gsl and maxima transitioned now \o/ | 22:17 |
slangasek | doko: reran ruby-pkg-config autopkgtest against release pocket and confirmed it's broken there also; hint added | 22:22 |
doko | now that's ruby-concurrent left on armhf ... | 22:23 |
slangasek | why oh why did someone make redis build on i386 | 22:27 |
nacc | lol | 22:28 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pluma [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.20.1-2ubuntu1] | 22:30 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted software-properties [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.96.24.27] | 22:31 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ruby-delayed-job (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.0.6-2ubuntu1 => 4.1.4-1] (no packageset) (sync) | 22:43 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ruby-delayed-job [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.1.4-1] | 22:43 | |
tsimonq2 | infinity: Was any progress made on that Ubiquity bug? | 22:47 |
infinity | tsimonq2: Steve has an MP that I need to revisit because over the weekend, I had a thought that maybe the fix was correct, but the placement was not. And need to verify that. | 22:48 |
infinity | Also, "correct", in that I still don't understand *why* this is happening, and *why* it's only on lubuntu. | 22:48 |
tsimonq2 | OK. | 22:48 |
infinity | Which annoys me. | 22:48 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: jellyfish (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.2.8-3 => 2.2.8-3] (no packageset) (sync) | 23:02 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted jellyfish [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.2.8-3] | 23:03 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pdbg (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0-1 => 1.0-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 23:21 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pdbg [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.0-1ubuntu1] | 23:21 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pdbg [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 23:26 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: unity (bionic-proposed/universe) [7.5.0+18.04.20180404-0ubuntu2 => 7.5.0+18.04.20180409-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) (sync) | 23:30 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted unity [sync] (bionic-proposed) [7.5.0+18.04.20180409-0ubuntu1] | 23:31 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-getting-started-docs (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.0+git20180331-0ubuntu1 => 3.28.1-0ubuntu1] (personal-gunnarhj, ubuntu-desktop) | 23:51 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nautic (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.5-3 => 1.5-4] (no packageset) (sync) | 23:51 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nautic [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.5-4] | 23:52 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libwx-scintilla-perl (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.39-3build2 => 0.39-4] (no packageset) (sync) | 23:53 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libwx-scintilla-perl [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.39-4] | 23:53 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-user-docs (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.0+git20180331-0ubuntu1 => 3.28.1-0ubuntu1] (personal-gunnarhj, ubuntu-desktop) | 23:53 | |
slangasek | doko: I'm not sure, but I think the tpm2-tss armhf FTBFS may be a toolchain bug; trying to step through with gdb, and test/unit/tcti-device.c:164 is never executed | 23:55 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!