[00:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnucash (bionic-proposed/universe) [1:2.6.18-1 => 1:2.6.19-1] (no packageset) (sync) [00:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-tweaks (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.28.0-1 => 3.28.1-1] (no packageset) (sync) [00:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-tweaks [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.1-1] [00:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnucash [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1:2.6.19-1] [00:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: bubblewrap (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.2.0-4 => 0.2.1-1] (ubuntugnome) (sync) [00:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: network-manager-pptp (bionic-proposed/main) [1.2.4-5build1 => 1.2.6-1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) (sync) [00:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-shell-extension-autohidetopbar (bionic-proposed/universe) [20171126-1 => 20171126-2] (no packageset) (sync) [00:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ruby-gnome2 (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.2.3-1 => 3.2.3-2] (no packageset) (sync) [00:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-shell-extension-autohidetopbar [sync] (bionic-proposed) [20171126-2] [00:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: spectre-meltdown-checker (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.35-1 => 0.36-1] (no packageset) (sync) [00:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ruby-gnome2 [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.2.3-2] [00:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: devhelp (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.0-1 => 3.28.1-1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) (sync) [00:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted spectre-meltdown-checker [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.36-1] [01:49] infinity, slangasek: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2018-April/004387.html <-- my proposal regarding getting rid of milestones, resulting from the discussion we had a few weeks ago. [02:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ukui-panel (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.2-0ubuntu1 => 1.1.3-0ubuntu1] (ubuntukylin) [02:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libbpp-popgen (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-1 => 2.4.0-2] (no packageset) (sync) [02:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libbpp-popgen [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2] [02:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libbpp-phyl-omics (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-1 => 2.4.0-2] (no packageset) (sync) [02:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libbpp-raa (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.3.2-1 => 2.4.0-2] (no packageset) (sync) [02:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libbpp-phyl-omics [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2] [02:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libbpp-raa [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2] [02:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-popgen [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-2] (no packageset) [02:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-popgen [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-2] (no packageset) [02:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-raa [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-2] (no packageset) [02:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-raa [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-2] (no packageset) [02:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-popgen [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-2] (no packageset) [02:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-raa [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-2] (no packageset) [02:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-popgen [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-2] (no packageset) [02:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-raa [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-2] (no packageset) [02:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-raa [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-2] (no packageset) [02:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-popgen [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-2] (no packageset) [02:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-raa [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-2] (no packageset) [02:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-popgen [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-2] (no packageset) [02:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-seq-omics [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-2] (no packageset) [02:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-seq-omics [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-2] (no packageset) [02:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-seq-omics [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-2] (no packageset) [02:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-seq-omics [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-2] (no packageset) [02:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-seq-omics [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-2] (no packageset) [02:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-seq-omics [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-2] (no packageset) [03:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: oslo-sphinx (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.18.0-0ubuntu1 => 4.18.0-2] (no packageset) (sync) [03:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted oslo-sphinx [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.18.0-2] [03:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntukylin-theme (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.7.5 => 1.7.6] (ubuntukylin) [03:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ukui-settings-daemon (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.5-0ubuntu1 => 1.1.6-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) [04:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ukwm (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.7-0ubuntu1 => 1.1.8-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) [04:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ukui-media (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.1-0ubuntu1 => 1.1.2-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) [04:22] !team | thoughts on https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2018-April/004387.html [04:23] \o/ [04:25] wrong channel [04:25] I'm not awake [04:25] hehe [04:25] ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ [04:31] flocculant: Whatever you big boys decide to do .. I will do what I can to help . [04:31] big boys! [04:32] * valorie is not a boy in any sense of the word [04:33] hehe - It's the role - that I play such a small boy part of :) [05:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libtickit (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.2-2 => 0.2-2ubuntu1] (no packageset) [05:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libtickit [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.2-2ubuntu1] [05:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pam-wrapper (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0.2-1 => 1.0.6-1] (no packageset) (sync) [05:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pam-wrapper [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.6-1] [06:00] Hi, anybody of the release team around that could consider FFE-ack'ing bug 1762315 ? [06:00] bug 1762315 in qemu (Ubuntu) "slirp: Add domainname option to slirp's DHCP server" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1762315 [06:14] Another bug that would be great to have FFE exception soon would be bug 1761899 [06:14] bug 1761899 in nginx (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Please merge with 1.13.10-1 from Debian unstable" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1761899 [06:15] good morning sil2100 [06:15] seeing you join, might I hijack you for an FFE-view on 1761899 and 1762315 ? [06:17] Morning! [06:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pocl (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0-2ubuntu1 => 1.1-4] (no packageset) (sync) [06:18] cpaelzer: let me take a look in 5 minutes [06:18] thanks, in case of questions let me know [06:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pocl [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.1-4] [06:38] sil2100: I'm dropping my daughter at kindergarden now, but really if there is anything while reviewing those bugs for FFE I'll be here with you again shortly [06:45] cpaelzer: did you do a test build of the new version? [06:45] cpaelzer: of nginx [06:59] sil2100: we did on the MP [06:59] sil2100: let me get you a linkg [06:59] sil2100: https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/3228/+packages [06:59] sil2100: from my MP review https://code.launchpad.net/~nacc/ubuntu/+source/nginx/+git/nginx/+merge/342762/comments/895908 [07:14] cpaelzer: thanks! [07:14] Yeah, didn't look at the MP, maybe I should have ;) [07:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libtickit (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.2-2ubuntu1 => 0.2-2ubuntu2] (no packageset) [07:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libtickit [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.2-2ubuntu2] [07:16] doko: next cycle [07:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libtickit [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.2-2ubuntu2] (no packageset) [07:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libtickit [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.2-2ubuntu2] (no packageset) [07:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libtickit [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.2-2ubuntu2] (no packageset) [07:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libtickit [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.2-2ubuntu2] (no packageset) [07:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libtickit [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.2-2ubuntu2] (no packageset) [07:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: starjava-topcat (bionic-proposed/primary) [4.5.1-1] [07:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libtickit [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.2-2ubuntu2] (no packageset) [07:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libtickit [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [0.2-2ubuntu2] [07:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libtickit [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [0.2-2ubuntu2] [07:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libtickit [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [0.2-2ubuntu2] [07:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected starjava-topcat [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.5.1-1] [07:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libtickit [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [0.2-2ubuntu2] [07:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libtickit [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [0.2-2ubuntu2] [07:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libtickit [i386] (bionic-proposed) [0.2-2ubuntu2] [07:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-seq-omics [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-1] [07:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-seq-omics [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2] [07:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-seq-omics [i386] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2] [07:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-seq-omics [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2] [07:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-seq-omics [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2] [07:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-seq-omics [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2] [07:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-popgen [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-1] [07:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-popgen [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2] [07:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-popgen [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2] [07:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-popgen [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2] [07:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-popgen [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2] [07:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-popgen [i386] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2] [07:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-popgen [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2] [07:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-raa [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2] [07:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-raa [i386] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2] [07:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-raa [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2] [07:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-seq-omics [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2] [07:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-raa [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2] [07:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-raa [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2] [07:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-raa [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2] [07:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-seq-omics [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-1] [07:28] cpaelzer: ok, both approved [07:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: httping (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.5-1build1 => 2.5-1.1] (no packageset) (sync) [07:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted httping [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.5-1.1] [07:31] thank you so much sil2100 [07:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: buildbot (bionic-proposed/primary) [1.1.1-1] [07:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-8 (bionic-proposed/main) [8-20180406-0ubuntu1 => 8-20180408-0ubuntu1] (core) (sync) [07:42] andyrock: hi, thanks for the branch on software-properties. Are you confident that moving the deps is not going to leave any runtime failures on systems that have software-properties-common / python3-software-properties installed but not software-properties-gtk? [07:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted buildbot [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.1-1] [07:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-8 [sync] (bionic-proposed) [8-20180408-0ubuntu1] [07:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: buildbot [amd64] (bionic-proposed/none) [1.1.1-1] (no packageset) [07:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted matplotlib [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.1.1-2ubuntu3] [07:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted buildbot [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.1-1] [07:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libgoogle-gson-java (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4-2 => 2.8.2-1] (no packageset) (sync) [07:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libgoogle-gson-java [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.8.2-1] [08:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: bppphyview (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.5.1-1 => 0.5.1-1build1] (no packageset) [08:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libbpp-phyl (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.3.2-2 => 2.3.2-2build1] (no packageset) [08:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: bppsuite (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.3.2-1 => 2.3.2-1build1] (no packageset) [08:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libbpp-qt (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.3.2-1 => 2.3.2-1build1] (no packageset) [08:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted bppphyview [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.5.1-1build1] [08:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libbpp-phyl [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.3.2-2build1] [08:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted bppsuite [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.3.2-1build1] [08:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libbpp-qt [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.3.2-1build1] [08:03] slangasek: don't know, sorry, I didn't chase it down [08:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: maffilter (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.2.1+dfsg-1build1 => 1.2.1+dfsg-1build2] (no packageset) [08:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: physamp (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0.3-1 => 1.0.3-1build1] (no packageset) [08:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: maven-javadoc-plugin (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.0.0-3 => 3.0.0-3] (no packageset) [08:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted maven-javadoc-plugin [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.0.0-3] [08:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted physamp [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.3-1build1] [08:03] oh, you found it, ok === JerryKao is now known as Jerry-Bluefin [08:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted maffilter [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.1+dfsg-1build2] [08:05] slangasek: ah, cdimage, no I guess mid-air collision [08:07] slangasek: I checked http://releases.ubuntu.com/artful/ before updating and it said .1 already [08:07] ah, well then :) [08:08] oh, you're here, hi [08:08] * Laney expected replies in many hours :P [08:09] :) [08:11] 67 emails @ubuntu.com [08:11] guess IS haven't deleted that stuck instance yet ... [08:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: maven-javadoc-plugin (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.0.0-3 => 3.0.0-4] (no packageset) [08:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted maven-javadoc-plugin [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.0.0-4] [08:16] slangasek: you're probably better off uploading the remaining bpp packages from the Debian git repos to get the 2.4 versions [08:17] jbicha: that sounds like work. I was just attempting no-change rebuilds because I saw the transition was started (why?) [08:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: vala (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.40.2-1 => 0.40.3-1] (ubuntu-desktop) (sync) [08:18] the whole bpp thing is a mess, hopefully it's getting a bit better, Debian bug 890400 [08:18] Debian bug 890400 in libbpp-core3 "libbpp-core3: ABI change without soname chenge" [Serious,Fixed] http://bugs.debian.org/890400 [08:19] hmm but you synced the new upstream version rather than merging just a fix to debian/control? [08:20] I think the fix was the new upstream series [08:22] libbpp-core 2.3.2-1 was already stuck in bionic-proposed before I synced the 2.4 series [08:22] ok [08:23] otoh wasn't it stuck because the autopkgtests were broken, because the revdeps needed a rebuild? [08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: golang-go-dbus (bionic-proposed/universe) [1~bzr20150203-0ubuntu1 => 1~bzr20150203-0ubuntu2] (no packageset) [08:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted golang-go-dbus [source] (bionic-proposed) [1~bzr20150203-0ubuntu2] [08:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: moonshot-trust-router (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.4.1-1build1 => 1.4.1-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) [08:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted moonshot-trust-router [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.4.1-1ubuntu1] [08:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: globus-gridftp-server (bionic-proposed/universe) [12.4-1build1 => 12.5-1] (no packageset) (sync) [08:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted globus-gridftp-server [sync] (bionic-proposed) [12.5-1] [08:40] slangasek: what is the regression in http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/r/ruby-fakeweb/bionic/armhf ? [08:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nginx (bionic-proposed/main) [1.13.6-2ubuntu2 => 1.13.10-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server) [08:41] doko: 1.3.0+git20131202.48208f9+dfsg-3 is badtested; if it's the same failure we should probably update the hint version? [08:42] slangasek: asking because the only passing test doesn''t have a log [08:43] doko: ah. that's because wrong links are generated from logs of tests that were run during a previous release [08:43] old run: 88 runs, 207 assertions, 20 failures, 54 errors, 0 skips [08:44] new run: 192 tests, 296 assertions, 11 failures, 0 errors, 0 pendings, 0 omissions, 0 notifications [08:44] yeah, the new package is much closer to passing. I'll hint it. [08:53] slangasek: I'm just seeing what changes I can pull from kio-extras in debian, given that they are behind us in version. then I will test build what I get [08:54] slangasek: mvo claims a strange systemd setup to be the cause of the snapd autopkg test failure (on #snappy) [09:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kio-extras (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:17.12.3-0ubuntu1 => 4:17.12.3-0ubuntu2] (kubuntu) [09:24] doko: could you point me to the snapd failure if you have it handy? [09:25] sil2100: http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/s/snapd/bionic/i386 [09:26] doko: I doubt its a real issue, this works fine in our GCE environment, we see close to 100% success there (sometimes network related failures). I will check with Laney. [09:26] doko, Laney an interessting observation is that they all (the recent ones) die in "+ journalctl --sync\n\n". makes me wonder if something is wrong with the systemd setup on these instance [09:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mosquitto (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.4.15-1 => 1.4.15-2] (no packageset) (sync) [09:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mosquitto [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.4.15-2] [09:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gdb (bionic-proposed/main) [8.1-0ubuntu2 => 8.1-0ubuntu3] (core) [10:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gdb [source] (bionic-proposed) [8.1-0ubuntu3] [10:14] anyone have any particular opinion on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libzip/+bug/1674057 ? [10:14] Ubuntu bug 1674057 in libzip (Ubuntu) "[FFe] upgrade libzip to version 1.5.0" [Wishlist,New] [10:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: binutils (bionic-proposed/main) [2.30-14ubuntu2 => 2.30-15ubuntu1] (core) [10:23] Laney: given that we have a two year old version in the archive ... why not? [10:25] because the new version might have bugs, it's late in the cycle, and it's a transition [10:29] Laney, it also switches to proven SSL code [10:30] upstream have been very responsive in my dealings with them [10:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted binutils [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.30-15ubuntu1] [10:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted synfig [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.1-0ubuntu4] [10:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nginx [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.13.10-1ubuntu1] [10:31] darkxst: yes I know, I'm asking what people thing, not judging [10:31] think [10:32] doko asked "why not?" and I answered that question [10:34] ok [10:40] Laney: would be nice for better zip support in ark, but I we have been building using libarchive for a few releases now and have had no real screams of anguish from users [10:40] *but we [10:50] tjaalton, jbicha did you break somewhere virtualbox on guest for bionic? https://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/17623 [10:50] I see "Apr 7 09:00:35 bionic org.gnome.Shell.desktop[1214]: /usr/bin/gnome-shell: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libmutter-2.so.0: undefined symbol: glFramebufferTexture2D" [10:51] LocutusOfBorg, I think there is an upstream bug for that somewhere [10:51] darkxst: probably grabbing a silo and uploading everything into that would be good [10:51] LocutusOfBorg: I admit nothing :) [10:54] I hope somebody will fix that soon, at least before release :/ [10:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sssd (bionic-proposed/main) [1.16.0-5ubuntu2 => 1.16.1-1ubuntu1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) [10:57] Laney, sure, will do, what was the link to the CI-train again? [10:58] not used it in a while ;) [11:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: vagrant-lxc (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.2.1-3ubuntu1 => 1.4.0-1] (ubuntu-cloud) (sync) [11:03] Laney, as it is removing a non-standard crypto implentation that sounds like a fair plus to me [11:03] darkxst, did i suggest you asked rat-liff about this? did that happen? this was on the assumption they might be strongly +1 on that basis [11:03] darkxst: bileto.u.c [11:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted language-selector [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.187] [11:15] apw, I think you might have mentioned it and i didnt follow up on that [11:17] ratliff, can you take a look at bug 1674057 [11:17] bug 1674057 in libzip (Ubuntu) "[FFe] upgrade libzip to version 1.5.0" [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1674057 [11:18] it's not actually in main tho [11:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: base-files (bionic-proposed/main) [10ubuntu1 => 10.1ubuntu1] (core) [11:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: yard (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.9.12-1ubuntu3 => 0.9.12-2] (no packageset) (sync) [11:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted yard [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.9.12-2] [11:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted vagrant-lxc [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.4.0-1] [11:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-notifier (bionic-proposed/main) [3.189 => 3.190] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) [11:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pam [source] (artful-proposed) [1.1.8-3.2ubuntu3.1] [11:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pam [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.1.8-3.2ubuntu2.1] [11:47] LocutusOfBorg: I use VirtualBox all the time, bionic guest on bionic host still works fine here [11:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: usb-creator (bionic-proposed/main) [0.3.4 => 0.3.5] (ubuntu-desktop) [11:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ibus [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.5.11-1ubuntu3~xenial1] [11:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ibus (xenial-proposed/main) [1.5.11-1ubuntu2 => 1.5.11-1ubuntu2.1] (input-methods, kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) [11:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-system-service (bionic-proposed/main) [0.3 => 0.3.1] (ubuntu-desktop) [11:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-system-service [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.3.1] [11:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted usb-creator [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.3.5] [11:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted update-notifier [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.190] [11:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ibus [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.5.11-1ubuntu2.1] [11:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1004.4] (kernel) [12:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1004.4] [12:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: buildbot (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.1-1 => 1.1.1-2] (no packageset) [12:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted buildbot [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.1-2] [12:19] thanks jbicha, maybe some not so common configuration [12:20] maybe different version of virtualbox or guest drivers? [12:20] https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virtualbox/+question/665636 [12:21] this refers to something old [12:21] but quoting vbox-dev irc channel "Hi, if I enable 3D in ubuntu 18.04 guest (on macos 10.13 host), I get the following error on bootup so that the login screen doesn't appear, just a black screen." [12:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libtemplate-perl (bionic-proposed/main) [2.24-1.2build5 => 2.27-1] (ubuntu-desktop) (sync) [12:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qemu (bionic-proposed/main) [1:2.11+dfsg-1ubuntu5 => 1:2.11+dfsg-1ubuntu6] (ubuntu-server, virt) [12:39] Hi Release Team - for quite a few days I was collecting and testing qemu fixes. [12:40] It is now in Bionic unapproved and I wanted to ask to accept this soon if that would not crash with the image building [12:40] See https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/bionic/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=qemu [12:41] The reason I poll more than the usual "waitin until you get to it" is that one of the fixes should really not be a day-0 SRU but in-release pocket [12:41] therefore and since murphy is an idiot surely hitting something on dep8 test or so I'd ask to check and accept it soon [12:41] I'll poll later again if no one found the time [12:41] thanks in advance [12:42] TL;DR - @release team - please accept new qemu into bionic-proposed [12:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected qemu [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:2.5+dfsg-5ubuntu10.25] [12:47] thank for x-proposed as well, but I assume that was the SRU Team [12:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dtv-scan-tables [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0+git20171226.07b18ec-1] [12:47] so should I ask for x-proposed to get b- ? :-) [12:48] the queue's not that big; I should think qemu will get progressed quite soon [12:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted partman-lvm [sync] (bionic-proposed) [123] [12:52] sil2100: I think your reject only send me the first line [12:52] sil2100: but that means the essential part is missing [12:52] even in the mail I only got "What is the reason that the previous security update" [12:53] I assume something followed that half sentence that I could address, but ? [12:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted yorick [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.2.04+dfsg1-9] [12:54] the former security update is released =.24 and my upload did not revert or skip the former sec update (it is quite normal a.25 on top of .24) [12:54] sil2100: so please let me know what the reason was here, so that I can address your needs [12:57] cpaelzer, did you look in the bug, as if it was rejected by the review tools i believe it puts that in the bug too [12:58] apw: I found it - sil2100 realized it was cut and posted the full text in the bug [12:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted bubblewrap [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.2.1-1] [12:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libtemplate-perl [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.27-1] [13:02] cpaelzer: yeah, sorry about it, finger-error [13:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted network-manager-pptp [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.6-1] [13:03] sil2100: I foudn it in the bug, but I don't follow [13:03] sil2100: .24 to .25 is [13:03] changelog | 12 [13:03] patches/series | 2 [13:03] patches/ubuntu/lp-1723904-sprs-backport.patch | 634 +++++++++++++++++ [13:03] patches/ubuntu/lp-1723914-ppc64-set-msr-register.patch | 38 + [13:03] 4 files changed, 686 insertions(+) [13:03] that is the two bugs for the SRU 1 patch each and 1 line in d/p/series [13:03] + changelog [13:03] nothing else [13:03] So the debdiff that was generated by LP was removing the two CVE patches and commenting them out in the debian/patches/series file [13:04] Let me fetch the package and see if that's really how it looked in the package [13:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted devhelp [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.1-1] [13:04] sil2100: yeah please, if anything is odd by me I want to learn what it was [13:04] sil2100: and if not lets sort it out and I can requeue for your ack instead then [13:06] sil2100: IMHO it should be https://git.launchpad.net/~paelzer/ubuntu/+source/qemu/log/?h=ubuntu/xenial-devel [13:06] cpaelzer: just so you know what I was talking about, the debdiff from LP: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/363323677/qemu_1%3A2.5+dfsg-5ubuntu10.23_1%3A2.5+dfsg-5ubuntu10.25.diff.gz [13:06] * cpaelzer is reading [13:06] cpaelzer: if you check debian/patches/series, you'll see something strange happened [13:06] * sil2100 downloads the source [13:06] sil2100: this is a debdiff against the -2 version [13:07] sil2100: .23 never existed in real life [13:07] sil2100: .22 was a security update [13:07] .23 was a security update [13:07] we found a bug in .23 while in proposed [13:07] Ok, I think I know what's up [13:07] .24 fixes that up [13:08] .24 is what is released now [13:08] cpaelzer: could you re-upload? [13:08] sure, just a sec [13:08] Actually I can just re-upload it now [13:08] as you prefer [13:08] I have the cmdline ready [13:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rsyslog (bionic-proposed/main) [8.32.0-1ubuntu1 => 8.32.0-1ubuntu2] (core) [13:09] you just stopped me hitting enter [13:09] Ok, so you had it handy too, please proceed! [13:09] uploaded [13:10] sil2100: and now showing up int the queue again for me [13:10] warning - the diff LP creates is again against .23 (for whatever reason) [13:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qemu (xenial-proposed/main) [1:2.5+dfsg-5ubuntu10.24 => 1:2.5+dfsg-5ubuntu10.25] (ubuntu-server, virt) [13:10] now that would explain a lot ... [13:11] and with .23 never existing it is quite reasonable that this diff made the least sense [13:11] * cpaelzer is double checking his changes file and rmadison [13:12] no .24 is really the oen listed everywhere https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/xenial/+source/qemu [13:12] That's all good, the mistake here was on my part - I read the changes wrongly [13:12] ok, thanks for sorting it out with me so quickly [13:13] I read it in reverse [13:13] to finish this as FYI .23 never made it further than -proposed [13:13] Yeah, this I know, I checked the bug and the package itself, this part was clear [13:14] What I though happened was that the security regression update got reverted, but in fact no, it was just appearing in the diff as expected [13:14] ok [13:15] And since this was way too much text in here I feel obliged to ask again @Release team to ack qemu currently in bionic-unapproved :-) [13:15] cpaelzer: I can take care of that too ;p [13:15] I'm here in case this one looks odd as well :-) [13:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: groovy (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.14-1 => 2.4.15-1] (no packageset) (sync) [13:16] TL;DR changes in there that are not allowed as 0-day-SRU but have to be on -release pocket [13:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted groovy [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.15-1] [13:19] cpaelzer: not a blocker I think, but is it common for changelog entries to have links to private bugs? [13:19] cpaelzer: since LP: #1704312 seems to be privateish [13:19] Error: Launchpad bug 1704312 could not be found [13:19] I have access, but I guess other people might get sad ;) [13:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qemu [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:2.5+dfsg-5ubuntu10.25] [13:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: 183 entries have been added or removed [13:25] sil2100: it is not yet opened, but eventually will no more be provate [13:25] sil2100: private [13:25] ACK ;) [13:26] sil2100: and yes, I even link to those (even if they stay private) [13:26] * cpaelzer looks for a policy on this to adapt ... [13:26] this was opened when the feature was still secret - therefore the private on this particular case [13:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qemu [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:2.11+dfsg-1ubuntu6] [13:46] I just don't really know myself, I would expect all bugs mentioned in public uploads to be public, but as said I don't consider that a blocker as I don't really know if there's any policy for that [13:47] At least not for devel, for SRUs they have to be public [13:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rsyslog (bionic-proposed/main) [8.32.0-1ubuntu1 => 8.32.0-1ubuntu3] (core) [13:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntukylin-theme [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.7.6] [13:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ukui-panel [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.3-0ubuntu1] [13:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ukwm [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.8-0ubuntu1] [13:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ukui-media [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.2-0ubuntu1] [13:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ukui-settings-daemon [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.6-0ubuntu1] [13:59] sil2100: will that packagset update show soon, or not until tomorrow? [14:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apt (trusty-proposed/main) [1.0.1ubuntu2.17 => 1.0.1ubuntu2.18] (core) [14:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted vala [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.40.3-1] [14:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: networkd-dispatcher (bionic-proposed/primary) [1.7-0ubuntu1] [14:06] sil2100: ok. seems I can upload things I wanted now even through the online list has not update yet. thanks :) [14:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mm-common (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.9.11-2 => 0.9.12-1] (no packageset) (sync) [14:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mm-common [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.9.12-1] [14:27] acheronuk: yeah, it doesn't refresh super often [14:27] acheronuk: ok, good! yw [14:28] acheronuk: you can use edit-acl from lp:ubuntu-archive-tools to query that in realtime [14:29] Laney: cheers. handy to know :) [14:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zfs-linux (bionic-proposed/main) [0.7.5-1ubuntu13 => 0.7.5-1ubuntu14] (core) [14:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted zfs-linux [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.7.5-1ubuntu14] [14:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-meta (bionic-proposed/main) [1.414 => 1.415] (core) [15:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted networkd-dispatcher [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.7-0ubuntu1] [15:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pluma (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.20.1-0ubuntu1 => 1.20.1-2ubuntu1] (ubuntu-mate, ubuntukylin) [15:11] Laney: do armhf autopkg testers need some attention? [15:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: networkd-dispatcher [amd64] (bionic-proposed/none) [1.7-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) [15:15] possibly [15:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted networkd-dispatcher [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [1.7-0ubuntu1] [15:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kdelibs4support (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.44.0-0ubuntu1 => 5.44.0-0ubuntu2] (kubuntu) [15:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: cxlflash (bionic-proposed/primary) [5.0.2669-0ubuntu1] [15:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-session (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.0-0ubuntu3 => 3.28.0-0ubuntu4] (ubuntu-desktop) [16:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: poppler (bionic-proposed/main) [0.62.0-1ubuntu1 => 0.62.0-2ubuntu1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) === nacc_ is now known as nacc [16:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pkgbinarymangler (bionic-proposed/main) [135 => 136] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) [16:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox (bionic-proposed/multiverse) [5.2.8-dfsg-5 => 5.2.8-dfsg-6] (ubuntu-cloud) (sync) [16:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libcommons-compress-java (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.13-1 => 1.13-2] (no packageset) (sync) [16:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libcommons-compress-java [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.13-2] [17:05] stgraber, slangasek: please update the hint for vagrant-lxc. same failure as before [17:09] doko: no idea who maintains this thing but it's not something the LXC/LXD team cares about or supports in any way. I'm on vacation this week so if I have any spare time to look at it it'd be next week [17:09] jbicha: is one of these versions of yorick going to fix the autopkgtests and not require hinting? [17:10] stgraber: you spend more time typing that than fixing it and just replying "ok". but maybe you're typing as fast as you are speaking ;p [17:13] doko: well, I have no idea what that package is or what it does, so I don't think it'd be something I can fix in 30s :) [17:13] doko: unless you consider me running remove-package as a fix :) [17:14] doko: hint updated [17:15] stgraber: this was a release-team-oriented request, perhaps he misread tumbleweed's file as yours, no implication of package ownership [17:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kubuntu-settings (bionic-proposed/universe) [1:18.04ubuntu10 => 1:18.04ubuntu11] (kubuntu) [17:31] slangasek: if you have time, could you perhaps take a look at LP: #1762479 [17:31] Launchpad bug 1762479 in kdeconnect (Ubuntu Bionic) "[FFe] KdeConnect 1.3.0 for Bionic" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1762479 [17:31] thanks [17:36] acheronuk: FFe approved. Historically, flavors were allowed latitude in self-managing FFes for packages that were core parts of their image and that only they had seeded; perhaps we should discuss (but not just at this moment) getting back to that state, so that we don't need to be a bottleneck for you [17:37] slangasek: oh, I did not realise that. I know when kubuntu had core devs, release team, and AAs on the team, things obviously went quicker, but what you say makes sense [17:39] xnox: I'm going to reject cxlflash [17:39] acheronuk: it was instigated at a time when that was true, but not implicitly tied to the flavor leads having those roles [17:39] case in point, I may have another one for kstars later, if I can get the devs to give up a human readable changelog [17:39] xnox: src/build/install/resources/license/* looks like it's non-free. or do you want to have that in multiverse? [17:40] right. I see. lets discuss that for next time around (18.10) then [17:41] doko: why are you directing that comment to xnox? wasn't sil2100 working on cxlflash? [17:42] ahh, ok [17:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected cxlflash [source] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.2669-0ubuntu1] [17:46] and email him about it [17:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kdeconnect (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.2.1-0ubuntu2 => 1.3.0-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu) [17:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pylint-django (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.9.0-2 => 0.9.4-1] (no packageset) (sync) [17:53] ginggs: could you have a look at pandas? ftbfs on arm64 and s390x [17:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pylint-django [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.9.4-1] [18:00] doko: is removing 0.22.0-2 from proposed and uploading 0.20.3-11 (which seemed to build everywhere) an option? [18:02] ginggs: 0.20.3-11 was previously in -proposed and at the time it ftbfs everywhere in Ubuntu; would that no longer be the case? https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pandas/0.20.3-11 [18:08] testing it my PPA now... but just wanted to know if that was an option [18:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: maxima (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.41.0-2 => 5.41.0-3] (no packageset) (sync) [18:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted maxima [sync] (bionic-proposed) [5.41.0-3] [18:12] slangasek: your python-cdo change isn't forwarded to debian [18:13] doko: ok [18:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pylint (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.8.1-1 => 1.8.3-1] (no packageset) (sync) [18:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pylint [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.8.3-1] [18:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pkgbinarymangler [source] (bionic-proposed) [136] [18:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pyserial (bionic-proposed/main) [3.4-1 => 3.4-2] (edubuntu, kubuntu, ubuntu-server) (sync) [18:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: elfutils (bionic-proposed/main) [0.170-0.3 => 0.170-0.4] (core) (sync) [18:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted elfutils [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.170-0.4] [18:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pyserial [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.4-2] [18:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: etl (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.2.1-0ubuntu1 => 1.2.1-0.1] (no packageset) (sync) [18:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted etl [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.1-0.1] [19:07] it looks like pandas 0.20.3-11 is still going to FTBFS everywhere :( I will have a look at 0.22.0-2 tomorrow [19:29] slangasek: no idea about yorick, maybe :| [19:39] slangasek: please badtest ruby-pkg-config/1.2.9-1. the autopkg test fails because it has some -I include flags twice. no idea how to fix that. but that's something which doesn't hurt [19:44] ok, I see that the new yorick version didn't pass its Ubuntu autopkgtests either :( [19:50] jbicha: this was my point, yes :) [19:50] doko: looking [19:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: software-properties (bionic-proposed/main) [0.96.24.26 => 0.96.24.27] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) [19:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cups (bionic-proposed/main) [2.2.7-1ubuntu1 => 2.2.7-1ubuntu2] (core) [19:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kio-extras [source] (bionic-proposed) [4:17.12.3-0ubuntu2] [19:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rsyslog [source] (bionic-proposed) [8.32.0-1ubuntu2] [19:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rsyslog [source] (bionic-proposed) [8.32.0-1ubuntu3] [20:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-7-cross (bionic-proposed/main) [20ubuntu1 => 20ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop) (sync) [20:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-oslo.versionedobjects (artful-proposed/main) [1.26.0-0ubuntu1 => 1.26.0-0ubuntu2] (kubuntu, openstack, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) [20:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-oslo.versionedobjects (bionic-proposed/main) [1.31.2-0ubuntu1 => 1.31.2-0ubuntu2] (kubuntu, openstack, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) [20:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: buildbot (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.1-2 => 1.1.1-3] (no packageset) [20:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted buildbot [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.1-3] [20:22] tsimonq2: Looks like you got a bunch of concensus before posting. Excellent. [20:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-7-cross [sync] (bionic-proposed) [20ubuntu2] [20:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-oslo.versionedobjects [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.31.2-0ubuntu2] [20:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-oslo.versionedobjects (xenial-proposed/main) [1.8.0-1 => 1.8.0-1ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server) [20:28] infinity: did you notice my ping re the additional software tool leaving conf file behind when removing nvidia? bug 1761593 [20:28] bug 1761593 in software-properties (Ubuntu) "Uninstall left nouveau blacklisted" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1761593 [20:28] thought that it might be prudent to flag that [20:32] infinity: I did, yeahp [20:33] flocculant: I'm not sure reassigning that from nvidia-graphics to software-properties makes sense. [20:33] flocculant: If a package's unpurged conffiles cause the system to misbehave, the package is at fault, not the user who removed instead of purging. [20:35] ok - made sense to me at the time [20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted base-files [source] (bionic-proposed) [10.1ubuntu1] [20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-meta [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.415] [20:36] but I had just installed/reinstalled a bunch of times in different methods - so possibly losing the plot a bit ;) [20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox [sync] (bionic-proposed) [5.2.8-dfsg-6] [20:37] regardless of which package - I thought I'd best let someone in here know about it [20:37] slangasek: You hit the nail on the head with what I was insinuating wrt the whole "let's improve our automated testing" part of the email. [20:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ruby-gnome2 (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.2.3-2 => 3.2.4-1] (no packageset) (sync) [20:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-boxes (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.27.92-1 => 3.28.1-1] (desktop-extra) (sync) [20:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ruby-gnome2 [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.2.4-1] [20:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: aseba (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.6.0-2 => 1.6.0-3] (no packageset) (sync) [20:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted aseba [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.6.0-3] [20:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sblim-sfcb (bionic-proposed/multiverse) [1.4.9-0ubuntu3 => 1.4.9-0ubuntu4] (no packageset) [20:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: partman-md (bionic-proposed/main) [85 => 86] (core) (sync) [20:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sblim-sfcb [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.4.9-0ubuntu4] [20:48] infinity: also I guess I didn't look deeply enough at what happened in 17.10 there - I just checked what softwre-properties did there - and it removed the conf file [21:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: appstream-glib (xenial-proposed/main) [0.5.13-1ubuntu5 => 0.5.13-1ubuntu6] (desktop-core) [21:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sblim-sfcb (bionic-proposed/multiverse) [1.4.9-0ubuntu3 => 1.4.9-0ubuntu5] (no packageset) [21:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sblim-sfcb [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.4.9-0ubuntu5] [21:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sssd [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.16.1-1ubuntu1] [21:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: budgie-desktop-environment (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.9.7 => 0.9.8] (personal-fossfreedom, ubuntu-budgie) [21:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: budgie-extras (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.4.3-0ubuntu1 => 0.4.4-0ubuntu1] (personal-fossfreedom, ubuntu-budgie) [21:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ruby-gollum-lib (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.2.1+debian-1 => 4.2.7-1] (no packageset) (sync) [21:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ruby-gollum-lib [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.2.7-1] [21:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: hyphen-ru (bionic-proposed/main) [20030310-1ubuntu2 => 20030310-1ubuntu3] (personal-gunnarhj, ubuntu-desktop) [22:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: myspell-hr (bionic-proposed/main) [20060617-2.4 => 20060617-2.4ubuntu1] (personal-gunnarhj, ubuntu-desktop) [22:17] this is fun, even gsl and maxima transitioned now \o/ [22:22] doko: reran ruby-pkg-config autopkgtest against release pocket and confirmed it's broken there also; hint added [22:23] now that's ruby-concurrent left on armhf ... [22:27] why oh why did someone make redis build on i386 [22:28] lol [22:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pluma [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.20.1-2ubuntu1] [22:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted software-properties [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.96.24.27] [22:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ruby-delayed-job (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.0.6-2ubuntu1 => 4.1.4-1] (no packageset) (sync) [22:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ruby-delayed-job [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.1.4-1] [22:47] infinity: Was any progress made on that Ubiquity bug? [22:48] tsimonq2: Steve has an MP that I need to revisit because over the weekend, I had a thought that maybe the fix was correct, but the placement was not. And need to verify that. [22:48] Also, "correct", in that I still don't understand *why* this is happening, and *why* it's only on lubuntu. [22:48] OK. [22:48] Which annoys me. [23:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: jellyfish (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.2.8-3 => 2.2.8-3] (no packageset) (sync) [23:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted jellyfish [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.2.8-3] [23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pdbg (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0-1 => 1.0-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) [23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pdbg [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.0-1ubuntu1] [23:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pdbg [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) [23:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: unity (bionic-proposed/universe) [7.5.0+18.04.20180404-0ubuntu2 => 7.5.0+18.04.20180409-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) (sync) [23:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted unity [sync] (bionic-proposed) [7.5.0+18.04.20180409-0ubuntu1] [23:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-getting-started-docs (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.0+git20180331-0ubuntu1 => 3.28.1-0ubuntu1] (personal-gunnarhj, ubuntu-desktop) [23:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nautic (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.5-3 => 1.5-4] (no packageset) (sync) [23:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nautic [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.5-4] [23:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libwx-scintilla-perl (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.39-3build2 => 0.39-4] (no packageset) (sync) [23:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libwx-scintilla-perl [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.39-4] [23:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-user-docs (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.0+git20180331-0ubuntu1 => 3.28.1-0ubuntu1] (personal-gunnarhj, ubuntu-desktop) [23:55] doko: I'm not sure, but I think the tpm2-tss armhf FTBFS may be a toolchain bug; trying to step through with gdb, and test/unit/tcti-device.c:164 is never executed