| cyphermox | I can haz a look at that | 01:05 |
|---|---|---|
| cyphermox | oh, cute, and the enddianness failure on s390x... | 01:07 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: clamsmtp (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.10-16ubuntu1 => 1.10-17ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 02:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted clamsmtp [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.10-17ubuntu1] | 02:43 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pocl (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1-4 => 1.1-5] (no packageset) (sync) | 05:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pocl [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.1-5] | 05:04 | |
| slangasek | doko: solfege build failure is a segfault within initialization of /usr/lib/python3.6/lib-dynload/readline.cpython-36m-x86_64-linux-gnu.so, which seems somewhat improbable... | 05:22 |
| slangasek | doko: you're removing packages from -proposed that are not buggy and could become installable again if their dependencies were fixed in Debian? | 05:46 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: psortb (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.0.5+dfsg-1 => 3.0.5+dfsg-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 06:16 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted psortb [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.0.5+dfsg-1ubuntu1] | 06:17 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: psortb [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.0.5+dfsg-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 06:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: primer3 (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-1 => 2.4.0-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 06:24 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted primer3 [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-1ubuntu1] | 06:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kdelibs4support [source] (bionic-proposed) [5.44.0-0ubuntu2] | 06:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-session [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.0-0ubuntu4] | 06:29 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted poppler [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.62.0-2ubuntu1] | 06:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-session [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.0-0ubuntu4] (ubuntu-desktop) | 06:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-session [s390x] (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.0-0ubuntu4] (ubuntu-desktop) | 06:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-session [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.0-0ubuntu4] (ubuntu-desktop) | 06:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-session [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.0-0ubuntu4] (ubuntu-desktop) | 06:34 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pymoc (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.5.0-2 => 0.5.0-2ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 06:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pymoc [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.5.0-2ubuntu1] | 06:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-session [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.0-0ubuntu4] (ubuntu-desktop) | 06:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-session [armhf] (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.0-0ubuntu4] (ubuntu-desktop) | 06:35 | |
| acheronuk | morning. could the kdeconnect FFe in unapproved be let through if convenient. thanks | 06:56 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libinput (bionic-proposed/main) [1.10.3-2 => 1.10.4-1] (desktop-core) (sync) | 06:56 | |
| sil2100 | Looking | 07:03 |
| sil2100 | acheronuk: uh, did you put the wrong bug number for kdeconnect? Since the bug seems to point to krita | 07:04 |
| sil2100 | acheronuk: if that's indeed a mistake, please re-upload with the same version number, I'll reject this one and approve the other | 07:05 |
| acheronuk | sil2100: could be. I had both open in tabs yesterday. thanks | 07:05 |
| sil2100 | acheronuk: I'll look at the bug then ;) | 07:05 |
| sil2100 | acheronuk: also, the kubuntu-settings upload - it sounds like it changes visible parts of the UI? I guess it would need an UIFe? | 07:08 |
| sil2100 | (correct me if I'm wrong) | 07:08 |
| acheronuk | trivially, and I thought that was to ensure that UI did not change for people doing documentation for main ubuntu. this has zero impact on those issues | 07:11 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kdeconnect (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.2.1-0ubuntu2 => 1.3.0-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu) | 07:14 | |
| acheronuk | sil2100: we certainly have no documentation that promise whether we have that small separator or not | 07:16 |
| sil2100 | acheronuk: ok, I must say I am not sure about flavour-specific changes myself | 07:16 |
| sil2100 | So yeah, I guess we'll just slip it in | 07:16 |
| acheronuk | it is sort of a grey area. or at least debatable | 07:17 |
| acheronuk | thank. if it had been a bigger change affecting other things, I would have FFed or asked in advance | 07:17 |
| acheronuk | *thanks | 07:18 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected kdeconnect [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.3.0-0ubuntu1] | 07:18 | |
| sil2100 | (also, basically since you're from the Kubuntu team I'd anyway ACK your UIFe request ;) ) | 07:18 |
| sil2100 | Approved both, yw! | 07:19 |
| acheronuk | sil2100: did you see slangasek's comment on this yesterday? | 07:19 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cups [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.2.7-1ubuntu2] | 07:19 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kubuntu-settings [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:18.04ubuntu11] | 07:19 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kdeconnect [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.3.0-0ubuntu1] | 07:19 | |
| acheronuk | regards kdeconnect ffe | 07:19 |
| acheronuk | [18:36] <slangasek> acheronuk: FFe approved. Historically, flavors were allowed latitude in self-managing FFes for packages that were core parts of their image and that only they had seeded; perhaps we should discuss (but not just at this moment) getting back to that state, so that we don't need to be a bottleneck for you | 07:19 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted partman-md [sync] (bionic-proposed) [86] | 07:21 | |
| acheronuk | sil2100: anyway. thank you :) | 07:21 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted budgie-desktop-environment [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.9.8] | 07:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted budgie-extras [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.4.4-0ubuntu1] | 07:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted hyphen-ru [source] (bionic-proposed) [20030310-1ubuntu3] | 07:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted myspell-hr [source] (bionic-proposed) [20060617-2.4ubuntu1] | 07:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-getting-started-docs [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.1-0ubuntu1] | 07:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-user-docs [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.1-0ubuntu1] | 07:22 | |
| sil2100 | acheronuk: I guess I didn't :) Yeah, I'd really like this to be made clear somewhere so that we don't cause unnecessary delays here and there | 07:23 |
| acheronuk | +1 there | 07:23 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-user-docs [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.1-0ubuntu1] (personal-gunnarhj, ubuntu-desktop) | 07:34 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pillow (bionic-proposed/main) [5.0.0-1 => 5.1.0-1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) (sync) | 08:49 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-session [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.0-0ubuntu4] | 08:54 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-session [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.0-0ubuntu4] | 08:54 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-session [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.0-0ubuntu4] | 08:54 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-user-docs [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.1-0ubuntu1] | 08:54 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted psortb [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [3.0.5+dfsg-1ubuntu1] | 08:54 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-session [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.0-0ubuntu4] | 08:54 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-session [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.0-0ubuntu4] | 08:54 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-session [i386] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.0-0ubuntu4] | 08:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pdbg [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [1.0-1ubuntu1] | 08:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-boxes [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.1-1] | 08:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pillow [sync] (bionic-proposed) [5.1.0-1] | 08:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libinput [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.10.4-1] | 08:55 | |
| doko | slangasek: why would you want to keep buildN packages without binaries in proposed? | 08:57 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: enki-aseba (bionic-proposed/universe) [1:1.6.0-3 => 1:1.6.0-5] (no packageset) (sync) | 08:58 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted enki-aseba [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1:1.6.0-5] | 08:58 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-disk-utility (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.0-1ubuntu1 => 3.28.1-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) | 09:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ukui-session-manager (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.1-0ubuntu1 => 1.1.2-0ubuntu1] (ubuntukylin) | 09:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ristretto (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.8.2-1 => 0.8.2-1ubuntu1] (ubuntustudio, xubuntu) | 09:46 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pulseaudio (xenial-proposed/main) [1:8.0-0ubuntu3.8 => 1:8.0-0ubuntu3.9] (core) | 10:07 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: python-motor (bionic-proposed/primary) [1.2.1-1build1] | 10:50 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mongodb (bionic-proposed/universe) [1:3.4.7-1ubuntu4 => 1:3.4.14-3] (mozilla) (sync) | 10:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-motor [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.1-1build1] | 10:54 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-motor [amd64] (bionic-proposed/none) [1.2.1-1build1] (no packageset) | 10:57 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-motor [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.1-1build1] | 10:59 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: synfigstudio (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.2.1-0ubuntu3 => 1.2.1-0.1] (ubuntustudio) (sync) | 11:08 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | can you please accept mongodb so I can upload my merge without the orig tarball? it timeouts | 11:09 |
| LocutusOfBorg | it has an FFe for 3.6 already acked | 11:10 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I'm just uploading a 3.4 merge in the meanwhile, to unblock python-motor | 11:10 |
| jbicha | LocutusOfBorg: please talk to rbasak about mongodb work. I think there was a reason he wasn't just syncing the Debian version yet | 11:14 |
| jbicha | oh never mind, I see there was already discussion | 11:14 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mongodb (bionic-proposed/universe) [1:3.4.7-1ubuntu4 => 1:3.4.14-3ubuntu1] (mozilla) | 12:36 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | hurray mongodb uploaded | 12:36 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: r-cran-openssl (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0.1-1 => 1.0.1-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 12:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted r-cran-openssl [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.1-1ubuntu1] | 12:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openoffice.org-hyphenation-pl (bionic-proposed/main) [1:3.0a-4 => 1:3.0a-4ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) | 13:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-report (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0.5 => 1.0.6] (no packageset) | 13:26 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-report [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.6] | 13:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-report (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0.6 => 1.0.7] (no packageset) | 14:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-report [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.7] | 14:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (bionic-proposed/partner) [1:20180313.1-0ubuntu1 => 1:20180410.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 14:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libreoffice (bionic-proposed/main) [1:6.0.2-0ubuntu1 => 1:6.0.3-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) | 14:14 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-session (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.0-0ubuntu4 => 3.28.1-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) | 14:14 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libreoffice-l10n (bionic-proposed/main) [1:6.0.2-0ubuntu1 => 1:6.0.3-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) | 14:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: remmina (bionic-proposed/main) [1.2.0-rcgit.27+dfsg-4ubuntu1 => 1.2.0-rcgit.29+dfsg-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) | 14:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: r-cran-future (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.7.0-1 => 1.7.0-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 14:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted r-cran-future [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.7.0-1ubuntu1] | 14:38 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mongodb [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1:3.4.14-3] | 14:47 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted synfigstudio [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.1-0.1] | 14:47 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mongodb [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:3.4.14-3ubuntu1] | 14:47 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fastnetmon (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.3+dfsg-6 => 1.1.3+dfsg-6build1] (no packageset) | 14:47 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fastnetmon [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.3+dfsg-6build1] | 14:48 | |
| slangasek | doko: I'm not talking about buildN packages. You removed e.g. grafana-zabbix, which is not buggy but depends on a buggy package. If grafana gets fixed in Debian, it will be synced and grafana-zabbix will become migratable with no source changes; but now grafana-zabbix is gone, and won't reappear automatically when grafana is fixed | 15:07 |
| cjwatson | FYI, I'm currently deploying a new Launchpad revision that adds InRelease etc. to by-hash directories | 15:08 |
| cjwatson | It looks fine in tests, and I'll keep an eye on it, but please let me know if you see weirdness in that general area | 15:08 |
| doko | ahh, I see. good, then looking at the new upstream =) | 15:10 |
| xnox | sil2100, last subiquity respin fails to build =( http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/cd-build-logs/ubuntu-server/bionic/daily-live-20180410.1.log -> no live filesystems build succeeded | 15:11 |
| xnox | and diggin into there https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/bionic/ubuntu-server-live/+build/129016 | 15:11 |
| xnox | in https://launchpadlibrarian.net/364257125/buildlog_ubuntu_bionic_amd64_ubuntu-server-live_BUILDING.txt.gz shows that | 15:11 |
| xnox | + SNAPPY_STORE_NO_CDN=1 snap download core | 15:11 |
| xnox | 2018/04/10 12:47:07.907440 cmd.go:156: cannot read /proc/self/exe: readlink /proc/self/exe: no such file or directory | 15:11 |
| xnox | is this known? or need debugging / escalating? i guess something changed and snapd is no longer a happy camper inside lxd inside launchpad builder? | 15:12 |
| slangasek | doko: I don't care strongly about grafana-zabbix, but I've been avoiding removing such packages from -proposed as a policy | 15:14 |
| xnox | has all of zabbix been upgraded to support systemd as pid1? at one point it was upstart-only on ubuntu, and thus not working at all, and I thought all of zabbix needs removing | 15:14 |
| sil2100 | xnox: hmmm | 15:20 |
| sil2100 | xnox: looking, strange as I started it through nusakan so I'd expect it to work - let me see what I actually run | 15:20 |
| sil2100 | Ah | 15:21 |
| sil2100 | heh | 15:21 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: plasma-framework (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.44.0-0ubuntu2 => 5.44.0-0ubuntu3] (kubuntu) | 15:21 | |
| acheronuk | I tested that patch for upstream code review, so please let through when convenient ^^^ | 15:22 |
| sil2100 | xnox: no idea why this is now failing and was not failing 7 hours ago, I guess you'll have to ask around ;) | 15:23 |
| slangasek | xnox: no clue about that, and again I don't care about this particular package ;) I just care about knowing what rules we should follow when keeping or removing packages from -proposed, since that has implications for them coming back later | 15:24 |
| xnox | sil2100, or i guess the actuall error is: | 15:28 |
| xnox | xnox> error: received an unexpected http response code (503) when trying to download https://public.apps.ubuntu.com/download-origin/local/99T7MUlRhtI3U0QFgl5mXXESAiSwt776_4206.snap?sig=Ijk5VDdNVWxSaHRJM1UwUUZnbDVtWFhFU0FpU3d0Nzc2XzQyMDYuc25hcCI.Da44wA.PqfN1fhAv3tZT-1qaRnz5239kxg | 15:28 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity (bionic-proposed/main) [18.04.4 => 18.04.5] (core) | 15:33 | |
| cyphermox | jibel: ^ | 15:34 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: aseba (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.6.0-3 => 1.6.0-3ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 15:35 | |
| cyphermox | slangasek: ubiquity in unapproved would need a review/approval if you have the time; this is the upload for your TTY fixes, as well as the zram fix | 15:36 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted aseba [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.6.0-3ubuntu1] | 15:36 | |
| slangasek | cyphermox: accepted, thanks | 15:38 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubiquity [source] (bionic-proposed) [18.04.5] | 15:38 | |
| jibel | cyphermox, thanks | 15:40 |
| cyphermox | ta | 15:48 |
| doko | is OpenGL supposed to work on arm64? | 15:59 |
| ginggs | would someone please 'force-badtest nanopolish/0.9.0-1/arm64 nanopolish/0.9.0-1/armhf nanopolish/0.9.0-1/ppc64el nanopolish/0.9.0-1/s390x' ? it is only built for amd64 and i386 now | 16:02 |
| LocutusOfBorg | doko, is context enki-aseba aseba? debian enabled OpenGL with latest qt in arm64, ubuntu didn't, probably because qt in bionic is too old? /cc tsimonq2 | 16:04 |
| slangasek | doko: "ish". Qt is built against GLES instead of GL, so it has a similar set of qt-related ANAIS as armhf | 16:05 |
| doko | aseba doesn't detect a working qt on arm64 | 16:06 |
| slangasek | LocutusOfBorg: Ubuntu hasn't enabled OpenGL in arm64 specifically because OpenGLES is considered the more interesting target for Ubuntu arm64 targets | 16:06 |
| LocutusOfBorg | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtbase-opensource-src/5.9.4+dfsg-0ubuntu4 | 16:06 |
| slangasek | LocutusOfBorg: unless you're saying that the new Qt can somehow do both | 16:06 |
| LocutusOfBorg | this? :) | 16:06 |
| LocutusOfBorg | slangasek, I vaguely remember something like this, but please don't take my words seriously | 16:06 |
| slangasek | (OpenGL support on arm64 in Qt in Debian is not new) | 16:07 |
| LocutusOfBorg | this is why I cc'd tsimonq2 | 16:07 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: a7xpg (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.11.dfsg1-9build1 => 0.11.dfsg1-9ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 16:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted a7xpg [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.11.dfsg1-9ubuntu1] | 16:11 | |
| * tsimonq2 bounces to mitya57 | 16:15 | |
| tsimonq2 | I still need to learn why the graphics stack is the way it is irt arm and Qt. | 16:16 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-meta-gcp (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0.1003.4 => 4.15.0.1003.5] (kernel) | 16:18 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-meta-gcp [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0.1003.5] | 16:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wine-development (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.2-1 => 3.5-1] (no packageset) (sync) | 16:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wine-development [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.5-1] | 16:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: simplestreams (artful-proposed/main) [0.1.0~bzr450-0ubuntu1 => 0.1.0~bzr450-0ubuntu1.1] (ubuntu-server) | 16:39 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dell-recovery (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.57 => 1.58] (no packageset) | 16:39 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: simplestreams (xenial-proposed/main) [0.1.0~bzr426-0ubuntu1.2 => 0.1.0~bzr426-0ubuntu1.3] (ubuntu-server) | 16:39 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dell-recovery [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.58] | 16:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pymoc (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.5.0-2ubuntu1 => 0.5.0-2ubuntu2] (no packageset) | 16:49 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pymoc [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.5.0-2ubuntu2] | 16:51 | |
| doko | apw, please see https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/usbip/+bug/1723717 | 16:52 |
| ubot5` | Ubuntu bug 1723717 in linux (Ubuntu) "Please remove from archives: usbip & usbip-source" [Undecided,New] | 16:52 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: patch (bionic-proposed/main) [2.7.6-1 => 2.7.6-2] (core) (sync) | 16:55 | |
| mitya57 | doko, tsimonq2: in Debian, aseba FTBFS with OpenGL ES too (see armhf). The only difference with Ubuntu is that we use OpenGL ES also on arm64. | 17:13 |
| mitya57 | This upload is new, maybe the maintainer will fix that FTBFS soon. | 17:14 |
| doko | ok, then I'll remove the binary on arm64 | 17:30 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libreoffice-l10n [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:6.0.3-0ubuntu1] | 17:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openoffice.org-hyphenation-pl [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:3.0a-4ubuntu1] | 17:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libreoffice [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:6.0.3-0ubuntu1] | 17:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted patch [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.7.6-2] | 17:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: buildbot (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.1-3 => 1.1.1-3ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 17:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted buildbot [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.1-3ubuntu1] | 17:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ristretto [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.8.2-1ubuntu1] | 17:54 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-session [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.1-0ubuntu1] | 17:54 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: vte2.91 (bionic-proposed/main) [0.52.0-1ubuntu2 => 0.52.1-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) | 18:04 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: glib2.0 (bionic-proposed/main) [2.56.0-4ubuntu1 => 2.56.1-2ubuntu1] (core) | 18:05 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: aseba (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.6.0-3ubuntu1 => 1.6.0-3.1~build1] (no packageset) | 18:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted aseba [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.6.0-3.1~build1] | 18:11 | |
| smoser | hi. could someone NACK the artful and xenial uploads of simplestreams please ? | 18:15 |
| nacc | smoser: are you going to upload again? | 18:15 |
| smoser | well, wolsen requested another cherry-pick | 18:16 |
| smoser | i've updated the merge prposal to have those | 18:16 |
| nacc | smoser: if in unapproved, you can re-upload the same version | 18:16 |
| smoser | i can, yes. but just more clear if we NACK what is there. | 18:16 |
| nacc | smoser: as the version hasn't been burned yet, and the SRU team should review the latest upload | 18:16 |
| smoser | but yeah. not burned. | 18:17 |
| nacc | smoser: yeah i agree with you, just not necessarily blocking you either | 18:18 |
| smoser | right | 18:18 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-terminal (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.0-1ubuntu1 => 3.28.1-1ubuntu1] (desktop-core) | 18:19 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: jellyfish (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.2.8-3 => 2.2.8-3build1] (no packageset) | 18:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: primer3 (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-1ubuntu1 => 2.4.0-1ubuntu2] (no packageset) | 18:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted jellyfish [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.2.8-3build1] | 18:26 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted primer3 [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-1ubuntu2] | 18:26 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:20180410.1-0ubuntu1] | 18:33 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (trusty-proposed/partner) [1:20180313.1-0ubuntu0.14.04.1 => 1:20180410.1-0ubuntu0.14.04.1] (no packageset) | 18:34 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (xenial-proposed/partner) [1:20180313.1-0ubuntu0.16.04.1 => 1:20180410.1-0ubuntu0.16.04.1] (no packageset) | 18:34 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:20180410.1-0ubuntu0.16.04.1] | 18:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (trusty-proposed) [1:20180410.1-0ubuntu0.14.04.1] | 18:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-calculator (bionic-proposed/main) [1:3.28.0-1ubuntu1 => 1:3.28.1-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) | 18:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ruby-graphviz (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.2.3-1 => 1.2.3-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 20:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ruby-graphviz [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.3-1ubuntu1] | 20:29 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: buildbot (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.1-3ubuntu1 => 1.1.1-3ubuntu2] (no packageset) | 20:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted buildbot [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.1-3ubuntu2] | 20:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: software-properties (bionic-proposed/main) [0.96.24.27 => 0.96.24.28] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) | 21:15 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-mate-settings (bionic-proposed/universe) [18.04.14 => 18.04.15] (ubuntu-mate) | 21:18 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mate-desktop (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.20.1-1ubuntu1 => 1.20.1-1ubuntu2] (ubuntu-mate, ubuntukylin, xubuntu) | 21:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-builder (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.28.0-1ubuntu1 => 3.28.1-1ubuntu1] (desktop-extra) | 21:38 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: atril (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.20.1-2ubuntu1 => 1.20.1-2ubuntu2] (ubuntu-mate, ubuntukylin, xubuntu) | 21:48 | |
| acheronuk | slangasek: we still have sddm starting with a minimum VT7. I guess your new ubiquity version will not like that? | 21:50 |
| * tsimonq2 volunteers to fix SDDM if that's the problem. | 21:50 | |
| slangasek | acheronuk: I don't expect sddm to care. It just means that if you run ubiquity-dm in 'maybe' mode, then choose 'try', you'll have a VT switch | 21:51 |
| slangasek | whereas since plymouth AFAIK is across the board on vt1 now, there's no advantage to starting ubiquity-dm on vt7 | 21:51 |
| tsimonq2 | slangasek: This commit was spotted earlier: https://packaging.neon.kde.org/3rdparty/sddm.git/commit/?h=Neon/unstable_bionic&id=4567d3f85cfc5ba0a594f4b5c547311be3275302 | 21:52 |
| tsimonq2 | We might need to cherry-pick it? | 21:52 |
| acheronuk | slangasek: well, I just rolled our own Kubuntu CI iso image, and the try/install screen now crashes and dumps you into the live session on VT7 | 21:52 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: flashplugin-nonfree (bionic-proposed/multiverse) [29.0.0.113ubuntu1 => 29.0.0.140ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 21:52 | |
| acheronuk | so I'm jumping the gun on our daily iso build right now to test | 21:53 |
| slangasek | acheronuk: I don't know of any reason why this change would cause it to crash. Where can I poke at your image? | 21:53 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted flashplugin-nonfree [source] (bionic-proposed) [29.0.0.140ubuntu1] | 21:53 | |
| acheronuk | slangasek: http://kci.pangea.pub/images/iso_bionic_stable_amd64/current/ | 21:53 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-initial-setup (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.28.0-2ubuntu1 => 3.28.0-2ubuntu2] (ubuntugnome) | 21:54 | |
| acheronuk | it is one with CI packages (though stable branches) so it could be something else causing the crash | 21:55 |
| acheronuk | but I tested as it's one I can just spin up | 21:55 |
| acheronuk | tsimonq2: yeah. if that commit is sane, may be worth taking | 21:56 |
| slangasek | acheronuk, tsimonq2: yes, that sddm commit looks reasonable to take, but I also don't want to have flavors individually chasing down post-beta damage caused by a change that shouldn't have broken things; so I'm still going to dig on that side | 22:01 |
| tsimonq2 | slangasek: OK. | 22:02 |
| tsimonq2 | Thank you. | 22:02 |
| slangasek | doko: the openfoam/ppc64el build failure is confusing me, I have failed to reproduce it on diamond but it's reproducible in LP. does this smell like an OOM to you? | 22:03 |
| doko | priotized https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/test-rebuild-20180408/+build/14609269 and https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/test-rebuild-20180408-gcc8/+build/14704137 | 22:09 |
| doko | let's see | 22:09 |
| doko | slangasek: how much memory are the cc1plus processes consuming? | 22:10 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: buildbot (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.1-3ubuntu2 => 1.1.1-3ubuntu3] (no packageset) | 22:13 | |
| slangasek | doko: don't know. what's a good way to check the high watermark on this? | 22:14 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted buildbot [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.1-3ubuntu3] | 22:14 | |
| doko | watching top? | 22:14 |
| doko | if I would know a better way, I would like to see that printed out at the end of each build in the log | 22:15 |
| tsimonq2 | You mean htop? :P | 22:17 |
| * tsimonq2 runs | 22:17 | |
| wxl | neither of them will help with logging | 22:18 |
| doko | build failure with gcc8, so that doesn't help | 22:20 |
| doko | I love that gnome-shell-pomodoro autopkg test ... running for 93h now | 22:21 |
| doko | slangasek: I removed the primer3 binaries on s390x, however the autopkg tests are still run. what am I doing wrong? | 22:23 |
| slangasek | doko: cc1plus looks to be around 425MB each for openfoam, but who knows if that's the highwater mark. and maybe I should just speculatively change it to -O2 | 22:27 |
| slangasek | doko: primer3> probably the problem is that there are arch: all packages from the source, so it probably needs hinted badtest | 22:27 |
| acheronuk | slangasek: real Kubuntu iso respin also crashes straight to live session: http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/kubuntu/daily-live/20180410.1/ | 22:28 |
| acheronuk | caveat - that is in a VM | 22:28 |
| acheronuk | slangasek: this morning's iso works fine | 22:29 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: vim (bionic-proposed/main) [2:8.0.1401-1ubuntu3 => 2:8.0.1453-1ubuntu1] (core) (sync) | 22:30 | |
| doko | mdeslaur: your patch sync ftbfs | 22:31 |
| slangasek | one the words in the previous line is a package name | 22:31 |
| doko | =) | 22:32 |
| doko | why can't I give back update-notifier on armhf? "You submitted an invalid request: update-notifier/3.190 is not published in bionic" | 22:33 |
| slangasek | doko: an unusual error message; what I see is update-notifier 3.190 is built on armhf | 22:36 |
| LocutusOfBorg | oh I was looking at the same update-notifier message | 22:44 |
| acheronuk | slangasek: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/4bjQgJg9pv/ | 22:45 |
| doko | slangasek: re openfoam, you could limit the parallel build to two cpus as well | 22:46 |
| LocutusOfBorg | doko, I don't know how you did fix aseba, but the reason for the failure were in enki-aseba being qt4, so I reverted your upload and "fixed" it (actually your change has been subsequent to enki-aseba sync/publish, this is maybe why you thought the linking order was a fix?) | 22:46 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-initial-setup (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.28.0-2ubuntu1 => 3.28.0-2ubuntu3] (ubuntugnome) | 22:48 | |
| slangasek | doko: lala, just found this in debian/rules: # Limit parallel build to 3 processes on Ubuntu amd64 and arm64 | 22:54 |
| doko | slangasek: seriously, we should fix the buildd infrastructure, not the packaging | 22:55 |
| slangasek | we don't agree that this is broken infrastructure | 22:55 |
| doko | if you think that building with the same limits (or even lower ones) as four or five years ago ... | 22:56 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openfoam (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.1+dfsg1-1build2 => 4.1+dfsg1-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 22:56 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openfoam [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.1+dfsg1-1ubuntu1] | 22:57 | |
| mdeslaur | doko: UGH, thanks. | 22:59 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (bionic-proposed/main) [2.518 => 2.519] (desktop-core) | 23:00 | |
| tsimonq2 | Somebody could sync nodejs if they wanted to. Won't be me. :P | 23:03 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.519] | 23:04 | |
| doko | tsimonq2: are you comitted to fix all the autopkg test failures? | 23:05 |
| tsimonq2 | doko: As I said, won't be me. :P | 23:05 |
| * doko curses the person who synced that from experimental | 23:06 | |
| nacc | that would be tsimonq2, no? :) | 23:08 |
| slangasek | acheronuk: and that failure is consistently reproducible on boot? any indication of why the X server died? | 23:08 |
| tsimonq2 | nacc: shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh | 23:08 |
| tsimonq2 | I knew soon after the fact that it was a *horrible* mistake. | 23:08 |
| nacc | tsimonq2: it doesn't appear to be that important to sync | 23:08 |
| slangasek | tsimonq2: did you learn not to do it for next time? ;) | 23:09 |
| nacc | heh | 23:09 |
| tsimonq2 | nacc, slangasek: This is why I'm casually suggesting it over IRC, so someone *else* can deal with the absolute mess that nodejs is. | 23:09 |
| tsimonq2 | :P | 23:09 |
| slangasek | tsimonq2: I mean about not starting /new/ transitions for language ecosystems by syncing from experimental | 23:10 |
| slangasek | :) | 23:10 |
| acheronuk | slangasek: so far has crashed every time. that is all the output in syslog just before and after | 23:10 |
| tsimonq2 | slangasek: Yes, that. ;) | 23:10 |
| slangasek | acheronuk: there may be X logs separately; or systemd journal entries for the ubiquity service (journalctl --no-pager -lu ubiquity.service) | 23:11 |
| tsimonq2 | slangasek: I learned that next time I sync something starting a new transition, it should be in Gianfranco's name. :P | 23:13 |
| tsimonq2 | Imeanwhat. | 23:13 |
| tsimonq2 | (I'm kidding, of course. :P) | 23:13 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: patch (bionic-proposed/main) [2.7.6-2 => 2.7.6-2ubuntu1] (core) | 23:14 | |
| acheronuk | slangasek: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/WQh9z3Fzh5/ | 23:16 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gnome-initial-setup [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.0-2ubuntu2] | 23:16 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted vim [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2:8.0.1453-1ubuntu1] | 23:16 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted patch [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.7.6-2ubuntu1] | 23:16 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ukui-session-manager [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.2-0ubuntu1] | 23:16 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted atril [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.20.1-2ubuntu2] | 23:17 | |
| slangasek | acheronuk: so if you, say, try to run 'service ubiquity start', what happens? Is it reproducible post-boot? | 23:17 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-mate-settings [source] (bionic-proposed) [18.04.15] | 23:17 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mate-desktop [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.20.1-1ubuntu2] | 23:18 | |
| acheronuk | slangasek: seems to fail the same | 23:21 |
| doko | slangasek: please could you consider overriding the snapd/i386 autopkg test failure? according to #snappy that doesn't appear in their own testing, and it looks completely unrelated to git | 23:21 |
| slangasek | acheronuk: well good news, that means you should be able to debug it and get some logs then? :) you probably want to 'service sddm stop' before you try to get any logs though, otherwise you could have conflicts with the already-running X server | 23:25 |
| acheronuk | slangasek: if I 'sudo service sddm stop' then 'sudo service ubiquity start' ubiquity-dm starts without a crash | 23:27 |
| acheronuk | and I land on the try/install screen | 23:28 |
| tsimonq2 | slangasek: Spanish is messed up as well: bug 1754646. | 23:32 |
| ubot5` | bug 1754646 in debian-installer (Ubuntu Bionic) "Texts in the dialogue in Swedish is faulty in Lubuntu alternate Bionic beta 1" [Critical,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1754646 | 23:32 |
| slangasek | acheronuk: hmph ok | 23:33 |
| slangasek | acheronuk: I think I'll need to boot it here to get a handle on it | 23:33 |
| slangasek | (as opposed to just digging around on the fs) | 23:33 |
| acheronuk | slangasek: now, while I was doing all this, I applied that sddm VT change, uploaded a package to our Kubuntu CI PPA, and rolled a new iso when it published | 23:33 |
| slangasek | tsimonq2: yes, it's a language-agnostic bug | 23:34 |
| acheronuk | which now boots ok! | 23:34 |
| acheronuk | this could of course be completely coincidence! | 23:34 |
| acheronuk | but..... | 23:34 |
| tsimonq2 | slangasek: OK. | 23:34 |
| acheronuk | slangasek: it would be handing is we could do test rebuilds of official images, adding a PPA source with a test package like new sddm | 23:40 |
| acheronuk | s/handing/handy | 23:40 |
| doko | Laney: there is a doc-rfc autopkg test failure blocking your poppler upload | 23:40 |
| acheronuk | slangasek: 12:40 am here, so I am going to have to give up for the day shortly | 23:42 |
| acheronuk | tsimonq2: if a new sddm upload can fix this, can you sort that please? | 23:43 |
| tsimonq2 | acheronuk: Affirmative. | 23:43 |
| acheronuk | tsimonq2: in fact, if the change is good going forward, maybe just do it anyway | 23:44 |
| tsimonq2 | acheronuk: ok | 23:45 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-software (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.0-0ubuntu7 => 3.28.1-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) | 23:52 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!