[01:05] I can haz a look at that [01:07] oh, cute, and the enddianness failure on s390x... [02:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: clamsmtp (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.10-16ubuntu1 => 1.10-17ubuntu1] (no packageset) [02:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted clamsmtp [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.10-17ubuntu1] [05:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pocl (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1-4 => 1.1-5] (no packageset) (sync) [05:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pocl [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.1-5] [05:22] doko: solfege build failure is a segfault within initialization of /usr/lib/python3.6/lib-dynload/readline.cpython-36m-x86_64-linux-gnu.so, which seems somewhat improbable... [05:46] doko: you're removing packages from -proposed that are not buggy and could become installable again if their dependencies were fixed in Debian? [06:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: psortb (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.0.5+dfsg-1 => 3.0.5+dfsg-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) [06:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted psortb [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.0.5+dfsg-1ubuntu1] [06:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: psortb [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.0.5+dfsg-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) [06:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: primer3 (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-1 => 2.4.0-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) [06:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted primer3 [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-1ubuntu1] [06:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kdelibs4support [source] (bionic-proposed) [5.44.0-0ubuntu2] [06:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-session [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.0-0ubuntu4] [06:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted poppler [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.62.0-2ubuntu1] [06:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-session [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.0-0ubuntu4] (ubuntu-desktop) [06:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-session [s390x] (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.0-0ubuntu4] (ubuntu-desktop) [06:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-session [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.0-0ubuntu4] (ubuntu-desktop) [06:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-session [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.0-0ubuntu4] (ubuntu-desktop) [06:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pymoc (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.5.0-2 => 0.5.0-2ubuntu1] (no packageset) [06:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pymoc [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.5.0-2ubuntu1] [06:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-session [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.0-0ubuntu4] (ubuntu-desktop) [06:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-session [armhf] (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.0-0ubuntu4] (ubuntu-desktop) [06:56] morning. could the kdeconnect FFe in unapproved be let through if convenient. thanks [06:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libinput (bionic-proposed/main) [1.10.3-2 => 1.10.4-1] (desktop-core) (sync) [07:03] Looking [07:04] acheronuk: uh, did you put the wrong bug number for kdeconnect? Since the bug seems to point to krita [07:05] acheronuk: if that's indeed a mistake, please re-upload with the same version number, I'll reject this one and approve the other [07:05] sil2100: could be. I had both open in tabs yesterday. thanks [07:05] acheronuk: I'll look at the bug then ;) [07:08] acheronuk: also, the kubuntu-settings upload - it sounds like it changes visible parts of the UI? I guess it would need an UIFe? [07:08] (correct me if I'm wrong) [07:11] trivially, and I thought that was to ensure that UI did not change for people doing documentation for main ubuntu. this has zero impact on those issues [07:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kdeconnect (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.2.1-0ubuntu2 => 1.3.0-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu) [07:16] sil2100: we certainly have no documentation that promise whether we have that small separator or not [07:16] acheronuk: ok, I must say I am not sure about flavour-specific changes myself [07:16] So yeah, I guess we'll just slip it in [07:17] it is sort of a grey area. or at least debatable [07:17] thank. if it had been a bigger change affecting other things, I would have FFed or asked in advance [07:18] *thanks [07:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected kdeconnect [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.3.0-0ubuntu1] [07:18] (also, basically since you're from the Kubuntu team I'd anyway ACK your UIFe request ;) ) [07:19] Approved both, yw! [07:19] sil2100: did you see slangasek's comment on this yesterday? [07:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cups [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.2.7-1ubuntu2] [07:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kubuntu-settings [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:18.04ubuntu11] [07:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kdeconnect [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.3.0-0ubuntu1] [07:19] regards kdeconnect ffe [07:19] [18:36] acheronuk: FFe approved. Historically, flavors were allowed latitude in self-managing FFes for packages that were core parts of their image and that only they had seeded; perhaps we should discuss (but not just at this moment) getting back to that state, so that we don't need to be a bottleneck for you [07:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted partman-md [sync] (bionic-proposed) [86] [07:21] sil2100: anyway. thank you :) [07:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted budgie-desktop-environment [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.9.8] [07:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted budgie-extras [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.4.4-0ubuntu1] [07:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted hyphen-ru [source] (bionic-proposed) [20030310-1ubuntu3] [07:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted myspell-hr [source] (bionic-proposed) [20060617-2.4ubuntu1] [07:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-getting-started-docs [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.1-0ubuntu1] [07:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-user-docs [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.1-0ubuntu1] [07:23] acheronuk: I guess I didn't :) Yeah, I'd really like this to be made clear somewhere so that we don't cause unnecessary delays here and there [07:23] +1 there [07:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-user-docs [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.1-0ubuntu1] (personal-gunnarhj, ubuntu-desktop) [08:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pillow (bionic-proposed/main) [5.0.0-1 => 5.1.0-1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) (sync) [08:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-session [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.0-0ubuntu4] [08:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-session [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.0-0ubuntu4] [08:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-session [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.0-0ubuntu4] [08:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-user-docs [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.1-0ubuntu1] [08:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted psortb [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [3.0.5+dfsg-1ubuntu1] [08:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-session [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.0-0ubuntu4] [08:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-session [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.0-0ubuntu4] [08:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-session [i386] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.0-0ubuntu4] [08:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pdbg [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [1.0-1ubuntu1] [08:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-boxes [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.1-1] [08:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pillow [sync] (bionic-proposed) [5.1.0-1] [08:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libinput [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.10.4-1] [08:57] slangasek: why would you want to keep buildN packages without binaries in proposed? [08:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: enki-aseba (bionic-proposed/universe) [1:1.6.0-3 => 1:1.6.0-5] (no packageset) (sync) [08:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted enki-aseba [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1:1.6.0-5] [09:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-disk-utility (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.0-1ubuntu1 => 3.28.1-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) [09:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ukui-session-manager (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.1-0ubuntu1 => 1.1.2-0ubuntu1] (ubuntukylin) [09:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ristretto (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.8.2-1 => 0.8.2-1ubuntu1] (ubuntustudio, xubuntu) [10:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pulseaudio (xenial-proposed/main) [1:8.0-0ubuntu3.8 => 1:8.0-0ubuntu3.9] (core) [10:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: python-motor (bionic-proposed/primary) [1.2.1-1build1] [10:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mongodb (bionic-proposed/universe) [1:3.4.7-1ubuntu4 => 1:3.4.14-3] (mozilla) (sync) [10:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-motor [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.1-1build1] [10:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-motor [amd64] (bionic-proposed/none) [1.2.1-1build1] (no packageset) [10:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-motor [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.1-1build1] [11:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: synfigstudio (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.2.1-0ubuntu3 => 1.2.1-0.1] (ubuntustudio) (sync) [11:09] can you please accept mongodb so I can upload my merge without the orig tarball? it timeouts [11:10] it has an FFe for 3.6 already acked [11:10] I'm just uploading a 3.4 merge in the meanwhile, to unblock python-motor [11:14] LocutusOfBorg: please talk to rbasak about mongodb work. I think there was a reason he wasn't just syncing the Debian version yet [11:14] oh never mind, I see there was already discussion [12:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mongodb (bionic-proposed/universe) [1:3.4.7-1ubuntu4 => 1:3.4.14-3ubuntu1] (mozilla) [12:36] hurray mongodb uploaded [12:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: r-cran-openssl (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0.1-1 => 1.0.1-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) [12:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted r-cran-openssl [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.1-1ubuntu1] [13:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openoffice.org-hyphenation-pl (bionic-proposed/main) [1:3.0a-4 => 1:3.0a-4ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) [13:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-report (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0.5 => 1.0.6] (no packageset) [13:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-report [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.6] [14:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-report (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0.6 => 1.0.7] (no packageset) [14:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-report [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.7] [14:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (bionic-proposed/partner) [1:20180313.1-0ubuntu1 => 1:20180410.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) [14:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libreoffice (bionic-proposed/main) [1:6.0.2-0ubuntu1 => 1:6.0.3-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) [14:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-session (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.0-0ubuntu4 => 3.28.1-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) [14:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libreoffice-l10n (bionic-proposed/main) [1:6.0.2-0ubuntu1 => 1:6.0.3-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) [14:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: remmina (bionic-proposed/main) [1.2.0-rcgit.27+dfsg-4ubuntu1 => 1.2.0-rcgit.29+dfsg-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) [14:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: r-cran-future (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.7.0-1 => 1.7.0-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) [14:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted r-cran-future [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.7.0-1ubuntu1] [14:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mongodb [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1:3.4.14-3] [14:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted synfigstudio [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.1-0.1] [14:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mongodb [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:3.4.14-3ubuntu1] [14:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fastnetmon (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.3+dfsg-6 => 1.1.3+dfsg-6build1] (no packageset) [14:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fastnetmon [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.3+dfsg-6build1] [15:07] doko: I'm not talking about buildN packages. You removed e.g. grafana-zabbix, which is not buggy but depends on a buggy package. If grafana gets fixed in Debian, it will be synced and grafana-zabbix will become migratable with no source changes; but now grafana-zabbix is gone, and won't reappear automatically when grafana is fixed [15:08] FYI, I'm currently deploying a new Launchpad revision that adds InRelease etc. to by-hash directories [15:08] It looks fine in tests, and I'll keep an eye on it, but please let me know if you see weirdness in that general area [15:10] ahh, I see. good, then looking at the new upstream =) [15:11] sil2100, last subiquity respin fails to build =( http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/cd-build-logs/ubuntu-server/bionic/daily-live-20180410.1.log -> no live filesystems build succeeded [15:11] and diggin into there https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/bionic/ubuntu-server-live/+build/129016 [15:11] in https://launchpadlibrarian.net/364257125/buildlog_ubuntu_bionic_amd64_ubuntu-server-live_BUILDING.txt.gz shows that [15:11] + SNAPPY_STORE_NO_CDN=1 snap download core [15:11] 2018/04/10 12:47:07.907440 cmd.go:156: cannot read /proc/self/exe: readlink /proc/self/exe: no such file or directory [15:12] is this known? or need debugging / escalating? i guess something changed and snapd is no longer a happy camper inside lxd inside launchpad builder? [15:14] doko: I don't care strongly about grafana-zabbix, but I've been avoiding removing such packages from -proposed as a policy [15:14] has all of zabbix been upgraded to support systemd as pid1? at one point it was upstart-only on ubuntu, and thus not working at all, and I thought all of zabbix needs removing [15:20] xnox: hmmm [15:20] xnox: looking, strange as I started it through nusakan so I'd expect it to work - let me see what I actually run [15:21] Ah [15:21] heh [15:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: plasma-framework (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.44.0-0ubuntu2 => 5.44.0-0ubuntu3] (kubuntu) [15:22] I tested that patch for upstream code review, so please let through when convenient ^^^ [15:23] xnox: no idea why this is now failing and was not failing 7 hours ago, I guess you'll have to ask around ;) [15:24] xnox: no clue about that, and again I don't care about this particular package ;) I just care about knowing what rules we should follow when keeping or removing packages from -proposed, since that has implications for them coming back later [15:28] sil2100, or i guess the actuall error is: [15:28] xnox> error: received an unexpected http response code (503) when trying to download https://public.apps.ubuntu.com/download-origin/local/99T7MUlRhtI3U0QFgl5mXXESAiSwt776_4206.snap?sig=Ijk5VDdNVWxSaHRJM1UwUUZnbDVtWFhFU0FpU3d0Nzc2XzQyMDYuc25hcCI.Da44wA.PqfN1fhAv3tZT-1qaRnz5239kxg [15:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity (bionic-proposed/main) [18.04.4 => 18.04.5] (core) [15:34] jibel: ^ [15:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: aseba (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.6.0-3 => 1.6.0-3ubuntu1] (no packageset) [15:36] slangasek: ubiquity in unapproved would need a review/approval if you have the time; this is the upload for your TTY fixes, as well as the zram fix [15:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted aseba [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.6.0-3ubuntu1] [15:38] cyphermox: accepted, thanks [15:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubiquity [source] (bionic-proposed) [18.04.5] [15:40] cyphermox, thanks [15:48] ta [15:59] is OpenGL supposed to work on arm64? [16:02] would someone please 'force-badtest nanopolish/0.9.0-1/arm64 nanopolish/0.9.0-1/armhf nanopolish/0.9.0-1/ppc64el nanopolish/0.9.0-1/s390x' ? it is only built for amd64 and i386 now [16:04] doko, is context enki-aseba aseba? debian enabled OpenGL with latest qt in arm64, ubuntu didn't, probably because qt in bionic is too old? /cc tsimonq2 [16:05] doko: "ish". Qt is built against GLES instead of GL, so it has a similar set of qt-related ANAIS as armhf [16:06] aseba doesn't detect a working qt on arm64 [16:06] LocutusOfBorg: Ubuntu hasn't enabled OpenGL in arm64 specifically because OpenGLES is considered the more interesting target for Ubuntu arm64 targets [16:06] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtbase-opensource-src/5.9.4+dfsg-0ubuntu4 [16:06] LocutusOfBorg: unless you're saying that the new Qt can somehow do both [16:06] this? :) [16:06] slangasek, I vaguely remember something like this, but please don't take my words seriously [16:07] (OpenGL support on arm64 in Qt in Debian is not new) [16:07] this is why I cc'd tsimonq2 [16:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: a7xpg (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.11.dfsg1-9build1 => 0.11.dfsg1-9ubuntu1] (no packageset) [16:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted a7xpg [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.11.dfsg1-9ubuntu1] [16:15] * tsimonq2 bounces to mitya57 [16:16] I still need to learn why the graphics stack is the way it is irt arm and Qt. [16:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-meta-gcp (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0.1003.4 => 4.15.0.1003.5] (kernel) [16:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-meta-gcp [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0.1003.5] [16:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wine-development (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.2-1 => 3.5-1] (no packageset) (sync) [16:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wine-development [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.5-1] [16:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: simplestreams (artful-proposed/main) [0.1.0~bzr450-0ubuntu1 => 0.1.0~bzr450-0ubuntu1.1] (ubuntu-server) [16:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dell-recovery (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.57 => 1.58] (no packageset) [16:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: simplestreams (xenial-proposed/main) [0.1.0~bzr426-0ubuntu1.2 => 0.1.0~bzr426-0ubuntu1.3] (ubuntu-server) [16:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dell-recovery [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.58] [16:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pymoc (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.5.0-2ubuntu1 => 0.5.0-2ubuntu2] (no packageset) [16:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pymoc [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.5.0-2ubuntu2] [16:52] apw, please see https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/usbip/+bug/1723717 [16:52] Ubuntu bug 1723717 in linux (Ubuntu) "Please remove from archives: usbip & usbip-source" [Undecided,New] [16:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: patch (bionic-proposed/main) [2.7.6-1 => 2.7.6-2] (core) (sync) [17:13] doko, tsimonq2: in Debian, aseba FTBFS with OpenGL ES too (see armhf). The only difference with Ubuntu is that we use OpenGL ES also on arm64. [17:14] This upload is new, maybe the maintainer will fix that FTBFS soon. [17:30] ok, then I'll remove the binary on arm64 [17:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libreoffice-l10n [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:6.0.3-0ubuntu1] [17:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openoffice.org-hyphenation-pl [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:3.0a-4ubuntu1] [17:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libreoffice [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:6.0.3-0ubuntu1] [17:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted patch [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.7.6-2] [17:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: buildbot (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.1-3 => 1.1.1-3ubuntu1] (no packageset) [17:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted buildbot [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.1-3ubuntu1] [17:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ristretto [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.8.2-1ubuntu1] [17:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-session [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.1-0ubuntu1] [18:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: vte2.91 (bionic-proposed/main) [0.52.0-1ubuntu2 => 0.52.1-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) [18:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: glib2.0 (bionic-proposed/main) [2.56.0-4ubuntu1 => 2.56.1-2ubuntu1] (core) [18:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: aseba (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.6.0-3ubuntu1 => 1.6.0-3.1~build1] (no packageset) [18:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted aseba [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.6.0-3.1~build1] [18:15] hi. could someone NACK the artful and xenial uploads of simplestreams please ? [18:15] smoser: are you going to upload again? [18:16] well, wolsen requested another cherry-pick [18:16] i've updated the merge prposal to have those [18:16] smoser: if in unapproved, you can re-upload the same version [18:16] i can, yes. but just more clear if we NACK what is there. [18:16] smoser: as the version hasn't been burned yet, and the SRU team should review the latest upload [18:17] but yeah. not burned. [18:18] smoser: yeah i agree with you, just not necessarily blocking you either [18:18] right [18:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-terminal (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.0-1ubuntu1 => 3.28.1-1ubuntu1] (desktop-core) [18:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: jellyfish (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.2.8-3 => 2.2.8-3build1] (no packageset) [18:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: primer3 (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-1ubuntu1 => 2.4.0-1ubuntu2] (no packageset) [18:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted jellyfish [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.2.8-3build1] [18:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted primer3 [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-1ubuntu2] [18:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:20180410.1-0ubuntu1] [18:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (trusty-proposed/partner) [1:20180313.1-0ubuntu0.14.04.1 => 1:20180410.1-0ubuntu0.14.04.1] (no packageset) [18:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (xenial-proposed/partner) [1:20180313.1-0ubuntu0.16.04.1 => 1:20180410.1-0ubuntu0.16.04.1] (no packageset) [18:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:20180410.1-0ubuntu0.16.04.1] [18:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (trusty-proposed) [1:20180410.1-0ubuntu0.14.04.1] [18:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-calculator (bionic-proposed/main) [1:3.28.0-1ubuntu1 => 1:3.28.1-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) [20:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ruby-graphviz (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.2.3-1 => 1.2.3-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) [20:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ruby-graphviz [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.3-1ubuntu1] [20:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: buildbot (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.1-3ubuntu1 => 1.1.1-3ubuntu2] (no packageset) [20:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted buildbot [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.1-3ubuntu2] [21:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: software-properties (bionic-proposed/main) [0.96.24.27 => 0.96.24.28] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) [21:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-mate-settings (bionic-proposed/universe) [18.04.14 => 18.04.15] (ubuntu-mate) [21:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mate-desktop (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.20.1-1ubuntu1 => 1.20.1-1ubuntu2] (ubuntu-mate, ubuntukylin, xubuntu) [21:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-builder (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.28.0-1ubuntu1 => 3.28.1-1ubuntu1] (desktop-extra) [21:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: atril (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.20.1-2ubuntu1 => 1.20.1-2ubuntu2] (ubuntu-mate, ubuntukylin, xubuntu) [21:50] slangasek: we still have sddm starting with a minimum VT7. I guess your new ubiquity version will not like that? [21:50] * tsimonq2 volunteers to fix SDDM if that's the problem. [21:51] acheronuk: I don't expect sddm to care. It just means that if you run ubiquity-dm in 'maybe' mode, then choose 'try', you'll have a VT switch [21:51] whereas since plymouth AFAIK is across the board on vt1 now, there's no advantage to starting ubiquity-dm on vt7 [21:52] slangasek: This commit was spotted earlier: https://packaging.neon.kde.org/3rdparty/sddm.git/commit/?h=Neon/unstable_bionic&id=4567d3f85cfc5ba0a594f4b5c547311be3275302 [21:52] We might need to cherry-pick it? [21:52] slangasek: well, I just rolled our own Kubuntu CI iso image, and the try/install screen now crashes and dumps you into the live session on VT7 [21:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: flashplugin-nonfree (bionic-proposed/multiverse) [29.0.0.113ubuntu1 => 29.0.0.140ubuntu1] (no packageset) [21:53] so I'm jumping the gun on our daily iso build right now to test [21:53] acheronuk: I don't know of any reason why this change would cause it to crash. Where can I poke at your image? [21:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted flashplugin-nonfree [source] (bionic-proposed) [29.0.0.140ubuntu1] [21:53] slangasek: http://kci.pangea.pub/images/iso_bionic_stable_amd64/current/ [21:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-initial-setup (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.28.0-2ubuntu1 => 3.28.0-2ubuntu2] (ubuntugnome) [21:55] it is one with CI packages (though stable branches) so it could be something else causing the crash [21:55] but I tested as it's one I can just spin up [21:56] tsimonq2: yeah. if that commit is sane, may be worth taking [22:01] acheronuk, tsimonq2: yes, that sddm commit looks reasonable to take, but I also don't want to have flavors individually chasing down post-beta damage caused by a change that shouldn't have broken things; so I'm still going to dig on that side [22:02] slangasek: OK. [22:02] Thank you. [22:03] doko: the openfoam/ppc64el build failure is confusing me, I have failed to reproduce it on diamond but it's reproducible in LP. does this smell like an OOM to you? [22:09] priotized https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/test-rebuild-20180408/+build/14609269 and https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/test-rebuild-20180408-gcc8/+build/14704137 [22:09] let's see [22:10] slangasek: how much memory are the cc1plus processes consuming? [22:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: buildbot (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.1-3ubuntu2 => 1.1.1-3ubuntu3] (no packageset) [22:14] doko: don't know. what's a good way to check the high watermark on this? [22:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted buildbot [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.1-3ubuntu3] [22:14] watching top? [22:15] if I would know a better way, I would like to see that printed out at the end of each build in the log [22:17] You mean htop? :P [22:17] * tsimonq2 runs [22:18] neither of them will help with logging [22:20] build failure with gcc8, so that doesn't help [22:21] I love that gnome-shell-pomodoro autopkg test ... running for 93h now [22:23] slangasek: I removed the primer3 binaries on s390x, however the autopkg tests are still run. what am I doing wrong? [22:27] doko: cc1plus looks to be around 425MB each for openfoam, but who knows if that's the highwater mark. and maybe I should just speculatively change it to -O2 [22:27] doko: primer3> probably the problem is that there are arch: all packages from the source, so it probably needs hinted badtest [22:28] slangasek: real Kubuntu iso respin also crashes straight to live session: http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/kubuntu/daily-live/20180410.1/ [22:28] caveat - that is in a VM [22:29] slangasek: this morning's iso works fine [22:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: vim (bionic-proposed/main) [2:8.0.1401-1ubuntu3 => 2:8.0.1453-1ubuntu1] (core) (sync) [22:31] mdeslaur: your patch sync ftbfs [22:31] one the words in the previous line is a package name [22:32] =) [22:33] why can't I give back update-notifier on armhf? "You submitted an invalid request: update-notifier/3.190 is not published in bionic" [22:36] doko: an unusual error message; what I see is update-notifier 3.190 is built on armhf [22:44] oh I was looking at the same update-notifier message [22:45] slangasek: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/4bjQgJg9pv/ [22:46] slangasek: re openfoam, you could limit the parallel build to two cpus as well [22:46] doko, I don't know how you did fix aseba, but the reason for the failure were in enki-aseba being qt4, so I reverted your upload and "fixed" it (actually your change has been subsequent to enki-aseba sync/publish, this is maybe why you thought the linking order was a fix?) [22:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-initial-setup (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.28.0-2ubuntu1 => 3.28.0-2ubuntu3] (ubuntugnome) [22:54] doko: lala, just found this in debian/rules: # Limit parallel build to 3 processes on Ubuntu amd64 and arm64 [22:55] slangasek: seriously, we should fix the buildd infrastructure, not the packaging [22:55] we don't agree that this is broken infrastructure [22:56] if you think that building with the same limits (or even lower ones) as four or five years ago ... [22:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openfoam (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.1+dfsg1-1build2 => 4.1+dfsg1-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) [22:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openfoam [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.1+dfsg1-1ubuntu1] [22:59] doko: UGH, thanks. [23:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (bionic-proposed/main) [2.518 => 2.519] (desktop-core) [23:03] Somebody could sync nodejs if they wanted to. Won't be me. :P [23:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.519] [23:05] tsimonq2: are you comitted to fix all the autopkg test failures? [23:05] doko: As I said, won't be me. :P [23:06] * doko curses the person who synced that from experimental [23:08] that would be tsimonq2, no? :) [23:08] acheronuk: and that failure is consistently reproducible on boot? any indication of why the X server died? [23:08] nacc: shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh [23:08] I knew soon after the fact that it was a *horrible* mistake. [23:08] tsimonq2: it doesn't appear to be that important to sync [23:09] tsimonq2: did you learn not to do it for next time? ;) [23:09] heh [23:09] nacc, slangasek: This is why I'm casually suggesting it over IRC, so someone *else* can deal with the absolute mess that nodejs is. [23:09] :P [23:10] tsimonq2: I mean about not starting /new/ transitions for language ecosystems by syncing from experimental [23:10] :) [23:10] slangasek: so far has crashed every time. that is all the output in syslog just before and after [23:10] slangasek: Yes, that. ;) [23:11] acheronuk: there may be X logs separately; or systemd journal entries for the ubiquity service (journalctl --no-pager -lu ubiquity.service) [23:13] slangasek: I learned that next time I sync something starting a new transition, it should be in Gianfranco's name. :P [23:13] Imeanwhat. [23:13] (I'm kidding, of course. :P) [23:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: patch (bionic-proposed/main) [2.7.6-2 => 2.7.6-2ubuntu1] (core) [23:16] slangasek: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/WQh9z3Fzh5/ [23:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gnome-initial-setup [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.0-2ubuntu2] [23:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted vim [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2:8.0.1453-1ubuntu1] [23:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted patch [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.7.6-2ubuntu1] [23:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ukui-session-manager [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.2-0ubuntu1] [23:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted atril [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.20.1-2ubuntu2] [23:17] acheronuk: so if you, say, try to run 'service ubiquity start', what happens? Is it reproducible post-boot? [23:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-mate-settings [source] (bionic-proposed) [18.04.15] [23:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mate-desktop [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.20.1-1ubuntu2] [23:21] slangasek: seems to fail the same [23:21] slangasek: please could you consider overriding the snapd/i386 autopkg test failure? according to #snappy that doesn't appear in their own testing, and it looks completely unrelated to git [23:25] acheronuk: well good news, that means you should be able to debug it and get some logs then? :) you probably want to 'service sddm stop' before you try to get any logs though, otherwise you could have conflicts with the already-running X server [23:27] slangasek: if I 'sudo service sddm stop' then 'sudo service ubiquity start' ubiquity-dm starts without a crash [23:28] and I land on the try/install screen [23:32] slangasek: Spanish is messed up as well: bug 1754646. [23:32] bug 1754646 in debian-installer (Ubuntu Bionic) "Texts in the dialogue in Swedish is faulty in Lubuntu alternate Bionic beta 1" [Critical,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1754646 [23:33] acheronuk: hmph ok [23:33] acheronuk: I think I'll need to boot it here to get a handle on it [23:33] (as opposed to just digging around on the fs) [23:33] slangasek: now, while I was doing all this, I applied that sddm VT change, uploaded a package to our Kubuntu CI PPA, and rolled a new iso when it published [23:34] tsimonq2: yes, it's a language-agnostic bug [23:34] which now boots ok! [23:34] this could of course be completely coincidence! [23:34] but..... [23:34] slangasek: OK. [23:40] slangasek: it would be handing is we could do test rebuilds of official images, adding a PPA source with a test package like new sddm [23:40] s/handing/handy [23:40] Laney: there is a doc-rfc autopkg test failure blocking your poppler upload [23:42] slangasek: 12:40 am here, so I am going to have to give up for the day shortly [23:43] tsimonq2: if a new sddm upload can fix this, can you sort that please? [23:43] acheronuk: Affirmative. [23:44] tsimonq2: in fact, if the change is good going forward, maybe just do it anyway [23:45] acheronuk: ok [23:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-software (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.0-0ubuntu7 => 3.28.1-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)