/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2018/04/11/#ubuntu-release.txt

slangasekacheronuk, tsimonq2: ok, I think the regular dm and ubiquity having different opinions about which tty to run on may at least be contributing to the issue - in particular, I see that if display-manager doesn't Conflicts=getty@tty1.service, getty@tty1.service tries to start in parallel with ubiquity.service, which is going to be bad00:03
slangasekacheronuk, tsimonq2: so I think from the ubiquity side, we solve this by adding that Conflicts to ubiquity.service; but that sddm also changing would be sensible; I'll test the first part here00:03
tsimonq2slangasek: ack00:08
slangasektsimonq2: that worked on the first go00:10
slangasekso I'll push that change00:10
slangasek(for review, at least)00:10
tsimonq2ok00:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mate-settings-daemon (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.20.1-0ubuntu1 => 1.20.1-2ubuntu1] (ubuntu-mate)00:11
acheronukslangasek: thank you.00:13
acheronukgood night00:13
slangasekinfinity, cyphermox: one of you care to review https://code.launchpad.net/~vorlon/ubiquity/conflict-with-getty1/+merge/342977 ?00:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: buildbot (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.1-3ubuntu3 => 1.1.1-3ubuntu4] (no packageset)00:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted buildbot [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.1-3ubuntu4]00:19
dokowhat's wrong wih systemd on arm64?00:23
cyphermoxslangasek: yay00:28
cyphermoxslangasek: is your other MP, for regain_privileges(), ready too?00:29
cyphermoxinfinity wanted to have a look and better understand it00:29
slangasekcyphermox: I haven't gotten feedback yet on that one, I suggest leaving it00:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xubuntu-community-artwork (bionic-proposed/universe) [16.04.0 => 18.04.0] (ubuntustudio, xubuntu)00:53
slangasekdoko: why did primer3 need a no-change rebuild?01:13
dokoslangasek: I had the impression that this was needed to drop the s390x test rebuilds01:15
slangasekok01:15
slangasekit didn't drop them01:15
slangasek:)01:15
slangasekoh, test rebuilds01:15
slangasekso unrelated to the autopkgtests?01:16
dokono, I really mean autopkgtests01:18
slangasekok01:18
slangasekdoko: incidentally, Debian bug #850065 looks relevant on openfoam, apparently this package doesn't obey the build env's guidance around parallelization01:19
ubot5`Debian bug 850065 in src:openfoam "openfoam: Build runs way more parallel processes than specified by DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS" [Important,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/85006501:19
dokoslangasek: this is unrelated, caused by make 4.2. I removed that for Ubuntu proposed01:23
slangasekdoko: I don't think so?  That bug report is a year old01:24
dokohmm01:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (bionic-proposed/main) [18.2-4-g05926e48-0ubuntu1 => 18.2-4-g05926e48-0ubuntu2] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server)01:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: peony (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.0-0ubuntu1 => 1.1.1-0ubuntu1] (ubuntukylin)02:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (bionic-proposed) [18.2-4-g05926e48-0ubuntu2]02:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted peony [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.1-0ubuntu1]02:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mate-settings-daemon [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.20.1-2ubuntu1]02:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xubuntu-community-artwork [source] (bionic-proposed) [18.04.0]02:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xubuntu-community-artwork [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [18.04.0] (ubuntustudio, xubuntu)02:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xubuntu-community-artwork [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [18.04.0]02:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd-glib (bionic-proposed/main) [1.38-1 => 1.39-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)03:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: atf-allwinner (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0.apritzel.81-1 => 1.0.apritzel.81-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)04:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted atf-allwinner [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.apritzel.81-1ubuntu1]04:12
slangasekLocutusOfBorg: is rollup bootstrap still on your radar?  by grepping logs I found you asked for node-rollup-plugin-commonjs 9.0 to be kicked out of -proposed; is that still the right thing to do?04:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: atf-allwinner [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0.apritzel.81-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)04:15
slangasektsimonq2: any plans for telepathy-qt?04:21
=== maclin1 is now known as maclin
slangasek        uint64_t k1 = gu_le64(blocks[i]);04:41
slangasek // Block read - if your platform needs to do endian-swapping or can only04:41
slangasek // handle aligned reads, do the conversion here04:41
slangasekaligned reads, you do not understand them04:41
acheronukslangasek: is this possibly linked to the general (not ubiquity) switch to VT1? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/176288506:22
ubot5`Ubuntu bug 1762885 in sddm (Ubuntu) "SDDM fails to start on laptops modern NVidia cards" [Undecided,New]06:22
acheronukor just maybe general nvidia ****iness06:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (bionic-proposed/main) [2.519 => 2.520] (desktop-core)07:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: krita (bionic-proposed/universe) [1:4.0.0+dfsg-0ubuntu1 => 1:4.0.1+dfsg-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)07:25
Laneydoko: rfc thing> I know, I filed a bug and pinged Till about it, new ghostscript broke it08:03
LocutusOfBorgyes slangasek it is still the right thing, unfortunately08:08
LocutusOfBorgI could finish the bootstrap, but no change rebuilding the package ends to different/unworking content08:08
LocutusOfBorgso I don't want to do an archive publishing with something that starts from a "npm install" on my pc08:08
LocutusOfBorgso, kicking up commonjs will prevent this bug https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=89274208:09
ubot5`Debian bug 892742 in src:node-rollup "rollup FTBFS with node-rollup-plugin-commonjs 9.0" [Serious,Open]08:09
LocutusOfBorgbut we will stuck with: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=89213308:09
ubot5`Debian bug 892133 in node-rollup "node-rollup: does not work after a no-change rebuild (the one in the archive is not suitable for main?)" [Serious,Open]08:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: command-not-found (bionic-proposed/main) [18.04.0 => 18.04.1] (core)08:10
LocutusOfBorghello, wrt remmina in queue, upstream asked me to do the merge, they feel confident about the release, and they would appreciate it being part of bionic08:35
LocutusOfBorgwhile this is not a bug-fix only release, it is true that new features are related to "new plugins", without changing the actual code08:36
LocutusOfBorgand there is a serious ssh bug fixed in this release08:37
LocutusOfBorgwith lots of RDP crashes fixes, and some ubuntu patch merged upstream08:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected command-not-found [source] (bionic-proposed) [18.04.1]08:50
apw^ rejecting as there is some expected change which needs investigation08:50
LocutusOfBorgLaney, did you find the "hey can't retry failed update-notifier on armhf tests" written above? :)08:50
LocutusOfBorgmy mind is blowing because of that :D08:51
Laneyno08:51
Laneyweird though, that call is doing archive.getPublishedSources08:55
LocutusOfBorgrmadison shows it as published08:56
LocutusOfBorgalso, britney08:56
LocutusOfBorgare we somewhat confusing update-manager and update-notifier?08:58
LocutusOfBorgor... epoch issue?08:58
LocutusOfBorgoh I can schedule a test against 0.189 and not 0.19009:00
Laneyhttps://api.launchpad.net/1.0/ubuntu/+archive/primary?distro_series=https%3A%2F%2Fapi.launchpad.net%2F1.0%2Fubuntu%2Fbionic&version=3.190&status=Published&source_name=update-notifier&ws.op=getPublishedSources09:12
Laneythis is what we're hitting09:12
Laneywhat's wrong with that then?09:13
LocutusOfBorgYou submitted an invalid request: update-notifier/3.190 is not published in bionic09:14
LocutusOfBorgmaybe bionic-proposed?09:15
LocutusOfBorgoh, this works indeed https://api.launchpad.net/1.0/ubuntu/+archive/primary?distro_series=https%3A%2F%2Fapi.launchpad.net%2F1.0%2Fubuntu%2Fbionic&version=3.189&status=Published&source_name=update-notifier&ws.op=getPublishedSources09:15
Laneyyes, and if you remove the version it shows 3.19009:16
LocutusOfBorgmaybe publisher was killed while publishing and didn't retry to do something?09:16
Laneyso I need to understand what the problem is there09:16
cjwatsonbad serialisation09:18
cjwatsonyou're sending version as a float09:18
cjwatsonshould be version=%223.190%2209:18
cjwatsonotherwise it turns into 3.19 ...09:19
LocutusOfBorgLOOOOOOOOOOOOL09:19
LocutusOfBorggood catch! :)09:19
cjwatsonI guess you're constructing the query manually rather than using launchpadlib here?09:20
cjwatsonalso, you should really add &exact_match=true09:21
Laneyit's doing         if version is not None:09:21
Laney            req['version'] = version09:21
cjwatsoncan you point me to the code?09:21
Laneyhttps://git.launchpad.net/autopkgtest-cloud/tree/webcontrol/request/submit.py#n25609:21
cjwatsonright, so you're constructing the request yourself and not doing the marshalling properly09:22
cjwatsonlet me see where the canonical code for this is09:24
Laneycheers, didn't occur to me that this wasn't being treated as a string09:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (xenial-proposed/main) [2.31.2 => 2.32.3.1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)09:27
LaneyI'll add exact_match: true too09:27
* apw giggles, those are so the hardest things to see09:28
LocutusOfBorgmmm I see nvidia test is not ignored on armhf, but why britney started complaining now, with a test that seems to have been failing since the begin on armhf?09:30
LocutusOfBorghttp://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/n/nvidia-graphics-drivers-340/bionic/armhf09:30
cjwatsonLaney: Right, so everything except binary parameters and option values (the latter including ws.op and enumerations like status='Published') should be run through json.dumps09:31
cjwatsonLaney: Switching to launchpadlib would be best if at all possible, but if you really really can't then you'll have to sprinkle json.dumps around09:32
cjwatsonThe way it nearly works but not quite if you don't follow that protocol is certainly unfortunate09:34
apwLocutusOfBorg, that is odd, as the summary does imply it has never passed, and other mentions of that package/version for armhf are always failed09:34
apwLaney, is the package/series/arch page complete, ie are all runs considered by britney on there ?  http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/n/nvidia-graphics-drivers-340/bionic/armhf09:34
Laneyshould be09:35
Laneymaybe there's a problem in britney if anyone fancies looking at that09:35
apwhrm, then it is perplexing that britney is calling that nvidia-g-d-340/armhf a regression, only for patch09:35
Laneythat's where the "is this a regression?" logic lives09:36
apwright it is per-package, but ... that package has never passed either09:37
apwit is per trigger package, but that trigger package, test package combination has never passed either09:37
apw(to be more accurate)09:37
apwwell not if that list is complete09:37
LocutusOfBorgor maybe somebody deleted the hint in the last few days?09:37
LocutusOfBorgbut I don't know how to "git log -p" in bzr09:38
apwbzr log -p ?09:38
apwit never passes in artful either09:38
LocutusOfBorgdamn, it never stops, but it is enough09:38
LocutusOfBorg-force-badtest nvidia-graphics-drivers-340/all/armhf09:38
LocutusOfBorg-# Force nvidia-graphics-drivers-390 in, because new armhf packages being uninstallable is way less important than libglvnd being broken.09:38
LocutusOfBorgpitti09:39
LaneyCertainly looks to me like it should be alwaysfailed, but like I say it needs someone to look into it09:39
Laneyand if nobody wants to, then I guess add the hint back :-)09:39
LocutusOfBorgmaybe slangasek removed too much of that file in this revision? https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-release/britney/hints-ubuntu/revision/297609:40
apwcirtainly it seems reasonable to hint it given it should to all reading be alwaysfail09:41
apwperhaps i should add it but with a reason of "britney needs invesitgaing@09:41
apwLaney, i am wondeirng if s-langasek is using a script wihch checks if the version in the hint matches the archive, and all != version and it gets removed.09:44
apwLaney, or if he is just removing all /all/ hints so that we see if they are needed and readd them09:44
apwoh that one is under "vivid" so i can see how one might ... anyhow ... readding with a current comment09:46
apwOH OH we got some team hints ... yay09:47
apwLocutusOfBorg, hinted again09:48
sil2100Oh, I just now noticed I have my own hint file in britney, huh09:49
* sil2100 always used Steve's09:49
apwsil2100, heh you should indeed, but ... now we have team ones, general hints seem more appropriate there09:49
LocutusOfBorgthanks!09:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted glib2.0 [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.56.1-2ubuntu1]09:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted plasma-framework [source] (bionic-proposed) [5.44.0-0ubuntu3]09:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted vte2.91 [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.52.1-1ubuntu1]09:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-disk-utility [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.1-0ubuntu1]09:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted remmina [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.0-rcgit.29+dfsg-1ubuntu1]09:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (artful-proposed/main) [2.31.2+17.10 => 2.32.3.1+17.10] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)10:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (bionic-proposed/main) [2.32+18.04 => 2.32.3.1+18.04] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)10:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (trusty-proposed/universe) [2.31.2~14.04 => 2.32.3.1~14.04] (no packageset)10:08
* apw will review all those snapd updates ^10:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kmod [sync] (xenial-security) [22-1ubuntu5]10:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: bijiben (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.28.0-1 => 3.28.1-1] (desktop-extra) (sync)10:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shotwell (bionic-proposed/main) [0.28.1-0ubuntu1 => 0.28.2-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) (sync)10:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dtkcore (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.0.7-1 => 2.0.7.1-3] (lubuntu) (sync)10:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-sound-recorder (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.27.90-1 => 3.28.1-1] (no packageset) (sync)10:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-sound-recorder [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.1-1]10:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-shell-extension-taskbar (bionic-proposed/universe) [56.0-1 => 57.0-1] (no packageset) (sync)10:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-shell-extension-taskbar [sync] (bionic-proposed) [57.0-1]10:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: evince (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.0-1 => 3.28.2-1] (ubuntu-desktop) (sync)10:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: evolution-ews (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.28.0-1 => 3.28.1-1] (no packageset) (sync)10:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: evolution (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.28.0-4 => 3.28.1-1] (ubuntukylin) (sync)10:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted evolution-ews [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.1-1]10:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected snapd [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.32]11:00
apw^ snapd superceeded in the queue11:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (xenial-proposed/main) [2.31.2 => 2.32.3.2] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)11:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected neutron [source] (xenial-proposed) [2:8.4.0-0ubuntu7.3]11:02
apw^ neutron superceeded in the queue by the same version with more changes11:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: evolution-data-server (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.0-2ubuntu2 => 3.28.1-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)11:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (artful-proposed/main) [2.31.2+17.10 => 2.32.3.2+17.10] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)11:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (trusty-proposed/universe) [2.31.2~14.04 => 2.32.3.2~14.04] (no packageset)11:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (bionic-proposed/main) [2.32+18.04 => 2.32.3.2+18.04] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)11:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected snapd [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.32.3.1+18.04]11:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected snapd [source] (artful-proposed) [2.32.3.1+17.10]11:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected snapd [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.32.3.1]11:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected snapd [source] (trusty-proposed) [2.32.3.1~14.04]11:11
apw^ snapd* superceeded in the queue, again11:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-chess (bionic-proposed/universe) [1:3.28.0-2 => 1:3.28.1-1] (desktop-extra) (sync)11:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-maps (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.28.0-1 => 3.28.1-1] (desktop-extra, ubuntu-budgie, ubuntugnome) (sync)11:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libdazzle (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.0-1 => 3.28.1-1] (ubuntu-desktop) (sync)11:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libsoup2.4 (bionic-proposed/main) [2.62.0-1 => 2.62.1-1] (core) (sync)11:13
darkxstLaney, https://bileto.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/323011:52
darkxstinclude libzip 1.5.1 release from today11:52
darkxstfor bug 167405711:53
ubot5`bug 1674057 in libzip (Ubuntu) "[FFe] upgrade libzip to version 1.5.0" [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/167405711:53
Laneydarkxst: thx11:54
Laneylooks like you missed the bug reference in libzip11:54
Laneyi'll try to look later on11:54
Laney(anyone else on the team should feel free though)11:54
darkxstLaney, hmm so I did, but can't fix it while its in a ppa12:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ecj (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.12.3-1 => 3.13.2-1] (kubuntu) (sync)12:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python3-defaults (bionic-proposed/main) [3.6.5-2 => 3.6.5-3] (core) (sync)12:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: jericho-html (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.2-1 => 3.2-2] (no packageset) (sync)12:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted jericho-html [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.2-2]12:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted atf-allwinner [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.apritzel.81-1ubuntu1]12:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ecj [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.13.2-1]12:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python3-defaults [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.6.5-3]12:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (bionic-proposed/main) [2.519 => 2.521] (desktop-core)12:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.32.3.2+18.04]12:38
rbasakDeriving from something licensed under Expat and then releasing the result under Apache-2.0 is fine, right?12:42
=== sergiusens_ is now known as sergiusens
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (artful-proposed) [2.32.3.2+17.10]12:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.32.3.2]12:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (trusty-proposed) [2.32.3.2~14.04]12:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kmod (trusty-proposed/main) [15-0ubuntu6 => 15-0ubuntu7] (core)13:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sysprof (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.28.0-1 => 3.28.1-1] (no packageset) (sync)13:46
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: webkit2gtk (bionic-proposed/main) [2.20.0-2ubuntu1 => 2.20.1-1] (desktop-core) (sync)13:46
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kicad (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.0.7+dfsg1-1ubuntu1 => 4.0.7+dfsg1-1ubuntu2] (no packageset)13:46
infinityrbasak: Yes.13:46
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sysprof [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.1-1]13:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zenity (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.0-1 => 3.28.1-1] (ubuntu-desktop) (sync)13:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kicad [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.0.7+dfsg1-1ubuntu2]13:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: golang-github-sanity-io-litter (bionic-proposed/primary) [1.1.0+git20171129.f8fd6a5-1]13:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: golang-github-alecthomas-chroma (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.3.0-1 => 0.4.0+git20180402.51d250f-1] (no packageset) (sync)13:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted golang-github-alecthomas-chroma [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.4.0+git20180402.51d250f-1]13:49
rbasakinfinity: thanks. Apache-2.0 always seemed a bit weird to me so I thought I'd make sure.13:51
infinityrbasak: It's not really about the Apache license, but rather that anything under the MIT/X11/Expat license can have pretty much anything done to it, so long as you retain the copyright.13:55
infinityrbasak: See the Windows TCP stack from 1993 to 2000 or so as an example.13:56
infinity(Well, that was BSD, but same concept)13:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ca-certificates (bionic-proposed/main) [20170717 => 20180409] (core) (sync)14:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ca-certificates [sync] (bionic-proposed) [20180409]14:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted zenity [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.1-1]14:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted webkit2gtk [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.20.1-1]14:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted bijiben [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.1-1]14:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted evince [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.2-1]14:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted evolution [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.1-1]14:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-maps [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.1-1]14:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libsoup2.4 [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.62.1-1]14:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dtkcore [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.0.7.1-3]14:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-chess [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1:3.28.1-1]14:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted shotwell [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.28.2-0ubuntu1]14:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted evolution-data-server [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.1-1ubuntu1]14:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libdazzle [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.1-1]14:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-phyl [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-1] (no packageset)14:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-phyl [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-1] (no packageset)14:31
juliankShould we ignore the ganeti failure for i386 for socat? This thing failed before with the same error messages14:36
juliankit only worked 3 times so far14:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-phyl [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-1] (no packageset)14:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-phyl [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-1] (no packageset)14:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-desktop3 (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.0-0ubuntu1 => 3.28.1-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)14:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-phyl [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-1] (no packageset)14:59
LocutusOfBorgplease accept mongodb, fixing a stupid mistake on my side15:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mongodb (bionic-proposed/universe) [1:3.4.14-3ubuntu1 => 1:3.4.14-3ubuntu2] (mozilla)15:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-phyl [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-1] (no packageset)15:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-sanity-io-litter [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.0+git20171129.f8fd6a5-1]15:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-phyl [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-1]15:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-phyl [i386] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-1]15:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-phyl [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-1]15:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-phyl [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-1]15:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-phyl [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-1]15:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-phyl [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-1]15:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-sanity-io-litter [amd64] (bionic-proposed/none) [1.1.0+git20171129.f8fd6a5-1] (no packageset)15:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sddm (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.17.0-1ubuntu2 => 0.17.0-1ubuntu3] (kubuntu)15:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-sanity-io-litter [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.0+git20171129.f8fd6a5-1]15:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mongodb (bionic-proposed/universe) [1:3.4.14-3ubuntu1 => 1:3.4.14-3ubuntu2] (mozilla)15:29
slangasekacheronuk: the hybrid videa issue is unlikely to be related to the VT configuration.  But I guess you could ask people to retest with an sddm that does start on VT1?15:38
slangasekLocutusOfBorg: ok, node-rollup-plugin-commonjs removed from -proposed15:39
slangasekLocutusOfBorg, apw: I don't currently have good scripting when removing the hints... but http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/n/nvidia-graphics-drivers-340/bionic/armhf shows no passes, so I assumed it was wrong to hint a non-regression15:45
slangasekso, we can add it back, sure15:45
slangasekbut it seems that's cleared up somehow in the meantime?15:46
Laneythere is something interesting with regression / alwaysfailed calculation15:46
Laneypython3-defaults is showing "autopkgtest for glib2.0: amd64: Test in progress (always failed), arm64: Test in progress (always failed), i386: Test in progress (always failed), ppc64el: Test in progress (always failed), s390x: Test in progress (always failed)"15:47
Laneyalways failed is lies15:47
ginggsslangasek: nvidia cleared up because it was hinted15:48
slangasekginggs: ok, but under linux-meta-raspi2, nvidia-graphics-drivers-340/armhf shows as 'always failed', which is not based on hinting15:48
slangasekLaney: doh15:49
apwslangasek, that is under a linux-meta-* so it is not representative of reality15:51
apwslangasek, remember those are specially neutered for history15:52
slangasekapw: ah ok15:52
=== freyes__ is now known as freyes
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: certmonger (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.79.5-3 => 0.79.5-3ubuntu1] (no packageset)15:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted certmonger [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.79.5-3ubuntu1]15:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.8.4+ds-1] (no packageset)15:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.8.4+ds-1] (no packageset)15:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.8.4+ds-1] (no packageset)15:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.8.4+ds-1] (no packageset)16:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.8.4+ds-1] (no packageset)16:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.8.4+ds-1] (no packageset)16:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: linux-meta-oem (bionic-proposed/primary) [4.15.0.1002.3]16:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: linux-oem (bionic-proposed/primary) [4.15.0-1002.3]16:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: linux-signed-oem (bionic-proposed/primary) [4.15.0-1002.3]16:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.8.4+ds-1]16:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.8.4+ds-1]16:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.8.4+ds-1]16:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin [i386] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.8.4+ds-1]16:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.8.4+ds-1]16:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.8.4+ds-1]16:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kmod [source] (trusty-proposed) [15-0ubuntu7]16:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: deepin-picker (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.6.2-1 => 1.6.2-3] (no packageset) (sync)16:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted deepin-picker [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.6.2-3]16:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dtkwidget (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.0.7-1 => 2.0.7.2-2] (lubuntu) (sync)16:11
tsimonq2slangasek: telepathy-qt> I knew I was forgetting something. :/  I'll look tonight.16:35
slangasektsimonq2: k, thanks!16:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-phyl-omics [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-2] (no packageset)16:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-phyl-omics [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-2] (no packageset)16:46
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-phyl-omics [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-2] (no packageset)16:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-phyl-omics [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-2] (no packageset)16:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-phyl-omics [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-2] (no packageset)16:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-phyl-omics [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-2] (no packageset)16:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-taskflow (bionic-proposed/main) [3.1.0-0ubuntu1 => 3.1.0-0ubuntu2] (ubuntu-server)16:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-mate-meta (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.221 => 1.222] (ubuntu-mate)16:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-phyl-omics [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2]17:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-phyl-omics [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2]17:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-phyl-omics [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2]17:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-phyl-omics [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2]17:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-phyl-omics [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2]17:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-phyl-omics [i386] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2]17:01
ErichEickmeyerinfinity, slangasek: I'm Erich from the Ubuntu Studio team. On tsimonq2's advice, I need to give you a heads-up that Ubuntu Studio might not be LTS this release and only go 9-month. We are lacking manpower and are working on a refresh for 18.10 for a number of features, but we simply don't have the manpower for an LTS at this point in time.17:01
tsimonq2o/ ErichEickmeyer17:02
slangasekErichEickmeyer: thanks for the info - from what tsimonq2 had said I thought it was an open question, but if you're definitively not doing an LTS I'm happy to make that adjustment now to the metadata17:02
ErichEickmeyerslangasek: It's an open question still.17:02
ErichEickmeyerI just got the email out to the ML to get a pulse check on the idea.17:03
slangasekErichEickmeyer: you mean you might still change your minds and go LTS?17:03
slangasekah you did say "might not"17:03
slangasekok17:03
ErichEickmeyerYeah, this mostly was a "heads up".17:03
ErichEickmeyerI also want to give sakrecoer the opportunity to advise on this since he's still the lead.17:04
ErichEickmeyerHis time is limited, so I''ve been leading the charge on a number of things.17:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: stress-ng (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.09.23-1 => 0.09.24-1] (no packageset) (sync)17:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted stress-ng [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.09.24-1]17:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-7 (bionic-proposed/main) [7.3.0-15ubuntu2 => 7.3.0-16ubuntu1] (core)17:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-taskflow [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.1.0-0ubuntu2]17:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mongodb [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:3.4.14-3ubuntu2]17:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-7 [source] (bionic-proposed) [7.3.0-16ubuntu1]17:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dtkwidget [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.0.7.2-2]17:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-mate-meta [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.222]17:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: hugo (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.37.1-1 => 0.38-1] (no packageset) (sync)17:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted hugo [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.38-1]17:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: foxtrotgps (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.2.0-1build2 => 1.2.1-1] (no packageset) (sync)18:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted foxtrotgps [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.1-1]18:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-oslo.privsep (bionic-proposed/main) [1.27.0-0ubuntu2 => 1.27.0-0ubuntu3] (ubuntu-server)18:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gtkhash (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.1-1 => 1.1.1-2] (ubuntu-mate) (sync)18:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apcupsd (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.14.14-1 => 3.14.14-2] (no packageset) (sync)18:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apcupsd [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.14.14-2]18:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pandas (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.22.0-2 => 0.22.0-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)18:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pandas [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.22.0-2ubuntu1]18:11
rbasakPlease could some reject mongodb 1:3.4.14-3ubuntu2 from Bionic unapproved? It's been superseded (a 1:3.4.14-3ubuntu2 has already gone in).18:26
slangasekrbasak: done18:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mongodb [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:3.4.14-3ubuntu2]18:36
rbasakThanks!18:38
ginggsslangasek: pandas tests/io/test_pytables.py::TestHDFStore::test_encoding Bus error (core dumped) in case you are inclined18:38
slangasekginggs: on armhf?18:39
ginggsslangasek: yes, I meant to write that.  You seem to be good at fixing alignment issues18:39
slangasekginggs: yeah but pandas was already removed from armhf over these issues and I'm not in a hurry to bring it back18:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected livecd-rootfs [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.520]18:40
slangasekginggs: IIRC I looked at it a while ago and couldn't isolate which library actually contained the bug, in the stack of a half dozen18:40
ginggsslangasek: ok, how about an alignment error in an R package then?  :) r-cran-memoise18:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.521]18:42
slangasekginggs: so basically at this point, it's safe to assume that any armhf sigbuses left in update_excuses are ones that I've looked at and walked away from ;)18:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: golang-github-spf13-afero (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0.2-1 => 1.1.0-1] (no packageset) (sync)18:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted golang-github-spf13-afero [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.0-1]18:48
ginggsslangasek: :)18:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debdelta (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.60 => 0.61] (no packageset) (sync)18:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted debdelta [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.61]18:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libnfs (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.11.0-3 => 2.0.0-1~exp1] (kubuntu) (sync)20:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: strace (bionic-proposed/main) [4.19-1ubuntu2 => 4.21-1ubuntu1] (core)20:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ryu (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15-0ubuntu1 => 4.15-0ubuntu2] (ubuntu-server)20:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-5 (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.5.0-11ubuntu1 => 5.5.0-12ubuntu1] (no packageset)20:22
=== sergiusens_ is now known as sergiusens
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libbpp-qt (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.3.2-1build1 => 2.4.0-1] (no packageset) (sync)20:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-5 [source] (bionic-proposed) [5.5.0-12ubuntu1]20:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libbpp-qt [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-1]20:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: bppsuite (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.3.2-1build1 => 2.4.0-1] (no packageset) (sync)20:23
dokojbicha: did you become a debian-med member? ;p20:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted bppsuite [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-1]20:24
jbichano, just slightly cleaning up after them20:24
jbichadepending on how big of a hurry you're in, you could remove bppphyview and physamp until debian-med cares enough about them to make them buildable again20:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-qt [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-1] (no packageset)20:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-qt [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-1] (no packageset)20:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-qt [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-1] (no packageset)20:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-qt [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-1] (no packageset)20:27
jbichamaybe ignore physamp 1.0.3-1's autopkgtests too20:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-qt [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-1] (no packageset)20:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-qt [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-1] (no packageset)20:28
=== broder_ is now known as broder
=== powersj_ is now known as powersj
=== tumbleweed_ is now known as tumbleweed
=== icey_ is now known as icey
=== wolsen_ is now known as wolsen
slangasekbetter in general to remove a package than to knowingly regress autopkgtests20:28
slangasekdoko: I didn't see an answer to my question about removals of non-buggy packages from -proposed that are blocked by missing deps.  What policy do you think we should be applying here?20:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-7-cross-ports (bionic-proposed/universe) [16ubuntu2 => 16ubuntu3] (no packageset)20:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: slic3r-prusa (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.39.0+dfsg-1 => 1.39.1+dfsg-3] (no packageset) (sync)20:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-7-cross (bionic-proposed/main) [20ubuntu2 => 20ubuntu3] (ubuntu-desktop)20:36
dokohmm, keeping them there makes people look at them again and again. otoh removing will need manual actual by looking into debian20:36
dokostill curious why gcc-7-cross is a desktop package20:36
tsimonq2doko: bug 1683749, perhaps.20:36
ubot5`bug 1683749 in britney "Please list bugs tagged as "update-excuse" on update_excuses" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/168374920:36
dokowell, starts with g* ;p20:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted slic3r-prusa [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.39.1+dfsg-3]20:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-7-cross-ports [source] (bionic-proposed) [16ubuntu3]20:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-qt [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-1]20:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-qt [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-1]20:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-qt [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-1]20:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-qt [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-1]20:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-qt [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-1]20:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-qt [i386] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-1]20:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-meta-oem [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0.1002.3]20:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1002.3]20:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-oem [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1002.3]20:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-7-cross [source] (bionic-proposed) [20ubuntu3]20:38
slangasekdoko: yes, that is the tradeoff.  If we're going to kick them out of -proposed, perhaps we should keep a list somewhere else and revisit (or automatically process) a few times during the cycle?20:40
slangasekdoko: but certainly if we are going to remove packages from -proposed that are not-buggy-but-blocked, nearly everything else > 90 days should also be removed20:41
jbichayes please keep a list20:41
dokothe list sounds fine20:41
slangasekdoko: where would you like to put this list?20:42
jbichathere won't necessarily be a new Debian upload since it's a dependency that's broken in some of these cases not the package itself20:42
slangasekjbicha: precisely20:42
dokoif you remove them, can you revive these packages by some copy magic?20:42
slangasekdoko: yes, absolutely20:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: bind-dyndb-ldap (bionic-proposed/universe) [11.1-1 => 11.1-2] (no packageset) (sync)20:43
dokoslangasek: keep it in a place where I can write =)20:43
slangasekdoko: the wiki?  the sync-blacklist branch?20:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted bind-dyndb-ldap [sync] (bionic-proposed) [11.1-2]20:44
dokosync-blocklist would make sense20:44
slangasekdoko: also I don't know a good way to query the list of packages that you have recently removed; I know grafana-zabbix only because it was such an outlier, but I think it probably wasn't the only one20:44
dokoI'll look in my shell history. will prepare a list tomrrow and send it to you20:46
slangasekdoko: thanks20:46
slangasekdoko: https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-archive/+junk/sync-blacklist/view/head:/extra-removals.txt20:48
tsimonq2I really wish we could see who accepts/rejects a package and why, while we're at it. Would LP be the right thing to file against, or does a separate piece of tooling handle queue management?20:49
LocutusOfBorgg'night folks!20:49
* tsimonq2 waves to LocutusOfBorg 20:49
slangasektsimonq2: yes, LP20:49
slangasektsimonq2: removals are documented in the history however20:50
tsimonq2slangasek: Correct, in the publishing history.20:50
slangasekah yes you said accepts/rejects not accepts/removals, ignore me20:51
tsimonq2slangasek: So I can be specific in the bug report, Soyuz?20:51
slangasektsimonq2: yes20:51
tsimonq2slangasek: okl20:51
slangasek(not sure if that matters)20:51
tsimonq2*ok20:51
tsimonq2¯\_(ツ)_/¯20:51
dokoginggs: now nodejs migrated, and I see js tests failing ... https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-bionic/bionic/armhf/s/sphinx/20180411_204814_f63f9@/log.gz20:53
tsimonq2slangasek: bug 1763174, how's it look?20:53
ubot5`bug 1763174 in Launchpad itself "Soyuz should document acceptions/rejections from the queue" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/176317420:53
doko;p20:53
slangasektsimonq2: no opinion ;)20:54
tsimonq2slangasek: No opinion on the clarity of the bug report and how accurately it describes the current situation at hand, as well as what's desired? ;)20:55
slangasekyep!20:55
tsimonq2Alright. :)20:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gtkhash [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.1-2]20:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libnfs [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.0.0-1~exp1]20:55
tsimonq2slangasek: Assigned it to myself; it'll probably be handled post-18.04 but ideally before the floodgates open, much like bug 1654761.20:56
ubot5`bug 1654761 in Auto Package Testing "Make sure duplicate tests cannot be queued" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/165476120:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libnfs [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.0.0-1~exp1] (kubuntu)20:58
* tsimonq2 wonders how quick the Calculating Camel will be announced...20:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libnfs [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.0.0-1~exp1] (kubuntu)20:59
tsimonq2slangasek: Would you happen to know where I can find the autoaccepter script?20:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libnfs [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.0.0-1~exp1] (kubuntu)21:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libnfs [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.0.0-1~exp1] (kubuntu)21:00
tsimonq2lp:ubuntu-archive-publishing?21:00
ginggstsimonq2: see sphinx autopkgtest failures http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/sphinx/bionic/armhf - related to your nodejs?21:01
slangasektsimonq2: I don't know; afaik stgraber operates it21:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libnfs [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.0.0-1~exp1] (kubuntu)21:01
tsimonq2ginggs: I'm not sure; are we talking about the nodejs you synced in my name? ;P21:02
tsimonq2slangasek: ack, he's on vac?21:03
cyphermoxyes21:03
tsimonq2Ok, I'll ping next week.21:03
slangasektsimonq2: so he said21:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libnfs [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [2.0.0-1~exp1]21:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libnfs [i386] (bionic-proposed) [2.0.0-1~exp1]21:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libnfs [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [2.0.0-1~exp1]21:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libnfs [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [2.0.0-1~exp1]21:04
tsimonq2nodejs> To be serious here, I'm not entirely sure what the problem is with those tests.21:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libnfs [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [2.0.0-1~exp1]21:04
ginggsdoko: FAILURES / test_build_sphinx / ModuleNotFoundError: No module named \'distutils.core\'21:04
tsimonq2Right, why would that be nodejs?21:05
dokooops21:07
dokobut just armhf?21:07
ginggsdoko: the others haven't run yet - (well ppc64el and s390x did, but they always fail)21:09
=== sergiusens_ is now known as sergiusens
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sphinx (bionic-proposed/main) [1.6.7-1 => 1.6.7-1ubuntu1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-server)21:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sphinx [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.6.7-1ubuntu1]21:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted strace [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.21-1ubuntu1]21:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-oslo.privsep [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.27.0-0ubuntu3]21:16
=== sergiusens_ is now known as sergiusens
=== sergiusens_ is now known as sergiusens
Bashing-omTJ-: Watching in #ubuntu-release. heavy discussion on the release testing schedules .21:34
tsimonq2Bashing-om: "heavy discussion"? :)21:35
Bashing-omopps wrong window ^ // Yeah .. been a bit following what yall are discussing .21:36
tsimonq2Maybe on the mailing list, but unless I missed something, not here?21:36
Bashing-omtsimonq2: mailing list for the most part . some reference here .. else I would not have much of a clue :)21:37
tsimonq2Bashing-om: I assume I can continue this conversation with you in #ubuntu-discuss? ;)21:38
Bashing-omtsimonq2: Yes my mentor . I await .21:38
=== sergiusens_ is now known as sergiusens
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnocchi (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.2.0-0ubuntu2 => 4.2.0-0ubuntu3] (no packageset)21:49
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnocchi [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.2.0-0ubuntu3]21:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gpaw (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.3.0-2 => 1.3.0-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)21:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gpaw [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.3.0-2ubuntu1]21:58
ginggsdoko: will you send that gpaw fix to debian please?22:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-testtools (bionic-proposed/main) [2.3.0-3ubuntu1 => 2.3.0-3ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)22:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-future (bionic-proposed/main) [0.15.2-4ubuntu1 => 0.15.2-4ubuntu2] (ubuntu-server)22:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-future [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.15.2-4ubuntu2]22:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-testtools [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.3.0-3ubuntu2]22:11
dokoginggs: yes22:11
ginggsdoko: :) I was waiting for the problem to appear in ubuntu22:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libunity (bionic-proposed/main) [7.1.4+18.04.20180209.1-0ubuntu1 => 7.1.4+18.04.20180209.1-0ubuntu2] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)22:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libunity [source] (bionic-proposed) [7.1.4+18.04.20180209.1-0ubuntu2]22:24
ginggsdoko: you get a panda! arm64 you get a panda! s390x you get a panda!  \o/ everyone gets pandas! except you, armhf, you and your silly bus error22:34
slangasekarmhf, TI already gave you pandas22:34
valorie aren't we handing out beavers this round?22:36
tsimonq2I want camels :P22:36
valorielol22:36
xnoxshit, cancel order of 100s of pandas22:36
tsimonq2hahahahahahaa22:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-7 (bionic-proposed/main) [7.3.0-16ubuntu1 => 7.3.0-16ubuntu2] (core)22:47
mwhudsoni have a broken pandaboard if anyone is feeling left out22:48
mwhudsoni think technically it belongs to linaro22:48
xnoxI went to zoo in Hong Kong and saw a very sad panda22:49
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-7 [source] (bionic-proposed) [7.3.0-16ubuntu2]22:49
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oem [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.15.0-1002.3] (kernel)22:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1002.3]23:08
ginggsI went to a zoo that only had a dog23:08
tsimonq2hahahaha23:09
ginggsit was a shih tzu23:09
tsimonq2xnox: Sad pandas are bad. You cheered it up, I hope?23:09
dokothey have limits on noise levels over there23:13
tsimonq2Ah.23:15

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!