slangasek | acheronuk, tsimonq2: ok, I think the regular dm and ubiquity having different opinions about which tty to run on may at least be contributing to the issue - in particular, I see that if display-manager doesn't Conflicts=getty@tty1.service, getty@tty1.service tries to start in parallel with ubiquity.service, which is going to be bad | 00:03 |
---|---|---|
slangasek | acheronuk, tsimonq2: so I think from the ubiquity side, we solve this by adding that Conflicts to ubiquity.service; but that sddm also changing would be sensible; I'll test the first part here | 00:03 |
tsimonq2 | slangasek: ack | 00:08 |
slangasek | tsimonq2: that worked on the first go | 00:10 |
slangasek | so I'll push that change | 00:10 |
slangasek | (for review, at least) | 00:10 |
tsimonq2 | ok | 00:11 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mate-settings-daemon (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.20.1-0ubuntu1 => 1.20.1-2ubuntu1] (ubuntu-mate) | 00:11 | |
acheronuk | slangasek: thank you. | 00:13 |
acheronuk | good night | 00:13 |
slangasek | infinity, cyphermox: one of you care to review https://code.launchpad.net/~vorlon/ubiquity/conflict-with-getty1/+merge/342977 ? | 00:18 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: buildbot (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.1-3ubuntu3 => 1.1.1-3ubuntu4] (no packageset) | 00:18 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted buildbot [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.1-3ubuntu4] | 00:19 | |
doko | what's wrong wih systemd on arm64? | 00:23 |
cyphermox | slangasek: yay | 00:28 |
cyphermox | slangasek: is your other MP, for regain_privileges(), ready too? | 00:29 |
cyphermox | infinity wanted to have a look and better understand it | 00:29 |
slangasek | cyphermox: I haven't gotten feedback yet on that one, I suggest leaving it | 00:33 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xubuntu-community-artwork (bionic-proposed/universe) [16.04.0 => 18.04.0] (ubuntustudio, xubuntu) | 00:53 | |
slangasek | doko: why did primer3 need a no-change rebuild? | 01:13 |
doko | slangasek: I had the impression that this was needed to drop the s390x test rebuilds | 01:15 |
slangasek | ok | 01:15 |
slangasek | it didn't drop them | 01:15 |
slangasek | :) | 01:15 |
slangasek | oh, test rebuilds | 01:15 |
slangasek | so unrelated to the autopkgtests? | 01:16 |
doko | no, I really mean autopkgtests | 01:18 |
slangasek | ok | 01:18 |
slangasek | doko: incidentally, Debian bug #850065 looks relevant on openfoam, apparently this package doesn't obey the build env's guidance around parallelization | 01:19 |
ubot5` | Debian bug 850065 in src:openfoam "openfoam: Build runs way more parallel processes than specified by DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS" [Important,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/850065 | 01:19 |
doko | slangasek: this is unrelated, caused by make 4.2. I removed that for Ubuntu proposed | 01:23 |
slangasek | doko: I don't think so? That bug report is a year old | 01:24 |
doko | hmm | 01:25 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (bionic-proposed/main) [18.2-4-g05926e48-0ubuntu1 => 18.2-4-g05926e48-0ubuntu2] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server) | 01:31 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: peony (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.0-0ubuntu1 => 1.1.1-0ubuntu1] (ubuntukylin) | 02:12 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (bionic-proposed) [18.2-4-g05926e48-0ubuntu2] | 02:23 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted peony [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.1-0ubuntu1] | 02:23 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mate-settings-daemon [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.20.1-2ubuntu1] | 02:23 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xubuntu-community-artwork [source] (bionic-proposed) [18.04.0] | 02:23 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xubuntu-community-artwork [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [18.04.0] (ubuntustudio, xubuntu) | 02:35 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xubuntu-community-artwork [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [18.04.0] | 02:37 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd-glib (bionic-proposed/main) [1.38-1 => 1.39-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) | 03:28 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: atf-allwinner (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0.apritzel.81-1 => 1.0.apritzel.81-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 04:11 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted atf-allwinner [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.apritzel.81-1ubuntu1] | 04:12 | |
slangasek | LocutusOfBorg: is rollup bootstrap still on your radar? by grepping logs I found you asked for node-rollup-plugin-commonjs 9.0 to be kicked out of -proposed; is that still the right thing to do? | 04:12 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: atf-allwinner [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0.apritzel.81-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 04:15 | |
slangasek | tsimonq2: any plans for telepathy-qt? | 04:21 |
=== maclin1 is now known as maclin | ||
slangasek | uint64_t k1 = gu_le64(blocks[i]); | 04:41 |
slangasek | // Block read - if your platform needs to do endian-swapping or can only | 04:41 |
slangasek | // handle aligned reads, do the conversion here | 04:41 |
slangasek | aligned reads, you do not understand them | 04:41 |
acheronuk | slangasek: is this possibly linked to the general (not ubiquity) switch to VT1? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1762885 | 06:22 |
ubot5` | Ubuntu bug 1762885 in sddm (Ubuntu) "SDDM fails to start on laptops modern NVidia cards" [Undecided,New] | 06:22 |
acheronuk | or just maybe general nvidia ****iness | 06:23 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (bionic-proposed/main) [2.519 => 2.520] (desktop-core) | 07:21 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: krita (bionic-proposed/universe) [1:4.0.0+dfsg-0ubuntu1 => 1:4.0.1+dfsg-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu) | 07:25 | |
Laney | doko: rfc thing> I know, I filed a bug and pinged Till about it, new ghostscript broke it | 08:03 |
LocutusOfBorg | yes slangasek it is still the right thing, unfortunately | 08:08 |
LocutusOfBorg | I could finish the bootstrap, but no change rebuilding the package ends to different/unworking content | 08:08 |
LocutusOfBorg | so I don't want to do an archive publishing with something that starts from a "npm install" on my pc | 08:08 |
LocutusOfBorg | so, kicking up commonjs will prevent this bug https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=892742 | 08:09 |
ubot5` | Debian bug 892742 in src:node-rollup "rollup FTBFS with node-rollup-plugin-commonjs 9.0" [Serious,Open] | 08:09 |
LocutusOfBorg | but we will stuck with: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=892133 | 08:09 |
ubot5` | Debian bug 892133 in node-rollup "node-rollup: does not work after a no-change rebuild (the one in the archive is not suitable for main?)" [Serious,Open] | 08:09 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: command-not-found (bionic-proposed/main) [18.04.0 => 18.04.1] (core) | 08:10 | |
LocutusOfBorg | hello, wrt remmina in queue, upstream asked me to do the merge, they feel confident about the release, and they would appreciate it being part of bionic | 08:35 |
LocutusOfBorg | while this is not a bug-fix only release, it is true that new features are related to "new plugins", without changing the actual code | 08:36 |
LocutusOfBorg | and there is a serious ssh bug fixed in this release | 08:37 |
LocutusOfBorg | with lots of RDP crashes fixes, and some ubuntu patch merged upstream | 08:37 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected command-not-found [source] (bionic-proposed) [18.04.1] | 08:50 | |
apw | ^ rejecting as there is some expected change which needs investigation | 08:50 |
LocutusOfBorg | Laney, did you find the "hey can't retry failed update-notifier on armhf tests" written above? :) | 08:50 |
LocutusOfBorg | my mind is blowing because of that :D | 08:51 |
Laney | no | 08:51 |
Laney | weird though, that call is doing archive.getPublishedSources | 08:55 |
LocutusOfBorg | rmadison shows it as published | 08:56 |
LocutusOfBorg | also, britney | 08:56 |
LocutusOfBorg | are we somewhat confusing update-manager and update-notifier? | 08:58 |
LocutusOfBorg | or... epoch issue? | 08:58 |
LocutusOfBorg | oh I can schedule a test against 0.189 and not 0.190 | 09:00 |
Laney | https://api.launchpad.net/1.0/ubuntu/+archive/primary?distro_series=https%3A%2F%2Fapi.launchpad.net%2F1.0%2Fubuntu%2Fbionic&version=3.190&status=Published&source_name=update-notifier&ws.op=getPublishedSources | 09:12 |
Laney | this is what we're hitting | 09:12 |
Laney | what's wrong with that then? | 09:13 |
LocutusOfBorg | You submitted an invalid request: update-notifier/3.190 is not published in bionic | 09:14 |
LocutusOfBorg | maybe bionic-proposed? | 09:15 |
LocutusOfBorg | oh, this works indeed https://api.launchpad.net/1.0/ubuntu/+archive/primary?distro_series=https%3A%2F%2Fapi.launchpad.net%2F1.0%2Fubuntu%2Fbionic&version=3.189&status=Published&source_name=update-notifier&ws.op=getPublishedSources | 09:15 |
Laney | yes, and if you remove the version it shows 3.190 | 09:16 |
LocutusOfBorg | maybe publisher was killed while publishing and didn't retry to do something? | 09:16 |
Laney | so I need to understand what the problem is there | 09:16 |
cjwatson | bad serialisation | 09:18 |
cjwatson | you're sending version as a float | 09:18 |
cjwatson | should be version=%223.190%22 | 09:18 |
cjwatson | otherwise it turns into 3.19 ... | 09:19 |
LocutusOfBorg | LOOOOOOOOOOOOL | 09:19 |
LocutusOfBorg | good catch! :) | 09:19 |
cjwatson | I guess you're constructing the query manually rather than using launchpadlib here? | 09:20 |
cjwatson | also, you should really add &exact_match=true | 09:21 |
Laney | it's doing if version is not None: | 09:21 |
Laney | req['version'] = version | 09:21 |
cjwatson | can you point me to the code? | 09:21 |
Laney | https://git.launchpad.net/autopkgtest-cloud/tree/webcontrol/request/submit.py#n256 | 09:21 |
cjwatson | right, so you're constructing the request yourself and not doing the marshalling properly | 09:22 |
cjwatson | let me see where the canonical code for this is | 09:24 |
Laney | cheers, didn't occur to me that this wasn't being treated as a string | 09:27 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (xenial-proposed/main) [2.31.2 => 2.32.3.1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) | 09:27 | |
Laney | I'll add exact_match: true too | 09:27 |
* apw giggles, those are so the hardest things to see | 09:28 | |
LocutusOfBorg | mmm I see nvidia test is not ignored on armhf, but why britney started complaining now, with a test that seems to have been failing since the begin on armhf? | 09:30 |
LocutusOfBorg | http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/n/nvidia-graphics-drivers-340/bionic/armhf | 09:30 |
cjwatson | Laney: Right, so everything except binary parameters and option values (the latter including ws.op and enumerations like status='Published') should be run through json.dumps | 09:31 |
cjwatson | Laney: Switching to launchpadlib would be best if at all possible, but if you really really can't then you'll have to sprinkle json.dumps around | 09:32 |
cjwatson | The way it nearly works but not quite if you don't follow that protocol is certainly unfortunate | 09:34 |
apw | LocutusOfBorg, that is odd, as the summary does imply it has never passed, and other mentions of that package/version for armhf are always failed | 09:34 |
apw | Laney, is the package/series/arch page complete, ie are all runs considered by britney on there ? http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/n/nvidia-graphics-drivers-340/bionic/armhf | 09:34 |
Laney | should be | 09:35 |
Laney | maybe there's a problem in britney if anyone fancies looking at that | 09:35 |
apw | hrm, then it is perplexing that britney is calling that nvidia-g-d-340/armhf a regression, only for patch | 09:35 |
Laney | that's where the "is this a regression?" logic lives | 09:36 |
apw | right it is per-package, but ... that package has never passed either | 09:37 |
apw | it is per trigger package, but that trigger package, test package combination has never passed either | 09:37 |
apw | (to be more accurate) | 09:37 |
apw | well not if that list is complete | 09:37 |
LocutusOfBorg | or maybe somebody deleted the hint in the last few days? | 09:37 |
LocutusOfBorg | but I don't know how to "git log -p" in bzr | 09:38 |
apw | bzr log -p ? | 09:38 |
apw | it never passes in artful either | 09:38 |
LocutusOfBorg | damn, it never stops, but it is enough | 09:38 |
LocutusOfBorg | -force-badtest nvidia-graphics-drivers-340/all/armhf | 09:38 |
LocutusOfBorg | -# Force nvidia-graphics-drivers-390 in, because new armhf packages being uninstallable is way less important than libglvnd being broken. | 09:38 |
LocutusOfBorg | pitti | 09:39 |
Laney | Certainly looks to me like it should be alwaysfailed, but like I say it needs someone to look into it | 09:39 |
Laney | and if nobody wants to, then I guess add the hint back :-) | 09:39 |
LocutusOfBorg | maybe slangasek removed too much of that file in this revision? https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-release/britney/hints-ubuntu/revision/2976 | 09:40 |
apw | cirtainly it seems reasonable to hint it given it should to all reading be alwaysfail | 09:41 |
apw | perhaps i should add it but with a reason of "britney needs invesitgaing@ | 09:41 |
apw | Laney, i am wondeirng if s-langasek is using a script wihch checks if the version in the hint matches the archive, and all != version and it gets removed. | 09:44 |
apw | Laney, or if he is just removing all /all/ hints so that we see if they are needed and readd them | 09:44 |
apw | oh that one is under "vivid" so i can see how one might ... anyhow ... readding with a current comment | 09:46 |
apw | OH OH we got some team hints ... yay | 09:47 |
apw | LocutusOfBorg, hinted again | 09:48 |
sil2100 | Oh, I just now noticed I have my own hint file in britney, huh | 09:49 |
* sil2100 always used Steve's | 09:49 | |
apw | sil2100, heh you should indeed, but ... now we have team ones, general hints seem more appropriate there | 09:49 |
LocutusOfBorg | thanks! | 09:50 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted glib2.0 [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.56.1-2ubuntu1] | 09:50 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted plasma-framework [source] (bionic-proposed) [5.44.0-0ubuntu3] | 09:50 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted vte2.91 [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.52.1-1ubuntu1] | 09:50 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-disk-utility [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.1-0ubuntu1] | 09:50 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted remmina [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.0-rcgit.29+dfsg-1ubuntu1] | 09:50 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (artful-proposed/main) [2.31.2+17.10 => 2.32.3.1+17.10] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) | 10:00 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (bionic-proposed/main) [2.32+18.04 => 2.32.3.1+18.04] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) | 10:00 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (trusty-proposed/universe) [2.31.2~14.04 => 2.32.3.1~14.04] (no packageset) | 10:08 | |
* apw will review all those snapd updates ^ | 10:08 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kmod [sync] (xenial-security) [22-1ubuntu5] | 10:13 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: bijiben (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.28.0-1 => 3.28.1-1] (desktop-extra) (sync) | 10:50 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shotwell (bionic-proposed/main) [0.28.1-0ubuntu1 => 0.28.2-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) (sync) | 10:50 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dtkcore (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.0.7-1 => 2.0.7.1-3] (lubuntu) (sync) | 10:51 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-sound-recorder (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.27.90-1 => 3.28.1-1] (no packageset) (sync) | 10:52 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-sound-recorder [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.1-1] | 10:52 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-shell-extension-taskbar (bionic-proposed/universe) [56.0-1 => 57.0-1] (no packageset) (sync) | 10:52 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-shell-extension-taskbar [sync] (bionic-proposed) [57.0-1] | 10:54 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: evince (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.0-1 => 3.28.2-1] (ubuntu-desktop) (sync) | 10:57 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: evolution-ews (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.28.0-1 => 3.28.1-1] (no packageset) (sync) | 10:58 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: evolution (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.28.0-4 => 3.28.1-1] (ubuntukylin) (sync) | 10:58 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted evolution-ews [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.1-1] | 10:58 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected snapd [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.32] | 11:00 | |
apw | ^ snapd superceeded in the queue | 11:00 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (xenial-proposed/main) [2.31.2 => 2.32.3.2] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) | 11:01 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected neutron [source] (xenial-proposed) [2:8.4.0-0ubuntu7.3] | 11:02 | |
apw | ^ neutron superceeded in the queue by the same version with more changes | 11:02 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: evolution-data-server (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.0-2ubuntu2 => 3.28.1-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) | 11:03 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (artful-proposed/main) [2.31.2+17.10 => 2.32.3.2+17.10] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) | 11:07 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (trusty-proposed/universe) [2.31.2~14.04 => 2.32.3.2~14.04] (no packageset) | 11:08 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (bionic-proposed/main) [2.32+18.04 => 2.32.3.2+18.04] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) | 11:08 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected snapd [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.32.3.1+18.04] | 11:10 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected snapd [source] (artful-proposed) [2.32.3.1+17.10] | 11:11 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected snapd [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.32.3.1] | 11:11 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected snapd [source] (trusty-proposed) [2.32.3.1~14.04] | 11:11 | |
apw | ^ snapd* superceeded in the queue, again | 11:11 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-chess (bionic-proposed/universe) [1:3.28.0-2 => 1:3.28.1-1] (desktop-extra) (sync) | 11:12 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-maps (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.28.0-1 => 3.28.1-1] (desktop-extra, ubuntu-budgie, ubuntugnome) (sync) | 11:13 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libdazzle (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.0-1 => 3.28.1-1] (ubuntu-desktop) (sync) | 11:13 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libsoup2.4 (bionic-proposed/main) [2.62.0-1 => 2.62.1-1] (core) (sync) | 11:13 | |
darkxst | Laney, https://bileto.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/3230 | 11:52 |
darkxst | include libzip 1.5.1 release from today | 11:52 |
darkxst | for bug 1674057 | 11:53 |
ubot5` | bug 1674057 in libzip (Ubuntu) "[FFe] upgrade libzip to version 1.5.0" [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1674057 | 11:53 |
Laney | darkxst: thx | 11:54 |
Laney | looks like you missed the bug reference in libzip | 11:54 |
Laney | i'll try to look later on | 11:54 |
Laney | (anyone else on the team should feel free though) | 11:54 |
darkxst | Laney, hmm so I did, but can't fix it while its in a ppa | 12:01 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ecj (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.12.3-1 => 3.13.2-1] (kubuntu) (sync) | 12:09 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python3-defaults (bionic-proposed/main) [3.6.5-2 => 3.6.5-3] (core) (sync) | 12:09 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: jericho-html (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.2-1 => 3.2-2] (no packageset) (sync) | 12:09 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted jericho-html [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.2-2] | 12:09 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted atf-allwinner [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.apritzel.81-1ubuntu1] | 12:17 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ecj [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.13.2-1] | 12:17 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python3-defaults [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.6.5-3] | 12:17 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (bionic-proposed/main) [2.519 => 2.521] (desktop-core) | 12:22 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.32.3.2+18.04] | 12:38 | |
rbasak | Deriving from something licensed under Expat and then releasing the result under Apache-2.0 is fine, right? | 12:42 |
=== sergiusens_ is now known as sergiusens | ||
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (artful-proposed) [2.32.3.2+17.10] | 12:45 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.32.3.2] | 12:50 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (trusty-proposed) [2.32.3.2~14.04] | 12:51 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kmod (trusty-proposed/main) [15-0ubuntu6 => 15-0ubuntu7] (core) | 13:07 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sysprof (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.28.0-1 => 3.28.1-1] (no packageset) (sync) | 13:46 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: webkit2gtk (bionic-proposed/main) [2.20.0-2ubuntu1 => 2.20.1-1] (desktop-core) (sync) | 13:46 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kicad (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.0.7+dfsg1-1ubuntu1 => 4.0.7+dfsg1-1ubuntu2] (no packageset) | 13:46 | |
infinity | rbasak: Yes. | 13:46 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sysprof [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.1-1] | 13:47 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zenity (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.0-1 => 3.28.1-1] (ubuntu-desktop) (sync) | 13:47 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kicad [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.0.7+dfsg1-1ubuntu2] | 13:48 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: golang-github-sanity-io-litter (bionic-proposed/primary) [1.1.0+git20171129.f8fd6a5-1] | 13:48 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: golang-github-alecthomas-chroma (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.3.0-1 => 0.4.0+git20180402.51d250f-1] (no packageset) (sync) | 13:48 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted golang-github-alecthomas-chroma [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.4.0+git20180402.51d250f-1] | 13:49 | |
rbasak | infinity: thanks. Apache-2.0 always seemed a bit weird to me so I thought I'd make sure. | 13:51 |
infinity | rbasak: It's not really about the Apache license, but rather that anything under the MIT/X11/Expat license can have pretty much anything done to it, so long as you retain the copyright. | 13:55 |
infinity | rbasak: See the Windows TCP stack from 1993 to 2000 or so as an example. | 13:56 |
infinity | (Well, that was BSD, but same concept) | 13:56 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ca-certificates (bionic-proposed/main) [20170717 => 20180409] (core) (sync) | 14:21 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ca-certificates [sync] (bionic-proposed) [20180409] | 14:22 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted zenity [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.1-1] | 14:22 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted webkit2gtk [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.20.1-1] | 14:22 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted bijiben [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.1-1] | 14:25 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted evince [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.2-1] | 14:25 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted evolution [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.1-1] | 14:25 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-maps [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.1-1] | 14:25 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libsoup2.4 [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.62.1-1] | 14:25 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dtkcore [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.0.7.1-3] | 14:25 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-chess [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1:3.28.1-1] | 14:25 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted shotwell [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.28.2-0ubuntu1] | 14:25 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted evolution-data-server [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.1-1ubuntu1] | 14:25 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libdazzle [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.1-1] | 14:25 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-phyl [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-1] (no packageset) | 14:30 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-phyl [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-1] (no packageset) | 14:31 | |
juliank | Should we ignore the ganeti failure for i386 for socat? This thing failed before with the same error messages | 14:36 |
juliank | it only worked 3 times so far | 14:36 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-phyl [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-1] (no packageset) | 14:38 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-phyl [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-1] (no packageset) | 14:40 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-desktop3 (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.0-0ubuntu1 => 3.28.1-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) | 14:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-phyl [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-1] (no packageset) | 14:59 | |
LocutusOfBorg | please accept mongodb, fixing a stupid mistake on my side | 15:01 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mongodb (bionic-proposed/universe) [1:3.4.14-3ubuntu1 => 1:3.4.14-3ubuntu2] (mozilla) | 15:01 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-phyl [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-1] (no packageset) | 15:02 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-sanity-io-litter [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.0+git20171129.f8fd6a5-1] | 15:05 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-phyl [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-1] | 15:05 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-phyl [i386] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-1] | 15:05 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-phyl [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-1] | 15:05 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-phyl [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-1] | 15:06 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-phyl [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-1] | 15:06 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-phyl [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-1] | 15:06 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-sanity-io-litter [amd64] (bionic-proposed/none) [1.1.0+git20171129.f8fd6a5-1] (no packageset) | 15:07 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sddm (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.17.0-1ubuntu2 => 0.17.0-1ubuntu3] (kubuntu) | 15:08 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-sanity-io-litter [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.0+git20171129.f8fd6a5-1] | 15:09 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mongodb (bionic-proposed/universe) [1:3.4.14-3ubuntu1 => 1:3.4.14-3ubuntu2] (mozilla) | 15:29 | |
slangasek | acheronuk: the hybrid videa issue is unlikely to be related to the VT configuration. But I guess you could ask people to retest with an sddm that does start on VT1? | 15:38 |
slangasek | LocutusOfBorg: ok, node-rollup-plugin-commonjs removed from -proposed | 15:39 |
slangasek | LocutusOfBorg, apw: I don't currently have good scripting when removing the hints... but http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/n/nvidia-graphics-drivers-340/bionic/armhf shows no passes, so I assumed it was wrong to hint a non-regression | 15:45 |
slangasek | so, we can add it back, sure | 15:45 |
slangasek | but it seems that's cleared up somehow in the meantime? | 15:46 |
Laney | there is something interesting with regression / alwaysfailed calculation | 15:46 |
Laney | python3-defaults is showing "autopkgtest for glib2.0: amd64: Test in progress (always failed), arm64: Test in progress (always failed), i386: Test in progress (always failed), ppc64el: Test in progress (always failed), s390x: Test in progress (always failed)" | 15:47 |
Laney | always failed is lies | 15:47 |
ginggs | slangasek: nvidia cleared up because it was hinted | 15:48 |
slangasek | ginggs: ok, but under linux-meta-raspi2, nvidia-graphics-drivers-340/armhf shows as 'always failed', which is not based on hinting | 15:48 |
slangasek | Laney: doh | 15:49 |
apw | slangasek, that is under a linux-meta-* so it is not representative of reality | 15:51 |
apw | slangasek, remember those are specially neutered for history | 15:52 |
slangasek | apw: ah ok | 15:52 |
=== freyes__ is now known as freyes | ||
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: certmonger (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.79.5-3 => 0.79.5-3ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 15:56 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted certmonger [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.79.5-3ubuntu1] | 15:57 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.8.4+ds-1] (no packageset) | 15:58 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.8.4+ds-1] (no packageset) | 15:58 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.8.4+ds-1] (no packageset) | 15:58 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.8.4+ds-1] (no packageset) | 16:00 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.8.4+ds-1] (no packageset) | 16:00 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.8.4+ds-1] (no packageset) | 16:01 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: linux-meta-oem (bionic-proposed/primary) [4.15.0.1002.3] | 16:03 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: linux-oem (bionic-proposed/primary) [4.15.0-1002.3] | 16:03 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: linux-signed-oem (bionic-proposed/primary) [4.15.0-1002.3] | 16:04 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.8.4+ds-1] | 16:06 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.8.4+ds-1] | 16:06 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.8.4+ds-1] | 16:06 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin [i386] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.8.4+ds-1] | 16:06 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.8.4+ds-1] | 16:06 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.8.4+ds-1] | 16:06 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kmod [source] (trusty-proposed) [15-0ubuntu7] | 16:11 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: deepin-picker (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.6.2-1 => 1.6.2-3] (no packageset) (sync) | 16:11 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted deepin-picker [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.6.2-3] | 16:11 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dtkwidget (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.0.7-1 => 2.0.7.2-2] (lubuntu) (sync) | 16:11 | |
tsimonq2 | slangasek: telepathy-qt> I knew I was forgetting something. :/ I'll look tonight. | 16:35 |
slangasek | tsimonq2: k, thanks! | 16:37 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-phyl-omics [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-2] (no packageset) | 16:45 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-phyl-omics [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-2] (no packageset) | 16:46 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-phyl-omics [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-2] (no packageset) | 16:47 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-phyl-omics [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-2] (no packageset) | 16:47 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-phyl-omics [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-2] (no packageset) | 16:48 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-phyl-omics [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-2] (no packageset) | 16:52 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-taskflow (bionic-proposed/main) [3.1.0-0ubuntu1 => 3.1.0-0ubuntu2] (ubuntu-server) | 16:53 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-mate-meta (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.221 => 1.222] (ubuntu-mate) | 16:59 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-phyl-omics [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2] | 17:01 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-phyl-omics [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2] | 17:01 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-phyl-omics [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2] | 17:01 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-phyl-omics [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2] | 17:01 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-phyl-omics [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2] | 17:01 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-phyl-omics [i386] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2] | 17:01 | |
ErichEickmeyer | infinity, slangasek: I'm Erich from the Ubuntu Studio team. On tsimonq2's advice, I need to give you a heads-up that Ubuntu Studio might not be LTS this release and only go 9-month. We are lacking manpower and are working on a refresh for 18.10 for a number of features, but we simply don't have the manpower for an LTS at this point in time. | 17:01 |
tsimonq2 | o/ ErichEickmeyer | 17:02 |
slangasek | ErichEickmeyer: thanks for the info - from what tsimonq2 had said I thought it was an open question, but if you're definitively not doing an LTS I'm happy to make that adjustment now to the metadata | 17:02 |
ErichEickmeyer | slangasek: It's an open question still. | 17:02 |
ErichEickmeyer | I just got the email out to the ML to get a pulse check on the idea. | 17:03 |
slangasek | ErichEickmeyer: you mean you might still change your minds and go LTS? | 17:03 |
slangasek | ah you did say "might not" | 17:03 |
slangasek | ok | 17:03 |
ErichEickmeyer | Yeah, this mostly was a "heads up". | 17:03 |
ErichEickmeyer | I also want to give sakrecoer the opportunity to advise on this since he's still the lead. | 17:04 |
ErichEickmeyer | His time is limited, so I''ve been leading the charge on a number of things. | 17:06 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: stress-ng (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.09.23-1 => 0.09.24-1] (no packageset) (sync) | 17:12 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted stress-ng [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.09.24-1] | 17:13 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-7 (bionic-proposed/main) [7.3.0-15ubuntu2 => 7.3.0-16ubuntu1] (core) | 17:18 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-taskflow [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.1.0-0ubuntu2] | 17:19 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mongodb [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:3.4.14-3ubuntu2] | 17:20 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-7 [source] (bionic-proposed) [7.3.0-16ubuntu1] | 17:20 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dtkwidget [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.0.7.2-2] | 17:21 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-mate-meta [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.222] | 17:21 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: hugo (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.37.1-1 => 0.38-1] (no packageset) (sync) | 17:26 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted hugo [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.38-1] | 17:26 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: foxtrotgps (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.2.0-1build2 => 1.2.1-1] (no packageset) (sync) | 18:00 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted foxtrotgps [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.1-1] | 18:01 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-oslo.privsep (bionic-proposed/main) [1.27.0-0ubuntu2 => 1.27.0-0ubuntu3] (ubuntu-server) | 18:01 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gtkhash (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.1-1 => 1.1.1-2] (ubuntu-mate) (sync) | 18:02 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apcupsd (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.14.14-1 => 3.14.14-2] (no packageset) (sync) | 18:02 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apcupsd [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.14.14-2] | 18:03 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pandas (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.22.0-2 => 0.22.0-2ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 18:10 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pandas [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.22.0-2ubuntu1] | 18:11 | |
rbasak | Please could some reject mongodb 1:3.4.14-3ubuntu2 from Bionic unapproved? It's been superseded (a 1:3.4.14-3ubuntu2 has already gone in). | 18:26 |
slangasek | rbasak: done | 18:35 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mongodb [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:3.4.14-3ubuntu2] | 18:36 | |
rbasak | Thanks! | 18:38 |
ginggs | slangasek: pandas tests/io/test_pytables.py::TestHDFStore::test_encoding Bus error (core dumped) in case you are inclined | 18:38 |
slangasek | ginggs: on armhf? | 18:39 |
ginggs | slangasek: yes, I meant to write that. You seem to be good at fixing alignment issues | 18:39 |
slangasek | ginggs: yeah but pandas was already removed from armhf over these issues and I'm not in a hurry to bring it back | 18:40 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected livecd-rootfs [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.520] | 18:40 | |
slangasek | ginggs: IIRC I looked at it a while ago and couldn't isolate which library actually contained the bug, in the stack of a half dozen | 18:40 |
ginggs | slangasek: ok, how about an alignment error in an R package then? :) r-cran-memoise | 18:42 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.521] | 18:42 | |
slangasek | ginggs: so basically at this point, it's safe to assume that any armhf sigbuses left in update_excuses are ones that I've looked at and walked away from ;) | 18:45 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: golang-github-spf13-afero (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0.2-1 => 1.1.0-1] (no packageset) (sync) | 18:48 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted golang-github-spf13-afero [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.0-1] | 18:48 | |
ginggs | slangasek: :) | 18:48 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debdelta (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.60 => 0.61] (no packageset) (sync) | 18:51 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted debdelta [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.61] | 18:51 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libnfs (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.11.0-3 => 2.0.0-1~exp1] (kubuntu) (sync) | 20:05 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: strace (bionic-proposed/main) [4.19-1ubuntu2 => 4.21-1ubuntu1] (core) | 20:08 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ryu (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15-0ubuntu1 => 4.15-0ubuntu2] (ubuntu-server) | 20:19 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-5 (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.5.0-11ubuntu1 => 5.5.0-12ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 20:22 | |
=== sergiusens_ is now known as sergiusens | ||
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libbpp-qt (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.3.2-1build1 => 2.4.0-1] (no packageset) (sync) | 20:22 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-5 [source] (bionic-proposed) [5.5.0-12ubuntu1] | 20:22 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libbpp-qt [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-1] | 20:22 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: bppsuite (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.3.2-1build1 => 2.4.0-1] (no packageset) (sync) | 20:23 | |
doko | jbicha: did you become a debian-med member? ;p | 20:23 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted bppsuite [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-1] | 20:24 | |
jbicha | no, just slightly cleaning up after them | 20:24 |
jbicha | depending on how big of a hurry you're in, you could remove bppphyview and physamp until debian-med cares enough about them to make them buildable again | 20:25 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-qt [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-1] (no packageset) | 20:26 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-qt [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-1] (no packageset) | 20:26 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-qt [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-1] (no packageset) | 20:27 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-qt [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-1] (no packageset) | 20:27 | |
jbicha | maybe ignore physamp 1.0.3-1's autopkgtests too | 20:27 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-qt [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-1] (no packageset) | 20:28 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-qt [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-1] (no packageset) | 20:28 | |
=== broder_ is now known as broder | ||
=== powersj_ is now known as powersj | ||
=== tumbleweed_ is now known as tumbleweed | ||
=== icey_ is now known as icey | ||
=== wolsen_ is now known as wolsen | ||
slangasek | better in general to remove a package than to knowingly regress autopkgtests | 20:28 |
slangasek | doko: I didn't see an answer to my question about removals of non-buggy packages from -proposed that are blocked by missing deps. What policy do you think we should be applying here? | 20:31 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-7-cross-ports (bionic-proposed/universe) [16ubuntu2 => 16ubuntu3] (no packageset) | 20:35 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: slic3r-prusa (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.39.0+dfsg-1 => 1.39.1+dfsg-3] (no packageset) (sync) | 20:35 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-7-cross (bionic-proposed/main) [20ubuntu2 => 20ubuntu3] (ubuntu-desktop) | 20:36 | |
doko | hmm, keeping them there makes people look at them again and again. otoh removing will need manual actual by looking into debian | 20:36 |
doko | still curious why gcc-7-cross is a desktop package | 20:36 |
tsimonq2 | doko: bug 1683749, perhaps. | 20:36 |
ubot5` | bug 1683749 in britney "Please list bugs tagged as "update-excuse" on update_excuses" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1683749 | 20:36 |
doko | well, starts with g* ;p | 20:36 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted slic3r-prusa [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.39.1+dfsg-3] | 20:37 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-7-cross-ports [source] (bionic-proposed) [16ubuntu3] | 20:37 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-qt [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-1] | 20:38 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-qt [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-1] | 20:38 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-qt [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-1] | 20:38 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-qt [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-1] | 20:38 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-qt [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-1] | 20:38 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-qt [i386] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-1] | 20:38 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-meta-oem [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0.1002.3] | 20:38 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1002.3] | 20:38 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-oem [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1002.3] | 20:38 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-7-cross [source] (bionic-proposed) [20ubuntu3] | 20:38 | |
slangasek | doko: yes, that is the tradeoff. If we're going to kick them out of -proposed, perhaps we should keep a list somewhere else and revisit (or automatically process) a few times during the cycle? | 20:40 |
slangasek | doko: but certainly if we are going to remove packages from -proposed that are not-buggy-but-blocked, nearly everything else > 90 days should also be removed | 20:41 |
jbicha | yes please keep a list | 20:41 |
doko | the list sounds fine | 20:41 |
slangasek | doko: where would you like to put this list? | 20:42 |
jbicha | there won't necessarily be a new Debian upload since it's a dependency that's broken in some of these cases not the package itself | 20:42 |
slangasek | jbicha: precisely | 20:42 |
doko | if you remove them, can you revive these packages by some copy magic? | 20:42 |
slangasek | doko: yes, absolutely | 20:42 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: bind-dyndb-ldap (bionic-proposed/universe) [11.1-1 => 11.1-2] (no packageset) (sync) | 20:43 | |
doko | slangasek: keep it in a place where I can write =) | 20:43 |
slangasek | doko: the wiki? the sync-blacklist branch? | 20:43 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted bind-dyndb-ldap [sync] (bionic-proposed) [11.1-2] | 20:44 | |
doko | sync-blocklist would make sense | 20:44 |
slangasek | doko: also I don't know a good way to query the list of packages that you have recently removed; I know grafana-zabbix only because it was such an outlier, but I think it probably wasn't the only one | 20:44 |
doko | I'll look in my shell history. will prepare a list tomrrow and send it to you | 20:46 |
slangasek | doko: thanks | 20:46 |
slangasek | doko: https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-archive/+junk/sync-blacklist/view/head:/extra-removals.txt | 20:48 |
tsimonq2 | I really wish we could see who accepts/rejects a package and why, while we're at it. Would LP be the right thing to file against, or does a separate piece of tooling handle queue management? | 20:49 |
LocutusOfBorg | g'night folks! | 20:49 |
* tsimonq2 waves to LocutusOfBorg | 20:49 | |
slangasek | tsimonq2: yes, LP | 20:49 |
slangasek | tsimonq2: removals are documented in the history however | 20:50 |
tsimonq2 | slangasek: Correct, in the publishing history. | 20:50 |
slangasek | ah yes you said accepts/rejects not accepts/removals, ignore me | 20:51 |
tsimonq2 | slangasek: So I can be specific in the bug report, Soyuz? | 20:51 |
slangasek | tsimonq2: yes | 20:51 |
tsimonq2 | slangasek: okl | 20:51 |
slangasek | (not sure if that matters) | 20:51 |
tsimonq2 | *ok | 20:51 |
tsimonq2 | ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ | 20:51 |
doko | ginggs: now nodejs migrated, and I see js tests failing ... https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-bionic/bionic/armhf/s/sphinx/20180411_204814_f63f9@/log.gz | 20:53 |
tsimonq2 | slangasek: bug 1763174, how's it look? | 20:53 |
ubot5` | bug 1763174 in Launchpad itself "Soyuz should document acceptions/rejections from the queue" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1763174 | 20:53 |
doko | ;p | 20:53 |
slangasek | tsimonq2: no opinion ;) | 20:54 |
tsimonq2 | slangasek: No opinion on the clarity of the bug report and how accurately it describes the current situation at hand, as well as what's desired? ;) | 20:55 |
slangasek | yep! | 20:55 |
tsimonq2 | Alright. :) | 20:55 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gtkhash [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.1-2] | 20:55 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libnfs [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.0.0-1~exp1] | 20:55 | |
tsimonq2 | slangasek: Assigned it to myself; it'll probably be handled post-18.04 but ideally before the floodgates open, much like bug 1654761. | 20:56 |
ubot5` | bug 1654761 in Auto Package Testing "Make sure duplicate tests cannot be queued" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1654761 | 20:56 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libnfs [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.0.0-1~exp1] (kubuntu) | 20:58 | |
* tsimonq2 wonders how quick the Calculating Camel will be announced... | 20:58 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libnfs [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.0.0-1~exp1] (kubuntu) | 20:59 | |
tsimonq2 | slangasek: Would you happen to know where I can find the autoaccepter script? | 20:59 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libnfs [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.0.0-1~exp1] (kubuntu) | 21:00 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libnfs [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.0.0-1~exp1] (kubuntu) | 21:00 | |
tsimonq2 | lp:ubuntu-archive-publishing? | 21:00 |
ginggs | tsimonq2: see sphinx autopkgtest failures http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/sphinx/bionic/armhf - related to your nodejs? | 21:01 |
slangasek | tsimonq2: I don't know; afaik stgraber operates it | 21:01 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libnfs [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.0.0-1~exp1] (kubuntu) | 21:01 | |
tsimonq2 | ginggs: I'm not sure; are we talking about the nodejs you synced in my name? ;P | 21:02 |
tsimonq2 | slangasek: ack, he's on vac? | 21:03 |
cyphermox | yes | 21:03 |
tsimonq2 | Ok, I'll ping next week. | 21:03 |
slangasek | tsimonq2: so he said | 21:03 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libnfs [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [2.0.0-1~exp1] | 21:04 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libnfs [i386] (bionic-proposed) [2.0.0-1~exp1] | 21:04 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libnfs [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [2.0.0-1~exp1] | 21:04 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libnfs [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [2.0.0-1~exp1] | 21:04 | |
tsimonq2 | nodejs> To be serious here, I'm not entirely sure what the problem is with those tests. | 21:04 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libnfs [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [2.0.0-1~exp1] | 21:04 | |
ginggs | doko: FAILURES / test_build_sphinx / ModuleNotFoundError: No module named \'distutils.core\' | 21:04 |
tsimonq2 | Right, why would that be nodejs? | 21:05 |
doko | oops | 21:07 |
doko | but just armhf? | 21:07 |
ginggs | doko: the others haven't run yet - (well ppc64el and s390x did, but they always fail) | 21:09 |
=== sergiusens_ is now known as sergiusens | ||
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sphinx (bionic-proposed/main) [1.6.7-1 => 1.6.7-1ubuntu1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-server) | 21:13 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sphinx [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.6.7-1ubuntu1] | 21:16 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted strace [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.21-1ubuntu1] | 21:16 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-oslo.privsep [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.27.0-0ubuntu3] | 21:16 | |
=== sergiusens_ is now known as sergiusens | ||
=== sergiusens_ is now known as sergiusens | ||
Bashing-om | TJ-: Watching in #ubuntu-release. heavy discussion on the release testing schedules . | 21:34 |
tsimonq2 | Bashing-om: "heavy discussion"? :) | 21:35 |
Bashing-om | opps wrong window ^ // Yeah .. been a bit following what yall are discussing . | 21:36 |
tsimonq2 | Maybe on the mailing list, but unless I missed something, not here? | 21:36 |
Bashing-om | tsimonq2: mailing list for the most part . some reference here .. else I would not have much of a clue :) | 21:37 |
tsimonq2 | Bashing-om: I assume I can continue this conversation with you in #ubuntu-discuss? ;) | 21:38 |
Bashing-om | tsimonq2: Yes my mentor . I await . | 21:38 |
=== sergiusens_ is now known as sergiusens | ||
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnocchi (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.2.0-0ubuntu2 => 4.2.0-0ubuntu3] (no packageset) | 21:49 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnocchi [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.2.0-0ubuntu3] | 21:50 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gpaw (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.3.0-2 => 1.3.0-2ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 21:57 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gpaw [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.3.0-2ubuntu1] | 21:58 | |
ginggs | doko: will you send that gpaw fix to debian please? | 22:03 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-testtools (bionic-proposed/main) [2.3.0-3ubuntu1 => 2.3.0-3ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) | 22:03 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-future (bionic-proposed/main) [0.15.2-4ubuntu1 => 0.15.2-4ubuntu2] (ubuntu-server) | 22:09 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-future [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.15.2-4ubuntu2] | 22:11 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-testtools [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.3.0-3ubuntu2] | 22:11 | |
doko | ginggs: yes | 22:11 |
ginggs | doko: :) I was waiting for the problem to appear in ubuntu | 22:12 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libunity (bionic-proposed/main) [7.1.4+18.04.20180209.1-0ubuntu1 => 7.1.4+18.04.20180209.1-0ubuntu2] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) | 22:21 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libunity [source] (bionic-proposed) [7.1.4+18.04.20180209.1-0ubuntu2] | 22:24 | |
ginggs | doko: you get a panda! arm64 you get a panda! s390x you get a panda! \o/ everyone gets pandas! except you, armhf, you and your silly bus error | 22:34 |
slangasek | armhf, TI already gave you pandas | 22:34 |
valorie | aren't we handing out beavers this round? | 22:36 |
tsimonq2 | I want camels :P | 22:36 |
valorie | lol | 22:36 |
xnox | shit, cancel order of 100s of pandas | 22:36 |
tsimonq2 | hahahahahahaa | 22:36 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-7 (bionic-proposed/main) [7.3.0-16ubuntu1 => 7.3.0-16ubuntu2] (core) | 22:47 | |
mwhudson | i have a broken pandaboard if anyone is feeling left out | 22:48 |
mwhudson | i think technically it belongs to linaro | 22:48 |
xnox | I went to zoo in Hong Kong and saw a very sad panda | 22:49 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-7 [source] (bionic-proposed) [7.3.0-16ubuntu2] | 22:49 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oem [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.15.0-1002.3] (kernel) | 22:56 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1002.3] | 23:08 | |
ginggs | I went to a zoo that only had a dog | 23:08 |
tsimonq2 | hahahaha | 23:09 |
ginggs | it was a shih tzu | 23:09 |
tsimonq2 | xnox: Sad pandas are bad. You cheered it up, I hope? | 23:09 |
doko | they have limits on noise levels over there | 23:13 |
tsimonq2 | Ah. | 23:15 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!