[00:03] <slangasek> acheronuk, tsimonq2: ok, I think the regular dm and ubiquity having different opinions about which tty to run on may at least be contributing to the issue - in particular, I see that if display-manager doesn't Conflicts=getty@tty1.service, getty@tty1.service tries to start in parallel with ubiquity.service, which is going to be bad
[00:03] <slangasek> acheronuk, tsimonq2: so I think from the ubiquity side, we solve this by adding that Conflicts to ubiquity.service; but that sddm also changing would be sensible; I'll test the first part here
[00:08] <tsimonq2> slangasek: ack
[00:10] <slangasek> tsimonq2: that worked on the first go
[00:10] <slangasek> so I'll push that change
[00:10] <slangasek> (for review, at least)
[00:11] <tsimonq2> ok
[00:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mate-settings-daemon (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.20.1-0ubuntu1 => 1.20.1-2ubuntu1] (ubuntu-mate)
[00:13] <acheronuk> slangasek: thank you.
[00:13] <acheronuk> good night
[00:18] <slangasek> infinity, cyphermox: one of you care to review https://code.launchpad.net/~vorlon/ubiquity/conflict-with-getty1/+merge/342977 ?
[00:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: buildbot (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.1-3ubuntu3 => 1.1.1-3ubuntu4] (no packageset)
[00:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted buildbot [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.1-3ubuntu4]
[00:23] <doko> what's wrong wih systemd on arm64?
[00:28] <cyphermox> slangasek: yay
[00:29] <cyphermox> slangasek: is your other MP, for regain_privileges(), ready too?
[00:29] <cyphermox> infinity wanted to have a look and better understand it
[00:33] <slangasek> cyphermox: I haven't gotten feedback yet on that one, I suggest leaving it
[00:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xubuntu-community-artwork (bionic-proposed/universe) [16.04.0 => 18.04.0] (ubuntustudio, xubuntu)
[01:13] <slangasek> doko: why did primer3 need a no-change rebuild?
[01:15] <doko> slangasek: I had the impression that this was needed to drop the s390x test rebuilds
[01:15] <slangasek> ok
[01:15] <slangasek> it didn't drop them
[01:15] <slangasek> :)
[01:15] <slangasek> oh, test rebuilds
[01:16] <slangasek> so unrelated to the autopkgtests?
[01:18] <doko> no, I really mean autopkgtests
[01:18] <slangasek> ok
[01:19] <slangasek> doko: incidentally, Debian bug #850065 looks relevant on openfoam, apparently this package doesn't obey the build env's guidance around parallelization
[01:19] <ubot5`> Debian bug 850065 in src:openfoam "openfoam: Build runs way more parallel processes than specified by DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS" [Important,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/850065
[01:23] <doko> slangasek: this is unrelated, caused by make 4.2. I removed that for Ubuntu proposed
[01:24] <slangasek> doko: I don't think so?  That bug report is a year old
[01:25] <doko> hmm
[01:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (bionic-proposed/main) [18.2-4-g05926e48-0ubuntu1 => 18.2-4-g05926e48-0ubuntu2] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server)
[02:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: peony (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.0-0ubuntu1 => 1.1.1-0ubuntu1] (ubuntukylin)
[02:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (bionic-proposed) [18.2-4-g05926e48-0ubuntu2]
[02:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted peony [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.1-0ubuntu1]
[02:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mate-settings-daemon [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.20.1-2ubuntu1]
[02:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xubuntu-community-artwork [source] (bionic-proposed) [18.04.0]
[02:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xubuntu-community-artwork [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [18.04.0] (ubuntustudio, xubuntu)
[02:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xubuntu-community-artwork [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [18.04.0]
[03:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd-glib (bionic-proposed/main) [1.38-1 => 1.39-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[04:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: atf-allwinner (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0.apritzel.81-1 => 1.0.apritzel.81-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[04:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted atf-allwinner [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.apritzel.81-1ubuntu1]
[04:12] <slangasek> LocutusOfBorg: is rollup bootstrap still on your radar?  by grepping logs I found you asked for node-rollup-plugin-commonjs 9.0 to be kicked out of -proposed; is that still the right thing to do?
[04:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: atf-allwinner [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0.apritzel.81-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[04:21] <slangasek> tsimonq2: any plans for telepathy-qt?
[04:41] <slangasek>         uint64_t k1 = gu_le64(blocks[i]);
[04:41] <slangasek>  // Block read - if your platform needs to do endian-swapping or can only
[04:41] <slangasek>  // handle aligned reads, do the conversion here
[04:41] <slangasek> aligned reads, you do not understand them
[06:22] <acheronuk> slangasek: is this possibly linked to the general (not ubiquity) switch to VT1? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1762885
[06:22] <ubot5`> Ubuntu bug 1762885 in sddm (Ubuntu) "SDDM fails to start on laptops modern NVidia cards" [Undecided,New]
[06:23] <acheronuk> or just maybe general nvidia ****iness
[07:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (bionic-proposed/main) [2.519 => 2.520] (desktop-core)
[07:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: krita (bionic-proposed/universe) [1:4.0.0+dfsg-0ubuntu1 => 1:4.0.1+dfsg-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[08:03] <Laney> doko: rfc thing> I know, I filed a bug and pinged Till about it, new ghostscript broke it
[08:08] <LocutusOfBorg> yes slangasek it is still the right thing, unfortunately
[08:08] <LocutusOfBorg> I could finish the bootstrap, but no change rebuilding the package ends to different/unworking content
[08:08] <LocutusOfBorg> so I don't want to do an archive publishing with something that starts from a "npm install" on my pc
[08:09] <LocutusOfBorg> so, kicking up commonjs will prevent this bug https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=892742
[08:09] <ubot5`> Debian bug 892742 in src:node-rollup "rollup FTBFS with node-rollup-plugin-commonjs 9.0" [Serious,Open]
[08:09] <LocutusOfBorg> but we will stuck with: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=892133
[08:09] <ubot5`> Debian bug 892133 in node-rollup "node-rollup: does not work after a no-change rebuild (the one in the archive is not suitable for main?)" [Serious,Open]
[08:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: command-not-found (bionic-proposed/main) [18.04.0 => 18.04.1] (core)
[08:35] <LocutusOfBorg> hello, wrt remmina in queue, upstream asked me to do the merge, they feel confident about the release, and they would appreciate it being part of bionic
[08:36] <LocutusOfBorg> while this is not a bug-fix only release, it is true that new features are related to "new plugins", without changing the actual code
[08:37] <LocutusOfBorg> and there is a serious ssh bug fixed in this release
[08:37] <LocutusOfBorg> with lots of RDP crashes fixes, and some ubuntu patch merged upstream
[08:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected command-not-found [source] (bionic-proposed) [18.04.1]
[08:50] <apw> ^ rejecting as there is some expected change which needs investigation
[08:50] <LocutusOfBorg> Laney, did you find the "hey can't retry failed update-notifier on armhf tests" written above? :)
[08:51] <LocutusOfBorg> my mind is blowing because of that :D
[08:51] <Laney> no
[08:55] <Laney> weird though, that call is doing archive.getPublishedSources
[08:56] <LocutusOfBorg> rmadison shows it as published
[08:56] <LocutusOfBorg> also, britney
[08:58] <LocutusOfBorg> are we somewhat confusing update-manager and update-notifier?
[08:58] <LocutusOfBorg> or... epoch issue?
[09:00] <LocutusOfBorg> oh I can schedule a test against 0.189 and not 0.190
[09:12] <Laney> https://api.launchpad.net/1.0/ubuntu/+archive/primary?distro_series=https%3A%2F%2Fapi.launchpad.net%2F1.0%2Fubuntu%2Fbionic&version=3.190&status=Published&source_name=update-notifier&ws.op=getPublishedSources
[09:12] <Laney> this is what we're hitting
[09:13] <Laney> what's wrong with that then?
[09:14] <LocutusOfBorg> You submitted an invalid request: update-notifier/3.190 is not published in bionic
[09:15] <LocutusOfBorg> maybe bionic-proposed?
[09:15] <LocutusOfBorg> oh, this works indeed https://api.launchpad.net/1.0/ubuntu/+archive/primary?distro_series=https%3A%2F%2Fapi.launchpad.net%2F1.0%2Fubuntu%2Fbionic&version=3.189&status=Published&source_name=update-notifier&ws.op=getPublishedSources
[09:16] <Laney> yes, and if you remove the version it shows 3.190
[09:16] <LocutusOfBorg> maybe publisher was killed while publishing and didn't retry to do something?
[09:16] <Laney> so I need to understand what the problem is there
[09:18] <cjwatson> bad serialisation
[09:18] <cjwatson> you're sending version as a float
[09:18] <cjwatson> should be version=%223.190%22
[09:19] <cjwatson> otherwise it turns into 3.19 ...
[09:19] <LocutusOfBorg> LOOOOOOOOOOOOL
[09:19] <LocutusOfBorg> good catch! :)
[09:20] <cjwatson> I guess you're constructing the query manually rather than using launchpadlib here?
[09:21] <cjwatson> also, you should really add &exact_match=true
[09:21] <Laney> it's doing         if version is not None:
[09:21] <Laney>             req['version'] = version
[09:21] <cjwatson> can you point me to the code?
[09:21] <Laney> https://git.launchpad.net/autopkgtest-cloud/tree/webcontrol/request/submit.py#n256
[09:22] <cjwatson> right, so you're constructing the request yourself and not doing the marshalling properly
[09:24] <cjwatson> let me see where the canonical code for this is
[09:27] <Laney> cheers, didn't occur to me that this wasn't being treated as a string
[09:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (xenial-proposed/main) [2.31.2 => 2.32.3.1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[09:27] <Laney> I'll add exact_match: true too
[09:28]  * apw giggles, those are so the hardest things to see
[09:30] <LocutusOfBorg> mmm I see nvidia test is not ignored on armhf, but why britney started complaining now, with a test that seems to have been failing since the begin on armhf?
[09:30] <LocutusOfBorg> http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/n/nvidia-graphics-drivers-340/bionic/armhf
[09:31] <cjwatson> Laney: Right, so everything except binary parameters and option values (the latter including ws.op and enumerations like status='Published') should be run through json.dumps
[09:32] <cjwatson> Laney: Switching to launchpadlib would be best if at all possible, but if you really really can't then you'll have to sprinkle json.dumps around
[09:34] <cjwatson> The way it nearly works but not quite if you don't follow that protocol is certainly unfortunate
[09:34] <apw> LocutusOfBorg, that is odd, as the summary does imply it has never passed, and other mentions of that package/version for armhf are always failed
[09:34] <apw> Laney, is the package/series/arch page complete, ie are all runs considered by britney on there ?  http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/n/nvidia-graphics-drivers-340/bionic/armhf
[09:35] <Laney> should be
[09:35] <Laney> maybe there's a problem in britney if anyone fancies looking at that
[09:35] <apw> hrm, then it is perplexing that britney is calling that nvidia-g-d-340/armhf a regression, only for patch
[09:36] <Laney> that's where the "is this a regression?" logic lives
[09:37] <apw> right it is per-package, but ... that package has never passed either
[09:37] <apw> it is per trigger package, but that trigger package, test package combination has never passed either
[09:37] <apw> (to be more accurate)
[09:37] <apw> well not if that list is complete
[09:37] <LocutusOfBorg> or maybe somebody deleted the hint in the last few days?
[09:38] <LocutusOfBorg> but I don't know how to "git log -p" in bzr
[09:38] <apw> bzr log -p ?
[09:38] <apw> it never passes in artful either
[09:38] <LocutusOfBorg> damn, it never stops, but it is enough
[09:38] <LocutusOfBorg> -force-badtest nvidia-graphics-drivers-340/all/armhf
[09:38] <LocutusOfBorg> -# Force nvidia-graphics-drivers-390 in, because new armhf packages being uninstallable is way less important than libglvnd being broken.
[09:39] <LocutusOfBorg> pitti
[09:39] <Laney> Certainly looks to me like it should be alwaysfailed, but like I say it needs someone to look into it
[09:39] <Laney> and if nobody wants to, then I guess add the hint back :-)
[09:40] <LocutusOfBorg> maybe slangasek removed too much of that file in this revision? https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-release/britney/hints-ubuntu/revision/2976
[09:41] <apw> cirtainly it seems reasonable to hint it given it should to all reading be alwaysfail
[09:41] <apw> perhaps i should add it but with a reason of "britney needs invesitgaing@
[09:44] <apw> Laney, i am wondeirng if s-langasek is using a script wihch checks if the version in the hint matches the archive, and all != version and it gets removed.
[09:44] <apw> Laney, or if he is just removing all /all/ hints so that we see if they are needed and readd them
[09:46] <apw> oh that one is under "vivid" so i can see how one might ... anyhow ... readding with a current comment
[09:47] <apw> OH OH we got some team hints ... yay
[09:48] <apw> LocutusOfBorg, hinted again
[09:49] <sil2100> Oh, I just now noticed I have my own hint file in britney, huh
[09:49]  * sil2100 always used Steve's
[09:49] <apw> sil2100, heh you should indeed, but ... now we have team ones, general hints seem more appropriate there
[09:50] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks!
[09:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted glib2.0 [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.56.1-2ubuntu1]
[09:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted plasma-framework [source] (bionic-proposed) [5.44.0-0ubuntu3]
[09:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted vte2.91 [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.52.1-1ubuntu1]
[09:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-disk-utility [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.1-0ubuntu1]
[09:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted remmina [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.0-rcgit.29+dfsg-1ubuntu1]
[10:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (artful-proposed/main) [2.31.2+17.10 => 2.32.3.1+17.10] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[10:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (bionic-proposed/main) [2.32+18.04 => 2.32.3.1+18.04] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[10:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (trusty-proposed/universe) [2.31.2~14.04 => 2.32.3.1~14.04] (no packageset)
[10:08]  * apw will review all those snapd updates ^
[10:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kmod [sync] (xenial-security) [22-1ubuntu5]
[10:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: bijiben (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.28.0-1 => 3.28.1-1] (desktop-extra) (sync)
[10:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shotwell (bionic-proposed/main) [0.28.1-0ubuntu1 => 0.28.2-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[10:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dtkcore (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.0.7-1 => 2.0.7.1-3] (lubuntu) (sync)
[10:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-sound-recorder (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.27.90-1 => 3.28.1-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[10:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-sound-recorder [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.1-1]
[10:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-shell-extension-taskbar (bionic-proposed/universe) [56.0-1 => 57.0-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[10:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-shell-extension-taskbar [sync] (bionic-proposed) [57.0-1]
[10:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: evince (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.0-1 => 3.28.2-1] (ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[10:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: evolution-ews (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.28.0-1 => 3.28.1-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[10:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: evolution (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.28.0-4 => 3.28.1-1] (ubuntukylin) (sync)
[10:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted evolution-ews [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.1-1]
[11:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected snapd [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.32]
[11:00] <apw> ^ snapd superceeded in the queue
[11:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (xenial-proposed/main) [2.31.2 => 2.32.3.2] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[11:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected neutron [source] (xenial-proposed) [2:8.4.0-0ubuntu7.3]
[11:02] <apw> ^ neutron superceeded in the queue by the same version with more changes
[11:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: evolution-data-server (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.0-2ubuntu2 => 3.28.1-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[11:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (artful-proposed/main) [2.31.2+17.10 => 2.32.3.2+17.10] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[11:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (trusty-proposed/universe) [2.31.2~14.04 => 2.32.3.2~14.04] (no packageset)
[11:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (bionic-proposed/main) [2.32+18.04 => 2.32.3.2+18.04] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[11:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected snapd [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.32.3.1+18.04]
[11:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected snapd [source] (artful-proposed) [2.32.3.1+17.10]
[11:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected snapd [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.32.3.1]
[11:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected snapd [source] (trusty-proposed) [2.32.3.1~14.04]
[11:11] <apw> ^ snapd* superceeded in the queue, again
[11:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-chess (bionic-proposed/universe) [1:3.28.0-2 => 1:3.28.1-1] (desktop-extra) (sync)
[11:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-maps (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.28.0-1 => 3.28.1-1] (desktop-extra, ubuntu-budgie, ubuntugnome) (sync)
[11:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libdazzle (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.0-1 => 3.28.1-1] (ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[11:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libsoup2.4 (bionic-proposed/main) [2.62.0-1 => 2.62.1-1] (core) (sync)
[11:52] <darkxst> Laney, https://bileto.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/3230
[11:52] <darkxst> include libzip 1.5.1 release from today
[11:53] <darkxst> for bug 1674057
[11:53] <ubot5`> bug 1674057 in libzip (Ubuntu) "[FFe] upgrade libzip to version 1.5.0" [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1674057
[11:54] <Laney> darkxst: thx
[11:54] <Laney> looks like you missed the bug reference in libzip
[11:54] <Laney> i'll try to look later on
[11:54] <Laney> (anyone else on the team should feel free though)
[12:01] <darkxst> Laney, hmm so I did, but can't fix it while its in a ppa
[12:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ecj (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.12.3-1 => 3.13.2-1] (kubuntu) (sync)
[12:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python3-defaults (bionic-proposed/main) [3.6.5-2 => 3.6.5-3] (core) (sync)
[12:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: jericho-html (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.2-1 => 3.2-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[12:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted jericho-html [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.2-2]
[12:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted atf-allwinner [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.apritzel.81-1ubuntu1]
[12:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ecj [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.13.2-1]
[12:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python3-defaults [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.6.5-3]
[12:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (bionic-proposed/main) [2.519 => 2.521] (desktop-core)
[12:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.32.3.2+18.04]
[12:42] <rbasak> Deriving from something licensed under Expat and then releasing the result under Apache-2.0 is fine, right?
[12:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (artful-proposed) [2.32.3.2+17.10]
[12:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.32.3.2]
[12:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (trusty-proposed) [2.32.3.2~14.04]
[13:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kmod (trusty-proposed/main) [15-0ubuntu6 => 15-0ubuntu7] (core)
[13:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sysprof (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.28.0-1 => 3.28.1-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[13:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: webkit2gtk (bionic-proposed/main) [2.20.0-2ubuntu1 => 2.20.1-1] (desktop-core) (sync)
[13:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kicad (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.0.7+dfsg1-1ubuntu1 => 4.0.7+dfsg1-1ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[13:46] <infinity> rbasak: Yes.
[13:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sysprof [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.1-1]
[13:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zenity (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.0-1 => 3.28.1-1] (ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[13:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kicad [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.0.7+dfsg1-1ubuntu2]
[13:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: golang-github-sanity-io-litter (bionic-proposed/primary) [1.1.0+git20171129.f8fd6a5-1]
[13:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: golang-github-alecthomas-chroma (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.3.0-1 => 0.4.0+git20180402.51d250f-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[13:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted golang-github-alecthomas-chroma [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.4.0+git20180402.51d250f-1]
[13:51] <rbasak> infinity: thanks. Apache-2.0 always seemed a bit weird to me so I thought I'd make sure.
[13:55] <infinity> rbasak: It's not really about the Apache license, but rather that anything under the MIT/X11/Expat license can have pretty much anything done to it, so long as you retain the copyright.
[13:56] <infinity> rbasak: See the Windows TCP stack from 1993 to 2000 or so as an example.
[13:56] <infinity> (Well, that was BSD, but same concept)
[14:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ca-certificates (bionic-proposed/main) [20170717 => 20180409] (core) (sync)
[14:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ca-certificates [sync] (bionic-proposed) [20180409]
[14:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted zenity [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.1-1]
[14:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted webkit2gtk [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.20.1-1]
[14:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted bijiben [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.1-1]
[14:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted evince [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.2-1]
[14:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted evolution [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.1-1]
[14:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-maps [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.1-1]
[14:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libsoup2.4 [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.62.1-1]
[14:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dtkcore [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.0.7.1-3]
[14:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-chess [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1:3.28.1-1]
[14:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted shotwell [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.28.2-0ubuntu1]
[14:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted evolution-data-server [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.1-1ubuntu1]
[14:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libdazzle [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.1-1]
[14:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-phyl [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-1] (no packageset)
[14:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-phyl [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-1] (no packageset)
[14:36] <juliank> Should we ignore the ganeti failure for i386 for socat? This thing failed before with the same error messages
[14:36] <juliank> it only worked 3 times so far
[14:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-phyl [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-1] (no packageset)
[14:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-phyl [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-1] (no packageset)
[14:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-desktop3 (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.0-0ubuntu1 => 3.28.1-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[14:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-phyl [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-1] (no packageset)
[15:01] <LocutusOfBorg> please accept mongodb, fixing a stupid mistake on my side
[15:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mongodb (bionic-proposed/universe) [1:3.4.14-3ubuntu1 => 1:3.4.14-3ubuntu2] (mozilla)
[15:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-phyl [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-1] (no packageset)
[15:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-sanity-io-litter [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.0+git20171129.f8fd6a5-1]
[15:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-phyl [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-1]
[15:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-phyl [i386] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-1]
[15:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-phyl [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-1]
[15:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-phyl [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-1]
[15:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-phyl [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-1]
[15:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-phyl [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-1]
[15:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-sanity-io-litter [amd64] (bionic-proposed/none) [1.1.0+git20171129.f8fd6a5-1] (no packageset)
[15:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sddm (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.17.0-1ubuntu2 => 0.17.0-1ubuntu3] (kubuntu)
[15:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-sanity-io-litter [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.0+git20171129.f8fd6a5-1]
[15:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mongodb (bionic-proposed/universe) [1:3.4.14-3ubuntu1 => 1:3.4.14-3ubuntu2] (mozilla)
[15:38] <slangasek> acheronuk: the hybrid videa issue is unlikely to be related to the VT configuration.  But I guess you could ask people to retest with an sddm that does start on VT1?
[15:39] <slangasek> LocutusOfBorg: ok, node-rollup-plugin-commonjs removed from -proposed
[15:45] <slangasek> LocutusOfBorg, apw: I don't currently have good scripting when removing the hints... but http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/n/nvidia-graphics-drivers-340/bionic/armhf shows no passes, so I assumed it was wrong to hint a non-regression
[15:45] <slangasek> so, we can add it back, sure
[15:46] <slangasek> but it seems that's cleared up somehow in the meantime?
[15:46] <Laney> there is something interesting with regression / alwaysfailed calculation
[15:47] <Laney> python3-defaults is showing "autopkgtest for glib2.0: amd64: Test in progress (always failed), arm64: Test in progress (always failed), i386: Test in progress (always failed), ppc64el: Test in progress (always failed), s390x: Test in progress (always failed)"
[15:47] <Laney> always failed is lies
[15:48] <ginggs> slangasek: nvidia cleared up because it was hinted
[15:48] <slangasek> ginggs: ok, but under linux-meta-raspi2, nvidia-graphics-drivers-340/armhf shows as 'always failed', which is not based on hinting
[15:49] <slangasek> Laney: doh
[15:51] <apw> slangasek, that is under a linux-meta-* so it is not representative of reality
[15:52] <apw> slangasek, remember those are specially neutered for history
[15:52] <slangasek> apw: ah ok
[15:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: certmonger (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.79.5-3 => 0.79.5-3ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[15:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted certmonger [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.79.5-3ubuntu1]
[15:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.8.4+ds-1] (no packageset)
[15:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.8.4+ds-1] (no packageset)
[15:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.8.4+ds-1] (no packageset)
[16:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.8.4+ds-1] (no packageset)
[16:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.8.4+ds-1] (no packageset)
[16:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.8.4+ds-1] (no packageset)
[16:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: linux-meta-oem (bionic-proposed/primary) [4.15.0.1002.3]
[16:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: linux-oem (bionic-proposed/primary) [4.15.0-1002.3]
[16:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: linux-signed-oem (bionic-proposed/primary) [4.15.0-1002.3]
[16:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.8.4+ds-1]
[16:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.8.4+ds-1]
[16:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.8.4+ds-1]
[16:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin [i386] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.8.4+ds-1]
[16:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.8.4+ds-1]
[16:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.8.4+ds-1]
[16:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kmod [source] (trusty-proposed) [15-0ubuntu7]
[16:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: deepin-picker (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.6.2-1 => 1.6.2-3] (no packageset) (sync)
[16:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted deepin-picker [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.6.2-3]
[16:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dtkwidget (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.0.7-1 => 2.0.7.2-2] (lubuntu) (sync)
[16:35] <tsimonq2> slangasek: telepathy-qt> I knew I was forgetting something. :/  I'll look tonight.
[16:37] <slangasek> tsimonq2: k, thanks!
[16:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-phyl-omics [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-2] (no packageset)
[16:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-phyl-omics [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-2] (no packageset)
[16:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-phyl-omics [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-2] (no packageset)
[16:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-phyl-omics [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-2] (no packageset)
[16:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-phyl-omics [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-2] (no packageset)
[16:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-phyl-omics [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-2] (no packageset)
[16:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-taskflow (bionic-proposed/main) [3.1.0-0ubuntu1 => 3.1.0-0ubuntu2] (ubuntu-server)
[16:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-mate-meta (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.221 => 1.222] (ubuntu-mate)
[17:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-phyl-omics [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2]
[17:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-phyl-omics [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2]
[17:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-phyl-omics [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2]
[17:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-phyl-omics [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2]
[17:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-phyl-omics [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2]
[17:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-phyl-omics [i386] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-2]
[17:01] <ErichEickmeyer> infinity, slangasek: I'm Erich from the Ubuntu Studio team. On tsimonq2's advice, I need to give you a heads-up that Ubuntu Studio might not be LTS this release and only go 9-month. We are lacking manpower and are working on a refresh for 18.10 for a number of features, but we simply don't have the manpower for an LTS at this point in time.
[17:02] <tsimonq2> o/ ErichEickmeyer
[17:02] <slangasek> ErichEickmeyer: thanks for the info - from what tsimonq2 had said I thought it was an open question, but if you're definitively not doing an LTS I'm happy to make that adjustment now to the metadata
[17:02] <ErichEickmeyer> slangasek: It's an open question still.
[17:03] <ErichEickmeyer> I just got the email out to the ML to get a pulse check on the idea.
[17:03] <slangasek> ErichEickmeyer: you mean you might still change your minds and go LTS?
[17:03] <slangasek> ah you did say "might not"
[17:03] <slangasek> ok
[17:03] <ErichEickmeyer> Yeah, this mostly was a "heads up".
[17:04] <ErichEickmeyer> I also want to give sakrecoer the opportunity to advise on this since he's still the lead.
[17:06] <ErichEickmeyer> His time is limited, so I''ve been leading the charge on a number of things.
[17:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: stress-ng (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.09.23-1 => 0.09.24-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[17:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted stress-ng [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.09.24-1]
[17:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-7 (bionic-proposed/main) [7.3.0-15ubuntu2 => 7.3.0-16ubuntu1] (core)
[17:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-taskflow [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.1.0-0ubuntu2]
[17:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mongodb [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:3.4.14-3ubuntu2]
[17:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-7 [source] (bionic-proposed) [7.3.0-16ubuntu1]
[17:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dtkwidget [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.0.7.2-2]
[17:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-mate-meta [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.222]
[17:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: hugo (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.37.1-1 => 0.38-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[17:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted hugo [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.38-1]
[18:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: foxtrotgps (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.2.0-1build2 => 1.2.1-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[18:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted foxtrotgps [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.1-1]
[18:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-oslo.privsep (bionic-proposed/main) [1.27.0-0ubuntu2 => 1.27.0-0ubuntu3] (ubuntu-server)
[18:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gtkhash (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.1-1 => 1.1.1-2] (ubuntu-mate) (sync)
[18:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apcupsd (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.14.14-1 => 3.14.14-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[18:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apcupsd [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.14.14-2]
[18:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pandas (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.22.0-2 => 0.22.0-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[18:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pandas [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.22.0-2ubuntu1]
[18:26] <rbasak> Please could some reject mongodb 1:3.4.14-3ubuntu2 from Bionic unapproved? It's been superseded (a 1:3.4.14-3ubuntu2 has already gone in).
[18:35] <slangasek> rbasak: done
[18:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mongodb [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:3.4.14-3ubuntu2]
[18:38] <rbasak> Thanks!
[18:38] <ginggs> slangasek: pandas tests/io/test_pytables.py::TestHDFStore::test_encoding Bus error (core dumped) in case you are inclined
[18:39] <slangasek> ginggs: on armhf?
[18:39] <ginggs> slangasek: yes, I meant to write that.  You seem to be good at fixing alignment issues
[18:40] <slangasek> ginggs: yeah but pandas was already removed from armhf over these issues and I'm not in a hurry to bring it back
[18:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected livecd-rootfs [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.520]
[18:40] <slangasek> ginggs: IIRC I looked at it a while ago and couldn't isolate which library actually contained the bug, in the stack of a half dozen
[18:42] <ginggs> slangasek: ok, how about an alignment error in an R package then?  :) r-cran-memoise
[18:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.521]
[18:45] <slangasek> ginggs: so basically at this point, it's safe to assume that any armhf sigbuses left in update_excuses are ones that I've looked at and walked away from ;)
[18:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: golang-github-spf13-afero (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0.2-1 => 1.1.0-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[18:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted golang-github-spf13-afero [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.0-1]
[18:48] <ginggs> slangasek: :)
[18:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debdelta (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.60 => 0.61] (no packageset) (sync)
[18:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted debdelta [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.61]
[20:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libnfs (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.11.0-3 => 2.0.0-1~exp1] (kubuntu) (sync)
[20:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: strace (bionic-proposed/main) [4.19-1ubuntu2 => 4.21-1ubuntu1] (core)
[20:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ryu (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15-0ubuntu1 => 4.15-0ubuntu2] (ubuntu-server)
[20:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-5 (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.5.0-11ubuntu1 => 5.5.0-12ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[20:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libbpp-qt (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.3.2-1build1 => 2.4.0-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[20:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-5 [source] (bionic-proposed) [5.5.0-12ubuntu1]
[20:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libbpp-qt [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-1]
[20:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: bppsuite (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.3.2-1build1 => 2.4.0-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[20:23] <doko> jbicha: did you become a debian-med member? ;p
[20:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted bppsuite [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-1]
[20:24] <jbicha> no, just slightly cleaning up after them
[20:25] <jbicha> depending on how big of a hurry you're in, you could remove bppphyview and physamp until debian-med cares enough about them to make them buildable again
[20:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-qt [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-1] (no packageset)
[20:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-qt [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-1] (no packageset)
[20:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-qt [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-1] (no packageset)
[20:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-qt [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-1] (no packageset)
[20:27] <jbicha> maybe ignore physamp 1.0.3-1's autopkgtests too
[20:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-qt [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-1] (no packageset)
[20:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-qt [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-1] (no packageset)
[20:28] <slangasek> better in general to remove a package than to knowingly regress autopkgtests
[20:31] <slangasek> doko: I didn't see an answer to my question about removals of non-buggy packages from -proposed that are blocked by missing deps.  What policy do you think we should be applying here?
[20:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-7-cross-ports (bionic-proposed/universe) [16ubuntu2 => 16ubuntu3] (no packageset)
[20:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: slic3r-prusa (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.39.0+dfsg-1 => 1.39.1+dfsg-3] (no packageset) (sync)
[20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-7-cross (bionic-proposed/main) [20ubuntu2 => 20ubuntu3] (ubuntu-desktop)
[20:36] <doko> hmm, keeping them there makes people look at them again and again. otoh removing will need manual actual by looking into debian
[20:36] <doko> still curious why gcc-7-cross is a desktop package
[20:36] <tsimonq2> doko: bug 1683749, perhaps.
[20:36] <ubot5`> bug 1683749 in britney "Please list bugs tagged as "update-excuse" on update_excuses" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1683749
[20:36] <doko> well, starts with g* ;p
[20:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted slic3r-prusa [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.39.1+dfsg-3]
[20:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-7-cross-ports [source] (bionic-proposed) [16ubuntu3]
[20:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-qt [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-1]
[20:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-qt [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-1]
[20:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-qt [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-1]
[20:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-qt [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-1]
[20:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-qt [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-1]
[20:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-qt [i386] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-1]
[20:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-meta-oem [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0.1002.3]
[20:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1002.3]
[20:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-oem [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1002.3]
[20:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-7-cross [source] (bionic-proposed) [20ubuntu3]
[20:40] <slangasek> doko: yes, that is the tradeoff.  If we're going to kick them out of -proposed, perhaps we should keep a list somewhere else and revisit (or automatically process) a few times during the cycle?
[20:41] <slangasek> doko: but certainly if we are going to remove packages from -proposed that are not-buggy-but-blocked, nearly everything else > 90 days should also be removed
[20:41] <jbicha> yes please keep a list
[20:41] <doko> the list sounds fine
[20:42] <slangasek> doko: where would you like to put this list?
[20:42] <jbicha> there won't necessarily be a new Debian upload since it's a dependency that's broken in some of these cases not the package itself
[20:42] <slangasek> jbicha: precisely
[20:42] <doko> if you remove them, can you revive these packages by some copy magic?
[20:42] <slangasek> doko: yes, absolutely
[20:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: bind-dyndb-ldap (bionic-proposed/universe) [11.1-1 => 11.1-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[20:43] <doko> slangasek: keep it in a place where I can write =)
[20:43] <slangasek> doko: the wiki?  the sync-blacklist branch?
[20:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted bind-dyndb-ldap [sync] (bionic-proposed) [11.1-2]
[20:44] <doko> sync-blocklist would make sense
[20:44] <slangasek> doko: also I don't know a good way to query the list of packages that you have recently removed; I know grafana-zabbix only because it was such an outlier, but I think it probably wasn't the only one
[20:46] <doko> I'll look in my shell history. will prepare a list tomrrow and send it to you
[20:46] <slangasek> doko: thanks
[20:48] <slangasek> doko: https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-archive/+junk/sync-blacklist/view/head:/extra-removals.txt
[20:49] <tsimonq2> I really wish we could see who accepts/rejects a package and why, while we're at it. Would LP be the right thing to file against, or does a separate piece of tooling handle queue management?
[20:49] <LocutusOfBorg> g'night folks!
[20:49]  * tsimonq2 waves to LocutusOfBorg 
[20:49] <slangasek> tsimonq2: yes, LP
[20:50] <slangasek> tsimonq2: removals are documented in the history however
[20:50] <tsimonq2> slangasek: Correct, in the publishing history.
[20:51] <slangasek> ah yes you said accepts/rejects not accepts/removals, ignore me
[20:51] <tsimonq2> slangasek: So I can be specific in the bug report, Soyuz?
[20:51] <slangasek> tsimonq2: yes
[20:51] <tsimonq2> slangasek: okl
[20:51] <slangasek> (not sure if that matters)
[20:51] <tsimonq2> *ok
[20:51] <tsimonq2> ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
[20:53] <doko> ginggs: now nodejs migrated, and I see js tests failing ... https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-bionic/bionic/armhf/s/sphinx/20180411_204814_f63f9@/log.gz
[20:53] <tsimonq2> slangasek: bug 1763174, how's it look?
[20:53] <ubot5`> bug 1763174 in Launchpad itself "Soyuz should document acceptions/rejections from the queue" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1763174
[20:53] <doko> ;p
[20:54] <slangasek> tsimonq2: no opinion ;)
[20:55] <tsimonq2> slangasek: No opinion on the clarity of the bug report and how accurately it describes the current situation at hand, as well as what's desired? ;)
[20:55] <slangasek> yep!
[20:55] <tsimonq2> Alright. :)
[20:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gtkhash [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.1-2]
[20:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libnfs [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.0.0-1~exp1]
[20:56] <tsimonq2> slangasek: Assigned it to myself; it'll probably be handled post-18.04 but ideally before the floodgates open, much like bug 1654761.
[20:56] <ubot5`> bug 1654761 in Auto Package Testing "Make sure duplicate tests cannot be queued" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1654761
[20:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libnfs [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.0.0-1~exp1] (kubuntu)
[20:58]  * tsimonq2 wonders how quick the Calculating Camel will be announced...
[20:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libnfs [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.0.0-1~exp1] (kubuntu)
[20:59] <tsimonq2> slangasek: Would you happen to know where I can find the autoaccepter script?
[21:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libnfs [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.0.0-1~exp1] (kubuntu)
[21:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libnfs [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.0.0-1~exp1] (kubuntu)
[21:00] <tsimonq2> lp:ubuntu-archive-publishing?
[21:01] <ginggs> tsimonq2: see sphinx autopkgtest failures http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/sphinx/bionic/armhf - related to your nodejs?
[21:01] <slangasek> tsimonq2: I don't know; afaik stgraber operates it
[21:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libnfs [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.0.0-1~exp1] (kubuntu)
[21:02] <tsimonq2> ginggs: I'm not sure; are we talking about the nodejs you synced in my name? ;P
[21:03] <tsimonq2> slangasek: ack, he's on vac?
[21:03] <cyphermox> yes
[21:03] <tsimonq2> Ok, I'll ping next week.
[21:03] <slangasek> tsimonq2: so he said
[21:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libnfs [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [2.0.0-1~exp1]
[21:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libnfs [i386] (bionic-proposed) [2.0.0-1~exp1]
[21:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libnfs [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [2.0.0-1~exp1]
[21:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libnfs [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [2.0.0-1~exp1]
[21:04] <tsimonq2> nodejs> To be serious here, I'm not entirely sure what the problem is with those tests.
[21:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libnfs [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [2.0.0-1~exp1]
[21:04] <ginggs> doko: FAILURES / test_build_sphinx / ModuleNotFoundError: No module named \'distutils.core\'
[21:05] <tsimonq2> Right, why would that be nodejs?
[21:07] <doko> oops
[21:07] <doko> but just armhf?
[21:09] <ginggs> doko: the others haven't run yet - (well ppc64el and s390x did, but they always fail)
[21:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sphinx (bionic-proposed/main) [1.6.7-1 => 1.6.7-1ubuntu1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-server)
[21:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sphinx [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.6.7-1ubuntu1]
[21:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted strace [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.21-1ubuntu1]
[21:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-oslo.privsep [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.27.0-0ubuntu3]
[21:34] <Bashing-om> TJ-: Watching in #ubuntu-release. heavy discussion on the release testing schedules .
[21:35] <tsimonq2> Bashing-om: "heavy discussion"? :)
[21:36] <Bashing-om> opps wrong window ^ // Yeah .. been a bit following what yall are discussing .
[21:36] <tsimonq2> Maybe on the mailing list, but unless I missed something, not here?
[21:37] <Bashing-om> tsimonq2: mailing list for the most part . some reference here .. else I would not have much of a clue :)
[21:38] <tsimonq2> Bashing-om: I assume I can continue this conversation with you in #ubuntu-discuss? ;)
[21:38] <Bashing-om> tsimonq2: Yes my mentor . I await .
[21:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnocchi (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.2.0-0ubuntu2 => 4.2.0-0ubuntu3] (no packageset)
[21:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnocchi [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.2.0-0ubuntu3]
[21:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gpaw (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.3.0-2 => 1.3.0-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[21:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gpaw [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.3.0-2ubuntu1]
[22:03] <ginggs> doko: will you send that gpaw fix to debian please?
[22:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-testtools (bionic-proposed/main) [2.3.0-3ubuntu1 => 2.3.0-3ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[22:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-future (bionic-proposed/main) [0.15.2-4ubuntu1 => 0.15.2-4ubuntu2] (ubuntu-server)
[22:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-future [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.15.2-4ubuntu2]
[22:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-testtools [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.3.0-3ubuntu2]
[22:11] <doko> ginggs: yes
[22:12] <ginggs> doko: :) I was waiting for the problem to appear in ubuntu
[22:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libunity (bionic-proposed/main) [7.1.4+18.04.20180209.1-0ubuntu1 => 7.1.4+18.04.20180209.1-0ubuntu2] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[22:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libunity [source] (bionic-proposed) [7.1.4+18.04.20180209.1-0ubuntu2]
[22:34] <ginggs> doko: you get a panda! arm64 you get a panda! s390x you get a panda!  \o/ everyone gets pandas! except you, armhf, you and your silly bus error
[22:34] <slangasek> armhf, TI already gave you pandas
[22:36] <valorie>  aren't we handing out beavers this round?
[22:36] <tsimonq2> I want camels :P
[22:36] <valorie> lol
[22:36] <xnox> shit, cancel order of 100s of pandas
[22:36] <tsimonq2> hahahahahahaa
[22:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-7 (bionic-proposed/main) [7.3.0-16ubuntu1 => 7.3.0-16ubuntu2] (core)
[22:48] <mwhudson> i have a broken pandaboard if anyone is feeling left out
[22:48] <mwhudson> i think technically it belongs to linaro
[22:49] <xnox> I went to zoo in Hong Kong and saw a very sad panda
[22:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-7 [source] (bionic-proposed) [7.3.0-16ubuntu2]
[22:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oem [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.15.0-1002.3] (kernel)
[23:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1002.3]
[23:08] <ginggs> I went to a zoo that only had a dog
[23:09] <tsimonq2> hahahaha
[23:09] <ginggs> it was a shih tzu
[23:09] <tsimonq2> xnox: Sad pandas are bad. You cheered it up, I hope?
[23:13] <doko> they have limits on noise levels over there
[23:15] <tsimonq2> Ah.