sarnold | doko: re gcc-8 build failures, https://github.com/mobile-shell/mosh/issues/971 | 02:39 |
---|---|---|
tjaalton | ahasenack: 9.11.3 fixes the crash, I'll upload the merge | 05:55 |
boichev | anyone having experience with checkinstall ? I am trying to add a php.ini file inside a build from source but at the end it never gets included .... i use --include=/usr/local/php/php.ini or a text file containing this path ...... no success | 10:34 |
ahasenack | tjaalton: oh, cool find | 12:11 |
=== dpb1_ is now known as dpb1 | ||
nacc | LocutusOfBorg: ping | 15:54 |
nacc | LocutusOfBorg: s3cmd does not run, and you appear to TIL (LP: #1763398) | 15:55 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 1763398 in s3cmd (Ubuntu) "s3cmd package requires python distutils package" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1763398 | 15:55 |
nacc | LocutusOfBorg: it appears to have a build- and run-time dependency on python3-distutils that is either not expressed explicitly or is not being parsed | 15:56 |
nacc | LocutusOfBorg: it's also broken in Debian | 15:56 |
=== Elimin8r is now known as Elimin8er | ||
ginggs | doko: more distutils fun ^ | 16:41 |
nacc | ginggs: ref to the relevant change? was this a python3 change? | 16:42 |
ginggs | nacc: I think it was here: https://packages.qa.debian.org/p/python3.6/news/20180320T071954Z.html | 16:46 |
nacc | ginggs: ah thanks | 16:46 |
nacc | ginggs: and yeah, definitely direct fallout | 16:50 |
LocutusOfBorg | nacc, what I can do? | 17:06 |
nacc | LocutusOfBorg: i guess take my patch in debian so we can sync it later :) | 17:07 |
nacc | https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=895560 | 17:07 |
ubottu | Debian bug 895560 in s3cmd "s3cmd has a runtime dependency on python3-distutils" [Important,Open] | 17:07 |
LocutusOfBorg | ok but why! | 17:07 |
nacc | LocutusOfBorg: if you had been around, i was going to ask you to help me understand the problem :) | 17:07 |
nacc | LocutusOfBorg: python3-distutils is no longer pulled in by python3 | 17:07 |
nacc | LocutusOfBorg: https://packages.qa.debian.org/p/python3.6/news/20180320T071954Z.html | 17:07 |
nacc | LocutusOfBorg: you were the uploader to debian, which is why i pinged :) | 17:08 |
LocutusOfBorg | hurray more python fine | 17:08 |
nacc | maintainer, rather | 17:08 |
LocutusOfBorg | sure, I'll upload now | 17:08 |
nacc | LocutusOfBorg: thanks! | 17:08 |
nacc | LocutusOfBorg: i've already uploaded to bionic | 17:08 |
ginggs | nacc: LocutusOfBorg: apparently adding a runtime dependency on distutils is *not* the desired solution | 17:34 |
nacc | ginggs: what is? | 17:37 |
ginggs | nacc: :) this is why I pinged doko, hoping he would explain | 17:39 |
ginggs | nacc: here is an example https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gpaw/1.3.0-2ubuntu1 | 17:39 |
nacc | ginggs: i mean, yeah, sure, if i knew how to fix an upstream, i would have done that :-P | 17:42 |
bdmurray | tsimonq2: how many bugs are you setting to Incomplete? Are you doing it strategically at all? | 17:57 |
tsimonq2 | bdmurray: Sorry, what are you referring to? | 18:06 |
bdmurray | tsimonq2: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1152399/comments/3 | 18:06 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 1152399 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "ubiquity upgrade option failed due to being unable to resolve the upgrade" [Undecided,Confirmed] | 18:06 |
tsimonq2 | bdmurray: Ah. I inspected a decent chunk of bugs and put them in a script to set the statuses and leave the comments so I wouldn't have to click over and over and over again. I am finding out that while the majority of the bugs I set were fine, there were a few false ones, which have now been corrected, I believe. | 18:11 |
tsimonq2 | Sorry. | 18:11 |
bdmurray | tsimonq2: So you are done then? | 18:12 |
tsimonq2 | bdmurray: I was done a week or so ago, yes. | 18:13 |
Wimpress | bdmurray: Any chance this could be merged please? | 18:44 |
Wimpress | https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mate-dev/ubuntu-release-upgrader/ubuntu-mate-bionic-update/+merge/342372 | 18:44 |
=== tacocat` is now known as tacocat | ||
bdmurray | Wimpress: Does anything need to change for DistUpgrade.cfg.xenial for upgrades from 16.04? (I don't think so but would like a 2nd opinion.) | 18:52 |
Wimpress | bdmurray: No, these changes are good for upgrades from 16.04 or 17.10. | 18:52 |
bdmurray | Wimpress: To be clear the DistUpgrade.cfg file is read when the upgrade is being calculated and the section you are modifying is relevant for packages currently installed on the system so ubuntu-mate-cloudtop should still be in DistUpgrade.cfg.xenial because it is a valid meta package on 16.04. | 18:55 |
Wimpress | bdmurray: OK, I'll add DistUpgrade.cfg.xenial so that ubuntu-mate-cloudtop is accounted for. | 18:56 |
Wimpress | Thanks. | 18:56 |
bdmurray | Wimpress: My point is I don't think you want to add it because it is a valid metapackage for that release. | 18:56 |
bdmurray | s/add/remove it/ | 18:56 |
=== Guest88648 is now known as karstensrage | ||
nacc | doko: fyi, netbeans is basically fundamentally broken and ftbfs now: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=894715 | 20:00 |
ubottu | Debian bug 894715 in netbeans "netbeans doesn't start (and exits with error code 2)" [Important,Open] | 20:00 |
nacc | i'm going to check if it ftbfs in debian too, and if not, why not | 20:01 |
jbicha | doko: I reported Debian bug 895574 I assume you understand the issue better than I do | 21:57 |
ubottu | Debian bug 895574 in src:lintian "lintian: binary-compiled-with-profiling-enabled test fails on Ubuntu's armhf" [Normal,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/895574 | 21:57 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!