[02:39] <sarnold> doko: re gcc-8 build failures, https://github.com/mobile-shell/mosh/issues/971
[05:55] <tjaalton> ahasenack: 9.11.3 fixes the crash, I'll upload the merge
[10:34] <boichev> anyone having experience with checkinstall ? I am trying to add a php.ini file inside a build from source but at the end it never gets included .... i use --include=/usr/local/php/php.ini or a text file containing this path ...... no success
[12:11] <ahasenack> tjaalton: oh, cool find
[15:54] <nacc> LocutusOfBorg: ping
[15:55] <nacc> LocutusOfBorg: s3cmd does not run, and you appear to TIL (LP: #1763398)
[15:56] <nacc> LocutusOfBorg: it appears to have a build- and run-time dependency on python3-distutils that is either not expressed explicitly or is not being parsed
[15:56] <nacc> LocutusOfBorg: it's also broken in Debian
[16:41] <ginggs> doko: more distutils fun ^
[16:42] <nacc> ginggs: ref to the relevant change? was this a python3 change?
[16:46] <ginggs> nacc: I think it was here: https://packages.qa.debian.org/p/python3.6/news/20180320T071954Z.html
[16:46] <nacc> ginggs: ah thanks
[16:50] <nacc> ginggs: and yeah, definitely direct fallout
[17:06] <LocutusOfBorg> nacc, what I can do?
[17:07] <nacc> LocutusOfBorg: i guess take my patch in debian so we can sync it later :)
[17:07] <nacc> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=895560
[17:07] <LocutusOfBorg> ok but why!
[17:07] <nacc> LocutusOfBorg: if you had been around, i was going to ask you to help me understand the problem :)
[17:07] <nacc> LocutusOfBorg: python3-distutils is no longer pulled in by python3
[17:07] <nacc> LocutusOfBorg: https://packages.qa.debian.org/p/python3.6/news/20180320T071954Z.html
[17:08] <nacc> LocutusOfBorg: you were the uploader to debian, which is why i pinged :)
[17:08] <LocutusOfBorg> hurray more python fine
[17:08] <nacc> maintainer, rather
[17:08] <LocutusOfBorg> sure, I'll upload now
[17:08] <nacc> LocutusOfBorg: thanks!
[17:08] <nacc> LocutusOfBorg: i've already uploaded to bionic
[17:34] <ginggs> nacc: LocutusOfBorg: apparently adding a runtime dependency on distutils is *not* the desired solution
[17:37] <nacc> ginggs: what is?
[17:39] <ginggs> nacc: :) this is why I pinged doko, hoping he would explain
[17:39] <ginggs> nacc: here is an example https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gpaw/1.3.0-2ubuntu1
[17:42] <nacc> ginggs: i mean, yeah, sure, if i knew how to fix an upstream, i would have done that :-P
[17:57] <bdmurray> tsimonq2: how many bugs are you setting to Incomplete? Are you doing it strategically at all?
[18:06] <tsimonq2> bdmurray: Sorry, what are you referring to?
[18:06] <bdmurray> tsimonq2: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1152399/comments/3
[18:11] <tsimonq2> bdmurray: Ah. I inspected a decent chunk of bugs and put them in a script to set the statuses and leave the comments so I wouldn't have to click over and over and over again. I am finding out that while the majority of the bugs I set were fine, there were a few false ones, which have now been corrected, I believe.
[18:11] <tsimonq2> Sorry.
[18:12] <bdmurray> tsimonq2: So you are done then?
[18:13] <tsimonq2> bdmurray: I was done a week or so ago, yes.
[18:44] <Wimpress> bdmurray: Any chance this could be merged please?
[18:44] <Wimpress> https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mate-dev/ubuntu-release-upgrader/ubuntu-mate-bionic-update/+merge/342372
[18:52] <bdmurray> Wimpress: Does anything need to change for DistUpgrade.cfg.xenial for upgrades from 16.04? (I don't think so but would like a 2nd opinion.)
[18:52] <Wimpress> bdmurray: No, these changes are good for upgrades from 16.04 or 17.10.
[18:55] <bdmurray> Wimpress: To be clear the DistUpgrade.cfg file is read when the upgrade is being calculated and the section you are modifying is relevant for packages currently installed on the system so ubuntu-mate-cloudtop should still be in DistUpgrade.cfg.xenial because it is a valid meta package on 16.04.
[18:56] <Wimpress> bdmurray: OK, I'll add DistUpgrade.cfg.xenial so that ubuntu-mate-cloudtop is accounted for.
[18:56] <Wimpress> Thanks.
[18:56] <bdmurray> Wimpress: My point is I don't think you want to add it because it is a valid metapackage for that release.
[18:56] <bdmurray> s/add/remove it/
[20:00] <nacc> doko: fyi, netbeans is basically fundamentally broken and ftbfs now: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=894715
[20:01] <nacc> i'm going to check if it ftbfs in debian too, and if not, why not
[21:57] <jbicha> doko: I reported Debian bug 895574 I assume you understand the issue better than I do