[02:39] doko: re gcc-8 build failures, https://github.com/mobile-shell/mosh/issues/971 [05:55] ahasenack: 9.11.3 fixes the crash, I'll upload the merge [10:34] anyone having experience with checkinstall ? I am trying to add a php.ini file inside a build from source but at the end it never gets included .... i use --include=/usr/local/php/php.ini or a text file containing this path ...... no success [12:11] tjaalton: oh, cool find === dpb1_ is now known as dpb1 [15:54] LocutusOfBorg: ping [15:55] LocutusOfBorg: s3cmd does not run, and you appear to TIL (LP: #1763398) [15:55] Launchpad bug 1763398 in s3cmd (Ubuntu) "s3cmd package requires python distutils package" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1763398 [15:56] LocutusOfBorg: it appears to have a build- and run-time dependency on python3-distutils that is either not expressed explicitly or is not being parsed [15:56] LocutusOfBorg: it's also broken in Debian === Elimin8r is now known as Elimin8er [16:41] doko: more distutils fun ^ [16:42] ginggs: ref to the relevant change? was this a python3 change? [16:46] nacc: I think it was here: https://packages.qa.debian.org/p/python3.6/news/20180320T071954Z.html [16:46] ginggs: ah thanks [16:50] ginggs: and yeah, definitely direct fallout [17:06] nacc, what I can do? [17:07] LocutusOfBorg: i guess take my patch in debian so we can sync it later :) [17:07] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=895560 [17:07] Debian bug 895560 in s3cmd "s3cmd has a runtime dependency on python3-distutils" [Important,Open] [17:07] ok but why! [17:07] LocutusOfBorg: if you had been around, i was going to ask you to help me understand the problem :) [17:07] LocutusOfBorg: python3-distutils is no longer pulled in by python3 [17:07] LocutusOfBorg: https://packages.qa.debian.org/p/python3.6/news/20180320T071954Z.html [17:08] LocutusOfBorg: you were the uploader to debian, which is why i pinged :) [17:08] hurray more python fine [17:08] maintainer, rather [17:08] sure, I'll upload now [17:08] LocutusOfBorg: thanks! [17:08] LocutusOfBorg: i've already uploaded to bionic [17:34] nacc: LocutusOfBorg: apparently adding a runtime dependency on distutils is *not* the desired solution [17:37] ginggs: what is? [17:39] nacc: :) this is why I pinged doko, hoping he would explain [17:39] nacc: here is an example https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gpaw/1.3.0-2ubuntu1 [17:42] ginggs: i mean, yeah, sure, if i knew how to fix an upstream, i would have done that :-P [17:57] tsimonq2: how many bugs are you setting to Incomplete? Are you doing it strategically at all? [18:06] bdmurray: Sorry, what are you referring to? [18:06] tsimonq2: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1152399/comments/3 [18:06] Launchpad bug 1152399 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "ubiquity upgrade option failed due to being unable to resolve the upgrade" [Undecided,Confirmed] [18:11] bdmurray: Ah. I inspected a decent chunk of bugs and put them in a script to set the statuses and leave the comments so I wouldn't have to click over and over and over again. I am finding out that while the majority of the bugs I set were fine, there were a few false ones, which have now been corrected, I believe. [18:11] Sorry. [18:12] tsimonq2: So you are done then? [18:13] bdmurray: I was done a week or so ago, yes. [18:44] bdmurray: Any chance this could be merged please? [18:44] https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mate-dev/ubuntu-release-upgrader/ubuntu-mate-bionic-update/+merge/342372 === tacocat` is now known as tacocat [18:52] Wimpress: Does anything need to change for DistUpgrade.cfg.xenial for upgrades from 16.04? (I don't think so but would like a 2nd opinion.) [18:52] bdmurray: No, these changes are good for upgrades from 16.04 or 17.10. [18:55] Wimpress: To be clear the DistUpgrade.cfg file is read when the upgrade is being calculated and the section you are modifying is relevant for packages currently installed on the system so ubuntu-mate-cloudtop should still be in DistUpgrade.cfg.xenial because it is a valid meta package on 16.04. [18:56] bdmurray: OK, I'll add DistUpgrade.cfg.xenial so that ubuntu-mate-cloudtop is accounted for. [18:56] Thanks. [18:56] Wimpress: My point is I don't think you want to add it because it is a valid metapackage for that release. [18:56] s/add/remove it/ === Guest88648 is now known as karstensrage [20:00] doko: fyi, netbeans is basically fundamentally broken and ftbfs now: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=894715 [20:00] Debian bug 894715 in netbeans "netbeans doesn't start (and exits with error code 2)" [Important,Open] [20:01] i'm going to check if it ftbfs in debian too, and if not, why not [21:57] doko: I reported Debian bug 895574 I assume you understand the issue better than I do [21:57] Debian bug 895574 in src:lintian "lintian: binary-compiled-with-profiling-enabled test fails on Ubuntu's armhf" [Normal,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/895574