[04:40] <LoRider> Tried the 18.04 beta a few days ago but had a problem with the nouveau driver crashing the system. Tried finding additional video drivers but none were showing up so I downgraded to 17.10 and searched for drivers for my Nvidea 6159 SE card and found what I was looking for.  Q: Will Nvidea Legacy drivers  be available in the final 18.04 release like
[04:40] <LoRider>  they are in the 16.04 and 17.10? Any insight greatly appreciated...
[05:33] <alikhanzoorrr> awdwadaw
[05:33] <alikhanzoorrr> heloooooo
[05:34] <alikhanzoorrr> fuck gg
[06:35] <alikhanzoorrr> hello
[06:35] <alikhanzoorrr> guis
[06:35] <alikhanzoorrr> guys
[06:35] <alikhanzoorrr> hheeeey
[06:35] <alikhanzoorrr> someone
[06:35] <alikhanzoorrr> hear me/
[06:35] <alikhanzoorrr> ?
[06:35] <diogenes_> stop
[06:36] <alikhanzoorrr> helooooo
[06:36] <alikhanzoorrr> diogenes
[06:36] <diogenes_> hi
[06:36] <alikhanzoorrr> how a y
[06:40] <alkisg> alikhanzoorrr: this IRC channel is for ubuntu-mate users that need support
[06:40] <alkisg> If you want generic chat, search for other channels
[07:03] <mate|47545> hi
[07:03] <mate|47545> hi
[07:03] <mate|47545> hi
[07:04] <mate|47545> hi
[07:04] <mate|47545> hi
[10:50] <chrstphrchvz> Where should I be reporting issues for specific software boutique listings? I had posted an issue at https://github.com/ubuntu-mate/software-boutique/issues/7 but I'm not sure it's in the right place.
[10:51] <vkareh> chrstphrchvz: that seems like the right place
[10:52] <chrstphrchvz> I know that a few months ago things were split into different repos for welcome center, software boutique, etc.
[10:55] <vkareh> chrstphrchvz: ah, you might be right. There's also https://github.com/ubuntu-mate/ubuntu-mate.software which has the actual app listing. But checking on github, @Wimpress is subscribed to both - so he'll get notifications regardless :)
[11:01] <lapaga> speaking of software boutique...so many things I try to install via that come up not found. Something simple like htop.  I can install everything via apt or synaptic so am wondering if I do not have it set up correctly
[11:17] <alkisg> chrstphrchvz: it sounds strange though, that a package manager would be the one that removes dependencies. Those are usually managed by apt.
[11:18] <alkisg> Is shotwell-common marked as automatically or as manually installed in your setup?
[11:19] <alkisg> Here I have boutique uninstalled. And  apt show shotwell-common says: APT-Manual-Installed: yes
[11:19] <alkisg> That tells me that it's probably the live cd creation process, the "seeds", that mark it as manually installed, so it doesn't get removed if shotwell gets removed
[11:20] <alkisg> In other words, if I run `apt purge --auto-remove shotwell`, it WON'T remove shotwell-common. And this is completely unrelated to the boutique.
[11:28] <alikhanzoor> hello guys
[11:28] <alkisg> Hello
[11:29] <alikhanzoor> how are u
[11:29] <alikhanzoor> mate
[11:29] <alikhanzoor> blyat
[11:29] <alikhanzoor> мать ебал
[11:29] <alikhanzoor> долбоеб
[11:29] <alikhanzoor> тупой
[11:29] <alkisg> alikhanzoor: this channel is for ubuntu-mate support only
[11:30] <alkisg> For general chat, search for other channels
[11:30] <alikhanzoor> ты че
[11:30] <alikhanzoor> охуел пидорас
[11:30] <alkisg> !ru
[11:30] <alikhanzoor> долбоеб
[11:30] <alikhanzoor> тупой
[11:30] <alikhanzoor> сука
[11:31] <alikhanzoor> hello
[11:31] <alikhanzoor> motherfucker
[12:17] <chrstphrchvz> alkisg: I've since manually removed shotwell and shotwell-common, so I'm not sure if shotwell-common was set to manually installed in the first place.
[12:17] <chrstphrchvz> But even if shotwell-common were set to automatically installed, I think it would be ideal if shotwell-common (if present) would still be removed by software boutique, rather than relying on apt autoremove happening at some later time.
[12:18] <chrstphrchvz> I haven't found which repo hosts the listing for shotwell, it seems to have disappeared after things were split up…
[12:21] <alkisg> chrstphrchvz: if shotwell-common is set to MANUALLY installed in all ubuntu-mate installations, of course there's no reason for any package manager to remove it
[12:21] <alkisg> Package managers of course won't keep their own list of which packages to remove when other packages are removed; they'll rely on apt to do that housekeeping
[12:22] <alkisg> I.e. you filed your bug report in the wrong place, it should be filed against ubuntu seeds and not a boutique or any other software center
[12:22] <alkisg> *in
[12:24] <alkisg> In other words. Install shotwell now from boutique. It will automatically install showwell-common as well. Then remove it again. IF shotwell-common now is not removed, THEN it's a boutique bug; ELSE it was an ubuntu seeds bug.
[12:28] <chrstphrchvz> alkisg, I haven't checked in 18.04, but in 17.10 (or at least when I wrote the issue a few months ago) boutique used a PPA for shotwell which builds it as a single package (i.e. without a shotwell-common package; its .deb actually specifies that it "replaces" shotwell-common).
[12:29] <alkisg> Meh, using PPAs is against Ubuntu policy
[12:29] <alkisg> (for flavors, not for users)
[12:29] <alkisg> You can file a bug report against that
[13:10] <koa> Hey everyone, how is your day going? :p
[13:13] <koa> Good to know that this chat is very active lmao.
[13:47] <mate|46854> hi
[15:38] <jonas_> Hey everyone, haven't used this before lol
[16:18] <spanky73> leave
[16:18] <spanky73> leave
[17:10] <spanky73> msg/ NickServ identify e$@dmf@
[17:11] <spanky73> whois spanky73