=== himcesjf_ is now known as him-cesjf | ||
purple1 | can 64bit binars run on 32bit with some emulator | 08:28 |
---|---|---|
smeso | yes, you can use qemu | 08:30 |
aaa_ | Cannot join #mysql (You are banned). | 08:32 |
aaa_ | :'( | 08:32 |
apw | phil42, what TJ- said, you traid one kind of backporting for another, backporting lots of needed h/w changes against backporting fixes in the life of the release | 08:33 |
apw | phil42, generally speaking ubuntu prides itself on having the latest of things in its releases | 08:33 |
phil42 | idunno, just seems a longterm kernel would be better for a longterm release | 08:34 |
apw | phil42, it we didn't have people supporting the kernel you would be right, but we do | 08:35 |
phil42 | still... | 08:35 |
apw | you can make your own kernel on 4.14 if that makes you happy | 08:36 |
phil42 | no, thanks anyway | 08:36 |
apw | all they are doing in upstream stable is collecting patches marked for stable | 08:36 |
apw | that isn't in and of itself a hugly hard task, yes there are some backports to be done | 08:36 |
TJ- | phil42: kernel.org LTS kernels are intended for embedded device manufacturers in the main, so they can easily add security/bug fixes without needing to do major changes, which should feed through to device owners being able to receive security updates | 08:37 |
apw | but it is a patch collection process | 08:37 |
TJ- | Devices where the hardware isn't changing | 08:37 |
apw | and yes, us taking 4.15 is more work for us no doubt about it | 08:37 |
TJ- | And where the manufacturer doesn't have kernel developers, just devs who can tweak and package it | 08:37 |
apw | but it meets our goals for hardware support | 08:37 |
phil42 | that's all i'm saying | 08:37 |
apw | we are already carrying huge backports for things even in 4.15 | 08:38 |
apw | and even then the oem people are getting ahead of us | 08:38 |
purple1 | smeso what is the package name? | 08:38 |
apw | but particularly after the meltdown nightmare we have thought hard about it | 08:39 |
phil42 | they say being a night owl is bad for your health | 08:39 |
purple1 | how finding the iso with 64bit 14.04 LTS, running the 3.13.0-57-generic kernel. | 08:40 |
purple1 | ubuntu has simple beginner webpage | 08:40 |
purple1 | not sort by kernel version | 08:40 |
TJ- | apw: meltdown vis-a-vis backporting to 4.4/4.13 ? | 08:41 |
apw | yeah, getting non-aligned kernels fixed was clearly more work than those in sync | 08:41 |
phil42 | 3.13.0-57 was near june 19, 2015 | 08:42 |
apw | though with some wood tapping and crossing of things we won't have anything of that magnitude for a few years | 08:42 |
purple1 | yeah phil42 | 08:43 |
purple1 | old hardware | 08:43 |
purple1 | what 64bit cpu I have | 08:43 |
purple1 | tested on that kernel | 08:43 |
purple1 | how finding | 08:44 |
TJ- | purple1: via old-releases, see for 14.04.0 (original release) http://old-releases.ubuntu.com/releases/14.04.0/ | 08:44 |
TJ- | purple1: go up to the parent directory to see *all* release versions | 08:45 |
TJ- | apw: are you aware of issues with nouveau ? We're seeing quite a few users in #ubuntu+1 reporting severe problems on some devices, segfault-ing, or "trapped write/read" spam in the thousands, causing failure to boot. | 08:49 |
purple1 | searched hard for the even older hp factory ubuntu with the mobile internet interface | 08:50 |
purple1 | the newer versions gloss over rare hardware | 08:51 |
purple1 | how can tell if it has the same kernel version | 08:54 |
purple1 | before download near 1gb | 08:54 |
phil42 | i doubt it does, the dates don't match | 08:56 |
phil42 | maybe try it, it might also work | 08:56 |
TJ- | purple1: read the matching .manifest file which lists all included packages and their versions | 08:56 |
TJ- | purple1: shows me "linux-image-3.13.0-24-generic 3.13.0-24.46" for in ubuntu-14.04-desktop-amd64.manifest | 08:58 |
purple1 | how finding which pack contains iso-hybrid | 09:55 |
TJ- | purple1: all ISOs are hybrid images. They are designed to boot in ISO-9960/El Torito, BIOS/MBR, BIOS/GPT, UEFI/MBR UEI/GPT modes | 09:56 |
purple1 | file says dos mbr | 09:57 |
TJ- | purple1: you should move to the #ubuntu channel; this channel is for kernel development issues | 09:58 |
apw | TJ-, i have not heard any complaints on nouveau no, i'll ask about | 10:13 |
apw | TJ-, any particular series ? | 10:13 |
apw | oh is #ubuntu+1 bionic focused | 10:14 |
TJ- | apw: it's generally the new beta testers | 10:18 |
TJ- | apw: might be something that'll appear more as folks start trying/installing 18.04 | 10:18 |
TJ- | apw: yes, #ubuntu+1 is for people testing the in-devel version | 10:19 |
TJ- | apw: in some cases it could be due to not having the (restricted) Nvidia firmware blobs | 10:19 |
purple1 | sounds like bs | 10:23 |
purple1 | you call that focused? | 10:23 |
apw | sforshee, ^ for awareness | 10:26 |
apw | who | 10:26 |
eyal | Hello! you probably get this asked frequenty, so apologies if this is documented (i have gone through the FAQ/triage texts). Anyway, I have filed a kernel bug report at the end of January, and have seen no indication of anything on it. | 13:29 |
eyal | The texts do indicate some automatic script is doing initial triaging... but haven't seen anything of the sort :) | 13:30 |
jsalisbury | eyal, what is the bug number? I'll take a look. | 13:31 |
eyal | jsalisbury: bug #1746474. thanks! | 13:32 |
ubot5` | bug 1746474 in linux-hwe (Ubuntu) "unregister_netdevice: waiting for eth0 to become free. Usage count = 5" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1746474 | 13:32 |
jsalisbury | eyal, ahh, wasn't on my radar because it was filed against linux-hwe instead of linux. I"ll build a test kernel with that commit and post it to the bug. | 13:34 |
eyal | jsalisbury: cool. thanks. fwiw i filed it using | 13:35 |
eyal | 'ubuntu-bug linux', so you could have more of those :) | 13:36 |
jsalisbury | eyal, ok, thanks | 13:36 |
tomreyn | -hwe has 200 "new" bug reports | 13:57 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!