| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: avahi (xenial-proposed/main) [0.6.32~rc+dfsg-1ubuntu2.1 => 0.6.32~rc+dfsg-1ubuntu3] (core) | 00:10 | |
| tsimonq2 | slangasek: Wat? O_o | 00:43 |
|---|---|---|
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gtk+3.0 (bionic-proposed/main) [3.22.29-3ubuntu1 => 3.22.30-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) | 00:58 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-software (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.1-0ubuntu2 => 3.28.1-0ubuntu3] (ubuntu-desktop) | 01:26 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: scim-anthy (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.2.7-6build2 => 1.2.7-7] (no packageset) (sync) | 01:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted scim-anthy [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.7-7] | 01:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: remote-logon-service (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0.1.1-2 => 1.0.2.0-1] (no packageset) (sync) | 01:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted remote-logon-service [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.2.0-1] | 01:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: animals (bionic-proposed/universe) [201207131226-2 => 201207131226-2.1] (no packageset) (sync) | 01:43 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted animals [sync] (bionic-proposed) [201207131226-2.1] | 01:43 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-control-center (bionic-proposed/main) [1:3.28.0-0ubuntu6 => 1:3.28.1-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) | 01:48 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-jsondiff (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.1-1 => 1.1.1-2] (no packageset) (sync) | 01:49 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-ruffus (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.6.3+dfsg-4 => 2.6.3+dfsg-5] (no packageset) (sync) | 01:50 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-jsondiff [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.1-2] | 01:50 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-ruffus [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.6.3+dfsg-5] | 01:50 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-csb (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.2.5+dfsg-1 => 1.2.5+dfsg-3] (no packageset) (sync) | 01:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-csb [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.5+dfsg-3] | 01:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-qcli (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.1.1-2 => 0.1.1-3] (no packageset) (sync) | 01:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-qcli [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.1.1-3] | 01:52 | |
| slangasek | tsimonq2: I don't know why it was showing up that way before but it's cleared up | 02:42 |
| tsimonq2 | slangasek: OK. | 02:46 |
| tsimonq2 | slangasek: Otherwise, I didn't break anything? :) | 02:47 |
| slangasek | tsimonq2: so far as I saw | 03:00 |
| tsimonq2 | slangasek: Cool. | 03:01 |
| tsimonq2 | 4232 tests in the amd64 bionic huge queue o__o | 04:32 |
| slangasek | yeah who's been uploading things | 04:37 |
| tsimonq2 | True. | 04:38 |
| tsimonq2 | ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ | 04:38 |
| valorie | good thing we can't check things like that | 04:39 |
| tsimonq2 | hah | 04:41 |
| tsimonq2 | Honestly though, perl is most of that... | 04:41 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapcraft (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.41+18.04 => 2.41+18.04.1] (no packageset) | 05:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapcraft [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.41+18.04.1] | 05:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted plymouth [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.9.3-1ubuntu7] | 06:39 | |
| Mirv | so familiar sight http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#qtbase-opensource-src :) | 06:39 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gtk+3.0 [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.22.29-3ubuntu2] | 06:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gtk+3.0 [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.22.30-1ubuntu1] | 06:40 | |
| infinity | Mirv: I may have decided to slightly exercise the queues a little bit. | 06:40 |
| infinity | And perl too. | 06:41 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected qtubuntu [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.64+17.10.20170707-0ubuntu7] | 06:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qtubuntu [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.64+17.10.20170707-0ubuntu7] | 06:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-software [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.1-0ubuntu3] | 06:44 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted palapeli [source] (bionic-proposed) [4:17.12.3-0ubuntu2] | 06:44 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kdevelop [source] (bionic-proposed) [4:5.2.1-1ubuntu4] | 06:44 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted isc-dhcp [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.3.5-3ubuntu7] | 06:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted autopkgtest [source] (bionic-proposed) [5.3ubuntu1] | 06:46 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-music [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.1-1] | 06:46 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted vala [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.40.4-1] | 06:46 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pencil2d [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.6.1-1] | 06:46 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-msgpack [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.5.6-1] | 06:47 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-pint [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.8.1-2] | 06:47 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-control-center [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:3.28.1-0ubuntu1] | 06:48 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kigo [source] (bionic-proposed) [4:17.12.3-0ubuntu2] | 06:48 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kgoldrunner [source] (bionic-proposed) [4:17.12.3-0ubuntu2] | 06:48 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted maas [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0~beta2-6865-gec43e47e6-0ubuntu1] | 06:50 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-bep-debounce [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.0-1] | 06:50 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-meta (bionic-proposed/main) [1.415 => 1.416] (core) | 07:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-msgpack (bionic-proposed/main) [0.5.6-0ubuntu1 => 0.5.6-1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) (sync) | 07:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: volume-key (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.3.9-3 => 0.3.9-4] (kubuntu) (sync) | 08:16 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-meta [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.416] | 08:19 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-report (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0.7 => 1.0.8] (no packageset) | 08:52 | |
| === bluesabre_ is now known as bluesabre | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ukui-menu (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.1-0ubuntu1 => 1.1.2-0ubuntu1] (ubuntukylin) | 09:26 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-lts-xenial [amd64] (trusty-proposed/main) [4.4.0-121.145~14.04.1] (kernel) | 09:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-lts-xenial [amd64] (trusty-proposed) [4.4.0-121.145~14.04.1] | 10:13 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xfpanel-switch (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0.6-0ubuntu1 => 1.0.7-0ubuntu1] (ubuntustudio, xubuntu) | 10:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: brltty (bionic-proposed/main) [5.5-4ubuntu1 => 5.5-4ubuntu2] (core) | 10:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fonts-arphic-uming (bionic-proposed/main) [0.2.20080216.2-7ubuntu2 => 0.2.20080216.2-7ubuntu3] (personal-gunnarhj, ubuntu-desktop) | 11:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libmbim (bionic-proposed/main) [1.14.2-2.1 => 1.14.2-2.1ubuntu1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) | 11:19 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-meta (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0.15.16 => 4.15.0.17.18] (core, kernel) (sync) | 12:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-15.16 => 4.15.0-17.18] (core, kernel) (sync) | 12:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-signed (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-15.16 => 4.15.0-17.18] (core, kernel) (sync) | 12:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: make-dfsg (bionic-proposed/main) [4.1-9.1 => 4.1-9.1ubuntu1] (core) | 12:38 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sddm (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.17.0-1ubuntu4 => 0.17.0-1ubuntu5] (kubuntu) | 12:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-oslo.versionedobjects (bionic-proposed/main) [1.31.2-0ubuntu2 => 1.31.2-0ubuntu3] (kubuntu, openstack, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) | 13:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-oslo.versionedobjects (artful-proposed/main) [1.26.0-0ubuntu1 => 1.26.0-0ubuntu2] (kubuntu, openstack, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) | 13:04 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mate-terminal (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.20.0-2ubuntu1 => 1.20.0-3ubuntu1] (ubuntu-mate, ubuntukylin) | 13:04 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-report [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.8] | 13:13 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: neutron (bionic-proposed/main) [2:12.0.0-0ubuntu2 => 2:12.0.0-0ubuntu3] (openstack, ubuntu-server) | 13:58 | |
| === M_hc is now known as _hc | ||
| blackboxsw | RAOF: Wondering if there is time for a cloud-init 18.2-4-g05926e48-0ubuntu1~16.04.1 SRU release into artful and xenial. It's all queued and validated per bug #1759406 | 14:15 |
| ubot5` | bug 1759406 in cloud-init (Ubuntu) "sru cloud-init (17.2-35-gf576b2a2-0ubuntu1~16.04.1 update to 18.2-4-g05926e48-0ubuntu1)" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1759406 | 14:15 |
| sergiusens | RAOF: hey, mind looking into accepting snapcraft into xenial- and artful-proposed? | 14:28 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-calendar (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.1-1ubuntu1 => 3.28.1-1ubuntu2] (desktop-extra, ubuntu-desktop) | 14:29 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: installation-locale (bionic-proposed/main) [1.7 => 1.7build1] (core) | 15:02 | |
| cjwatson | sil2100: ^- | 15:04 |
| sil2100 | On it! | 15:06 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted installation-locale [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.7build1] | 15:07 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected python-msgpack [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.5.6-1] | 15:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted volume-key [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.3.9-4] | 15:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ukui-menu [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.2-0ubuntu1] | 15:24 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xfpanel-switch [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.7-0ubuntu1] | 15:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted brltty [source] (bionic-proposed) [5.5-4ubuntu2] | 15:29 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fonts-arphic-uming [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.2.20080216.2-7ubuntu3] | 15:29 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libmbim [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.14.2-2.1ubuntu1] | 15:34 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-meta [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0.17.18] | 15:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-17.18] | 15:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-signed [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-17.18] | 15:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted make-dfsg [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.1-9.1ubuntu1] | 15:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sddm [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.17.0-1ubuntu5] | 15:37 | |
| sil2100 | coreycb: hey! Looking at the python-oslo.versionedobjects upload for bionic now and was just wondering - you mention 'this reverts and changes the fix...' - I still see the old patch applied, not reverted, and wanted to know if that's intended | 15:39 |
| coreycb | sil2100: hmm it should be reverted | 15:40 |
| sil2100 | coreycb: since I'd expect the previous fix to be reverted when reading this changelog entry, but yeah, maybe that's not what you had in mind | 15:40 |
| sil2100 | http://launchpadlibrarian.net/365992975/python-oslo.versionedobjects_1.31.2-0ubuntu2_1.31.2-0ubuntu3.diff.gz <- Fixing-uuid-coerce-function-for-unicode-non-uuid-form.patch is still in debian/patches/series | 15:40 |
| coreycb | sil2100: well partially reverted i suppose | 15:40 |
| sil2100 | Or does this mean 'revert a piece of that fix from that patch' | 15:41 |
| coreycb | sil2100: yes, that | 15:41 |
| sil2100 | Ok, then all good, this is what I wanted to know, thanks | 15:41 |
| coreycb | sil2100: ok thanks. | 15:41 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-oslo.versionedobjects [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.31.2-0ubuntu3] | 15:42 | |
| bdmurray | sil2100: Could you review my avahi upload in x-proposed? | 15:43 |
| sil2100 | bdmurray: sure thing, one moment | 15:48 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gjs (bionic-proposed/main) [1.52.1-1 => 1.52.1-1ubuntu1] (desktop-extra, mozilla, ubuntu-desktop) | 15:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-notifier (bionic-proposed/main) [3.190 => 3.191] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) | 16:03 | |
| foka | Hi! Is there a URL where I could read about how the "Unapproved: update-notifier" sync into Bionic work? | 16:06 |
| foka | I was both horrified and pleasantly surprised to see that hugo (0.38-1) got synced a few days ago, replacing the 0.37.1-1 version which required a manual requestsync after the FeatureFreeze/DebianImportFreeze. | 16:08 |
| jbicha | foka: what version of hugo do you want in bionic? | 16:09 |
| slangasek | foka: drilling down into the entries on https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hugo/+publishinghistory shows you who synced the package (jbicha); you would have to ask him what his rationale was for syncing. Because the package is not seeded in any Ubuntu flavor, it did not require manual review from the release team to be included, only a sync by an Ubuntu developer | 16:09 |
| foka | slangasek, Thank you for your detailed explanation! :-) | 16:10 |
| foka | jbicha, Thank you so much for syncing Hugo! A (tiny?) problem was that there was a regression in 0.38, leading to 0.38.1 and 0.38.2, but now 0.39 is out which is probably the best version right now. :-) | 16:11 |
| jbicha | ok, I was planning to sync 0.39 once launchpad picks it up from Debian | 16:12 |
| foka | jbicha: Mind if I get back to you soon? 0.39 just came out yesterday, and 0.39-1 was uploaded to Debian some 12 hours ago https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=hugo and not showing up on packages.debian.org yet... | 16:12 |
| foka | jbicha: Oh, cool! Many thanks for keeping Hugo up-to-date! I'm sure many Hugo users will be happy. :-) | 16:13 |
| jbicha | I selectively sync some universe packages late that are fairly standalone and where the new version seems helpful | 16:14 |
| foka | jbicha: I sent a (Gitter) message to @bep (main Hugo author) as to whether he has discovered any bug or regression that would require a v0.39.1 bugfix release. But yeah, v0.39 looks good so far. Thank you very much jbicha! | 16:15 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: software-properties (bionic-proposed/main) [0.96.24.31 => 0.96.24.32] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) | 16:15 | |
| jbicha | but I won't be doing any hugo Stable Release Updates so I'll let you take care of any of that if you want | 16:15 |
| teward | just a question, but I have a version numbering change for NGINX from 1.13.12 to 1.14.0 that has no other functional changes (the 1.14.0 branch was just released today and is essentially 1.13.12 that exists now). Does this need an FFe or can this just be accepted once I upload it? | 16:17 |
| foka | jbicha: True, Stable Release Updates (SRU), which, IIRC, happens after the final release (or the final freeze), and that follows a totally different process. | 16:19 |
| teward | (I was going to file an FFe bug either way just in case though) | 16:19 |
| cjwatson | teward: If it has no new features it doesn't need an FFe. (This is not to say that the release team will necessarily accept a relatively late change though) | 16:19 |
| foka | jbicha: But yes, thank you in advance for syncing hugo for us! :-) | 16:19 |
| foka | jbicha: I was wondering: could you sync golang-github-disintegration-imaging (1.4.1-1) and golang-github-spf13-pflag (1.0.1-1) while you are at it because hugo 0.39-1 was built with them on Debian? :-) Many thanks! | 16:21 |
| teward | cjwatson: yeah it's up to the release team. They did accept the 1.13.12 upload yesterday, though, so from that to today is not much bigger of a change. | 16:21 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nginx (bionic-proposed/main) [1.13.12-0ubuntu1 => 1.14.0-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server) | 16:22 | |
| teward | there's precedent from 16.04 for this though; we ran into this on last LTS cycle but nginx released 1.10.x stable a day *after* we released 16.04; the version numbering change was in xenial-updates though, and then later in xenial-security when we started handling some security patches. | 16:23 |
| teward | anyways, just wanted to make sure I didn't need an FFe bug. | 16:23 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: golang-github-disintegration-imaging (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.3.0-1 => 1.4.1-1] (no packageset) (sync) | 16:25 | |
| jbicha | foka: use requestsync to file a bug for golang-github-spf13-pflag, it has several rdepends so I'm not as comfortable with it | 16:25 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted golang-github-disintegration-imaging [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.4.1-1] | 16:26 | |
| foka | jbicha: Good point about golang-github-spf13-pflag, thanks for the advice! I'll do a requestsync. | 16:27 |
| jbicha | explain why it's needed and what testing you've done to ensure it doesn't break other packages | 16:28 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapcraft [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.41] | 16:44 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapcraft [source] (artful-proposed) [2.41+17.10] | 16:45 | |
| sil2100 | bdmurray: your avahi upload seems to revert changes from version ubuntu2.1 - were those conflicting/invalid/deprecated? I didn't see those mentioned in the changelog | 16:48 |
| bdmurray | sil2100: Nope, that's a blunder. | 16:55 |
| sil2100 | bdmurray: I'll reject it in that case, poke me once you re-upload and I'll re-review | 16:56 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected avahi [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.6.32~rc+dfsg-1ubuntu3] | 16:57 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: avahi (xenial-proposed/main) [0.6.32~rc+dfsg-1ubuntu2.1 => 0.6.32~rc+dfsg-1ubuntu2.2] (core) | 16:59 | |
| bdmurray | sil2100: sorted ^^ | 17:02 |
| slangasek | xnox: component-mismatches seems confused now about golang-github-spf13-cobra and its dep tree, despite me marking golang-github-ubuntu-ubuntu-report-dev Extra-Exclude; do you have any insights here? | 17:03 |
| sil2100 | bdmurray: thanks! | 17:03 |
| jbicha | slangasek: is that because of Built-Using? | 17:06 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted avahi [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.6.32~rc+dfsg-1ubuntu2.2] | 17:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ibm-java80 (xenial-proposed/partner) [8.0.5.10-0ubuntu1 => 8.0.5.11-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 17:10 | |
| foka | jbicha: On second thought, I think it is okay to keep golang-github-spf13-pflag the way it is, i.e., I think I won't bother with a requestsync, as the upstream Hugo is actually still using an older version and works just fine with it. | 17:12 |
| sdeziel | I've been warned that it's probably too late for 18.04 but I opened LP: #1764807 | 17:13 |
| ubot5` | Launchpad bug 1764807 in zfs-linux (Ubuntu) "[wishlist] please add zfsutils-linux to the seed(s)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1764807 | 17:13 |
| jbicha | foka: ok, that's easier for me too :) | 17:13 |
| slangasek | jbicha: it sure is | 17:34 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-17.18] (core, kernel) | 17:46 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxd (bionic-proposed/main) [3.0.0-0ubuntu3 => 3.0.0-0ubuntu4] (edubuntu, ubuntu-server) | 18:07 | |
| Kamilion | ctrl-f'd through the backlog, but I didn't see anything relating to xen; looks like xen 4.10 isn't going to make it into bionic, but will it show up in a point release later? | 18:26 |
| nacc | smb: --^ ? | 18:27 |
| Kamilion | 4.6 eventually took over for 4.5 on xenial; i didn't really encounter any problems with that transition | 18:29 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mutter (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.0-2 => 3.28.1-1] (desktop-extra, ubuntu-desktop) | 18:44 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: musescore-sftools (bionic-proposed/universe) [20180222-2 => 20180325-1] (no packageset) (sync) | 18:50 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted musescore-sftools [sync] (bionic-proposed) [20180325-1] | 18:50 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: musescore-sftools [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [20180325-1] (no packageset) | 18:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: musescore-sftools [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [20180325-1] (no packageset) | 18:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: musescore-sftools [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [20180325-1] (no packageset) | 18:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: musescore-sftools [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [20180325-1] (no packageset) | 18:54 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: musescore-sftools [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [20180325-1] (no packageset) | 18:54 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fluidr3mono-gm-soundfont (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.315-2 => 2.315-4] (ubuntustudio) (sync) | 18:57 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: musescore-sftools [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [20180325-1] (no packageset) | 18:58 | |
| jbicha | ^ the ffe for sftools & soundfont is bug 1761272 | 19:01 |
| ubot5` | bug 1761272 in musescore-sftools (Ubuntu) "Please sync musescore-sftools 20180325-1 (universe) and fluidr3mono-gm-soundfont 2.315-4 (universe) from Debian testing (main)" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1761272 | 19:01 |
| slangasek | infinity: oh hey, and upstream response on your failing 31-bit tests, saying that it's a kernel bug | 19:24 |
| slangasek | s/and/an/ | 19:24 |
| xnox | slangasek, as per pm, it's a built-using dependency chain trying to pull in source packages into main. | 19:36 |
| slangasek | yes | 19:36 |
| slangasek | xnox: arguing it with seb now on #distro ;) | 19:37 |
| xnox | hehe | 19:37 |
| xnox | and you had to quote an email from me about it too =) | 19:39 |
| xnox | i'm glad i picked a memorable topic for said email, and was able to quote it =)))))) | 19:39 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debian-installer (bionic-proposed/main) [20101020ubuntu536 => 20101020ubuntu537] (core) | 19:56 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted debian-installer [source] (bionic-proposed) [20101020ubuntu537] | 19:57 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (xenial-proposed/main) [2.408.28 => 2.408.29] (desktop-core) | 20:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: haproxy (bionic-proposed/main) [1.8.4-1 => 1.8.7-1] (ubuntu-server) (sync) | 20:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (bionic-proposed/main) [1:18.04.16 => 1:18.04.17] (core) | 20:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ibus (bionic-proposed/main) [1.5.17-3ubuntu3 => 1.5.17-3ubuntu4] (input-methods, kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) | 20:47 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (bionic-proposed/main) [2.521 => 2.522] (desktop-core) | 20:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: corosync (bionic-proposed/main) [2.4.2-3ubuntu1 => 2.4.3-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) | 21:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pacemaker (bionic-proposed/main) [1.1.18~rc4-1ubuntu1 => 1.1.18-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server) | 21:02 | |
| tjaalton | so, aiui it's only systemd autopkgtest on i386 which is blocking bind/isc-dhcp/bind-dyndb-ldap/freeipa from migrating? | 21:08 |
| tjaalton | and that test seems to be failing quite often | 21:08 |
| tsimonq2 | Wait... did qtbase just migrate? | 21:11 |
| tsimonq2 | Meaning, that Qt transition took a little more than a day?!? | 21:12 |
| tsimonq2 | O_O!! | 21:12 |
| tsimonq2 | YAY | 21:12 |
| valorie | \o/ | 21:17 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sddm (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.17.0-1ubuntu5 => 0.17.0-1ubuntu6] (kubuntu) | 21:24 | |
| teward | is it... unusual when autopkgtests fail because it can't find a specific package that is totally unrelated to the check being run? (Two of the s390x nginx-related autopkgtests were stuck as "Regression" statuses only because the environments couldn't find `haveged` at the time, even though it's in the repositories) | 21:29 |
| teward | (both failures were for s390x, and went away on a rerun) | 21:29 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apparmor (bionic-proposed/main) [2.12-4ubuntu4 => 2.12-4ubuntu5] (core) | 21:56 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ifupdown (xenial-proposed/main) [0.8.10ubuntu1.2 => 0.8.10ubuntu1.3] (core) | 22:00 | |
| jdstrand | fyi, that apparmor ^ is just profile fixes | 22:03 |
| xnox | teward, i know at least one case of non-atomic migrations from -proposed to -release; e.g. if a package is migrating, it may be deleted from -release and -proposed, but not yet published in -release, thus one can have intermittent state of "omg no package foo" | 22:11 |
| xnox | teward, the only way to fix this, as far as I understand, is to make a package migration process a multi-pass process. Publish into -release, then in another publishing cycle "clean-up" -proposed. Like it is done for e.g. -proposed -> -updates publication of SRUs. | 22:12 |
| xnox | teward, but in this case, haveged has not moved since artful.... do you have logs? or have you worked out what was the bug for haveged? the autopkgtest instance temporary networking failure? | 22:13 |
| teward | no idea, it succeeded with other packages, and then only died on haveged; I was reading the logs and couldn't figure it out, it almost looked like someone had never run `apt-get update` on a fresh Ubuntu install so it doesn't know if a package exists or not. https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-bionic/bionic/s390x/n/nginx/20180417_130943_7f698@/log.gz was the one I remembered | 22:28 |
| teward | to bookmark ... | 22:28 |
| teward | xnox: ^ | 22:28 |
| teward | rerunning the autopkgtests made them resolve, so it might've been a temporary glitch | 22:28 |
| teward | i'm a tad annoyed the system never *told* me autopkgtests failed | 22:28 |
| teward | until today when it said it'd been sitting in proposed for a day | 22:28 |
| xnox | teward, you should be getting emails, about your own upload, that it is stuck in proposed. I definately get such emails on daily basis. | 22:31 |
| xnox | teward, were you the uploader? | 22:32 |
| * xnox reads the log to see "the glitch" | 22:32 | |
| xnox | teward, ok, it is weird. In "test bed setup" i see that bionic-proposed is updated, but i do not see that 'bionic InRelease' is updated. | 22:34 |
| xnox | and then later, i would expect haveged to not have installation candidate. | 22:34 |
| xnox | it is odd that "bionic InRelease" is not fetched as part of the test bed setup, but bionic-proposed.... was. | 22:34 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ibm-java80 [source] (xenial-proposed) [8.0.5.11-0ubuntu1] | 22:34 | |
| * tsimonq2 thinks it would be nice to see which packages I have in devel-proposed; I lose track sometimes. | 22:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ctioga2 (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.14.1-1 => 0.14.1-2] (no packageset) (sync) | 22:37 | |
| xnox | teward, opened https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/autopkgtest/+bug/1764884 to not forget about this. | 22:37 |
| ubot5` | Ubuntu bug 1764884 in autopkgtest (Ubuntu) "An odd glitch in autopkgtest - package has no install candidates" [Undecided,New] | 22:37 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ctioga2 [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.14.1-2] | 22:37 | |
| tsimonq2 | slangasek (or any other AA that's around): Could I please get lightdm-settings processed? It's a pretty small package with simple copyright, and both Ubuntu MATE and Ubuntu Budgie have expressed interest in having the package. | 22:53 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: lightdm-settings (bionic-proposed/primary) [1.1.4-0ubuntu1] | 22:54 | |
| slangasek | tsimonq2: enotime today, sorry | 22:55 |
| tsimonq2 | slangasek: ack | 22:58 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-hwe (bionic-proposed/multiverse) [5.2.8-dfsg-10ubuntu18.04.1 => 5.2.10-dfsg-1ubuntu18.04.1] (no packageset) | 23:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox-hwe [source] (bionic-proposed) [5.2.10-dfsg-1ubuntu18.04.1] | 23:08 | |
| teward | xnox: yes I was, at least of 1.13.12 which failed the tests. | 23:15 |
| teward | and ACK on the bug being made on this | 23:15 |
| teward | xnox: also sorry for slow responsiveness, fighting horrible internet today >.> | 23:16 |
| teward | would an archive admin be able to accept nginx 1.14.0-0ubuntu1 into bionic-proposed? Between 1.13.12 and 1.14.0 is no functional changes of any kind, just a version string shift. Back in 16.04 NGINX released 1.10.x stable a day or two *after* Xenial release, so we post-release SRU'd the version string change, but I'd love to get that in before Final Freeze so that bionic itself has 1.14.0 (and so we don't need to do a post-release SRU) | 23:21 |
| teward | SRU/MRE* | 23:21 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!