[00:43] WallyWorld : have a min... [00:43] sure [00:44] hangout [00:44] ? [00:44] yup [02:55] thumper: https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/8626 :-) pretty please [02:58] not small is it [02:59] thumper: it's 99 go generated [02:59] 99% [02:59] ignore those bits [03:26] babbageclunk: got a few minutes? [03:31] wallyworld: sure [03:31] 1:1 [06:28] vino: free now [06:28] yes . [06:30] manadart: FYI https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/8626 [06:48] wallyworld: Nice. === frankban|afk is now known as frankban [07:02] thumper: you coming to team standup? [07:02] jam: also? [07:02] brt === vino is now known as vinu [08:02] vinu: back now, did you want a hangout? [08:02] sure [08:02] plz gimme 5 mins [08:02] ok [08:02] i am checking this. [08:08] excellent. it all works fine. [08:08] thanks Ian [08:08] can we hangout ? === ChanServ changed the topic of #juju-dev to: https://jujucharms.com | for most conversations, see #juju [08:37] vinu: hey, sorry, missed yout message [08:37] now ok? [08:37] yes. [08:37] i am here. [08:38] see you in standup ho === frankban is now known as frankban|afk [19:35] balloons: eatmydata is not my friend. [19:35] hml, ohh.. no dice [19:35] hml, I wouldn't want you to expend my effort as optimizing it really isn't required atm [19:35] balloons: lots of errors with adding the libary to /etc/ld.so.preload [19:36] and running eatmydata — sudo do-release-upgrade… gave me no time save [19:36] balloons: just tried a few things and gave up [19:43] hml, gotcha. Worth a try at least [19:43] balloons: maybe if someone has used it before… [20:34] Morning all o/ [21:04] so i can deploy ppc64el/arm64/amd64 fine, from an amd64 machine, using maas provider, juju 2.3.2, but 2.4-beta2 nope. bug 1765524. is there any kind of workaround i can try? [21:04] Bug #1765524: ERROR failed to bootstrap model: cannot use agent built for ARCH_X using a machine running on ARCH_Y [22:14] admcleod_: weird [22:15] i try [22:15] getting full debug for hml [22:15] thumper: i’m almost EOD if you want some fun today. :-) [22:16] hml: awesome [22:16] admcleod_: what about 2.3.6? [22:17] hml: thumper bug updated [22:18] ill try 2.3.6, sec [22:18] thanks [22:18] oh... [22:18] I know what this is [22:18] ruh roh [22:18] 2.3.2 has agents built for the other architectures, and they are available in simple streams [22:18] 2.3-beta2 isn't released [22:18] ahhh [22:18] so is just being built locally [22:18] so just the local arch is used [22:19] sorry 2.4-beta2 [22:19] since 2.4-beta1 is now released and in streams [22:19] erm [22:19] you should be able to use that [22:19] 2.3.6 didnt work [22:19] * thumper thinks [22:20] I recall some bug around architectures... [22:20] maybe ths is some config im specifying in one fo these files [22:20] nope [22:21] thumper: I would have assumed the same, diff arches need to use agents from streams. [22:21] personally I would have expected 2.3.6 to work [22:21] it seems reasonable, maybe 2.3.6 arent in streams either? [22:21] cos some builders havent run? [22:21] I'm pretty sure that we check before announcing... [22:22] trying beta1 [22:22] beta1 nope [22:22] 22:14:16 ERROR juju.cmd.juju.commands bootstrap.go:535 failed to bootstrap model: cannot use agent built for "ppc64el" using a machine running on "amd64" [22:23] 2.3.6 should definitely be in streams. beta1 won't be in released, proposed stream for beta1 [22:23] looks like the machine that was created was amd64 [22:23] ill see if i can see maas doing anything [22:23] admcleod_: you would need to set agent-stream=proposed for the beta to find the agents [22:23] k [22:23] admcleod_: can we just see if we can get 2.3.6 working? [22:23] ok [22:24] admcleod_: let's add the flag to keep broken instances so we can see what we actually get [22:24] k [22:25] ok 2.3.6 does work, i made a mistake [22:25] ah... [22:25] good [22:25] perhaps it is just the streams then [22:25] try adding the agent-stream for 2.4-beta1 bootstrap [22:26] yep sec [22:27] how do i set agent stream [22:28] * thumper looks [22:29] model defaults I think [22:30] admcleod_, thumper: --config agent-stream=proposed --model-default agent-stream=proposed [22:30] ah [22:31] proposed no, devel yes [22:31] admcleod_: doh sorry yeah beta1 is in devel [22:31] thanks! [22:32] alright, ill update my bug then [22:33] dont suppose we could have a slightly more informative error message? ;) [23:10] babbageclunk: got a few minutes to chat? [23:11] thumper: I've got standup in 4 mins [23:11] after that? [23:11] I'll be heading to the gym shortly after that [23:11] perhaps after lunch? [23:11] yup [23:13] thumper: ping me then? [23:16] babbageclunk: ack [23:46] thumper: so the reason i was trying to get 2.4-beta2 going was to see if the lxd network issues have been resolved. now i have failure to launch with 'no associated target operation' [23:46] seen that? [23:47] no [23:48] alright, bug coming a bit later