[00:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openjdk-lts (bionic-proposed/main) [10.0.1+10-1ubuntu1 => 10.0.1+10-1ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop)
[00:04] <doko> slangasek: re mercurial, no I don't know. it happens to pass after a few give backs
[00:05] <doko> slangasek: re rails: I'll have a look
[00:06] <doko> slangasek: re puppet: nacc's suggestion to force-sync. he wanted to have a look
[00:06] <mwhudson> oh hi doko
[00:06] <mwhudson> slangasek: wanna review that openjdk-lts upload?
[00:07] <mwhudson> doko: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/4hmWtqZB7J/
[00:07] <slangasek> doko: ok.  I badtest'ed mercurial on amd64+arm64 for the flakiness due to timeouts, we still have good coverage on other archs
[00:07] <slangasek> doko: so mercurial stuff is unblocked; puppet is sorted except for a failing revdep autopkgtest; and rails still needs attention
[00:12] <doko> mwhudson: that change is fine, some was in openjdk-9
[00:12] <mwhudson> doko: yeah i looked at a very small part of a 109 MiB diff first :)
[00:19] <slangasek> tsimonq2: ffmpeg? :)
[00:22] <tsimonq2> slangasek: I *just* got home. ;)  Yesterday I didn't get home until very very late...
[00:22] <tsimonq2> slangasek: Expect something before I EOD
[00:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: hackrf (bionic-proposed/universe) [2017.02.1-1 => 2018.01.1-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[00:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libpam-chroot (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.9-4.2 => 0.9-4.3] (no packageset) (sync)
[00:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted hackrf [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2018.01.1-2]
[00:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: airspy-host (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0.9-1 => 1.0.9-3] (no packageset) (sync)
[00:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libpam-chroot [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.9-4.3]
[00:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted airspy-host [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.9-3]
[00:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: musescore-general-soundfont (bionic-proposed/primary) [0.1.1-2]
[00:34] <tsimonq2> infinity, slangasek: Was any progress made on that Lubuntu perms bug?
[00:34] <tsimonq2> You know, now that we're getting ready tospin release candidates. :P
[00:37] <slangasek> tsimonq2: yes; the progress we made was that cjwatson tested, and couldn't reproduce the original bug, and I tested, and confirmed his finding
[00:37] <slangasek> so something changed, and it was good
[00:38] <tsimonq2> So, all clear?
[00:40] <slangasek> yes
[00:40] <slangasek> tsimonq2: but if it shows up again in testing, yell
[00:40] <tsimonq2> ack
[00:41]  * tsimonq2 hopes for automated testing so I no longer have to throw an ISO at a machine 100 bajillion times anymore...
[00:49] <doko> re: octave/openjdk need to look at that tomorrow. but it's working when those packages migrate in sync
[00:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openjdk-lts [source] (bionic-proposed) [10.0.1+10-1ubuntu2]
[00:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gegl (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.3.30-1 => 0.3.30-1ubuntu1] (edubuntu, ubuntugnome, ubuntustudio)
[00:55] <slangasek> doko: but the autopkgtests are still failed and your comment on the bug suggested that the current failure was unrelated
[00:56] <slangasek> ginggs: ocrmypdf autopkgtest still failed with tesseract/s390x from proposed
[01:03] <slangasek> doko: oh hey, follow-up comment on LP: #1762175 looks promissing
[01:03] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 1762175 in octave (Ubuntu) "keep java-common pointing to OpenJDK in -proposed" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1762175
[01:06] <slangasek> infinity: no touching nusakan www.prev for a bit
[01:09] <tdaitx> mwhudson: as for the 109 MiB diff, iff you were looking for a debdiff between openjdk-9 versions, I highly recommend using --no-unpack-tarballs
[01:10] <slangasek> tdaitx: I think he was trying to grab the launchpad-provided debdiff as a shortcut... and it wasn't very short :)
[01:11] <mwhudson> yeah exactly
[01:11] <mwhudson> i didn't know that option though
[01:14] <tdaitx> yeah, been there, the launchpad provided diff is not that useful for openjdk when the source itself gets updated =/
[01:19] <mwhudson> it was more an amusement than anything else :)
[01:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnustep-gui (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.26.2-2 => 0.26.2-3] (no packageset) (sync)
[01:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnustep-gui [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.26.2-3]
[01:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: octave (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.2.2-1build1.1 => 4.2.2-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[01:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted octave [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.2.2-1ubuntu1]
[01:37] <tsimonq2> slangasek: ffmpeg> Just fixed rdeps. Should be good now, assuming those migrate.
[01:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: bombono-dvd (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.2.2-0ubuntu15 => 1.2.2-0ubuntu16] (no packageset)
[01:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mythexport (bionic-proposed/multiverse) [2.2.4-0ubuntu5 => 2.2.4-0ubuntu6] (no packageset)
[01:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mythexport [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.2.4-0ubuntu6]
[01:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted bombono-dvd [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.2-0ubuntu16]
[01:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: thermald (bionic-proposed/main) [1.7.0-5 => 1.7.0-5ubuntu1] (core)
[02:02] <tsimonq2> slangasek: That peruse upload I just syncpackage'd should have fixed everything, and now we're in sync with Debian. \o/
[02:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: peruse (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.2+dfsg-1 => 1.2+dfsg-2] (kubuntu) (sync)
[02:03] <tsimonq2> slangasek: Er, you might need to approve that one. :)
[02:04] <tsimonq2> I would argue that the package currently in the release pocket is broken enough that it shouldn't be shipped in the release.
[02:10] <slangasek> tsimonq2: what specifically is broken?
[02:15] <tsimonq2> slangasek: iirc: Not enough runtime deps, incomplete debian/copyright, appstream-metadata-in-legacy-location, the dependency on peruse-common is too loose.
[02:16] <tsimonq2> But in that time, it passed through Debian NEW, got an RC bug, and I worked with lisandro and pino (in Debian) to do a good amount of polishing on the package.
[02:16] <tsimonq2> s/Not enough/Missing/
[02:16] <tsimonq2> (That's off the top of my head, granular details may be different.)
[02:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tlslite-ng (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.7.0-3 => 0.7.4-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[02:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tlslite-ng [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.7.4-1]
[03:25] <slangasek> tsimonq2: from what I see there's no loose dep on peruse-common because there's no peruse-common binary package in the version currently in bionic ;)
[03:26] <tsimonq2> slangasek: Oh, right. :)
[03:26] <tsimonq2> slangasek: That's another thing, splitting of arch:all files into an arch:all binary.
[03:26] <tsimonq2> slangasek: But, thanks. :)
[03:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted peruse [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.2+dfsg-2]
[03:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: peruse [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.2+dfsg-2] (kubuntu)
[03:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemd (bionic-proposed/main) [237-3ubuntu8 => 237-3ubuntu9] (core)
[04:04] <xnox> infinity, ^ =)
[04:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted peruse [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [1.2+dfsg-2]
[04:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pkgbinarymangler (bionic-proposed/main) [136 => 137] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[04:21] <slangasek> infinity: ^^ that's me trying to fix the failures to build the new linux-signed packages (spins forever waiting for a lock it will never get, because the lockfile claims foo-dbgsym is next).  I think it's generic and safe in the rare cases that it matters, but I'll leave it for your review
[05:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-meta (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0.17.18 => 4.15.0.18.19] (core, kernel) (sync)
[05:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-17.18 => 4.15.0-18.19] (core, kernel) (sync)
[05:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-signed (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-17.18 => 4.15.0-18.19+signed1] (core, kernel) (sync)
[05:27] <slangasek> infinity: ^^ are you available to review the kernels or should I plan to review them a bit later this evening?
[05:27] <slangasek> also it looks like this is a binary sync of linux-signed rather than source-only
[05:29] <flocculant> slangasek: thanks for ubiquity fix
[05:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected linux-signed [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-18.19+signed1]
[05:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-signed (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-17.18 => 4.15.0-18.19+signed1] (core, kernel) (sync)
[06:03] <ginggs> slangasek: ocrmypdf, weird, I'm pretty sure it passed when I tested against the version in my PPA - but failing an autopkgtest, when there is no ocrpdf in -release is not a regression, is it? would you force-badtest it on s390x?
[06:06] <acheronuk> tsimonq2 slangasek: peruse is broken. https://i.imgur.com/ywzPhw6.png
[06:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: open-vm-tools (artful-proposed/main) [2:10.1.10-3ubuntu0.1 => 2:10.2.0-3~ubuntu0.17.10.1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server)
[06:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: open-vm-tools (xenial-proposed/main) [2:10.0.7-3227872-5ubuntu1~16.04.2 => 2:10.2.0-3~ubuntu0.16.04.1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server)
[06:30] <slangasek> ginggs: it's a regression in the sense that we'd be letting in a package that we know to be broken
[06:35] <acheronuk> slangasek: going to fix peruse that if ok? LP: #1765605
[06:35] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 1765605 in peruse (Ubuntu) "peruse fails to start - missing runtime dep on " [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1765605
[06:36] <slangasek> acheronuk: yes please
[06:37] <acheronuk> hmmm. peruse 1.2 is a kirigami v1 based application, but debian removed kirigami 1 after stretch!
[06:37] <acheronuk> so debian are going have a slight problem fixing there!
[06:38] <acheronuk> we kept in case peruse could be got in
[06:38] <acheronuk> *kept it
[06:50] <infinity> slangasek: I'm around tonight and sort of on Andy's TZ.
[06:51] <infinity> slangasek: Unless you're already on it.
[06:51] <infinity> slangasek: Was planning to start "work" in an hour or so.
[06:51] <slangasek> infinity: I haven't gotten there yet and am about to drop off
[06:51] <slangasek> infinity: so I'm happy to leave it to you
[06:52] <infinity> slangasek: Works for me.
[06:53] <infinity> apw: Also, could we get a linux-signed that isn't a derp version number?  That version might have been burned in a PPA, but it wasn't burned in the archive.
[07:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: peruse (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.2+dfsg-2 => 1.2+dfsg-2ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[07:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cpprest (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.10.2-3 => 2.10.2-5] (no packageset) (sync)
[07:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cpprest [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.10.2-5]
[08:05] <apw> infinity, ack
[08:09] <acheronuk> apw or other AA: please don't accept that peruse yet. may need another patch
[08:12] <apw> acheronuk, shall i reject it, you can always upload it again
[08:12] <acheronuk> fine by me
[08:12] <infinity> apw: Going to go eat, then I'll be here all night to get those kernels rolling (and do some java boostrap thing, apparently), etc.
[08:13] <apw> infinity, great, will go and sync my trees and find that signed source
[08:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected peruse [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.2+dfsg-2ubuntu1]
[08:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected linux-signed [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-18.19+signed1]
[08:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted thermald [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.7.0-5ubuntu1]
[08:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: peruse (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.2+dfsg-2 => 1.2+dfsg-2ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[08:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-signed (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-17.18 => 4.15.0-18.19] (core, kernel)
[08:40] <acheronuk> apw or other AA: ^^^ re-uploaded. I built and tested peruse with that patch I added. needed to fix access to store.kde.org 'newstuff'
[08:54] <tjaalton> doko: hi, tomcat8.0 can now be removed, but sadly dogtag-pki still needs resteasy 3.0.x.. so I wonder if resteasy 3.1 should be made an ugly "really.3.0.19-1" or what?
[08:55] <tjaalton> dogtag is the only thing that needs it. there's resteasy 3.5 which should be compatible with 3.0 plus stuff from 4.0~ but it turned out to be too much to package for me with little time
[09:56] <mapreri> Could I ask you to approve the src:pencil2d sitting in the queue?  It's a very minor bugfix only release…
[10:33] <tseliot> apw: hey, are you going to have a look at my nvidia upload? A couple of metapackages will end up in NEW (as I renamed them)
[10:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apt (bionic-proposed/main) [1.6 => 1.6.1] (core)
[10:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pkgbinarymangler [source] (bionic-proposed) [137]
[10:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gegl [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.3.30-1ubuntu1]
[10:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apt [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.6.1]
[10:54] <infinity> tseliot: Do those :i386 deps actually work?
[10:54] <infinity> I didn't think that was supported.
[10:55] <infinity> Huh, so it does.
[10:55] <infinity> Fancy.
[10:55] <infinity> Also, holy crap, why is libnvidia-compute so huge?
[10:55] <infinity> After this operation, 170 MB of additional disk space will be used.
[10:56] <infinity> Unstripped binaries?
[10:56] <tseliot> infinity: we are not allowed to strip the binaries
[10:56] <infinity> I always used to strip them.
[10:56] <infinity> Did they give us a slap?
[10:56] <infinity> Can we ask them nicely to provide stripped ones? :P
[10:57] <tseliot> good luck with that ;)
[10:58] <infinity> Did they explicitly yell at us for stripping, or are you just inferring from the license that that constitutes modification and is thus bad?
[10:58] <infinity> (cause I totally used to strip nvidia and fglrx in LRM and no one said a word)
[10:59] <tseliot> infinity: this part comes from the Debian packaging: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/wV4z2p6B6D/
[11:00] <infinity> Actually, these *are* stripped.
[11:00] <tseliot> it seems quite clear to me "provided that the binary files thereof are not modified in any way (except for unzipping of compressed files)."
[11:00] <infinity> libnvidia-compiler.so.390.48 is just enormous.
[11:00] <tseliot> well, nothing I can do about that
[11:01] <infinity> Does it include an embedded copy of nvcc/icc?
[11:01] <infinity> I bet it does.
[11:01] <infinity> 46M
[11:01] <infinity> Wow.
[11:01] <infinity> tseliot: Alright, yes, not your fault.  I'm just going to back away slowly.
[11:01] <infinity> Dearest nvidia, double-u tee eff.
[11:02] <tseliot> :D
[11:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-prime (bionic-proposed/main) [0.8.7 => 0.8.8] (ubuntu-desktop)
[11:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted systemd [source] (bionic-proposed) [237-3ubuntu9]
[12:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zfs-linux (xenial-proposed/main) [0.6.5.6-0ubuntu20 => 0.6.5.6-0ubuntu21] (no packageset)
[12:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zfs-linux (artful-proposed/main) [0.6.5.11-1ubuntu3.3 => 0.6.5.11-1ubuntu3.4] (core)
[12:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mate-terminal (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.20.0-3ubuntu1 => 1.20.0-4] (ubuntu-mate, ubuntukylin) (sync)
[12:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected linux-signed [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-18.19]
[12:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-signed (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-17.18 => 4.15.0-18.19] (core, kernel)
[12:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pencil2d (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.6.1-1 => 0.6.1.1-1] (edubuntu) (sync)
[13:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libnih (bionic-proposed/main) [1.0.3-6ubuntu1 => 1.0.3-6ubuntu2] (core)
[13:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sddm (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.17.0-1ubuntu6 => 0.17.0-1ubuntu7] (kubuntu)
[13:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libdebian-installer (bionic-proposed/main) [0.110ubuntu1 => 0.110ubuntu2] (core)
[13:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: manpages-de (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4-1 => 2.5-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[13:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted manpages-de [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.5-1]
[13:48] <juliank> libnih, libdebian-installer fix tiny FTBFS due to changed parser results from libexpat, missing include
[13:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-meta [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0.18.19]
[13:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-18.19]
[13:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-signed [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-18.19]
[13:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-meta [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0.18.19]
[13:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-18.19]
[13:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-signed [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-18.19]
[13:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-meta [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0.18.19]
[13:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-18.19]
[13:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-signed [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-18.19]
[13:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: javabeans-activation-framework (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.2.0-1 => 1.2.0-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[13:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libdebian-installer [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.110ubuntu2]
[13:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-meta [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0.18.19]
[13:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-18.19]
[13:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: javabeans-activation-framework (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.2.0-1 => 1.2.0-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[13:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libnih [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.3-6ubuntu2]
[13:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sddm [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.17.0-1ubuntu7]
[13:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-signed [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-18.19]
[13:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted javabeans-activation-framework [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.0-1ubuntu1]
[13:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pencil2d [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.6.1.1-1]
[13:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mate-terminal [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.20.0-4]
[13:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted peruse [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.2+dfsg-2ubuntu1]
[14:35] <acheronuk>  sddm, peruse, and mate-terminal builds all stuck on "INFO: pkgstripfiles: waiting for lock"
[14:35] <cjwatson> (probably a pkgbinarymangler bug, or maybe something that uses parallelism in a way that confuses pkgbinarymangler)
[14:36] <acheronuk> same for libdebian-installer
[14:38] <acheronuk> pkgbinarymangler (137) bionic; urgency=medium "* Fix pkgstripfiles to not fail to clear the lock when processing dbgsym packages."
[14:39] <apw> acheronuk, that likely is not installed in those builds
[14:39] <cjwatson> ?
[14:39] <cjwatson> pkgstripfiles wouldn't be complaining if it weren't installed
[14:40] <apw> cjwatson, /me not clear enough
[14:40] <apw> cjwatson, i think 137 is intended to fix that problem, and i was conjecturing it was too new to have been in the builds for peruse
[14:40] <cjwatson> Oh, right
[14:40] <apw> cjwatson, as it was only accepted 2 hours
[14:40] <cjwatson> Sure, could be - cancel and retry?
[14:40] <apw> ago ...
[14:40] <acheronuk> 137 was published to release pocket 2hrs ago
[14:40] <apw> sounds like a plan to me
[14:40] <acheronuk> so launchpad says
[14:41] <cjwatson> if you cancel and wait for the log, then it should tell you what version it used
[14:41] <cjwatson> also I suppose it's possible there's a regression in 137
[14:41] <Laney> https://launchpadlibrarian.net/366554696/buildlog_ubuntu-bionic-amd64.sddm_0.17.0-1ubuntu7_CANCELLING.txt.gz 137
[14:42] <apw> Laney, that says there is a problem with 137 i think then
[14:43] <acheronuk> ditto on peruse build I just cancelled
[14:45] <apw> bah and that has made it to -release
[14:45] <apw> cjwatson, would removing that from -release and publising 136 back work in this context ?
[14:47] <cjwatson> In principle, yes, but a straight revert might actually be faster.
[14:48] <cjwatson> (as well as easier to do -> safer)
[14:48] <apw> cjwatson, can i build pkgmangler with this in play, i guess it only breaks -dbgsym packages
[14:48] <cjwatson> Since all you have to do is get it published in -proposed in order for it to be used for builds, and -proposed is faster to publish.
[14:48] <apw> lets try that then
[14:48] <cjwatson> Good question.  Try it :)
[14:50] <Laney> Hang on, let's spend 5 minutes looking at this
[14:52] <apw> Laney, i dont' see why we need to wait for the lock for -dbgsym files, as we do nothing once we have the lock
[14:53] <apw> Laney, but either way it looks 'fine'
[14:54] <apw> it looks fine before without the change, in the sense i only uses the lock for not dbgsym packages
[14:54] <apw> and though daft after the change it also looks fine
[15:01] <Laney> ah right
[15:02] <Laney> apw: so look in dh_builddeb, it initialises the lockfile with all packages
[15:03] <Laney> and then those are cleared out by pkgstripfiles as it finishes
[15:03] <Laney> but that initialisation doesn't include automatic debug packages
[15:03] <Laney> so basically this upload looks wrong, but I'm not sure what problem Steve was seeing?
[15:03] <Laney> peer review of those claims would be appreciated
[15:04] <apw> Laney, so the problem he was seeing was we had to have our -dbgsym packages at the end of the control file
[15:04] <apw> Laney, oh ... but of course _our_ dbgsym files are real, actually in control
[15:04] <Laney> "our"?
[15:04] <Laney> kernel?
[15:04] <apw> "in the kernel package that triggered this issue" i think it was linux-signed specifically
[15:04] <apw> that lead to that upload
[15:04] <apw> sforshee, ^
[15:05] <apw> _oh_ so that makes snese
[15:05] <apw> packges have to be handled in _order_ from the "lockfile" right ?
[15:05] <apw> and we would never remove a -dbgsym from the file, so if they are at the bottom
[15:06] <sforshee> yes, that
[15:06] <apw> we just don't notice there are 3 left, but if they are in the middle we will get stuck
[15:06] <apw> becuase anything after the first one never gets to play
[15:07] <apw> Laney, so i think it makes sense to check if we are in the lockfile and then do it, else not
[15:07] <apw> _or_ always skip -dbgsym files as we did before
[15:08] <apw> and have a bodge in wait_for_lock which removes anyting -sdbsym from the list
[15:08] <apw> Laney, opinions ?
[15:08] <apw> i can try either
[15:08] <Laney> Is there a reason to be acting on dbgsym packages?
[15:08] <Laney> You could filter them out in dh_builddeb too, so they never appear in the lockfile
[15:09] <sforshee> apw: do we really need to do this business of putting unsigned in the name of the dbgsym file from the kernel package? If we didn't do that we wouldn't need those packages in meta.
[15:09] <apw> sforshee, yes
[15:09] <apw> sforshee, because launchpad won't accept a -dbgsym for a package you don't upload
[15:09] <sforshee> ah
[15:10] <apw> as i found out from teh upload failure i got when i did it the other way :)
[15:13] <apw> Laney, how about: http://paste.ubuntu.com/p/8MVP54pzWs/
[15:15] <apw> no that won't work either
[15:15] <apw> becasue all those waiters will do it, derp
[15:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-drivers-common (bionic-proposed/main) [1:0.5.1 => 1:0.5.2] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[15:18] <Laney> one second
[15:19] <apw> Laney, so i think _that_ would be safe, though vile: http://paste.ubuntu.com/p/2ytt32nyKB/
[15:20] <coreycb> slangasek: i'll take a look at networking-arista
[15:21] <apw> Laney, nope even that isn't safe, needs to be in the other order
[15:21]  * apw casually wonders why this isn't just a lockfile, with like flock
[15:31] <xnox> i'm late to the party, and apw/laney will fix the waiting for lock soon, right? cause systemd build is stuck doing that for 3h now. Which is not good.
[15:32] <xnox> should i cancel and restart those builds? they typically take about 15minutes or so
[15:33] <infinity> xnox: Canceling and restarting won't help as long as the bug isn't fixed. :P
[15:34] <Laney> apw: I was thinking something like https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/Mw55mD3tSk/
[15:34]  * apw wonders what Laney has planned if anything
[15:34] <acheronuk> cancel now. restart later is the plan I hope
[15:34]  * Laney sprays you all with a cold hose
[15:34] <Laney> BECALM!
[15:34] <apw> Laney, that looks sane enough to me, and beter than anything i have
[15:35] <apw> didn't realise that was in pkgmangler too
[15:35]  * xnox is a wet puppy now
[15:35] <apw> Laney, assuming that is the only thing that is used for of course
[15:36] <Laney> ya, have a look at dh_builddeb in pkgbinarymangler
[15:37] <Laney> anybody else want to review?
[15:40] <Laney> this is "a problem shared is a problem halved" working in a negative sense. :P
[15:40] <Laney> just uploaded, please to review
[15:41] <apw> Laney, yeah looks ok in the sense there is no consumers of "packages other than it
[15:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pkgbinarymangler (bionic-proposed/main) [137 => 138] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[15:42] <Laney> apw: you probably want to check your original case
[15:42] <Laney> I did a test build of sddm
[15:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nautilus (bionic-proposed/main) [1:3.26.3-0ubuntu3 => 1:3.26.3-0ubuntu4] (ubuntu-desktop)
[15:44] <apw> Laney, yeah both bits look sane to me
[15:45] <apw> Laney, this can't really break it any worse either
[15:45] <Laney> could probably even remove that case statement now
[15:45] <Laney> but it's belt and braces I guess
[15:45] <apw> i am not sure we don't still process them the other ways right ?
[15:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pkgbinarymangler [source] (bionic-proposed) [138]
[15:46] <apw> but whatever, it is definatly all of those belt-n-braces-n-string-n-gum
[15:53] <apw> Laney, i don't know whether i am happy or sad this thing has such extensive tests
[15:54] <Laney> :D
[15:54] <Laney> clearly not quite extensive enough
[15:54] <apw> there is that, well he should have added tests, and they would have failed
[16:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-18.19] (core, kernel)
[16:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-18.19] (core, kernel)
[16:29] <slangasek> doko: octave-io is cleared; octave + java-common is just waiting for an override of the flaky octave-symbolic (unless the current retry happens to finally pass), plus closing the blocking bug
[16:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: candid (bionic-proposed/primary) [1.0.0~alpha+201804191824-24b36a9-0ubuntu1]
[16:30] <nacc> doko: yeah, i had forgotten why we had the delta, but your merge was still wrong :)
[16:30] <nacc> doko: totally my fault on the sync suggestion
[16:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libcommons-lang3-java (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.5-2 => 3.5-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[16:36] <Laney> xnox: acheronuk you can retry now
[16:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libcommons-lang3-java [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.5-2ubuntu1]
[16:37] <acheronuk> Laney: just did :)
[16:37] <Laney> k
[16:39] <acheronuk> some success on faster builders. waiting on the slower ones
[16:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: haproxy (bionic-proposed/main) [1.8.7-1 => 1.8.8-1] (ubuntu-server) (sync)
[16:42] <nacc> slangasek: --^ fyi, new haproxy sync which includes an up-to-now embargoed CVE fix
[16:48] <slangasek> nacc: I'm on vacation today, infinity should drive the accepts in the run up to candidate image prep
[16:49] <nacc> slangasek: sorry for the noise! Enjoy your vacation
[16:55] <slangasek> apw, Laney: sorry for the pkgbinarymangler regression.  We probably could've done without 137 after sforshee changed the linux-signed debian/control, but
[17:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: surefire (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.20.1-3 => 2.20.1-3build1] (no packageset)
[17:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nautilus [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:3.26.3-0ubuntu4]
[17:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted surefire [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.20.1-3build1]
[17:31] <coreycb> slangasek: jamespage: i uploaded a new version of networking-arista to bionic that reverts the py3 support back to py2 since we don't have python3-neutron in ubuntu yet
[17:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: networking-arista (bionic-proposed/universe) [2017.2.2-2 => 2017.2.2-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[17:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted networking-arista [source] (bionic-proposed) [2017.2.2-2ubuntu1]
[17:36] <xnox> coreycb, sad. Let's see if we can manage py3 openstack by 20.04. If not default, at least some deployment types.
[17:37] <coreycb> xnox: we're planning to work on it in the coming release. note though that upstream openstack is still not fully py3 compatible.
[17:38] <xnox> coreycb, yeah, i've been trying to track status. And it was a "release goal something" in the previous release, but not this one. Not sure how it is best to see or track upstream status for it.
[17:39] <coreycb> xnox: there's this, though i've not looked in a while to see how updated it is: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Python3
[17:40] <coreycb> xnox: there are some 2018 notes in there so it seems to be maintained
[17:41] <coreycb> xnox: anyway, planning to start digging in soon after bionic release
[17:41] <xnox> cool
[18:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-notifier (bionic-proposed/main) [3.191 => 3.192] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[18:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: jquery-i18n.js (bionic-proposed/primary) [1.1.2+dfsg1-2]
[18:10] <tsimonq2> infinity: It would be good to get bug 1763611 fixed before the release.
[18:10] <ubot5`> bug 1763611 in lubuntu-meta (Ubuntu) "Lubuntu bionic boots slower than the other Ubuntu flavours with some SSDs" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1763611
[18:10] <tsimonq2> Could you please take a look?
[18:11] <tsimonq2> I'm willing to bet that I'm missing a package.
[18:13] <cjwatson> tsimonq2: Lubuntu builds with --no-install-recommends, and ureadahead is a Recommends of ubuntu-standard
[18:13] <cjwatson> so that would be my first guess
[18:14] <tsimonq2> Aha.
[18:14] <tsimonq2> cjwatson: You're welcome to JFD that seed change, or I can later.
[18:14] <tsimonq2> Thanks.
[18:14] <cjwatson> Though it does seem to be in your live image.  But there may some some detail along those lines, anyway, it might depend on exact installation method
[18:14] <tsimonq2> Ah.
[18:15] <cjwatson> (and I don't have especially up-to-date seed checkouts either, so ICBW)_
[18:15] <cjwatson> I don't do it, trying to get a few last-minute LP changes done before my EOW
[18:15] <cjwatson> *won't
[18:15] <tsimonq2> OK.
[18:15] <cjwatson> I seem to be all about the typoes today
[18:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-notifier (artful-proposed/main) [3.186 => 3.186.1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[18:18] <bdmurray> sil2100: Are you still about?
[18:18] <tsimonq2> Typos or typoes? ;P
[18:18] <gQuigs> tsimonq2: the linked bug's last comment indicates it's a swap file issue.. ..
[18:19] <cjwatson> Probably typos
[18:20] <tsimonq2> gQuigs: So then what might be the difference between Lubuntu and others?
[18:27] <gQuigs> tsimonq2: I'd wager it's an ubiquity bug because  they use zram
[18:28] <tsimonq2> Ah, I see.
[18:29] <tsimonq2> Thanks for the pointer gQuigs.
[18:29] <gQuigs> and the issue involves an extra resume file...  - https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-installer/ubiquity/trunk/view/head:/scripts/plugininstall.py
[18:30] <gQuigs> the resume_partition bits have a check for zram..
[18:33] <sil2100> bdmurray: yeah
[18:33] <sil2100> bdmurray: what's up?
[18:33] <bdmurray> sil2100: an sru review of update-notifier would be nice.
[18:34] <sil2100> bdmurray: oh, sure, on it in 5 mins
[18:34] <sil2100> cjwatson: btw. the requested langpack export ended up a delta one, I guess the checkbox wasn't fully checked
[18:34] <sil2100> cjwatson: should I checkbox it myself an request a re-run of the earlier command?
[18:34] <sil2100> Would that be enough for triggering a full export?
[18:37] <cjwatson> Should be.  Maybe Laurent forgot to submit that form first or something?
[18:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-kvm (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1004.4 => 4.15.0-1006.6] (kernel) (sync)
[18:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-meta-kvm (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0.1004.4 => 4.15.0.1006.6] (kernel) (sync)
[18:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-aws (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1003.3 => 4.15.0-1005.5] (kernel, ubuntu-budgie) (sync)
[18:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-meta-aws (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0.1003.3 => 4.15.0.1005.5] (kernel, ubuntu-budgie) (sync)
[18:45] <sil2100> bdmurray: ok, sounds sane, better than having nothing
[18:45] <sil2100> infinity: I'm approving update-notifier for bionic too ^
[18:46] <bdmurray> sil2100: its not great but again better than nothing.
[18:46] <sil2100> Not a release blocker for bionic, but we should have it in bionic to accept it for artful, and for artful I find it quite ekhm, important
[18:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted update-notifier [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.192]
[18:48] <sil2100> bdmurray: both accepted, thanks!
[18:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted update-notifier [source] (artful-proposed) [3.186.1]
[19:30] <gQuigs> happy to help :)
[19:35] <tsimonq2> gQuigs: I said thanks in the bug report, but thanks here. :)
[19:46] <davecore> it looks like the 18.04 release notes have some issues with the daily image links   https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BionicBeaver/ReleaseNotes
[19:46] <davecore> 1) in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BionicBeaver/ReleaseNotes#Download_Ubuntu_18.04_LTS ,      this link really points only to desktop :    http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily-live/current/ (Ubuntu Desktop and debian-installer based Server)
[19:46] <davecore> 2) and then in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BionicBeaver/ReleaseNotes#Server_installer     for the alternate installer  I think we should point  to   http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-server/daily/current   instead
[19:49] <xnox> davecore, these are still beta notes, you may ignore all of that.
[19:49] <xnox> davecore, testing of the milestone should be done based on the URLs from the ISO tracker
[19:50] <xnox> davecore, release notes will point at the release locations, not at dailies, and not at RC image locations and names.
[19:50] <xnox> final notes will not have links for dailies.
[19:51] <davecore> xnox: understood, thank you
[20:34] <slangasek> tsimonq2: ffmpeg still not migrating; now that the arch-any revdeps of libav-tools have been resolved, update_output shows some x86-only revdeps
[20:35] <slangasek> tsimonq2: (dvdrip, pictor, videoporama)
[20:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-18.19]
[20:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-18.19]
[20:42] <gaughen> slangasek, infinity, sil2100 - the fix for this bug - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netplan.io/+bug/1765833 - needs to land before release imo.  It's a blocking issue for a cloud partner.
[20:42] <ubot5`> Ubuntu bug 1765833 in netplan.io (Ubuntu) "bond intervals default to seconds; breaks existing configs" [Undecided,New]
[20:42] <gaughen> rharper has a proposed fix
[20:42] <gaughen> and cyphermox is going to review
[20:44] <tsimonq2> slangasek: Gah. Thanks.
[21:22] <rbalint> xnox, infinity, slangasek: can this go in before the release? using the fix fixed xenia - > bionic upgrade for me LP: #1748659
[21:22] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 1748659 in systemd (Ubuntu) "Windows 10 Ubuntu 16.04 upgrade to 18.04: package systemd 235-3ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: installed systemd package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1" [Critical,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1748659
[21:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-meta-raspi2 (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.15.0.1006.4 => 4.15.0.1008.6] (kernel) (sync)
[21:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-raspi2 (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.15.0-1006.7 => 4.15.0-1008.9] (kernel) (sync)
[21:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apport (xenial-proposed/main) [2.20.1-0ubuntu2.16 => 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.17] (core)
[21:51] <tsimonq2> infinity, slangasek: Lubuntu considers fixing bug 1763611 to be release-critical. MP here: https://code.launchpad.net/~tsimonq2/ubiquity/lp-1763611/+merge/343742
[21:51] <ubot5`> bug 1763611 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "Lubuntu bionic boots slower than the other Ubuntu flavours with some SSDs" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1763611
[21:55] <nacc> infinity: slangasek: fyi, the puppet revdep regression appears to also exist in debian, where it claims it has never passed
[21:55] <nacc> infinity: additionally, I *think* the regression is actually in facter based upon some brief googling i did into the error a while ago
[22:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apport (bionic-proposed/main) [2.20.9-0ubuntu5 => 2.20.9-0ubuntu6] (core)
[22:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: indicator-sound (bionic-proposed/universe) [12.10.2+17.10.20170829.1-0ubuntu2 => 12.10.2+18.04.20180420.3-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[22:43] <slangasek> rbalint: LP: #1748659 would from my perspective be best-effort for GA since we don't turn on upgrades between LTSes until .1 by default.  If someone uploads to the queue, we would evaluate it
[22:43] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 1748659 in systemd (Ubuntu) "Windows 10 Ubuntu 16.04 upgrade to 18.04: package systemd 235-3ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: installed systemd package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1" [Critical,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1748659
[22:44] <slangasek> nacc: running 'retry-autopkgtest-regressions --blocks puppet --no-proposed | xargs -rn1 -P10 wget --load-cookies ~/.cache/autopkgtest.cookie -O-' to confirm whether it's puppet-triggered
[22:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-guest-additions-iso (bionic-proposed/multiverse) [5.2.10-2 => 5.2.11-122181-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[22:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox-guest-additions-iso [sync] (bionic-proposed) [5.2.11-122181-1]
[22:44] <nacc> slangasek: thanks
[23:20] <tsimonq2> slangasek: ffmpeg> Should be good now, I think.
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dvdrip (bionic-proposed/multiverse) [1:0.98.11-0ubuntu6 => 1:0.98.11-0ubuntu7] (no packageset)
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: videoporama (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.8.1-0ubuntu6 => 0.8.1-0ubuntu7] (no packageset)
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pictor (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.38-0ubuntu1 => 2.38-0ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dvdrip [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:0.98.11-0ubuntu7]
[23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted videoporama [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.8.1-0ubuntu7]
[23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pictor [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.38-0ubuntu2]
[23:25] <tsimonq2> slangasek: This FTBFS is unrelated to what I changed (I just changed a runtime dep): https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dvdrip/1:0.98.11-0ubuntu7
[23:26] <tsimonq2> Sigh.