[00:15] krytarik, it keeps telling me when I try to rename the template to issue 524 that it already exists but when I go to it it says no such page [00:19] Well, 1.) you don't rename the template, and 2.) the workflow is: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuWeeklyNewsletter/Issue524 → find and pick the template there [00:21] Thanks, that is the step I am missing [00:21] * Bashing-om begins to pay attention . [00:25] rail [00:25] sorry [00:25] ruby! [00:28] :) - but the word was intended for another window... [00:34] I did it from the link you posted but it still has the template name and not 524? Now do I rename the page like last week? [00:35] rename the address of the page? [00:35] krytarik, ^^^ [00:54] I got it [00:54] Bashing-om, You here? [00:55] Wild_Man: Well, since 1.) the page doesn't exist yet still, and 2.) I had no issue editing it (i.e. no lock), it seems you aren't doing it right - otoh, just click dis: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuWeeklyNewsletter/Issue524?action=edit&template=UbuntuWeeklyNewsletter%2FIssueTemplate ...Oh crap, you edited the template again just now. [00:56] This time though, I'm gonna let you fix it too. [00:57] Wild_Man: yeah . I here . [01:00] krytarik, I need to revert the changes I just made to the page? [01:01] I see it is wrong [01:02] Yes, just rename back, drop the added comment(s) at the top (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuWeeklyNewsletter/Issue524?action=diff&rev2=231&rev1=230), and start with the original instructions or just click the link I posted above. [01:05] It says template already exists, will not let me rename it [01:06] There should be a revert changes option [01:11] Still will not let me rename the page [01:17] There is nothing I can do to fix it since it will not let me rename it back to IssueTemplate, when I went to the link earlier it showed 524 does not exist I typed Issuetemplate and it brought up the template but still did not show the name 524 like I thought it would be I figure it pulled in the template and now I can rename it without issue [01:22] When I said "find and pick", I meant in the list below on the page that doesn't exist yet. [01:22] Also, you figured to rename the page once, you'll figure it a second time. [01:26] I tried that too but it still came out the same way, I did not realize renaming the page was wrong last week, I thought it was only wrong because I add the the first part of the wiki name to it. I started a new med last night for severe nerve pain and it has feeling sleepy, I can not get the page to rename so I am not going to get beating my head against the wall tonight, I am not up to it [01:27] The copy and past and pulling all the info from the scripts would tale a couple of hours probably for me but not if I can not get the page with the proper name to show [01:32] Wild_Man: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuWeeklyNewsletter/Issue524?action=RenamePage&rev=231 - do you get an error message when you try there? [01:34] krytarik, yes as I said "A page with the name 'UbuntuWeeklyNewsletter/IssueTemplate' already exists. Try a different name." I wonder if the server needs time to update [01:37] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuWeeklyNewsletter/IssueTemplate - well, what I currently get there, suggests otherwise anyway. [01:38] I get that page too when I go to the template, that is what I got for page 524 [01:39] krytarik, I made the changes, will it let you rename the page? [01:49] krytarik, do we when we pull up the template do we copy and paste it to the new post? any other way I do it makes it where it needs renamed [01:50] No, the correct way is how I described it first, and then also linked. [01:51] Sorry I am missing something or it is not working correctly for me most likely the first one [01:54] krytarik, form logs last Monday "Wild_Man: So guess the proper workflow from now is: delete the current page, visit https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuWeeklyNewsletter/Issue523 where it then asks if you want to create a new page, and the select the page template we have from there." that is what I did. [01:54] Like also stated above again. [01:54] Yes [01:55] the name had to be changed at some point correct? when I did that it renamed the whole template [01:55] But did you notice the long list of both templates and alternative pages offered below on the page then? [01:56] I saw hundreds, was there one with issue 524 in all that mess. [01:57] No, it didn't have to be changed - we create a new page based on the template we pick in the list there -- and *not* just go to the template page itself in whatever way from there and hack directly on it. [01:57] before I saved the template as 524? [01:58] how do we pick that template if I do not click on it? [01:58] Before you renamed the template, yes it was listed there. [01:58] I did not know that [01:59] You have to click on the *left* side - the right goes to the page directly. [02:00] that is the missing bit I needed but now it will not rename, I imagine we need to wait for the server to see catch up [02:00] I was on the left side [02:00] right side [02:01] I am going to rest, I can not do anything until it will let me rename the template, I just tried again [02:02] If I try to rename it and it works, then...! :P [02:03] It does not mean I do not know how to rename, it means it will not let me do it for some reason [02:04] moin can be contrary and especially when we are still learning with iut [02:04] No, not working here either - good job! :P [02:06] When I break it I really do it [02:06] Otherwise, well you could already prepare the page content locally, of course. [02:07] Put it in Libreoffice then it can be copied later? [02:07] text editor? [02:07] ..Yep, simple text editor please! :P [02:08] okay [02:08] Bashing-om, you still here? [02:10] Wild_Man: Yeah ,... But " I know nothing " . [02:12] Bashing-om, do you think you can do a search on the forum for the five top threads using the dates for this past week, just through yesterday [02:13] Using the link in the now renamed template though please. [02:14] Like it says there, 1.) open the link, 2.) pass the bot check, 3.) pick the first 5 threads that are "x days" [02:15] krytarik: Wild_Man : " Using the link in the now renamed template though" ?? I am lost at the start . [02:17] Bashing-om, Just email it to me please at wildmanne39@ubuntu.com [02:17] Wild_Man: I have no idea of which script in reference here ..or how to use it . [02:18] Wild_Man: I'll pastebin them for you in 5. [02:18] Okay thanks krytarik [02:19] Bashing-om, I am just talking about a manual advanced search on the forum [02:21] Wild_Man: K on the manual search . Just to be clear ^ us that what krytarik is now doing ( pastebin them for you in 5.) ?? [02:22] us/is* [02:23] Bashing-om, yes krytarik is going to do it, thanks though [02:23] I have botched the wiki enough for one night [02:24] Wild_Man: http://paste.openstack.org/show/oEu6mBx7PAG8R7Hk6vhC/ [02:27] Thanks krytarik [02:43] Wild_Man: Try this instead: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuWeeklyNewsletter/Issue524?action=recall&rev=230 → "More Actions" → "Revert to this revision" [02:55] krytarik, looking [02:57] krytarik, then just click revert and that will revert to the template? [02:58] Yes, might want to enter a comment too though. [02:59] ok [03:01] The template still shows https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuWeeklyNewsletter/IssueTemplate [03:02] Looks about right then, no? :P [03:03] No, it says "This page does not exist yet. You can create a new empty page, or use one of the page templates." [03:03] do we need to cleat cache? [03:04] krytarik, clearing cache did not work [03:05] Yeah, didn't work indeed - try again to just rename back? [03:06] ok [03:07] krytarik, nope! [03:08] Ok, continue with the compiling then.. :P [03:12] I will post it to openstack when I am done so you can work on it before I get back on tomorrow [04:28] Wandering off to bed ..take this up tomorrow - \o [04:33] krytarik, here is the letter, I think I have it completed but I am tired. http://paste.openstack.org/show/xSftqlzc76FSSxrOVLer/ [04:34] Ok, thanks. [04:36] Your welcome! [04:39] Looks like it did a little weird formatting when I pasted it but not bad [04:39] If you wait a bit, you can have it right back! :P [04:39] Yeah, indeed. [04:39] ok [04:39] did you get the template to work? [04:40] No, didn't try any further - might need a wiki admin like pleia2 for this. [04:40] maybe [04:41] The bug stats are off too. [04:42] the numbers? [04:44] Yes, critical number is a duplicate of open one. [04:45] And you forgot the translations. [04:49] Looks like you just didn't put the right number, but the right diff though. :P [04:50] I did not forget them, I looked at issue 520 and no translation were in that issue and I looked at the template that I saved to my computer and it did not mention it either so I had no idea what it is about, so I left it out on purpose [04:51] With it on my computer in font 12 it is so small I can barely see it so it is very hard not to miss something [04:52] Fair enough, I didn't mention its addition back specifically indeed. [04:52] what is it? [04:55] Great, 404 links in the LoCo Events section again. [04:56] I wonder why that is? [04:57] I did not have time check them [04:58] Not sure that I asked but I think I did, is there a way to have the script verify the links before it prints them to the terminal? [04:59] I honestly did not think about checking them as late as it is getting and the new medicine I just started I am a little bit drowsy [05:00] I think these are the only ones we have to specifically check though - the post ones we did while writing the summaries, and the update ones are pulled directly off the respective mailing list archive pages anyway. [05:01] Just the loco? If they are not working I will remove them I will not try to fix them [05:53] Wild_Man: http://paste.openstack.org/show/wt4id5hSZkA9kSilXv1i/ (diff), http://paste.openstack.org/show/gHmbmuQBhKRnfrKG7C8e/ (full) [05:53] It only took an hour!.. >_> [05:55] No simple copy and paste like I hoped it would be, was it because the formatting was messed up because of the copy and paste, If I missed it up that bad I do not need to be doing this [05:58] krytarik, I thought you were going to copy and paste to the wiki so it would be published when you were done? [06:00] Well, we are stuck there currently.. Unless we rename the template to something third in the meantime. But it's only gonna be published tomorrow evening anyway.. [06:01] I say just wait [06:01] Yep. Or try once again right now? :P [06:02] Was the one I posted bad because of me? how did you get the translation? I have to take care of the same trouble maker on the forum, it is posting everywhere and will not stop [06:03] And it looks worse there at first than it actually is - you have to look at the actual differences in the lines. And I'm merely posting this so you know for the next time. [06:04] "stats/translations.py bionic" [06:05] Thanks [06:15] krytarik, those formatting issues would not have happened if we had pasted it to the wiki directly correct? [06:16] They would. [06:16] After all, it's all just plain text mangling too. [06:22] I am getting off for the night, talk to you later [15:48] the translations stats don't take everything into account, so we pulled them ages ago [15:50] and it looks like the issue page was copied again instead of having the template used (only Canonical IS can delete wiki history from the filesystem, wiki admins cannot), I can share my screen via Hangout or something if someone wants me walk through how to use a template [16:00] pleia2: No, this time Wild_Man even managed to *rename* the template (he deleted it the last time, alongside with us copying it), and now we can't seem to rename it back. [16:01] oh dear, so IssueTemplate no longer exists? [16:01] Yeep. [16:02] ok, I have a work meeting now but I'll have a look after [16:02] Ok, thanks. :) [18:22] * Bashing-om is on - the gofer - What is the status and how now can I help ? [18:29] I'm going to need to submit an RT ticket to get our Issue Template back :( [18:30] pleia2: Ouch ! .. meaning we miss the monday release ? [18:31] probably, do you want to do a hangout or something later so I can show you how to use a template? [18:31] I'll submit the ticket now and follow up with the immediately, hopefully the urgency will help [18:33] pleia2: If you can take the time to teach; I can sure make the effort to learn . [18:45] Canonical IS is pretty busy with release-related things, but hopefully they can get to us today [18:45] (just spoke with them) [18:47] pleia2: A lot of stress in so many places . I too watch #ubuntu-release to get a guage . [18:47] * pleia2 nods [18:59] ok, our hero fo0bar has restored the IssueTemplate :) [19:00] Issue524 still has the gobs of history, but we'll just do a better job of using the template next week for 525 [19:00] but you may edit Issue524 now and move forward with the release [19:00] pleia2: looking :) [19:07] we are to edit " https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuWeeklyNewsletter/Issue524 " ?? Then I can start c/p from gdoc ?? [19:15] yes [19:16] pleia2: Thanks .. see what I can mess up then ... here goes nothing to push this along a bit . [19:47] Bashing-om: Actually it's all already ready in the paste I did in the morning - just have to copy-paste from "raw" there. [19:57] krytarik: :) .. I have made the paste .. with one issue in " Canonical News " I have not saved the pasting .. should I just cancel and back out at this time ? [19:59] Well, 1.) with just a minor issue, you can just save anyway and either of us can fix it afterwards, and 2.) you didn't even mention what that is. :) [20:03] krytarik: in Canonical News I have 2 lines not breaking to list the 4 items . [20:04] krytarik: Question, so ling as I am signed into the wiki, can others see the work in progress ? [20:04] so long* [20:04] Not until you saved it. [20:05] And I have a hard time imagining what you mean by that right now. :P [20:07] krytarik: I am at the point to save it .. a lot of anxiety that I may have made an error .... // Canonical News: the edit has the 4 seperate lines .. but the prevoew has 2 .. where the line returns in the edit mode do not register in the preview . [20:08] It's just plain text, dude! :D [20:08] No need to sweat it, just fix it afterwards. [20:09] I am here briefly but the new pain meds are killing me [20:09] krytarik: Yeah .. and I have gone back to the end of the lines .. made a hard line return, removed the resulting empty line; to no effect . [20:10] krytarik: Going to give one more look and save then what we have . [20:11] I mean you can always just repeat the copy-paste on just that section. [20:14] krytarik: Worth a try to re-copy/paste . Will advise. [20:16] krytarik: Nope: is this in "preview" https://insights.ubuntu.com/2018/04/16/botsandus-build-a-social-robot-on-ubuntu https://insights.ubuntu.com/2018/04/17/lxd-weekly-status-43 https://insights.ubuntu.com/2018/04/18/kubecon-cloudnativecon-europe-2018 https://insights.ubuntu.com/2018/04/18/eclipse-2018-survey-the-iot-landscape-what-it-empirically-looks-like [20:17] You mean it's just one line or something? [20:18] krytarik: Huh ?? ^^ the copy to irc is correct ,,but the wike "preview" is of 2 lines . [20:19] Just make sure the markup is correct. like: " * https://..." [20:20] krytarik: Jo kay .. I say again I do not know .. yall gor to push me .. let me see what I can do wuth the markup :) [20:22] krytarik: So, for the links .. I want to make each "https://lists.ubuntu.com ...." as " * https://lists.ubuntu.com ..." .. yes ? [20:26] The * should have been in front of all the links already when I pasted it last night that need the * [20:27] Bashing-om: ...Are you copying from the right paste?: http://paste.openstack.org/raw/gHmbmuQBhKRnfrKG7C8e/ [20:28] The ones that need them are the ones that we do bullet points for and do not write summaries for correct krytarik ? [20:28] krytarik: No .. I was not aware of an alternate original to copy from .. I am copying from gdoc / [20:31] krytarik: Presently I have all the summeries from gdoc copied .. and in the wiki all links require markup . [20:32] Wild_Man: Yes, the ones we write summaries for don't need the bullets, of course. [20:32] Bashing-om: Well, like I said, no need to start over, Wild_Man and I already did all the wiki page yesterday. [20:33] krytarik: I am comfortable myself to save the wiki - as the fixes seem to be trivial .. and have you look at it . [20:33] It should just be copy and paste then [20:33] Wild_Man: Wanna just continue where we left there? [20:33] Bashing-om: No, please do not. [20:34] krytarik: Wild_Man .. than I do need to cancel and sign out of the wiki ? And we start from scratch . [20:34] Yes please, not sure at all anymore what you got there currently. [20:35] krytarik, copy and paste from the link you posted you mean? if so I think Bashing-om should do it so he can see how easy it is since it is ready to go as is [20:35] Well, you two figure it out then. :) [20:35] Bashing-om, copy and paste from the last link krytarik posted [20:35] we will and if he wants me to I will do it [20:35] it is the template thing that hung me up [20:36] Wild_Man: krytarik I be the gofer .. lemme pull up krytarik's link and advise my next . [20:36] Bashing-om, okay [20:37] Btw, I'm almost done improving the LoCo events script currently - so no more dead links hopefully.. :P [20:37] that is excellent! I guess you have notice the forum has been down several hours? [20:38] Yep. [20:38] That might be a problem posting the newsletter! :P [20:38] Indeed [20:39] Wild_Man: Nope on the forum .. Single minded that I am - my focus is here ! [20:39] Also btw, since there are much less links in there this time, we could try again and post it at once. [20:39] Bashing-om, I understand that [20:40] krytarik, yes it is my guess that it will post now [20:41] Wild_Man: krytarik Going to cancel what I have on the wiki and start afresh c/p from your link . // re-think'n at this time . [20:41] Just copy to the proper section just like it is and if moin cooperates it should be perfect [20:42] Just copy the whole thing from the paste into the wiki editor. [20:42] Wild_Man: Do we have the time for me to fudge and flounder my way through .. or let experience rule ? I can always learn in the next issue . [20:44] krytarik: Wild_Man We have already lost 2 hours with my floundering efforts :( [20:44] Bashing-om, go ahead and give it a try [20:44] Up to you Bashing-om [20:46] Bashing-om, we are not pushed for time, it is still early [20:46] Wild_Man: Going for it .. going to cancel, sign out of the wiki .. and begin anew . Just accept that I have a steep learning curve .. and will exercise all the care I can . [20:46] Wild_Man: As we have the time ... smoke break for my nerves . [20:47] Bashing-om, okay! again just copy and paste to the proper section then preview it, but all should be good with just copy and paste [20:47] Bashing-om, if I smoked I would have taken one last night [20:50] Wild_Man: I continie in the midst of "controlled withdrawal" .. 6 hits and that is it ! [20:51] Bashing-om, that is restraint! [20:56] the forum is back up [21:28] Wild_Man: krytarik Pasting is done .. ready to save .. all I have to so now ls click on " save changes " ?? [21:31] Bashing-om, yes go ahead and click save if you preview it [21:32] Wild_Man: I did preview .. and here goes the save changes :) [21:32] great Bashing-om [21:33] Looking [21:33] Wild_Man: done ,, and signed out , have a looksee and see what . [21:37] Wild_Man: We do not have the 18.04 release party links in this week's issue . [21:37] Bashing-om, okay [21:37] I am reviewing it now [21:38] Wild_Man: :) I await next instruction . [21:39] Bashing-om, when we do the final copy to the wiki we remove all the directions that begin with # [21:39] It is looking pretty good [21:40] I will make a couple of edit for sure, do you want to remove all the #comments when I am done or do you want me too? [21:41] :) checking 3rd time that I have not missed anything . I have that feeling I need to look again . [21:42] ...You copied from the wrong one still. [21:42] Bashing-om, like where is says updates for 17.04 it is EOL [21:42] Wild_Man: removing comments is a gofer thing .. I can do that . [21:42] Otherwise there wouldn't be any comments anymore either. [21:44] krytarik: Yukkie .. is there more than one that you made up ? ..I just loaded the link that you had pointed me too (??) . [21:44] I had a better look we have two blogashperes [21:45] Wild_Man: I did cahnge 17.04 to 17.10 //lemme see what did not happen :( [21:45] While I appreciate the redundant hard labor of copying each section individually from the paste, please just copy the whole thing into there as I suggested initially. [21:46] Wild_Man: true .. tjere are fi[;ocations in the template .. I do not know how to remove these dupes in the template . [21:47] krytarik, do be clear you mean for him to delete the content from the wiki before he pastes into it correct? [21:47] Bashing-om, we are discussing, we will explain how that happened in a little while [21:50] Wild_Man: Long as we get published on-time .. it is all good :) [21:50] Well, personally I'd just to this: 1.) go to: http://paste.openstack.org/raw/gHmbmuQBhKRnfrKG7C8e/ , 2.) Ctrl+a, Ctrl+c, 3.) go to the wiki editor, 4.) in the edit area, Ctrl+a, Ctrl+v [21:51] Bashing-om, do you want me to copy and paste it? [21:52] Wild_Man: At this point .. would it not be faster to edit what we have ? [21:52] Bashing-om, no [21:53] Wild_Man: K. then please for you to pick up my errors and slack . [21:53] well do [21:56] krytarik, I made only little edit before I saved it, you can check it now [21:57] You mean diff against the paste? Sure. [21:58] It looks good. I removed an extra period in 17.10 before I saved it. [21:59] LOL, yeah only that. :D [22:00] Bashing-om, the link krytarik gave us was the completed version ready for the wiki so really we need not need a template, I removed all content that was in the wiki and did a complete copy and paste of the everything in the link [22:00] need/did [22:02] I used a copy of the template in libreoffice last night when I copied everything from gdoc to libreoffice and I removed all #comments but when I copied and pasted some formatting issues arouse that where not there in libreoffice and krytarik fixed those because I was past tired at that point [22:02] Bashing-om, ^^^ [22:04] Wild_Man: A quick lookm and it looks good ! krytarik had also corrected the kirean party links :) [22:05] Korean* [22:05] Bashing-om, if you copy directly to the wiki then you copy each section into its proper place, but leave out for example The Hub and paste starting with the summary title "Help test memory leaks fixes in 18.04 LTS" does that make sense? [22:06] that way you to not get two headings for each topic [22:06] to/do [22:07] Wild_Man: All that is left now to do --- is verify the links ? .. as to 2 headings .. the duplications are in the template .. as far as I cpuld tell . [22:07] Bashing-om, read the info I wrote above ^^^ that is for you knowledge [22:08] Bashing-om, no you copied the heading from gdoc, you do not need to copy the heading [22:08] just the summaries [22:08] brb === guiverc_d is now known as guiverc [22:12] Bashing-om, to be clear there is a heading for each section in the template and there is one in the gdoc, which may be worded a little different, you copied the header with the summaries into the wiki template and that created two headers for those sections [22:15] Bashing-om, this time the only thing you needed to do was delete all content from the wiki template and copy all content from the link krytarik posted, that will not usually be the case but this time it was ready to go because I broke the template last night and we completed it for publishing on our computers [22:15] krytarik, can it be published to the mailing list now? [22:16] Wild_Man: I get a chance to practice more next week :) [22:17] Wild_Man: Well, I first have to put it on the Fridge yet. [22:17] Wild_Man: krytarik Is there a need now to verify all links ? [22:17] Bashing-om, the only thing that i need to make sure is how to use the template without breaking it [22:17] Or in fact, can already start like the last time, of course. [22:17] okay [22:17] I can post to the forum? [22:18] Yep, that too. Do all the things! :P [22:19] Okay [22:24] krytarik, the files were created when I ran the publish script but I received this error File "/usr/lib/python2.7/codecs.py", line 494, in read [22:24] newchars, decodedbytes = self.decode(data, self.errors) [22:24] UnicodeDecodeError: 'utf8' codec can't decode byte 0xc3 in position 0: invalid continuation byte [22:24] is that important? [22:25] Heh, I get that here too now - but certainly didn't when I tested it last.. [22:26] That's the forums one btw. [22:27] Hold on for a sec. [22:27] Ok [22:29] Maybe do the mailing lists first then, while I finish the Fridge quickly. [22:29] ok [22:43] Bashing-om, thanks for attempting to publish to the wiki [22:44] Wild_Man: All in the process of learning .. Like I say .. I am in this for the long haul :) [22:46] Bashing-om, there is a lot to learn, I have some growing pains ahead of me [22:47] Wild_Man: In 2 years we will look back at now with fond memories :P [22:47] I think we should rename the headers in the gdoc to match the headers in the template exactly so there is no confusion, and put them in the exact same order as well [22:48] Indeed! [22:48] Wild_Man: +10 to updating the template . - for our use case - . [22:48] I hope to get the rest of the publishing done soon, it is a nice day I want to ride before dark [22:49] it is real close to the same but not quite [22:50] Bashing-om, I popped into the canonical IS channel and asked about the forum, he said let me check and bam the forum was back up, I do not think anyone was working on it, apache just needed a restart [22:51] Wild_Man: http://paste.openstack.org/raw/RfxBKP4FNvb5WuMBF2Kr/ [22:51] Location: Heber Springs, AR ~ Cond: 59°F (15°C), Haze ~ Atmo: 88%, 4.0 mi (6.4 km), 29.92 in (1013 mb) ~ Wind: 0 mph (0 km/h), N, N/A°F (N/A°C) ~ Time: 17:55 [22:51] Thanks krytarik, did the error change the putput of the file when it was create? [22:52] Bashing-om: Wrong channel, mate. :P [22:52] Wild_Man: I'm not sure what you mean, but this seems to be fine now. [22:53] Wild_Man: Did you do social media yet? [22:55] krytarik, not yet, it is next [22:56] krytarik, do we want this link at the top of the letter, it make no sense to me to have it there. http://ubuntuforums.org/forumdisplay.php?f=243 [22:56] the script is now putting that link at the top of the letter [22:56] Noo, because it's the subforum.. :P [22:57] I will remove it the post the letter [22:57] Yeah. [22:57] the/then [22:59] krytarik, Bashing-om it is looking good on the forum [23:00] \o/ [23:00] Wild_Man: I there in the forum .. Will see what we have :) [23:08] I did all my publishing [23:08] Wild_Man: Forum - UWN looks good .. We are live ! [23:09] Yes it really does [23:10] Wild_Man: Google+ done then too. [23:10] krytarik, If you do not need anything I am going to go for a ride [23:10] cool! [23:10] Yep, have fun! Thanks! [23:10] Your welcome! [23:22] Wild_Man: I'll do the wiki 'current' stuff now then. [23:44] looks like yesterday the newsletter account incorrectly said that Bionic is coming out next week [23:45] and the tweet for today said the newsletter is "there" instead of "here" ;) (this is why we've scripted the output, not so make mistakes) [23:46] anyway, I recommend that if the account is going to be doing tweets that aren't about the newsletter, that there is a plan, tweeting about Lubuntu testing and not other flavors looks like favoritism, and being sporatic about tweeting news is weird too [23:47] pleia2: Yuk ^^ My bad as I should heve caught them . Pressure ! [23:48] pleia2: "there" was actually the wording *I* have chosen to adapt the script to. But yes, I thought about the "next" thing too.. [23:49] this is why I only tweeted about the newsletter :) keep it simple, I have too much to do already without having to worry about also running a generic ubuntu news twitter feed [23:50] krytarik: ah, yeah, it's just not quite right English-wise :\ [23:52] Yeah, "there" is what came to my mind first, but I did think about later if "here" wasn't more appropriate in the context. [23:52] * pleia2 nods [23:54] And yeah, on the Lubuntu testing retweet, I didn't notice it like that before either.