[02:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rjava (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.9-9-1ubuntu1 => 0.9-9-1ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[02:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rjava [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.9-9-1ubuntu2]
[03:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: osgi-foundation-ee (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.2.0-3 => 4.2.0-4] (no packageset)
[03:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted osgi-foundation-ee [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.2.0-4]
[04:15] <slangasek> infinity, cyphermox: no fresh bug reports against shim-signed for 24h; that's promising.  I think we should push shim-signed 1.34.4.
[04:33] <slangasek> tsimonq2: hum, I don't love this collection of functions in the ubiquity code printing debugging errors about ecryptfs being deprecated, rather than the code being removed; but I see you're following suit with what was done to the GTK code
[04:34] <tsimonq2> slangasek: Yep.
[04:34] <wxl> sounds like slangasek has himself a bug report to file XD
[04:35] <slangasek> a complaint about the style of a project that I'm not a committer on is not really a bug report
[04:36] <tsimonq2> ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
[04:36] <wxl> that codebase is pretty much crazymaking as far as i'm concerned
[04:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity (bionic-proposed/main) [18.04.9 => 18.04.10] (core)
[05:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-raspi2 [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1009.10]
[05:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-19.20]
[05:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-19.20]
[05:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-meta-raspi2 [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0.1009.7]
[05:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-gcp [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1005.5]
[05:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-meta-gcp [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0.1005.7]
[05:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fpc (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.0.4+dfsg-16 => 3.0.4+dfsg-18] (no packageset) (sync)
[05:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: autopkgtest (bionic-proposed/main) [5.3ubuntu1 => 5.3.1] (core) (sync)
[05:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fpc [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.0.4+dfsg-18]
[05:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: autodep8 (bionic-proposed/main) [0.11.1 => 0.12] (core) (sync)
[05:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pandas (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.22.0-3 => 0.22.0-4] (no packageset) (sync)
[05:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-azure [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1008.8]
[05:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: deal.ii (bionic-proposed/universe) [8.5.1-1ubuntu1 => 8.5.1-3] (no packageset) (sync)
[05:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-azure [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1008.8]
[05:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-azure [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1008.8]
[05:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-azure [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1008.8]
[05:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-azure [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1008.8]
[05:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-azure [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1008.8]
[05:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-azure [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1008.8]
[05:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-azure [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1008.8]
[05:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-meta-azure [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0.1008.8]
[05:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-azure [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1008.8]
[05:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-meta-azure [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0.1008.8]
[05:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pandas [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.22.0-4]
[05:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-signed-azure [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1008.8]
[06:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-aws [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1006.6]
[06:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-meta-aws [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0.1006.6]
[06:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-kvm [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1007.7]
[06:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-meta-kvm [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0.1007.7]
[06:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: jmol (bionic-proposed/universe) [14.6.4+2016.11.05+dfsg1-3 => 14.6.4+2016.11.05+dfsg1-3.1] (no packageset) (sync)
[06:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted jmol [sync] (bionic-proposed) [14.6.4+2016.11.05+dfsg1-3.1]
[06:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-390 [source] (bionic-proposed) [390.48-0ubuntu3]
[06:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mpdecimal (bionic-proposed/main) [2.4.2-1 => 2.4.2-1ubuntu1] (core)
[06:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mpdecimal [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.2-1ubuntu1]
[06:47] <acheronuk> nvidia-prime in the queue? adds back the 'prime-switch' script, but with it not installed? '+#prime-switch /sbin'
[06:48] <acheronuk> I wonder if that is intended?
[06:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: creduce (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.8.0~20180315-1 => 2.8.0~20180422-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[06:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nvidia-graphics-drivers-390 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/restricted) [390.48-0ubuntu3] (ubuntu-desktop)
[06:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nvidia-graphics-drivers-390 [i386] (bionic-proposed/restricted) [390.48-0ubuntu3] (ubuntu-desktop)
[06:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted creduce [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.8.0~20180422-1]
[06:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nvidia-graphics-drivers-390 [armhf] (bionic-proposed/restricted) [390.48-0ubuntu3] (ubuntu-desktop)
[06:55] <acheronuk> our sddm has a pacth to use prime-switch: https://git.launchpad.net/~kubuntu-packagers/kubuntu-packaging/+git/sddm/tree/debian/patches/06_nvidia_prime_setup.diff?h=kubuntu_bionic_archive
[06:57] <ginggs> acheronuk: try asking tseliot in #-devel
[06:58] <acheronuk> ginggs: he's not in there, or I would have
[06:58] <ginggs> acheronuk: ya, just saw that, sorry.  he's normally around there
[07:03] <slangasek> infinity: LP: #1761630 is awaiting an ack/nack of the late landing of the new upstream rsyslog
[07:03] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 1761630 in rsyslog (Ubuntu Bionic) "journald takes over /dev/log in bionic, impacts usability of syslog querying" [Critical,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1761630
[07:03] <acheronuk> ginggs: thanks. hopefully he'll turn up in a bit
[07:06] <ginggs> acheronuk: I pinged tseliot by email
[07:08] <acheronuk> thank you
[07:34] <infinity> slangasek: I'm okay with it if the people doing it are 99% sure it's going to be an improvement over the current state.
[07:34] <infinity> xnox: ^
[07:35] <infinity> xnox: Also, are you coming in today, or remote?
[07:35]  * infinity bets his question will be answered in person in ~25m.
[07:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubiquity [source] (bionic-proposed) [18.04.10]
[07:56] <acheronuk> ^^^ may I ask why that was rejected?
[07:57] <tseliot> acheronuk: hi, the prime-switch tool won't do much, since a reboot is required now. I  left the file there just in case things change in the future.
[07:58] <acheronuk> tseliot: ok. that is fair enough. sddm only executes it if it there anyway.
[07:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-390 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [390.48-0ubuntu3]
[07:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-390 [i386] (bionic-proposed) [390.48-0ubuntu3]
[07:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-390 [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [390.48-0ubuntu3]
[08:01] <acheronuk> or how it seems anyway. I must admit I have not looked at prime interaction much
[08:01] <apw> acheronuk, because it had a load of junk in it by the looks of the diff
[08:02] <acheronuk> apw: I should be more direct with questions. i.e. was it any of the KDE front end change?
[08:02] <acheronuk> thanks
[08:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted autodep8 [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.12]
[08:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lensfun [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.3.2-4]
[08:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted autopkgtest [sync] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.1]
[08:07] <apw> acheronuk, not sure i can tell if there were any kde frontend changes in there
[08:08] <acheronuk> apw: yeah. just looked at the diff, and the KDE change is at the end. no surprise if you don't get to that
[08:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted candid [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.0~alpha+201804191824-24b36a9-0ubuntu1]
[08:09] <cjwatson> apw: It had a translation update from me, which is most of it
[08:09] <cjwatson> Oh, but then indeed some other junk
[08:09] <apw> cjwatson, and a large chunk of an apt-cache, which i assume is why it got rejected :)
[08:09] <cjwatson> Somebody didn't clean
[08:10] <cjwatson> Lemme do that merge as requested by Steve in the MP and I'll reupload
[08:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: candid [amd64] (bionic-proposed/none) [1.0.0~alpha+201804191824-24b36a9-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[08:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: candid [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/none) [1.0.0~alpha+201804191824-24b36a9-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[08:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: candid [i386] (bionic-proposed/none) [1.0.0~alpha+201804191824-24b36a9-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[08:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: candid [s390x] (bionic-proposed/none) [1.0.0~alpha+201804191824-24b36a9-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[08:14] <infinity> cjwatson: I was already on the ubiquity thing.
[08:14] <infinity> cjwatson: But I guess I can compare mine to yours. :P
[08:14] <cjwatson> infinity: Oh, go for it then
[08:14] <cjwatson> infinity: Shall I finish the merge though?
[08:14] <infinity> cjwatson: If you want to commit the merge, go for it.
[08:15] <infinity> cjwatson: Then I'll compare to the upload I "fixed" here for Steve.
[08:15] <infinity> (WHich has a proper clean, a non-bodged update to localechooser...)
[08:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: candid [arm64] (bionic-proposed/none) [1.0.0~alpha+201804191824-24b36a9-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[08:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: candid [armhf] (bionic-proposed/none) [1.0.0~alpha+201804191824-24b36a9-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[08:17] <cjwatson> infinity: merged - I left the changelog as UNRELEASED, feel free to sync that up
[08:17] <infinity> cjwatson: Yup.
[08:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libxshmfence (bionic-proposed/main) [1.2-1 => 1.3-1] (core) (sync)
[08:22] <jibel> infinity, I've another fix coming for ubiquity
[08:22] <jibel> for bug 1765651
[08:22] <ubot5`> bug 1765651 in ubiquity (Ubuntu Bionic) "Do not run gnome-initial-setup during OEM preparation stage" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1765651
[08:22] <infinity> jibel: Oh, fun.  Then I won't finalize and upload this just yet.
[08:23] <jibel> and then another one for bug 1741690 once we understand what's wrong and how to fix it
[08:23] <ubot5`> bug 1741690 in ubiquity (Ubuntu Bionic) "You can't enable the Orca screen reader until after you click "Try Ubuntu" on Ubuntu bionic" [Critical,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1741690
[08:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted candid [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.0~alpha+201804191824-24b36a9-0ubuntu1]
[08:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted candid [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.0~alpha+201804191824-24b36a9-0ubuntu1]
[08:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted candid [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.0~alpha+201804191824-24b36a9-0ubuntu1]
[08:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted candid [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.0~alpha+201804191824-24b36a9-0ubuntu1]
[08:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted candid [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.0~alpha+201804191824-24b36a9-0ubuntu1]
[08:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted candid [i386] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.0~alpha+201804191824-24b36a9-0ubuntu1]
[08:27] <infinity> jibel: Doesn't entirely sound like anyone has a fix for the first one either?
[08:30] <jibel> infinity, I'm testing a fix for the first one
[08:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1008.8] (kernel)
[08:48] <infinity> jibel: Mmkay.
[08:48] <tseliot> apw: hey, can you approve nvidia-prime too, please?
[08:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: jedit (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.4.0+dfsg-3 => 5.5.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[08:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1008.8]
[08:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted jedit [sync] (bionic-proposed) [5.5.0+dfsg-1]
[08:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: javassist (bionic-proposed/universe) [1:3.21.0-1 => 1:3.21.0-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[08:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted javassist [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1:3.21.0-2]
[09:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: usbguard (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.7.0+ds1-2build1 => 0.7.2+ds-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[09:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted usbguard [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.7.2+ds-1]
[09:13] <sil2100> cpaelzer: hey! You removed the tomcat task from tasksel some month ago, but on the ISO tracker there's still a server test case for the tomcat server installation
[09:15] <jibel> infinity, https://code.launchpad.net/~jibel/ubiquity/lp1765651_OEM_touch_gnome-initial-setup_flag/+merge/343793 ready for review
[09:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mate-panel (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.20.1-0ubuntu1 => 1.20.1-2ubuntu1] (ubuntu-mate)
[09:18] <sil2100> cpaelzer: I guess the test-case is no longer valid as tomcat8 is not seeded and in universe, right? Should we remove the test-case?
[09:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: speech-dispatcher (bionic-proposed/main) [0.8.8-1 => 0.8.8-1ubuntu1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[09:28] <infinity> jibel: Is that tested?
[09:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libabw (bionic-proposed/main) [0.1.1-4ubuntu1 => 0.1.2-1ubuntu1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[09:33] <acheronuk> tseliot: I'm hoping the nvidia-prime in the queue might help fix LP #1762885 but I can't test :/
[09:33] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 1762885 in sddm (Ubuntu) "SDDM starts to black screen on hybrid laptops withe modern NVidia cards" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1762885
[09:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected base-files [source] (bionic-proposed) [10.1ubuntu2]
[09:34] <apw> ^ so we don't accept it prematurely ...
[09:35] <doko> apw: hmm, what would be the right time?
[09:35] <apw> doko, normally just before we start making the finals, just what we always do
[09:36] <apw> we'll just accept it from rejected when we are ready
[09:37] <apw> this is release week, we do wierd things, its normal
[09:40] <xnox> 🌈
[09:40]  * apw boggles, there is a rainbow _character_ now ?
[09:40] <xnox> apw, install "gnome-characters" deb app; then enable it as a search provider
[09:41] <xnox> and then in gnome-search after pressing super you can type to search these emoji
[09:41] <apw> i can just cut-n-paste it now you typed one ... i think i am more supprised my irc client is utf-8 clean enough to display it
[09:41] <xnox> really useful
[09:41] <xnox> if you enable it as a search provider
[09:41] <apw> there had better be a right hand side :)
[09:42] <cpaelzer> sil2100: sorry for the delay, was in a call
[09:42] <cpaelzer> reading backlog
[09:43] <cpaelzer> sil2100: yes I think just nobody thought on the test when doing the modifications
[09:43] <sil2100> cpaelzer: ok, should I remove the testcase then?
[09:43] <xnox> 💩
[09:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: google-perftools (bionic-proposed/main) [2.5-2.2ubuntu1 => 2.5-2.2ubuntu2] (ubuntu-server)
[09:44] <cpaelzer> sil2100: IMHO yes, I just now go to the tracker and want to take a look before saying yes
[09:45] <cpaelzer> sil2100: ok yeah it is just the install with this task test - yes this should be removed
[09:45] <cpaelzer> and it is on 4/5 architectures (all but arm)
[09:45] <cpaelzer> how is this edited actually?
[09:45] <xnox> 👍
[09:46] <cpaelzer> xnox: are these unicode experiments?
[09:46] <xnox> yes
[09:46] <xnox> i think gnome-characters should be installed by default
[09:48] <doko> slangasek, infinity: please have a look at the libdbi-drivers ftbfs, fails with your freetds update
[09:50] <xnox> infinity, https://github.com/CanonicalLtd/subiquity/pull/319
[09:50] <ubot5-ng> CanonicalLtd bug (Pull request) 319 in subiquity "Offline MAAS installer" (comments: 1) [Open]
[10:00] <tseliot> acheronuk: that looks like a duplicate of LP: #1764005, which affects lightdm. I assume they are the same, since they rely on the same scripts
[10:00] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 1764005 in nvidia-prime (Ubuntu) "Black-screen on boot with nvidia 390 for Budgie, MATE, Xubuntu, Kubuntu" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1764005
[10:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qemu (xenial-proposed/main) [1:2.5+dfsg-5ubuntu10.25 => 1:2.5+dfsg-5ubuntu10.26] (ubuntu-server, virt)
[10:17] <acheronuk> tseliot: seemed likely to me, which is why I was hoping that prime upload would fix
[10:32] <sil2100> cpaelzer: ok, disabled the test-case, thanks for confirming
[10:44] <jibel> infinity, yes tested in OEM and non OEM installations
[10:45] <infinity> jibel: Excellent.
[10:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: candid (bionic-proposed/none) [none => 1.0.0~alpha+201804191824-24b36a9-0ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[10:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-tx-tftp (bionic-proposed/main) [0.1~bzr47-0ubuntu1 => 0.1~bzr47-0ubuntu2] (ubuntu-server)
[11:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity (bionic-proposed/main) [18.04.9 => 18.04.10] (core)
[11:14] <cjwatson> infinity: reminder that you were going to update bionic chroots
[11:17] <infinity> cjwatson: Reminder noted.
[11:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted candid [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.0~alpha+201804191824-24b36a9-0ubuntu2]
[11:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron [source] (artful-proposed) [2:11.0.3-0ubuntu2]
[11:25] <jibel> could someone have a look at bug 1765724 ?
[11:25] <ubot5`> bug 1765724 in cryptsetup (Ubuntu) "Xenial -> Bionic - System fails to boot after upgrade - <email address hidden> fails to start" [Critical,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1765724
[11:29] <xnox> jibel, so i have been working on that.
[11:29] <xnox> jibel, and failed to reproduce it.
[11:30] <xnox> jibel, i've used 16.04.4 install media and did two installs and upgrades. The first one i did was "full disk encrypt + upgrade" => result was fully non-degraded system.
[11:30] <xnox> jibel, then i re-read the bug ;-)
[11:31] <xnox> jibel, and did the "/home encyprted + upgrade" again, i had fully booted system.
[11:32] <jibel> xnox, I tried again last friday. Let me try again
[11:32] <jibel> I tried and reproduced it.
[11:33] <xnox> jibel, so, how to reproduce this?
[11:37] <doko> openjdk-9 removed
[11:37] <tsimonq2> (ecryptfs is no longer installed by default so encrypted /home doesn't work.)
[11:37] <jibel> xnox, 16.04.4 + encrypted home + update then upgrade. The upgraded system hangs on boot when it tries to activate the crypted swap
[11:37] <jibel> tsimonq2, it shouldn't affect upgrades
[11:38] <infinity> jibel: Did the upgrade remove it?
[11:38] <tsimonq2> Exactly my thought.
[11:38] <xnox> jibel, e.g. did you do just encrypt home? lvm + encrypt home? full disk encrypt + encrypt home? was it a clean target disk install? or was there something on the disk?
[11:38] <jibel> infinity, no
[11:38] <jibel> xnox, yes just encrypted home
[11:38] <jibel> no lvm at all
[11:38] <jibel> and a clean disk
[11:39] <jibel> xnox, I'm redoing the full test
[11:39] <xnox> thanks.
[11:40] <xnox> jibel, and i wonder if it matters which xenial iso used.... are you using 16.04.0 iso per chance? i used 16.04.4..... i wonder if we "fixed" things since .0
[11:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubiquity [source] (bionic-proposed) [18.04.10]
[11:40] <xnox> bah
[11:40] <xnox> i can't read =) you did say 16.04.4
[11:52] <jibel> xnox, there is this warning during the upgrade
[11:52] <jibel> Installing new version of config file /etc/init.d/cryptdisks-early ...
[11:52] <jibel> WARNING: you need to set all of cipher, hash and size for the plain dm-crypt mapping cryptswap1 in /etc/crypttab.
[12:03] <cjwatson> infinity: hmm, new chroots not super-happy with life
[12:04] <cjwatson> ah, may be a buildd-manager/keyserver problem
[12:14] <cjwatson> infinity: (disregard, not your problem)
[12:19] <xnox> jibel, ok. does it boot?
[12:19] <xnox> i also wonder if it is racy or not....
[12:19] <xnox> Cause it failed with dependency....
[12:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: cider (bionic-proposed/primary) [0.16.0+dfsg-2build1]
[12:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cider [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.16.0+dfsg-2build1]
[12:26] <jibel> xnox, the same machine that was hanging repeatedly on Friday boots now
[12:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cider [amd64] (bionic-proposed/none) [0.16.0+dfsg-2build1] (no packageset)
[12:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cider [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [0.16.0+dfsg-2build1]
[12:28] <xnox> jibel, it might be racy, and was loosing race, if e.g. hypervisor was "slower" on friday =/
[12:28] <xnox> jibel, i do hope that the orderings for these things are reliable / stable enough.
[12:33] <coreycb> xnox: is it ok if i add openstack release notes to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BionicBeaver/ReleaseNotes?
[12:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: modemmanager (bionic-proposed/main) [1.6.8-2 => 1.6.8-2ubuntu1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[12:43] <xnox> coreycb, yes
[12:43] <coreycb> xnox: ok thanks
[12:52] <rbalint> xnox: systemd is blocked from migration by a single autopkgtest which passed with systemd/237-3ubuntu9 but which includes the boot of a kvm instance
[12:53] <rbalint> infinity: ^ could it let to migrate?
[12:53] <xnox> rbalint, thanks, but it is known that open-iscsi tests are racy on boot.
[12:53] <xnox> rbalint, we are aware of it, and are working on migrating it.... here in person at bluefin.
[12:53] <rbalint> xnox: cool, thanks
[12:58] <ahasenack> xnox: is that the one with the 10s timeout change/fix?
[12:59] <xnox> ahasenack, yes.... there is also a silo for testing that change alone
[12:59] <xnox> ahasenack, have you tried it?
[12:59] <ahasenack> no, I haven't, but looking forward to it
[12:59] <ahasenack> can I just get the deb from lp? I can try it on a laptop which takes 10s longer to boot because of that
[13:00] <xnox> ahasenack, see the silo linked from the bug report
[13:00] <xnox> ahasenack, or install from proposed
[13:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected zfs-linux [source] (artful-proposed) [0.6.5.11-1ubuntu3.4]
[13:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libdbi-drivers (bionic-proposed/main) [0.9.0-5ubuntu1 => 0.9.0-5ubuntu2] (core)
[13:09] <LocutusOfBorg> slangasek, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virtualbox/+bug/1766215
[13:09] <ubot5`> Ubuntu bug 1766215 in virtualbox (Ubuntu) "package virtualbox-dkms 5.2.10-dfsg-2 failed to install/upgrade: installed virtualbox-dkms package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1" [Undecided,New]
[13:09] <LocutusOfBorg> was this what you were referring to when said "no new reports wrt shim?"
[13:10] <LocutusOfBorg>  At main.c:281:
[13:10] <LocutusOfBorg> - SSL error:02001002:system library:fopen:No such file or directory: ../crypto/bio/bss_file.c:74
[13:10] <LocutusOfBorg> - SSL error:2006D080:BIO routines:BIO_new_file:no such file: ../crypto/bio/bss_file.c:81
[13:10] <LocutusOfBorg> kmodsign: /var/lib/dkms/virtualbox/5.2.10/4.15.0-15-generic/x86_64/module/virtualbox.ko: No such file or directory
[13:10] <LocutusOfBorg> seems something broke dkms badly
[13:12] <jibel> xnox, I reproduced the problem. the VM fails to boot after an upgrade from xenial
[13:12] <xnox> jibel, can I have a tar ball of /var/log from said machine?
[13:12] <xnox> jibel, that would have the installs logs, and the boot journal.
[13:13] <jibel> xnox, sure
[13:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: activemq-activeio (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.1.4-2 => 3.1.4-3] (no packageset) (sync)
[13:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted activemq-activeio [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.1.4-3]
[13:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: statcvs (bionic-proposed/universe) [1:0.7.0.dfsg-6 => 1:0.7.0.dfsg-7] (no packageset) (sync)
[13:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted statcvs [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1:0.7.0.dfsg-7]
[13:20] <jibel> xnox, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cryptsetup/+bug/1765724/+attachment/5125848/+files/var_log.tgz
[13:20] <ubot5`> Ubuntu bug 1765724 in cryptsetup (Ubuntu) "Xenial -> Bionic - System fails to boot after upgrade - <email address hidden> fails to start" [Critical,New]
[13:22] <jibel> xnox, failed boot is -1, last boot is to recovery with swap disabled
[13:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: twisted (bionic-proposed/main) [17.9.0-1 => 17.9.0-2] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) (sync)
[13:35] <xnox> jibel, could you boot; enable swap; run $ systemctl daemon-reload; and give a tar ball of /run and /etc ?
[13:35] <xnox> jibel, cause it's erroring out on dependency ordering... awaiting for drive.... As if the drive changes uuid?
[13:36] <xnox> jibel, it would be alos nice to get the output of $ sudo blkid ?
[13:40] <jibel> xnox, by enable swap you mean just removing the comment in fstab or starting it?
[13:40] <xnox> jibel, just remove the comment.
[13:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libdbi-drivers [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.9.0-5ubuntu2]
[13:40] <xnox> jibel, daemon-reload should rerun systemd generators, which create these units in /run
[13:40] <jibel> okay
[13:40] <xnox> jibel, which fail to start in the right order for you.
[13:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected simplestreams [source] (artful-proposed) [0.1.0~bzr450-0ubuntu1.1]
[13:44] <jibel> xnox, attached to the bug report
[13:45] <xnox> doko, why did you force sync rails -1, on top of 0ubuntu4? and dropping the ubuntu changes? and not asking the TIL to look at it?
[13:53] <xnox> jibel, cool, checking.
[14:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debian-installer (bionic-proposed/main) [20101020ubuntu538 => 20101020ubuntu539] (core)
[14:05] <xnox> jibel, yeah, the race looks legit.
[14:06] <tjaalton> doko: bah, tomcat update broke dogtag, again..
[14:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected debian-installer [source] (bionic-proposed) [20101020ubuntu539]
[14:15] <xnox> jibel, it's a race. it may require fixes in systemd unit generator; if i have a proposed solution, i may ask you to add a snippet in /etc to see if that reliably fixes the boot for you and makes it race-free.
[14:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libqmi (bionic-proposed/main) [1.18.0-3 => 1.18.0-3ubuntu1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[14:15] <xnox> jibel, and with an extra snippet, you'd then need to reboot enough to confirm. E.g. if you think that it happens every 3 boot; to like reboot 20 times, to hopefully for systems to always come up fine.
[14:16] <xnox> jibel, i also think we should not make it required.... and instead opportunistically bring it up. and e.g. boot degraded if it is not there.
[14:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted makedumpfile [source] (artful-proposed) [1:1.6.1-2ubuntu0.2]
[14:20] <tjaalton> doko: seems to be due to tomcat built with newer jdk now
[14:22] <jibel> xnox, okay, let me know when you have something
[14:26] <xnox> jibel, so, i think this is not a regression per-se, because if we would have kept the encrypt-/home with ecryptfs, things would be racy today too.
[14:26] <xnox> jibel, so newly installed systems are not affected, thus this is not a blocker for release, despite nice to have for the release.
[14:27] <xnox> jibel, it can be SRU thing to fix.
[14:27] <jibel> xnox, an SRU sounds fine.
[14:30] <jbicha> xnox: gnome-characters is installed by default but as a snap so the GNOME Shell search provider doesn't work yet https://forum.snapcraft.io/t/gnome-shell-search-providers/4322
[14:31] <jbicha> also: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-characters/issues/11
[14:31] <ubot5-ng> GNOME bug 11 in gnome-characters "Search provider should be enabled by default" (comments: 2) [Bugzilla, Opened]
[14:31] <ubot5`> Error: Gnome bug 11 could not be found
[14:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted makedumpfile [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.5.9-5ubuntu0.7]
[14:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-hwe (bionic-proposed/multiverse) [5.2.10-dfsg-2ubuntu18.04.1 => 5.2.10-dfsg-3ubuntu18.04.1] (no packageset)
[14:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox-hwe [source] (bionic-proposed) [5.2.10-dfsg-3ubuntu18.04.1]
[14:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kexec-tools [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:2.0.10-1ubuntu2.5]
[14:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debian-installer (bionic-proposed/main) [20101020ubuntu538 => 20101020ubuntu539] (core)
[14:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted debian-installer [source] (bionic-proposed) [20101020ubuntu539]
[14:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-hwe (bionic-proposed/multiverse) [5.2.10-dfsg-2ubuntu18.04.1 => 5.2.10-dfsg-4ubuntu18.04.1] (no packageset)
[14:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox-hwe [source] (bionic-proposed) [5.2.10-dfsg-4ubuntu18.04.1]
[15:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mate-panel [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.20.1-2ubuntu1]
[15:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected libqmi [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.18.0-3ubuntu1]
[15:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted simplestreams [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.1.0~bzr426-0ubuntu1.3]
[15:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libabw [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.1.2-1ubuntu1]
[15:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted speech-dispatcher [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.8.8-1ubuntu1]
[15:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: librtcom-telepathy-glib (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.1.38~git.1.e4dae27b-0ubuntu3 => 0.1.38~git.1.e4dae27b-0ubuntu4] (no packageset)
[15:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted librtcom-telepathy-glib [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.1.38~git.1.e4dae27b-0ubuntu4]
[15:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected google-perftools [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.5-2.2ubuntu2]
[15:13] <doko> why are the ftbfs fixes rejected?
[15:14] <doko> no reject messages yet
[15:15] <doko> tjaalton: yes, it's openjdk-10 now, and it will be 11 in November
[15:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected python-tx-tftp [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.1~bzr47-0ubuntu2]
[15:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mate-notification-daemon (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.20.0-0ubuntu1 => 1.20.0-2] (ubuntu-mate) (sync)
[15:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libxshmfence [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.3-1]
[15:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted twisted [sync] (bionic-proposed) [17.9.0-2]
[15:20] <infinity> doko: Read your email?
[15:20] <doko> infinity: read above message?
[15:20] <doko> no reject message yet
[15:22] <infinity> doko: The rejects are pretty fire and forget for me.  But one of them was missing the patch you referenced in patches/series, and the other one wasn't cleaned before the source package was built.
[15:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mate-notification-daemon [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.20.0-2]
[15:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: google-perftools (bionic-proposed/main) [2.5-2.2ubuntu1 => 2.5-2.2ubuntu2] (ubuntu-server)
[15:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mate-common (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.20.0-0ubuntu1 => 1.20.0-1] (ubuntu-mate) (sync)
[15:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wine-development (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.5-1 => 3.6-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[15:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wine-development [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.6-1]
[15:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mate-user-guide (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.20.0-0ubuntu1 => 1.20.0-1] (ubuntu-mate, ubuntukylin) (sync)
[15:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ros-metapackages (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.9 => 1.10] (no packageset) (sync)
[15:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ros-metapackages [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.10]
[15:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ros-geometry2 (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.5.16-3 => 0.5.16-4] (no packageset) (sync)
[15:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ros-geometry2 [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.5.16-4]
[15:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openvpn-systemd-resolved (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.2.6-1 => 1.2.7-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[15:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openvpn-systemd-resolved [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.7-1]
[15:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libmateweather (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.20.0-0ubuntu1 => 1.20.0-1] (ubuntu-mate) (sync)
[15:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-easydev (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.9.35+dfsg-1 => 0.9.35+dfsg-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[15:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-easydev [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.9.35+dfsg-2]
[15:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected modemmanager [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.6.8-2ubuntu1]
[15:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-tx-tftp (bionic-proposed/main) [0.1~bzr47-0ubuntu1 => 0.1~bzr47-0ubuntu2] (ubuntu-server)
[15:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.408.29]
[15:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-tx-tftp [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.1~bzr47-0ubuntu2]
[15:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted google-perftools [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.5-2.2ubuntu2]
[15:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libmateweather [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.20.0-1]
[15:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mate-user-guide [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.20.0-1]
[15:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mate-common [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.20.0-1]
[15:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mate-icon-theme (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.20.0-0ubuntu1 => 1.20.0-1] (ubuntu-mate) (sync)
[15:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: marco (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.20.1-0ubuntu1 => 1.20.1-1] (ubuntu-mate) (sync)
[15:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mate-session-manager (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.20.0-0ubuntu1 => 1.20.0-1] (ubuntu-mate) (sync)
[15:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mate-control-center (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.20.2-0ubuntu1 => 1.20.2-1] (ubuntu-mate) (sync)
[15:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mate-screensaver (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.20.0-0ubuntu1 => 1.20.0-1] (ubuntu-mate) (sync)
[15:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted marco [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.20.1-1]
[15:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mate-icon-theme [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.20.0-1]
[15:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mate-session-manager [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.20.0-1]
[15:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mate-control-center [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.20.2-1]
[15:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mate-screensaver [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.20.0-1]
[15:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mate-media (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.20.0-0ubuntu1 => 1.20.0-1] (ubuntu-mate) (sync)
[15:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mate-system-monitor (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.20.0-0ubuntu1 => 1.20.0-1] (ubuntu-mate, ubuntukylin) (sync)
[16:00] <slangasek> cjwatson, infinity: didn't clean> oops
[16:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: caja-extensions (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.20.0-0ubuntu1 => 1.20.0-1] (ubuntu-mate) (sync)
[16:01] <slangasek> infinity: d-i not uploaded yet for 4.15.0-19.20 ? should I?
[16:01] <infinity> slangasek: Look harder?
[16:02] <infinity> slangasek: Except it's FTBFS on ppc64el.  Grr.
[16:02]  * infinity looks.
[16:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: engrampa (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.20.0-0ubuntu1 => 1.20.0-1] (ubuntu-mate, ubuntukylin, xubuntu) (sync)
[16:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: eom (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.20.0-0ubuntu1 => 1.20.0-1] (ubuntu-mate, ubuntukylin) (sync)
[16:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected zfs-linux [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.6.5.6-0ubuntu21]
[16:04] <slangasek> LocutusOfBorg: LP: #1766215> ah. thanks, I missed that the dkms maintscript code didn't get fixed for this.
[16:04] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 1766215 in virtualbox (Ubuntu) "package virtualbox-dkms 5.2.10-dfsg-2 failed to install/upgrade: installed virtualbox-dkms package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1" [Critical,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1766215
[16:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mate-applets (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.20.1-2ubuntu1 => 1.20.1-3] (ubuntu-mate) (sync)
[16:04] <slangasek> infinity: ah, I was looking at rmadison, ok
[16:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mate-calc (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.20.1-0ubuntu1 => 1.20.1-1] (ubuntu-mate, ubuntukylin, xubuntu) (sync)
[16:05] <slangasek> infinity: (which is an hour out of date, phooey)
[16:05] <slangasek> infinity: anyway, now urgently fixing dkms :/
[16:06] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks slangasek! sorry if I didn't tell you earlier, I was really AFK
[16:07] <LocutusOfBorg> I hope you can fix this :)
[16:07] <doko> crap, google-perftools still ftbfs on ppc64el
[16:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mate-indicator-applet (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.20.0-0ubuntu1 => 1.20.0-1] (ubuntu-mate) (sync)
[16:09] <infinity> checking how to access the program counter from a struct ucontext... configure: WARNING: Could not find the PC.  Will not try to compile libprofiler...
[16:09] <infinity> doko: ^-- Due to that, it looks like.
[16:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mate-netbook (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.20.0-0ubuntu1 => 1.20.0-1] (ubuntu-mate) (sync)
[16:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mate-sensors-applet (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.20.1-0ubuntu1 => 1.20.1-3] (ubuntu-mate) (sync)
[16:11] <slangasek> LocutusOfBorg: that bug report was filed 4h ago; did you have reports sooner than that?  Sorry, I failed to look at the dkms-providing packages for bug reports before committing
[16:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mate-user-share (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.20.0-0ubuntu1 => 1.20.0-1] (ubuntu-mate) (sync)
[16:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dkms (bionic-proposed/main) [2.3-3ubuntu7 => 2.3-3ubuntu8] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[16:13] <slangasek> infinity: ^^ dkms in the queue, please review.  should look familiar from shim-signed, except I'm intentionally not guarding for the "zero .kos" case because this is code inside dkms itself and that would be a different sort of bug
[16:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-caja (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.20.0-0ubuntu1 => 1.20.0-1] (ubuntu-mate) (sync)
[16:16] <sil2100> New language packs being uploaded, will mass-approve once the upload stage is done
[16:16] <infinity> slangasek: So, I'm not sure if we actually ship anything that would have such an issue, but would it not be potentially valid for a DKMS module to build a complex set of modules in subdirs?
[16:16] <infinity> slangasek: ie: would find maybe be more appropriate than the glob?
[16:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: netplan.io (bionic-proposed/main) [0.35 => 0.36] (core)
[16:17] <slangasek> sil2100: why another language pack run?  didn't we just have one at the end of last week?
[16:18] <slangasek> infinity: you and your thorough reviews.  I think you're correct; otoh the code in shim is also currently broken in the same way in that case.  Do you want to accept this to unbreak the current failing-to-install maintainer scripts, and then I'll look at cleaning up both?
[16:19] <sil2100> slangasek: the language-packs we generated (and exported) last week didn't have gnome-initial-setup translated for most languages due to it landing lateish, there was a translation-rush during the weekend to get that fixed
[16:19] <slangasek> ah
[16:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libmatemixer (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.20.0-0ubuntu1 => 1.20.0-1] (ubuntu-mate, ubuntukylin) (sync)
[16:19] <slangasek> icky, but ok
[16:19] <sil2100> slangasek: since it's one of the first things a user sees we found it important to respin ;/
[16:20] <slangasek> sil2100: technically since it doesn't happen until after reboot, if they use the default of downloading updates during install, it would still be translated if we pushed these langpacks to -updates, AIUI
[16:21] <slangasek> sil2100: (i.e. I think the langpacks shouldn't be allowed to delay the spinning of RCs, if everything else is ready to go before that... which it may not be)
[16:21] <infinity> slangasek: Yeah.  I'm also less sure than you based on limited context that the empty test isn't useful here (and it certainly wouldn't be harmful), so I'd be okay with the code mirroring shim exactly.
[16:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mate-polkit (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.20.0-0ubuntu1 => 1.20.0-1] (ubuntu-mate, ubuntukylin) (sync)
[16:22] <infinity> slangasek: I specifically told sil2100 that the langpacks can not (and will not) be a blocker, but if he can get them in before the other things I'm blocking on, that's fine.
[16:22] <slangasek> infinity: ok then we're on the same page, good-o
[16:22] <infinity> slangasek: He misspoke with "important to respin". :P
[16:22] <doko> infinity: the debian version builds without any patches ... https://launchpad.net/~doko/+archive/ubuntu/toolchain/+sourcepub/9007034/+listing-archive-extra
[16:23] <slangasek> infinity: I'm arguing that the empty test isn't useful because in shim we're doing "look for all installed kernels; run 'dkms uninstall' for a kernel the dkms module may never have built for; try to sign the modules; run 'dkms install'" but in dkms we're doing "build the modules for this exact kernel version, then sign them"
[16:23] <infinity> doko: Well, that's a much newer version.
[16:24] <slangasek> infinity: so if the dkms build doesn't spit out any modules that we're able to find and sign, I'd rather see those failures
[16:24] <infinity> slangasek: Fair, and I would expect it to fail earlier for other reasons, but if the code flow does get that far, I'd find it bombinb in the signing part to be weird and confusing, so the empty test is correct even if it's a no-op. :P
[16:24]  * infinity waves his hand hand-wavingly.
[16:25] <sil2100> slangasek: yeah, as per what infinity said, it wasn't a blocker per-se, it was just something we wanted to get in for the nearest re-spin if possible
[16:25] <slangasek> infinity: well, think of it as a poor-man's assert in shell, if that helps?  I'm saying that I believe it's correct that it should never fail and therefore if it does I need to know about it in order to debug my assumptions
[16:25] <infinity> slangasek: Don't feel strongly either way, I just consider "poor shell globbing instead of exiting for sane reasons earlier" to be about as readable "no, really, python tracebacks are totally better than error handling".
[16:25] <infinity> s/readable/readable as/
[16:26] <infinity> slangasek: Your assumption is probably correct.  But as this is new code, if your assumption turns out to be incorrect, you've introduced a bug.  If your assumption is correct, the test is a no-op.
[16:27] <slangasek> infinity: if my assumption turns out to be incorrect it's still less buggy than the version currently in bionic
[16:27] <slangasek> fails on a strict subset of machines
[16:27] <slangasek> and I'll need to know it's buggy in order to prioritize getting it fixed before GA
[16:27] <infinity> slangasek: Oh, yes, I'm not arguing at all about the validity of this upload compared to the previous. :)
[16:27] <slangasek> ok
[16:27] <slangasek> so if you want to accept this, I think the next upload will do the 'find' thing
[16:27] <infinity> slangasek: Just about the eventual "final form", since we were discussing changing it a bit more anyway.
[16:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dkms [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.3-3ubuntu8]
[16:30] <slangasek> infinity: ta
[16:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot amd64 [Bionic Final] has been updated (20101020ubuntu539)
[16:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot arm64 [Bionic Final] has been updated (20101020ubuntu539)
[16:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot armhf [Bionic Final] has been updated (20101020ubuntu539)
[16:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot i386 [Bionic Final] has been updated (20101020ubuntu539)
[16:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot ppc64el [Bionic Final] has been updated (20101020ubuntu539)
[16:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot s390x [Bionic Final] has been updated (20101020ubuntu539)
[16:34] <cyphermox> sil2100: netplan is in unapproved.
[16:35] <sil2100> cyphermox: looking!
[16:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libmatemixer (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.20.0-0ubuntu1 => 1.20.0-1] (ubuntu-mate, ubuntukylin) (sync)
[16:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: eom (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.20.0-0ubuntu1 => 1.20.0-1] (ubuntu-mate, ubuntukylin) (sync)
[16:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mate-calc (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.20.1-0ubuntu1 => 1.20.1-1] (ubuntu-mate, ubuntukylin, xubuntu) (sync)
[16:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mate-applets (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.20.1-2ubuntu1 => 1.20.1-3] (ubuntu-mate) (sync)
[16:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted netplan.io [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.36]
[16:49] <sil2100> All langpacks approved
[16:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mate-themes (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.22.16-2ubuntu1 => 3.22.16-4ubuntu1] (ubuntu-mate)
[16:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted zfs-linux [source] (artful-proposed) [0.6.5.11-1ubuntu3.4]
[16:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: skiboot (bionic-proposed/main) [5.10~rc4-1 => 5.10~rc4-1ubuntu1] (core)
[16:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted zfs-linux [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.6.5.6-0ubuntu21]
[16:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pyqt5 (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.10.1+dfsg-1ubuntu1 => 5.10.1+dfsg-1ubuntu2] (kubuntu, qt5) (sync)
[17:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: latte-dock (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.7.4-0ubuntu1 => 0.7.4-0ubuntu2] (kubuntu)
[17:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cpprest (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.10.2-5 => 2.10.2-6] (no packageset) (sync)
[17:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nlohmann-json (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.1.1-1 => 2.1.1-1.1] (no packageset) (sync)
[17:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cpprest [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.10.2-6]
[17:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nlohmann-json [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.1.1-1.1]
[17:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted skiboot [source] (bionic-proposed) [5.10~rc4-1ubuntu1]
[17:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debian-installer (bionic-proposed/main) [20101020ubuntu539 => 20101020ubuntu540] (core)
[17:42] <infinity> apw: ^--- This should work.
[18:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted caja-extensions [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.20.0-1]
[18:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted eom [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.20.0-1]
[18:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mate-applets [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.20.1-3]
[18:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mate-indicator-applet [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.20.0-1]
[18:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mate-netbook [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.20.0-1]
[18:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mate-sensors-applet [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.20.1-3]
[18:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mate-user-share [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.20.0-1]
[18:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted engrampa [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.20.0-1]
[18:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mate-calc [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.20.1-1]
[18:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mate-polkit [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.20.0-1]
[18:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-caja [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.20.0-1]
[18:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libmatemixer [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.20.0-1]
[18:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mate-system-monitor [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.20.0-1]
[18:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mate-media [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.20.0-1]
[18:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pyqt5 [sync] (bionic-proposed) [5.10.1+dfsg-1ubuntu2]
[18:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted debian-installer [source] (bionic-proposed) [20101020ubuntu540]
[18:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mate-themes [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.22.16-4ubuntu1]
[18:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted latte-dock [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.7.4-0ubuntu2]
[18:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: eom [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.20.0-1] (ubuntu-mate, ubuntukylin)
[18:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: eom [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.20.0-1] (ubuntu-mate, ubuntukylin)
[18:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: eom [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.20.0-1] (ubuntu-mate, ubuntukylin)
[18:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-prime [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.8.8]
[18:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: eom [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.20.0-1] (ubuntu-mate, ubuntukylin)
[18:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: eom [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.20.0-1] (ubuntu-mate, ubuntukylin)
[18:20] <slangasek> infinity: what's your evening schedule looking like?  anything that you need me to cover / keep eyes on while you're e.g. grabbing a bite?
[18:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: eom [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.20.0-1] (ubuntu-mate, ubuntukylin)
[18:21] <infinity> slangasek: I think the current plan is to let the world settle and kick off a fresh set of images before bed (in 4 or 5 hours or so).
[18:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted eom [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [1.20.0-1]
[18:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted eom [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [1.20.0-1]
[18:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted eom [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [1.20.0-1]
[18:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted eom [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [1.20.0-1]
[18:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted eom [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [1.20.0-1]
[18:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted eom [i386] (bionic-proposed) [1.20.0-1]
[18:21] <infinity> apw: ^-- Assuming you are happy with your kernel and let it migrate.
[18:21] <slangasek> infinity: ok.  do you have a list of must-have packages that I should help shepherd?
[18:23] <infinity> slangasek: Anything seeded and less than 2 days old (which for most flavours is just kernel/d-i/dkms, I believe, and for mate and kylin is a bunch of stuff that got minor syncs this afternoon.
[18:23] <infinity> )
[18:23] <slangasek> that's less a list than it is an algorithm
[18:24] <slangasek> ok, I'll work through update_excuses
[18:26] <slangasek> sforshee, apw: I see linux-meta-raspi2 reporting a bunch of arm64 'in progress' tests which I expect won't work.  Are you effectively able to ignore these missing test results on your side?  and would raspi2 be ready to promote already?
[18:27] <infinity> slangasek: Also did an update run of metas for all flavours, kylin and studio were the only two with pending changes, so lobbing those at the queue.
[18:27] <infinity> slangasek: And yeah, raspi2 on arm64 tests very unhelpfully install the kernel, reboot, fail to boot (because lol booting raspi2 kernel on kvm), and then go AWOL.
[18:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntukylin-meta (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.29 => 0.30] (ubuntukylin)
[18:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntustudio-meta (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.177 => 0.178] (ubuntustudio)
[18:29] <sforshee> slangasek: I don't know of anything we can do to ignore those on our end, I think apw was looking into it at some point
[18:30] <slangasek> infinity: yeah, I already badtested linux-raspi2/arm64 itself for this, it's just a question of whether the kernel team is going to appropriately override this
[18:30] <slangasek> sforshee: to ignore them on your end, 1) manually parse the report with your eyeballs, 2) confirm there are no other blockers aside from these abberant arm64 results, 3) close the blocking bug ;)
[18:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot amd64 [Bionic Final] has been updated (20101020ubuntu540)
[18:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot arm64 [Bionic Final] has been updated (20101020ubuntu540)
[18:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot armhf [Bionic Final] has been updated (20101020ubuntu540)
[18:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot i386 [Bionic Final] has been updated (20101020ubuntu540)
[18:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot ppc64el [Bionic Final] has been updated (20101020ubuntu540)
[18:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot s390x [Bionic Final] has been updated (20101020ubuntu540)
[18:33] <sforshee> slangasek: that works for the tracking bug, britney still seems to want tests to have actually run though
[18:34] <sforshee> that's the part that we don't seem to have a way to bypass
[18:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: extundelete (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.2.4-1build1 => 0.2.4-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[18:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted extundelete [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.2.4-1ubuntu1]
[18:47] <sforshee> slangasek: we don't normally promote derivatives before the master kernel do we?
[18:50] <mparillo> On a Kubuntu Mailing List, I saw a call for testing volunteers for other flavors. This weekend, I could have sworn there were test cases for Lubuntu Next, but I do not see them now. I assume I did something wrong this weekend?
[18:51] <infinity> mparillo: lubuntu-next ISOs are not being released, they only exist for testing purposes before the switch.
[18:51] <infinity> (much like kubuntu-active and kubuntu-plasma in the past)
[18:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: caja (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.20.2-1ubuntu1 => 1.20.2-3ubuntu1] (ubuntu-mate, ubuntukylin, xubuntu)
[18:54] <mparillo> Thank you. So I must have gone to the Daily this weekend where I saw the Lubuntu Next instead of the Final where I do not..
[19:00] <slangasek> sforshee: I don't have an opinion on kernel team internal policy wrt ordering of promotions; as far as I'm concerned they don't need to wait for the master to be released first.  As for britney wanting the tests to be run, that's something I can override on our side
[19:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ext3grep (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.10.2-3 => 0.10.2-3ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[19:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ext3grep [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.10.2-3ubuntu1]
[19:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ext4magic (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.3.2-7 => 0.3.2-7ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[19:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ext4magic [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.3.2-7ubuntu1]
[19:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntukylin-meta [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.30]
[19:13]  * tsimonq2 confirms infinity's statement that Lubuntu Next will not have a release.
[19:13] <infinity> slangasek: Internal policy is for everything to follow master, just for sanity's sake, since we rely on master testing to expose a bunch of potential problems where flavour testing lacks coverage.
[19:13] <infinity> slangasek: On the other hand, the only kernel I care about today is master anyway.
[19:13] <infinity> Well, and I guess raspi2, since it's also baked into an image.
[19:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: transgui (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.0.1-5ubuntu1 => 5.0.1-5.1] (no packageset) (sync)
[19:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted transgui [sync] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.1-5.1]
[19:14] <infinity> sforshee: Can you speak for master and the rightness or wrongness of removing the proposed block, or are you deferring that to Andy?
[19:15] <sforshee> infinity: adt on master looks good, sru testing is in progress but I can peek at the results so far
[19:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntustudio-meta [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.178]
[19:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted caja [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.20.2-3ubuntu1]
[19:27] <tsimonq2> infinity, slangasek: Not urgent, but can I please get eyes on bug 1757658?
[19:27] <ubot5`> bug 1757658 in holdingnuts (Ubuntu) "Please port your package away from Qt 4" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1757658
[19:27] <tsimonq2> Needs a source package removal of an unseeded Qt 4 package that is dead upstream.
[19:28] <tsimonq2> Also hasn't seen a Debian upload since oldoldstable, and it's in sync with Debian.
[19:28] <slangasek> tsimonq2: is this the last one required in order to remove qt4 from bionic?
[19:28] <tsimonq2> slangasek: Nope.
[19:29] <tsimonq2> We're a bit far from that goal.
[19:29] <tsimonq2> 18.10 or 19.04 is more likely.
[19:29] <slangasek> tsimonq2: then unless you have a complete list of packages that you think it's reasonable for us to remove in order to get qt4 out of bionic, I don't think it's worth rm'ing packages that are not RC buggy in Debian
[19:29] <slangasek> (currently, Debian bug #874917 is filed as wishlist)
[19:29] <ubot5`> Debian bug 874917 in src:holdingnuts "[holdingnuts] Future Qt4 removal from Buster" [Wishlist,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/874917
[19:30] <slangasek> tsimonq2: unless there is more broken in holdingnuts than "using an old toolkit"
[19:30] <tsimonq2> OK.
[19:31]  * acheronuk thinks worth keeping just for the name....
[19:31] <tsimonq2> hehe
[19:32] <tsimonq2> slangasek: At the beginning of next cycle though, while we're on the subject, I plan on working with acheronuk to drastically reduce the Qt 4 packages in the archive.
[19:32] <tsimonq2> Taking out KDE 4 is a big part of that.
[19:33] <tsimonq2> I really don't want to have to support those for the LTS but it's too late now.
[19:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim-signed (bionic-proposed/main) [1.34.4 => 1.34.5] (core)
[19:35] <sforshee> infinity: so for the tests look okay, but still a lot of tests outstanding. I don't have any ppc results yet.
[19:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: felix-latin (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.0-8build1 => 2.0-10] (no packageset) (sync)
[19:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted felix-latin [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.0-10]
[19:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rkward (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.6.5-1 => 0.7.0-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[19:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rkward [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.7.0-1]
[19:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dkms (bionic-proposed/main) [2.3-3ubuntu8 => 2.3-3ubuntu9] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[19:43] <fossfreedom> huh? I spy a "DD-Series" for PPA's to copy to
[19:45] <tsimonq2> Like CC-Series, you can't actually build packages for it yet.
[19:45] <tsimonq2> But, you can target bugs at it.
[19:45] <fossfreedom> 19.04 seems so far away ...
[19:45] <tsimonq2> Not really. ;)
[19:46] <fossfreedom> :)
[19:48] <slangasek> tsimonq2: one would think you're not under any obligation to support them in the LTS if they're not seeded
[19:49] <slangasek> sforshee: no ppc results> is everything working there as expected?  do I need to go chasing hardware on your behalf?
[19:50] <tsimonq2> slangasek: I /guess/...
[19:50] <sforshee> slangasek: maas iw having trouble talking to the bmc, not sure we have anyone around to troubleshoot that
[19:51] <sforshee> slangasek: so if there's some hardware to use then I could run the tests manually
[19:51] <Wimpress> slangasek: You said a kernel was expected. I see it is in proposed. When it lands will also the iso get respun?
[19:52] <slangasek> Wimpress: yes.  that's the trigger for all of the respins that infinity mentioned in his "test now" email
[19:52] <slangasek> sforshee: is this on entei or on some other machine?
[19:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mutter (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.1-1 => 3.28.1-1ubuntu1] (desktop-extra, ubuntu-desktop)
[19:52] <slangasek> mutter grumble
[19:53] <slangasek> sforshee: not sure we have anyone around> we absolutely need to get this unblocked ASAP
[19:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-shell (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.1-0ubuntu1 => 3.28.1-0ubuntu2] (desktop-extra, mozilla, ubuntu-desktop)
[19:59] <jbicha> not sure there's a big difference between mutter and grumble ;)
[20:07] <jbicha> infinity: could you have cc-series derive from Buster (maybe even Sid)? The "derived from" section at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/bionic wasn't very useful
[20:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted shim-signed [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.34.5]
[20:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: deepin-icon-theme (bionic-proposed/universe) [15.12.56-1 => 15.12.56-3] (no packageset) (sync)
[20:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted deepin-icon-theme [sync] (bionic-proposed) [15.12.56-3]
[20:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: scala (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.11.12-1 => 2.11.12-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[20:13] <rbalint> Laney: re: modemmanager and libqmi why -Wno-error or cast is better than setting proper glib api? new upstream is waiting in unstable anyway for next sync
[20:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted scala [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.11.12-2]
[20:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: php-sabredav (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.8.12-3ubuntu2 => 1.8.12-5] (no packageset) (sync)
[20:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted php-sabredav [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.8.12-5]
[20:20] <rbalint> Laney: both -Wno-error and casting can hide problems later while it is true that modemmanager and libqmi don't work with newer API
[20:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: flightgear (bionic-proposed/universe) [1:2017.3.1+dfsg-4 => 1:2018.1.1+dfsg-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[20:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-mate-meta (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.223 => 1.224] (ubuntu-mate)
[20:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted flightgear [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1:2018.1.1+dfsg-1]
[20:43] <sforshee> slangasek: bjf got the machine back, it's going to take a bit if we want to run all the testing though
[20:43] <sforshee> so what's your timeline?
[20:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dkms (bionic-proposed/main) [2.3-3ubuntu8 => 2.3-3ubuntu9] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[20:45] <slangasek> sforshee: I want a thoroughly tested golden kernel, ready to release, asap; and I want you to tell me when that will be :-)
[20:46] <slangasek> sforshee: I don't want to take any shortcuts on the testing but I want to know if we're going to miss infinity's window for this being done tonight
[20:47] <slangasek> sforshee: (he said "4 or 5 hours" 2 hours ago, so if the tests will take longer than 3h then I need to know that in order to coordinate a handoff from infinity)
[20:53] <sforshee> slangasek: it will be more than 3 hours
[20:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-mate-settings (bionic-proposed/universe) [18.04.16 => 18.04.17] (ubuntu-mate)
[20:58] <slangasek> sforshee: ok. how many more?
[21:00] <slangasek> infinity: ^^ you don't get ppc64el-tested kernels promoted to bionic within your "4-5 hours" window.  Do you want to tag me in to do the respins once this has all landed?  Do you want to give me the command list you want me to run?
[21:00] <slangasek> infinity: alternatively, should we opportunistically promote this kernel as soon as we have initial smoketest results on ppc64el?
[21:01] <sforshee> slangasek: I honestly don't know, we don't usually watch them that closely. Let me see if I can get a rough estimate from previous runs.
[21:01] <slangasek> sforshee: ta
[21:15] <Laney> rbalint: Casting is not a problem.
[21:17] <Laney> Building in the distro with Werror is quite often a problem
[21:17] <Laney> (not here)
[21:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dkms (bionic-proposed/main) [2.3-3ubuntu8 => 2.3-3ubuntu9] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[21:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected dkms [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.3-3ubuntu9]
[21:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected dkms [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.3-3ubuntu9]
[21:23] <rbalint> Laney: is setting proper API version limits a problem?
[21:24] <rbalint> Laney: because this is less intrusive and cheaper than starting fixing casts
[21:25] <sforshee> slangasek: my best guess is about 5-6 hours, that's a really rough estimate though
[21:26] <slangasek> sforshee: ok thanks
[21:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dkms [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.3-3ubuntu9]
[21:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: netplan.io (bionic-proposed/main) [0.36 => 0.36.1] (core)
[21:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ikarus (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.0.3+bzr.2010.01.26-4build1 => 0.0.3+bzr.2010.01.26-4ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[21:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ikarus [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.0.3+bzr.2010.01.26-4ubuntu1]
[21:47] <sil2100> infinity: reviewing the fixed netboot.io from the queue
[21:47] <sil2100> s/netboot.io/netplan.io
[21:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted netplan.io [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.36.1]
[22:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: command-not-found (bionic-proposed/main) [18.04.3 => 18.04.4] (core)
[22:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-hwe (bionic-proposed/multiverse) [5.2.10-dfsg-4ubuntu18.04.1 => 5.2.10-dfsg-5ubuntu18.04.1] (no packageset)
[22:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox-hwe [source] (bionic-proposed) [5.2.10-dfsg-5ubuntu18.04.1]
[22:32] <sil2100> infinity, apw: are we still waiting for the kernels to migrate? Since I see d-i is blocked on that
[22:32] <slangasek> sil2100: we are
[22:33] <slangasek> sil2100: according to sforshee we have several hours before the ppc64el tests complete.  We could potentially release the packages into the release opportunistically
[22:33] <slangasek> sil2100: knowing that if the ppc64el kernel fails its tests, we will need another iteration
[22:35]  * sil2100 sneaks in the c-n-f before Adam can kill him for it
[22:35] <slangasek> jbicha: php-sabredav, regressed autopkgtests
[22:36] <slangasek> I swear proposed-migration is running more slowly because we're watching it
[22:36] <slangasek> either that or ftp-master is very sad
[22:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted command-not-found [source] (bionic-proposed) [18.04.4]
[22:37] <sforshee> slangasek: based on the progress so far I'm fearing they'll take longer than I guessed
[22:38] <slangasek> sforshee: have the tests gotten far enough along before failing that you would consider this a good smoketest for ppc64el?  what do you think about us promoting the kernels now in order to unblock image builds, and dealing with any ppc64el failures after the tests finish?
[22:39] <sforshee> slangasek: the qa regression tests ran without errors so I'd say that's pretty good
[22:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-mate-meta [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.224]
[22:40] <sil2100> hm
[22:40] <slangasek> sforshee: do you want to start clearing blocking bugs on your side, then?  with the understanding that it's still a high priority to get a green test for ppc64el for release and we might still respin the world if we have to bump the kernel
[22:44] <sil2100> If the kernel teams feel it's safe to lift the block tags from the kernels, I'm fine with that (especially that we're blocked on this)
[22:44] <jbicha> slangasek: yes I am reopening the Debian bug for php-sabredav
[22:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-h8300-hms (bionic-proposed/universe) [1:3.4.6+dfsg2-4ubuntu2 => 1:3.4.6+dfsg2-4ubuntu3] (no packageset)
[22:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-h8300-hms [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:3.4.6+dfsg2-4ubuntu3]
[23:00] <sforshee> slangasek: are you ok with us not having adt results for systemd against this kernel?
[23:01] <sforshee> I just started them, not sure how long they usually take
[23:01] <slangasek> sforshee: I do see systemd results at http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#linux-meta; what's missing?
[23:01] <sforshee> slangasek: they just showed up as miss in the adt matrix, typically that would mean a new systemd promoted and we don't have results against that version
[23:02] <slangasek> oh
[23:02] <slangasek> sforshee: I don't think the changes between systemd 237-3ubuntu8 and 237-3ubuntu10 are interesting wrt kernel promotion
[23:03] <sforshee> ok
[23:03] <slangasek> one networkd change; one udev-udeb change; one journald change
[23:10] <sil2100> Ok, seeing that this will still take a while, I think I'll go to sleep now
[23:11] <sil2100> I saw the s390x netplan.io tests failing again with the new version, but this seemed a bit more racy - I re-ran it just in case
[23:11] <slangasek> sil2100: netplan.io/s390x is listed always-failed
[23:11] <slangasek> anyway, g'night!
[23:12] <sil2100> Ah, crap, right! I was just opening all the tests for netplan that run
[23:19] <slangasek> hmph, we didn't drop the transitional nplan package from the minimal seed
[23:19] <slangasek> (and I don't plan to now)
[23:24] <sil2100> Oh well, not perfect I guess but I don't see a big issue leaving it as is
[23:25] <sil2100> But I might not understand all the consequences of course
[23:25] <slangasek> sil2100: just cruft left behind forever on systems ;)
[23:26] <sil2100> ;)
[23:28] <sil2100> Ok, netplan.io amd64 failed, that one should be passing
[23:28] <sforshee> slangasek: ok I removed the blocking tags from the bugs
[23:28] <slangasek> sil2100: yes; I've already retried it; was discussing on internal chan w/ cyphermox about the apparent raciness of ipv6 after systemd-networkd changes
[23:28] <sil2100> The test-suite seems to be flaky so I guess this might just need a re-run
[23:29] <sil2100> slangasek: thanks!
[23:29] <cyphermox> one of these two tests should definitely not have failed, the other is expected fallout from networkd changes
[23:29] <sforshee> slangasek: we're only worried about master and raspi2 right now? Or do I also need to check testing on the others?
[23:29] <cyphermox> I'm not sure they will be racy; might be permanent fail until I fix it
[23:29] <sil2100> Ok, I see things are in capable hands as always, good night!
[23:29] <cyphermox> slangasek: ah, I didn't notice it passed once
[23:30] <slangasek> sforshee: master and raspi2 are the priority for spinning images.  I am interested in having them all in today if possible, it's not as urgent but we do need to get on with the cloud image builds as well
[23:30] <sforshee> I'll see where they are at
[23:31] <cyphermox> slangasek: now I go fix shim-signed one more time; shim-signed MOK migration take UINT_MAX
[23:32] <slangasek> cyphermox: what else needs fixing there? nothing else was on my radar
[23:33] <cyphermox> bumping version in migration?
[23:33] <slangasek> cyphermox: oh yes
[23:34] <slangasek> cyphermox: thanks ;-)
[23:35] <cyphermox> np. I do need to have a quick check though; hoping extra appended signatures wouldn't break things
[23:37] <slangasek> badtesting netplan.io/0.36.1 since we understand the cause of these regressions and need that in asap
[23:38] <slangasek> which I think means there's nothing else we're waiting for except the next p-m + publisher run
[23:42] <Wimpress> slangasek: Please can you accept ubuntu-mate-settings 18.04.17
[23:42] <sforshee> slangasek: we still don't have a lot of results for the azure and kvm kernels, aws is looking fine though
[23:50] <slangasek> Wimpress: looking
[23:50] <slangasek> sforshee: what other results are you lacking on azure? http://people.canonical.com/~kernel/status/adt-matrix/bionic-linux-meta-azure.html looks complete to me
[23:51] <sforshee> slangasek: our sru testing
[23:52] <slangasek> sforshee: and that shows up somewhere other than the matrix?
[23:52] <sforshee> slangasek: yep
[23:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-mate-settings [source] (bionic-proposed) [18.04.17]
[23:53] <cyphermox> sforshee: once I'm done with this I'm happy to help testing azure/kvm kernels if you tell me what the testing entails
[23:53] <slangasek> I expect it's all automated and we just need to wait :)
[23:53] <slangasek> sforshee, cyphermox: anyway, if testing is still in progress on those, I don't need to rush it
[23:53] <Wimpress> slangasek: Thanks.
[23:54] <sforshee> slangasek: http://kernel.ubuntu.com/sru/dashboards/web/kernel-stable-board.html has links
[23:54] <sforshee> and yes it's automated
[23:54] <cyphermox> ack
[23:54] <cyphermox> shim-signed incoming.\
[23:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim-signed (bionic-proposed/main) [1.34.5 => 1.34.6] (core)
[23:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim-signed (bionic-proposed/main) [1.34.5 => 1.34.6] (core)
[23:55] <cyphermox> err?
[23:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim-signed (bionic-proposed/main) [1.34.5 => 1.34.6] (core)