[00:01] <slangasek> sforshee: yes it has links, to internal IPs I don't have access to. ohwell :)
[00:04] <slangasek> Trevinho, jbicha: hi, I haven't seen any commentary on whether and why the mutter + gnome-shell uploads are critical for release; if you're expecting this to land in the GA image please fill us in on the details
[00:05] <slangasek> Trevinho, jbicha: as we are otherwise just about to start rolling candidate images, and need to know whether to hold off ubuntu + budgie until these are in
[00:15] <slangasek> sforshee: linux tests appear to have passed on ppc64el http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/l/linux/bionic/ppc64el
[00:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mutter (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.1-1 => 3.28.1-2] (desktop-extra, ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[00:30] <jbicha> slangasek: seb128 at least wanted the gnome-shell policykit fix in for release. maybe mutter wouldn't hurt too?
[00:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mutter (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.1-1 => 3.28.1-2] (desktop-extra, ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[00:30] <jbicha> here's a mutter sync if you prefer. It's practically the same as the ubuntu1 upload
[00:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mutter (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.1-1 => 3.28.1-2] (desktop-extra, ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[00:31]  * jbicha stares at queuebot
[00:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mutter (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.1-1 => 3.28.1-2] (desktop-extra, ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[00:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mutter (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.1-1 => 3.28.1-2] (desktop-extra, ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[00:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mutter (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.1-1 => 3.28.1-2] (desktop-extra, ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[00:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mutter (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.1-1 => 3.28.1-2] (desktop-extra, ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[00:33] <jbicha> queuebot: stop muttering!
[00:33] <slangasek> jbicha: I have no reason to prefer a sync; I prefer that someone tell me it's worth delaying the start of candidate image spins by 2+h
[00:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mutter (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.1-1 => 3.28.1-2] (desktop-extra, ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[00:34] <slangasek> jbicha: I mean, I prefer someone tell me /whether/ it's worth delaying; obviously all things being equal I prefer that to not be the answer ;)
[00:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mutter (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.1-1 => 3.28.1-2] (desktop-extra, ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[00:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mutter (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.1-1 => 3.28.1-2] (desktop-extra, ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[00:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mutter (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.1-1 => 3.28.1-2] (desktop-extra, ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[00:35] <jbicha> there apparently is no one around for Desktop now but me
[00:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mutter (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.1-1 => 3.28.1-2] (desktop-extra, ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[00:35] <jbicha> my understanding is that Seb did really want that gnome-shell fix in but understands if it ends up being a 0-day SRU instead
[00:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mutter (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.1-1 => 3.28.1-2] (desktop-extra, ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[00:36] <jbicha> unfortunately, I guess there's a decent chance we'll end up respinning again :(
[00:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mutter (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.1-1 => 3.28.1-2] (desktop-extra, ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[00:37] <jbicha> it doesn't feel like that particular bug is technically release critical… so maybe there's no need to wait on spinning up candidates
[00:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mutter (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.1-1 => 3.28.1-2] (desktop-extra, ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[00:37] <slangasek> jbicha: ok
[00:37] <jbicha> on the other hand, it looks like queuebot really wants you to accept mutter or something
[00:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mutter (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.1-1 => 3.28.1-2] (desktop-extra, ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[00:37]  * slangasek goes with "or something"
[00:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mutter (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.1-1 => 3.28.1-2] (desktop-extra, ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[00:38] <jbicha> lol
[00:46] <Trevinho> slangasek: mutter one would be nicer to have, as otherwise we're getting lots of errors and whoopsie dialogs for the wrong reason, but in theory we could even wait for .1. For shell surely we can wait if it makes things problematic
[00:47] <Trevinho> I had these prepared before the FF, but they were not sposorized, so we ended up pushing them later
[00:47] <sforshee> slangasek: systemd tests are failing with all the amd64 kernels ...
[00:47] <slangasek> Trevinho: taking any new packages is problematic in the sense that it pushes back the timeline for spinning candidate images.  "whoopsie dialogs" on the live image sound like a bad thing, to be sure
[00:48] <Trevinho> well, not that they show all the time
[00:48] <Trevinho> but they might show on Xwayland issues pointing out that the problem is in mutter instead (which is not true)
[00:48] <slangasek> sforshee: that's not a bug in the kernel but in the tests.  The fact that linux-image now comes from linux-signed source instead of linux source confuses the way we're running the tests and will need fixed
[00:48] <sforshee> slangasek: that's good to hear
[00:49] <slangasek> sforshee: I can try to run some tests that include linux-signed if that would give you greater confidence
[00:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dehydrated (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.6.1-1 => 0.6.1-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[00:49] <slangasek> Trevinho: ok. for the moment I'm focused on getting us to where we can start spinning images and if you or seb128 decide this is critical to fix in the GA image we can revisit
[00:50] <sforshee> slangasek: I was already coming to the conclusion that it wasn't a kernel issue anyway, so it's fine
[00:50] <Trevinho> slangasek: for sure not critical, and if it makes more problems than improvements, just don't mind about that.... we'll SRU it
[00:54] <slangasek> sforshee: I did go ahead and kick off fresh tests, might as well make use of that idle cloud
[00:55] <sforshee> ack
[01:17] <infinity> slangasek: Looking at excuses, it looks like mate-settings and shim-signed are the only things currently migrating?
[01:17] <infinity> slangasek: (or migrated)
[01:18] <infinity> slangasek: There are definitely some more ubiquity fixes we want to land tomorrow, but I think we want a full respin tonight to see if people can test the new kernel and discover bits that have gone goofy with the package reorg.
[01:19] <infinity> slangasek: So, from the nusakan CLI, run the full ubuntu-server pipeline from crontab, and then on iso.qa, request rebuilds for all desktop ISOs.  Don't bother with base.
[01:19] <infinity> slangasek: (once that shim-signed is definitely published)
[01:21] <slangasek> infinity: they are in the process of migrating yes
[01:21] <slangasek> infinity: and I've twiddled OFFICIAL in CONF.sh
[01:22] <infinity> slangasek: If we can get solid kernel testing over the next 12+ hours, then we can tidy up any remaining bugs (or hope for none), finalize base-files and OFFICIAL, and spin final tomorrow night.
[01:22] <infinity> slangasek: Or twiddle OFFICIAL now. :P
[01:22] <slangasek> is base-files not yet finalized? it's no longer in the queue, which I though it was previously
[01:23] <slangasek> hmm
[01:23] <infinity> slangasek: It was rejected to avoid premature acceptance.  Didn't actually review it to make sure it was sane.
[01:23] <slangasek> I assumed it being gone meant it was already in
[01:24] <slangasek> so, I guess anything I spin now will clearly also not be final
[01:24] <slangasek> want me to review that now?
[01:24] <infinity> slangasek: Nah, like I said, I'm pretty positive we'll have more fixes tomorrow.
[01:24] <slangasek> ok
[01:25] <infinity> slangasek: I just want a respin tonight because this kernel shuffle can't possibly have no side-effects (though, I'm prepared to be pleasantly surprised)
[01:25] <slangasek> well, in that respect maybe it's useful for me to respin ubuntu-server now without waiting for shim-signed, to verify whether building a d-i-based image succeeds
[01:26] <infinity> slangasek: d-i is the only one that I'm pretty sure won't be harmed.
[01:27] <infinity> slangasek: Since the CD bits come from the d-i build (which I made sure is fine), and the kernel is installed by installing packages.
[01:27] <slangasek> ah :)
[01:28] <slangasek> "sophos running at time of implementation, blocking the update" wtf? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shim-signed/+bug/1766385
[01:28] <ubot5`> Ubuntu bug 1766385 in shim-signed (Ubuntu) "package shim-signed 1.34.5+13-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: installed shim-signed package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1" [Undecided,New]
[01:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xfpanel-switch (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0.7-0ubuntu1 => 1.0.7-0ubuntu2] (ubuntustudio, xubuntu)
[01:34] <infinity> slangasek: A quick look at debian-cd implies that live-based images should probably end up with a bootable kernel.  A quick scrub of ubiquity looks like it'll DTRT.  The code is now entirely logically wrong WRT it thinking there's no "signed kernel", but the result will be correct, I think.
[01:35] <infinity> slangasek: Anyhow, better to test than to read code and assume I parse python the same was as the interpreter.
[01:35] <slangasek> k
[01:35] <infinity> s/was/way/
[01:36] <infinity> slangasek: We'll also have the bug all over that we install the linux-signed transitional meta when we don't need to.  I think I'll defer that bug for 18.04.1, unless all the fixes jump out as obvious in the first couple of hours in the office tomorrow.
[01:36] <slangasek> infinity: I would suggest deferring it entirely to 18.10, it's just an extra dummy package
[01:36] <infinity> slangasek: Or that.  Not super picky about the cruft indeed.
[01:37]  * infinity is going to try to get a nap in before morning in the arctic circle slaps him in the face.
[01:38] <infinity> Sunrise before 6am is barbaric.
[01:41] <bluesabre> That sounds unpleasant.
[01:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dgit (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.3 => 4.4] (no packageset) (sync)
[01:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dgit [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.4]
[01:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server amd64 [Bionic Final] has been updated (20180424)
[01:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64 [Bionic Final] has been updated (20180424)
[01:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server ppc64el [Bionic Final] has been updated (20180424)
[01:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server s390x [Bionic Final] has been updated (20180424)
[01:49] <slangasek> button pushing
[01:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: hugo (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.39-1 => 0.40-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[01:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted hugo [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.40-1]
[01:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Alternate amd64 [Bionic Final] has been updated (20180424)
[01:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Alternate i386 [Bionic Final] has been updated (20180424)
[02:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvptx-tools (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.20171010-1 => 0.20180301-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[02:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvptx-tools [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.20180301-1]
[02:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server amd64 [Bionic Final] has been updated (20180424.1)
[02:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64 [Bionic Final] has been updated (20180424.1)
[02:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server ppc64el [Bionic Final] has been updated (20180424.1)
[02:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server s390x [Bionic Final] has been updated (20180424.1)
[02:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop amd64 [Bionic Final] has been updated (20180424)
[02:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop i386 [Bionic Final] has been updated (20180424)
[02:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop amd64 [Bionic Final] has been updated (20180424)
[02:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop i386 [Bionic Final] has been updated (20180424)
[02:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop amd64 [Bionic Final] has been updated (20180424)
[02:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop i386 [Bionic Final] has been updated (20180424)
[02:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop amd64 [Bionic Final] has been updated (20180424)
[02:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop amd64 [Bionic Final] has been updated (20180424)
[02:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop i386 [Bionic Final] has been updated (20180424)
[02:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop amd64 [Bionic Final] has been updated (20180424)
[02:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop amd64 [Bionic Final] has been updated (20180424)
[02:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop i386 [Bionic Final] has been updated (20180424)
[02:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop i386 [Bionic Final] has been updated (20180424)
[02:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD amd64 [Bionic Final] has been updated (20180424)
[02:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD i386 [Bionic Final] has been updated (20180424)
[02:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server armhf+raspi2 [Bionic Final] has been updated (20180424)
[03:39] <powersj> slangasek: were the server live images going to be rebuilt as well?
[03:40] <slangasek> powersj: yes, there's one building now (delayed due to terminal copy-paste being terrible for me for some reason I haven't debugged), and there'll be another after mwhudson's updated subiquity snap lands (plus a yet-to-be-uploaded shim-signed)
[03:40] <mwhudson> the snap is in stable now btw
[03:40] <mwhudson> but it missed the current build
[03:41] <powersj> slangasek: safe to test the ubiquity isos though right?
[03:41] <powersj> and thanks
[03:41] <slangasek> powersj: they need testing but they're also not final
[03:41] <slangasek> they're just the ones that have the major kernel+bootloader changes (finally) landed
[03:41] <slangasek> mwhudson: what revision?
[03:41] <mwhudson> slangasek: 346 on amd64
[03:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity amd64 [Bionic Final] has been updated (20180424)
[04:12] <ogasawara> slangasek: I've been notified of bug 1766391.  I will ask apw to address it first thing his morning which is about 3-4hrs from now.
[04:12] <ubot5`> bug 1766391 in shim-signed (Ubuntu Bionic) "package shim-signed (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: installed shim-signed package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 5" [Critical,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1766391
[04:13] <slangasek> ogasawara: ok. I'm not sure what to do with it in the meantime then, since this leaves all users who are upgrading to the kernel in the release pocket broken wrt dkms modules
[04:13] <slangasek> ogasawara: I can leave it as-is, or I can revert the kernel in the release pocket to -15
[04:15] <slangasek> granted, it's going to be a lot more than 4h either way before we have a fixed -20 kernel, so that's probably something to figure out
[04:16] <ogasawara> slangasek: I'm ok if you want to revert it to avoid more carnage because as you say, it's going to be a few hours to get another upload in over the top
[04:16] <ogasawara> sforshee: ^^
[04:18] <sforshee> fine with me to revert it
[04:25] <slangasek> sforshee, ogasawara: on balance, I think we should leave it in; anyone doing a new install is going to have to manually deal with the dkms problem, but those are only test images so that's ok; and anyone who is upgrading only needs to reboot to the old kernel to get back to their working modules, then wait for the fixed kernel to land
[04:25] <slangasek> it's a one-liner fix to the kernel packaging, so I'll try to have something waiting for apw in the morning
[04:26] <slangasek> (unless sforshee wants to land it before then)
[04:26] <sforshee> slangasek: I'm on it, will spin the master and raspi2 kernels at least tonight
[04:26] <slangasek> sforshee: oh excellent
[04:26] <slangasek> sforshee: thanks
[04:28] <sforshee> slangasek: I'll just upload this direct to -proposed, will let you know once I've done that
[04:28] <slangasek> sforshee: ta
[04:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libabigail (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1-1 => 1.2-1] (no packageset)
[04:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libabigail [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.2-1]
[04:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim-signed (bionic-proposed/main) [1.34.6 => 1.34.7] (core)
[04:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected shim-signed [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.34.7]
[04:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim-signed (bionic-proposed/main) [1.34.6 => 1.34.7] (core)
[04:58] <slangasek> infinity, apw, cyphermox: self-accepting shim-signed 1.34.7 after copious testing of the various possible dkms states; more eyeballs welcome when they're available but critical upgrade bug etc
[04:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted shim-signed [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.34.7]
[05:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-meta (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0.19.20 => 4.15.0.20.21] (core, kernel)
[05:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-signed (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-19.20 => 4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[05:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-19.20 => 4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[05:13] <slangasek> tseliot: I think nvidia-headless-390 nvidia-headless-no-dkms-390 want seeding somewhere to keep them in restricted instead of multiverse
[05:13] <slangasek> sforshee: thanks for the uploads.  I need to run out to the store, I'll review as soon as I'm back
[05:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-6 (bionic-proposed/universe) [6.4.0-16ubuntu1 => 6.4.0-17ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[05:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-6 [source] (bionic-proposed) [6.4.0-17ubuntu1]
[05:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-6-cross-ports (bionic-proposed/universe) [28ubuntu2 => 28ubuntu3] (no packageset)
[05:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-6-cross (bionic-proposed/universe) [30ubuntu2 => 30ubuntu3] (no packageset)
[05:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-6-cross-ports [source] (bionic-proposed) [28ubuntu3]
[05:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-6-cross [source] (bionic-proposed) [30ubuntu3]
[05:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-meta-raspi2 (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.15.0.1009.7 => 4.15.0.1010.8] (kernel)
[05:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-raspi2 (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.15.0-1009.10 => 4.15.0-1010.11] (kernel)
[05:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox (bionic-proposed/multiverse) [5.2.10-dfsg-2 => 5.2.10-dfsg-5] (ubuntu-cloud) (sync)
[05:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox (bionic-proposed/multiverse) [5.2.10-dfsg-2 => 5.2.10-dfsg-5] (ubuntu-cloud) (sync)
[05:38] <sforshee> slangasek: raspi2 uploaded, going to bed now
[05:45] <ogasawara> slangasek: calling it a night here as well.  call me if there's more fires.  I've sent email to the team to start respinning the bionic derivative kernels once the EU crew comes online shortly.
[06:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: handbrake (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0.7+ds1-2build3 => 1.1.0+ds1-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[06:10] <slangasek> sforshee, ogasawara: thanks, good night
[06:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted handbrake [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.0+ds1-1]
[06:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-20.21]
[06:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-meta [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0.20.21]
[06:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-signed [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-20.21]
[06:20] <cpaelzer> hi release Team, one question for a CVE in DPDK
[06:20] <cpaelzer> I "could" just run syncpackage -r bionic-proposed -d unstable -v -V 17.11.2-1 dpdk to get the fixes we need for the CVE
[06:20] <cpaelzer> but we are so close to the release that I wonder if we need to do otherwise
[06:21] <cpaelzer> I can hand over to the security Team to push to -security right after release maybe?
[06:21] <cpaelzer> or would we still be willing and able to do the sync now, let it build and migrate
[06:21] <cpaelzer> guidance is welcome, let me know which path I should start with (sync now or pass to security Team)
[06:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-raspi2 [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1010.11]
[06:22] <slangasek> cpaelzer: dpdk is in main but not seeded on any images; we could take it today, but it would need to be a targeted fix in order to be accepted, which I don't know if the sync is
[06:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-meta-raspi2 [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0.1010.8]
[06:25] <cpaelzer> slangasek: it is a special early stable release for the cve
[06:25] <slangasek> infinity, apw: linux 4.15.0-20.21 has the critical fixes for dkms breakage; I suppose that's eta 4h for the linux package to be built, then various delays for getting linux-signed and d-i built and everything migrated
[06:25] <cpaelzer> it has two minor fixes that were queued before
[06:25] <cpaelzer> and otherwise just the CVE
[06:25] <cpaelzer> see https://dpdk.org/doc/guides-17.11/rel_notes/release_17_11.html section "2.8.2. 17.11.2"
[06:25] <slangasek> infinity, apw: with that, I'm signing off for the night; enjoy the respinning
[06:26] <cpaelzer> slangasek: also we have a SRU exception for such minor releases (even if it would not be just a CVE fix)
[06:26] <slangasek> cpaelzer: if it's anything that looks non-trivial upon code inspection by a release team member, it'll likely get kicked back; you can always upload it and try, though
[06:26] <slangasek> cpaelzer: final freeze is more strict than the SRU process because there's a fixed deadline for reverts
[06:26] <cpaelzer> I haven't started with the MRE paperwork yet as this is so time critical and limited to the CVE fixes - so I wanted to ask before wasting time
[06:27] <cpaelzer> slangasek: well then it certainly looks WAY++ more complex than usual
[06:27] <cpaelzer> slangasek: so lets do it as post release security update right away
[06:27] <cpaelzer> slangasek: thanks for guidance, that was just what I needed
[06:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [s390x] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[06:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ukui-menu (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.2-0ubuntu1 => 1.1.3-0ubuntu1] (ubuntukylin)
[06:50] <acheronuk> tseliot: new did nvidia-prime fixed sddm issues as well. thanks
[06:50]  * acheronuk downloads new isos
[07:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity amd64 [Bionic Final] has been updated (20180424.1)
[07:03] <tseliot> acheronuk: great, thanks for letting me know
[07:20] <acheronuk> tseliot: I see this in ubuntu-drivers-common, but yet no microcode on isos with the kernels. https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-drivers-common/1:0.5
[07:23] <acheronuk> duh. I mean. https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-drivers-common/1:0.4.23.3
[07:26] <valorie> could connect to the crazy bug I kept running into with oem installs: LP: #1766056
[07:26] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 1766056 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "in Kubuntu Bionic oem install, after installer finishes, it won't shut down to allow reboot" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1766056
[07:32] <acheronuk> apw: so that changes says driver manager detection for microcode with be dropped as kernel meta will depend on microcode, but the 2nd part of that has not been done yet?
[07:32] <seb128> slangasek, could you consider the gnome-shell update for release?
[07:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[07:32] <acheronuk> *will be dropped
[07:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[07:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[07:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[07:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[07:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[07:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[07:36] <acheronuk> so we are doing bionic finals without LP: #1738259 being fixed for bionic?
[07:36] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 1738259 in linux-meta (Ubuntu Bionic) "need to ensure microcode updates are available to all bare-metal installs of Ubuntu" [Critical,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1738259
[07:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[07:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[07:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[07:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[07:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[07:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[07:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[07:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[07:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[07:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[07:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[07:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[07:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[07:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[07:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[07:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[07:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[07:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[07:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[07:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-shell [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.1-0ubuntu2]
[07:46] <slangasek> acheronuk: microcode> correct. most recent version still showed regressions; it's currently targeted at the first SRU cycle after bionic releases
[07:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[07:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-20.21]
[07:47] <Wimpress> slangasek: WIll the images respin for this new kernel?
[07:47] <slangasek> Wimpress: yes
[07:47] <Wimpress> Thanks.
[07:47] <slangasek> (they were going to be respun anyway, according to infinity)
[07:48] <Wimpress> OK, good to know.
[07:48] <Wimpress> The MATE QA team are going to start testing the new images now.
[07:48] <acheronuk> slangasek: ok then. was very doubtful it could be an omission in error, but I had to query. thanks
[07:53] <seb128> slangasek, hey, saw my gnome-shell ping? :)
[07:53] <slangasek> seb128: yah, have accepted it. I was going to look at mutter as well, which I suppose you might also like?
[07:54] <seb128> ah, I didn't notice the accepted, thanks!
[07:54] <seb128> that would be nice
[07:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mutter [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.1-1ubuntu1]
[07:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xfpanel-switch [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.7-0ubuntu2]
[07:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ukui-menu [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.3-0ubuntu1]
[07:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected virtualbox [sync] (bionic-proposed) [5.2.10-dfsg-5]
[07:56] <slangasek> oh, somebody else is awake and reviewing
[07:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox [sync] (bionic-proposed) [5.2.10-dfsg-5]
[07:56] <slangasek> (rather quick reviews, apparently! :)
[08:01] <infinity> slangasek: I tend to review in batches, then accept.
[08:02] <slangasek> infinity: fair :)
[08:02] <infinity> Also, d'oh on the 1-char bug in headers.postinst.in :(
[08:03] <infinity> And pretty obvious why we both missed it in review too, since that directory totally *should* be called headers_postinst, not header_postinst.
[08:03] <LocutusOfBorg> can anybody please do a quick removal? LP: #1765392
[08:03] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 1765392 in hedgewars (Ubuntu) "please remove hedgewars on ppc64el" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1765392
[08:03] <LocutusOfBorg> I'll probably drop ppc64el from supported archs
[08:05] <infinity> "Unfortunately this already happened with arm64"... where it's currently built?
[08:05] <LocutusOfBorg> it is in Ubuntu, but not in Debian
[08:05] <LocutusOfBorg> the fact is that converting pascal to c, and then building with clang (because gcc lacks of some features), is PITA and unsupported upstream
[08:06] <LocutusOfBorg> https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=hedgewars&arch=arm64
[08:06] <LocutusOfBorg> you can see how arm64 sucks :)
[08:06] <infinity> If it's unsupported upstream, why are you doing it that way?
[08:06] <LocutusOfBorg> oh hold on, now arm64 has fpc bootstrapped
[08:06] <LocutusOfBorg> so the problem is "fixed" and will be fixed once ppc64el is bootstrapped too
[08:07] <LocutusOfBorg> I just tried to provide it (upstream gave the possibility to use this experimental pas2c binding), while waiting for the new fpc, ppc64el ready
[08:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-gcp (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1005.5 => 4.15.0-1006.6] (kernel)
[08:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-meta-gcp (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0.1005.7 => 4.15.0.1006.8] (kernel)
[08:08] <LocutusOfBorg> but in the meanwhile fpc got some new ports, and upstream will probably drop it
[08:08] <infinity> LocutusOfBorg: so, if you weren't building it this weird way, it would build on ppc64el?
[08:08] <LocutusOfBorg> too much effort, because pascal is not case sensitive, so the conversion fails badly a lot of times, requiring lots of patches just because of case-sensitiveness and other stuff
[08:08] <infinity> That doesn't seem like a reason for removal. :P
[08:09] <LocutusOfBorg> infinity, there is no fpc on ppc64el
[08:09] <LocutusOfBorg> so, I can't :/
[08:09] <LocutusOfBorg> pas2c is the workaround for this
[08:09] <infinity> Ahh.  So, instead of goofy workarounds, just use fpc, and I'll remove that binary, yes.
[08:09] <infinity> But do the former first.
[08:10] <infinity> I'm not removing some heisenbinary that might magically build again later.
[08:12] <LocutusOfBorg> ack
[08:12] <LocutusOfBorg> it will become building magically once fpc is ported, and will build in "the right way" (tm)
[08:13] <slangasek> infinity: should we just drop pkg-create-dbgsym from the archive? ftbfs and debhelper conflicts/replaces it
[08:13] <LocutusOfBorg> wasn't pkg-create-foo droppable only after 18.04?
[08:14] <slangasek> why?  it's for all intents and purposes uninstallable in any build environment
[08:15] <LocutusOfBorg> I remember requesting the same some months ago on this channel, sorry my memory fails now
[08:15] <LocutusOfBorg> (I trusted the answer and went to another topic)
[08:15] <infinity> slangasek: We should drop it, but someone should also fix mk-sbuild to make its installation  non-fatal.  I'll do that when I pop into the office.
[08:16] <infinity> slangasek: I think that's the only thing that I can think of that will break a little.
[08:16] <slangasek> infinity: ok, I'll give you a bug as a reminder
[08:17] <LocutusOfBorg> infinity, I uploaded the fix
[08:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: appmenu-gtk-module (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.6.94-0ubuntu1 => 0.6.94-1] (ubuntu-mate) (sync)
[08:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: hedgewars (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.9.24.1-dfsg-1 => 0.9.24.1-dfsg-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[08:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted hedgewars [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.9.24.1-dfsg-1ubuntu1]
[08:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: vala-panel-appmenu (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.6.94+repack1-0ubuntu1 => 0.6.94+repack1-1] (ubuntu-mate) (sync)
[08:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mate-tweak (bionic-proposed/universe) [18.04.16-0ubuntu1 => 18.04.16-1] (ubuntu-mate) (sync)
[08:20] <slangasek> infinity: LP: #1766513
[08:20] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 1766513 in ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) "RM: pkg-create-dbgsym: obsolete, debhelper conflicts" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1766513
[08:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-raspi2 [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.15.0-1010.11] (kernel)
[08:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mate-window-applets (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.5.1-1 => 1.5.1-2] (ubuntu-mate) (sync)
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mate-dock-applet (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.85-0ubuntu1 => 0.85-1] (ubuntu-mate) (sync)
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-raspi2 [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.15.0-1010.11] (kernel)
[08:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mate-optimus (bionic-proposed/universe) [18.04.0-0ubuntu1 => 18.04.0-1] (ubuntu-mate) (sync)
[08:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: handbrake (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.0+ds1-1 => 1.1.0+ds1-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[08:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted handbrake [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.0+ds1-1ubuntu1]
[08:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-gcp [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1006.6]
[08:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-meta-gcp [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0.1006.8]
[08:41] <doko> update_excuses/update_output isn't updated
[08:44] <sil2100> britney is still running from what I see in the logs
[08:44] <sil2100> But should slowly finish
[08:45] <slangasek> there was a 3h gap.  perhaps there's a bug in britney that causes it not to run if there are no archive updates?
[08:46] <apw> slangasek, iirc it runs if the archive changes or there is 'Test in progress' in there
[08:47] <slangasek> right; so the fact that it had published shim-signed+libabigail and the release pocket updated was not a reason for p-m to run again
[08:57] <slangasek> actually it looks like the archive wasn't updating
[08:57] <slangasek> shim-signed only published 23m ago
[08:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-kvm (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1007.7 => 4.15.0-1008.8] (kernel)
[08:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-meta-kvm (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0.1007.7 => 4.15.0.1008.8] (kernel)
[09:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-raspi2 [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1010.11]
[09:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-raspi2 [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1010.11]
[09:00] <LocutusOfBorg> infinity, do you like hedgewars now?
[09:01] <infinity> LocutusOfBorg: It's the best thing ever.
[09:01] <LocutusOfBorg> please give the game a shot :)
[09:02] <LocutusOfBorg> but not too much, I don't want to be blamed if bionic gets delayed because of people playing too much :)
[09:03] <sil2100> I'd play it if it was beaverwars
[09:03] <sil2100> With a bionic addon
[09:04] <LocutusOfBorg> I should probably ask ubuntu developers to give me their faces, and create an hedgewars ubuntu team with us as "hogs" :)
[09:12] <ginggs> can src:libthrust be removed? LP: #1766109
[09:12] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 1766109 in libthrust (Ubuntu) "Please remove src:libthrust from bionic" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1766109
[09:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libvirt (bionic-proposed/main) [4.0.0-1ubuntu7 => 4.0.0-1ubuntu8] (ubuntu-server, virt)
[09:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-kvm [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1008.8]
[09:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-meta-kvm [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0.1008.8]
[09:25] <sil2100> hm, I don't see proposed-migration running again, although I'd expect it to tick because of -kvm accepted
[09:28] <apw> doesn't it have to publish first?
[09:28] <apw> those are 'pending' still not published
[09:30] <sil2100> Yeah, I guess you're right
[09:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-oem (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.15.0-1002.3 => 4.15.0-1004.5] (kernel)
[09:31] <tjaalton> apw: ^
[09:31] <tjaalton> or sil2100
[09:32] <sil2100> Oh noes, another one
[09:32] <tjaalton> :P
[09:33] <sil2100> No -meta?
[09:33] <tjaalton> soon
[09:34] <tjaalton> hmm, reject meta :)
[09:35] <sil2100> apw: I'll take that so you can work on some more good stuff
[09:36]  * sil2100 doesn't see any -meta in the queue
[09:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-meta-oem (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.15.0.1002.3 => 4.15.0.1004.2] (kernel)
[09:38] <tjaalton> I've now uploaded two, drop the older one
[09:38] <tjaalton> hmm signed will take some time.. and I need to lunch first
[09:39] <sil2100> Wow, this is actually quite a diff
[09:39] <tjaalton> which one?
[09:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mate-desktop-environment (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.20.0+3ubuntu2 => 1.20.0+4] (ubuntu-mate) (sync)
[09:40] <sil2100> Just talking to myself about the -oem itself, lots of versions pulled in
[09:42] <tjaalton> yes, rebase included changes after -17
[09:44] <cjwatson> slangasek: 3h gap was the daily apt-ftparchive clean precessing its way around the way
[09:44] <cjwatson> *around the day
[09:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-kvm [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1008.8] (kernel)
[09:55] <sil2100> tjaalton: hm, no -v needed for -oem? Since I see the last version in bionic was 1002.3
[09:56] <sil2100> tjaalton: and the new linux-oem is 1003.4 and 1004.5, while the .changes file only includes changes from 1004.5
[09:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-gcp [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1006.6] (kernel)
[09:56] <tjaalton> sil2100: maybe, i can add that
[09:57] <tjaalton> oh
[09:57] <tjaalton> ah, right
[09:58] <sil2100> tjaalton: btw. I also see only one -meta in the queue ;p Is that the 'correct' meta package?
[09:59] <tjaalton> reject both, i'll check again after lunch
[09:59] <sil2100> tjaalton: ok, thanks o/
[10:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected linux-meta-oem [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0.1004.2]
[10:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected linux-oem [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1004.5]
[10:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-aws (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1006.6 => 4.15.0-1007.7] (kernel, ubuntu-budgie)
[10:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-meta-aws (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0.1006.6 => 4.15.0.1007.7] (kernel, ubuntu-budgie)
[10:14] <sil2100> Reviewing linux-aws ^
[10:17] <apw> sil2100, those are in the ubuntu-budgie set ?
[10:19] <sil2100> hm, interesting, I didn't expect that - wonder how it's in daily-live
[10:22] <tjaalton> sil2100: actually, since linux-oem hasn't made it to bionic release yet, I'll just add the whole changes since the first release
[10:23] <sil2100> tjaalton: it didn'
[10:23] <sil2100> eh, premature enter
[10:23] <sil2100> tjaalton: it didn't get to release? I see 4.15.0-1002.3 linux-oem in the release pocket
[10:24] <sil2100> Or am I missing coffee again
[10:24] <tjaalton> oh
[10:24] <tjaalton> I thought it was still in proposed
[10:24] <tjaalton> ah, released yesterday
[10:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-oem (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.15.0-1002.3 => 4.15.0-1004.5] (kernel)
[10:30] <sil2100> apw: ok, I'm digging but I fail to see how linux-tools-aws is pulled in, but there's quite some germinate logs to browse - that being said, since we'll be re-spinning anyway and the changes should not affect linux-tools-aws, should be all good
[10:38] <sil2100> apw: anyway, it looks good to me so I'll accept it if you have nothing against it
[10:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[10:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-aws [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1007.7]
[10:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-meta-aws [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0.1007.7]
[10:55] <doko> LocutusOfBorg: hedgewars ftbfs on arm64 and ppc64el
[10:55] <rbalint> Laney: how about i reupload the modemmanager and libqmi packages with the current fix or the desktop team fixes it in the way they please before the release because they currently ftbfs?
[10:56] <LocutusOfBorg> doko, remove ppc64el binaries should have been done by infinity some hours ago?
[10:57] <LocutusOfBorg> arm64 is building correctly
[10:57] <LocutusOfBorg> (update excuses/publisher slowliness)
[10:57] <LocutusOfBorg> please just kick ppc64el out as I did in debian
[10:57] <LocutusOfBorg> and please kick source casablanca out too, now it is named cpprest
[10:57] <LocutusOfBorg> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/casablanca/+bug/1765630 and  https://launchpad.net/bugs/1765392
[10:57] <ubot5`> Ubuntu bug 1765630 in casablanca (Ubuntu) "remove casablanca from bionic." [Undecided,New]
[10:57] <ubot5`> Ubuntu bug 1765392 in hedgewars (Ubuntu) "please remove hedgewars on ppc64el" [Undecided,New]
[10:58] <cpaelzer> otherwise not worth to mention until reporter clarified, but since it is release weel - has anybody seen things like bug 1765844 ?
[10:58] <ubot5`> bug 1765844 in openssh (Ubuntu) "openssh private key exposed due to change in permissions" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1765844
[10:58] <Laney> rbalint: Feel free to leave them if you don't want to turn off -Werror for some reason.
[11:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libqmi (bionic-proposed/main) [1.18.0-3 => 1.18.0-3ubuntu1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[11:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-mate-meta (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.224 => 1.225] (ubuntu-mate)
[11:07] <sil2100> tjaalton: ok, re-checking -oem - remember about the -meta and -signed packages
[11:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-mate-meta [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.225]
[11:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-meta-oem (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.15.0.1002.3 => 4.15.0.1004.2] (kernel)
[11:12] <tjaalton> sil2100: yep, meta uploaded, signed needs some work still
[11:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-dev-tools (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.162 => 0.163] (no packageset)
[11:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-dev-tools [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.163]
[11:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-azure (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1008.8 => 4.15.0-1009.9] (kernel)
[11:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-signed-azure (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1008.8 => 4.15.0-1009.9] (kernel)
[11:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-meta-azure (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0.1008.8 => 4.15.0.1009.9] (kernel)
[11:31] <sil2100> tjaalton: I'm a noob, but just curious - what's with that =SIGN-ME-TXT= thingies in the control stub?
[11:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-dev-tools (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.162 => 0.164] (no packageset)
[11:33] <sil2100> Anyway, let me get back to this after lunch, but it mostly looks fine
[11:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-dev-tools [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.164]
[11:33] <sil2100> I'll take care of azure as well
[11:34] <tjaalton> sil2100: copied from debian.master, ask apw :)
[11:34] <cascardo> sil2100: they come from the master kernel, they are replaced by the rules with either unsigned or signed (or there's no signed anymore)
[11:35] <apw> sil2100, right that is either the words "signed" or "unsigned" as we only have a linux-image-unsigned on platforms that sign
[11:35] <cascardo> should be on debian/scripts/control-create
[11:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: modemmanager (bionic-proposed/main) [1.6.8-2 => 1.6.8-2ubuntu1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[11:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-signed-oem (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.15.0-1002.3 => 4.15.0-1004.5] (kernel)
[11:39] <sil2100> Funky!
[11:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libvirt [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.0.0-1ubuntu8]
[11:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted appmenu-gtk-module [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.6.94-1]
[11:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mate-dock-applet [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.85-1]
[11:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mate-tweak [sync] (bionic-proposed) [18.04.16-1]
[11:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted vala-panel-appmenu [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.6.94+repack1-1]
[11:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mate-desktop-environment [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.20.0+4]
[11:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mate-window-applets [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.5.1-2]
[11:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mate-optimus [sync] (bionic-proposed) [18.04.0-1]
[11:44] <rbalint> Laney: by leave them you mean leave them setting the api levels or leave them ftbfs?
[11:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-meta-oem [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0.1004.2]
[11:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-oem [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1004.5]
[11:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zlib (trusty-proposed/main) [1:1.2.8.dfsg-1ubuntu1 => 1:1.2.8.dfsg-1ubuntu1.1] (core)
[11:51] <doko> Laney: the arm64 autopkg testers don't seem to be happy
[11:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libqmi (bionic-proposed/main) [1.18.0-3 => 1.18.0-3ubuntu1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[11:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: modemmanager (bionic-proposed/main) [1.6.8-2 => 1.6.8-2ubuntu1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[11:56] <Laney> doko: can you please be a bit more verbose?
[11:56] <rbalint> Laney: in case meant leave it ftbfs then please reject my uploads
[11:57] <Laney> rbalint: I meant 'leave it alone'
[11:57] <Laney> but I just fixed it differently. :-)
[11:57] <Laney> thanks for bringing it to our awareness
[11:59] <doko> Laney: all tests fail, running against an unknown version
[11:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected libqmi [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.18.0-3ubuntu1]
[11:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected modemmanager [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.6.8-2ubuntu1]
[12:00] <Laney> thanks
[12:01] <Laney> doko: Adam's going to look :D
[12:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libqmi [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.18.0-3ubuntu1]
[12:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted modemmanager [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.6.8-2ubuntu1]
[12:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [armhf] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:17] <LocutusOfBorg> http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/b/budgie-desktop/bionic/arm64
[12:17] <LocutusOfBorg> arm64 sadness?
[12:17] <infinity> LocutusOfBorg: Yes.
[12:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:31] <apw> ^^ ?
[12:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:54] <LocutusOfBorg> infinity, I did remove the binary for hedgewars in proposed, but something is preventing it from migration (should it still get kicked from release too?)
[12:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:55] <acheronuk> o_O
[12:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: samba (bionic-proposed/main) [2:4.7.6+dfsg~ubuntu-0ubuntu1 => 2:4.7.6+dfsg~ubuntu-0ubuntu2] (core)
[12:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: samba (bionic-proposed/main) [2:4.7.6+dfsg~ubuntu-0ubuntu1 => 2:4.7.6+dfsg~ubuntu-0ubuntu2] (core)
[12:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: samba (bionic-proposed/main) [2:4.7.6+dfsg~ubuntu-0ubuntu1 => 2:4.7.6+dfsg~ubuntu-0ubuntu2] (core)
[12:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: samba (bionic-proposed/main) [2:4.7.6+dfsg~ubuntu-0ubuntu1 => 2:4.7.6+dfsg~ubuntu-0ubuntu2] (core)
[12:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: samba (bionic-proposed/main) [2:4.7.6+dfsg~ubuntu-0ubuntu1 => 2:4.7.6+dfsg~ubuntu-0ubuntu2] (core)
[12:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[12:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: samba (bionic-proposed/main) [2:4.7.6+dfsg~ubuntu-0ubuntu1 => 2:4.7.6+dfsg~ubuntu-0ubuntu2] (core)
[13:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: samba (bionic-proposed/main) [2:4.7.6+dfsg~ubuntu-0ubuntu1 => 2:4.7.6+dfsg~ubuntu-0ubuntu2] (core)
[13:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: samba (bionic-proposed/main) [2:4.7.6+dfsg~ubuntu-0ubuntu1 => 2:4.7.6+dfsg~ubuntu-0ubuntu2] (core)
[13:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: samba (bionic-proposed/main) [2:4.7.6+dfsg~ubuntu-0ubuntu1 => 2:4.7.6+dfsg~ubuntu-0ubuntu2] (core)
[13:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: samba (bionic-proposed/main) [2:4.7.6+dfsg~ubuntu-0ubuntu1 => 2:4.7.6+dfsg~ubuntu-0ubuntu2] (core)
[13:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: samba (bionic-proposed/main) [2:4.7.6+dfsg~ubuntu-0ubuntu1 => 2:4.7.6+dfsg~ubuntu-0ubuntu2] (core)
[13:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: samba (bionic-proposed/main) [2:4.7.6+dfsg~ubuntu-0ubuntu1 => 2:4.7.6+dfsg~ubuntu-0ubuntu2] (core)
[13:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: samba (bionic-proposed/main) [2:4.7.6+dfsg~ubuntu-0ubuntu1 => 2:4.7.6+dfsg~ubuntu-0ubuntu2] (core)
[13:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: samba (bionic-proposed/main) [2:4.7.6+dfsg~ubuntu-0ubuntu1 => 2:4.7.6+dfsg~ubuntu-0ubuntu2] (core)
[13:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: samba (bionic-proposed/main) [2:4.7.6+dfsg~ubuntu-0ubuntu1 => 2:4.7.6+dfsg~ubuntu-0ubuntu2] (core)
[13:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: samba (bionic-proposed/main) [2:4.7.6+dfsg~ubuntu-0ubuntu1 => 2:4.7.6+dfsg~ubuntu-0ubuntu2] (core)
[13:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: samba (bionic-proposed/main) [2:4.7.6+dfsg~ubuntu-0ubuntu1 => 2:4.7.6+dfsg~ubuntu-0ubuntu2] (core)
[13:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: samba (bionic-proposed/main) [2:4.7.6+dfsg~ubuntu-0ubuntu1 => 2:4.7.6+dfsg~ubuntu-0ubuntu2] (core)
[13:06] <doko> infinity, slangasek, Laney: ^^^
[13:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: samba (bionic-proposed/main) [2:4.7.6+dfsg~ubuntu-0ubuntu1 => 2:4.7.6+dfsg~ubuntu-0ubuntu2] (core)
[13:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: samba (bionic-proposed/main) [2:4.7.6+dfsg~ubuntu-0ubuntu1 => 2:4.7.6+dfsg~ubuntu-0ubuntu2] (core)
[13:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: samba (bionic-proposed/main) [2:4.7.6+dfsg~ubuntu-0ubuntu1 => 2:4.7.6+dfsg~ubuntu-0ubuntu2] (core)
[13:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: samba (bionic-proposed/main) [2:4.7.6+dfsg~ubuntu-0ubuntu1 => 2:4.7.6+dfsg~ubuntu-0ubuntu2] (core)
[13:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: samba (bionic-proposed/main) [2:4.7.6+dfsg~ubuntu-0ubuntu1 => 2:4.7.6+dfsg~ubuntu-0ubuntu2] (core)
[13:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: samba (bionic-proposed/main) [2:4.7.6+dfsg~ubuntu-0ubuntu1 => 2:4.7.6+dfsg~ubuntu-0ubuntu2] (core)
[13:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-aws [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1007.7] (kernel, ubuntu-budgie)
[13:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-aws [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1007.7] (kernel, ubuntu-budgie)
[13:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-aws [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1007.7] (kernel, ubuntu-budgie)
[13:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-aws [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1007.7] (kernel, ubuntu-budgie)
[13:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-aws [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1007.7] (kernel, ubuntu-budgie)
[13:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-aws [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1007.7] (kernel, ubuntu-budgie)
[13:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-aws [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1007.7] (kernel, ubuntu-budgie)
[13:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-aws [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1007.7] (kernel, ubuntu-budgie)
[13:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-aws [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1007.7] (kernel, ubuntu-budgie)
[13:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-aws [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1007.7] (kernel, ubuntu-budgie)
[13:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-aws [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1007.7] (kernel, ubuntu-budgie)
[13:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-aws [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1007.7] (kernel, ubuntu-budgie)
[13:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-aws [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1007.7] (kernel, ubuntu-budgie)
[13:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-aws [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1007.7] (kernel, ubuntu-budgie)
[13:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-aws [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1007.7] (kernel, ubuntu-budgie)
[13:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-aws [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1007.7] (kernel, ubuntu-budgie)
[13:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-aws [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1007.7] (kernel, ubuntu-budgie)
[13:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-aws [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1007.7] (kernel, ubuntu-budgie)
[13:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-aws [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1007.7] (kernel, ubuntu-budgie)
[13:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-aws [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1007.7] (kernel, ubuntu-budgie)
[13:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-aws [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1007.7] (kernel, ubuntu-budgie)
[13:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-aws [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1007.7] (kernel, ubuntu-budgie)
[13:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-aws [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1007.7] (kernel, ubuntu-budgie)
[13:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-aws [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1007.7] (kernel, ubuntu-budgie)
[13:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-aws [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1007.7] (kernel, ubuntu-budgie)
[13:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-aws [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1007.7] (kernel, ubuntu-budgie)
[13:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-aws [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1007.7] (kernel, ubuntu-budgie)
[13:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-aws [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1007.7] (kernel, ubuntu-budgie)
[13:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-aws [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1007.7] (kernel, ubuntu-budgie)
[13:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:32] <infinity> stgraber: Hey, where does queuebot live and how do we shoot it?
[13:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-aws [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1007.7] (kernel, ubuntu-budgie)
[13:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-aws [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1007.7] (kernel, ubuntu-budgie)
[13:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
 I'm at soup!
[13:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-aws [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1007.7] (kernel, ubuntu-budgie)
[13:33] <acheronuk> lol
[13:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[13:34]  * sil2100 gets back to reviewing the kernels
[13:34] <cjwatson> ... that didn't work
[13:34] <cjwatson> stgraber: ^- please get it to rejoin once it's happier with life
[13:35] <LocutusOfBorg> cjwatson, maybe this is a network issue, but since the quiet I didn't see any queuebot message
[13:35] <cjwatson> I saw three
[13:35] <acheronuk> I saw none
[13:35]  * cjwatson shrugs
[13:35] <LocutusOfBorg> https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/4ypzzrFwvS/
[13:35] <cjwatson> don't care
[13:35] <LocutusOfBorg> me neither
[13:36] <cjwatson> kicking means rejoining is self-service once stgraber fixes it, so arguably better anyway
[13:36] <acheronuk> don't disagree with that!
[13:36] <LocutusOfBorg> yep this is true, thanks for stopping it!
[13:42] <Kamilion> Well, since we've got a lull then, I guess I'll take a moment to say thank you to everyone.
[14:00] <bdmurray> sil2100: Could we release update-notifier in artful early?
[14:08] <sil2100> bdmurray: ah, it's the update notification check not working? It would make sense to get that released before bionic
[14:09] <bdmurray> sil2100: yeah, that'd be good
[14:09] <bdmurray> otherwise the people will come with pitchforks
[14:10] <sil2100> bdmurray: you think it was around for enough or should we wait for tomorrow still? I can't remember how big the change was
[14:10] <sil2100> But I think I remember it was basically re-adding removed code, right?
[14:12] <bdmurray> sil2100: yes, it just adds code that was removed some time ago. We could wait for another day, I don't mind either way.
[14:16] <seb128> can gnome-shell be made to migrate despite the arm64 tests being in a weird state?
[14:16] <seb128> seems like more an infra issue than a g-s one
[14:17] <stgraber> lets see if it's happier. it didn't like something it got from Launchpad apparently
[14:18] <sil2100> bdmurray: I'd give it this one more day just to be sure and publish it tomorrow in the morning, still leaving some time in case things explode
[14:19] <bdmurray> sil2100: okey dokey
[14:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: flash-kernel (bionic-proposed/main) [3.90ubuntu1 => 3.90ubuntu2] (core)
[14:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rsyslog (bionic-proposed/main) [8.32.0-1ubuntu3 => 8.32.0-1ubuntu4] (core)
[14:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted flash-kernel [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.90ubuntu2]
[14:35] <cjwatson> stgraber: thanks
[14:37] <cjwatson> seb128: infinity's working on that arm64 failure
[14:37] <seb128> cjwatson, thx
[14:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted samba [source] (bionic-proposed) [2:4.7.6+dfsg~ubuntu-0ubuntu2]
[15:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-meta (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0.20.21 => 4.15.0.20.22] (core, kernel)
[15:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-mate-artwork (bionic-proposed/universe) [18.04.10 => 18.04.11] (ubuntu-mate)
[15:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-meta [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0.20.22]
[15:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity (bionic-proposed/main) [18.04.10 => 18.04.11] (core)
[15:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mate-desktop (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.20.1-1ubuntu2 => 1.20.1-2ubuntu1] (ubuntu-mate, ubuntukylin, xubuntu)
[15:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rsyslog (bionic-proposed/main) [8.32.0-1ubuntu3 => 8.32.0-1ubuntu4] (core)
[15:26] <xnox> jdstrand, this ^ rsyslog has your and mine fix in it.
[15:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mate-settings-daemon (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.20.1-2ubuntu1 => 1.20.1-3] (ubuntu-mate) (sync)
[15:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity (bionic-proposed/main) [18.04.10 => 18.04.11] (core)
[15:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubiquity [source] (bionic-proposed) [18.04.11]
[15:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dcontainers (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.8.0~alpha.5-2 => 0.8.0~alpha.6-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[15:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dcontainers [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.8.0~alpha.6-1]
[15:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected rsyslog [source] (bionic-proposed) [8.32.0-1ubuntu4]
[15:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mate-settings-daemon [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.20.1-3]
[15:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rsyslog [source] (bionic-proposed) [8.32.0-1ubuntu4]
[15:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-meta (bionic-release/main) [4.15.0.20.22 => 4.15.0.19.21] (core, kernel) (sync)
[15:42] <jdstrand> xnox: ack, thanks for incorporating my changes into your upload
[15:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-meta [sync] (bionic-release) [4.15.0.19.21]
[15:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubiquity [source] (bionic-proposed) [18.04.11]
[15:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-mate-artwork [source] (bionic-proposed) [18.04.11]
[15:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mate-desktop [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.20.1-2ubuntu1]
[16:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: juju-core (xenial-proposed/main) [2.3.2-0ubuntu0.16.04.1 => 2.3.7-0ubuntu0.16.04.1] (ubuntu-server)
[16:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-azure [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1009.9] (kernel)
[16:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-azure [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1009.9] (kernel)
[16:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-azure [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1009.9] (kernel)
[16:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: base-files (bionic-proposed/main) [10.1ubuntu1 => 10.1ubuntu2] (core)
[16:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-azure [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1009.9] (kernel)
[16:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-azure [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1009.9] (kernel)
[16:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-azure [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1009.9] (kernel)
[16:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-azure [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1009.9] (kernel)
[16:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-azure [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1009.9] (kernel)
[16:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-azure [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1009.9] (kernel)
[16:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-azure [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1009.9] (kernel)
[16:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-azure [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1009.9] (kernel)
[16:20] <nacc> stgraber: cjwatson: --^ did it happen again?
[16:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-azure [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1009.9] (kernel)
[16:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-azure [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1009.9] (kernel)
[16:22] <nacc> thanks
[16:22] <cjwatson> stgraber: over to you
[16:22] <sil2100> stgraber: I can just accept those NEW binaries to make it stop, but maybe you want those in for debugging?
[16:22] <sil2100> stgraber: or can I just proceed and accept?
[16:25] <stgraber> crap
[16:25] <stgraber> wth is going on
[16:26] <stgraber> No such source package: 'linux-azure_4.15.0-1009.9_amd64.tar.gz'.
[16:26] <stgraber> that seems reasonable, why does it try that as a source package name
[16:32] <LocutusOfBorg> please let cmake in from unapproved queue, fixing ceph rebuilds
[16:32] <LocutusOfBorg> tdaitx, ^^
[16:33] <stgraber> ah, the "signing" type is the problem, queuebot doesn't know about that yet, it only knows about "uefi"
[16:34] <cyphermox> hah
[16:34] <stgraber> cjwatson: is that new? (arch=signing)
[16:35] <stgraber> anyway, it should now to treat that as if arch=uefi now
[16:36] <infinity> tjaalton: Is there a reason linux-oem needs to produce udebs?
[16:37] <cjwatson> stgraber: Not super-new - about two years ago
[16:37] <cjwatson> stgraber: But maybe things have been using the uefi alias
[16:37] <cyphermox> uefi yep
[16:37] <cjwatson> And yeah, treating it like uefi is correct
[16:38] <cyphermox> maybe signing was used now for the kernel changes to always get the signed copies installed
[16:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-azure [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1009.9]
[16:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-oem [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1004.5]
[16:40] <xnox> slangasek, willcooke - i believe ifupdown should not be in Ubuntu Desktop; and neither should be pppoeconf pulled in; given that NetworkManager can do ppp configs, and ppp is installed.
[16:40] <slangasek> cyphermox: it was moved to signing as part of turning up support for ppc64el signed kernels
[16:41] <cyphermox> slangasek: ah
[16:41] <cyphermox> slangasek: fyi, shim-signed in queue.
[16:41] <slangasek> cyphermox: ack
[16:41]  * cyphermox cries
[16:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cmake [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.10.2-1ubuntu2]
[16:41] <slangasek> xnox: too late for us to be cleaning things out of seeds for 18.04
[16:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted shim-signed [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.34.8]
[16:42] <xnox> slangasek, it's on the live system, enables networkigng wait-online, which is wrong....
[16:43] <willcooke> xnox, NM does ppp vpns, but pppoeconf is used for more than just VPNs.  But not sure it should be installed by default any more, it feels a bit anachronistic. ifupdown, I can't think of anything that needs it, probably a hangover.  Can we drop it next cycle and see, or do you want it gone now?
[16:43] <slangasek> xnox: more than the live system, I see it's part of the ubuntu-desktop seed
[16:44] <willcooke> oh, yeah, what slangasek said
[16:44] <slangasek> willcooke: pppoeconf depends on ifupdown and pulls it in, xnox is suggesting that causes issues for the live image
[16:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted base-files [source] (bionic-proposed) [10.1ubuntu2]
[16:44] <slangasek> the basic principle is that you should have everything you need to get online and get further software... pppoeconf is still needed for some cases of "get online" and I don't think we have time to move it into a "present but not installed by default" configuration that won't be terrible
[16:45] <willcooke> right, yeah, I've first hand experience of needing pppoeconf this week
[16:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-firmware (artful-proposed/main) [1.169.3 => 1.169.4] (core, kernel)
[16:51] <slangasek> xnox: is there something else we should be giving ifupdown so that it's not interfering with wait-online?
[16:55] <xnox> slangasek, we could add a generator, which would check/parse e-n-i and not enable networking.service wanted-by network-online.target.....
[16:56] <slangasek> xnox: where the parsing should be as simple as grep -rqE '^[[:space:]]*(auto|allow-hotplug)\b' /etc/network/interfaces /etc/network/interfaces.d ?
[16:56] <slangasek> or possibly only the 'auto'
[17:01] <mdeslaur> is it too late to get a packagekit security fix in?
[17:01] <infinity> mdeslaur: No, but almost.
[17:01] <mdeslaur> infinity: thanks, I'll upload in a minute
[17:02] <cyphermox> slangasek: willcooke: pppoeconf is used to make the weird DSL-based + VPN setups for some Russian ISP
[17:02] <cyphermox> most PPPoE actually already works with NM
[17:02] <willcooke> cyphermox, and VDSL in the UK
[17:03] <infinity> willcooke: Russia, UK, same same.
[17:03] <infinity> willcooke: You both hate Europe.
[17:03] <willcooke> XD
[17:04] <cyphermox> heh
[17:06] <cyphermox> slangasek: infinity: incoming livecd-rootfs for some cloud images failing to build
[17:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (bionic-proposed/main) [2.524 => 2.525] (desktop-core)
[17:08] <slangasek> cyphermox: I'm not happy with shim-signed 1.34.8 (which I did not review; someone had accepted it before you even commented about it being in the queue).  We are only supposed to have been triggered if there is a dkms module requiring the key to be added in mok.  Ignoring all errors from --enroll-key means silently ignoring failures to prompt the user for passwords
[17:08] <slangasek> cyphermox: did you add this as a workaround to recover users that had already gotten wedged because of a failing trigger?
[17:09] <cyphermox> slangasek: it's for https://launchpadlibrarian.net/367147329/DpkgTerminalLog.txt
[17:09] <cyphermox> argh
[17:09] <cyphermox> bug 1766627
[17:09] <ubot5`> bug 1766627 in shim-signed (Ubuntu) "package shim-signed 1.34.7+13-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: installed shim-signed package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1766627
[17:10] <xnox> infinity, cyphermox - most fibre-to-home connections.
[17:10] <slangasek> I know that's the linked bug; I want to understand why ignoring all errors is the right size hammer for something that looks to me should have been fixed on the triggering side
[17:10] <xnox> but we want it via NM, not via ifupdown. Ubuntu desktop user unlikely to manage ifupdwon ppp by themselves.
[17:11] <cyphermox> slangasek: seriously, way too many conflicting requirements. I did think of checking if a .key file existed, and did ||: instead, I didn't think of the failure to prompt
[17:12] <cyphermox> the only thing that /should/ be triggering is dkms, but if you didn't update dkms, and update shim-signed, then you'd potentially run into this issue
[17:12] <slangasek> cyphermox: do you know why shim-signed was triggered at all in that bug report? dpkg logs show none of the usual suspects (dkms|nvidia|bcmwl|virtualbox)
[17:13] <slangasek> it was a dist-upgrade, so there was no previous bionic version of dkms present that could have triggered it
[17:15] <cyphermox> slangasek: there is nothing except dkms that should trigger, and all the calls in shim-signed are SHIM_NOTRIGGER=y
[17:15] <slangasek> indeed
[17:15] <slangasek> so I don't think we've understood this bug report
[17:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: packagekit (bionic-proposed/main) [1.1.9-1ubuntu1 => 1.1.9-1ubuntu2] (desktop-core)
[17:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.525]
[17:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted packagekit [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.9-1ubuntu2]
[17:19] <xnox> willcooke, when you say it hang on shutdown..... did you press enter?
[17:19] <xnox> bah
[17:19] <xnox> wrong channel
[17:21] <slangasek> cyphermox: grub-efi-amd64 is triggering shim-signed.
[17:22] <cyphermox> oh, so it is
[17:22] <cyphermox> this needs to go
[17:22] <slangasek> cyphermox: do you remember why this is there?  added Oct 2016, "to make sure users can disable shim validation if necessary"
[17:23] <slangasek> are we sure it needs to go? and is that the right path for us to fix this properly for release?  a grub rebuild is not as quick to turn around
[17:23] <cyphermox> IIRC to make sure on upgrade validation was disabled if there were dkms modules installed already
[17:24] <slangasek> ok, so this is now redundant with the code in shim-signed and dkms?
[17:24] <cyphermox> slangasek: my immediate fix is to revert that change I did
[17:24] <slangasek> grub takes time to build and be published.
[17:24] <slangasek> 2h minimum if we go this route
[17:25] <cyphermox> yeah, I know
[17:25] <cyphermox> I'm saying *not grub*
[17:25] <tjaalton> infinity: I'm not sure, are those used only on server images?
[17:25] <slangasek> cyphermox: ok, I really don't understand what you're saying.  "revert that change" - which change?
[17:26] <cyphermox> shim-signed
[17:26] <cyphermox> which should appear incessantly
[17:26] <slangasek> reverting that change will reintroduce the bug
[17:26] <infinity> tjaalton: d-i images, to be exact.  But yes, that's server and netboot.  *I* build neither of those with your kernel.  I have no idea what you do with it.
[17:26] <slangasek> which is caused by grub triggering when it shouldn't
[17:26] <cyphermox> slangasek: just look at the shim-signed in queue :)
[17:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim-signed (bionic-proposed/main) [1.34.7 => 1.34.9] (core)
[17:27] <slangasek> cyphermox: ok - not a revert but an amendment.  Check.
[17:27] <tjaalton> infinity: there's talk of using bionic oem on a vendor server image..
[17:27] <cyphermox> sorry, it was after to upload than to amend the communication.
[17:27] <infinity> tjaalton: Gross.
[17:27] <cyphermox> *faster
[17:27] <slangasek> :)
[17:27] <infinity> tjaalton: Is there talk of us actually supporting it, then?  Should it be in main?
[17:28] <cyphermox> now I really want shim and all things secureboot to die
[17:28] <tjaalton> infinity: is it in main in xenial?
[17:28] <cyphermox> slangasek: to say as someone else said earlier, can we remove dkms completely?
[17:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted shim-signed [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.34.9]
[17:28] <infinity> tjaalton: It's in universe in all releases.
[17:29] <slangasek> cyphermox: should 1766637 and 1766338 be duped to 1766627, which is the bug you referenced in your changelog?
[17:29] <cyphermox> possibly, last I checked ..27 was the newest.
[17:30] <tjaalton> infinity: AIUI it's going to be supported for 5y in bionic
[17:30] <infinity> tjaalton: By whom?  Is there a formal commitment for this?  A contingency plan if we give up early (ie: make the oem meta point back to generic)?
[17:32] <tjaalton> that would be one option, or point to the next lts backport
[17:33] <cyphermox> slangasek: bug mangling done.
[17:33] <slangasek> cyphermox: thanks
[17:34] <infinity> tjaalton: Right, whatever oem is based on at the time, I guess.
[17:34] <slangasek> infinity: are you in the loop on xnox's proposal to make changes to the ubuntu-desktop seed today?
[17:34] <infinity> tjaalton: If there's a formal commitment to maintain it and move to a kernel team kernel as soon as you decide to stop maintaining it, I'm happy to promote it.
[17:35] <infinity> slangasek: If by "in the loop", you mean "in agreement", I am not.
[17:35] <slangasek> infinity: is that why he's assigning the bug to me instead of to you?
[17:35] <infinity> slangasek: It may well be that he's trying to pull a fast one.
[17:35] <infinity> xnox: Are you trying to pull a fast one?
[17:36] <tjaalton> infinity: right, so keep it in universe for now. I think some details are still undecided
[17:39] <xnox> infinity, slangasek - i believe it is wrong to ship unused ifupdown by default; and it is lack of seeds review prior to the release that led to this situation. It is wrong to install ifupdown by default on all desktops, when it is not to be used.
[17:39] <xnox> infinity, slangasek - not pulling a fast one, asking for architect review & product owner, prior to uploading things for release team review.
[17:40] <slangasek> xnox: my point is, don't route around infinity who is the primary gatekeeper of changes at this point in the release cycle
[17:40] <infinity> tjaalton: "For now"... I mean, release is in under two days, and I'd like the release pocket to represent our intent here.  It doesn't have to, but it would be nice.
[17:40] <slangasek> xnox: do I agree ifupdown should be dropped: ideally yes
[17:40] <slangasek> xnox: do I think we can drop it without impacting some users' ability to run Ubuntu: no
[17:40] <xnox> slangasek, on new installs of bionic?!
[17:40] <xnox> slangasek, it's not like it's removed from the archive.
[17:40] <xnox> _desktop_
[17:40] <tjaalton> infinity: well I don't know, I'm asking others what to do with it
[17:41] <slangasek> xnox: how do they get it if they're not online because they don't have pppoeconf?
[17:41] <slangasek> infinity: how's the arm64 un-breaking going?  quick glance tells me that we might have something unhappy with the new kernel packaging vs flash-kernel?
[17:41] <slangasek> xnox: are you telling me "no one needs pppoeconf anymore", or are you telling me "we don't care about this use case"?
[17:43] <slangasek> xnox: yes, it sucks to have this in 18.04 GA.  But GA-1.5days is not the time to be making these changes and I think we just have to eat it.
[17:44] <infinity> slangasek: Should be unstuck.
[17:44] <slangasek> infinity: ok.  so I should mash test retry buttons, or you already have?
[17:44] <infinity> slangasek: Still considering a better fix to flash-kernel, but the current adt backlog is resolving.
[17:44] <infinity> slangasek: Already mashed.
[17:44] <slangasek> ok
[17:44] <slangasek> infinity: any reason not to force-skiptest them all, regardless?
[17:44] <xnox> willcooke, i believe asserting that one needs pppoeconf to get to the internet (meaning the ISP pppoe stuff, not VPN stuff) is configurable via NM.
[17:44] <slangasek> are we still waiting for other things that will arrive later?
[17:45] <xnox> willcooke, it is also true if you use ppoeconf, it doesn't mean that you for that to use ifupdown.
[17:45] <xnox> willcooke, and certainly neither should be enabled & pre-installed in the livefs
[17:45] <xnox> willcooke, it should be shipped in the pool/ then
[17:46] <slangasek> xnox: do we ship other things in pool/ besides things that are auto-installed by ubiquity based on hardware detection?
[17:48] <slangasek> xnox: current desktop pool contents for reference: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/XCcg9RkRNJ/
[17:50] <slangasek> xnox, infinity, willcooke: I am convinced it would be consistent with our other usage of the ship-live seed to move pppoeconf to ship-live (the on-ISO package pool) and drop it from ubuntu-desktop.  Whether this is an ok time to make that change, I defer to infinity
[17:51] <infinity> slangasek: We also have no idea if that will fix the bug being investigated.
[17:52] <slangasek> infinity: I don't know details on what's being investigated, xnox was thin on details there.  I think it's right on its face that we didn't want ifupdown in the default desktop for 18.04
[17:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: hedgewars (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.9.24.1-dfsg-1ubuntu1 => 0.9.24.1-dfsg-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[17:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xchat (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.8.8-14 => 2.8.8-15] (no packageset) (sync)
[17:53] <infinity> slangasek: Sure, I don't disagree with that, except for timing and testing.
[17:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted hedgewars [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.9.24.1-dfsg-2]
[17:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xchat [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.8.8-15]
[17:55] <slangasek> infinity: ok.  that's exactly why I'm deferring to you on it.  it has my +1
[17:57] <slangasek> infinity: how was the arm64 retry mashing done?  Most of the blocking arm64 autopkgtests do not have new results, nor do they have currently-running tests
[18:00] <infinity> slangasek: You're just in the window where finished things don't have results yet, I think.
[18:00] <slangasek> infinity: it's looking like a longer window than is proper
[18:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: meld (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.18.0-4 => 3.18.0-6] (no packageset) (sync)
[18:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted meld [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.18.0-6]
[18:02] <infinity> slangasek: I've gotten some back.
[18:02] <slangasek> infinity: e.g. you said "already mashed" 16 minutes ago, some of these tests should take between 6 and 14 minutes (http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/c/cockpit/bionic/arm64), so they're at least 2 minutes delinquent.  which ones have you gotten back?
[18:03] <slangasek> I'm clicking through and just seeing bunches of red
[18:04] <infinity> slangasek: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/update-notifier/bionic/arm64 for instance.
[18:04] <infinity> I admit I didn't keep all the windows open.
[18:04] <Laney> Not sure they were all retried
[18:04] <Laney> There's no trace of cockpit in the logs since the earlier failure
[18:04] <slangasek> yeah that's what I'm getting at
[18:04] <slangasek> :)
[18:05] <slangasek> so I'll mash some other buttons
[18:06] <slangasek> done
[18:07] <slangasek> infinity: anything blocking us at this point which isn't accepted into -proposed?  looks like it'll be another late-in-the-day respin the world?
[18:11] <infinity> slangasek: I don't think we're waiting on anything, except maybe me fixing flash-kernel a tiny bit harder, but that will migrate instantly if I do.
[18:12] <infinity> Plus, it's only on one image.
[18:14] <infinity> Also about ready for a block-all source once the current batch is through.
[18:23]  * slangasek nods
[18:25] <LocutusOfBorg> lol infinity so I was already the person who subscribed archive team to remove pkg-create-dbgsym package? I might have been pissed off that day because of some failures due to it being installed on some old systems :)
[18:25] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks!
[18:38] <infinity> apw: Can you make a determination on the kernel in proposed and clear the block-proposed tag if you're happy with them (and tell me why not if you're not).  I'm going to grab some food while I wait for the world to do things.
[18:43] <infinity> sforshee: ^
[18:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debian-installer (bionic-proposed/main) [20101020ubuntu540 => 20101020ubuntu541] (core)
[18:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted juju-core [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.3.7-0ubuntu0.16.04.1]
[18:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1009.9] (kernel)
[18:51] <acheronuk> infinity slangasek: I think lubuntu would quite like a lxpanel fix to evict deepin-terminal from any spun image? LP: #1766478
[18:51] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 1766478 in lxpanel (Ubuntu) "Deepin terminal is installed in base install unintentionally" [Undecided,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1766478
[18:52] <acheronuk> but tsimonq2 is just about to roll wheels on his driving test!
[19:00] <slangasek> acheronuk: so are there no other uploaders for this who can take care of it?
[19:17] <cyphermox> acheronuk: want to make the change I can sponsor?
[19:17] <tsimonq2> slangasek: (wxl doesn't have upload access, gilir is nowhere to be found, I'm about to go AFK for Important Things, acheronuk doesn't have PPU; yes)
[19:19] <slangasek> I could upload the fix now fwiw - unless someone's specifically fishing for sponsorship
[19:19] <cyphermox> I'm not convinced just lxpanel is going to be enough
[19:20] <cyphermox> germinate seems to say it's apport-gtk who wants deepin-term
[19:21] <sforshee> infinity: I blew away the blockers for everything but azure, whose signed package is still in the new queue
[19:22] <sforshee> infinity: also highlight cascardo for bionic stuff, I'm going to be afk for a while here pretty soon
[19:23] <cascardo> hi there
[19:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxpanel (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.9.3-1ubuntu2 => 0.9.3-1ubuntu3] (lubuntu)
[19:24] <slangasek> cyphermox: germinate> pointer?
[19:25] <slangasek> cyphermox: lxpanel should be fixed anyway, but we might also have to juggle seeds
[19:25] <cyphermox> http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/germinate-output/lubuntu.bionic/all
[19:25] <cyphermox> slangasek: looking harder, maybe lxpanel would be sufficient
[19:25] <cyphermox> (since this shows up in all, and so far I don't find anywhere else)
[19:27] <cyphermox> nah, lxterminal is explicitly in core-gtk
[19:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lxpanel [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.9.3-1ubuntu3]
[19:28] <slangasek> cyphermox: deepin-terminal in http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/germinate-output/lubuntu.bionic/core
[19:28] <slangasek> and blames apport-gtk
[19:28] <cyphermox> yeah, I was just typing that
[19:29] <cyphermox> also, lubuntu is no-follow-recommends, and lxpanel only recommends x-terminal-emulator
[19:29] <slangasek> k
[19:30] <acheronuk> lubuntu said to me they now follow recommends. but I don't know what they changed
[19:30] <acheronuk> [17:51] <wxl> acheronuk: yes that's the bug. @tsimonq2 that looks like a consequence of allowing recommends :/
[19:31] <tsimonq2> waaat
[19:31] <tsimonq2> No we don't.
[19:31] <cyphermox> the seed git disagrees, if I'm looking at the right place
[19:31] <tsimonq2> ^
[19:31] <tsimonq2> (You most likely are.)
[19:31] <acheronuk> ok. just repeating what was said in lubuntu-devel
[19:31] <cyphermox> slangasek: apport-gtk should recommends rather than depends on x-terminal-emulator?
[19:31] <acheronuk> as said, 'I know nothing'
[19:33] <slangasek> cyphermox: solved differently.  lubuntu.bionic/core updated to explicitly seed lxterminal instead of relying on traversal of lubuntu-core dependencies, since lubuntu-core Depends: apport-gtk, [...] lxterminal and the depth-first dependency resolution traverses the first before it sees the second
[19:33] <slangasek> although it's possible that won't work
[19:34] <cyphermox> ack
[19:34] <cyphermox> slangasek: I was thinking this was more a matter of sorting than traversal order, this makes sense
[19:34] <slangasek> anyway, going to check now what an update gives me
[19:35] <slangasek> cyphermox: unfortunately the sorting of dependencies is somewhat enforced nowadays by dpkg-dev
[19:35] <slangasek> I could create another metapackage, aaaaaaa-no-not-that-one
[19:35] <slangasek> -lubuntu
[19:35] <cyphermox> bah
[19:36] <cyphermox> arguably apport-gtk doesn't need a hard depends on x-terminal-emulator; it only tries to run a terminal if apport-retrace is already installed, and checks if some term exists first
[19:37] <slangasek> yes; however, fixing this by demoting it to recommends is a short-term fix anyway because lubuntu is meant to follow-recommends eventually
[19:37] <slangasek> so if we can fix it properly, and without having to send apport through the publisher cycle, I would prefer that
[19:42] <slangasek> lubuntu-meta (0.95) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
[19:42] <slangasek>   * Refreshed dependencies
[19:42] <slangasek>   * Added lxterminal to core
[19:42] <slangasek> that looks promising
[19:42] <cyphermox> wee
[19:42] <slangasek> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
[19:42] <slangasek>  lxpanel
[19:42] <slangasek>  lxsession
[19:42] <slangasek>  lxterminal
[19:42] <slangasek> +lxterminal
[19:42] <ubot5-ng> slangasek: Error: "@" is not a valid command.
[19:42] <slangasek>  openbox
[19:42] <slangasek>  pcmanfm
[19:42] <slangasek>  plymouth-theme-lubuntu-logo
[19:42] <slangasek> that looks less promising
[19:43] <lyn||orian> adding lxterminal in twice?
[19:45] <ginggs> tdaitx: LocutusOfBorg asked me to ping you re: LP: #1766649
[19:45] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 1766649 in cmake (Ubuntu) "cmake: upstream patch should use 10 instead of 1.10 for java version comparison" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1766649
[19:46] <slangasek> ginggs: the fix for which is theoretically currently in -proposed?
[19:46] <slangasek> ah, I see he's just updated the bug
[19:46] <sil2100> hm, the kernel still in -proposed I see
[19:46] <slangasek> "not working properly" means what?
[19:49] <ginggs> slangasek: I've asked, will relay if I get an answer
[19:55] <slangasek> cyphermox, acheronuk: lubuntu is clearly getting deepin-terminal because it's alphabetically the first solution for x-terminal-emulator, and apport-gtk is alphabetically the first dependency of lubuntu-core.  It's hard to fix either of these things.  Strangely, ubuntu-desktop gets its preferred terminal as a side effect of xinit Recommends: gnome-terminal | xterm | x-session-manager |
[19:55] <slangasek> x-window-manager | x-terminal-emulator
[19:56] <ginggs> slangasek: I still would like to get ocrmypdf in, but don't know what to do - I can't even stop building the s390x binaries, as ocrmypdf is arch:all. According to the Debian maintainer, "Tesseract 4 is known to not work on big endian" debian #849094  So could I make tesseract build on little-endian only, would that help?
[19:56] <ubot5`> Debian bug 849094 in liblept5 "liblept5: Broken on s390x (+ other big endian archs)" [Normal,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/849094
[19:57] <slangasek> ginggs: there were previous autopkgtests that passed on s390x.  What were these tests?  Is ocrmypdf so completely broken that being able to gate on the results of those previous tests is useless?
[19:58] <cyphermox> slangasek: "yay"
[19:58] <cyphermox> slangasek: so, ok to upload apport-gtk that reduces the Depends to a Recommends?
[19:58] <slangasek> cyphermox: the solution that will fail again as soon as lubuntu starts to follow recommends?
[19:59] <slangasek> cyphermox: go for it. autopkgtests only take 7 minutes to run, apport takes 6 minutes to build
[20:00] <cyphermox> slangasek: lubuntu will only start to follow recommends after 18.04.
[20:00] <slangasek> yes
[20:00] <slangasek> but maybe apport should actually Suggests: x-terminal-emulator instead of recommending
[20:01] <cyphermox> fair
[20:04] <jbicha> yeah, germinate terminals are a pain https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xinit/+changelog
[20:05] <cyphermox> jbicha: not quite the same problem :)
[20:06] <jbicha> getting xterm out of main took a long time
[20:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apport (bionic-proposed/main) [2.20.9-0ubuntu6 => 2.20.9-0ubuntu7] (core)
[20:13] <slangasek> ginggs: so, is it an option to XFAIL those tests that we know won't pass on s390x, instead of badtesting on s390x and completely bypassing CI for it?
[20:13] <slangasek> ginggs: if you tell me it's not an option, then a badtest is the sensible fallback
[20:14] <ginggs> slangasek: i can try XFAILing those tests
[20:15] <slangasek> cyphermox: we could've also created a dummy package a-terminal-emulator depending on lxterminal ;-)
[20:16] <ginggs> slangasek: iirc, there was a badtest for it in the past, but then it started working for a while
[20:16] <slangasek> sil2100: do you know why debian-installer is in the queue?  (vs accepted)
[20:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apport [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.20.9-0ubuntu7]
[20:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted debian-installer [source] (bionic-proposed) [20101020ubuntu541]
[20:23] <flocculant> slangasek: shall I expect another respin when I wake up in 8 or so hours?
[20:23] <slangasek> flocculant: yes
[20:23] <ginggs> slangasek: re: cmake, LocutusOfBorg thinks ceph in his ppa is still failing, but he will check when he gets home
[20:23] <flocculant> slangasek: thanks
[20:25]  * sil2100 looks
[20:25] <sil2100> slangasek: you accepted it?
[20:26] <tdaitx> ginggs: LocutusOfBorg: reported the bug upstream and updated ours with the link, I am rebuilding ceph in my own ppa as well, but it takes a couple hours to finish
[20:27] <tdaitx> if you happen to have the buildlog failure, please add that to the bug so I can take a look
[20:32] <slangasek> sil2100: I did; I didn't see anything blocking, and am keen to get everything built
[20:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1009.9]
[20:32] <sil2100> slangasek: yeah, I guess it's basically needed for linux to migrate
[20:33] <sil2100> slangasek: at least so it seems from update output from first glance, since right now it's making debian-installer-udebs uninstallable
[20:34] <slangasek> sil2100: correct.  and the uploader knows that d-i needs to migrate at the same time as linux, so I was asking if you knew anything I missed
[20:34] <sil2100> No, sadly I had no context of that, I just recently got back from dinner ;)
[20:35] <slangasek> perhaps he assumed there would be prompt review without him having to say anything
[20:37] <infinity> slangasek: He might have planned to self-accept and then got distracted by a bratwurst.
[20:37] <slangasek> infinity: reasonable
[20:38] <infinity> slangasek: Going to kick back and relax for a couple of hours and then check on the state of the churn and block-all/respin before bed.
[20:38] <slangasek> (both the self-accept, and the bratwurst)
[20:38] <slangasek> tdaitx, ginggs: LocutusOfBorg's ppa is not configured to build against -proposed; those build failures are inconclusive
[21:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: activemq (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.15.3-1 => 5.15.3-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[21:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted activemq [sync] (bionic-proposed) [5.15.3-2]
[21:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot amd64 [Bionic Final] has been updated (20101020ubuntu541)
[21:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot arm64 [Bionic Final] has been updated (20101020ubuntu541)
[21:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot armhf [Bionic Final] has been updated (20101020ubuntu541)
[21:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot i386 [Bionic Final] has been updated (20101020ubuntu541)
[21:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot ppc64el [Bionic Final] has been updated (20101020ubuntu541)
[21:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot s390x [Bionic Final] has been updated (20101020ubuntu541)
[22:04] <LocutusOfBorg> slangasek, actually ppc64el should have picked it up
[22:05] <LocutusOfBorg> tdaitx, https://launchpad.net/~costamagnagianfranco/+archive/ubuntu/locutusofborg-ppa/+build/14793210
[22:14] <slangasek> LocutusOfBorg: ah; so you tested with a local cmake in your own ppa?  Is your cmake source identical to what was uploaded to the archive?
[22:16] <LocutusOfBorg> yes slangasek I did that
[22:16] <slangasek> k
[22:17] <LocutusOfBorg> buuuuut javah is not found becauseeeee openjdk is not providing it? lol
[22:17] <slangasek> correct that openjdk is not providing it
[22:17] <slangasek> I'm told it's now called javac -h
[22:18] <tsimonq2> Can anyone repro bug 1766049? I'm getting failed testcases because of it.
[22:18] <ubot5`> bug 1766049 in Ubuntu Manual Tests "Restart is not working at the end of bionic final installation" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1766049
[22:18] <LocutusOfBorg> so there was no need to upload this cmake version probably
[22:19] <LocutusOfBorg> I mean, we need the cmake in proposed, but we need also sourceful upload of ceph, dropping javah
[22:19] <LocutusOfBorg> seems legit now :)
[22:21] <LocutusOfBorg> please can we keep it in proposed until I sort it out?
[22:21] <slangasek> why?
[22:22] <LocutusOfBorg> because I see the run against cmake in release finding java correctly https://launchpad.net/~costamagnagianfranco/+archive/ubuntu/locutusofborg-ppa/+build/14793207
[22:26] <slangasek> LocutusOfBorg: so if you're saying it's a no-op, so be it.  That's not a reason to keep it hanging around in -proposed anyway
[22:27] <LocutusOfBorg> I don't know if this is a no-op or not... better wait for tdaitx
[22:27] <LocutusOfBorg> I might be more confident with a revert of the upload, and then an eventual SRU later
[22:29] <slangasek> linux migrating
[22:39] <LocutusOfBorg> the cmake fix seems sane anyway
[22:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ocrmypdf (bionic-proposed/universe) [6.1.2-1 => 6.1.2-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[22:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ocrmypdf [source] (bionic-proposed) [6.1.2-1ubuntu1]
[22:51] <slangasek> cyphermox: lol the linux-signed packaging split regresses the apport testsuite on amd64.  badtesting
[22:53] <cascardo> lol
[22:53] <cyphermox> slangasek: this is hilarious
[22:54] <slangasek> LP: #1766740
[22:54] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 1766740 in apport (Ubuntu) "apport autopkgtest regression due to kernel packaging changes" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1766740
[23:03] <slangasek> tsimonq2, infinity: where do we sit wrt Supported: metadata for Lubuntu-Next?
[23:04] <tsimonq2> slangasek: I'm uncertain on it, but I can get back to you as soon as I can.
[23:06] <slangasek> tsimonq2: ok.  hard deadline of early Thursday for that
[23:06] <tsimonq2> slangasek: ack
[23:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ddccontrol (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.4.3-1ubuntu1 => 0.4.3-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[23:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ddccontrol [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.4.3-2]
[23:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-pefile (bionic-proposed/universe) [2017.11.5-1 => 2017.11.5-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[23:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-pefile [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2017.11.5-2]
[23:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fonts-noto-color-emoji (bionic-proposed/main) [0~20180102-1 => 0~20180424-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[23:35] <infinity> tjaalton: linux-signed-oem has a built-dep that can never be satisfied.
[23:35] <jbicha> ^ the emoji font is just an SRU candidate