[06:28] <didrocks> good morning
[06:42] <duflu> Morning didrocks
[06:45] <didrocks> hey duflu!
[06:46] <duflu> It's a new day...
[06:48] <didrocks> heh, a new area :)
[06:53] <c-lobrano> good morning! Congratulation for the new LTS ;)
=== pstolowski|afk is now known as pstolowski
[08:04] <jibel> Good morning
[08:06] <didrocks> salut jibel, ça va ?
[08:06] <jibel> salut didrocks, ça va bien. Après une journée pleine de rebondissements, la release a enfin vu le jour donc tout va bien :)
[08:07] <didrocks> jibel: ouais, c'était assez épique :)
[08:07] <didrocks> jibel: si on avait utilisé mon workaround safe de mardi plutôt que "the right thing", ce side effect n'aurait pas eu lieu :/
[08:11] <jibel> l'essentiel c'est d'avoir release on-time une fois de plus meme si c'était un peu mouvementé
[08:11] <didrocks> yep ;)
[08:12] <jibel> looking at incoming bug reports the main problem with the installer is the removal of the big fat warning when doing an efi install with an existing legacy system installed
[08:12] <jibel> grub crashes
[08:12] <didrocks> argh
[08:13] <jibel> and regarding upgrades there is this nasty "triggers looping" bug
[08:15] <pitti> bonojur tout le monde !
[08:15] <pitti> congratulations to 18.04 LTS!
[08:15] <didrocks> yeah, the triggers looping one :/
[08:16] <didrocks> Guten Morgen pitti! Danke Schon
[08:16] <pitti> so, gnome-shell LTS :)
[08:17] <didrocks> yes! We'll see how that goes :)
[08:18] <duflu> Morning jibel, pitti
[08:21] <jibel> Bonjour pitti and duflu
[08:27] <seb128> good morning desktopers
[08:29] <seb128> congrats on the release everyone!
[08:29] <didrocks> salut seb128 :) Congrats as well !
[08:30] <jibel> Salut seb128
[08:31] <duflu> Morning seb128
[08:31] <duflu> Odd the number of 16.04 and 17.10 bug reports I've seen today
[08:32] <willcooke> morning all
[08:32] <duflu> Morning willcooke
[08:32] <didrocks> hey willcooke
[08:32] <seb128> hey willcooke
[08:33] <willcooke> reports from OEM seem to show that bolt is working as it should
[08:33] <didrocks> nice
[08:34] <duflu> Is that something holding up the metaphorical structure, or Thunderbolt? :)
[08:35] <willcooke> they're getting the notifications when the plug a thunderbolt device in
[08:38] <seb128> and the prompt seems to success to auth the device so it can be used
[08:40] <willcooke> \o/
[08:43] <zyga> hey
[08:43] <zyga> does bionic have gnome shell <-> bolt thunderbolt integration?
[08:43] <zyga> oh
[08:43] <didrocks> hey zyga! see the discussion we just got :)
[08:43] <zyga> I see thunderbolt is being discussed :D
[08:43] <zyga> man so funny
[08:43] <didrocks> heh
[08:43] <tjaalton> huh, win+arrow changed the tty, not the window location
[08:43] <tjaalton> wth
[08:44] <zyga> do we plan to back port bolt 0.3 to bionic?
[08:45] <seb128> what do you need from it?
[08:45] <seb128> upstream said there was nothing "important" and that we were fine staying on 0.2
[08:45] <zyga> I don't know yet, just parity I would say
[08:45] <seb128> parity with?
[08:45] <zyga> but if it's just internal refactoring then perhaps not worth it
[08:45] <zyga> with F28
[08:46] <seb128> what's the interest?
[08:46] <zyga> though it would be nice to have LTS-ish release
[08:46] <seb128> newest isn't always better or more stable
[08:46] <seb128> that component is really young
[08:46] <zyga> that true but I don't know if 0.2 will be maintained over time
[08:46] <seb128> I expect quite some changes
[08:46] <zyga> so probably saying on the moving version is better
[08:46] <zyga> but maybe not, just curious
[08:46] <seb128> you seem interested
[08:46] <zyga> now that I have a thunderbolt port :)
[08:47] <seb128> want to become the maintainer in Ubuntu?
[08:47] <seb128> :)
[08:47] <zyga> I don't know what kind of work that is coupled with TBH
[08:47] <zyga> I can help with testing for sure, I have some hardware and I'm genuinely interested in the technology
[08:47] <willcooke> its a trap
[08:49] <seb128> willcooke, shush :p
[08:49] <zyga> oh noes, the death start is operational ;D
[08:50] <seb128> zyga, joke aside, 0.3 was just too close from release and I talked to upstream and he said there was no strong reason that we needed to update
[08:50] <zyga> seb128: understood, thank you :)
[08:50] <seb128> but that component is new and changing
[08:50] <seb128> and it's hardware enablement
[08:50] <willcooke> we will be adding new a new settings panel to B though
[08:50] <seb128> so I expect we are going to SRU new versions
[08:50] <willcooke> for TB
[08:50] <seb128> and add the control panel for LTS .1
[08:50] <jbicha> zyga: want to become the maintainer in Debian? ;)
[08:50] <jbicha> good morning
[08:50] <zyga> jbicha: good morning
[08:51] <zyga> jbicha: I suppose I can co maintain it there, sure
[08:52] <seb128> trolling doesn't work on him :p
[08:52] <seb128> even on a friday!
[08:52] <zyga> I'm really interested
[08:52] <willcooke> morning jbicha
[08:53] <jbicha> zyga: I guess https://salsa.debian.org/freedesktop-team/ would be a good place for it
[08:54] <seb128> zyga, anyway we welcome testing & feedback in any case
[08:54] <seb128> so let us know if/how it works for you
[08:54] <zyga> I'm trying right now
[08:55] <zyga> is bolt responsible for anything thunderbolt or just certain kinds of devices
[08:55] <zyga> for instance TB3/USB adapter seems to be transparent, probably just using usb mode of usb-c
[08:55] <zyga> I need to try with an ethernet adapter next
[08:57] <jbicha> zyga: we appreciate the testing. I don't think any Desktop team members have thunderbolt devices yet
[08:57] <zyga> jbicha: I wonder if it depends on apple vs non-apple
[08:57] <zyga> I have a thinkpad with a single TB3/usb-c port
[08:58] <zyga> I just purchased some adapters, I will have them next wee
[08:58] <zyga> week
[09:01] <willcooke> zyga, are you in Berlin next week at the product sprint?
[09:01] <zyga> no, sadly not
[09:01] <zyga> I could drive over if you need me to :)
[09:01] <zyga> (well, on the train)
[09:01] <zyga> mvo will be there
[09:02] <zyga> why do you ask? could I help somehow?
[09:02] <willcooke> zyga, nah s'fine - was looking to play with some TB hardware :)
[09:08] <zyga> I had it the last time in Budapest :)
[09:08] <willcooke> we didnt have bolt MIRed at that point
[09:08] <willcooke> I think
[09:08] <zyga> ah I see
[09:09] <zyga> I didn't know about it before I read F28 release news
[09:11] <andyrock> good morning!
[09:15] <willcooke> hey andyrock
[09:18] <seb128> hey andyrock, how are you?
[09:19] <andyrock> hey seb128! fine you?
[09:19] <seb128> I'm good thanks
[09:19] <andyrock> checking errors.ubuntu.com
[09:19] <andyrock> :D
[09:19] <seb128> enjoy my day off by chatting with nice desktop people about the new Ubuntu :)
[09:19] <seb128> haha
[09:20] <didrocks> andyrock: you can see how seb is totally off ;)
[09:20] <andyrock> lol
[09:25] <duflu> andyrock, I think it's too early to check the error stats. It takes a week or two for most people to upgrade
[09:25] <jbicha> in other news, Fedora 28 will release in a few days, on time for once: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/UDWYTL2WYIU7P6UPQUGWNNQQZ3WLZ6HL/
[09:25] <duflu> Also morning andyrock
[09:26] <willcooke> is that xorg issue someting we should flag up right away?
[09:35] <duflu> willcooke, which issue?
[09:36] <willcooke> oh, ignore
[09:36] <willcooke> :)
[09:36] <willcooke> hm
[09:36] <willcooke> https://errors.ubuntu.com/problem/4de849dfec89af168af9cda3318221a2a654e530
[09:37] <didrocks> zyga: hey, does is make sense for my classic snap to try using ld-linux from the core snap?
[09:37] <didrocks> zyga: lead myself to a segfault
[09:38] <zyga> yes, it should
[09:38] <didrocks> zyga: I think there is a bionic vs xenial issue though…
[09:38] <didrocks> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[09:38] <didrocks> 0x00007ffff7dda949 in ?? () from /snap/core/current/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
[09:38] <didrocks> in gdb
[09:38] <didrocks> for a go program
[09:42] <duflu> willcooke, yeah I was thinking about that bug again recently, as it happens.
[09:43] <duflu> I've been frustrated at how non-obvious and hard it is to just launch 'Xorg'
[09:43] <duflu> Turns out you need to tell it the current VT:  Xorg :0 vt4
[10:10] <duflu> Happy release weekend peoples
[10:10]  * duflu shuts down
[10:11] <didrocks> see you duflu!
[10:22] <willcooke> brb
=== jhernandez is now known as jhernandez_
[10:59] <Laney> moin
=== JanC is now known as Guest28882
=== JanC_ is now known as JanC
=== sergiusens_ is now known as sergiusens
[11:58] <ads20000> willcooke: the link to the communitheme snap in your bionic insights article is wrong
[11:58] <ads20000> it points to https://communitheme rather than snap://communitheme :)
[13:19] <Laney> EPIC FAIL
[13:20] <willcooke> stupid wordpress
[13:25] <marathone> Congratulations to the Desktop Team!
[13:31] <acheronuk> hi. is intended to still have "update-manager -cd" and "sudo do-release-upgrade -d" in the release notes?
[13:34] <marathone> !isitout
[13:34] <ubot5> Yes, it's out! Party in #ubuntu-release-party :)
[13:37] <willcooke> acheronuk, ah, good spot.  Thanks
[13:37] <acheronuk> np
[13:38]  * willcooke heads home
[13:38] <willcooke> "see" you next week on IRC
[13:58] <acheronuk> hmmmm. willcooke's edit lock on the releasenotes wiki page expired. maybe went home without making any change?
[13:59] <acheronuk> I would just remove the -d if that is what you want, but not sure if it's intended to put some explanation in it's place that upgrades are not turned on in the meta just yet?
[14:01] <jbicha> acheronuk: the -d is still needed until http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/meta-release is updated
[14:03] <acheronuk> jbicha: that was why I asked if it was intentional. i.e. that you wanted the instructions in the main notes to force upgrades now, even though the meta is not updated
[14:05] <acheronuk> so all is good if that is what you want :)
[14:06] <jbicha> acheronuk: unless you want to add an explanation of why the "-d" is needed for the next few days…
[14:08] <mgedmin> that would be very welcome; I _always_ get confused the first day after a release, before the meta-release gets updated
[14:58] <jbicha> mgedmin: do you have wiki write access? I guess a note would be good since all of these third party sites will post instructions using " -d" and that will be Fun when we open up Chaotic Chameleon for updates
[14:59] <mgedmin> I doubt I have access
[14:59]  * mgedmin is currently recovering from a failed 17.10 -> 18.04 upgrade
[15:00] <Laney> umm, no, we should just be advising people to wait until it's turned on
[15:00] <jbicha> ok, let me do that…
[15:01] <Laney> the reason there's a little delay is to give a chance to shake out upgrade bugs if there are any
[15:05] <Laney> thx!
[15:43] <mpt> didrocks, jbicha: How do I re-run gnome-initial-setup if it’s already run? (Typing “gnome-initial-setup” at the terminal claims it’s not found, but trying to install it says it’s already manually installed.)
[15:49] <jbicha> 2 ways:
[15:49] <jbicha> /usr/lib/gnome-initial-setup/gnome-initial-setup --existing-user
[15:49] <didrocks> mpt: you need to run /usr/lib/gnome-initial-setup/gnome-initial-setup --existing-use, but it have a missing lib that way
[15:49] <jbicha> or just rm   ~/.config/gnome-initial-setup-done
[15:49] <didrocks> ah no, it should be fine in your system
[15:49] <didrocks> mpt: if you remove the file jbicha points at, you need to logout/login again
[15:50] <jbicha> didrocks: no you don't :)
[15:50] <didrocks> hum
[15:50] <didrocks> you mean i just have to remove the file and the autostart will kick in?
[15:50] <jbicha> yes :|
[15:50] <mpt> Ask two people, get three answers :-D
[15:50] <didrocks> waow, didn't know the check was done regularly in Application phase
[15:51] <didrocks> mpt: because we love you :)
[15:51] <jbicha> you have to log out for the first time if gnome-initial-setup wasn't installed before, see LP: #1697769 for the similar tracker issue
[15:51] <ubot5> Launchpad bug 1697769 in tracker (Ubuntu) "tracker doesn't automatically start when installed until after log out and log in" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1697769
[15:52] <mpt> Hmm, so the window is not closable, minimizable, or unmaximizable, but you can drag it away from the top bar, which makes it 242*56 pixels. That’s interesting behavior.
[15:56] <jbicha> if you have a big enough screen, it's not maximized
[15:56] <jbicha> but in that case, it's not movable either!
[16:05] <didrocks> have a good week-end everyone!
[16:33] <fuzzylaw> Hey guys, How do I enable workspace isolation in ubuntu 18.04?
=== pstolowski is now known as pstolowski|eow