[00:01] <infinity> acheronuk: We'll give it a day or three to see if any critical upgrade bugs trickle in that we should be SRUing for before opening the flood gates.
[00:02] <acheronuk> fair enough. seems sensible
[00:08] <teward> infinity: et. al. who do we stab for an incorrect link on the ubuntu.com alternate downloads page?
[00:08] <teward> s/stab/poke/
[00:10] <slangasek> teward: which page?
[00:10] <sarnold> https://www.ubuntu.com/download/alternative-downloads
[00:10] <slangasek> and which link?
[00:10] <sarnold> Ubuntu 18.04 Server (64-bit)   http://releases.ubuntu.com/18.04/ubuntu-18.04-server-amd64.iso.torrent
[00:10] <teward> slangasek: https://www.ubuntu.com/download/alternative-downloads - ubuntu server 18.04
[00:10] <teward> link should be http://releases.ubuntu.com/bionic/ubuntu-18.04-live-server-amd64.iso.torrent
[00:10] <teward> it's missing -live- in there
[00:11] <slangasek> k
[00:11] <teward> at least, for the torrents one that sarnold poked at :P
[00:11] <slangasek> not sure I can find anybody on the web team to fix it at this point; let me check with IS
[00:11] <teward> slangasek: thanks.
[00:15] <teward> slangasek: it's a known issue that `do-release-upgrade` alone doesn't find the 18.04 release, right?  Or is this a slow-to-update thing somewhere?
[00:15] <teward> (that is, d-r-u without the `-d` arg/flag)
[00:15] <sarnold> I believe that's the meta on changelogs.ubuntu.com mentioned fifteen minutes ago
[00:16] <teward> ah I guess I missed that message.
[00:16] <teward> my fault for having to juggle multiple windows at once :p
[00:21] <ErichEickmeyer> !tell
[00:21] <ErichEickmeyer> Derp, wrong channel.
[00:21] <ErichEickmeyer> Dunno what happened to sil2100, but wanted to say thanks for marking it as ready. Looks good to me.
[00:22] <sarnold> bed :)
[00:22] <ErichEickmeyer> I'll get the release notes ready. I'm at my day job right now (and for abot the next 4 hours), so I'll get a release announcement going as soon as I can. Only thing is we need to update the release notes on the Wiki for Studio (I do not currently have access to that).
[00:23] <ErichEickmeyer> sarnold: Ah.
[00:23] <ErichEickmeyer> Thanks.
[00:38] <Ukikie> teward: LTS users get offered at the first point release, IIRC.
[00:39] <teward> that's what I thought, but wanted a confirm :p
[00:54] <slangasek> teward, sarnold: fixed
[00:55] <teward> slangasek: thanks.
[01:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (bionic-proposed/main) [18.2-14-g6d48d265-0ubuntu1 => 18.2-27-g6ef92c98-0ubuntu1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server)
[02:20] <Odd_Bloke> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub-installer/+bug/1767224 <-- I think this is on the wrong project, but sounds familiar
[02:20] <ubot5> Launchpad bug 1767224 in grub-installer (Ubuntu) "Installer crashed on install during the grub install process" [Undecided,New]
[04:01] <flocculant> xubuntu doesn't appear to have a release, or I've gone blind http://cdimages.ubuntu.com/xubuntu/releases/18.04/release/
[04:06] <SlidingHorn> flocculant: it's showing up for me
[04:06] <flocculant> mmm
[04:07] <SlidingHorn> cdimage instead of images
[04:07] <flocculant> mmm
[04:08] <flocculant> well no-one else from xubuntu has said anything - so it must work somewhere
[04:08] <SlidingHorn> using the singular subdomain doesn't work for you either?
[04:09] <flocculant> nope
[04:09] <flocculant> anyway - ignoring that - too early
[04:09] <SlidingHorn>  Well I assure you it shows here! xD
[04:11] <Bashing-om> flocculant: Looks good here also " xubuntu-18.04-desktop-amd64.iso2018-04-26 18:401.3G" .
[04:23] <flocculant> well it doesn't show up in a vm browser
[04:30] <slangasek> there are multiple frontends to cdimage.u.c and it looks like one of them must have run out of disk.  checking to see if I can fix this quickly
[04:31] <flocculant> slangasek: thanks
[04:31] <slangasek> ... or, multiple frontends may have run out of space.
[04:32] <slangasek> I'm not immediately seeing anything in the mirror set that shouldn't be there
[04:33] <flocculant> I'd assume it was local firefox until it was empty on vm too
[04:37] <ErichEickmeyer> Noticing the same problem for Ubuntu Studio, btw.
[04:38] <ErichEickmeyer> flocculant: Thanks for all your help, btw! :)
[04:38] <slangasek> ubuntustudio is mirrored now
[04:38] <ErichEickmeyer> Ah, thank you slangasek!
[04:38] <slangasek> xubuntu also now mirrored
[04:41] <flocculant> slangasek: thanks :)
[04:41] <flocculant> ErichEickmeyer: welcome :)
[04:41] <flocculant> slangasek: didn't help people telling me they could see it lol
[04:42] <flocculant> anyway - back to getting ready for work
[04:42] <flocculant> thanks again
[04:48] <slangasek> flocculant: there's a new frontend with plenty of space, and the other two in the rotation are right at capacity for what we're throwing at them :/
[04:49] <flocculant> price of popularity?
[04:51] <slangasek> in this case, definitely the price of longevity
[04:51] <flocculant> :)
[04:52] <flocculant> anyway - thanks for looking and fixing that - have a good rest of day
[06:13] <doko> is the archive already frozen? if not, woo is now built everywhere
[06:18] <Ukikie> Bionic was released, mate.
[07:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-meta-oem (xenial-proposed/universe) [4.13.0.1024.28 => 4.13.0.1025.30] (kernel)
[08:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected linux-meta-oem [source] (xenial-proposed) [4.13.0.1025.30]
[09:42] <acheronuk> morning. are we now on the normal 1 week testing for bug fixing SRUs?
[09:50] <sil2100> acheronuk: yeah
[09:51] <acheronuk> fair enough. thanks
[10:58] <infinity> acheronuk: Yes and no.  If it's a bug that affects upgrades, *and* is trivially visually reviewable, *and* is trivially verifiable as correct, then we can fasttrack things.  Keeping upgrades broken for a week just to satisfy the rules is daft.
[11:03] <sil2100> I guess that's true indeed
[11:05] <infinity> sil2100: Heading into the office in a couple of minutes if anyone's there.  So, y'know, hide all the crude drawings of ritual infinity sacrifice and such.
[11:06] <sil2100> infinity: no such drawings here! (/me quickly throws out some papers from the desk)
[11:07] <sil2100> Besides, we only do naughty drawings here
[11:10] <Mirv> good shiny morning/afternoon to everyone
[11:15] <mdeslaur> congrats release team! :)
[11:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapcraft (xenial-proposed/universe) [2.41 => 2.42] (no packageset)
[11:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapcraft (artful-proposed/universe) [2.41+17.10 => 2.42+17.10] (no packageset)
[11:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapcraft (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.41+18.04.2 => 2.42+18.04] (no packageset)
=== sergiusens_ is now known as sergiusens
[11:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapcraft [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.42]
[11:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapcraft [source] (artful-proposed) [2.42+17.10]
[11:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapcraft [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.42+18.04]
=== s8321414_ is now known as s8321414
[13:24] <marathone> !isitout
[13:24] <ubot5> Yes, it's out! Party in #ubuntu-release-party :)
[13:30] <marathone> !Congratulations
=== Laney changed the topic of #ubuntu-release to: Released: Xenial 16.04.4, Bionic 18.04 | Archive: closed | Bionic Release Coordination | Please don't upload things during freezes where you shouldn't, or be prepared to apologise to the release team | We accept payment in cash, check or beer | melius malum quod cognoscis
[14:10] <guardian> thanks for the hard work
[14:11] <guardian> I've been using 18.04 for a month and it's really great
[15:33] <smoser> can someone NACK my cloud-init upload in the SRU queue for bionic?  We want to fix the changelog a bit.
[15:34] <apw> smoser, looking
[15:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cloud-init [source] (bionic-proposed) [18.2-27-g6ef92c98-0ubuntu1]
[15:35] <apw> smoser, ^
[15:38] <smoser> gracias. /me thinks apw might enjoy NACKing smoser's uploads.
[15:45] <apw> smoser, it would be inappropriate to confirm or deny such a claim :)
[15:48] <j1mc> hello ubuntu-release folks, i was directed here to note a release-related issue, even though it is post-release. the release notes point to a now-dead link for the beta-2 server installer . . .
[15:48] <j1mc> from the notes: `Server installer
[15:48] <j1mc> The next generation Subiquity server installer, brings the comfortable live session and speedy install of Ubuntu Desktop to server users at last.
[15:48] <j1mc> N.B., If you require LVM, RAID, multipath, vlans, bonds, or the ability to re-using existing partitions, you will want to continue to use the alternate installer which can be downloaded from http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/18.04/beta-2/`
[15:49] <j1mc> if i should file a bug for this, which project should i file the bug under?
[15:49] <rbasak> dpb1: ^
[15:50] <dpb1> rbasak: can you edit that page still?
[15:50] <rbasak> Yes the page remains editable.
[15:51] <rbasak> Just need the replacement URL.
[15:51] <dpb1> rbasak: http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/releases/18.04/release/
[15:51] <rbasak> Ah of course.
[15:51] <rbasak> Sorry I assumed it was going to be a deeper link.
[15:51] <rbasak> I'll fix it.
[15:52] <dpb1> well, it wasn't clear to me either
[15:52] <dpb1> not sure what is up with the extra release
[15:52] <dpb1> anyway
[15:52] <dpb1> thanks rbasak
[15:52] <j1mc> it appears as though the beta-2 image would need to be re-posted
[15:53] <rbasak> Done
[15:53] <rbasak> j1mc: I've updated the URL to the release URL. Why would we need to re-post the beta-2 image?
[15:53] <rbasak> It can just point to the release image, right?
[15:55] <j1mc> apologies . . . i'm not sure why you'd need the beta 2 image. from the original release notes, it sounded like the prior version of the installer was only available in the beta-2 image.
[15:55] <rbasak> Sorry for the confusion. The alternate installer is part of the release.
[15:56] <j1mc> if the non-subiquity / prior-version installer is available in the final 18.04 image, then people should be okay.
[15:56] <j1mc> ah, ok. that makes sense. thanks!
[15:56] <dpb1> "traditional server installer", we are still working on that name
[15:56] <dpb1> :)
[15:57] <dpb1> I see it referred to about 3 different ways in the release notes.  ah well
[15:57] <j1mc> good name choice.  thanks again for your help.  : )
[16:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (bionic-proposed/main) [18.2-14-g6d48d265-0ubuntu1 => 18.2-27-g6ef92c98-0ubuntu1~18.04.1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server)
[16:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (artful-proposed/main) [4.13.0-40.45] (core, kernel)
[16:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.13.0-40.45~16.04.1] (kernel)
[16:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-lts-xenial [amd64] (trusty-proposed/main) [4.4.0-123.147~14.04.1] (kernel)
[16:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.4.0-123.147] (core, kernel)
[16:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oem [amd64] (xenial-proposed/universe) [4.13.0-1025.28] (kernel)
[16:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (artful-proposed) [4.13.0-40.45]
[16:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.13.0-1025.28]
[16:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.13.0-40.45~16.04.1]
[16:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.4.0-123.147]
[16:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-lts-xenial [amd64] (trusty-proposed) [4.4.0-123.147~14.04.1]
[17:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dell-recovery (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.58 => 1.59] (no packageset)
[17:59] <youtah> Congrats and a huge thank you to everyone that worked on this! (goes back over to the party channel)
[18:05] <bdmurray> cjwatson: Are you about? I could use some help with Bionic SRU permissions.
[18:46] <cjwatson> bdmurray: for about 5min.  what's up?
[18:47] <bdmurray> cjwatson: I got a 404 trying to let a package into bionic-proposed.
[18:48] <bdmurray> cjwatson: I don't see a step regarding fixing permissions for ubuntu-sru in the release checklist but thought you might remember / be able to do it.
[18:53] <cjwatson> bdmurray: It's in NewReleaseCycleProcess, step 13.  I think it requires ~techboard - I can't do it.
[18:54] <bdmurray> cjwatson: Ah, thanks for the information
[18:54] <bdmurray> cjwatson: An archive admin could accept the SRU though right?
[18:54] <cjwatson> Should be able to, yeah
[18:54] <cjwatson> Unless I'm misremembering, which is very possible at five to eight on a Friday :)
[18:55] <cjwatson> Must run though
[18:59] <gaughen> stgraber, I see that you're listed as archive admin, would you help us out with a bionic sru? ^^
[19:00] <bdmurray> smoser: Or rather Grant ubuntu-sru queue admin access to bionic?
[19:01] <bdmurray> stgraber: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/NewReleaseCycleProcess step 13
[19:01] <bdmurray> smoser: my bad sorry ;-)
[19:31] <stgraber> bdmurray: done
[19:32] <bdmurray> stgraber: thanks!
[19:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (bionic-proposed) [18.2-27-g6ef92c98-0ubuntu1~18.04.1]
[20:10] <gaughen> thanks stgraber!
[23:57] <marathone> !?