=== miguel is now known as Guest43488 | ||
=== jhebden is now known as jhebden-afk | ||
=== jhebden-afk is now known as jhebden | ||
jlacroix | Hello everyone. I have an LXD server (18.04) with five containers running on it. The containers have very low usage, it's more of a test server for me to play with than it is a production system. My issue is that it runs VERY slow. For example, if I run: apt dist-upgrade (for example) it takes a very long time, it seems that it can take 30-60 seconds to install any app (the packages seem to download fast though). I was hoping someone | 03:07 |
---|---|---|
jlacroix | can provide documentation links to what I can do to tune it, I wasn't able to find anything | 03:07 |
jlacroix | Also, it's installed via snap, if that matters | 03:08 |
=== Aztec03 is now known as Panoptes | ||
lordievader | Good morning | 05:59 |
lordievader | jlacroix: I'd try to pinpoint what the problem actually is. Is it disk related, ram, cpu, etc. | 06:00 |
=== stgraber_ is now known as stgraber | ||
Neo4 | who know whether my server is properly work? | 12:18 |
Neo4 | here is test result | 12:18 |
Neo4 | https://ssl-tools.net/mailservers/mail.kselax.ru | 12:18 |
Neo4 | What shall I do for correct those all? | 12:19 |
lordievader | Neo4: You don't want to use a self-signed certificate. | 12:27 |
Neo4 | lordievader: see, there weak ciphers, do you know how I could forbid weak ciphers? | 12:30 |
Neo4 | and should I forbid them? | 12:30 |
lordievader | I try to stay away from mail servers, so no. Read the documentation of your mail server. | 12:30 |
Neo4 | lordievader: how TLS works? | 12:31 |
Neo4 | there ssl3 | 12:31 |
lordievader | But weak ciphers is less of a problem than a self signed certificate. | 12:31 |
OpenTokix | lordievader: no | 12:31 |
OpenTokix | Self signed cert is no less secure then a signed cert. | 12:31 |
lordievader | Fair enough. | 12:32 |
Neo4 | not bad? :) | 13:15 |
Neo4 | https://ssl-tools.net/mailservers/kselax.ru | 13:15 |
Neo4 | I have to get certificate from let's encrypt for mail.kselax.ru, how fast get it? | 13:15 |
Neo4 | see here, How to correct that all errors? | 13:17 |
Neo4 | https://mxtoolbox.com/domain/mail.kselax.ru/ | 13:17 |
blackflow | Neo4: blacklisted by Spamhaus? you're better off getting a new IP. Preferably with a reputable hosting provider that is not blacklisted. | 13:28 |
Ussat | and stop what ya doin to get blacklisted | 13:34 |
Neo4 | blackflow: can I write them and ask kick me from black list I won't more? | 13:36 |
blackflow | Neo4: you could try, but that's Spamhaus. Chances are they'll just laugh at you. | 13:56 |
Ussat | You are probably there for a reason | 13:57 |
Ussat | and they have a process for being removed | 13:57 |
Neo4 | nice :) | 14:30 |
Neo4 | https://ssl-tools.net/mailservers/kselax.ru | 14:30 |
Neo4 | left overcome 5 errors and everything will work perfectly | 14:31 |
Maxel | ok I've added byobu to my ubuntu server, and I want to try and start a second shell session but none of the commands I've googled seem to be working. is there a default key combo? I didn't customize anything | 15:32 |
ahasenack | ctrl-a | 15:32 |
ahasenack | then it will ask you | 15:32 |
Maxel | ah, thanks! | 15:33 |
gabboman | Hi, anyone has experience with conjure-up? is it compatible wit 18.04? | 16:07 |
dpb1 | gaughen: yes | 16:46 |
dpb1 | and yes | 16:46 |
gaughen | dpb1, what? | 16:46 |
nacc | dpb1: did you mean gabboman, who left? | 16:47 |
=== Panoptes is now known as Aztec03 | ||
dpb1 | nacc: yes | 16:55 |
dpb1 | :) | 16:55 |
dpb1 | gaughen: sorry | 16:55 |
=== FalconMillennium is now known as FalconMillenniu | ||
=== FalconMillenniu is now known as FalconMillennium | ||
enoch85 | hey, I'm having issues with setting static IP with netplan | 20:49 |
enoch85 | I use the following YAML: https://codebeautify.org/yaml-validator/cbd763fb | 20:49 |
enoch85 | which is valid | 20:49 |
enoch85 | but netplan apply gives an error | 20:49 |
enoch85 | Error in network definition //etc/netplan/01-netcfg.yaml line 4 column 13: expected mapping | 20:49 |
nacc | enoch85: oh, sorry, i think your indentation is wrong maybe | 20:49 |
nacc | enoch85: you should be indented below the ens32: line, no? | 20:49 |
nacc | enoch85: yaml is sensitive to the layout | 20:50 |
enoch85 | nacc, yeah I know yaml is sesetive, and I really don't like the fact the ifupdown is depcrecated in 18.04, but yeah... why does a valid yaml gives an error | 20:51 |
enoch85 | hwo should I intendent exacly? | 20:51 |
enoch85 | how* | 20:51 |
nacc | enoch85: well 'valid' just means it parses | 20:51 |
nacc | not that it's well-formed | 20:51 |
enoch85 | ok, hmm | 20:51 |
nacc | enoch85: you are defining ethernets, which means the first entry is the key into that dictionary (that's how i think o fit) | 20:52 |
enoch85 | so is it 2 spaces between every intended line? | 20:52 |
nacc | so everything for ens32 should be under ens32: indentend | 20:52 |
nacc | *indented | 20:52 |
nacc | otherwise, it thinks you are defining an empty (or invalid) ens32 entry, then a dhcp4: entry (also invalid), etc. | 20:52 |
powersj | also take a look at: https://netplan.io/examples#dhcp-and-static-addressing | 20:52 |
nacc | powersj: thanks! | 20:52 |
nacc | enoch85: i say this knowing next to nothing about netplan syntax, just based upon judicious use of parsing :) | 20:53 |
enoch85 | ok, so it works now :) | 20:53 |
enoch85 | https://codebeautify.org/yaml-validator/cb8a1a24 | 20:54 |
enoch85 | thanks ncc | 20:54 |
enoch85 | nacc, powersj | 20:54 |
nacc | enoch85: yw | 20:55 |
nacc | enoch85: it helps to translate the yaml into a dictionary | 20:55 |
nacc | enoch85: to see how it's actually going to be used | 20:55 |
enoch85 | nacc, I know what dictionary is, but what do you mean in relation to netplan? | 20:58 |
nacc | enoch85: the yaml is being transformed into a dictionary | 21:02 |
enoch85 | nacc, aah ok | 21:02 |
nacc | enoch85: so if you had read your original, as a dictionary, i think you would have seen the error immediately | 21:02 |
cyphermox | I have code in progress that should improve the error reporting | 21:02 |
nacc | cyphermox: nice | 21:04 |
nacc | cyphermox: yeah there seem to be 'classes' of errors | 21:04 |
nacc | from parse failures to structural issues | 21:04 |
=== Epx998- is now known as Epx998 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!