[03:07] <jlacroix> Hello everyone. I have an LXD server (18.04) with five containers running on it. The containers have very low usage, it's more of a test server for me to play with than it is a production system. My issue is that it runs VERY slow. For example, if I run: apt dist-upgrade (for example) it takes a very long time, it seems that it can take 30-60 seconds to install any app (the packages seem to download fast though). I was hoping someone
[03:07] <jlacroix> can provide documentation links to what I can do to tune it, I wasn't able to find anything
[03:08] <jlacroix> Also, it's installed via snap, if that matters
[05:59] <lordievader> Good morning
[06:00] <lordievader> jlacroix: I'd try to pinpoint what the problem actually is. Is it disk related, ram, cpu, etc.
[12:18] <Neo4> who know whether my server is properly work?
[12:18] <Neo4> here is test result
[12:18] <Neo4> https://ssl-tools.net/mailservers/mail.kselax.ru
[12:19] <Neo4> What shall I do for correct those all?
[12:27] <lordievader> Neo4: You don't want to use a self-signed certificate.
[12:30] <Neo4> lordievader: see, there weak ciphers, do you know how I could forbid weak ciphers?
[12:30] <Neo4> and should I forbid them?
[12:30] <lordievader> I try to stay away from mail servers, so no. Read the documentation of your mail server.
[12:31] <Neo4> lordievader: how TLS works?
[12:31] <Neo4> there ssl3
[12:31] <lordievader> But weak ciphers is less of a problem than a self signed certificate.
[12:31] <OpenTokix> lordievader: no
[12:31] <OpenTokix> Self signed cert is no less secure then a signed cert.
[12:32] <lordievader> Fair enough.
[13:15] <Neo4> not bad? :)
[13:15] <Neo4> https://ssl-tools.net/mailservers/kselax.ru
[13:15] <Neo4> I have to get certificate from let's encrypt for mail.kselax.ru, how fast get it?
[13:17] <Neo4> see here, How to correct that all errors?
[13:17] <Neo4> https://mxtoolbox.com/domain/mail.kselax.ru/
[13:28] <blackflow> Neo4: blacklisted by Spamhaus? you're better off getting a new IP. Preferably with a reputable hosting provider that is not blacklisted.
[13:34] <Ussat> and stop what ya doin to get blacklisted
[13:36] <Neo4> blackflow: can I write them and ask kick me from black list I won't more?
[13:56] <blackflow> Neo4: you could try, but that's Spamhaus. Chances are they'll just laugh at you.
[13:57] <Ussat> You are probably there for a reason
[13:57] <Ussat> and they have a process for being removed
[14:30] <Neo4> nice :)
[14:30] <Neo4> https://ssl-tools.net/mailservers/kselax.ru
[14:31] <Neo4> left overcome 5 errors and everything will work perfectly
[15:32] <Maxel> ok I've added byobu to my ubuntu server, and I want to try and start a second shell session but none of the commands I've googled seem to be working. is there a default key combo? I didn't customize anything
[15:32] <ahasenack> ctrl-a
[15:32] <ahasenack> then it will ask you
[15:33] <Maxel> ah, thanks!
[16:07] <gabboman> Hi, anyone has experience with conjure-up? is it compatible wit 18.04?
[16:46] <dpb1> gaughen: yes
[16:46] <dpb1> and yes
[16:46] <gaughen> dpb1, what?
[16:47] <nacc> dpb1: did you mean gabboman, who left?
[16:55] <dpb1> nacc: yes
[16:55] <dpb1> :)
[16:55] <dpb1> gaughen: sorry
[20:49] <enoch85> hey, I'm having issues with setting static IP with netplan
[20:49] <enoch85> I use the following YAML: https://codebeautify.org/yaml-validator/cbd763fb
[20:49] <enoch85> which is valid
[20:49] <enoch85> but netplan apply gives an error
[20:49] <enoch85> Error in network definition //etc/netplan/01-netcfg.yaml line 4 column 13: expected mapping
[20:49] <nacc> enoch85: oh, sorry, i think your indentation is wrong maybe
[20:49] <nacc> enoch85: you should be indented below the ens32: line, no?
[20:50] <nacc> enoch85: yaml is sensitive to the layout
[20:51] <enoch85> nacc, yeah I know yaml is sesetive, and I really don't like the fact the ifupdown is depcrecated in 18.04, but yeah... why does a valid yaml gives an error
[20:51] <enoch85> hwo should I intendent exacly?
[20:51] <enoch85> how*
[20:51] <nacc> enoch85: well 'valid' just means it parses
[20:51] <nacc> not that it's well-formed
[20:51] <enoch85> ok, hmm
[20:52] <nacc> enoch85: you are defining ethernets, which means the first entry is the key into that dictionary (that's how i think o fit)
[20:52] <enoch85> so is it 2 spaces between every intended line?
[20:52] <nacc> so everything for ens32 should be under ens32: indentend
[20:52] <nacc> *indented
[20:52] <nacc> otherwise, it thinks you are defining an empty (or invalid) ens32 entry, then a dhcp4: entry (also invalid), etc.
[20:52] <powersj> also take a look at: https://netplan.io/examples#dhcp-and-static-addressing
[20:52] <nacc> powersj: thanks!
[20:53] <nacc> enoch85: i say this knowing next to nothing about netplan syntax, just based upon judicious use of parsing :)
[20:53] <enoch85> ok, so it works now :)
[20:54] <enoch85> https://codebeautify.org/yaml-validator/cb8a1a24
[20:54] <enoch85> thanks ncc
[20:54] <enoch85> nacc, powersj
[20:55] <nacc> enoch85: yw
[20:55] <nacc> enoch85: it helps to translate the yaml into a dictionary
[20:55] <nacc> enoch85: to see how it's actually going to be used
[20:58] <enoch85> nacc, I know what dictionary is, but what do you mean in relation to netplan?
[21:02] <nacc> enoch85: the yaml is being transformed into a dictionary
[21:02] <enoch85> nacc, aah ok
[21:02] <nacc> enoch85: so if you had read your original, as a dictionary, i think you would have seen the error immediately
[21:02] <cyphermox> I have code in progress that should improve the error reporting
[21:04] <nacc> cyphermox: nice
[21:04] <nacc> cyphermox: yeah there seem to be 'classes' of errors
[21:04] <nacc> from parse failures to structural issues