[16:32] <sakrecoer> ErichEickmeyer: I use telegram too, it came preinstalled on my ubuntuphone. :D i would defenitly join that group. i'll admit, at this point, i'm soon going to have a chat client per contact :D
[16:34] <sakrecoer> i'm in favour of any bridge that would make user conversation more accesible, as long as their is a good way of logging things, as i understood was OvenWerks concern.
[16:35] <sakrecoer> my reason being that loggin things publicly makes it searchable... although, i don't think any of my Search engine queries ever have led me to an IRC log... but that's annecdotic i suppose.
[16:36] <sakrecoer> on another note, i'll write something this weekend to officialize the transition to the council.
[16:36] <sakrecoer> i'll let you review it first.
[16:36] <sakrecoer> you=y'all
[16:41] <OvenWerks> sakrecoer: my concern was not about making sure things are logged. From what I have seen that will happen anyway.
[16:43] <OvenWerks> My concern is that in general irc is not logged and people expect what they say not to be logged. Bridging two services, one that is known logged and another that is assumed not logged could be a problem unless the bridged service (or those who use it) are made aware that it is logged.
[16:43] <sakrecoer> thanks for clarifying OvenWerks :)
[16:43] <sakrecoer> matrix channels do support channel topics...
[16:44] <sakrecoer> this said, not sure it's a priority of any kind, nor if -studio users are actually using matrix
[16:44] <OvenWerks> And of course, anyone can personally log what is a public channel anyway.
[16:45] <sakrecoer> good point :) that is my mindset with anything internet, except when calling home via ssh... and even then...  hehe
[16:46] <sakrecoer> to some extend, it is fair to say we could bridge the user channel with everything available, which would probably be a nightmare to manage...