[00:10] sdeziel: btw on bionic I needed to add 'k' on /home/sarnold/.msmtp.log to the msmpt profile === Aztec03 is now known as Panoptes [03:54] Hi! I have question. Read this link! [03:54] https://pastebin.com/MYjcPiL0 [04:56] good morning === Panoptes is now known as Aztec03 [07:17] Good morning === Aztec03 is now known as Panoptes === led_ir23 is now known as led_ir22 === miguel is now known as Guest52088 [12:57] sarnold: noted, thanks === beardfac1 is now known as beardface [13:05] sarnold: there was no rule for ~/.msmtp.log but what do you think of this https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/f76QH6bnYq/ ? [14:09] does anyone know how you can stop www-data from emailing you constantly? i keep getting mail from www-data every 10 minutes that awstat.conf was not able to access acccess.log file to modify it. i already went to /etc/logrotate.d/apache2 and modifed it to to "create 666 root adm" but i still get permission denied for awstat.conf to access /var/log/aapache2/access.log to write to [14:21] jr_admin: can the awstat user access the directory? [14:30] RoyK, how can i find out if he does or not [14:30] jr_admin: su -s /bin/bash - $username [14:31] where $username is the user running awstat [14:32] im sorry im a newb. but how do i find out whos running awstat..my guess is apache or im not sure of the official username [14:33] RoyK, i guess that would be the person whos logged in? or www-data? [14:42] jrahmy: not sure how awstat is run - is it a cronjob? [14:43] erm - that was meant for jr_admin, who just left === Panoptes is now known as Aztec03 [18:31] sdeziel: ah! looks good to me. I hadn't realized I specified the log location by hand :) [18:32] sarnold: great [19:06] Hey, is there a wiki page or something that explains the differences between subiquity and d-i in Bionic? [19:06] Just something that's kind of a high-level comparison explaining why we have two images for Ubuntu Server [19:09] I know there's a very small blurb about it in the release notes, but I was hoping for something more consumable for non-engineers. [19:20] ubuntu 18.04 LTS good ? [19:21] most folks seem to be liking it well enough [19:23] bladernr: subiquity and ubiquity you mean? [19:23] nacc, no, there are two Ubuntu Server images... one uses Subiquity and the other is d-i based. [19:24] nacc, the subiquity image is on releases.ubuntu.com while users are directed to cdimages.ubuntu.com for the d-i one [19:24] bladernr: both installers are available from the reqular ISO, aiui? [19:24] dpb1: --^ ? [19:24] ubuntu-18.04-server-live.iso vs ubuntu-18.04-server.iso... [19:26] live == new default installer based on subiquity; provides a more streamlined experience, ask less questions, and eventually enable more complex scenarios [19:27] the old ISO using d-i, also referred to as ubiquity, is still around to enable features that are not yet enabled in the live ISO [19:27] both are available at http://cdimages.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-server/ [19:27] powersj: thanks! [19:27] daily-live == subiquity, daily == ubiquity [19:28] i think the release notes also talk a bit about the differences and when you might need to use the old installer [19:31] nacc, yeah, the release notes were pretty light, I was just hoping for something like a side-by-side I could just easily pass along to partners when they ask. No worries though. [19:32] powersj, also thanks, I didn't realize the d-i server image was referred to as ubuiquity... ubiquity to me was always the live image on the Desktop ISO, I never really connected that name to the server iso [19:33] yeah, it is probably more accurate to say d-i [19:43] <_KaszpiR_> bladernr from my experience I can say preseed from xenial works under bonic [19:43] <_KaszpiR_> at least if using netboot [20:37] bladernr: yeah i'm not sure it's been done, but probably worth doing :)