[12:08] @mitya57 Hm, wanna just skip to 5.11? [12:09] Perhaps we can get it in experimental and then Ubuntu [12:09] Once it lands in Sid (5.11.1) it'll be properly "in sync" [12:09] How does that sound? [12:10] I think @acheronuk wanted to have 5.10 before 5.11. [12:10] Fwd from acheronuk: I ask as plasma 5.13 out 12th June needs 5.10 or greater [12:11] @acheronuk Thoughts? [12:12] I'm fine with whatever, but that just seems to make sense. :) [12:12] Ok then I am fine too :) [13:10] Is qtbase5-dev back to being installable in cosmic-proposed yet? [13:23] Good question. [13:36] @mamarley, yes [13:37] Awesome, thanks! [13:37] @tsimonq2, which makes sense? [13:39] 5.13 beta is out in 9 days time. I could builf that with the 5.10.1 I have in the Kubuntu CI repos if realy need be [13:44] @acheronuk, Let's do 5.11 then? [13:44] So we can get the .0 in the archive in time for Plasma. [13:47] ok. whichever makes best sense for Qt. If I need it sooner I can always to another test build for just amd64. That so far has been pretty trouble free to throw in a ppa somewhere [13:48] @tsimonq2, Sounds fine to me. According to the latest news it may be released on May 22nd. [13:48] 5.11.0? [13:48] interesting [13:48] Yeah, what's up with that, Qt releases are supposed to be late! [13:48] lisandro: Yes, see http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/releasing/2018-May/004643.html [13:48] choose between late or buggy! ;-) [13:49] Why not both? ;) [13:49] ah, missed the second paragraph it seems [13:50] @mamarley, Original plan 31.5.2018 [13:50] Updated plan 22.5.2018 [13:50] 😮 [13:50] amazing! [13:54] I'll be a DM on the next keyring update, so if lisandro or mitya57 wants to give me access, I can Just Do the 5.11 transition in Experimental. [13:55] Ofc we can collaborate, but I want to get used to uploading to Debian. ;) [13:55] experimental has no transitions ;-) [13:56] but yes, I'll give you access. I might review stuff before you upload, but just that [13:57] I will maybe want to review qtbase too, everything else should be simpler. [14:00] indeed [14:00] qtdeclaratve also needs reviewing [14:00] because of private symbols [14:00] * mitya57 agrees [14:13] No problem. [14:13] I'll be happy to get reviews before uploading. :)