[06:10] <oSoMoN> good morning desktoppers
[06:16] <duflu> Hi oSoMoN
[06:39] <oSoMoN> hey duflu
[07:56] <willcooke> morning all
[07:58] <willcooke> is anyone specifically looking at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1285258
[08:00] <duflu> willcooke, that looks like trusty. There are probably more relevant/current bugs in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bugs?field.tag=unlock
[08:01] <duflu> Morning willcooke
[08:01] <willcooke> hi duflu!  I dont see anything specific about that same issue in there, other than the bug I linked too
[08:01] <willcooke> like, nothing newer
[08:02] <duflu> willcooke, I guess my real question is whether you or someone is seeing it on bionic? I think we might have other newer password entry bugs open right now that would be more relevant
[08:02] <duflu> Just not tagged
[08:02] <willcooke> ah, right
[08:03] <willcooke> someone pinged me on twitter to say they're seeing it
[08:03] <willcooke> I'll get them to log a new bug
[08:03] <duflu> willcooke, yeah, thanks. We do have a constant trickle of such reports and have been able to deduplicate most
[08:05] <willcooke> ah
[08:05] <willcooke> hold on
[08:05] <willcooke> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1765261
[08:06] <duflu> I was thinking that but would wait for their bug report to verify
[08:06] <willcooke> ack
[08:06] <duflu> Also I haven't verified the 3.28.2 fix. It just sounds very much like it
[08:07] <willcooke> yeah
[08:07] <willcooke> kk, I've targetted that one
[08:07] <duflu> Particularly for passwords that start with Shift ;)
[08:07] <willcooke> :)
[08:08] <duflu> So in bionic you had a hard time if your screen was QHD or higher, or your password starts with a Shift combo. Weird but we got there...
[08:08] <willcooke> Still not as good as "can't print on Tuesday"]
[08:08] <willcooke> or was it Thursday
[08:08] <duflu> Ha
[08:09] <duflu> willcooke, that covers two of the three notable bionic regressions I reported a couple of weeks ago. The third one applies to old Intel GPUs (2007-2010)
[08:10] <duflu> Any older than 2007 and Mesa won't support you any more :(
[08:10] <duflu> Also 64-bit
[08:10] <willcooke> uh :(
[08:11] <duflu> willcooke, just see my email from 1 May
[09:02] <tjaalton> duflu: where?
[09:02] <tjaalton> the email
[09:02] <duflu> tjaalton, a private email
[09:03] <tjaalton> ok
[09:03] <duflu> tjaalton, in your inbox
[09:03] <tjaalton> thx
[09:10] <tjaalton> gen3 doesn't support native ogl2.x I think
[09:17] <duflu> tjaalton, re bug 1727356, I think it's a simpler problem than that. GL works - you just need to be using Xorg, not Wayland
[09:17] <tjaalton> ah right, wayland.. still weird that it wouldn't work
[09:18] <duflu> tjaalton, I have the hardware, just not yet the patience to set up such a slow machine for debugging
[09:19] <duflu> Still, it will bubble to the top of my list soonish
[09:22] <willcooke> Trevinho, I see you're working on this upstream: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm3/+bug/1766137
[09:22] <willcooke> can I assign that LP bug to you>?
[09:22] <duflu> willcooke, yeah I assumed it was mine :)
[09:23] <duflu> Oops, wrong bug
[09:23] <duflu> willcooke, the password one is just waiting for gnome 3.28.2, so Jeremy
[09:23] <willcooke> Well, is it though?  Are they the same root cause?
[09:23] <tjaalton> gen4 is oldest I have
[09:23] <tjaalton> 965gm
[09:24] <duflu> willcooke, sorry, wrong bug again. 1766137 was in progress with Laney...?
[09:25] <duflu> Laney was working on it in gitlab before it moved into bugzilla
[09:27] <Laney> it's being worked on
[09:28] <Laney> if that's 227 /  the new gnome bug for it
[09:28] <duflu> In other news, if you have to jump to source code like 17607, there's probably something wrong
[09:28] <duflu> -like +line
[09:30] <duflu> willcooke, https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/227
[09:30] <ubot5-ng> GNOME bug 227 in gnome-shell "Login fails when preceded by incorrect password" (comments: 22) [Closed]
[10:13] <oSoMoN> chrisccoulson, hey are you around? the chromium-browser update to 66.0.3359.139 is ready in ppa:canonical-chromium-builds/stage (for xenial, artful and bionic)
[10:54] <Trevinho> willcooke: hey, also Laney was doing it, so not assigned to me as was for both :-)
[11:02] <willcooke> Trevinho, kk
[11:03] <willcooke> Trevinho, I've targetted it for B so (hopefully) we will pick it up next week
[11:04] <Trevinho> willcooke: yeah, the fix is there, just waiting for upstream
[11:04] <willcooke> cool
[11:08] <Laney> right it's already picked up
[11:23] <Laney> one day I'll make that p11-kit bug happen :(
[11:36] <popey> Hm, I'm seeing a reall odd lag issue with the firefox snap in stable.
[11:37] <popey> Switching tabs sometimes gives me a spinner in the middle of  a blank tab, and trying to highlight text just doesn't work, like it's blocked.
[11:37] <popey> but a few seconds later it works.
[11:38] <popey> Does anyone here use the firefox snap in anger?
[11:38] <popey> (no other app does it)
[11:55] <willcooke> popey, kenvandine does he'll be on in a couple of hours
[12:14] <kenvandine> popey, yo
[12:16] <kenvandine> popey, i've never seen that issue
[12:49] <popey> ok
[13:06] <willcooke> bah, I need to create some routing rules to stop passing everything over the VPN
[13:22] <[Kid]> is there a way in 18.04 to have Skype flash on new message like in Unity?
[13:23] <popey> Do you not get a little blob in the skype icon in the indicator area?
[13:28] <[Kid]> i do, so maybe that is what i have to get used to
[13:29] <[Kid]> i am used to unity flashing the icon on the dock
[13:44] <popey> oh i see, yes.
[14:18] <kenvandine> oSoMoN, can you try to run gnome-contacts from the candidate channel?
[14:18] <kenvandine> oSoMoN, specifically any idea why every executable we try to run in desktop-launch set faults... but the snap actually works :)
[14:19] <kenvandine> oSoMoN, something's up with our classic snaps
[14:47] <oSoMoN> kenvandine, sorry I missed your messages (but got a notification on telegram), my internet went down
[14:47] <kenvandine> oSoMoN, no worries
[14:47] <kenvandine> it's weird though, things like mkdir are segfaulting
[14:48] <kenvandine> just for the classic snap
[14:48] <kenvandine> i'm thinking it's probably related to the preload
[14:48] <kenvandine> not playing well with a classic snap
[14:48] <kenvandine> oSoMoN, but wanted your insight :)
[14:49] <oSoMoN> kenvandine, the snap to test is gnome-contacts, right?
[14:49] <kenvandine> oSoMoN, ln also segfaults
[14:49] <kenvandine> yes
[14:49] <kenvandine> candidate channel
[14:49] <oSoMoN> trying now
[14:50] <oSoMoN> wow, it looks like every single command in the desktop-launch script segfaults
[14:50] <kenvandine> exactly
[14:53] <oSoMoN> kenvandine, we can easily check whether the preload thing is causing the problem, by rebuilding the snap without it
[14:56] <Laney> oSoMoN: you can copy the desktop-launch script somewhere and then bind mount it over the one in the snap
[14:56] <Laney> then it's editable
[14:57] <oSoMoN> ah, that's an elegant alternative to using the rebuild-snap big hammer
[14:58] <oSoMoN> kenvandine, confirmed, the app runs when bindtextdomain.so is not in the snap
[15:04] <Laney> laney@nightingale> SNAP=/snap/gnome-contacts/39/ LD_PRELOAD=/snap/gnome-contacts/39/bindtextdomain.so:/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6:/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdl.so.2 mkdir /tmp/a                                           ~SNAP
[15:04] <Laney> mkdir: cannot create directory ‘/tmp/a’: File exists
[15:04] <Laney> laney@nightingale> SNAP=/snap/gnome-contacts/39/ LD_PRELOAD=/snap/gnome-contacts/39/bindtextdomain.so:/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 mkdir /tmp/a                                                                            ~SNAP
[15:04] <Laney> [1]    26689 segmentation fault (core dumped)  SNAP=/snap/gnome-contacts/39/ LD_PRELOAD= mkdir -v /tmp/a
[15:04] <Laney> something to do with the libdl in the snap anyway
[15:06] <kenvandine> that's concerning, since all the libs should be coming from 16.04 in the snap and core rather than the host
[15:06] <Laney> they do
[15:06] <Laney> but in that commandline I tell it to use my host one and it starts working
[15:07] <kenvandine> right... it shouldn't though right?
[15:07] <Laney> seems weird
[15:07] <Laney> how's this thing built?
[15:07] <kenvandine> or maybe it's just missing?
[15:07] <kenvandine> on LP
[15:07] <Laney> link to the build?
[15:07] <kenvandine> https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-desktop/+snap/gnome-contacts/+build/214308
[15:08] <Laney> the .so is built each time?
[15:08] <kenvandine> yes
[15:09] <Laney> hmmmmm
[15:12] <Laney> would be good if there were ddebs :<
[16:12] <jbicha> Trevinho: are you around today?
[16:12] <Trevinho> jbicha: yep
[16:13] <jbicha> Trevinho: I'm thinking about disabling the LP: #1764558 mutter patch for cosmic and bionic
[16:21] <Trevinho> jbicha: let me look at it, I just wanted to find a proper way to reproduce
[16:22] <jbicha> ok, I can wait :)
[17:05] <willcooke> night all
[17:56] <hyperair> hey does the gtk-color-scheme key in org.gnome.desktop.interface no longer work on gtk2 applications?
[17:57] <hyperair> i seem to hae lost my gtk2 color scheme customizations after upgrading from artful to bionic :/
[18:04] <oSoMoN> have a good evening everyone
[23:50] <robert_ancell> jbicha, looks like the updated image didn't work in bug 1768557