[06:10] good morning desktoppers [06:16] Hi oSoMoN [06:39] hey duflu === pstolowski|afk is now known as pstolowski [07:56] morning all [07:58] is anyone specifically looking at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1285258 [07:58] Ubuntu bug 1285258 in gnome-shell (Ubuntu) "sometimes GNOME screen lock fails to unlock after password entered" [High,Triaged] [08:00] willcooke, that looks like trusty. There are probably more relevant/current bugs in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bugs?field.tag=unlock [08:01] Morning willcooke [08:01] hi duflu! I dont see anything specific about that same issue in there, other than the bug I linked too [08:01] like, nothing newer [08:02] willcooke, I guess my real question is whether you or someone is seeing it on bionic? I think we might have other newer password entry bugs open right now that would be more relevant [08:02] Just not tagged [08:02] ah, right [08:03] someone pinged me on twitter to say they're seeing it [08:03] I'll get them to log a new bug [08:03] willcooke, yeah, thanks. We do have a constant trickle of such reports and have been able to deduplicate most [08:05] ah [08:05] hold on [08:05] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1765261 [08:05] Ubuntu bug 1765261 in gnome-shell (Ubuntu) "[regression] Ubuntu 18.04 login screen rejects a valid password on first attempt. Usually works on the second attempt" [High,In progress] [08:06] I was thinking that but would wait for their bug report to verify [08:06] ack [08:06] Also I haven't verified the 3.28.2 fix. It just sounds very much like it [08:07] yeah [08:07] kk, I've targetted that one [08:07] Particularly for passwords that start with Shift ;) [08:07] :) [08:08] So in bionic you had a hard time if your screen was QHD or higher, or your password starts with a Shift combo. Weird but we got there... [08:08] Still not as good as "can't print on Tuesday"] [08:08] or was it Thursday [08:08] Ha [08:09] willcooke, that covers two of the three notable bionic regressions I reported a couple of weeks ago. The third one applies to old Intel GPUs (2007-2010) [08:10] Any older than 2007 and Mesa won't support you any more :( [08:10] Also 64-bit [08:10] uh :( [08:11] willcooke, just see my email from 1 May [09:02] duflu: where? [09:02] the email [09:02] tjaalton, a private email [09:03] ok [09:03] tjaalton, in your inbox [09:03] thx [09:10] gen3 doesn't support native ogl2.x I think [09:17] tjaalton, re bug 1727356, I think it's a simpler problem than that. GL works - you just need to be using Xorg, not Wayland [09:17] bug 1727356 in mutter (Ubuntu) "Wayland sessions (including the login screen itself) don't start up on older Intel GPUs." [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1727356 [09:17] ah right, wayland.. still weird that it wouldn't work [09:18] tjaalton, I have the hardware, just not yet the patience to set up such a slow machine for debugging [09:19] Still, it will bubble to the top of my list soonish [09:22] Trevinho, I see you're working on this upstream: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm3/+bug/1766137 [09:22] Ubuntu bug 1766137 in gdm3 (Ubuntu) "[regression] Password accepted but login fails (blank purple screen and mouse pointer only)" [High,In progress] [09:22] can I assign that LP bug to you>? [09:22] willcooke, yeah I assumed it was mine :) [09:23] Oops, wrong bug [09:23] willcooke, the password one is just waiting for gnome 3.28.2, so Jeremy [09:23] Well, is it though? Are they the same root cause? [09:23] gen4 is oldest I have [09:23] 965gm [09:24] willcooke, sorry, wrong bug again. 1766137 was in progress with Laney...? [09:25] Laney was working on it in gitlab before it moved into bugzilla [09:27] it's being worked on [09:28] if that's 227 / the new gnome bug for it [09:28] In other news, if you have to jump to source code like 17607, there's probably something wrong [09:28] -like +line [09:30] willcooke, https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/227 [09:30] GNOME bug 227 in gnome-shell "Login fails when preceded by incorrect password" (comments: 22) [Closed] [09:30] Error: Gnome bug 227 could not be found [10:13] chrisccoulson, hey are you around? the chromium-browser update to 66.0.3359.139 is ready in ppa:canonical-chromium-builds/stage (for xenial, artful and bionic) [10:54] willcooke: hey, also Laney was doing it, so not assigned to me as was for both :-) [11:02] Trevinho, kk [11:03] Trevinho, I've targetted it for B so (hopefully) we will pick it up next week [11:04] willcooke: yeah, the fix is there, just waiting for upstream [11:04] cool [11:08] right it's already picked up [11:23] one day I'll make that p11-kit bug happen :( [11:36] Hm, I'm seeing a reall odd lag issue with the firefox snap in stable. [11:37] Switching tabs sometimes gives me a spinner in the middle of a blank tab, and trying to highlight text just doesn't work, like it's blocked. [11:37] but a few seconds later it works. [11:38] Does anyone here use the firefox snap in anger? [11:38] (no other app does it) [11:55] popey, kenvandine does he'll be on in a couple of hours [12:14] popey, yo [12:16] popey, i've never seen that issue [12:49] ok [13:06] bah, I need to create some routing rules to stop passing everything over the VPN [13:22] <[Kid]> is there a way in 18.04 to have Skype flash on new message like in Unity? [13:23] Do you not get a little blob in the skype icon in the indicator area? [13:28] <[Kid]> i do, so maybe that is what i have to get used to [13:29] <[Kid]> i am used to unity flashing the icon on the dock [13:44] oh i see, yes. [14:18] oSoMoN, can you try to run gnome-contacts from the candidate channel? [14:18] oSoMoN, specifically any idea why every executable we try to run in desktop-launch set faults... but the snap actually works :) [14:19] oSoMoN, something's up with our classic snaps [14:47] kenvandine, sorry I missed your messages (but got a notification on telegram), my internet went down [14:47] oSoMoN, no worries [14:47] it's weird though, things like mkdir are segfaulting [14:48] just for the classic snap [14:48] i'm thinking it's probably related to the preload [14:48] not playing well with a classic snap [14:48] oSoMoN, but wanted your insight :) [14:49] kenvandine, the snap to test is gnome-contacts, right? [14:49] oSoMoN, ln also segfaults [14:49] yes [14:49] candidate channel [14:49] trying now [14:50] wow, it looks like every single command in the desktop-launch script segfaults [14:50] exactly [14:53] kenvandine, we can easily check whether the preload thing is causing the problem, by rebuilding the snap without it [14:56] oSoMoN: you can copy the desktop-launch script somewhere and then bind mount it over the one in the snap [14:56] then it's editable [14:57] ah, that's an elegant alternative to using the rebuild-snap big hammer [14:58] kenvandine, confirmed, the app runs when bindtextdomain.so is not in the snap [15:04] laney@nightingale> SNAP=/snap/gnome-contacts/39/ LD_PRELOAD=/snap/gnome-contacts/39/bindtextdomain.so:/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6:/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdl.so.2 mkdir /tmp/a ~SNAP [15:04] mkdir: cannot create directory ‘/tmp/a’: File exists [15:04] laney@nightingale> SNAP=/snap/gnome-contacts/39/ LD_PRELOAD=/snap/gnome-contacts/39/bindtextdomain.so:/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 mkdir /tmp/a ~SNAP [15:04] [1] 26689 segmentation fault (core dumped) SNAP=/snap/gnome-contacts/39/ LD_PRELOAD= mkdir -v /tmp/a [15:04] something to do with the libdl in the snap anyway [15:06] that's concerning, since all the libs should be coming from 16.04 in the snap and core rather than the host [15:06] they do [15:06] but in that commandline I tell it to use my host one and it starts working [15:07] right... it shouldn't though right? [15:07] seems weird [15:07] how's this thing built? [15:07] or maybe it's just missing? [15:07] on LP [15:07] link to the build? [15:07] https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-desktop/+snap/gnome-contacts/+build/214308 [15:08] the .so is built each time? [15:08] yes [15:09] hmmmmm [15:12] would be good if there were ddebs :< [16:12] Trevinho: are you around today? [16:12] jbicha: yep [16:13] Trevinho: I'm thinking about disabling the LP: #1764558 mutter patch for cosmic and bionic [16:13] Launchpad bug 1764558 in mutter (Ubuntu) "Window buttons icon effect isn't applied to mutter decorations" [Medium,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1764558 === pstolowski is now known as pstolowski|afk [16:21] jbicha: let me look at it, I just wanted to find a proper way to reproduce [16:22] ok, I can wait :) [17:05] night all [17:56] hey does the gtk-color-scheme key in org.gnome.desktop.interface no longer work on gtk2 applications? [17:57] i seem to hae lost my gtk2 color scheme customizations after upgrading from artful to bionic :/ [18:04] have a good evening everyone [23:50] jbicha, looks like the updated image didn't work in bug 1768557 [23:50] bug 1768557 in gnome-initial-setup (Ubuntu Bionic) "Update what's new graphic for Welcome to Ubuntu wizard" [Low,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1768557