[02:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: flatpak (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.11.3-3 => 0.11.7-0ubuntu0.1] (ubuntugnome)
[03:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: llvm-toolchain-snapshot [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1:7~svn331965-1] (no packageset)
[06:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libvirt (artful-proposed/main) [3.6.0-1ubuntu6.6 => 3.6.0-1ubuntu6.7] (ubuntu-server, virt)
[06:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libvirt (bionic-proposed/main) [4.0.0-1ubuntu8 => 4.0.0-1ubuntu8.1] (ubuntu-server, virt)
[06:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libvirt (xenial-proposed/main) [1.3.1-1ubuntu10.22 => 1.3.1-1ubuntu10.23] (ubuntu-server, virt)
[07:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: munin (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.0.37-1 => 2.0.37-1ubuntu0.1] (no packageset)
[07:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libvirt [source] (artful-proposed) [3.6.0-1ubuntu6.7]
[07:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libvirt [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.3.1-1ubuntu10.23]
[07:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libvirt [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.0.0-1ubuntu8.1]
[07:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted horizon [source] (artful-proposed) [3:12.0.2-0ubuntu1.1]
[07:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted horizon [source] (bionic-proposed) [3:13.0.0-0ubuntu1.1]
[07:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted flatpak [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.11.7-0ubuntu0.1]
[07:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted alsa-lib [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.3-5ubuntu0.1]
[07:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted munin [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.0.37-1ubuntu0.1]
[07:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox-ext-pack [source] (bionic-proposed) [5.2.10-3ubuntu18.04.1]
[07:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rasdaemon [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.6.0-1ubuntu0.1]
[09:24] <LocutusOfBorg> tjaalton, can we please have a zero day SRU for this bug? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virtualbox-ext-pack/+bug/1767402
[09:24] <LocutusOfBorg> I confirm the fix, and this breaks upgrades from xenial and artful
[09:24] <LocutusOfBorg> I got this morning the "upgrade now" window, so better push in updates soon to avoid another 20 bug reports each day
[09:32] <tjaalton> LocutusOfBorg: fine by me if someone else acks it
[09:34] <apw> LocutusOfBorg, the only concern is that it is a friday, and we don't normally release things on a friday
[09:35] <LocutusOfBorg> apw, I know that, and I never asked for an exception on friday, but people will upgrade in this weekend...
[09:35] <LocutusOfBorg> btw, you can see the old and new hash here
[09:35] <LocutusOfBorg> https://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/5.2.10/SHA256SUMS
[09:35] <apw> LocutusOfBorg, i think you are saying the package is utterly broken as it is, so the new cannot possibly be any worse ?
[09:35] <LocutusOfBorg> one hash changed, upstream changed the symlink to point to the new release
[09:35] <LocutusOfBorg> apw, it doesn't even install! the hash verification fails
[09:35] <LocutusOfBorg> yes, no way you can install it
[09:35] <apw> right, and i think i reviewed that SRU, and it was just a one line change
[09:36] <apw> so given what is in the archive won't even pass apt-get install and the change is visually trivial
[09:36] <LocutusOfBorg> upstream left the old ext-pack on the download page, but changed the symlink and I download that one
[09:36] <apw> and even if you got it wrong, it is hard for it to be any differnt from what is there, uninstallable
[09:36] <apw> i think you could argue for a release of it today; especially given it is trashing upgraders
[09:37] <LocutusOfBorg> maybe starting from next vbox release, I'll point to the Oracle_VM_VirtualBox_Extension_Pack-5.2.10-122406.vbox-extpack file
[09:37] <LocutusOfBorg> but maintaining the "122406" number is PITA, because it is the upstream internal release, nothing I can trivially grab with not that much error rate
[09:37] <LocutusOfBorg> so, if you could release I'll love that
[09:44] <LocutusOfBorg> today I turn on release 3.0 so it would be a nice birthday gift :)
[09:47] <apw> LocutusOfBorg, ok bug updated, and released
[09:52] <LocutusOfBorg> <3 thanks!
[10:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-meta-oem (xenial-proposed/universe) [4.13.0.1027.31 => 4.13.0.1027.32] (kernel) (sync)
[10:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-meta-oem [sync] (xenial-proposed) [4.13.0.1027.32]
[10:18] <acheronuk> LocutusOfBorg: vlc needs rebuilding for new x265?
[10:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oem [amd64] (xenial-proposed/universe) [4.13.0-1027.30] (kernel)
[10:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.13.0-1027.30]
[11:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kraft [s390x] (cosmic-proposed/none) [0.80-1] (no packageset)
[11:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kraft [i386] (cosmic-proposed/none) [0.80-1] (no packageset)
[11:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kraft [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed/none) [0.80-1] (no packageset)
[11:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kraft [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/none) [0.80-1] (no packageset)
[11:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kraft [arm64] (cosmic-proposed/none) [0.80-1] (no packageset)
[11:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kraft [armhf] (cosmic-proposed/none) [0.80-1] (no packageset)
[11:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (bionic-proposed/main) [2.32.5+18.04 => 2.32.7+18.04] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[12:37]  * apw looks at ^ snapd
[12:38] <Laney> infinity: can we build bionic images with PROPOSED=1?
[12:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected snapd [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.32.6+18.04]
[12:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected snapd [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.32.7+18.04]
[13:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kraft [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [0.80-1]
[13:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kraft [armhf] (cosmic-proposed) [0.80-1]
[13:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kraft [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed) [0.80-1]
[13:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libpam-x2go [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [0.0.2.0-2]
[13:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libpam-x2go [armhf] (cosmic-proposed) [0.0.2.0-2]
[13:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libpam-x2go [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed) [0.0.2.0-2]
[13:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted llvm-toolchain-snapshot [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [1:7~svn331965-1]
[13:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kraft [arm64] (cosmic-proposed) [0.80-1]
[13:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kraft [s390x] (cosmic-proposed) [0.80-1]
[13:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libpam-x2go [i386] (cosmic-proposed) [0.0.2.0-2]
[13:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mpl-scatter-density [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [0.3-2]
[13:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kraft [i386] (cosmic-proposed) [0.80-1]
[13:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libpam-x2go [s390x] (cosmic-proposed) [0.0.2.0-2]
[13:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libpam-x2go [arm64] (cosmic-proposed) [0.0.2.0-2]
[13:45] <Odd_Bloke> Why did snapd get rejected?  (Is there a way for me to find out why or at least who myself?)
[14:00] <apw> Odd_Bloke, no i don't think you can find out, i think it is logged somewhere you cannot see
[14:00] <apw> Odd_Bloke, though as i said i was looking at it just before it got rejected you can
[14:01] <apw> Odd_Bloke, intuit it was me; the first was rejected because the second exists
[14:01] <apw> Odd_Bloke, the second because a .8 is expected for all series "imminently"
[14:01] <Odd_Bloke> Aha, OK.
[14:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (artful-proposed/main) [2.32.5+17.10 => 2.32.8+17.10] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[14:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (bionic-proposed/main) [2.32.5+18.04 => 2.32.8+18.04] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[14:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (trusty-proposed/universe) [2.32.5~14.04 => 2.32.8~14.04] (no packageset)
[14:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (xenial-proposed/main) [2.32.5 => 2.32.8] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[14:08] <apw> Odd_Bloke, and here they come
[14:08]  * apw is looking at snapd
[14:08] <Odd_Bloke> BUT HOW DO I TELL
[14:08] <Odd_Bloke> ;)
[14:09] <rbasak> sru-review will comment the reject message on the bug. But I tend to reject from the Launchpad web UI before I even get to running sru-review, so that doesn't usually happen for me.
[14:16] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks acheronuk :)
[14:19] <apw> indeed
[14:21]  * apw imagines Odd_Bloke as a grown up 'roly'
[14:24] <Odd_Bloke> apw: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roly ?
[14:28] <apw> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hey_Duggee
[14:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openexr [s390x] (cosmic-proposed/main) [2.2.1-4] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[14:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openexr [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/main) [2.2.1-4] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[14:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openexr [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed/main) [2.2.1-4] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[14:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openexr [i386] (cosmic-proposed/main) [2.2.1-4] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[14:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.32.8+18.04]
[14:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openexr [arm64] (cosmic-proposed/main) [2.2.1-4] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[14:52] <apw> ^ snapd .8 accepted into bionic, we have a .5 pending which will release on monday, so holding the others
[14:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openexr [armhf] (cosmic-proposed/main) [2.2.1-4] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[15:39] <coreycb> tjaalton, hello, if you have a chance these SRUs should be ready to promote to -updates:
[15:39] <coreycb> artful: bug 1763320, bionic: bug 1767128, bug 1750777
[15:53] <jbicha> slangasek: please remove src: elementary from cosmic so that we can finish the efl transition, Debian bug 895221
[16:03] <jbicha> and bug 1770680
[16:10] <sil2100> coreycb: we generally don't do Friday releases
[16:10] <sil2100> coreycb: so in most cases such things need to wait for Monday
[16:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openexr [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [2.2.1-4]
[16:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openexr [armhf] (cosmic-proposed) [2.2.1-4]
[16:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openexr [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed) [2.2.1-4]
[16:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openexr [arm64] (cosmic-proposed) [2.2.1-4]
[16:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openexr [s390x] (cosmic-proposed) [2.2.1-4]
[16:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openexr [i386] (cosmic-proposed) [2.2.1-4]
[17:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hashcheck [s390x] (cosmic-proposed/none) [1.0.0-1] (no packageset)
[17:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hashcheck [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed/none) [1.0.0-1] (no packageset)
[17:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: braceexpand [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/none) [0.1.2-1] (no packageset)
[17:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hashcheck [i386] (cosmic-proposed/none) [1.0.0-1] (no packageset)
[17:24] <coreycb> sil2100: sure, that's fine
[17:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: inifile [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/none) [0.4-1] (no packageset)
[17:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hashcheck [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/none) [1.0.0-1] (no packageset)
[17:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-typeguard [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/none) [2.1.4-1] (no packageset)
[17:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted braceexpand [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [0.1.2-1]
[17:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-typeguard [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [2.1.4-1]
[17:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted inifile [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [0.4-1]
[18:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hashcheck [arm64] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-1] (no packageset)
[18:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hashcheck [armhf] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-1] (no packageset)
[18:15] <infinity> Laney: We can, and committed.
[18:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hashcheck [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [1.0.0-1]
[18:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hashcheck [armhf] (cosmic-proposed) [1.0.0-1]
[18:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hashcheck [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed) [1.0.0-1]
[18:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hashcheck [arm64] (cosmic-proposed) [1.0.0-1]
[18:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hashcheck [s390x] (cosmic-proposed) [1.0.0-1]
[18:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hashcheck [i386] (cosmic-proposed) [1.0.0-1]
[19:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ilmbase [s390x] (cosmic-proposed/main) [2.2.1-2] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[19:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ilmbase [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/main) [2.2.1-2] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[19:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ilmbase [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed/main) [2.2.1-2] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[19:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ilmbase [arm64] (cosmic-proposed/main) [2.2.1-2] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[19:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ilmbase [armhf] (cosmic-proposed/main) [2.2.1-2] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[19:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-ovsdbapp [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/main) [0.9.1-2ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server)
[19:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ilmbase [i386] (cosmic-proposed/main) [2.2.1-2] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[19:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ilmbase [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [2.2.1-2]
[19:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ilmbase [armhf] (cosmic-proposed) [2.2.1-2]
[19:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ilmbase [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed) [2.2.1-2]
[19:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ilmbase [arm64] (cosmic-proposed) [2.2.1-2]
[19:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ilmbase [s390x] (cosmic-proposed) [2.2.1-2]
[19:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ilmbase [i386] (cosmic-proposed) [2.2.1-2]
[19:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-ovsdbapp [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [0.9.1-2ubuntu1]
[19:57] <slangasek> jbicha: elementary shows as having two revdeps in Ubuntu (intone, terminology); will those also fall out for me via process-removals?
[20:03] <slangasek> jbicha: ok, I see we have an soname change (libelementary2 -> libelementary1), and rebuilds in cosmic-proposed; and that transitioning renders the libs uninstallable; I'll do this as a force hint to make sure it goes through, then clean up elementary after
[20:14] <doko> slangasek: please see #ubuntu-devel. jbicha is intentionally dropping patches which we added for MIR inclusion, and forcing the merging work on others. I don't see this appropriate behavior
[20:27] <infinity> tsimonq2: Is there any point in lubuntu-core?  It's so tiny as to be a completely useless thing if installed on its own, and your seeds would be less complex if you just rolled it into desktop.
[20:27] <doko> jbicha: please see https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ilmbase/+bug/1770748
[20:28] <infinity> tsimonq2: (and if you genuinely think there's a point in core, your seeds are wrong and need fixing :P)
[20:28]  * tsimonq2 hands infinity an ace
[20:28] <tsimonq2> *axe
[20:28] <tsimonq2> Wanna do it?
[20:28] <infinity> tsimonq2: Move core into desktop?  Sure.  I'm already here and committing.
[20:29] <tsimonq2> OK.
[20:30] <flocculant> doko: do you mean inappropriate?
[20:31] <doko> whatever
[20:32] <flocculant> sigh
[20:33] <infinity> tsimonq2: Also, is it intentional that your desktop doesn't depend on desktop-common like everyone else's, or was that snowflakiness a mistake?
[20:35] <infinity> tsimonq2: Ahh, might have been because of no-follow-recommends, you had to duplicate desktop-common?
[21:01] <slangasek> doko: I'm off work today and just happened to be at the keyboard to respond to jbicha's ping.  I certainly agree with the principle that deltas shouldn't be dropped on update without a good reason, but I'm not sure what you want by invoking me in particular.  Maybe you mean to invoke the TB instead?
[21:12] <doko> slangasek: sure, that's the better option