=== Elizabeth_ is now known as Elizabeth [02:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: flatpak (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.11.3-3 => 0.11.7-0ubuntu0.1] (ubuntugnome) [03:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: llvm-toolchain-snapshot [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1:7~svn331965-1] (no packageset) [06:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libvirt (artful-proposed/main) [3.6.0-1ubuntu6.6 => 3.6.0-1ubuntu6.7] (ubuntu-server, virt) [06:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libvirt (bionic-proposed/main) [4.0.0-1ubuntu8 => 4.0.0-1ubuntu8.1] (ubuntu-server, virt) [06:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libvirt (xenial-proposed/main) [1.3.1-1ubuntu10.22 => 1.3.1-1ubuntu10.23] (ubuntu-server, virt) [07:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: munin (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.0.37-1 => 2.0.37-1ubuntu0.1] (no packageset) [07:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libvirt [source] (artful-proposed) [3.6.0-1ubuntu6.7] [07:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libvirt [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.3.1-1ubuntu10.23] [07:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libvirt [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.0.0-1ubuntu8.1] [07:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted horizon [source] (artful-proposed) [3:12.0.2-0ubuntu1.1] [07:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted horizon [source] (bionic-proposed) [3:13.0.0-0ubuntu1.1] [07:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted flatpak [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.11.7-0ubuntu0.1] [07:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted alsa-lib [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.3-5ubuntu0.1] [07:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted munin [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.0.37-1ubuntu0.1] [07:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox-ext-pack [source] (bionic-proposed) [5.2.10-3ubuntu18.04.1] [07:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rasdaemon [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.6.0-1ubuntu0.1] === andrewc is now known as andrewc-afk === andrewc-afk is now known as andrewc [09:24] tjaalton, can we please have a zero day SRU for this bug? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virtualbox-ext-pack/+bug/1767402 [09:24] Ubuntu bug 1767402 in virtualbox-ext-pack (Ubuntu Bionic) "[SRU] hash mismatch or wrong accept-license key trying to install virtualbox-ext-pack 5.2.10" [Critical,Fix committed] [09:24] I confirm the fix, and this breaks upgrades from xenial and artful [09:24] I got this morning the "upgrade now" window, so better push in updates soon to avoid another 20 bug reports each day [09:32] LocutusOfBorg: fine by me if someone else acks it [09:34] LocutusOfBorg, the only concern is that it is a friday, and we don't normally release things on a friday [09:35] apw, I know that, and I never asked for an exception on friday, but people will upgrade in this weekend... [09:35] btw, you can see the old and new hash here [09:35] https://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/5.2.10/SHA256SUMS [09:35] LocutusOfBorg, i think you are saying the package is utterly broken as it is, so the new cannot possibly be any worse ? [09:35] one hash changed, upstream changed the symlink to point to the new release [09:35] apw, it doesn't even install! the hash verification fails [09:35] yes, no way you can install it [09:35] right, and i think i reviewed that SRU, and it was just a one line change [09:36] so given what is in the archive won't even pass apt-get install and the change is visually trivial [09:36] upstream left the old ext-pack on the download page, but changed the symlink and I download that one [09:36] and even if you got it wrong, it is hard for it to be any differnt from what is there, uninstallable [09:36] i think you could argue for a release of it today; especially given it is trashing upgraders [09:37] maybe starting from next vbox release, I'll point to the Oracle_VM_VirtualBox_Extension_Pack-5.2.10-122406.vbox-extpack file [09:37] but maintaining the "122406" number is PITA, because it is the upstream internal release, nothing I can trivially grab with not that much error rate [09:37] so, if you could release I'll love that [09:44] today I turn on release 3.0 so it would be a nice birthday gift :) [09:47] LocutusOfBorg, ok bug updated, and released [09:52] <3 thanks! [10:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-meta-oem (xenial-proposed/universe) [4.13.0.1027.31 => 4.13.0.1027.32] (kernel) (sync) [10:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-meta-oem [sync] (xenial-proposed) [4.13.0.1027.32] [10:18] LocutusOfBorg: vlc needs rebuilding for new x265? [10:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oem [amd64] (xenial-proposed/universe) [4.13.0-1027.30] (kernel) [10:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.13.0-1027.30] [11:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kraft [s390x] (cosmic-proposed/none) [0.80-1] (no packageset) [11:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kraft [i386] (cosmic-proposed/none) [0.80-1] (no packageset) [11:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kraft [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed/none) [0.80-1] (no packageset) [11:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kraft [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/none) [0.80-1] (no packageset) [11:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kraft [arm64] (cosmic-proposed/none) [0.80-1] (no packageset) [11:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kraft [armhf] (cosmic-proposed/none) [0.80-1] (no packageset) [11:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (bionic-proposed/main) [2.32.5+18.04 => 2.32.7+18.04] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) [12:37] * apw looks at ^ snapd [12:38] infinity: can we build bionic images with PROPOSED=1? [12:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected snapd [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.32.6+18.04] [12:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected snapd [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.32.7+18.04] === Guest65791 is now known as _hc [13:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kraft [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [0.80-1] [13:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kraft [armhf] (cosmic-proposed) [0.80-1] [13:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kraft [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed) [0.80-1] [13:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libpam-x2go [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [0.0.2.0-2] [13:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libpam-x2go [armhf] (cosmic-proposed) [0.0.2.0-2] [13:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libpam-x2go [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed) [0.0.2.0-2] [13:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted llvm-toolchain-snapshot [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [1:7~svn331965-1] [13:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kraft [arm64] (cosmic-proposed) [0.80-1] [13:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kraft [s390x] (cosmic-proposed) [0.80-1] [13:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libpam-x2go [i386] (cosmic-proposed) [0.0.2.0-2] [13:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mpl-scatter-density [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [0.3-2] [13:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kraft [i386] (cosmic-proposed) [0.80-1] [13:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libpam-x2go [s390x] (cosmic-proposed) [0.0.2.0-2] [13:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libpam-x2go [arm64] (cosmic-proposed) [0.0.2.0-2] [13:45] Why did snapd get rejected? (Is there a way for me to find out why or at least who myself?) [14:00] Odd_Bloke, no i don't think you can find out, i think it is logged somewhere you cannot see [14:00] Odd_Bloke, though as i said i was looking at it just before it got rejected you can [14:01] Odd_Bloke, intuit it was me; the first was rejected because the second exists [14:01] Odd_Bloke, the second because a .8 is expected for all series "imminently" [14:01] Aha, OK. [14:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (artful-proposed/main) [2.32.5+17.10 => 2.32.8+17.10] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) [14:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (bionic-proposed/main) [2.32.5+18.04 => 2.32.8+18.04] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) [14:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (trusty-proposed/universe) [2.32.5~14.04 => 2.32.8~14.04] (no packageset) [14:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (xenial-proposed/main) [2.32.5 => 2.32.8] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) [14:08] Odd_Bloke, and here they come [14:08] * apw is looking at snapd [14:08] BUT HOW DO I TELL [14:08] ;) [14:09] sru-review will comment the reject message on the bug. But I tend to reject from the Launchpad web UI before I even get to running sru-review, so that doesn't usually happen for me. [14:16] thanks acheronuk :) [14:19] indeed [14:21] * apw imagines Odd_Bloke as a grown up 'roly' [14:24] apw: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roly ? [14:28] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hey_Duggee [14:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openexr [s390x] (cosmic-proposed/main) [2.2.1-4] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) [14:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openexr [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/main) [2.2.1-4] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) [14:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openexr [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed/main) [2.2.1-4] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) [14:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openexr [i386] (cosmic-proposed/main) [2.2.1-4] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) [14:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.32.8+18.04] [14:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openexr [arm64] (cosmic-proposed/main) [2.2.1-4] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) [14:52] ^ snapd .8 accepted into bionic, we have a .5 pending which will release on monday, so holding the others [14:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openexr [armhf] (cosmic-proposed/main) [2.2.1-4] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) [15:39] tjaalton, hello, if you have a chance these SRUs should be ready to promote to -updates: [15:39] artful: bug 1763320, bionic: bug 1767128, bug 1750777 [15:39] bug 1763320 in nova (Ubuntu Artful) "[SRU] pike stable release update" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1763320 [15:39] bug 1767128 in nova (Ubuntu Bionic) "[SRU] queens stable releases" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1767128 [15:39] bug 1750777 in neutron (Ubuntu Bionic) "openvswitch agent eating CPU, time spent in ip_conntrack.py" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1750777 [15:53] slangasek: please remove src: elementary from cosmic so that we can finish the efl transition, Debian bug 895221 [15:53] Debian bug 895221 in ftp.debian.org "RM: elementary -- ROM; integrated into efl" [Normal,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/895221 [16:03] and bug 1770680 [16:03] bug 1770680 in dune-pdelab (Ubuntu) "Please remove dune-grid [s390x]" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1770680 [16:10] coreycb: we generally don't do Friday releases [16:10] coreycb: so in most cases such things need to wait for Monday [16:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openexr [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [2.2.1-4] [16:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openexr [armhf] (cosmic-proposed) [2.2.1-4] [16:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openexr [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed) [2.2.1-4] [16:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openexr [arm64] (cosmic-proposed) [2.2.1-4] [16:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openexr [s390x] (cosmic-proposed) [2.2.1-4] [16:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openexr [i386] (cosmic-proposed) [2.2.1-4] === alan_g is now known as alan_g|EOW [17:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hashcheck [s390x] (cosmic-proposed/none) [1.0.0-1] (no packageset) [17:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hashcheck [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed/none) [1.0.0-1] (no packageset) [17:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: braceexpand [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/none) [0.1.2-1] (no packageset) [17:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hashcheck [i386] (cosmic-proposed/none) [1.0.0-1] (no packageset) [17:24] sil2100: sure, that's fine [17:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: inifile [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/none) [0.4-1] (no packageset) [17:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hashcheck [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/none) [1.0.0-1] (no packageset) [17:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-typeguard [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/none) [2.1.4-1] (no packageset) [17:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted braceexpand [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [0.1.2-1] [17:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-typeguard [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [2.1.4-1] [17:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted inifile [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [0.4-1] [18:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hashcheck [arm64] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-1] (no packageset) [18:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hashcheck [armhf] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-1] (no packageset) [18:15] Laney: We can, and committed. [18:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hashcheck [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [1.0.0-1] [18:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hashcheck [armhf] (cosmic-proposed) [1.0.0-1] [18:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hashcheck [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed) [1.0.0-1] [18:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hashcheck [arm64] (cosmic-proposed) [1.0.0-1] [18:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hashcheck [s390x] (cosmic-proposed) [1.0.0-1] [18:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hashcheck [i386] (cosmic-proposed) [1.0.0-1] [19:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ilmbase [s390x] (cosmic-proposed/main) [2.2.1-2] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) [19:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ilmbase [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/main) [2.2.1-2] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) [19:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ilmbase [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed/main) [2.2.1-2] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) [19:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ilmbase [arm64] (cosmic-proposed/main) [2.2.1-2] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) [19:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ilmbase [armhf] (cosmic-proposed/main) [2.2.1-2] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) [19:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-ovsdbapp [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/main) [0.9.1-2ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server) [19:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ilmbase [i386] (cosmic-proposed/main) [2.2.1-2] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) [19:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ilmbase [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [2.2.1-2] [19:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ilmbase [armhf] (cosmic-proposed) [2.2.1-2] [19:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ilmbase [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed) [2.2.1-2] [19:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ilmbase [arm64] (cosmic-proposed) [2.2.1-2] [19:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ilmbase [s390x] (cosmic-proposed) [2.2.1-2] [19:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ilmbase [i386] (cosmic-proposed) [2.2.1-2] [19:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-ovsdbapp [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [0.9.1-2ubuntu1] [19:57] jbicha: elementary shows as having two revdeps in Ubuntu (intone, terminology); will those also fall out for me via process-removals? [20:03] jbicha: ok, I see we have an soname change (libelementary2 -> libelementary1), and rebuilds in cosmic-proposed; and that transitioning renders the libs uninstallable; I'll do this as a force hint to make sure it goes through, then clean up elementary after [20:14] slangasek: please see #ubuntu-devel. jbicha is intentionally dropping patches which we added for MIR inclusion, and forcing the merging work on others. I don't see this appropriate behavior [20:27] tsimonq2: Is there any point in lubuntu-core? It's so tiny as to be a completely useless thing if installed on its own, and your seeds would be less complex if you just rolled it into desktop. [20:27] jbicha: please see https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ilmbase/+bug/1770748 [20:27] Ubuntu bug 1770748 in ilmbase (Ubuntu) "ilmbase symbols files were dropped by the forced merge" [Undecided,New] [20:28] tsimonq2: (and if you genuinely think there's a point in core, your seeds are wrong and need fixing :P) [20:28] * tsimonq2 hands infinity an ace [20:28] *axe [20:28] Wanna do it? [20:28] tsimonq2: Move core into desktop? Sure. I'm already here and committing. [20:29] OK. [20:30] doko: do you mean inappropriate? [20:31] whatever [20:32] sigh [20:33] tsimonq2: Also, is it intentional that your desktop doesn't depend on desktop-common like everyone else's, or was that snowflakiness a mistake? [20:35] tsimonq2: Ahh, might have been because of no-follow-recommends, you had to duplicate desktop-common? [21:01] doko: I'm off work today and just happened to be at the keyboard to respond to jbicha's ping. I certainly agree with the principle that deltas shouldn't be dropped on update without a good reason, but I'm not sure what you want by invoking me in particular. Maybe you mean to invoke the TB instead? [21:12] slangasek: sure, that's the better option