cjwatson | I see walbon's left, but just in case they're reading logs, "apt-listchanges --all foo.deb" is probably the single straightforward command they were looking for | 01:23 |
---|---|---|
tsimonq2 | What does the SRU Team think about bug 1770678? | 02:08 |
ubottu | bug 1770678 in simbody (Ubuntu) "[SRU] Simbody package ships erroneous paths for blas/lapack in the cmake module" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1770678 | 02:08 |
tsimonq2 | It's the Debian maintainer asking for a no-change rebuild of their package in Artful. | 02:09 |
ipatrol | Guess https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/imagemagick/+bug/1117481 can be closed up with perhaps a little QA | 04:57 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 1117481 in ImageMagick "Imagemagick lacks support for webp" [Undecided,New] | 04:57 |
=== maclin1 is now known as maclin | ||
=== giraffe is now known as Guest5068 | ||
=== mhcerri_ is now known as mhcerri | ||
ginggs | tseliot: hi, will you SRU the /dev/nvidia-uvm-tools fix for bionic as well please? | 12:51 |
tseliot | ginggs: yes, I uploaded in cosmic today, and I hope to SRU that soon | 12:55 |
ginggs | tseliot: thanks | 13:22 |
ahasenack | jbicha: hi, good morning/afternoon, #1737053 came to my attention as I'm preparing a new apache upload for cosmic | 13:52 |
ahasenack | jbicha: looks like brotli is still in universe | 13:52 |
ahasenack | should I just upload the new apache which can depend on it, and then libbrotli1 will be pulled into main? Or should some action be taken before by an AA about it? | 13:53 |
ahasenack | I don't see it in excuses, even though cosmic-proposed has one upload from may 4th | 13:54 |
ahasenack | ah, that upload is the one that failed the armhf build | 13:54 |
jbicha | go ahead and upload, it will be noticed for promotion to main once something in main pulls it in | 13:54 |
ahasenack | rbasak: hi, could you please import brotli? It's in universe now, but will be promoted to main | 13:57 |
rbasak | ack | 13:59 |
ahasenack | rbasak: th | 14:00 |
ahasenack | thx | 14:00 |
rbasak | Importing | 14:02 |
rbasak | ahasenack: the import was successful | 15:13 |
ahasenack | rbasak: thanks | 15:14 |
teward | anyone know how to fix mk-sbuild in Xenial to get a Cosmic schroot? It's failing to create the schroot with 'Package pkg-create-dbgsym has no installation candidate" in mk-sbuild. (I'm not yet able to upgrade to Bionic at this time) | 15:30 |
mdeslaur | teward: ignore the warning | 15:32 |
mdeslaur | teward: I got that on bionic creating bionic schroots too but it seems to work fine | 15:32 |
teward | mdeslaur: well I ask because it hard-failed | 15:33 |
mdeslaur | oh, hrm | 15:33 |
teward | mdeslaur: 'twas not a warning, was a hard-fail "error" | 15:33 |
teward | i've got a Bionic system at home, I can test there to see if this is a Xenial-specific mk-sbuild issue, and if it is then I'll probably open bugs, but until then I can't test it (because "work") | 15:34 |
mdeslaur | I got a hard fail too, IIRC, and the schroot still works | 15:34 |
mdeslaur | have you tried the resulting chroot? | 15:34 |
teward | waiting for the other schroots to finish updating (I have a "fire and forget" script that fires off all the updates for supported release chroots) | 15:35 |
teward | i've only got so much computing power on this here system :p | 15:35 |
doko | ginggs: mrbayes and esys-particle autopkg tests are still running, but any other openmpi autopkg test failures are real | 15:37 |
teward | mdeslaur: huh, working now. I worry that something that's supposed to be in the chroot isn't because installation exploded at one step. | 15:39 |
ginggs | doko: ok, will have a look - not sure what can be done about all the armhf FTBFS | 15:43 |
femme | Have differential privacy/data anonymization been evaluated for the ubuntu telemetry? for example this could be used http://arx.deidentifier.org/ | 15:44 |
=== mhcerri_ is now known as mhcerri | ||
Odd_Bloke | debootstrap in bionic doesn't know about cosmic yet; how can I work around that? | 18:23 |
Odd_Bloke | (To mk-sbuild, for clarity.) | 18:23 |
cjwatson | sudo ln -s gutsy /usr/share/debootstrap/scripts/cosmic | 18:24 |
Odd_Bloke | Hmm, that should have been more obvious to me. | 18:26 |
Odd_Bloke | Thanks! | 18:26 |
wxl | i had the same question, actually. are you suggesting, cjwatson, to just build as "gutsy" after the symlink? | 18:33 |
teward | wxl: i did that | 18:33 |
teward | and have for bionic, etc. | 18:33 |
teward | it's basically what i've had to do while not on the latest release(s) | 18:34 |
wxl | huh, ok | 18:34 |
* wxl buys more band-aids :/ | 18:34 | |
Odd_Bloke | wxl: The debootstrap hasn't changed since gutsy, so it's just reused via symlink. | 18:53 |
wxl | Odd_Bloke: well i guess it DOES make sense then :) | 19:07 |
rbasak | doko: does bug 1770748 have to go directly to the TB? Why not the ubuntu-devel@ ML first? | 20:25 |
ubottu | bug 1770748 in ilmbase (Debian) "ilmbase symbols files were dropped by the forced merge" [Unknown,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1770748 | 20:25 |
rbasak | I'm talking about should-we-maintain-C++-symbols-files in this case question. | 20:26 |
rbasak | (because I have an opinion on that technical point, and I'd like to hear the opinions of others) | 20:27 |
doko | rbasak: sure, we can have the technical discussion there, not sure about the procedures | 20:56 |
jbicha | I personally think that this escalated way too quickly | 23:53 |
wxl | jbicha: re: i386? | 23:54 |
jbicha | no, me being referred to the TB about the ilmbase issue | 23:55 |
wxl | ah. can't really comment there. | 23:55 |
jbicha | I assume the referral wasn't meant to be personal but that doesn't help relieve the stress much | 23:56 |
wxl | yeah it doesn't read as personal to me | 23:57 |
teward | mdeslaur: just an FYI, I didn't run into that issue with pkg-create-dbgsym during chroot development when building the Cosmic chroot in a Bionic environment. Guess something with Xenial's sbuild/schroot doesn't like Cosmic? | 23:59 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!