[00:07] <mup> Bug #1771465 opened: Unable to create tabs in MAAS 2.4.0~beta2-6865-gec43e47e6-0ubuntu1 <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1771465>
[00:16] <mup> Bug #1771465 changed: Unable to create tabs in MAAS 2.4.0~beta2-6865-gec43e47e6-0ubuntu1 <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1771465>
[00:31] <mup> Bug #1771465 opened: Unable to create tabs in MAAS 2.4.0~beta2-6865-gec43e47e6-0ubuntu1 <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1771465>
[02:28] <mup> Bug #1771475 opened: maas cli making API calls on port 80 <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1771475>
[04:26] <mup> Bug #1743648 changed: Image import fails <MAAS:Expired> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1743648>
[04:26] <mup> Bug #1756398 changed: Cannot set vlan dhcp_on to true (primary rack controller id not accepted) <uosci> <MAAS:Expired> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1756398>
[04:52] <myrat> hello people
[04:53] <myrat> i want create raid in my hard drive
[04:53] <myrat> i have 5 hdd
[04:54] <myrat> so can i create 2 raid 0 partitions
[09:43] <myrat> how create a openstack project
[10:45] <mup> Bug #1771547 opened: [2.3, CLI] 'subnet update' command parameter value expectations are inconsistent  <4010> <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1771547>
[10:54] <mup> Bug #1771547 changed: [2.3, CLI] 'subnet update' command parameter value expectations are inconsistent  <4010> <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1771547>
[11:09] <mup> Bug #1771547 opened: [2.3, CLI] 'subnet update' command parameter value expectations are inconsistent  <4010> <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1771547>
[11:41] <Son_Goku> hey folks
[11:43] <Son_Goku> I don't suppose anyone has considered making CentOS packages for MAAS?
[11:55] <ananke> Son_Goku: I'd love to have that as an option. however, since it's a canonical product, I won't hold my breath on that ever happening
[11:56] <Son_Goku> ananke, it'd be nice though
[11:56] <Son_Goku> it's not like the CentOS project is closed to any participant
[11:56] <Son_Goku> they have SIGs for stuff like this (like the config management SIG) that MAAS folks could participate in to make it available
[11:57] <Son_Goku> ananke, it'd probably only benefit Canonical, since they'd be able to reach a wider audience
[11:57] <Son_Goku> or if it was in EPEL, it'd be easy to use from even within RHEL
[12:01] <ananke> yes, that would be nice. we're mostly a centos shop, so everything is built around that. maas evaluation is a bit harder since most of our configuration management doesn't have sufficient provisions for ubuntu
[12:02] <Son_Goku> it didn't work out for us because maas configuration of CentOS wasn't that good (back in 1.9)
[12:02] <Son_Goku> ananke, I suspect that if potential customers expressed interest in it, they would probably do it
[12:03] <Son_Goku> though packaging MAAS for RPM distributions is way easier than debian ones, so I don't know why they haven't done it yet anyway...
[12:12] <ananke> I really need to get back to my evaluation of maas/juju. got two racks of hardware prepped and basic maas stood up three or so weeks ago, haven't gotten back to it yet
[12:49] <roaksoax> Son_Goku: you can use the snap
[12:49] <Son_Goku> nope
[12:50] <Son_Goku> snap is not acceptable for infrastructure for various reasons
[12:50] <roaksoax> Son_Goku: you mean this is not acceptable for infrastructure? https://snapcraft.io/
[12:50] <Son_Goku> yes
[12:50] <roaksoax> Son_Goku: how so? i hear completely different statement from a lot of other people
[12:51] <Son_Goku> uncontrolled auto-updating, and no facilities for private mirroring
[12:51] <Son_Goku> or even private internal-only publishing
[12:51] <Son_Goku> roaksoax, also snaps are not supported on CentOS or RHEL anyway ;)
[12:52] <Son_Goku> and on the RH/Fedora platform, there's no confinement, so they don't offer any security either
[12:52] <roaksoax> Son_Goku: the maas snap is not confined yet
[12:52] <Son_Goku> at least in Fedora, classic snaps require manual setup
[12:53] <Son_Goku> but if it's a regular devmode snap, I'm surprised its even in the store
[12:53] <Son_Goku> supposedly, the store guys say they don't accept those
[12:54] <roaksoax> ah yeah classic snaps would require that indeed
[12:55] <Son_Goku> classic snaps don't work out of the box on Fedora, CentOS, or any other non-Ubuntu platform except Solus
[12:57] <Son_Goku> roaksoax, for us, or even if I were to personally use MAAS (which I'm considering), I want it to be able to be managed through the system package manager, be properly working with SELinux, etc.
[13:00] <roaksoax> Son_Goku: sure, but once snaps are in there, that's the way we would support maas
[13:11] <Son_Goku> it's unlikely as long as SELinux based confinement isn't supported
[14:50] <kristian2709_> Hey, please could someone help me pxe boot maas images? I am getting this error. "mount: mounting https://images.maas.io/ephemeral-v3/daily/bionic/amd64/20180426.2/squashfs on /root failed: No such device"
[14:57] <mup> Bug #1771600 opened: [2.3.3] There are no procedure for HA when using snaps <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1771600>
[15:30] <roaksoax> kristian2709_: ?/
[15:30] <roaksoax> kristian2709_: when do you get that error ?
[15:53] <kristian2709_> roaksoax: I am doing a pxe boot from custom pxe server
[16:10] <roaksoax> kristian2709_: right, that's not supported in MAAS. MAAS is the pxe server
[16:10] <kristian2709_> roaksoax: I want to boot it with my custom pxe server
[16:11] <roaksoax> kristian2709_: MAAS is the pxe server, you not really using MAAS if you have another external pxe server
[16:12] <kristian2709_> roaksoax: I do not want to use maas at all, I want my own pxe server so I can boot it in a non maas environment
[16:13] <roaksoax> kristian2709_: right, so unfortunately that's not something I can help you with
[16:14] <kristian2709_> roaksoax: really? its a maas image, so you should be able to help me with that
[16:56] <roaksoax> kristian2709_: maas images are built for use with MAAS... you are trying to use a /MAAS/ image on a different PXE server or a non-MAAS environment
[16:56] <roaksoax> kristian2709_: unfortauntely, i cannot help you with that
[16:59] <kristian2709_> roaksoax: is there a way to create a custom image to use it like that image, but on a custom pxe server?
[19:52] <mup> Bug #1771658 opened: [2.4, UI, regression] Machine interfaces - Can't edit vlan or subnet of physical  interface or bridge for machine. <MAAS:Triaged by blake-rouse> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1771658>
[21:48] <sentinel-prime> roaxsoax are you here
[23:17] <sentinel-prime> roaxsoax are you here that change i made kinda worked it allows pacages to install but anything coming off the net that is not a package still does not get downloaded